Saturday, November 24, 2018

Those Dam Russians...

Logic
By Joe Ingino
Editor/Publisher

“I live a dream in a nightmare world”
  
Those Dam Russians...
  The headlines read..... “Trudeau must come clean about Russian interference in 2015 Canadian election: Conservatives.”
Really..... Like, I don’t know how many times I read that....I keep saying.... LIKE REALLY.
The Russians interfering with Canadian politics....   As if Canadian politics are not messed up enough on their own?
If I ever read ‘fake news’... this has to take the cake.... As if the Russian even know where Canada is or care for that matter...
Canadian politics is so messed up that we could actually have Russian confused on who to back...
The Liberals are no different then that of the Conservatives.  The little engine that could NDP’rs are so desperate that they are the gray line between the Cons and Libs.
It must the only country in the world that it really does not matter who wins.... Nothing will change. 
The cost of living will continue to go up...our dollar keep sliding and jobs keep going south on us... Why would the Russians want to waste time in Canadian politics.
My understanding is that any government entity is only interest in another country political condition is if there are any gains to be made by doing so.
Most countries collect intel from one another to keep tab on the local economies and or any military movements.
Canada the cocktail of ethnic make up... has lost it’s unity.... If it is not for the Quebecois holding small pockets of culture, intellectual reservation and preservation of tradition.   Canada, has become a stew of cultures that can’t be defined other then called foreign.
Then the question... why would the Russians want to waste their time and resources on manipulating political outcomes?
We can stretch that thought even to the U.S.    Why would the Russian want to mess with American politics and if so... Why would the help the Republicans win?
Trump has turned that country on it’s head...   The Russians would want someone in power with more of their political inclination... not a guy like Trump.
CNN and it’s ever ending wet dream of impeaching Trump.... will go to any lengths to drag this out... As for the U.S. Russian investigation...That has to be the worlds biggest joke.
Like really...
It is a modern day witch hunt that serves no purpose other than to deviate from the real world issues.
Issues like the China move to take over the south seas and control shipping, industry and commerce coming in and out of the region.
Russia messing with Canadian politics.....   I can’t stop shaking my head at the stupidity of the notion.
Personally I think we need to restructure Canadian politics and take out the financial factor out of it.   Eliminate the factor that only the wealthy amongst us can afford to run for office.  We must eliminate and educate on the value of serving the people of the land.    We must re-allign our view when it comes to how we treat all our people.   Not some.  We need to put priority in building Canada.

Joe Ingino

Latest outrage from the D.C. swamp

Latest outrage from the D.C. swamp
By Larry Klayman
It never ends! The so-called Washington, D.C., establishment swamp grows murkier and more deadly with every passing hour! Needless to say, it is on the verge of swallowing up the vision and creation of our Founding Fathers. The federal judiciary is a major occupant of this swamp!

While I will get into this in depth in my weekly show on Radio America "Special Prosecutor with Larry Klayman," which airs each Sunday, and is podcast as well (go to www.freedomwatchusa.org for local listings and to hear my podcast), let us take a brief walk down memory lane of the corrupt judicial week that was.

First, "hot off the press," there is the ruling of the Honorable Timothy J. Kelly, incredibly granting a temporary restraining order in the lawsuit filed by CNN against the president and his staff for revoking the White House press pass of the "Communist/Clinton News Network's" Jim Acosta for improperly touching a White House female intern. Incredibly, and most tellingly, CNN was supported by Fox News, which increasingly has been moving left thanks to its new chiefs, the Murdoch sons, both of whom are dyed-in-the-wool liberals. (See Adriana Cohen, "Bill O'Reilly: Fox Has Gone to the Dogs," Boston Globe, Nov. 15.) More importantly is the sellout by this Trump-appointed Judge Kelly in ordering the president to give the vile Acosta back his press pass.

