Making A Difference

Making A Difference

By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Articles Published Columns in Canada and The United States Everyone likes to complain. But far from few actually stand up against all odds and do something about it. We are upon a call to action by our Provincial elect. Out of the blue Ford calls and election as to expect to solidify the seats of conservatives across the Province. A bold move, that test the will of taxpayers at large. By now you all may be aware that I put my name forth Ontario New Blue Party as your Oshawa candidate. If we learned anything from the recent U.S. elections. It is time to put new blood in office. Stop electing - re-electing careered politicians that once they get in they sit on their hands. The U.S. took the right lead. Elect someone from outside the establishment. A successful business person with a proven business track record. Someone that knows the value of a dollar and the commitment to sacrifice in the name of humanity. As a candidate. I will not profess to know everything. But what I know I know it well. I may not have all the answers. But I have the solutions to real problems founded on experience. this is why I am running. We have millions of dollar coming to Oshawa through the Province and in my opinion they are wasted. The sitting NDP MPP has let jobs slip out of Oshawa and is content with token jobs in return. The MPP in my opinion is not approachable, arrogant and ignorant of the billions of dollars sitting on the side lines wanting to come to Ontario. To Oshawa. For the past 4 years she has yet to return a phone call to her local City newspaper. French as the City of Oshawa candidate has never visited me or any local business that I know off to ask what our needs may be from the Province. I think it is time to stop the waste of tax dollars we are paying this MPP and elect someone that has first hand experience in the downtown. Someone that has brought to Oshawa the only successful shop local campaign as seen by the many signs posted on local downtown shops. All I am asking for an opportunity to serve you. I will not promise you anything but instead deliver the assurance of working with the municipal government to put and end to people living on the street. I will deliver good paying jobs by approaching developers, business owners and the right type of industry to come to Oshawa. I will aggressively look for funding to better all aspects of Oshawanians. I will develop special partnerships, sponsorship with corporations and those directly involved in finance to assure that our downtown may thrive again. To get rid of crime by working with DRPS for more funding. I will work hard to influence an Ontario balanced budget. I will assure every citizens that all calls will be answered and returned. I promise to bring government back to you. To uphold decency and dignity. To protect our identity and bring back economic pride to Oshawa. Now it is your choice. You have a choice to make a positive difference in your life.

Employers Are Not in the 'Give a Chance Business'

Employers Are Not in the 'Give a Chance Business' By Nick Kossovan Many job seekers become frustrated and angry because they believe employers should take a chance on hiring them. Most job seekers fail, or refuse, to grasp that hiring is a critical business decision involving an investment of their time, money, and trust—the stakes are high. Great hires can propel a team forward, while bad hires can create setbacks, disrupt a company's culture, and waste resources. When a hiring manager assesses a candidate, they're not just asking, "Can this person do the job?" they're also asking: · Will this person stick around? · Will they be manageable? · Will they fit into the current team and culture? · Will I regret hiring this person six months from now? A common phrase among job seekers is "Give people a chance." Expecting employers to take a chance on you and blaming them when they don't displays a sense of entitlement. Employers aren't in the business of giving chances. Business survival requires being risk-averse. Minimizing hiring risks is in a business's best interest. In this respect, it's the job seeker's responsibility to demonstrate why the reward of hiring them outweighs the risk. The job market is a battlefield where there are many job seekers who, admittedly, out of desperation, are, to put it mildly, "not playing fair." An employer's hiring decision isn't merely about filling a vacancy. The person hired will, to some extent, affect their bottom line, team chemistry, and long-term goals. I've seen, as you likely have, how hiring the wrong person can lead to productivity losses, decreased morale, and budget wasting. You can't fault employers for selecting employees cautiously; you would, too, if you owned the business. On the other hand, employers can be regarded as 'givers of low-risk chances.' No matter how much due diligence an employer does to mitigate hiring risks, they're still taking a chance—a risk—on the candidate who they deemed to be the most qualified, will deliver the results the business needs, and will fit their culture. Despite employers designing their hiring process in ways they believe will mitigate hiring risks, hiring people doesn't come with any guarantees. The best an employer can do is hire the candidate they believe poses the lowest hiring risk. Most job seekers focus on demonstrating their skills and experience but fail to consider how they might appear as a hiring risk, such as: · Being underqualified or overqualified · Posting negative comments on social media · Exhibiting a sense of entitlement · Having a lengthy employment gap · Holding several short-term jobs Applying for a job involves being compared to everyone else who applied. Put yourself in the employer's shoes. If you received over 500 applications for a Sales Director role, whom would you find "less risky"? Candidate A: Has had four jobs in seven years. Candidate B: Has been at their current job for 14 years. Candidate A: Has a complete LinkedIn profile (profile picture, banner, completed sections) showing the measurable value they've brought to previous employers. Candidate B: Has an incomplete LinkedIn profile. Candidate A: Was referred by an employee. Candidate B: Applied online. Candidate A: Includes a compelling cover letter. Candidate B: Doesn't include a cover letter. It's the job seeker's responsibility to prove that they're worth taking a hiring risk on. You should approach your job search strategically, showing that you are not just another candidate, but one who can add measurable value to the business, such as increasing revenue, reducing costs, or solving problems. With so many qualified job seekers in the job market, why would an employer opt for a candidate with perceived risks? If you believe employers should "give you a chance," you're setting yourself up for disappointment, leading to frustration and anger. Instead, flip the script and show employers that you're a low-risk hire who will add value to their business. Here's how: Build a Strong Resume and LinkedIn Profile: Numbers are the language of business; speak it! Use numbers to demonstrate your past successes and value. Employers hire results, not unsubstantiated opinions. Leverage Networking: A warm introduction will significantly reduce the perceived risks of hiring you. Contact people in your professional network who are connected to the employer you're applying to or may know someone connected to your targeted employer. (It's a small world.) Prepare for Interviews: Don't just respond to questions; prepare thoughtful questions for your interviewer, thus showing enthusiasm and engagement. Follow-Up: Few job seekers send thank-you notes after interviews; therefore, doing so sets you apart. A thank-you note shows initiative, reiterates your interest, and, most importantly, gives you an opportunity to address any concerns raised during the interview. As for cultural fit, I believe in being yourself and letting the chips fall where they fall. Don't contort yourself, as self-proclaimed career coaches advise job seekers to try to "fit in"; if the employer doesn't see you as a fit, why would you want to join? Employers don't owe you a chance; they owe their business and existing employees the lowest hiring risk they can find. It's on you to show employers that hiring you is a low-risk decision they won't regret making. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Trudeau’s farewell: A divisive leader now calling for unity

Trudeau’s farewell: A divisive leader now calling for unity By Sami Parvez Justin Trudeau has changed his tone towards Canada and Canadians following the announcement of his resignation as leader of the Liberal Party and Prime Minister on Jan. 6, 2025. Trudeau has long been perceived as favoring only those who supported him while showing disdain for his opponents. Within his own caucus, anyone who stood up to him was shown the exit door, as exemplified by former Justice Minister and Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould. His shift in tone comes amid heightened tensions with the United States. After Donald Trump called for the annexation of Canada and imposed tariffs on Canadian goods, Trudeau called for national unity to oppose the tariffs. “This is a moment of pride. This is a moment of pulling together. This is a moment for Canada to be solid in our identity, in our sovereignty and in our presence, for our friends and neighbours,” Trudeau told reporters during a visit to Paris for the AI summit on Feb. 11, 2025. Since winning the U.S. presidential election in Nov. 2024, Donald Trump has pushed for tariffs on Canada and suggested it become the 51st U.S. state, citing concerns over defense spending and border security. On Feb. 1, 2025, he signed executive orders imposing a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports, with a reduced 10% tariff on Canadian energy products. In response, Trudeau announced retaliatory tariffs worth $155 billion. Following a phone call between the two leaders, Trump agreed to pause the tariffs for 30 days. However, on March 12, 2025, he will impose 25% tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum imports from Canada. Trudeau’s efforts to position himself as a defender of Canada against Trump’s aggressive trade policies stand in stark contrast to how he treated his own citizens during times of domestic unrest. While he now calls for national unity, his past actions have sown deep divisions within Canada itself. One of the most striking examples was his response to the Freedom Convoy protests in 2022. Instead of listening to the concerns of working-class Canadians frustrated by his government’s heavy-handed COVID-19 mandates, Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act for the first time in Canadian history. He labeled the protesters as extremists and crushed the movement through financial restrictions and police intervention. During the 2021 snap election campaign, Trudeau told a Quebec television station that those who refused COVID-19 vaccinations were often racist and misogynistic extremists. “They don’t believe in science or progress and are very often misogynistic and racist,” he said in French in Sept. 2021. In 2019, Trudeau acknowledged that Canada had committed genocide against Indigenous peoples, specifically regarding the findings of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (MMIWG) inquiry. However, in 2021, when the House of Commons voted 266-0 to declare that China was committing genocide against the Uyghur Muslim minority, Trudeau and his Cabinet abstained, arguing that the term “genocide” is “extremely loaded” and that certain standards must be met before it can be formally used. This inconsistency drew criticism. For months in 2021, flags on federal buildings were flown at half-mast following the discovery of unmarked graves at former residential school sites, including on Canada Day. While this was meant as a solemn acknowledgment of past injustices, it also sparked debate over how Canada should balance recognition of its history with national pride. As Trudeau's time in office is coming to an end, Canadians should reflect on his leadership. Instead of uniting the country, he used political wedges to keep us divided based on vaccine status, religion, gender, and race. He will be remembered as one of the most divisive leaders in Canadian history. Before anything else, we are Canadians, and we should take pride in that. Canada is the land of opportunity, and freedom is our identity. As Sir Wilfrid Laurier once said, “Canada is free, and freedom is its nationality.” February 15 is National Flag of Canada Day, a time to proudly wear or fly the maple leaf as a symbol of our national pride. Let it be flown proudly from coast to coast to coast. O Canada!.

Why Trump Shouldn't Negotiate With Putin On Ukraine

Why Trump Shouldn't Negotiate With Putin On Ukraine by Thomas L. Knapp Last May, Donald Trump bragged on Truth Social that "IF PRESIDENT, I WOULD BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE AN END TO THIS HORRIBLE AND RAPIDLY ESCALATING WAR WITHIN 24 HOURS" (all-caps styling his). Last October, Trump upped the claim at an Iowa campaign rally: "I will end the war in Ukraine before I even step foot in the White House again." The war didn't end prior to January 20. Nor did the war end by January 21. However, on February 12, Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin finally held what Trump called a "lengthy and highly productive" phone call, after which Trump touted coming negotiations (with a possible assist from China, the Wall Street Journal reports) to end the war. That's a bad idea for at least three reasons. One reason is the Russian regime -- like other regimes, and for good reason -- considers the US regime "not agreement capable." Going all the way back to its treaties with Native American tribes and continuing up to the present day, the US has a terrible record on holding up its end of deals and complying with provisions of treaties it signs on to. Another reason is Putin's attitude toward negotiating with Trump specifically. Pepe Escobar characterizes that attitude as "negotiating with Team Trump is like playing chess with a pigeon: The bird walks all over the chessboard, sh*ts indiscriminately, knocks over pieces, declares victory, then runs away." The third reason, however, is the biggest: The war in Ukraine is not and never has been the US regime's business. The war might well have been averted if the US hadn't fomented a coup in Ukraine in 2014, leading to the secessions of Crimea, Luhansk, and Donetsk, followed by eight years of US-Russia proxy war in the latter two areas and the US throwing gasoline on the fake fire of Ukraine as a prospective NATO member state. The following full-on war might well have ended quickly -- with only those seceded areas in Russian hands -- if the US and its NATO lackeys hadn't simultaneously armed/funded the Ukrainian forces, while leaning on Ukraine to refuse further negotiations after the Russian rejection of an early ceasefire draft. Donald Trump negotiating with Vladimir Putin on behalf of Ukraine can't plausibly produce an agreement which either side -- let alone the Ukrainian side -- considers itself bound by. The best course for the US, for Ukraine, and arguably for Russia, is for Trump to tell Ukrainian president Volodomyr Zelenskyy that US involvement in the war -- arms, funding, and supposed mediation assistance -- is drawing to a close. That would free Zelenskyy to drive the best deal he can and Putin to declare victory, settle for what he has, and pull Russia's teat out of the Ukraine wringer.

My Old House

By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist I have always loved old houses. I don’t know exactly what it is that attracts me to them. Maybe it’s the uniqueness of them, how every room is a bit different than the next. I love the little quirks that you find as you walk through a century home. It could be a little step up here or there. An odd shaped door or window, and don’t even get me going on the moldings. Things from yester year, that make walking through some houses just like stepping back in time. I remember when I bought the old semi on Celina St. My daughter walked in and said, “oh wow, look at the doorknobs on the bedroom doors”. They were the old-fashioned glass doorknobs that you just don’t see anymore. They actually reminded me of my grandparents’ farmhouse doors when I was a child. There are so many wonderful old houses here in Oshawa that I would love to fix up. Keep some of the original charm and update the rest of the house, making it a perfect blend of old and new. Alas, I can only fix up the one I live in at the moment, so that is exactly what I am doing. I will take you along with me as I complete the renovations on my old house. I bought this house in 2020. Just before Covid-19 sent the real estate market into a frenzy of activity. It will actually be a combination of renovation and interior decoration. I have decided that I want to change the entire colour scheme of the house, on both floors. There is a finished basement but that has just been redone, and I quite like it. When I bought the house, I had the main floor painted a cocoa beige kind of colour, very earthy. I really liked it. I still like it, but I got it into my head that I wanted to go with a beach theme. I really want to lighten the rooms up, and I’ve always loved bright pops of colour. So, on the main floor there is only the kitchen, living room and hallway that are being redone. There is a bedroom on the main floor, however I use that as an office. It’s done in the earthy colour and because the door is closed to that room most of the time, I will leave it for now. So, stay tuned weekly for progress updates on my old house. As always, if you have questions about anything you read in my column just drop me a line and I’ll be sure to answer them..

Siren Song

By Wayne & Tamara I'm seeing a girl who has me in the biggest state of confusion. We met through friends and went from zero to 60 in a matter of hours. That was unlike both of us, or at least, I'm trusting it's unlike her. We really hit it off and started dating, seeing each other for the most part of a week or two. We decided to be exclusive, but after a bit of that, she realized my idea of exclusivity didn't include her constant flirting with friends and strangers alike. So we took things down a notch. I'm extremely into this girl. I've analyzed and analyzed, and this is no "wanting what you can't get" case. I know I need to be her friend above all else. I'm always there for her, even when she won't admit she needs it. I talk things out with her with a true interest in her needs. When we're in the company of others, I barely exist, let alone come across as anything other than a minor friend. Only when there's a female near does she make her presence felt. Fine, fine, I understand. My issue is we argue because she constantly fails to call me and changes plans on me without warning. Every time she's back with an apology and a suggestion we spend time alone. This, of course, brings back my interest. I'm trying so damned hard to be understanding, but I can't figure out when enough is enough. Gavin Gavin, Odysseus was sailing home at the end of the Trojan War. He knew of the dangerous coast where the Sirens lived, women whose beautiful song lured sailors onto rocks where their ships were wrecked and their lives lost. So to ensure safe passage, Odysseus stuffed wax in the ears of his men and had himself lashed to the mast. The enchanting song of the Sirens nearly drove Odysseus mad, and he begged his men to free him. But they were under strict orders and only tightened his bonds. In this way, the peril passed and Odysseus went on with his life. You are under the spell of the first night you coupled with this siren, but all this siren has to offer you is madness. We can't tie you to a mast, but perhaps the myth of Odysseus will be bee's wax for your ears. You are only one of many sailors being dashed on her rocks. Wayne & Tamara Only A Dream As a little girl I dreamed of marrying a professional football player. They invoke a protective quality I missed out on because of my relationship with my father. Last month I believed I was on the way to having my dream come true. When I went for dinner and drinks with my cousin, we were approached by a security guard who said this football player wanted to meet me. I was excited and quickly obliged the request. That week we spent hours together going to lunch, dinner, a bar, and even a walk in the park. The night before he left town I spent the night with him. He was a complete gentleman, and I remained a lady at all times so nothing happened. The next day he asked if I would visit him, and I said sure. Later that evening he asked me to meet him at the airport. I could not because of a family function, but I asked him to let me know if he got home safe. That was the last conversation we had. He has not called, emailed, or even sent a text message. Did I take the friendly gestures as meaning too much, or should I accept it for what it's worth? Stephanie Stephanie, he behaved like a complete gentleman, but perhaps he wasn't looking for a lady. Remaining a lady allows you to keep this encounter as a pleasant memory. Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

How Clutter Causes Problems

How Clutter Causes Problems By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Have you ever walked into a home, or even a single room, and wondered, "How do these people live in such a mess?" Collecting and holding onto too much stuff causes many problems – economic, social, and emotional. It is not a common way to assess your health. But having a look at your home is an interesting diagnostic tool. “Cluttering” can be expensive. About 11% of American households rent a storage unit at an average monthly cost of $85. Nearly half of self-storage customers rent for a year or more, costing over a thousand dollars! Some nationalities are more compulsive about clutter. For instance, Germans and Swedes seem less inclined to pile up unused things. The Swedes have a saying that stresses you should not leave a mess for others to clean up. They call it "death cleaning". Studies show that clutter breeds emotional chaos for some people. A study at Princeton University showed that with too much stuff around, the brain is unable to process information well. Another study from the University of California revealed that clutter can have an adverse effect on hormones. For instance, women who live with a mess did not show the normal decrease in the stress hormone, cortisol, that usually occurs during the course of a day. Moreover, they experienced an increase in depressed mood. In some cases, living in a mess means social isolation stemming from the embarrassment of friends not able to get in the door for all the mess. A messy home can also lead to falls. Getting older is a dangerous process. Seniors are less agile, and vision deteriorates. Tripping over a mess can cause a fractured hip or other serious injuries. For messy households, there is nothing like the workload that comes when parents move into retirement homes. This topic doesn’t feature in my new book about Healthy Retirement Residence Living, but that’s my oversight. Fortunately, my own family does not have this problem, but the tales are legendary of families who must sort through room after room of “stuff” collected over a lifetime. If you’ve decided it's time to get rid of clutter, there’s good news. Decluttering does make people feel psychologically better. It provides a sense of accomplishment and well-being. Equally important, decluttering gives people a sense of personal control, lowering stress. If getting rid of clutter is good for you, why don't more people do it? There are lots of reasons. Are people too busy? Is there just too much stuff? Does procrastination win? Just as a voyage of a thousand miles begins with the first step, the best thing is to just get started. Set small goals, so you don't become overwhelmed before you even begin. Experts in decluttering offer sage advice. Sort your things into three broad categories, “Keep, Discard, and Maybe”. Then repeat with the "Maybe" stuff as many times as needed. Break the work into small chunks of time. Spending 30 minutes on one task is enough, so you don't get overtired or bored and say, "What's the use?" Remember that deciding to clean up a mess means the clutter has to go somewhere. This is a time when you can make less fortunate people happy. Donate clothing, electronics, books, furniture, and other items to The Salvation Army, Goodwill, and other charitable organizations. Hmm. I can just hear my wife saying, "So Giff, when are you going to toss out those old shoes?" But like old wine, I find it hard to say goodbye to old shoes. They remain on my "Maybe" list.Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

PICKERING FORWARD

PICKERING FORWARD By Maurice Brenner Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering Having attended the PICKERING FORWARD Planning Department Open House Townhall as part of the Policy Development for a New Pickering Official Plan on February 6th at the George Ashe CC, this transformative session was nothing less than impressive. About 40 members of communities from across Pickering turned out and took part in meaningful discussions that focussed on sustainability and the natural environment. Some of the key highlights raised by residents stressed the importance of protecting community character along the Kingston Road corridor. Things such as wide multi-purpose Bvds that are pedestrian friendly, with regard for architectural design controls that enables a blend of structural forms. Another important item, was the need to better understand the impact of removing all trees during development through an environmental lens to ensure appropriate mitigating options are explored. As Pickering continues to move forward with growth in Central Pickering, the redevelopment along Kingston Road and infill, I will do my utmost to bring these and other important items to the table always keeping in mind, that what ever we do today will impact tomorrow., During the coming weeks PICKERING FORWARD will launch its next phase of this implant policy review of our Official Plan. And while there was some scepticism that voices may not be heard, the Planning Team assured them that everything was on the table and deemed important. To learn more about PICKERING FORWARD, check out www.pickering.ca/Pickeringforward

Politics in Pickering: When Transparency Takes a Back Seat to Theatrics

Politics in Pickering: When Transparency Takes a Back Seat to Theatrics By Lisa Robinson Think politics is boring? Not in Pickering! Our meetings have become a kind of reality TV - maybe even worthy of Netflix - with plot twists, dramatic outbursts, and a lot of conspiracy accusations thrown in for good measure. At our executive meeting last Monday February 3, 2025, I opened with questions directed at our Director of IT, Dale Quaif, and took a moment to flash back to last years February 5th, 2024 executive meeting. Back then, we used tax payers dollars of nearly $180,000.00 paid to MNP Digital to assess Digital Readiness and assessment strategy. The consultants confidently reported to Council that The Corporation of The City of Pickering boasted an extensive privacy and cybersecurity plan to protect residents’ personal online data. Sounds great, right? Wrong—it turned out to be nothing more than a complete lie. Because immediately after the consultants made this claim, I pressed our IT Director Mr. Quaif on the specifics of what measures were in place to protect our residents’ online personal data, and he painfully admitted there was nothing. Yes, you read that correctly… Nothing! He did, however, offer the promise that cybersecurity would eventually become part of our digital transition journey. Fast forward to February 3 of this year ‘2025—almost exactly a full year later—I found myself asking the same pointed question: What, if anything, has changed? After an exercise in political dodging, the answer was as stark as it was simple: nothing. There has been no implementation of new software or security measures. Instead, we were met with vague references to policies and procedures, legislation, two-factor authentication, and a records retention policy—a list of buzzwords without any concrete action behind them. I suggested that it would be a colossal waste of money to continually spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on new software when our IT Director doesn’t even have a clear grasp of our current list of software inventory—or whether any new purchases would even be compatible with what we already have. That’s when the Mayor lost it. While the Mayor was yelling at me and verbally abusing me, another councillor could not control her laughter. He accused my line of questioning of being deeply disrespectful and highly inappropriate, taking offense at my use of the word “waste” and my comment that our “IT Director should know our list of software inventory.” According to him, my terminology was grossly offensive. He went on to further abuse and insult me, claiming that there isn’t a conspiracy theory around every corner. In a childlike tantrum, the Mayor even labeled me a conspiracy theorist—while ironically disrespecting the Chair, the very rules he continually accuses me of violating. Once again, we witnessed the classic “rules for thee, but not for me” behavior... Apparently, pointing out poor planning and fiscal mismanagement is offensive to the Mayor. And here's the kicker: the so-called “conspiracy” is clearly laid out in black and white on MNP Digital's strategy plan—a $179,670.00 bill paid with your property tax dollars. Some conspiracy!

Political bull fighting 101 -

‘opah che’ those are not my horns You are Grabbing - political bull fighting 101 - By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States Rule number one at the school of bull fighters. Make sure that if you are going to grab the bull by the horns.... that you are facing the right end of the bull. In Canada we are being played.... with all the bull in Canadian politics... The new American bull fighter is ‘Oleing’ us right and left. Canada wake up... News reports keep coming regarding Trumps threat on imposing tariffs on Canadian goods. Some claim that Canada should take a tough stand against the U.S. threat on the implementation of tariffs. Making statements like ‘cut their power source’ from Canada. Other claim that we should do nothing. Even some are claiming that we should play it safe and go dollar for dollar on any tariff imposed. In the eleventh hour..... The American matador (bull fighter) did what he does best when the beast charges.... Ole... and there we go for another day of feet stomping getting us no place. We, the wild raging savage that we are... have no direction. No real plan and act out of raw survival instincts. We see red by the mere show of a red threat to our economies. We threaten retaliation only to hope to be grabbed by the horns and develop some sort of strong hold and push back strategy. In reality the great America bull fighter is playing us a fool by showing us the red cape meanwhile walking us around the arena by not our horns but our cojones. Leading us from one insecurity right to another. Another 30 days. Canada with a part time Prime MInister. With one of the most dissatrous leaders in history....How are we as Canadians ever to stand a change against the American matador? The media reported that we are such bad ass...that we banned American liquor from our store.... WOW... WE BAD ASS. Then to ad insult to injury.... The media reports that we have no real plan on how to collect the 25% tariff at the border. WOW. People talk of Canadian pride. Of Canadian identity. Yet, we have no political identity, our culture has been compromised by those we are compassionate and importing by the millions. Our customs and traditions are constantly under scrutiny in order to accept so that we are not seen as racists. We are easy picking for the matador. We are a controlled beast and we do not even know it. When we become the 51st we may have to change our ‘Oh Canada’ in our national anthem to ‘Ole Canada’...Lets wake up and see what is really happening before it is to late for Canada. Best attack is a solid defense. Think about it. Stop the bull fight mentality and to do nothing is doing something. Those are not our horns they are grabbing. Let the Matador fizz out. Let’s take control of our own country.

Impending Tariffs and Trade War Clouds Looming Between the United States and Canada

Impending Tariffs and Trade War Clouds Looming Between the United States and Canada by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East U.S. President Donald Trump seemed to have made good on his threats to impose tariffs on last Saturday, when he signed an executive order that would impose levies of 25 percent on all imports from Canada and Mexico, except for Canadian energy, which would face a tariff of 10 percent. The order included a provision to trigger even higher tariffs if the targets of the order respond with tariffs of their own. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau quickly responded by announcing a package of retaliatory tariffs. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum also vowed to retaliate. Following last-minute negotiations, however, both Canada and Mexico were able to secure a 30-day delay on the imposition of the American tariffs. Clearly, the situation is fluid. While a temporary pause is better than nothing, the threat remains. If the full extent of Trump’s tariffs are eventually implemented, there is a real risk that these actions could spark a trade war the likes of which have not been seen since the Great Depression. Consider the facts for Canada: 77% of our exports are to the United States, and only 17% of the United States’ exports are to Canada. Is that a position of equal strength? Aside from the massive difference in economic strength, at this crucial moment Canada is in a very weak position politically. Coping with the stress of these tariffs with a prorogued parliament, a Prime Minister who has resigned, and a Liberal leadership contest in place to replace him by March 9 all attest to a lack of the strong leadership that is now needed. To add to the political instability, the biggest Province, Ontario, is involved in an early election process. An election called by Premier Doug Ford who was looking to hang onto power for four more years. This election is not about the interest of Ontarians and Canadians, but an entirely self-interested move. It is sad to see all of Canada’s political leaders running in circles, unprepared for the dark future ahead, uttering empty threats, totally oblivious to the grave consequences Canada is about to face due to their childish posturing and total lack of leadership. For Canada, the impact will be severe: a 25 percent tariff on all goods and a 10 percent tariff on energy. Together, these cover roughly 80 percent of the $600 billion in exports we send to the U.S. each year. While these tariffs are not a direct tax on Canadians, the effects will be felt through reduced demand for our goods. Although we will get a clearer picture in the coming days, some quick calculations outlined by knowledgeable experts reveal just how significant the economic hit could be. If U.S. demand drops in proportion to the tariff it will translate to a $160 billion blow to Canada’s economy—$100 billion in direct losses and another $60 billion in upstream effects. The pain varies a lot across sectors. Vehicle manufacturing, mostly in Ontario, could see demand fall by more than 15 percent, with some subsectors approaching a staggering 25 percent decline. These estimates likely underestimate significantly, the broader disruption to supply chains that crisscross the border. Nevertheless, Ford is campaigning on an attitude of reckless retaliation, threatening to withdraw US liquor from the LCBO government owned stores and tearing up a contract worth 100 million dollars with Elon Musk’s company, Starlink. He is clearly not thinking either of the broader consequences, or the cost that has already been incurred. (Liquor we have already bought, the cost of breaking a contract….) Obviously, the taxpayers will be stuck with the tab. So, Ford is fiddling while Ontario burns, eh? Other manufacturing industries, mostly in Quebec, would face an average demand drop of about 10 percent, while the resource and agriculture sectors would see declines of around 8 percent. Even industries not directly targeted by tariffs, like services, would take a hit. While the impact on services may seem modest, this sector makes up the bulk of Canada’s economy, a unique position to be in among G7 countries. If these output losses translate proportionally to employment, Canada could see roughly 600,000 fewer jobs, potentially pushing the unemployment rate up to nearly 10 percent. However, this is a rough estimate and losses would take some time to materialize. In response to US tariffs, Canada is threatening to hit back with its own tariffs starting at 25 percent on $30 billion in U.S. goods and expanding to $155 billion in just three weeks. That covers about one-third of what we import from the U.S. While some specifics are still unclear, this appears to be the most extensive retaliation the government could impose without targeting imports essential to our own industries. The former account for about one-third of total Canadian imports from the U.S. Unfortunately, retaliation will only hurt the U.S. slightly, while it will hurt the Canadian economy substantially. Moreover, the pain for Canada will come more quickly than if there is no retaliation, as the initial drop in our GDP will be more than twice as large. Unlike Trump’s tariffs, which will hit all Canadian products, Canada’s planned retaliation will hit consumer goods, but not the intermediate inputs imported by Canadian producers. Make no mistake. This is still a tax increase on Canadians, one that will further slow our economy. By stopping of a strict dollar-for-dollar escalation for the moment short, policymakers have at least avoided inflicting even greater damage on Canadian businesses and consumers. Let’s now hope that economic pain on both sides of the border forces a rethink by the U.S. administration before the damage becomes permanent. As we are at the early stages of this crisis, some interesting developments are likely to follow in the near future. The question is, how can win-win solutions be achieved to the problems Canada faces at present? Saddled at the helm with a thoughtless, mindless, desperately weak political class composed primarily of elected former political staffers with no business experience, dare we hope for a strong, astute, economically knowledgeable outsider to emerge as leader? For now, we have 30 days to act.

Staying Safe in a Politically Divided World: 10 Tips for Personal Security

Staying Safe in a Politically Divided World: 10 Tips for Personal Security By Dale Jodoin In today’s world, expressing political beliefs has become a dangerous game. Some people can openly share their opinions with little to no consequence, while others face harassment, job loss, or even physical violence simply for supporting the "wrong" side. This is not how democracy is supposed to work. Everyone should have the right to voice their opinions without fear, but reality tells a different story. Across Canada and the United States, we see a troubling pattern. Conservatives, moderates, and even classical liberals are facing increasing hostility, while radical left-wing groups—often called the "woke mob" or "alt-left"—are given free rein to protest, riot, and silence opposition. The media downplays their actions, and politicians hesitate to take strong action against them. Meanwhile, those on the right face swift consequences for even minor infractions. The border crisis is the latest example of this political imbalance. For months, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and U.S. President Joe Biden refused to take meaningful action to secure their borders, despite overwhelming public demand for stricter immigration enforcement. When finally forced to act—due to pressure from foreign governments—they were hesitant and slow. Instead of acknowledging that border security is about national protection, the Liberal and NDP coalition in Canada labeled concerned citizens as "racist" for wanting immigration controls. The truth is, securing a nation’s borders is not about race; it is about safety, economic stability, and national sovereignty. While Trudeau and his government reluctantly acted on border security, fringe left-wing groups continue to operate unchecked. These radical activists target individuals, businesses, and public officials who do not align with their ideology. They justify physical attacks, online harassment, and even doxing (publishing private information to incite threats). They claim to fight for justice, but in reality, they operate more like political enforcers—punishing dissent while enjoying government protection. This article is not about inciting fear but about preparation. Whether you are a conservative, a moderate, or even a traditional liberal who no longer fits into today’s progressive mold, it is essential to stay vigilant. Below are ten critical tips to protect yourself in this increasingly divided political climate. 10 Tips for Staying Safe in Today’s Political Climate 1. Be Aware of Your Surroundings The first rule of personal safety is awareness. When in public, always pay attention to your environment. If you notice tensions rising, a crowd forming, or aggressive behavior escalating, remove yourself before trouble starts. Watch for body language—clenched fists, raised voices, or groups surrounding individuals are warning signs. 2. Avoid Wearing Political Symbols in PublicWhile you have every right to express your political beliefs, doing so can make you a target. Political hats, shirts, or bumper stickers may attract unwanted attention. If you’re in an area known for political activism, especially left-wing strongholds, consider leaving your political apparel at home. Safety should always take priority over making a statement. 3. Travel in Groups There is strength in numbers. If you find yourself in a politically charged area, do not go alone. Walking with friends or family makes you a less likely target for harassment or assault. Groups are harder to intimidate, and someone watching your back can make all the difference in a dangerous situation. 4. Keep Your Phone Ready Always have your phone fully charged and easily accessible. If you feel unsafe, call someone you trust or, if necessary, contact law enforcement. Recording incidents can provide valuable evidence if you are ever harassed or attacked. However, avoid provoking a confrontation by visibly filming someone—this can escalate tensions. 5. Know Your Escape Routes Whether at a public event, protest area, or even just in a busy city center, always have an exit plan. Be aware of nearby streets, open stores, or secure buildings where you can seek refuge. If in a building, locate the nearest exits in case you need to leave quickly. 6. Stay Calm and Avoid Engaging in Arguments Political debates can quickly turn hostile. If someone confronts you aggressively, the best course of action is to disengage. Shouting back will only escalate the situation. If you feel trapped, calmly walk away and remove yourself from the situation. There is no shame in prioritizing your safety over winning an argument. 7. Learn Basic Self-Defense Violence should always be a last resort, but knowing how to defend yourself is crucial. You do not need to be a martial arts expert, but learning how to block attacks, escape grabs, or use basic self-defense maneuvers can make a significant difference in an emergency. Many local gyms and community centers offer affordable self-defense courses. 8. Avoid Isolated Areas If tensions are high in your community, stick to well-populated areas with security cameras and witnesses. Avoid dark alleys, quiet side streets, or empty parks—especially at night. If you suspect someone is following you, enter a public space like a store or café instead of heading straight home. 9. Be Careful What You Post Online In today's digital world, people have lost jobs, faced harassment, and even been physically targeted for their social media activity. If you post about politics, be mindful of who might see it. Consider adjusting your privacy settings so that only trusted friends can access your content. If you face online harassment, document it but avoid engaging—do not give your attackers more ammunition. 10. Have a Plan to Reach a Safe Place If you ever feel unsafe, know where to go. If you cannot rely on the police in your area due to political bias, identify alternative safe zones. This could be a friend’s house, a local business, or a community center. If you suspect you are being followed, do not drive directly home—go to a well-lit public place and contact someone you trust. The political divide in Canada and the U.S. is growing deeper, and it is not conservatives who are benefiting from the chaos. Radical leftist groups continue to operate without consequence, while anyone who challenges their ideology faces public backlash, job loss, or even legal consequences. The Trudeau government has repeatedly ignored the concerns of the majority. It took international pressure to finally address border security, and even then, they acted reluctantly. Meanwhile, anyone who dared question the government’s inaction was smeared as a "racist" or "bigot." This is a disturbing trend—where citizens expressing common-sense concerns are attacked rather than heard. At the same time, fringe left-wing groups remain a threat. These activists push extreme policies in schools, workplaces, and the media. They justify violence, censorship, and intimidation tactics, all while claiming to be the true defenders of democracy. But democracy is not about silencing opponents—it is about allowing open discussion and respecting diverse viewpoints. We live in dangerous times, but fear should never prevent you from standing up for what you believe in. Democracy depends on free speech, and no one—no matter their political beliefs—should live in fear of violence or persecution. This article is not about paranoia. It is about preparation. By staying alert, avoiding unnecessary risks, and knowing how to protect yourself, you can continue to express your beliefs safely. Do not let radical voices silence you. Freedom is worth defending. Stay aware, stay safe, and never stop standing up for your rights.

DEMOCRATIC LOOPHOLE

DEMOCRATIC LOOPHOLE By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States Premier Doug Ford confirmed that the Honorable Edith Dumont, Lieutenant Governor of Ontario, has accepted the premier's advice to sign a proclamation dissolving the 43rd Parliament of the Province of Ontario. Pursuant to the provisions of the Election Act, the Lieutenant Governor also called for the issuance of writs for the general election to be issued January 29, 2025, and named February 27, 2025, as the date of Ontario's next general election. What political arrogance. By Ford calling an election he is pretty much solidifying his complete control over Ontario. The ultimate political goal. To have total and complete control. To eliminate opposition and to exercise a strong hand tactics against your opponents. Hum. Does it not sound like what is taking place south of the border? Ford, by calling an election is assuring total control of the Province. He knows that the NDP does not have a chance in hell. The Liberals are about to be pushed off the Canadian political horizon. This snap election is nothing short of an abuse of the democratic process. A process that is in place to allow the common folk to exercise their right to vote in who they think it is worthy of the position. Unfortunately, this has been compromise and undermined in order to gain total and complete control over the population. Ford, in the past has shown great initiative in championing the interest of those he represents. Across the province. The Blue tide is about to roll over all Liberal standing posts. Locally Jerry Ouellette is being pulled from the PC stables in the hope that the name recognition will regain the post as he once did. Jerry is a great person. As our MPP he was always accessible and most importantly listened to constituents. On the other hand. We had to endure Jennifer French since 2014. She does not return phone calls. She has not once supported this newspaper. She is never available for interviews and events. It almost appears that once elected she shut down the community. This is not representation. This is not why constituents voted her in. I am eager to see the outcome in this race... Thomas Sowell said it best, “By the end of the 20th century, “liberals” had again discredited themselves, to the point where they went back to calling themselves “progressives” to escape their past, much as people do when they declare bankruptcy.” If this stands true. The time has come. Much like it is happening in the United States. Society is about to re-set. Are you ready?

A human tragedy that must never happen again

A human tragedy that must never happen again by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East As we deal with a new conflagration in Europe and its many victims, we need to reflect for a moment on the human tragedy of cataclysmic proportion that happened during WW2, and hope that this kind of thing will never happen again. On May 8, 1945, Winston Churchill announced that the Allies had secured Victory in Europe. Later that year, Japan would finally surrender, and World War II would end. It is hard to believe that in 2025, we will mark the 80th Anniversary of the end of World War II; a tragedy that was the most devastating event of the last century. This war was the deadliest military conflict in human history. An estimated 70 to 85 million people perished in it; or about 3% of the world population in 1940. The World War II conflagration saw very high civilian casualties. Civilian deaths totaled 50 to 55 million. Of this, the victims of genocide and ethnic cleansing numbered close to 25 million. Around 17 million perished as victims of Nazi Germany and its collaborators, and 7.6 million were victims of the communist rule in the Soviet Union. The ferocity of Nazi killings was motivated by the idea of ethnic cleansing. These racially motivated crimes included the persecution of Roma and the handicapped, the murder of Soviet prisoners of war, Polish and Soviet civilians, as well as political prisoners, religious dissenters, and homosexuals, adding to the number of innocent victims of war. In January 1942, top Nazi leaders convened in the outer lakeside Berlin suburb of Wannsee to outline the “Final Solution of the Jewish Question in Europe”, without regard for geographic boundaries. In total, 11 million Jews would be targeted for extermination. Without a whimper, the thirteen officials signed off on the ‘Final Solution’. The minutes would record their decision to ‘cleanse the German living space of Jews in a legal manner’. This marked the darkest seminal moment in a series of events that would see the murder of 6 million Jews, an abhorrence beyond comprehension in our modern, comfortable lives. The Holocaust is the term generally used to describe the genocide of approximately six million European Jews during World War II. Entire families, old men and women and young children were killed in the Nazi extermination camps by ferocious and inhumane methods. According to Polish Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) researchers, 2,830,000 Jews were murdered in the Nazi death camps (500,000 in Belzec; 150,000 in Sobibor; 850,000 in Treblinka; 150,000 in Chelmno; 1,100,000 in Auschwitz and 80,000 in Majdanek. In the Nazi occupied territory of the USSR the Nazi Einsatzgruppen killed another 1.4 million Jewish people by mobile gas chambers and mass executions. Eighty years ago, on 27 January 1945, Soviet soldiers from the 60th Army of the First Ukrainian Front advanced into Poland and liberated Auschwitz. There, amid mountains of corpses, they discovered about 7,650 men, women and children, starving, stricken by disease, barely living. They also found hundreds of thousands of personal effects, and 700 tons of human hair. These broken human beings were among the handful of survivors of the 1.3 million people who had passed through the gates of Auschwitz. In November 2005, the United Nations General Assembly proclaimed 27 January 1945, the day on which Auschwitz was liberated, as International Remembrance Day to mark the tragedy of the Holocaust. It commemorates the genocide that resulted in the deaths of 6 million Jews and 11 million others, by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. It urges every member nation of the U.N. to honour the memory of Holocaust victims, and encourages the development of educational programs about Holocaust history to help prevent future acts of genocide. It condemns all manifestations of religious intolerance, incitement, harassment or violence against persons or communities based on ethnic origin or religious belief. The International Day in memory of the victims of the Holocaust is thus a day on which we must reassert our commitment to human rights. We must also go beyond remembrance, and make sure that new generations know this history. We must apply the lessons of the Holocaust to today’s world. After the horrors of the 20th century, there should be no room for intolerance in the 21st. The only way to honour the memory of the Holocaust is to turn remembrance into the promise of a better future. Preserving and transmitting the memory is a duty towards those who lost their lives, and towards our children. In commemorating the dead, we are inspired by the triumph of the human spirit given us by those who survived. "Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it." Winston Churchill A nation that does not know nor understand its history, is dangerous. Life’s paradox is that often it is those things, most important to us, that we have a tendency to take for granted. We are fortunate as Canadians, whether by birth or by choice, to enjoy political, economic and religious freedoms. To live in a nation in which faith coexists with reason, free academic inquiry, a free press and independent judiciary is a blessing and we need to preserve it. And yet support for democracy is diminishing. We are defined most by our values and our beliefs, the way we relate to one another and see our place in the world. We are shaped by our heroes and villains, our triumphs and failures. The way as a people we have faced adversity and how we will face the inevitable adversities that are coming. How we respond to them will shape our future. Nations, like people, face ‘moments of truth’. There are moments in history which challenge our very survival and values. Well led, we emerge stronger, more resilient. Under poor leadership, we may suffer lasting damage. Six million Jews were murdered in an act of unspeakable genocidal barbarism. So too were homosexuals, Roma, the disabled and political dissidents. In a world grappling with the mass movement of people, the persecution of political, ethnic and religious minorities, the push for euthanasia and a generational struggle against resurgent religious extremism, we must remind ourselves not only of why we fought wars but also what human kind is capable of, and the circumstances that lead to it. Today we live in vast ignorance of the decisions we make and that are made for us, facing extraordinary global uncertainty and immense technological change. No human being, no Canadian who believes in the dignity of man, of freedom and democratic principles, should ever allow the Holocaust to be forgotten through neglectful indifference; that the events, the people, their lives and stories, become distant strangers. These heinous events and those who survived them teach us many things. Most importantly they inspire us to have the moral courage, irrespective of personal consequences, to act on what, in our hearts, we know to be right. “It is not often that nations learn from the past, even rarer that they draw the correct conclusions from it.” ? Henry Kissinger Are we ready to do it right?

Exposing More Lies & Corruption: The Truth About Pickering’s Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT)

Exposing More Lies & Corruption: The Truth About Pickering’s Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) By Lisa Robinson Today, I’m speaking out because I’m tired of the lies, manipulation, and deceit coming from some council members and city staff. What happened during the January 13th Executive Committee meeting is a prime example of why trust in government continues to erode. During that meeting, staff recommended implementing a 4% Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) on hotels and motels in Pickering. They justified it by claiming that 'many' municipalities had already adopted the tax, but here’s the truth: only 15 out of 444 municipalities have done so—that’s just 3.4%. Calling that 'many' is not only inaccurate, it's a lie designed to manipulate public perception. That kind of intentional distortion is corruption, plain and simple. I asked our Director of Economic Development, Mr. Fiaz Jadoon, whether hotels and motels had been consulted. He assured me that they had and claimed there were no significant concerns. Based on that assurance, the vote passed 6-1 and was set to return to Council on January 27th. I of course, was the dissenting vote. But here’s where it gets worse. At the January 27th Council meeting, I asked the same question again. This time, Mr. Jadoon once again claimed that all hotels had been consulted. I pushed back because I had done my homework—and I had a different answer. Only then did the Mayor finally admit, reading from what looked like a script, that the higher-ups at our biggest hotel—Great Canadian Gaming—had not been consulted and even confirmed they were not on board with charging this new tax. So let me ask you: Why did the Mayor allow this lie to continue? Why didn’t the truth come out until I exposed it? If I hadn’t challenged them, that false information would have stood as fact. And this isn’t the first time this has happened. When I was first elected, Mr. Jadoon claimed that businesses along Kingston Road had been consulted about development plans. Once again, I did my research, and once again, I discovered that it was a complete lie. This pattern of dishonesty is not a mistake—it’s deliberate. And that’s why I keep asking questions and pushing back. Because if I don’t, who will? Thankfully, Councillor Cook seconded my motion to send this tax proposal back to staff for proper consultation. But let’s be clear: two members of Council actually voted against delaying the vote, even after knowing our largest hotel was not supportive. The Mayor, Councillor Nagy, and Mr. Jadoon all argue that a 4% tax increase is insignificant, but when combined with other taxes, it totals a 17% increase—a significant burden on businesses and consumers, especially when people are already struggling to make ends meet. Lying to the public to manipulate outcomes is corruption. And I won’t stand by and let it happen. I’ve already lost three months of pay for daring to say that corruption starts at the top. And here we are—proof that it does. I am Councillor Robinson, 'The People’s Councillor,' and I will continue to fight for transparency, honesty, and the people of Pickering. I am Councillor Lisa Robinson, The People’s Councillor

FORD’S $189M ELECTION GAMBLE: A BID FOR POWER, NOT THE PEOPLE

FORD’S $189M ELECTION GAMBLE: A BID FOR POWER, NOT THE PEOPLE By Sami Parvez Ontario Premier Doug Ford has called an early provincial election, citing the need for a stronger majority amidst threats from Trump’s tariffs. However, the reality seems different — with his party already leading strongly in the polls, Ford appears eager to capitalize on this political advantage. Like many politicians intoxicated by power, whether prime ministers or premiers, they often seek to extend their rule indefinitely. Many politicians often prioritize political gains over taxpayer interests. On January 28, Ford met with Lt.-Gov. Edith Dumont to dissolve the Ontario Legislature and call an early provincial election, costing taxpayers $189 million. The election will take place on Thursday, February 27, making it Ontario’s first winter election since 1883. For the past year, there had been speculation that Ford would call an early election, and he never ruled it out. Finally, he called the election, and taxpayers will pay the price. The $189 million could be better spent on healthcare, addressing the housing crisis, or supporting homeless individuals. According to Feed Ontario, A hunger-relief organization and advocacy group focused on ending hunger and poverty through fresh food delivery, innovative programs, and research-driven change through research and advocacy, "40% of food banks have reduced the amount of food they provide, and half have been forced to cut wrap-around services amid record-high demand and resource shortages. There was a 25% increase in the use of food banks in Ontario compared to 2023, marking the eighth consecutive year of growth." Ford’s Progressive Conservative Party already holds a large majority, with 79 out of 124 seats. Despite this, he is still not satisfied. This is not about securing a larger majority but about keeping his job for the next four years. For the past nine years, the Liberals have been in power at the federal level, but they are now trailing their main rivals, the Conservatives, by over 20 points in the polls. Ford isn’t willing to take any risks, anticipating that the federal Conservatives will likely secure a majority in the next election. If they falter during their first term, his government could suffer the consequences in 2026 if the election remains on its fixed date. "When the tariffs hit, it affects the media, it affects manufacturing, it affects every single sector in this province," Ford told reporters on Jan. 24. "So you better pray that we get elected, because I'm going to protect everyone's job, including the media's job." Ford presents himself as the only leader capable of dealing with Trump. He attacked his main rivals, NDP Leader Marit Stiles and Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie, during a campaign-style news conference in Brampton, Ont., on Jan. 24. Mocking his opponents during a Jan. 24 news conference, he said: "Imagine Bonnie Crombie or Marit Stiles sitting across from President Trump negotiating a deal. It would be an absolute disaster. And God help us if that ever happens." According to polling aggregator 338Canada.com, if an election were held today, the Progressive Conservatives (PC) would win a historic 45% of the vote, securing 99 seats. The Ontario Liberals would follow with 26% of the vote, earning 8 seats, while the NDP would capture 21% of the vote and 14 seats. The Ontario Greens are projected to receive 6% of the vote, winning 2 seats. Additionally, an independent candidate could also secure a seat in the Ontario Legislature. “Right now, President Trump has put uncertainty to every single Canadian, a lot of other countries around the world, and this isn’t going to happen overnight. It may not happen Feb. 1, I’m sure something’s coming, but this is going to be a battle for the next four years, and I want to make sure that I have a strong mandate to outlast President Trump,” Ford told the media after the writ was dropped on Tuesday Jan. 28. Ontario opposition leaders accuse Ford of calling an early election for political gain, arguing that it is unnecessary and a waste of taxpayer money on the on the first day of election campaign on Wednesday, Jan. 29. We should be here at Queen’s Park, working across party lines to show strength through unity in the face of Donald Trump’s threats. Instead, Doug Ford has called an election, abandoning the people of Ontario when they need him the most,” Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said in a speech at Queen’s Park on Wednesday, “Clearly, Doug Ford cares more about his job than he does about yours.” “We are here today because Doug Ford doesn’t care about you. Because he has decided to spend $175 million on an election we don’t need, rather than spending that money on getting you a family doctor or on anything to make your life a little easier,” Crombie said in Barrie on Wednesday, slamming Ford for calling an early election in a key riding the Liberals aim to flip from the PCs. In her campaign launch in downtown Toronto on Wednesday, NDP Leader Marit Stiles mocked Ford’s ability as a negotiator. “Doug Ford as our negotiator, are you kidding?” Stiles said. “Time and time again, Doug Ford has shown he can’t negotiate his way out of a paper bag.” Ford is using the threat of Trump’s tariffs as an excuse for calling an early election, even though U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that Canada cannot prevent the tariffs set to take effect on Feb. 1. This makes Ford’s justification for spending $189 million on an unnecessary election even weaker. Ontarians need stronger government support to secure necessities such as food, healthcare, shelter, and economic stability. They don’t want one person to cling to power indefinitely. Ontarians deserve better governance, true leadership, and greater accountability. It’s time for the government to put citizens’ well-being ahead of political gains. Ford's decision proves he is more focused on power than on addressing Ontario's real crises.

The Open House

The Open House By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist Everyone loves an open house, or do they? When you have your home listed for sale, a common method of advertising it is to hold an open house. An open house is where you choose a couple of, or a few hours on a particular day or perhaps a couple of days, to throw open the doors and invite people in. The idea behind the open house is to have people that are in the market to purchase a home walk through, hopefully fall in love with your home and want to make an offer on it. The open house dates back several decades but like everything else has changed over the years. Back in the day it was more about just getting someone through the door because if they could just see the place, surely, they would love it. That was the mentality. Especially if a family had lived there and enjoyed it for many years. Back then the primary focus of the open house was to have the home itself clean as a whistle and make the home as inviting as possible. Today’s open house is more geared toward showing off the latest features and fabulous upgrades that have been made to the home over the years. To impress upon potential buyers the money that has been spent on maintaining and updating the home. Today’s open house is also a marketing boon for realtors. Now when you go to an open house, you need to sign in with your name and email address or your home address. This is both to protect the realtor and the homeowner, but it also serves as a marketing tool for the realtor. You are usually asked if you are working with a realtor. If you are not, you are asked if you would like to receive either a monthly communication which is generally a newsletter. If you say yes, you are now on a realtor’s email list and will be sent periodic communications, which is not a bad thing. A lot of people win great prizes and other things by allowing a realtor to send you information periodically. Most realtors are generally very generous and will spend time and money to nurture a relationship with someone who may use their services down the road. Holidays and special times of the year are usually when people see little gifts in their mailboxes or hanging from their door handle, from realtors. Often an open house is another opportunity for a realtor to promote their services by offering giveaways and branded materials at their open houses. While it is hoped that the open house will bring a buyer for that property, it doesn’t always. Just remember, when you see an open house sign, even if you are not looking at the moment, you are welcome to attend. See you there. Everyone loves an open house, or do they? When you have your home listed for sale, a common method of advertising it is to hold an open house. An open house is where you choose a couple of, or a few hours on a particular day or perhaps a couple of days, to throw open the doors and invite people in. The idea behind the open house is to have people that are in the market to purchase a home walk through, hopefully fall in love with your home and want to make an offer on it. The open house dates back several decades but like everything else has changed over the years. Back in the day it was more about just getting someone through the door because if they could just see the place, surely, they would love it. That was the mentality. Especially if a family had lived there and enjoyed it for many years. Back then the primary focus of the open house was to have the home itself clean as a whistle and make the home as inviting as possible. Today’s open house is more geared toward showing off the latest features and fabulous upgrades that have been made to the home over the years. To impress upon potential buyers the money that has been spent on maintaining and updating the home. Today’s open house is also a marketing boon for realtors. Now when you go to an open house, you need to sign in with your name and email address or your home address. This is both to protect the realtor and the homeowner, but it also serves as a marketing tool for the realtor. You are usually asked if you are working with a realtor. If you are not, you are asked if you would like to receive either a monthly communication which is generally a newsletter. If you say yes, you are now on a realtor’s email list and will be sent periodic communications, which is not a bad thing. A lot of people win great prizes and other things by allowing a realtor to send you information periodically. Most realtors are generally very generous and will spend time and money to nurture a relationship with someone who may use their services down the road. Holidays and special times of the year are usually when people see little gifts in their mailboxes or hanging from their door handle, from realtors. Often an open house is another opportunity for a realtor to promote their services by offering giveaways and branded materials at their open houses. While it is hoped that the open house will bring a buyer for that property, it doesn’t always. Just remember, when you see an open house sign, even if you are not looking at the moment, you are welcome to attend. See you there. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

SNIP DURHAM

SNIP DURHAM By Maurice Brenner Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering The theme for this months column and future columns will look at how our City is moving forward in a positive manner. While nothing is perfect, I believe that this is the best way to grow and attract business. On January 27th, Council held its first meeting of the year and it was a full agenda, including the adoption of the reports carried forward from the Executive meeting. These are some of the key highlights. The City of Pickering’s first Community Risk Assessment and Fire Master Plan was endorsed by Council. The plan is an important road map that will enable Pickering to meet the needs of residents and businesses and ensure our City has the necessary resources for staffing, equipment and facilities to keep pace with growth. The Plan was supported by the Pickering Fire Fighters Association whose President delegated in support of the Plan and its recommendations on behalf of its members. Pickering’s Fire Services has a dedicated team of Fire Fighters and along with its Leadership can always be counted on to keep our City safe. The final vote was 7:0 Another important agenda item makes it possible for the City to move forward on various financial housekeeping matters following the adoption of the 2025 Budget. With its passing, Council approved an increase to the 2025 Low Income Seniors & Persons with Disabilities Tax Grant amount, from $560 to $600 per household which helps to off set some of their economic pressures associated with the City of Pickering property tax. Attempts to provide a similar grant to offset the Regional portion is not been possible without the unanimous endorsement from all of the lower-tier Municipalities and has proven to be a challenge, as not every Municipality agrees with this. There was also approval for various grants to Community Organizations enabling them to continue the important work they are doing in our City such as the FoodBank, DARs, Pickering Islamic Centre, Pickering Rotary Club and others. The final vote was 6:1 Several important motions also passed, including the one I presented dealing with the lack of affordability of Veterinarian Care which has resulted in an increase of abandoned pet ending up in shelters, many of which have been left on roads and infields while others are just surrendered when owners can no longer afford to care for them. The Motion requested the Ontario Government to amend the necessary Legislation calling upon the Ontario Veterinarian College to review the impact of the rising cost and available options. With Ontario going to the polls February 27th this needs to be a topic at the doors as candidates look for votes. The final vote was 7:0 Another important motion passed was a request for a minor review by Watson and Associates (who previously conducted an Independent review of Ward Boundaries. Council) asking them to look at the boundary lines through lens of population and community features along with input from Community. The New Ward Boundaries are set to change for the October 2026 Municipal Elections. The final vote was 6:1 As a member of Pickering Council and Durham Region, I will continue to do my best to be a Strong Community Voice, advancing a positive agenda on your behalf. Watch for my next feature, a preview of what Pickering could look like in 2051.

Firestarter

Firestarter By Wayne & Tamara I've been with my girlfriend five years. We've had our share of ups and downs, but overall it's been the most rewarding relationship I could imagine. Recently everything was perfect. Then I went camping with my friend's girlfriend and alcohol was involved. made a very bad and unconscious decision to perform oral sex on her, which is all that happened. I just wasn't thinking. I never thought this could happen because I am not that kind of person. Afterwards I felt terrible. Although I had no emotional attachment to this girl, I felt I had done the worst possible thing. I told my girlfriend the next day, and now our relationship is on the brink of dissipating. I still love her and know in my heart we can work this out, but she doesn't want to talk to me right now. Jack Jack, when horror writer Stephen King was in high school, he was given a chance to be a sports reporter for his local newspaper. King had only one reservation: he knew nothing about sports. The editor of the paper, however, didn't see that as a problem. As he explained to Stephen, "These are games people understand when they're watching them drunk in bars. You'll learn if you try." You are trying to understand a game you played while drunk on a camping trip, and you are taking the high road in all this. Alcohol made you do it, so you are innocent there. It was only oral sex, so you are almost blameless there. And you confessed, so you are an honorable person. But you must have known when you confessed you were destroying your relationship in your girlfriend's mind and in her memory. You claim alcohol made you a different person against your character, values, and will. Some ancient, and not so ancient, cultures take a different view. Alcohol frees a person to be who they really are, or at least frees them to do what they seek to do. Often when a relationship reaches the three, five, or seven year mark, it's at a crossroads. It needs to become marriage or be over. Some inner voice is telling you to end it, but you won't face up to that, so you're going to force her to end it for you. The outer part of you is having a problem with this. But the inner part is driving this forward. If she lets it pass this time, your inner voice will force the issue again, and again your outer part will deny all responsibility for what is happening. Wayne & Tamara Fire Insurance I am a divorcée, living in India, in a relationship with a married guy. He is married with two kids, but still he loves me a lot. He tells me the reason he loves me so much is I am his first love. We have no plans of getting married. I want to come out of this relationship, yet at the same time I need him at least until I marry because I need a man in my life. Help me. If my family or his family comes to know about our relationship, it will be very embarrassing. I told him many times to stop talking to me, but he says at least until my marriage we can be friendly. I feel I need him at least until then, but what if we get caught? Rena Rena, there are people who eat fire, people who juggle flaming torches, and people who walk on burning coals. These people are all trained professionals. You haven't indicated you have any training with pyrotechnics, and as an amateur, you are likely to get scorched. Do you want to play with fire, or do you want a loving marriage? You know the risks. Playing with fire may torch your chances for a happy marriage. Wayne & Tamara Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

THE AMERICAN AGE OF AQUARIUS

By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States It is as if the heavens have parted and a fresh ray of American hope is beaming down upon the world and re-writing all the wrongs. In less than ten days Trump has made history on numerous fronts and changed American society like no one before. He has managed to send a message across the globe that things are about to change and to change fast. This is so refreshing. To finally see a leader with the right stuff. Getting rid of the wrong. Getting rid of greed and careered nobodies sitting in office pretending to be in touch with the common folk. So much change has long been needed across the world. scholars and intellectuals have been keeping an eye on a phenomenon in the horizon, that was unexplainable until now. It was believed to be of biblical, cosmic in proportion with a hit of good old lady luck magic. The bible told us of a man coming up the ranks to lead us. Others have said that the coming of a cosmic event was a matter of time. Others are now call it ‘The Age Of Aquarius’. What is the ‘Age of Aquarius’? The period from 2020 to 2026 marks a zone of significant transformations, a time of exceptional changes, and a substantial leap into a new era, “the Age of Aquarius. The Age of Aquarius is an astrological age that some believe is a time of social, political, and personal change. It's also a term used to describe the New Age movement of the 1960s and 1970s. Another view suggests that the rise of scientific rationalism, combined with the fall of religious influence, the increasing focus on human rights since the 1780s, the exponential growth of technology, plus the advent of flight and space travel, are evidence of the dawning of the age of Aquarius. Jesus was the one who announced the Age of Aquarius and said, “A man will meet you carrying an earthen pitcher of water; follow him into the house where he goes in”. Interesting... A man will meet you. Trump and his earthen pitcher of water. Water a fluid a pure, clear substance.... that may be interpreted as science and technology. Leading us to the White HOUSE. What changes will the age of Aquarius bring? The Aquarian Age is a time of great complexity as our sense of personal identity and our very foundation shifts. Expect developments in all arenas, including scientific discoveries, technological advancements, and societal shifts. On an individual level, change and learning will be lifelong and constant. Interesting if you give it a thought. We have Trump at the helm with interests in space. He has managed to partner up with Elon Musk. He is promising serious change and global supremacy. The American age of Aquarius is upon us. We need to embrace this shift back to humanity. Back to what makes sense and to what made the west the empire it was and is.