How Cybersecurity And Technology Jobs Can Equal Success For An Autistic Individual

How Cybersecurity And Technology Jobs Can Equal Success For An Autistic Individual by Kadin McElwain: My father always told me that the technology field is a great career field for autistic individuals to get employment. Of course, I settled with something in the communications field, as I would be doing something I’m passionate about. But recently, it’s come to my attention that technology would be perfect for me, an autistic individual, to find work. So in a society that’s driven by technology, where do autistic individuals come into play? How can an autistic individual’s skills make the technology field a perfect industry to work in? Here are three examples of cybersecurity and technology equaling success for an autistic individual. Example One: Not Needing To Socialize As Much: One of the biggest problems for autistic individuals in our society is the lack of social skills that they may have. All individuals, especially those on the spectrum, want friends and companionship. In fact, it’s human nature to want companionship. The problem for autistic individuals is that they may be overwhelmed in social situations and may have a fear of rejection. Therefore, it may be hard for them to be able to make friends, which can impact them on an interprofessional level as well. This can result in a low quality of life as well, in all forms. This is where a career in technology or cybersecurity comes in. There are a few technology jobs where you have to go into the office to do your work. But you don’t necessarily have to interact with anybody face to face while you do the work unless it’s during an employee break or a major meeting with your boss about a potential promotion. If the technology job is remote, that’s even better for autistic individuals. Not only do they not have to go into the office to do their work, but they’ll also have the ability to do the job in the comfort of their own home. This can ensure that the job is both enjoyable and comfortable for the individual. Example Two: Routines, Routines, Routines: If there is one thing that is sacred to an autistic individual, it’s having a proper routine and sticking with it. Whether it’s having the same things in your morning coffee every day, immediately rushing to do your morning chores after said coffee, or listening to the same song every day, having that routine is just as important to an autistic individual as breathing. With a majority of jobs, things can change expeditiously and the routine could be thrown off multiple times. Powerpoint presentations may need to be given on the third Tuesday of every other month, business taxes may need to be filed on Tuesday, yet are due on Wednesday night, and there could even be a major PR crisis that needs to be dealt with before anything else! As a result of the constant change in routine, the autistic individual could feel overwhelmed. But with a job in the technology field, your routine is mostly the same. You clock in for the day, go to your cubicle to do your work, have lunch, and go home. There may be one or two days out of the month when you do something outside of the routine, such as an employee team-building exercise or a company picnic. But these aren’t stressful routine-altering events but rather enjoyable events that have little to no effect on your work routine. When you have a career in technology, your routine will be the same and you will never have a severe routine-altering event that stresses you out. This makes the field a successful one for autistic individuals to break into and thrive. Example Three: A Platform To Use Your Heightened Sense Of Concentration: Autistic individuals have a heightened sense of concentration when it comes to certain tasks and topics that they enjoy. Sometimes, people with autism can spend hours researching a topic they enjoy and spend all night on projects they’re working on for school or work because they are dedicated to the tasks or topics at hand. A huge issue with most industries is that there is no room to concentrate on only one task or topic. Especially in today’s society, you have to know 72 different trades or more to even be considered for an interview. Some of these trades, such as knowing four different languages, knowing how to use seven different platforms, and knowing how to fix a copy machine, can take months, if not years, to fully master. This can disqualify autistic individuals from jobs at best and cause stress while on the job at worst. With a job in the technology field, you can use your heightened sense of concentration as an autistic individual to focus on completing one task, as opposed to multiple tasks at the same time. The task at hand is simply to make sure all things on the technological side of the business are running as smoothly as possible and to make sure any threats to company security are eliminated. There’s no need to learn over 100 different tasks to get the job or to learn new tasks while on the job that could take months to learn and stress you out. You get to use your heightened sense of concentration exclusively on making sure the network of a company runs smoothly. This can result in an enjoyable experience and success in your career. To conclude, cybersecurity and the tech field can be great industries for autistic individuals to establish a career for themselves. They don’t have to socialize as much as they have to in other fields, they can have a stable routine, and they can use their heightened sense of concentration to complete the task at hand and make the experience as enjoyable as possible. That’s not to say that autistic individuals aren’t capable of having success in other fields. All individuals are capable of whatever they set their minds to, no matter what they’re going through. However, a career in the technology field can help guarantee the success of an autistic individual in their career.