Not only is there clearly no First Amendment constitutional right to own a White House press pass – as CNN is free to send another, hopefully this time respectful reporter to cover the administration, among many other legal grounds for Kelly to have denied the CNN complaint – but this incredible ruling underscores what I have been preaching about the federal judiciary in particular for many years since I conceived of and founded Judicial Watch in 1994.

Put simply, the overwhelming majority of the jurists selected by both Democrat and Republican presidents are the compromised product of the establishments of both parties. They generally got their jobs by not ruffling feathers and not taking strong, principled positions. In the case of Kelly – a Trump appointee likely recommended to the president by Don McGahn, the former White House counsel and himself an establishment Republican who eventually was shown the door by The Donald, likely for his backstage collaboration with Special Counsel Robert Mueller – this is a jurist who not only lacks courage, but also is weak.

In a case I had before him recently, he ignored false testimony by the head of a prominent "conservative" public-interest group, mostly likely because to go against him could have harmed his standing in the conservative community. This person had submitted a sworn affidavit, under oath, attesting that he knew nothing about the underlying facts for a lawsuit I had filed, when testimony from a fellow board member later proved otherwise. The reason for this affidavit was so the head of the group could try to escape being questioned under oath about the case.

For a federal judge to look the other way to protect his own derriere was simply despicable, much less a violation of his oath of office to uphold the integrity of his own court and the justice system as whole.

But now Judge Kelly has gone a step further in revealing his true stripes; and they are not stripes of a judicial tiger. They are the stripes akin to the cowardly lion in "The Wizard of Oz." This is because not only does Kelly obviously want to keep his membership and "press pass" credentials in to the establishment "D.C. Swamp Club," but, like nearly all the judges I have encountered over the last 41 years of my legal practice, the jurist does not likely want to get on the bad side of a powerful media organization such as CNN, owned and operated by the mega Time Warner/ATT conglomerate. He obviously does not want this media conglomerate powerhouse, and its leftist competitors, to be trained on him.

Years ago when I was running Judicial Watch, I brought a libel suit against the Washington Post for having allegedly defamed me. As is true here, the District of Columbia Superior Court judge assigned to the case, sat on it for several years, only to later dismiss it, disingenuously claiming that the alleged defamation was a "close question" and that the benefit of the doubt had to go to the Post. After another several years of appeal, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed the dismissal, also citing a so-called "close question."
The bottom line is this: Judges are afraid to take on the media for fear that this will generate bad press for them down the line.
This is obviously not the way our judicial system should work, but it does show why the nation is going through an increasing downward spiral to a complete breakdown of ethics, morality and legality.

Judges are in principle our most important public servants, as they are not only empowered to protect We the People from not just the tyranny of the deep-state-controlled government, but also wrongs committed elsewhere. When they bail out, and not over Tokyo, and abdicate their judicial responsibilities to further their own cowardly skins, then the republic is in serious trouble.
And, the smaller lesson here is that even Republican-appointed jurists can be part of the problem, including the ones appointed, based on bad advice, by our chief law enforcement official, Donald Trump. With the growing and never-ending Mueller witch hunt and the the new reincarnated Nancy Pelosi-run House of Representatives, the president and his agenda, if not his longevity in office, are in serious jeopardy. Few have his back, even so called conservative jurists!
The days and months ahead will be fateful times for the survival our nation. Judges such as Timothy Kelly do not give us must cause to hope that the legal system is up to the task of protecting our constitutional democracy.
We the People, through citizens grand juries and other legal means, must, more than ever, rise up to save the nation. Go to www.freedomwatchusa.org to sign up for Freedom Watch's Justice League and our Judicial Selection Strike Force, designed to put principled judges on the bench. Please join the fight before it is too late!

WHY CALORIE COUNTING DOESN'T WORK - NOT ALL CALORIES ARE CREATED EQUAL.

