Saturday, December 21, 2024
My Christmas Wish List
By Lisa Robinson
To The Honourable Doug Ford
Premier of Ontario
Room 281, Legislative Building,
Queen’s Park
Toronto, ON M7A 1A1
Premier@ontario.ca
Subject: Protecting Democracy and Safeguarding the Voice of the People
File: A1400 - 001
Dear Premier Ford,
I am writing to you with deep concern regarding the most recent announcement to amend the
Municipal Act. This proposal poses a serious threat to the democratic principles that underpin
our nation and erodes the fundamental rights of Canadians to choose the elected officials who
represent their voices. The introduction of such sweeping changes must be reconsidered, as it
leaves the door wide open for abuse of power, corruption, and collusion among key municipal
actors.
Allowing council members, mayors, and city-paid Integrity Commissioners to collectively wield
the power to remove an elected official sets a dangerous precedent. This approach is ripe for
manipulation, retaliation, and political weaponization. It creates an environment where those in
positions of influence can conspire to silence dissenting voices, punish political opponents, and
skew future election outcomes—in essence, a form of election tampering. The power to elect
and remove officials must remain firmly in the hands of the people, not in the hands of those
who stand to benefit from their removal.
The existing framework already includes mechanisms to address legitimate concerns like harassment, discrimination, or misconduct under workplace and human rights legislation. There is no justifiable reason to grant city councils and Integrity Commissioners the power to overrule the people's choice, especially when existing legal pathways are sufficient to address these issues.
The City of Pickering is a stark example of how this system is already being exploited. Council
has repeatedly targeted me, Councillor Lisa Robinson, by suspending my pay on three separate occasions—not for misconduct, but for exercising my right to freedom of expression and standing up for the beliefs and priorities of my constituents. My advocacy for transparent governance, my support for the principle that only governmental flags should fly on government buildings, and my call for fair and inclusive access to public restrooms are rooted in the will of
the people I represent.
Most recently, I face yet another attempt to strip me of three months' pay—my only source of
income as a single mother. My so-called "offense" was stating, “If I were to become mayor, I
would use strong mayor powers to remove the CAO, city solicitor, and a few directors because
corruption starts at the top. I would tear down city hall, build it back up, and give it back to the
people.” This is not misconduct—this is political expression. Every elected official should have
the right to propose changes, share their vision, and advocate for what they believe is in the
best interest of their constituents. Punishing this kind of expression is a gross misuse of power.
Meanwhile, there have been far more serious transgressions by other council members that
have gone unpunished. One council member has made violent threats towards me, stating they
would "stick a knife in [my] back, twist it slowly, and [I] would never know until he was ready to
pull it out." The same individual stated they would "sharpen their sword and decapitate the motherf---er" in reference to the mayor. (There is a recording of this comment). I have also endured sexual harassment and psychological harassment. Shockingly, there was no suspension or accountability for these threats or harassment. They were all swept under the carpet. Why? Because of the individual’s status as a senior councillor with close ties to the mayor, CAO, and city Integrity Commissioner. This clear double standard highlights how the proposed changes to the Municipal Act would be weaponized for political gain.
The power to remove an elected official should never rest in the hands of council, the mayor, or the bureaucrats employed by the city. It should remain with the people. When municipal actors are permitted to play judge, jury, and executioner, democracy itself is at risk. Why even bother holding elections if those in power can remove their opponents on a whim? This new legislative change would serve as a backdoor to undermine political opposition and ensure only the "preferred" voices remain.
I urge every Member of Parliament (MP) and Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) to take a
hard look at the implications of this bill. It is not merely an amendment—it is a fundamental attack on the democratic process. When those in power can remove their opposition, they no
longer serve the people—they serve only themselves.
Minister Calandra, I implore you to reconsider this dangerous course of action. The people's right to choose their representatives is sacred, and any attempt to strip that right away must be
met with fierce resistance. We must protect our democracy from corruption, collusion, and authoritarian overreach. If the Municipal Act is to be amended, it should be done to prevent such abuses of power—not to facilitate them.
Protecting Democracy and Safeguarding the Voice of the People
December 13, 2024
Sincerely, Lisa Robinson
City Councillor, Ward 1
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment