When Looking for a Job, Imagine Yourself as a Renter

When Looking for a Job, Imagine Yourself as a Renter By Nick Kossovan You don't own your job; your employer does, making the phrase "my job" an oxymoron. Layoffs illustrate that jobs belong to employers, not employees. In 2025, as layoffs remain prevalent and the economy becomes more unpredictable, job seekers, as if in denial, continue to equate finding a job with finding a permanent home. This mindset leads to prolonged job searches. Employees are renters; they rent their jobs until they no longer want them or until their employer no longer requires their services. Layoffs demonstrate that employers are the landlords of jobs. Essentially, being laid off is akin to being evicted. By adopting a renter's mindset, job seekers can shorten their job search and stop seeking what doesn't exist—a permanent employment situation. When renting, the primary goal is to have a roof over your head. Since renting isn't permanent, we tend to accept 'less-than-ideal' circumstances (neighbourhood, kitchen layout, bathroom size). Similarly, in job searching, 'less than ideal' circumstances could be a lower salary, working onsite, or a less prestigious company. On the other hand, homeownership, in which understandably ideal circumstances are sought, is a long-term commitment involving a significant financial outlay and is far more challenging than renting. When looking for a job, consider it as searching for a rental situation that meets your immediate needs rather than pursuing your ideal work situation, which you can always continue to seek. However, keep in mind that whether your job is merely to pay your bills or it's your supposed "dream job," you're renting your job. For the last 20 years, the gig economy has been a topic of discussion, emphasizing that employees rent their jobs. Now that the gig economy is here, and people lament the broken hiring system. NEWSFLASH: Since no two employers assess candidates in the same way, there is no universal hiring system; therefore, there is no "broken hiring system." Those who take their careers seriously are strategic. They don't waste time or energy complaining about the imbalance in the employer-employee relationship, especially regarding hiring. When a job posting attracts 1,000 applicants for a single opening, the 999 candidates not selected often blame everyone and everything except themselves, particularly those with a sense of entitlement. Today's job market, as AI eliminates white-collar and creative jobs, illustrates the interplay between supply and demand. The rapid progress of AI and automation is swiftly eroding job security. In 2025, whether we like it or not, all employees are, to some degree, part of the gig economy. The Myth of Permanence Renters understand that their lease will eventually end. Employees must realize that their job, or the one they're pursuing, will also end. Companies evolve, industries change, and geopolitical interests shift, as is happening now with tariffs. Economies fluctuate, and consumers are fickle in their tastes and demands, which means any job can disappear overnight. Approaching your job search with a renter's mentality helps you remain flexible and adaptable without succumbing to the pressure of expecting your next job to last until retirement. Truism: Nothing lasts forever. Short-Term Mindset, Long-Term Benefits When you view your job search through the lens of a renter, you prioritize short-term experiences over long-term commitments. Ask yourself: What skills do I need to develop and show a track record of having used to further my career? What experiences will enhance my resume? By focusing on these questions, you can identify roles that meet your immediate needs rather than getting bogged down in trying to find the "perfect" job. Truism: You can always change jobs. The Importance of Flexibility Renters typically have a more flexible mindset. They understand that their landlord may change their living situation and are prepared to adapt. This flexibility is crucial in today's job market. Instead of fixating on a single role or company, broaden your search. Consider contract, part-time, or freelance positions that can provide valuable experience and networking opportunities, often leading to full-time employment. Truism: Flexibility isn't just a trait; it's a survival skill. Setting Realistic Expectations Most renters understand that compromise is necessary; the same applies to job searching. It's okay not to land your dream job, which will likely be a temporary situation anyway. Have realistic expectations and recognize that obtaining your desired job may take time and require extra effort—such as networking, being active on LinkedIn, and attending relevant industry events—and your journey will likely include detours. Truism: Patience is a virtue. Embracing the Journey Renters understand they don't own their home; hence, it's not theirs and, therefore, not permanent. This understanding requires embracing the journey of discovering new neighbourhoods or interacting with evolving neighbours. Even though job searching can be stressful, when approached with curiosity and an open mind, it transforms into an opportunity to explore new possibilities and connect with new people. Every experience, whether positive or negative, contributes to your growth. Truism: Job searching, as in life, is about the journey, not just the destination. Adopting a renter's mindset acknowledges that all jobs are temporary and that employees are now part of the gig economy, encouraging a pragmatic job search strategy. You're not seeking permanence; you're actively looking for opportunities that align with your aspirations. Moreover, you recognize that you don't control employers; you only control your mindset ___________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

BIG GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO TAKE MORE OF YOUR MONEY SPEED CAMERAS RAISE $MILLIONS IN FINES

BIG GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO TAKE MORE OF YOUR MONEY SPEED CAMERAS RAISE $MILLIONS IN FINES IN A PREVIOUS COLUMN, I described what many over-burdened taxpayers see as the unrestrained liberty enjoyed by City and Regional governments to spend other people's money in ever increasing fashion, driven by an insatiable desire among bureaucrats and elected officials to advance what I like to call ‘Big Government’. This week we take a look at one method now being used by those in power to generate even more revenue to pay for their various spending schemes. SPEED CAMERAS - A CASH WINDFALL FOR MUNICIPAL COFFERS The Region of Durham website describes automated speed enforcement, or ASE, as being a “modern tool used to help enforce speed limits in school zones and community safety zones – places where kids tend to walk, run and play.” Permanent ASE devices are now in place throughout the region, including several locations within the city of Oshawa; most notably along the Simcoe Street corridor. In addition, mobile cameras are rotated regularly throughout the many community safety zones that have been established. The Region’s website describes all of this as being a part of their ‘Vision Zero’ plan to ensure a safer transportation system on local roads. It all sounds well intentioned, however, when you look at the incredible amount of revenue being generated in such a short time, you could be forgiven for taking this initiative as nothing more than an unjustified cash grab. One could go even further by suggesting the use of ASE devices is simply an attempt by municipalities to generate funds under the guise of ‘safety’ where no statistics have ever existed to warrant such a wide ranging initiative. In 2021, speed cameras in Durham Region brought in just shy of $4 million, and that revenue has been increasing year over year, although the actual ‘surplus’ has been slow to rise due to the cost of implementing the program. Fast forward to the 2024 fiscal year and you’ll see on the Region’s website they now anticipate an estimated surplus in the range of $2 million from last year's ASE operations. The Region has the effrontery to actually suggest the revenue generated by these speed cameras is simply “a byproduct of this enforcement” when in actual fact it’s the other way around. They even go on to inform residents of a plan to designate all roads with a 40km/h speed limit as “Community Safety Zones” enabling the prolific use of ASE cameras. This comes on the heels of a vote by Oshawa council to convert all residential neighbourhoods to 40 km/h speed limits in an 11-0 unanimous vote. Do you see a connection there? During the initial debate among councillors as to reducing overall speed limits, Ward 4 City councillor Derek Giberson had this to say: “I’m quite enthusiastic to be seconding this motion…and I do want to be sure we understand the report and the numbers…and what we have learned.” He went on to tell his colleagues, “I think there is a really important thing to be observed here…It’s the design of the road that determines driver behaviour. If it’s built for 60 km/h and it feels comfortable driving 60…you could put 10 km/h on a sign and you’re still going to have people driving 60. Posting a different speed limit doesn’t always result in the outcomes you want.” Councillor Giberson’s remarks go to the very heart of the issue, in that staff at both the Region of Durham and at Oshawa City hall know full well the accuracy of what the councillor identifies, and that an arbitrary reduction on roads designed and built for certain speeds is an unfair and cynical way of entrapping drivers into being forced to pay what can only be seen as a form of municipal taxation. This cash grab is spreading like a bad virus in communities throughout Ontario, as more and more councils seek to increase their revenue streams. The City of Brampton planned to acquire 100 additional ASE devices last year to add to the 50 already in use in their community. The mayor was reported as saying, “The generated revenue will be reinvested in our city’s infrastructure and community programs, making Brampton safer for our residents.” In Ottawa, a camera set up on a very busy street in 2023 generated 10,000 tickets and $650,000 in fines in just over two months. In Wellington County this year, five speed cameras have brought in $4 million in fines from 84,000 tickets in less than three months. Waterloo Region collected $1.6 million from four rotating speed cameras in 2024, with one councillor noting that under the new program, his region will be able to retain more revenue and invest it back into the community. In the city of Toronto, their automated speed enforcement program generated no less than a staggering $70 million in 2023. Regardless of the fact this new speed camera ‘pandemic’ is entirely curable, it is a disease that shows no signs of going away any time soon. Politicians at all levels are determined to move forward as they watch their monetary reserve funds completely overflow with cash. When debate ensues, elected officials and others will try to immediately stifle opposition by identifying a need to protect children in school zones, many of which are now down to a speed limit of 30 km/h. A recent study undertaken by a freelance data analyst in southwestern Ontario showed that pedestrian collisions near schools typically happen at intersections with traffic lights and at crosswalks, and that a better way to make pedestrians safer is to target collision ‘hot spots’ using physical measures such as speed humps, as well as crossing guards. On a final note, a recent media report stated that throughout the first quarter of 2025, Ottawa police were ticketed with 69 automated speed enforcement infractions and 23 red light camera infractions. These statistics were listed as ‘internal complaints’, with the Chief stating that “Depending on the circumstances, discipline may be imposed.” Meanwhile, the Region of Durham and the City of Oshawa continue to reach further and further into your pockets until, at some point, you may find yourself with nothing left to contribute.