Durham MP calls for protection of Christians in Canada

Durham MP calls for protection of Christians in Canada By Sami Parvez In May 2024, Jamal Jivani, 37, was elected as the member of Parliament for Durham in a by-election, replacing former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole, who stepped down in August 2023. Jivani has been a vocal for protecting Christians and their rights in Canada. In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Durham MP Jamal Jivani called on Canadians to sign a petition addressing what he described as government inaction in the face of increasing threats to Christian communities. In Canada, Christians are facing backlash while the government turns a blind eye. This comes despite more than 19.3 million Canadians identifying as Christian—53 per cent of the population, according to the 2021 census. "I'm sounding the alarm,” Jivani said in the video posted on X. “We need to do more to protect Christians in Canada,” The MP’s call comes amidst growing concerns over vandalism and arson targeting churches, as well as debates surrounding religious freedoms and parental rights and growing influence of the LGBTQ2S+ movement. Jivani criticized the federal government in a video posted on X, for its perceived failure to address these issues, questioning its commitment to safeguarding Christian heritage. He also raised alarm over what he described as a “crime spree” targeting places of worship, emphasizing the need to protect the freedom of expression for Christian churches. Durham MP expressed concerns in his video about the federal government's failure to defend parental rights and Christian values. He emphasized the need to protect mothers and fathers, conscience rights for workers, and to address crimes targeting churches, such as arson and vandalism. It is uncommon for a Muslim MP to advocate for the protection of Christianity, as Muslims rarely speak out on behalf of other religious groups, particularly Christians. Some Islamic scholars argue that saying "Merry Christmas" implies endorsing the belief that "God has a son," which conflicts with Islamic teachings. For this reason, they consider it prohibited, as it is seen as celebrating the son of God. Christianity has been under threat in Canada since Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took office, with the Christmas season increasingly referred to as the holiday season. In 2021, the discovery of unmarked graves at former residential school sites sparked national outrage, leading to more than 100 churches being burned or vandalized. At the time, Trudeau told media, “I understand the anger that’s out there against the federal government, against institutions like the Catholic Church. It is real and it’s fully understandable, given the shameful history that we are all becoming more and more aware of and engaging ourselves to do better as Canadians.” In 2009, Durham Region experienced a troubling rise in church vandalism and arson, affecting historic and cherished landmarks. All Saints’ Anglican Church in Whitby, a 144-year-old structure, faced repeated vandalism before being destroyed by a suspicious fire, with damages estimated at $2-3 million. Investigators found a gas canister at the scene. Similarly, St. Philip the Apostle Catholic Church in Oshawa was ravaged by a Christmas Day fire with multiple points of origin, suspected to be motivated by religious bigotry. These attacks left congregations grappling with emotional pain, financial strain, and displacement, highlighting the urgent need for community vigilance. “Now when you see a Christmas tree like this in Parliament you might think that's a sign of respect for Christians,” Durham MP said in the video. “But what good is a Christmas tree here in Parliament when you have a federal government that will not lift a finger to protect Christians from governments and corporations abusing their power?” According to the International Prayer Connect (IPC), a global network of over 4,500 Christian prayer and mission networks and organizations, in 2019, Trudeau told Pastor Steve Long, a Canadian Baptist minister, 'Evangelical Christians were the worst part of Canadian society.” The remark continues to fuel distrust among Evangelical groups toward Trudeau's government." “We have to stop the crime spree targeting churches including arson and vandalism,” Conservative MP added in the video. “And we need to defend the legal status of Christian Charities and the freedom of expression of Christian churches.” “This is not about forcing other people to live according to Christian values no this is about whether Christians in Canada have the freedom to live according to their own traditions and to practice their own faith without corporations and governments engaging in overreach.” Durham MP is urging Canadians to take action by signing a petition on one of his sites. The petition, aimed at protecting Christian rights and heritage, will be presented at an event in Ottawa in February 2025. “This is not about forcing others to live according to Christian values,” Jivani said in the video. “This is about whether Christians in Canada have the freedom to live according to their own traditions and practice their faith without corporations and governments overreaching.” Jivani emphasized the need to stop crimes targeting churches and defend the legal status of Christian charities, urging Canadians to stand united in protecting their rights and freedoms.