Healthy Eating
from Marissa Liana
 Certified Nutritional Practitioner/Health Coach
WHY CALORIE COUNTING DOESN'T WORK - NOT ALL CALORIES ARE
CREATED EQUAL.
Are you counting calories but still not losing weight? It’s important to know that not all calories are created equal. Here’s why????
1 Nutrient density is not the same as calorie density. Nutrient density refers to the proportions of nutrients, specifically the vitamins and minerals that are contained in a food. Vitamins and minerals are considered essential nutrients because they are required to perform hundreds of roles in the body that keep us alive and healthy. They help strengthen our bones, boost our immune system, convert food into energy, repair muscle tissue, and increase rates of detoxification.
Too many people are eating calorie dense foods that lack nutrient density, which therefore sets their body systems up for failure. It is 100% possible to be over-fed and under-nourished.
2 Hormonal response of food. Carbohydrates, fats, and proteins all generate different hormonal responses in the body. Carbs increase insulin, the hormone responsible for fat storage. Proteins increase glucagon, which helps to burn/break down stored fuel sources including fat stores. Fats do not increase insulin, help to keep us full and cholesterol is actually needed for proper sex hormone balance (like estrogen and testosterone). The way food affects your hormones has a huge impact on your body composition and the way you look.
3 Food impacts your gut’s microbiome. In order to manage your weight, hunger and body composition, you must keep your healthy gut bacteria flourishing. Those who struggle with obesity actually have different microflora (good bacteria/probiotics) in their G.I tracts than those who are comparatively lean! Gut bacteria play a large role in extracting energy and nutrients from food. If your gut flora is compromised (from a diet high in refined carbs and processed food, diet low in fiber, diet lacking in raw, fermented foods) you are not probably utilizing your food for fuel and can carry excess weight. .
If you’re ready to start a meal plan that balances your gut, hormones and replenishes your nutrients, visit www.marissaliana.com or email me at marissalianacnp@gmail.com to set up a consult now.
                                             Until next time, stay well! Marissa

Can’t Buy Me Love

from Wayne & Tamara
Can’t Buy Me Love
  I am 26. A year and a half ago I got into an arranged marriage.
I got to know my husband through a family friend. I started to Skype with him on the initial days before my engagement, as he was in Germany. After a couple of days of chatting, my parents and his parents decided to set the engagement date in one month.
I was very much unsure about this. I strongly believed courtship was important before marriage, and I felt this was too soon. A day before my engagement, I met my husband in person. He looked a little nerdy and very robotic. I am not a person who goes after looks, but of course in an arranged marriage the first impression matters most. When I got home, I felt lost. I was scared and didn’t want my family to feel let down, so I went with the flow. The engagement took place the next day, and the wedding date was set in three months. I asked to set the marriage later, but no one from my husband’s side agreed. Here comes my wedding day. With a heavy heart I get married. That night I told my husband let’s not have sex. I am not sure why, but I wasn’t physically attracted towards him.
We honeymooned in Australia. It was an awkward two weeks. I didn’t hold his hand. I didn’t have sex with him. I could not physically connect with him without love, and I tortured myself and my husband at the same time. He left to go back to Germany, and I went back to my home country. Getting my visa to come through was a major issue. I stopped calling my husband. Over a text message he asked me if everything was okay. That’s when I burst and told him I don’t like this marriage and don’t want to come live with you. He replied that he is an optimistic person and things are going to go well, which only made me angrier at him. A year passed, I have my visa, I am in Germany. It’s been a month with my husband and his parents. We barely talk to each other. I feel violent and aggressive towards him. I am not sure why. I hate myself for being that way. In return he has not done anything bad to me. I told him many times I want to go back home. Everyone asks the same one question, which I am unable to answer. What made you dislike him to the extent of hating him?
Lea
Lea, there doesn’t have to be a reason why we love or don’t love. You don’t love him There is nothing anyone can do to make him into someone you will love. Your husband sounds like a perfectly decent human being. Give him credit for not being violent or forcing you—things which occur in some arranged marriage letters we receive. Your anger isn’t at him. It is at yourself for going along with this arranged marriage and trying to save face for your family. You are kicking yourself for not standing up for what you felt is right. That’s where the anger and venom come from. That’s the lesson here.
When we make a mistake, the only thing to do is acknowledge it. That’s painful, especially in serious matters. But when we recognize our mistake and go through the pain, we learn a lesson we will never forget. You now know you must act from within yourself and what you know of yourself, not from what anyone else wants. The more you take this on yourself, the more his family will accept it. You fell for a myth, a fable that is part of your cultural tradition. That’s all. Now move on.
Wayne & Tamara
Send letters to: DirectAnswers@WayneAndTamara.com