Tax Increases and Wasteful Spending: Time for Accountability in Pickering

Tax Increases and Wasteful Spending: Time for Accountability in Pickering By Councillor Lisa Robinson As a city councillor and, more importantly, a concerned citizen, I find myself deeply troubled by the ongoing trend of excessive tax increases and wasteful spending that continues to burden the residents of Pickering. In 2025, our community faces a 3.75% municipal property tax increase, while Durham Region is imposing a staggering 5.8% hike in the regional levy. These increases are three times the current inflation rate, which hovers around 2%, placing an undue financial burden on taxpayers. But here’s the kicker: while residents are struggling with these higher taxes, our local government continues to pour taxpayer money into initiatives that lack measurable outcomes. Take, for example, the Hannover Messe 2025, an international trade fair in Germany where the Mayor and City staff traveled to represent Pickering at a significant cost to taxpayers. Thousands of dollars were spent on booths, travel, and accommodations, all in the name of “economic development.” But where are the results for Pickering residents? There’s little tangible evidence that these expensive ventures lead to real, local jobs, business growth, or direct benefits for our city. It’s frustrating to see so much public money spent with little to no return for those who are paying the bill. Unfortunately, the issue doesn’t stop there. Over the years, we have seen a troubling pattern of wasteful spending on consultants. In many cases, these consultants deliver work that is incomplete, poorly executed, or outright ineffective, only to see the city hire the same firms again, leading to costly rework and delays. This is money that could be better spent on improving our roads, supporting local businesses, or addressing the serious infrastructure needs in our community. If consultants are consistently failing to deliver quality work, then why are we paying them over and over? Why should taxpayers foot the bill for these failures? This pattern of mismanagement is compounded by a broader trend of poor project execution. We’ve seen initiatives that were started, only to be scrapped or redone because the original planning and execution were flawed. It’s not only wasteful but also demoralizing for taxpayers who are left footing the bill for government failures. As a city councillor, I believe it’s my responsibility to hold our local government accountable to the people. But, as a citizen, I share the growing frustration that many residents feel. It’s time for transparency, accountability, and responsible stewardship of taxpayer money. We cannot continue down this path of wasteful spending while residents are being asked to pay more, year after year, without seeing any tangible benefits in return. We need to refocus our priorities on what truly matters to the people of Pickering — better services, stronger infrastructure, and a more transparent and accountable local government. This needs to stop. Enough is Enough It’s time to hold our elected officials accountable for their spending, their decisions, and the impact those decisions have on all of us. If we don’t demand change, then we risk continuing this cycle of mismanagement that will ultimately harm our city in the long run. I am Councillor Lisa Robinson, “The People’s Councillor” Watch for my column each week in The Central..

We Need to Have a Good Talk About Healthcare

We Need to Have a Good Talk About Healthcare By Dale Jodoin As we head toward another election season, people are once again talking about housing, jobs, taxes—and yes, healthcare. But here’s the truth: we’re not really talking about it the way we should. We toss around slogans, blame politicians, and get into arguments online. But when it comes to actually fixing Canada’s broken healthcare system, everyone seems too scared to have a real, grown-up conversation. It’s time we sat down, took a deep breath, and had that talk. Because if we don’t? Things are only going to get worse. Canada Comes Second Last in Health Ranking A new report came out from a group called the Commonwealth Fund. They looked at 11 wealthy countries—like Germany, Australia, and the U.K.—and rated their healthcare systems. Canada came second last. That means 10 out of 11 countries are doing better than us. The only country ranked worse was the United States. Let that sink in. For a country that says we “take care of everyone,” we’re not doing a great job. People are waiting hours in emergency rooms, months to see a specialist, and even longer for surgery. Some folks are just giving up and paying out of pocket—if they can afford it. What’s Going Wrong? Let’s look at the facts. Here are some real numbers: Over 1.3 million Canadians left emergency rooms last year without being seen. Why? Because they waited too long and gave up. More than half of Canadians who needed to see a specialist had to wait over four weeks. Around 18% of people needing surgery waited more than four months. Canada has fewer doctors per person than most other developed countries. We also don’t have enough MRI or CT scanners, so even getting diagnosed takes longer. This isn’t just frustrating—it’s dangerous. Delays in care can mean worse outcomes, more stress, and even death. It’s Not the Nurses’ or Doctors’ Fault Let’s be clear: most of the people working in healthcare are doing their best. Nurses, doctors, paramedics, cleaners—many of them are burnt out, underpaid, and trying to help in a system that’s falling apart. So where’s the problem? The truth is, our healthcare system is run by too many layers of management, unions that won’t budge, and governments afraid to make changes. We have too many meetings and not enough action. Too much talk, not enough care. And no—this isn’t about “getting rid of unions.” But it is about putting adults in the room who can talk about hard truths. We need to be honest. We need to admit the system is broken and ask the tough questions: Should provinces have more freedom to try new solutions? Should private clinics be allowed for faster service, while still keeping basic care public? Should we let pharmacists and nurse practitioners do more? Should we open new training schools for nurses and doctors? Emergency Rooms Shouldn’t Be the Only Option Right now, if you get sick after 5 PM or on a weekend, your best hope is the emergency room. Why? Because walk-in clinics are closed, and many family doctors don’t offer after-hours care. That means ERs are packed with people who don’t need emergency care—they just have nowhere else to go. This slows everything down. People with real emergencies—like heart attacks or broken bones—get stuck behind people with ear infections and sore throats. We need to rethink this. More after-hours care. More mobile clinics. More home visits. Let’s take the pressure off hospitals. We Can’t Just Throw Money at It Some people say, “Just spend more!” But that’s not the answer either. Canada already spends more than most countries on healthcare. Yet we get less for it. Other countries—like Australia and the Netherlands—spend similar amounts but get better results. Their people wait less. Their systems are faster and more efficient. So maybe it’s not just about the money. Maybe it’s about how we’re spending it. We need to follow the money. How much goes to middle managers? How much paperwork? How much to consultants who never see a patient? If we’re going to fix things, we have to make sure every dollar is going where it counts—directly to patient care. Time to Get Real Here’s what I’m asking: Let’s stop pretending everything’s fine. Let’s stop blaming one political party or another. Let’s stop hiding behind slogans like “universal care” when the care isn’t really there. Let’s have that real talk—across kitchen tables, on radio shows, in town halls. Let’s talk about hard changes. Let’s talk about what’s working in other countries and what we can learn. Let’s listen to doctors and patients, not just union reps and bureaucrats. And let’s not wait for the next crisis. A System Worth Saving Despite all this, I still believe in public healthcare. I believe we should take care of each other. I believe no one should go bankrupt because they got sick. But believing in something doesn’t mean pretending it’s perfect. It means fighting to make it better. So let’s roll up our sleeves. Let’s act like grown-ups. Let’s fix this thing before it’s too late. We don’t need another election promise. We need a plan. Because our health—and the health of our country—depends on it.