Why Pickering Needs to Rethink Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs: A Call for Common Sense

Why Pickering Needs to Rethink Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs: A Call for Common Sense By Lisa Robinson At the May 6th, 2024 Executive Meeting, I stood alone in voting against forcing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs and policies on the City of Pickering. At the time, I cautioned my fellow council members and city staff that DEI was facing bans in some U.S. states due to its divisive nature and inefficiency. Now, just months later, my concerns have proven valid. DEI programs have spiraled into a bureaucratic nightmare—wasting taxpayer dollars, sowing division, and replacing practical governance with ideological agendas. While I stood firm in opposing these policies, all three of my colleagues present at that meeting were actively pushing to accelerate the implementation of the DEI program. Meanwhile, some of the world’s largest and most successful companies like McDonald’s, Walmart, Boeing, Molson-Coors, Ford, Jack Daniel’s, John Deere, Lowe’s, Harley-Davidson, Meta, and Amazon, are abandoning DEI initiatives. Why? Because these programs don’t work. They create division, invite lawsuits, alienate customers, and fuel tensions among employees. If industry giants with global operations recognize the harm caused by DEI, why is Pickering still embracing it? The slogan “go woke, go broke” has become more than a catchy phrase—it’s a reality. Time and again, businesses and organizations that prioritize ideological agendas over quality, fairness, and merit end up facing backlash from consumers and stakeholders. Just look at the numerous companies that have lost market share, tarnished their reputations, or faced significant public criticism for going too far with divisive DEI initiatives. DEI is not the cure-all it was once marketed as; instead, it is a framework that too often prioritizes optics over outcomes and division over unity. In Pickering, we’re already seeing the cracks. DEI policies don’t just fail to address the root causes of inequality—they create new problems. By categorizing people based on their identity rather than their character or qualifications, these programs foster resentment and suspicion. No one should be hired based on the color of their skin, their religious beliefs, or their sexual preferences. When you board a plane or go into surgery, do you want to be wondering if the pilot or surgeon was hired because of DEI quotas, or because they were the best person for the job? Competence and merit should always come first. These policies also breed inefficiency. The introduction of costly DEI officers, training sessions, and consultants eats away at our city budget, diverting funds that could be spent on tangible improvements for our residents. Do we want a city that prioritizes ideological box-checking over fixing our roads, supporting small businesses, and investing in public safety? Residents are already stretched thin by rising costs of living. They deserve to see their hard-earned tax dollars go toward initiatives that make Pickering a better, safer, and more prosperous place—not divisive policies that sow confusion and mistrust. Let’s be clear not to twist my words. I’m not advocating for the exclusion of anyone. What I’m saying is that we should be focusing on unity and inclusion through fairness and common sense—not through bureaucratic, expensive programs that polarize our community. A city should serve its residents by providing effective services and fostering real opportunities for everyone, not by lecturing and training them on identity politics. Following our January 27th virtual council meeting, I will give notice of a notice of motion to halt DEI programs and policies in Pickering and block using your tax dollars to hire a nearly One Hundred Thousand Dollar a year DEI officer. It’s time we prioritize fiscal responsibility and practical governance over ideological fads. The divisive nature of DEI is clear, and the evidence from the corporate world shows us that it doesn’t lead to success—it leads to failure. Time to focus on real issues like homelessness, rebuilding infrastructure, fostering economic growth, lowering property taxes, the reckless spending of your tax dollars, and ensuring the safety of our neighborhoods, to name a few. These are the issues that matter to Pickering residents, not divisive and expensive programs that pit people against one another. Time to learn from the mistakes of others. The corporate world is moving away from DEI because it has proven to be a failure. It’s time for Pickering to follow suit and focus on what truly matters. The people of Pickering. By redirecting our resources and efforts, we can build a city that works for everyone—not just those pushing ideological agendas. I encourage you to review the May 6th meeting on Youtube yourself to see where I stood on this issue. The link is provided for full transparency. I am Lisa Robinson, the People’s Councillor, and I remain committed to advocating for policies and change that serve our city and its people—not empty agendas that divide and control us. Time to rebuild trust in our community. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iokQOZP4ezs

Ontario's Solar Panel Promise: Why Did It Lose Its Shine?

Ontario's Solar Panel Promise: Why Did It Lose Its Shine? By Dale Jodoin Once upon a time, Ontario promised a greener future. The government introduced the Feed-In Tariff (FIT) and microFIT programs, which encouraged homeowners and businesses to install solar panels on their rooftops. The dream was simple: generate clean energy, reduce dependency on oil, and earn money by feeding electricity back into the grid. But today, many feel betrayed. What went wrong? A Promising Start In the early days, the Ontario government offered significant financial incentives for those who participated. Homeowners could earn as much as 80.2 cents per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated. For many, this was a no-brainer. Solar panels became a symbol of hope—a chance for individuals to fight climate change while earning extra income. However, as years went by, the shine of this promise dulled. By 2017, the payments had been slashed to as low as 19.2 cents per kilowatt-hour. The program itself was discontinued, leaving thousands who invested in solar panels wondering why the government had changed course. Broken Promises and Angry Homeowners For people like Sarah Clarke of Oshawa, the program was more than just an investment; it was a commitment to a greener future. "I believed in it," she said. "I wanted to do my part, but now I’m stuck with a leaky roof from the solar panels, and there’s no help to fix it. Sarah isn’t alone. Many homeowners who took part in the program now face expensive repairs. Solar panels can cause roofing issues, and without the financial benefits initially promised, homeowners feel abandoned. "We trusted the government," Sarah said. "Now they’ve moved on, and we’re left with the mess." Cheaper Panels, Higher Costs The solar panel industry has also changed dramatically. Panels manufactured in China have made solar installations more affordable, but there’s a catch. The Canadian government has imposed tariffs on some imported goods, including solar panels, which could drive up prices. Critics argue this will increase costs for those who want to install panels in the future. "If the government wants us to go green, why are they making it harder and more expensive?" asked Sarah. "They talk about green energy all the time, but where’s the support for people like us who took the leap years ago?" The Shift Away from Rooftop Solar The Ontario government has shifted its focus to other green energy initiatives, such as large-scale solar farms and energy efficiency programs. While these efforts aim to address climate change on a broader scale, they leave individual homeowners feeling left out. "The FIT program made us feel like we were part of the solution," Sarah said. "Now, we’re just ignored." The Bigger Picture Ontario’s shift reflects a broader trend in green energy policy. Governments are moving away from small-scale initiatives in favor of larger projects that are easier to manage and more cost-effective. But for people like Sarah, this shift feels like a betrayal. "We did what they asked us to do," she said. "We believed in the green dream. But now they’ve taken it away and left us with nothing." What’s Next for Solar in Ontario? The rising cost of solar panels, combined with the lack of support for homeowners, has left many wondering if the promise of green energy was ever genuine. Critics argue the government has talked a good game about climate change but failed to deliver meaningful support for individuals who want to make a difference. "The government loves to talk about green energy," Sarah said. "But it feels like it’s all talk. Where’s the action? Where’s the help for people like me?" The dream of a solar-powered Ontario hasn’t disappeared, but for many, it feels out of reach. Homeowners who embraced the government’s vision of rooftop solar feel abandoned, stuck with costly repairs and dwindling financial benefits. If Ontario is serious about green energy, it must do more than talk. It must listen to people like Sarah Clarke and provide the support they need—not just for the future, but for the promises made in the past. Until then, the shine of Ontario’s solar promise will remain dimmed.

The Home Inspection

By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist Is a home inspection really necessary and if so, what should I expect from one? The home inspection plays a pivotal role in the purchase of any home, even new homes. A home inspection is important for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is to determine whether or not the home is sound. On a recent home inspection visit, the inspector sent out a pre inspection list just prior to the visit which listed the items that are checked during a home inspection as well as confirmation of who would be present during the inspection. All parties met at the house at the agreed time and were introduced to the inspector. The home inspector brought all of his own tools and set immediately about his routine. We were told that along with actual testing of certain things and the general looking and gauging, there would be pictures of everything along with explanations for the purchasers upon completion. The big-ticket items were checked of course, the roof, foundation, plumbing, wiring HVAC system. Other things that were also included were things like the windows, fencing, porch, patio, and garage. I was pleasantly surprised to see in the report things like loose handrail, noisy range hood. These were things that were evident when using or turning on. I felt it made the report more comprehensive. At the end of the inspection, the home inspector came into the kitchen where the family of the purchasers were, and went through everything he had noted, albeit briefly. The complete and comprehensive report would follow with photos of everything along with explanations. This was just a courtesy given that the family was there. At the end of his summary, he asked the family if anyone had any questions. The parents of both purchasers had questions. The Inspector took his time and answered in detail. The purchasers came away very happy with the inspection. The inspection did not uncover anything that was not readily seen to someone walking through the house. In this particular case, the inspection was not used to negotiate a better price due to needed repairs or anything like that which can be the case in some instances. Later that day the purchasers advised that they had received a digital file with numerous pictures and explanations of what they were looking at. The inspection in this case was just over two hours but some are three hours plus. This depends a great deal on whether or not the inspector can gain access to certain areas. While you are covered under the Terrion warranty in the province of Ontario for brand new builds, some home buyers still insist on a home inspection. A home inspection in Durham Region will run you anywhere from $400-600 but is well worth it for peace of mind, and is always recommended by any reputable Realtor. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

2025 Job Market: What Is Not Changing

By Nick Kossovan The phrase "resistance is futile"—commonly associated with the Borgs, fictional aliens who are recurring antagonists in the Star Trek franchise—is one job seekers would be wise to heed. Every day, I see job seekers spending (read: wasting) time and energy fighting against core principles and human behaviour truisms that aren't budging anytime soon. Thanks to technological advancements, shifting economic and geopolitical landscapes, and generational adjustments in the workplace, today's job market is brutal. Job searching, hiring, and employee experience aren't what they once were. However, some aspects haven't and won't be changing, regardless of how much you wish they would. Therefore, it's wise to accept that employers operate within certain universal truths and changes in norms have re-defined the concept of professionalism. Profitability is an employer's top priority. Ultimately, businesses exist to make a profit. Regardless of what happens in 2025 and beyond, this core principle of capitalism will remain constant. This is why the most effective approach to landing a job is to show and articulate to employers what most job seekers don't: how you’ll impact the company's profitability. Why should an employer hire you if you aren't going to add measurable value to their business? No numbers = No value to employers Identify ways to quantify your achievements (increased, decreased, improved, saved, handled, collected, processed) and present your achievement numbers—numbers are the language of business—to demonstrate the value you added to your previous employers. Your LinkedIn profile is paramount in your job search and career. Your LinkedIn profile isn't just an online résumé; it's your 24/7/365 personal billboard. When done right, it's an around-the-clock employer magnet. Your LinkedIn profile needs to provide compelling reasons why an employer should hire you, which starts with, as I pointed out, presenting your results using numbers. More than ever, employers are turning to LinkedIn to find candidates—rather than posting jobs and weeding through hundreds of resumes, most of which won't meet the qualifications—vet their qualifications and evaluate their professional demeanour. Because of its far-reaching visibility, your LinkedIn profile is much more important than your resume, which is only seen by those you share it with. Having a polished, up-to-date LinkedIn profile is non-negotiable. Ensure your profile has a professional headshot, a captivating headline, and a summary showcasing your skills, experiences, and accomplishments. Engage with industry-related content and regularly update your profile to reflect new skills and experiences to keep yourself visible and position yourself as a professional in your field. Having a professional network The adage "It's not what you know, but who you know" will always be a truism. People serious about their career cultivate a professional network through which they can learn about job openings, industry trends, and potential mentors. Make 2025 the year you attend industry conferences, join relevant professional organizations, and actively engage on LinkedIn and other social media platforms. TIP: Networking is about forming relationships and providing value to others; it's not about seeking anything. When meeting someone for the first time, ask yourself, "How can I help this person?" Being a SME (Subject Matter Expert) Employers love experts, especially experts with a track record of producing results. Due to the increasing compartmentalization of work, SMEs—professionals with deep knowledge in specific areas—are increasingly in demand. SME status enhances your employability dramatically. Becoming a Subject Matter Expert (SME) is not an overnight achievement, but it's a journey worth taking as it'll significantly enhance your employability. It starts with investing time in continuous learning, attending workshops, obtaining certifications, and keeping up with industry trends. Then, share your knowledge and insights through articles, presentations, social media, and actively participating in online discussions. Maintaining a positive mindset Job searching can be daunting and disheartening. However, maintaining a positive mindset is essential. Employers favour candidates who will contribute positively to their culture. When you cultivate and maintain a positive mindset, you become more likeable. Likeability is a job seeker's biggest asset. Being likeable supersedes your skills and experience. Hiring managers don't hire candidates they don't like. A sense of entitlement turns off employers. Many job seekers expect jobs to be handed to them because they have a degree or some experience. This "I'm owed!" belief is why most job seekers have a frustrating job search. Focus on what you can offer an employer. Show your willingness to adapt, learn, and contribute to the employer's success. Understandably, employers gravitate towards candidates who show initiative and a strong work ethic over those who expect to be given opportunities. Ghosting is part of job searching. The "Tinder" generation dominates recruitment; therefore, save your breath. Ghosting, where employers cease all communication without explanation, is here to stay. Accept that being ghosted means you didn't get the job. You don't own your job; your employer does. Ever since an employer created a job—around 3,000 BCE in ancient Mesopotamia, a Sumerian named Kesh is believed to have been the first paid employee—jobs have been owned by employers, not employees. Layoffs highlight this fact, which is why it's wise to maintain a nimble and proactive approach to your career. Navigating 2025's job market will require: · Accepting what you can't control. · Focusing on creating and maintaining a professional network. · Being that rare candidate who demonstrates how they'll enhance profits—the reason the employer exists. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