Ovarian Cancer, the One That Whispers

Ovarian Cancer, the One That Whispers 

          What couldn’t I believe? Discovering that it’s been 42 years since I last wrote about ovarian cancer! During my time as a surgeon, what was my primary concern about this malignancy? And what has happened in the last four decades to bring hope to those diagnosed with this disease?

          Ovarian cancer is the third most common malignancy of the female pelvic organs, after uterine and cervical cancer. But it is also the most fatal pelvic malignancy.

          The risk of ovarian cancer increases with age. It’s also more likely to occur if close relatives have developed the disease. Also at risk are childless women and those who have had breast cancer. Vulnerable too, are those with early onset of menstruation, or a late menopause. And some women inherit genetic mutations that place them at increased risk.

          Epidemiological studies also show that the incidence of ovarian cancer varies from one ethnic group to another. Japanese women are less likely to develop ovarian cancer. Conversely, the rate is high in Swedish women. In North America there’s another interesting discrepancy. The disease is higher in whites than non-whites. And, in Africa, white women have double the rate of ovarian cancer than black women.

          So what did I worry about as a gynecological surgeon? It wasn’t the possibility of making a technical error during surgery. It was missing the diagnosis.

          Ovarian malignancy has been called the silent disease, or the disease that whispers, for good reason. For instance, women with this cancer often complain of constipation, increased urination, mild digestive symptoms, loss of appetite, weight loss, and abdominal bloating. The problem is that many other women, who do not suffer from this disease, have the same vague symptoms.

          Another problem is female anatomy. The ovaries hang from the fallopian tubes like pillows on a clothes line. This means that loops of bowel are easily pushed aside while the tumour continues to grow, which can result in a large ovarian mass before pain occurs.

          What about tests? The Pap smear is quite accurate in detecting cervical cancer cells, but rarely picks up those from the ovary. Another test, called the CA 125 is more reliable, but again there are diagnostic problems. Women with ovarian malignancy often have elevated levels of CA125. But others never show an abnormality. To add to diagnostic difficulties, patients with benign tumours, such as fibroids, pelvic infection, and endometriosis, may show increased level of CA125. So, false reports can lead to other tests that cause further complications.

          Even the annual pelvic examination which should always be done, but isn’t, presents potential trouble. Ovaries are the size of a walnut and difficult to feel if patients are obese, or if they haven’t urinated before examination, or if the bowel is loaded with fecal material. In these cases the doctor may decide that an ultrasound may be useful in evaluating ovaries. But it may still not reveal early malignancy.

          So what has happened in the last 42 years? And why has it been so long for me to write again about ovarian cancer? The simple answer is that there hasn’t been any good news to write about in all these years. We have all seen huge advances in many aspects of medicine and surgery during this time. But for ovarian cancer, too many obstacles remain for researchers.

          Standard treatment following diagnosis has been surgical removal of both ovaries and uterus, followed by either chemotherapy, radiation or a combination of both therapies. But unfortunately, the recurrence rate continues to remain high.

          So, after 42 years what is the good news? During my last visit to the Harvard Medical School, I learned how researchers had finally cured cancer in rats by immunological therapy. What does this mean for humans?

          Similar research at the University of Toronto reveals that several immunological studies are being done that promise new hope for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The immune system is a powerful weapon in fighting infection. The next step is to utilize its full potential to eliminate one of the great killers. I believe it will not be another 42 years before this happens.

  Online docgiff.com Comments info@docgiff.com