PIE IN THE SKY 1.1 BILLION 50 MILLION TO PUT LIPSTICK ON A PIG… 8-9% TAX HIKE…

PIE IN THE SKY 1.1 BILLION 50 MILLION TO PUT LIPSTICK ON A PIG... 8-9% TAX HIKE... B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States Come on people. Who is doing the thinking here? Do they think we are that stupid... Wait, maybe we are as we keep electing in the same old incompetents. These so called elected incompetents are so far out of touch with reality that they waste tax dollars without much care. Early this year. Some genius proposed a 1.1billion dollar gondola project that would some how transport people from the south end all the way over to Durham College. 1.1 Billion...We are not in the Swiss Alps. We are not in a mountainous region. This just plain does not make economic sense. It is as if we have people go over the problems on the street level. There is not homeless, drugs, prostitution in our city. Insane. I personally call for the resignation of all that voted for such a wasteful expenditure. PEOPLE ARE STARVING IN OUR CITY. PEOPLE ARE LIVING ON THE STREETS. PEOPLE ARE OVER DOSING IN OUR RAVINES. Question, who of those supporting this insanity are getting a kickback.... How else can you explain it. Just recently, it was posted that there is a proposed in secret(camera) plan to further flush 50 million dollars in the GM arena. An arena that cost the City 50 million to erect. 1 million to operate. This means suckers like you have been paying for the maintenance of this facility since it was erected. Without one year of profit. Now, they want to sink in another 30 million. WHO IS DOING THE THINKING HERE. BUT WAIT, WE ARE ON THE EVE OF A MUNICIPAL ELECTION. I guess sinking your hard earned tax dollars will be deemed progress for some elected officials.... Disgusting. 50 million to put lipstick on a pig. Who is getting the kickback... you think not! Look at the line up of contractors they already have lined up. The new building additions never made it to a tender of bid process. 50 million of your hard dollars. The politicians will go harping at look at progress we are making in Oshawa. Meanwhile not telling you that the facility has been nothing but a money pit. Not, one year has generated a profit. The City is so scared of loosing the Generals... that they are pulling another GM. In fear of loosing GM. They did nothing. Subsequently we are left with an environmental mess. In the Generals case. Should we worry about them leaving? Should we care? As they have failed to support local businesses. Games are poorly advertised and it appears as a one way benefit... and not that of Oshawa taxpayers. Go Gens Go. No literally... Go Gens. We can’t afford you...

The Legacy of Pope Francis

The Legacy of Pope Francis by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East Reflecting on the peaceful Easter celebrations of millions of catholic, protestant and orthodox Christians, the sad news of the passing of Pope Francis into eternity came as a crushing blow. Here in Canada we are currently focused on the crucial federal elections soon coming to an end. Our national focus is evidenced by the more than 7.3 million Canadians who have already voted during the Easter holiday advance polls. However, we cannot ignore the death of Pope Francis. He was one of the most humane and dedicated persons to the wellbeing of humanity. Pope Francis died on Monday the 21st of April, the day after Easter, at the age of 88. As the leader of the Roman Catholic Church, he left behind a legacy of service, unity, and compassion. Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and was the son of Italian immigrants. He was named a Cardinal by Pope John Paul II in 2001 and was elected pope on March 13, 2013. Pope Francis was the first non-European pope in more than a millennium and the first Latin American pontiff. He preached peace and acceptance and reflected those values through his actions. He was the first pope to address a joint meeting of Congress in the United States and the first pope to visit the Arabian Peninsula, known as the birthplace of Islam, a historic moment for interfaith dialogue. Pope Francis (born Jorge Mario Bergoglio) 17 December 1936 – 21 April 2025) was the head of the Catholic Church and sovereign of the Vatican City State from 2013 until his death in 2025. He was the first pope from the Society of Jesus (the Jesuit Order), the first Latin American, the first from the Americas, the first from the Southern Hemisphere, and the first born or raised outside of Europe since the Syrian pope Gregory III in the 8th century. Bergoglio was inspired to join the Jesuits in 1958 after recovering from severe illness. He was ordained a Catholic priest in 1969, and from 1973 to 1979 he was the Jesuit provincial superior in Argentina. He became the archbishop of Buenos Aires in 1998 and was made a cardinal in 2001 by Pope John Paul II. Following the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI on the 28th of February 2013, a papal conclave elected Bergoglio as his successor on the 13th of March. He chose Francis as his papal name in honour of Saint Francis of Assisi. Throughout his public life, Francis was noted for his humility, emphasis on God's mercy, international visibility as pope, concern for the poor, and commitment to interreligious dialogue. On the night of his election, he took a bus back to his hotel with the cardinals rather than being driven in the papal car. The next day, he visited Cardinal Jorge María Mejía in the hospital and chatted with patients and staff. In addition to his native Spanish, he spoke fluent Italian (the official language of Vatican City and the "everyday language" of the Holy See) and German. He was also conversant in Latin (the official language of the Holy See), French, Portuguese, and English; he also understood Piedmontese and some Genoese Ligurian. He was known for having a less formal approach to the papacy than his predecessors. For instance, he chose to reside in the Domus Sanctae Marthae (House of St. Martha) guest house rather than in the papal apartments of the Apostolic Palace used by previous popes. In addition, due to both his Jesuit and Ignatian aesthetic, he was known for favoring simpler vestments devoid of ornamentation, including refusing the traditional papal mozzetta cape upon his election, choosing silver instead of gold for his piscatory ring, and keeping the same pectoral cross he had as a cardinal. Francis made women full members of dicasteries in the Roman Curia. Pope Francis was a critic of trickle-down economics, consumerism, and overdevelopment. He viewed the death penalty as inadmissible in all cases, and committed the Catholic Church to its worldwide abolition. In international diplomacy, he helped to restore full diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba, negotiated a deal with the People's Republic of China to define Communist Party influence in appointing Chinese bishops, and supported the cause of refugees. He encouraged peace between Israel and Palestinians, called protection of migrants a "duty of civilisation" and criticised anti-immigration politics world-wide. In 2022, he apologized for the Church's role in the cultural genocide of Canadian Indigenous peoples in residential schools. Pope Francis convened the Synod on Synodality, which was described as the culmination of his papacy and the most important event in the Catholic Church since the Second Vatican Council. He made his last public appearance on Easter Sunday, the day before he died. With his passing we lost a true champion of humanity. Many world leaders will pay ultimate tribute to Pope Francis, protector of the poor and disadvantaged and champion for world peace. May he rest in peace!

What Difference Will You Make to an Employer?

What Difference Will You Make to an Employer? By Nick Kossovan It’s common knowledge that companies don't hire the most qualified candidates. Employers hire the person they believe will deliver the best value in exchange for their payroll cost. Since most job seekers know the above, I'm surprised that so few mention their Employee Value Proposition (EVP). Most job seekers list their education, skills, and experience without substantiating them and expect employers to determine whether they can benefit their company; hence, most resumes and LinkedIn profiles are just a list of opinions—borderline platitudes—that are meaningless and, therefore, have no value. Job seekers need to better explain, along with providing evidence, how they'll contribute to an employer's success. Employers don't hire opinions (read: talk is cheap); they hire results. You're not offering anything tangible when you claim: · I'm a great communicator. · I'm detail oriented. · I'm a team player. Tangible: · "At Global Dynamics, I held quarterly town hall meetings with my 22 sales reps, highlighting our accomplishments, identifying opportunity areas, and recognizing outstanding performers." · "For eight years, I managed Vandelay Industries IT department, overseeing a staff of 18 and a 12-million-dollar budget while coordinating cross-specialty projects. My strong attention to detail is why I never exceeded budget." · "While working at Cyberdyne Systems, I was part of the customer service team, consisting of nine of us, striving to improve our response time. Through collaboration and sharing of best practices, we reduced our average response time from 48 to 12 business hours, resulting in a 35% improvement in customer feedback ratings." These examples of tangible answers provide employers with what they most want to hear from candidates but rarely do; what value the candidate will bring to the company. Typically, job seekers present their skills, experience, and unsubstantiated opinions and expect recruiters and employers to figure out their value, which is a lazy practice. Getting hired isn't based on "I have an MBA in Marketing and Sales," "I've been a web designer for over 15 years," "I'm young, beautiful and energetic," blah, blah, blah. Likewise, being rejected isn't based on "I'm overqualified," "I'm too old," "I don't have enough education," blah, blah, blah. Getting hired depends entirely on showing employers that you can add value and substance to their company; that you'll serve a purpose. When you articulate a solid value offer, the "blah, blah, blah" doesn't matter. Job seekers focus too much on the "blah, blah, blah," and when not hired, they say, "It's not me, it's..." The biggest mistake I see job seekers make is focusing on the "blah, blah, blah"—their experience and education—believing this is what interests employers. Hiring managers are more interested in whether you can solve the problems the position exists to solve than in your education and experience. Not impressive: Education Impressive: A track record of achieving tangible results. You aren't who you say you are; you are what you do. If you want to be somebody who works hard, you have to actually work hard. If you want to be somebody who goes to the gym, you actually have to go to the gym. If you want to be a good friend, spouse, or colleague, you have to actually be a good friend, spouse, or colleague. Actions build reputations, not words. The biggest challenge job seekers face today is differentiating themselves. To stand out and be memorable, don't be like most job seekers, someone who's all talk and no action. Any recruiter or hiring manager will tell you that the job market is heavily populated with job seekers who talk themselves up, talk a "good game" about everything they can "supposedly" do, drop names, etc., but have nothing to show for it. More than ever, employers want to hear candidates offer a value proposition summarizing what value they bring. If you're looking for a low-hanging fruit method to differentiate yourself, do what job seekers hardly ever do and make a hard-to-ignore value proposition. 1. Increase sales: "Based on my experience managing Regina and Saskatoon for PharmaKorp, I'm confident that I can increase BioGen's sales by no less than 25% in Winnipeg and the surrounding area by the end of 2025." 2. Reduce cost: "During my 12 years as Taco Town's head of purchasing, I renegotiated contracts with key suppliers, resulting in 15% cost savings, saving the company over $450,000 annually. I know I can do the same for The Pasta House." 3. Increase customer satisfaction: "During my time at Globex Corporation, I established a systematic feedback mechanism that enabled customers to share their experiences. This led to targeted improvements, increasing our Net Promoter Score by 15 points. I can increase Dunder Mifflin's net promoter score." 4. Save time: "As Zap Delivery's dispatcher, I implemented advanced routing software that analyzed traffic patterns, reducing average delivery times by 20%. My implementation of this software at Froggy's Delivery can reduce your delivery times by at least 20%, if not more." If you want to achieve job search success as soon as possible, structure your job search with a single thread that's evident and consistent throughout your résumé, LinkedIn profile, cover letters and especially during interviews; clearly convey what difference you'll make to the employer. ___________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

VOTERS HAVE MUCH TO CONSIDER IN THE 2025 ELECTION CASTING A PROTEST VOTE IS A WASTE OF TIME

VOTERS HAVE MUCH TO CONSIDER IN THE 2025 ELECTION **CASTING A PROTEST VOTE IS A WASTE OF TIME** By Dean Hickey This week I have decided to offer my readers some insights as to the federal election that will be decided on Monday April 28th. My regular City Hall column will return next week. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF 2025 will certainly be well remembered by all those who take an interest in the political matters of our country. In most neighbourhoods throughout Durham Region, residents have witnessed the coming and going of volunteers at their doorstep – some offering up a series of political talking points, and others more inclined to speak from the heart. All of which, upon the whole, may well be considered as relevant to the future of the country and of individual communities such as Oshawa. Given the chance, I would offer up a story to every eligible voter, one that I would find necessary in the telling. They would be made to understand the realities associated with casting, what I may reasonably describe as, a ‘protest vote’. Many large urban centres are known to be free-thinkers and to often rail against the established order of things, however, the result is an entire community literally removing itself from the corridors of power. Parliamentary representation, whether it be at the federal or provincial level, means more than an elected representative’s constituency staff answering inquiries on matters that involve various forms of financial assistance and other social programs. It should be the strongest object of everyone in the community to have a place at the table where real decisions are made on matters of national and international importance. A lone voice shouting objections on purely ideological grounds may offer some satisfaction to disgruntled voters, but it keeps, at a distance, that part of the political body which renders us safe and ultimately prosperous. As a result, voters may find themselves somewhat marginalized. To take the matter even further, it becomes unusually bizarre when constituencies such as Ontario’s Kitchener Centre and British Columbia’s Saanich-Gulf Islands see themselves best represented by a political party that exists in name only. I am, or course, referring to the Green Party which currently holds two seats in a country comprised of 343 federal districts. The number one question in all of this may be seen to focus entirely on what is truly best for the community in an age of tariff threats, global volatility in matters of war, economic uncertainty at home, and the need to participate in a truly meaningful way. Oshawa residents will choose their next MP from a list of only four candidates, three of whom represent Canada’s main political parties, being the Conservatives, Liberals, and New Democrats. Also on the ballot will be a candidate from the Green Party, which as I have indicated, exists in name only. Any Canadian who believes greater things might be obtained by casting a vote for one of the smaller parties in this election will overlook the stinging reality that comes from a conscious decision to stay out of high-level decision making. They will fail to see the extent to which strength through association and success by way of intelligent decisions are the basis for maintaining the security and prosperity of our community. We must be careful when considering our position among Canada’s Parliamentary decision makers. THE IMMINENT COLLAPSE OF THE NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY appears to be in full swing. Nationally, the NDP are in a very challenging place. Some polls have them in single digits in voter approval, with much of their support bleeding to the Liberals under their new leader. One polling expert has said their leader, Jagmeet Singh, might well lose his own seat in the BC riding of Burnaby South. The populist, left of centre message of the New Democratic Party no longer appears to impress most Canadians. Many can recall the glory days that began in 1961 under then-leader Tommy Douglas who brought in publicly funded health care, which remains a defining moment in this nation’s history. Where there was once a forceful alliance with organized labour, there now remains only a fraction of the power and influence that used to exist, as most low wage workers tend not to have a union representing them. In fact, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 773, have endorsed Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre. Jagmeet Singh’s inseparable connection with the Trudeau Liberals remains, as he takes credit for expanded dental care, a pharmacare plan, and a $10-a-day child care program. However, his party was seen to evolve, gradually, into what may now be considered as nothing more than a progressive version of the Liberal party. The NDP has lost its core identity, and in the process, its relevance in this election. THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE HELD ON APRIL 17TH was certainly an eye-opener for anyone who is even remotely in support of the Liberal leader, Mark Carney. He was truly awful, and I say that in a non-partisan way. He fumbled, paused, sounded insecure, kept his head bowed down a great deal, and was literally crushed by his opponents on practically every issue during the debate. The Conservative’s Pierre Poilievre was clearly focused and on message as he sought to portray Carney as an extension of the last nine years of Liberal rule, accusing him of “regurgitating” lines from Trudeau’s staffers who were in the studio. Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet was true to form, offering Carney a reality check as he destroyed many of the Liberal leader’s proposals, including an east-west energy grid that would conflict with Quebec’s already established energy programs. In my view, Canadians have an opportunity, and indeed a duty, to help bring this country out of what can only be described as a decade of darkness. The damage caused by 10 years of reckless and misguided Liberal Party rule is widespread, and the rebuilding must start now. Our very survival as a nation depends on it.

Inside Pickering’s City Hall Where Truth Is Silenced and Corruption Is Protected

Inside Pickering’s City Hall Where Truth Is Silenced and Corruption Is Protected By Councillor Lisa Robinson Democracy doesn’t die overnight. It dies slowly — through silence, coverups, and backroom politics. And in Pickering, it’s dying behind closed doors. Over the past year, I’ve brought forward numerous motions reflecting the concerns of everyday residents — motions about safety, fairness, fiscal responsibility, and respect for Canadian values. And nearly every single time, they were blocked, ignored, or buried. Not because the motions were wrong — but because they were inconvenient. This council doesn’t want uncomfortable questions. They want control. And they’re willing to rewrite the rules to keep it. Let me be clear: what’s happening inside Pickering’s City Hall is not democratic — it’s draconian. We’ve seen the bylaw amendments. The procedural games. The scripted meetings. The selective enforcement of rules designed to silence residents and dissenting councillors. Public comments are cut off. Delegations are shut down. Meetings are moved online without public input. And when people do speak up, they’re branded as “alt right”,“dangerous.” or they are character assassinated. This council — led by Mayor Kevin Ashe and backed by insiders like Brenner, Cook, Nagy, Pickles, and Butt — has used every tool at their disposal to suppress public voices and punish those who don’t fall in line. Meanwhile, city employees who mislead council or the public are protected, not reprimanded. Whistleblowers are ignored. Those who speak inconvenient truths are targeted. I’ve brought forward motions to: (Only to name a few) · Play the national anthem before council meetings · End corporate gifts and perks to councillors · Restrict sexually explicit performances from allowing minors · Ensure flags flown on public buildings represent all Canadians equally · Increase safety options in public changerooms · Pause development deals that lacked transparency · Require cameras to stay on during virtual meetings · Improve public consultation boundaries · Repeal the “climate emergency” declaration · Establish a department of government efficiency · Restore respect for Canadian tradition and neutral governance How many were refused a seconder? Too many to count. But Mayor Ashe himself has said it outright — it’s not the message, it’s “the messenger.” He stated he doesn’t want to hear from me. He’s biased, and he’s admitted it. And it shows — in the attacks, the games, and the complaints. Let’s talk about those complaints. Every single Integrity Commissioner complaint that’s gone forward against me has come from: · The Mayor · Members of Council · The Corporation of the City of Pickering · The CAO · Or even Mayor Ashe’s own family The only exception? A Facebook post — where three drinking buddies filed a complaint based on lies. What the public doesn’t know (yet) is that a sitting councillor was involved behind the scenes — encouraging it, fueling it, and waiting for the fallout. That’s not integrity. That’s political warfare. They know they can’t beat me with facts — so they hide behind procedure and weaponize process. They fear the truth I speak, because it shines a light on what they’ve built: a city hall run by insiders, for insiders. I’ve lost nine months of pay standing up for you. But I haven’t lost my voice — and I haven’t lost my resolve. I am Councillor Lisa Robinson — your People’s Councillor. I will keep standing, even when I’m standing alone. Because when they silence me, they’re trying to silence you. And I won’t let that happen. Not now. Not ever.

Municipal Failure Supreme Last One Out, Turn Off The Lights

Municipal Failure Supreme Last One Out, Turn Off The Lights By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States On April 16, 1971, real-estate agents Bob McDonald and Jim Youngren put the words, "Will the last person leaving SEATTLE -- Turn out the lights" on a billboard at S 167th Street and Pacific Highway S near Sea-Tac International Airport. The two realtors, who work for Henry Broderick, Inc., put up the billboard as a humorous response to pessimism generated by the national aerospace industry's nosedive, known locally as the Boeing Bust. A Sign of the Times The recession came as The Boeing Company, the region's largest employer, went from a peak of 100,800 employees in 1967 to a low of 38,690 in April 1971. McDonald said their out-of-town clients "were amazed that Seattle wasn’t a ghost town with weeds growing in the streets. Sadly the comparison to Oshawa. We also have weed growing on our streets in the form of cannabis shops.... Everything else is closing or has closed. Have you been downtown Oshawa lately? Well, take a drive and see the similarities to the above... God forbid take a walk. Oshawa was once the jewel on the regions crown. We had power. We had standards. We had an exceptional quailty of life. Ever since Nancy Diamond, took out the fountain at Memorial Park. Life has slowly deteriorated to a notch above a war zone. I have been warning the City of GM move to pull out. No one listened. Scared, city officials failed to stop GM from slowly taking jobs other places and leaving us with an enviromental mess. Much like The Boeing model above. Oshawa has turned in to a zombie wonderland. Made up the homeless, drug addicts, drug dealers and some of the worlds uglies prostitutes. I blame the Mayor for doing nothing but waste your tax dollars to the tune of 2 million dollars on a private para-military security company that gets him a personal bodyguard. Your Money. He likes to fill his mouth that Oshawa is resilent... The only resilient thing about him is his neglect for Oshwa and to work with people. The two downtown councillors. Complete disgrace. In the two terms they served 10yrs. Oshawa downtown has become a war zone. Yet, they push for a new downtown mini park. In my opinion. Rick Kerr and Derek Giberson should do the honorable thing and resign. Convenience stores are closing, restaurants... It appears that the only shops opening are vaping shops and cannabis. The mayor talks about supporting local small businesees. He does not. But in their defense. Kerr, has no real business experience. Giberson a third rate wonna be musician never really had a solid job other than that of being elected. We can’t expect more. But we can expect for them to resign... before the last one of us has to turn off the lights on Oshawa, due to municipal incompetence.

Electronic Communication Gadgets and Smartphones -- Posing Danger for the New Generation

Electronic Communication Gadgets and Smartphones -- Posing Danger for the New Generation by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The central news in the country currently surrounds the imminent election, a crucial election, because it will define the future of Canada. With all this election action swirling around us, it is still important to note how the explosion of devices dedicated to mass communications are influencing the way in which the next generation will be raised and influenced to behave. The introduction of electronic communication devices, especially smartphones, and with it, ubiquitous social media usage, are clearly key factors in the rise in youth mental health issues seen across the world. There is considerable evidence linking social media use to youth mental health issues. In response, Canada and other countries have developed some policies to deal with social media use among young people, but there are more practical options that Canadian policy-makers could take. Youth mental health issues have been on the rise since the early 2010s, especially among girls, with significant increases in depression, anxiety, and self-harm. In Canada, rates of depressive and anxiety disorders have climbed notably among those aged 15 to 24. This widespread pattern is not limited to Canada, but is apparent across the Anglosphere, which indicates that there is likely some global factor driving the decline in youth mental health. These negative trends are driven in particular, by social media use. There is a lack of personal contact among youth in this age group, who rely more and more on illusory cyberspace meetings, presenting a false reality. These days, time spent on social media often replaces in-person interaction, exposes users to damaging content, and leads some to interpret normal distress as symptoms of mental health. Recent studies suggest that one to two hours of daily social media use is associated with good mental health, but mental health deteriorates as use increases beyond that. The preponderance of the evidence indicates that social media is a major contributor to, and likely a leading cause of, declining mental health among young people. Governments worldwide have started to regulate children’s social media usage, often by tackling “online harm” with policies that try to moderate the content posted on these platforms. However, these efforts, such as Canada’s proposed Online Harms Act, which would impose strict punishments for “hate” offences and empower judges to restrict the movement of anyone who could commit an online hate crime in the future, often infringe on privacy and free expression. Legislation itself will not be able to limit the damages if not accompanied by a healthy system of education, incumbent upon the various board of educations, teachers themselves, and society as a whole. Given the implication of legislating, against the freedom of speech and undue censorship, Canada should find a way to effectively deal with the problem without infringing on these inalienable rights in a free and democratic system. Specifically, Canada should do this through strengthening the educational system in which our youth are spending extended periods of time. It would be advisable to strengthen bans on cellphone and social media use in schools, raise awareness of the downsides of social media, and reorient childhood around free play instead of focusing on screen time. Like any complex social phenomenon, there are likely multiple significant causal factors at play. However, the introduction of smartphones, and with it, ubiquitous social media usage, are clearly key factors in the rise in youth mental health issues seen across the world. To safeguard the mental health of its young, Canada should act now and pursue immediate policies that mitigate social media’s harms as prudently as possible. It is also important to involve parents in this process and much more cooperation and engagement is required from the various bodies of education. It is crucial to involve parents because they have the ultimate responsibility for the future of their children. A symbiosis between the bodied of education, individual teachers and parents is essential in this process of limiting the effects of social media on the mental health of our growing young people. A common sense approach has to be established on this issue. Politicians can legislate to infinity, but life cannot be legislated, it just takes its course. Reflecting upon all this, I do hope that the upcoming election will not create an additional factor, causing adult mental health issues. Good luck and be sure to vote!

Is Canada Still the Country We Thought It Was?

Is Canada Still the Country We Thought It Was? By Dale Jodoin Over the past two decades, many Canadians have noticed something changing. The country feels less united, less fair, and more dangerous. Across schools, courtrooms, and political offices, a growing number of people are asking: Is this still the Canada we were promised? From weak school systems to unequal justice and a rising wave of climate extremism, some say Canada is heading down a troubling path. Across the country, teachers are struggling to keep control in classrooms. Over the years, school systems have shifted their focus—from discipline and structure to emotional comfort. Some students now feel free to yell, act out, or even threaten others without facing serious consequences. "Respect is gone in many classrooms," says one retired educator. "Students are told they’re always the victim, so they don’t take responsibility for bad behavior." As a result, many young people are growing up without learning how to follow rules, listen to others, or work through problems peacefully. This has led to more conflict—not only in schools, but also later in life. Canada’s legal system was built on the idea that everyone is equal under the law. But more people are beginning to feel that justice isn’t being served fairly. In some cases, the punishment depends more on who you are than what you did. Certain groups seem to get lighter sentences, while others face harsher ones. Scam artists, repeat criminals, and violent offenders are often released back into the community with little punishment. This has caused many Canadians to lose faith in the justice system. When people don’t trust the courts, they may feel they need to solve problems on their own. Canada’s political leaders once focused on building roads, creating jobs, and protecting families. Today, many seem more focused on headlines and global image. Regular people say they feel left behind—especially those in rural areas or working-class neighborhoods. While taxes rise and living costs grow, Canadians see billions spent on programs that often don’t help them. Many believe politicians care more about big business, foreign interests, or social media trends than about the average citizen. One small business owner shared: “It feels like the people in charge don’t even live in the same country we do.” Caring for the planet is a good thing. Most Canadians agree we need to reduce pollution and protect nature. But a growing number of people have turned climate action into something more dangerous. Radical groups have started vandalizing businesses, attacking pipelines, and even threatening people with different opinions. These acts aren’t peaceful protests—they’re attacks. Yet many politicians and media outlets avoid calling them out. “When you can’t question something without being silenced or punished, it becomes like a religion,” one analyst said. “And when people act on it with violence, that’s extremism.” Canada is not prepared for this new kind of domestic threat. Law enforcement often backs off. Politicians avoid speaking up. But the damage is real—jobs lost, property destroyed, and public fear on the rise. There is growing concern that young Canadians who still believe in fairness, law, and order will eventually give up on the system. They may stop voting. They may stop speaking out. Some may even feel forced to take action into their own hands when no one else will. That is when a country becomes unstable. “When good people stop believing the rules work, things fall apart fast,” said one retired police officer. “And that’s where we’re headed if we don’t fix this.” Can Canada Still Be Saved? Yes—but change needs to happen now. Schools must return to discipline, structure, and respect. Justice must be equal and fair for all—no matter your background. Leaders must listen to regular Canadians, not just activists or corporations. And Canada must be brave enough to deal with violent climate extremists the same way it handles any other threat. Canada is not just a flag or a place on a map. It’s an idea—one built on fairness, safety, and opportunity. But if we lose those values, we lose the country. There is still time to make things right. But it will take strong voices, open eyes, and a public that refuses to stay silent.

Remove the Barriers That Are Preventing You From Finding a Job

Remove the Barriers That Are Preventing You From Finding a Job By Nick Kossovan I'm partial to the words of the 13th-century Persian poet Rumi: "Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers within yourself that you have built against it." Daly, I see job seekers constructing barriers that scream, "I'm unemployable!" Whether they’re unaware of how their actions are hindering their job search or believe the world should accept them as they are, many job seekers are their own worst enemy. When faced with rejection, they claim that employers are unfair, biased, and engaging in some form of discrimination instead of considering whether their actions are a contributing factor to their challenges in finding employment. The most common self-imposed obstacles (barriers) I see: Sense of Entitlement When it comes to job searching, the number one self-created barrier is having a sense of entitlement, which turns off employers. You're not owed a job because you have what you consider are "qualifications." A humble attitude and a strong work ethic—evidenced by measurable results— make a positive impression on employers. Therefore, the first step to improving your job search odds is to embrace a humble mindset and lose any sense of entitlement you may have. Unrealistic Expectations "It's your own expectations that hurt you. Not the world you live in." - Jacque Fresco, American futurist (1916 - 2017) Many job seekers enter the job market with a laundry list of demands influenced by their sense of entitlement. They expect a six-figure salary, remote work, and a 30-hour workweek, ignoring three truisms: 1. The world doesn't owe you anything, a job, a living, happiness. All must be earned on the terms set by social norms, market forces and others (e.g., employers). 2. There's always someone younger, more skilled and hungrier than you. You're not an employer's "must-have." 3. The golden rule: Whoever has the gold makes the rules. Being realistic and accepting of what you can expect and what you're worth in today's job market—a free market—in which remote jobs are harder to find and land, your compensation ask may be too high for the value to claim you'll bring to the employer and employers aren't quick to hire will expedite your job search. Bashing Employers on Social Media It's well-known that recruiters and employers will review your digital footprint to determine if you're interview-worthy. Yet, despite knowing this, there's a trend, fueled by a sense of entitlement, of publicly bashing employers on social media platforms, especially LinkedIn. Publicly bashing employers does three things: 1. Raises a red flag. 2. Shows a lack of emotional control. 3. Labels you as someone who can't handle setbacks gracefully. A negative digital footprint only serves to isolate you from potential employers. An Incomplete LinkedIn Profile Your online presence makes or breaks your job search. A LinkedIn profile with no profile picture, a blank banner, typos, grammatical errors and lacking quantifiable achievements says, "This person isn't serious about their career." Failing to create a polished, engaging profile, knowing recruiters and employers will review and judge, raises the question: Why is the person deliberately hindering their job search and career success? Lack of Networking "Everything you want in life is a relationship away." ? Idowu Koyenikan, Wealth for All: Living a Life of Success at the Edge of Your Ability. It's common knowledge that most job openings are filled through referrals and personal connections. Knowing this reality, if you're not networking, you're choosing to miss out on the countless opportunities around you right now; however, the opportunities are linked to people; thus, the more people you get to know, the more opportunities you'll get to know. The best book for learning how to network effectively: How to Win Friends and Influence People - Dale Carnegie Lack of Flexibility Despite dwindling white-collar jobs and ongoing layoffs, some job seekers stubbornly hold out for their "perfect" job. While knowing what you want is important, being too rigid ignores the reality that the job market is free, where employers, as per the golden rule, hold the power. Given today's conditions, temper your "wants" and consider contract work or part-time positions, which can provide valuable experience, networking opportunities, and some income. Taking a step backward or sideways can be a wise career strategy. Trust me, having a job is better than not. Believing the World Owes You Acceptance The end goal of a job search is to find an employer (read: hiring manager) who accepts you. However, the world owes you nothing, including acceptance. Expecting to be liked or approved of can lead to resentment and bitterness, complicating your job search. Vulnerability is essential in this process. If you approach it with a mindset of entitlement, disappointment will follow, leading to unnecessary stress and anxiety—mental barriers you don't need. Employers seek problem solvers, not victims. Shift your focus from what you think you deserve to what you can offer. Job searching is challenging enough without adding unnecessary barriers, essentially being your own worst enemy. Removing the aforementioned barriers and taking full responsibility for your actions and perceptions will place you in a much better position to achieve job search success. ___________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

The Interview

The Interview By Theresa Grant Real Estate columnist If, at some point you decide to list your house for sale, you may choose to enlist the guidance and expertise of a realtor. If so, it is important to not only choose the right one for you but also know how to. Many people know at least one, and in some cases a person may know several real estate agents so it may just be a matter of choosing which one they will pick to represent them in their transaction. It is the people that really don’t know any realtors to speak of that need to follow another process. That is the good old fashioned interview process. Deciding on a realtor to handle your transaction is very important because it is often the biggest transaction of your life involving a great deal of money, and many moving parts – no pun intended. One of the best ways to go about this is to use the same method that you might use if you were hiring a contractor to do some work for you. Most people subscribe to the three-quote theory. They have three different people or companies come in, do an assessment and provide a quote on the work to be done. The same is advised when hiring a relator to list and sell your home. No different than a contractor, you would want to know how much experience that person has in the type of work you’re looking to have done. You would also want to see examples of work that the contractor has done previously so you can determine if that contractor would be a good fit for what you are looking to have done. You definitely want to make sure the person you are going to hire will do the work at the price you want to pay. Keeping in mind, all things are negotiable. Some people are not aware that you can negotiate a commission price with the realtor. That is one reason that you want to interview more than one realtor. It is never up to the realtor to choose the listing price of a home, that is strictly up to the home owner. That being said, a realtor is there to provide information that will help you determine the best asking price for your home. Some advice on finding a realtor would be to call three different brokerages. You can google real estate brokerages in your area. Set appointments for three agents, one from each brokerage, to come and visit you at your home. They will do some background work prior to arriving so they have a package to present to you upon arrival. Remember, you are in the driver’s seat here. You can formulate some important questions to ask each agent. Allow the agents to present their materials to you. Don’t feel awkward to come right out and ask each agent why they think you should hire them. After all this is a real job interview. They are asking you to hire them for this task, it is only fair that you should ask, why you? At the end of the process, you should have a pretty good idea of who fits the bill to you your liking, and who you feel most comfortable with. Remember, you are forging a relationship here, you want to make it a good one.

They lied to you. Repeatedly. Boldly. Without shame.

They lied to you. Repeatedly. Boldly. Without shame. By Councillor Lisa Robinson

Remember The Ice Cream Truck

remember the ice cream truck... By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States Remember simpler times.... as a kid waiting for the ice man to come riding that old insulated wagon pulled by good old Charlie. Charlie always appreciating that apple or bucket of water awaiting for him during every visit. Or the times waiting on the milk man. Bringing the order of fresh milk, butter and other goodies. There I would stand holding written order in pencil... Or the knife sharpener... the mailman... The shoe repair man... Oh those were the times. Sun gently caressing my skin.... And who can forget the ICE cream trunk later in the 60’s. That bell that could be heard blocks away. Soon as you would hear it... You run to your mom and hit her up for some cash. Soon as you seen it coming.... You run to the curb awaiting the latest flavor or at the least you favor... as many times they would run out and or sub in a different one. As I sit here looking out my office window. My memories race, to the uncertainties. To the innocence of being a child. My parents sheltering me from all of the world’s ills. Look at today. All those memories enriching my character.... Today instead of the ice cream truck. We await the political truck to roll by. At the local level, many people do not even know who is running until they pull up to your front door and introduce themselves. As voters we are at the will of the National names. Some vote on traditional misconceptions. Others on the color of the party. And yet others don’t even bother voting. Democracy is a word pretty much like love. A mix of interpretations and uses. Everyone has their own take. Depending on the context at the moment. Much like that ice cream truck. We the voters have little memory of what we had. A clear dislike for what we are having, ‘NOTHING’. And hope that this time around the truck will bring us something good and something sweet. Much like children, all we want is to be happy. To feel loved and to love those around you. Our political flavor stems from many ideas, misconceptions and presumption, assumptions that normally are not rooted. We the people can’t be expected to see the bigger picture. We only see the wrapper of the different flavors. Then it is up to us to try them. But like they say. Those that like Vanilla over Strawberry will always go for Vanilla. That sweet taste is why we live in a neapolitan world full of confusion guided by ice cream trucks driven by agenda, propaganda and general self fulfilling interests. Vote - No Vote - Hell it is all ice cream that melt after the election.

Election Fever Has Taken Over in Canada

Election Fever Has Taken Over in Canada by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East We are approaching the halfway point of a strange federal election campaign. Polls are heating up, the journalists and the pundits are getting more and more exited, predictions of the winner are abounding, but the economic situation is getting worse for the ordinary Canadian. The tariff war is being fueled by our neighbor to the South and the geopolitical situation is deteriorating by the day. The unpredictable nature of this tariff war is seriously worrisome and President Trump is playing a dangerously provocative game. Dare we call it bull-negotiations? In a situation like this, one hopes that the world might one day be a better place to live. On our political front, the time has come for parties to release their platforms, and we are being bombarded by promises from all sides. As usual, the politicians are promising everything to get the vote. Once the election is over, many of these promises will be forgotten. So diving into this midterm campaign, we see that the competing parties are not only campaigning, but they are constantly asking for money. The advertising is heating up, with negative advertising becoming the trending signature of the Conservative Party. Rallies with the leaders are being held regularly all over the country, with each party trying to convince the electorate to vote for them. However, the economic outlook in Canada is not so good for the near future. Canadian economic growth is expected to run below trend in 2025 and 2026, before finding greater balance in 2027. Slowing population growth and the impact of tariffs on business and consumer sentiment are the drivers of lower growth. Consumer spending had been improving with lower interest rates, but we expect this to act as a drag on growth as higher prices cut into spending power. This has the unemployment rate moving above its long-run level until 2027. Businesses and households see the economic climate as unpredictable. The scope and magnitude of planned US tariffs, along with the timing of their implementation, continue to change. This uncertainty is making it difficult for businesses to make investment and hiring decisions and to set prices. Trade tensions have led households to worry more about their job security and financial health, and they now intend to spend less. Concern about job security is particularly evident among people working in sectors that are highly dependent on trade. Businesses have revised down their sales outlooks. Indicators of future sales—such as order books and sales enquiries—have declined. This decline is particularly prominent in manufacturing. In addition, sectors that depend on households’ discretionary spending continue to report weak demand. Most businesses say they are continuing with existing investment projects, particularly projects aimed at maintaining capacity and improving productivity. In the oil and gas sector, many businesses expect only a modest impact on their near-term investment and production decisions. However, a tariff would make projects less attractive to investors over the medium term. Certainly, households and businesses expect trade tensions to lead to higher prices. This is reflected in a recent rise in their short-term inflation expectations. This is the tense situation in which the federal election campaign is being conducted. Undoubtedly, we can expect to see more interesting days, with more surprises to come. One interesting development has been the involvement of former Prime Minister Stephen Harper in the Conservative Party campaign. He was not very committed in previous campaigns, but this time he came out forcefully in favor of the leader of the Conservative Party, Pierre Poilievre. Let us hope that once the election campaign is over, Canadians will have a more predictable and a strong government to deal with the very serious issues we face both at home and abroad. Hope for the best and let your voice be heard. Get out and VOTE.

Tariffs and War A look through the Looking Glass

Tariffs and War A look through the Looking Glass By Maurice Brenner Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering For those who have watched Back to the Future, you might be starting to wonder if Donald Trump used a TESLA TIME MACHINE to travel forward from 1812 to 2025. Here we are in the first week of April 2025, and it is as if we are once again playing out the same War but this time using Tariffs as the weapon of choice. While I do not support what the Trump administration has imposed around the world and in particular here in Canada nor will I ever understand how anyone would chose a mission that has isolated the USA from the world and just like in 1812 has brought us together as a diverse group Canadians, strengthening our pride and love of Country while at the same time building relationships with our allies. It has forced us to not only celebrate Canada but to gain greater independence from our cousins the USA. Canada has earned the right to be respected, the Trump Administration obviously as their forefathers did in 1812 under estimated who we are and how united we are. To understand this one only has to revisit our history, the War of 1812, a conflict that shaped who we are. The war lasted from 1812 to 1814, the United States just like Trump had a desire to expand its territory viewing Canada as weak, launching several invasions. But like today the USA underestimated Canada. In 1812 the British along with First Nations Warriors defended our boundaries against the the US forces. Similarly, today, it has fostered a sense of Canadian identity and pride, bringing together Canadians of all diverse backgrounds, who chose Canada as their homeland. The War of1812 until the Trump era had an everlasting impact on our relationship with the USA and for Centuries and Decades to follow was based on a foundation of mutual respect, peace and co-operation. So what has changed? While Canada prospered and continued on its own journey, the USA became stagnant and rather than looking from with-in, as in 1812 blamed its allies targeting Canada to the North. Rather than guns and bullets, the USA today are using Tariffs, placing high taxes on goods failing to recognize how it will harm their own Country. Obviously they never learn. Had they used their TESLA TIME MACHINE and travelled back to 1773 to “The Boston Tea Party”, they could have avoided what the consequences of their actions will be today in 2025. They in the USA will face unrest and who knows maybe another Civil War from with-in (But that is a story for another day) But now lets travel forward to 2027, the Tariff/Trade War has ended, and once again Canada and our World allies remained strong and united, while unfortunately the good people of the USA will end up paying the price as a result of a needless War, the Trump Team launched on the World and lost. YES HISTORY REPEATS ITS SELF.

Is a renter always a tenant?

Is a renter always a tenant? By Theresa Grant Real estate columnist Renting in the province of Ontario doesn’t always mean you’re considered a tenant. As such, not everyone is protected under the RTA, The residential Tenancies Act. Whether or not you are covered under the Residential Tenancies Act depends on the type of accommodation you are renting. If you are renting an apartment in a large building with multiple units for instance, you would be considered a tenant. As such, you would be covered under the Residential Tenancies act. If you are renting a room in a house where your landlord or the owner of the house also lives, you would be considered a boarder or a lodger. If you are renting a self-contained basement apartment with a separate entrance, and the owner of the house, the landlord or landlady lives upstairs, you would be considered a tenant. It can get confusing. Renting rooms in a house where the owner or landlord does not reside, is different yet again. If that is the case, you would be considered a tenant. Rooming houses were a way of life many years ago especially in populated cities like Toronto. That may have been a person’s first home away from home as they migrated to the city for work or school. Over the years, their popularity dwindled and, in some cases, became neglected run-down fire traps. There are very strict fire regulations on the registered rooming houses that remain. There are a few registered rooming houses here in Oshawa. They are inspected by the fire department on a regular basis. The official inspection pass is usually located just inside the front door along with the occupancy maximum. They are run like a business because that is what they are considered. As rents surged over the last few years, rooming houses seem to have regained some popularity. If you are living in a four-bedroom house and the owner and or the owner’s family also reside in the house, you are a boarder or a lodger. You are not covered under the Residential Tenancies Act. One helpful notation to all of this confusion seems to be that if you are renting a space within the home of the landlord or landlady, and you do not have a kitchen or bath, you are then considered a lodger as opposed to a tenant. It is always recommended to know your rights and responsibilities when it comes to renting and always know whether you are considered a tenant or a boarder.

A TALE OF TWO MAYORS AND A D.E.I CULTURE GONE MAD THE ISSUES AND DEBATES THAT HAVE SHAPED THE WEEK

A TALE OF TWO MAYORS AND A D.E.I CULTURE GONE MAD THE ISSUES AND DEBATES THAT HAVE SHAPED THE WEEK By Dean Hickey THIS WEEK WE DIRECT OUR ATTENTION toward events which, by themselves, have displayed a range of unhealthy moral and philosophical principles, all of which account for much of what is lacking in the way we are governed. It is impossible at times, notwithstanding the most strenuous exertions, to raise the acuity of some among the elected officials who now occupy certain city council chambers. Readers of this column may surely grasp this reality as we consider recent social media posts that are generating plenty of controversy. PICKERING’S MAYOR ASHE TAKES TO SOCIAL MEDIA To even the most casual observer, the tensions that have plagued Pickering City Council so far this term are nothing less than troubling to residents within the community as well as some among the municipality’s staff. The source of this conflict continues to be a matter for debate, however, over the course of six days last month, Mayor Kevin Ashe took to Facebook in an attempt to offer up a series of provocative comments aimed at his well-known adversary, Ward 1 City councillor Lisa Robinson. The unfortunate narrative began with a post on March 22 in which the Mayor described councillor Robinson as a ‘hypocrite” suggesting she was “The only Councillor who has been found to breach our gifts policy…” This, as one might expect, gave rise to a public debate between the Mayor and his outspoken colleague. Their exchanges included the following remarks as each sought to outdo the other in what could only be described as an online sparring match: Ashe: “You can’t follow the rules. Why don’t you start there?” Robinson: “”Why don’t you start following the current rules?” Ashe: “I follow the rules…” Robinson: “Stop deflecting, Mr. Mayor. Why won’t you second the motion to ban gifts and benefits?” If that public display of animosity and schoolyard banter wasn’t enough, Mayor Ashe posted yet again on March 26, suggesting councillor Robinson take a leave of absence due to her having recently been selected as a federal candidate in a neighbouring riding. That post appears to have been removed, however, another was added in its place a mere 24 hours later. This time, the debate has been considerable, with one participant suggesting to the Mayor, “It’s actually embarrassing watching you whine about her” and another saying, “This bickering back and forth between Ashe and Robinson is unprofessional.” Perhaps the most memorable comment was offered by councillor Robinson herself when she told the Mayor, “Looks like I’ve taken up permanent residence in your thoughts…” The situation continues to unfold for all the world to see, and whether one agrees with Mayor Ashe or his opponent in the debate, this little exhibition of ‘catch me if you can’ does nothing but diminish the Office of the Mayor, and that is something everyone over at Pickering city hall needs to understand. OSHAWA’S MAYOR CARTER BUILDS A BUREAUCRATIC EMPIRE “At this particular time, I have embraced the Strong Mayor Powers, and I just want to remind everyone of that.” Those comments were made by Oshawa Mayor Dan Carter as some councillors attempted to debate a few key components of his tax-and-spend agenda. It began during a debate over public engagement opportunities for future budget deliberations, namely that a special meeting of council be held on a pre-scheduled weeknight this coming autumn to listen to residents’ concerns. Ward 5 Regional councillor Brian Nicholson was unequivocal in his comments to the Mayor as to how such a meeting may be perceived. “It leaves the impression that Council has some kind of authority or power in this process.” He went on to add, “When we say to the public that Council is going to listen and… control the budget process, we are misleading the public.” It is known that councillors attempted to bring forward amendments to last year’s budget, only to be vetoed by Mayor Carter as part of his overwhelming embrace of the supreme powers bestowed upon him by the Provincial government. Local taxpayers were subsequently faced with an increase in spending and staffing levels, to be paid for by a whopping 7.87% tax increase, far above that of the previous year, which amounted to less than 4%. The proposal for greater public input on the budgetary process was ultimately voted down, not only by the Mayor, but also councillors Bob Chapman, John Gray, John Neal, and Rick Kerr. Undeterred, councillor Nicholson went on to move a motion that “Council recommends a budget increase target of not more than 4% in 2026.” This proposal was ultimately successful, but without the support of the Mayor and certain councillors apparently unwilling to rule out another major tax increase, including Derek Giberson, Jim Lee, and Rick Kerr. OSHAWA DEI CHAMPIONS AWARDS PROGRAM Last week I told readers of this column about efforts within some municipalities, particularly the City of Toronto, to create an unelected council seat for a representative of the Indigenous community, part of a broad-reaching mandate by that city’s in-house Diversity Equity and Inclusion (D.E.I.) bureaucracy. Last week, Oshawa councillors approved an initiative by their own staff to establish a ‘Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Champions Awards Program’ with an inaugural awards presentation scheduled for Spring 2026. For those who believe solely in the inherent fairness associated with a merit-based approach towards hiring and other selection processes, the staff report considered by Council is nothing more than an affirmative action and racial preferences mandate. The intent of the report is to see a government-initiated extension of D.E.I. initiatives toward individuals, schools, businesses, charities, and non-profit organizations, all under the guise of a so-called rewards program. The ideology behind this type of approach has rightly become a target of criticism, as the focus is inevitably on ‘identity’ over merit, leading to quotas and forced representation rather than on skills and qualifications. Certain among the anti-racism policies and other such programs which seek to foster a welcoming environment, fairness in the application of our laws, and the protection of individual rights are all positive steps. The mandate associated with overall D.E.I. ideology, however, may be seen as less valuable, and certainly less trustworthy. A COLLECTIVE DISPLAY OF RECKLESS IDEAS The unfortunate aspects of our political culture highlighted in this week’s column display, in a special manner, the truth of what this newspaper has heretofore identified as weaknesses within the democratic process. We see it as a waste of votes when citizens elect officials who start making decisions based on self-interest rather than those of the community which put them into office in the first place. Embarrassing debates on social media, a reckless disregard for over-burdened taxpayers, and the approval of policies that will only seek to divide rather than unify, are all part of a pattern bordering on ineptitude. Meanwhile, the threat of significant global economic challenges looms overhead, and will require a renewed focus among municipal councils on what really matters, being the economy and the creation of jobs. Let us hope common sense prevails.