The End of the Second Trudeau Era

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The New Year 2025 has brought us interesting surprises. There was the announcement made on the 6th of January by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that he intends to hand in his resignation as the Liberal Party Leader. This was an interesting day, automatically making us think about what happened on the same day in 2020 in the United States, even though something different was in our minds. The announcement of the Prime Minister was made on the same day that the Parliament of Canada was prorogued until 24th of March. The resignation of the Prime Minister also initiated a leadership action in the Liberal Party of Canada in order to choose a leader capable of withstanding the pressure from the Conservative Party of Canada, the official opposition. By now, we have seen that many polls indicate a commanding two digit lead by the Conservative Party, which means that if an election were called today, they would win a majority of seats in parliament. The governing Liberals have few options looking forward. An election has to be called soon; either in the late spring or in the early fall at the latest, because all the major opposition parties in parliament are ready to topple the minority government. Looking at the candidates in the Liberal leadership race, though we are in the early stages, there is more and more talk about the entrance of Mark Carney into the leadership race. If Carney, former Chairman of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, is elected, he will present a real challenge to the leader of the Conservative Party, Pierre Poilievre. Let us be clear. The Justin Trudeau era began with his rebuilding the Liberal Party and, in the 2015 election, bringing it to power. His ascent to power was also made possible by the inability of the Conservative Party to clearly see what was going on in the Canadian electorate. With a tired Prime Minister Harper supported by an incompetent staff dealing with the reality of the moment, the success of the Liberal Party under the Leadership of Justin Trudeau was greatly facilitated. The potential leadership of Mark Carney would put a new element into play in the upcoming election. Suddenly the Trudeau factor will no longer count and the old slogan of “killing the gas tax” associated with him is unlikely to work anymore, having been battered to death. Add to this the fact that the same staff and advisors who lost the 2015 election for Stephen Harper still have a commanding influence; an interesting election looms on the horizon. It will be a Conservative Party loss rather than a Liberal win. Reflecting on the Justin Trudeau era which has just ended, we can make some interesting observations. In his early days as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau was "cool", with a majority of the youth electorate voting for him and admiring him. In the year that followed his majority sweep into power, he appeared in the pages of Vogue, on the cover of a Marvel comic book and other important media. He really created a movement in 2015 and he got a lot of young people engaged. However, the same people are asking for change today, and looking for a different leader, having lost confidence in him for not delivering his promise of a better life. Elections Canada data from the 2015 election showed that 57 per cent of voters aged 18 to 24 cast a ballot, an increase of 18.3 percentage points from the almost 39 per cent recorded in the 2011 election. Research conducted by Abacus Data following the 2015 vote suggested Liberals won the support of 45 per cent of young voters. Let’s face it, Canadians had a kind of parasocial relationship with Trudeau at the time. He had grown up in the public eye because of his father, former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, so people felt like they knew him. However, reality checked in, and the image started to fade. It all started in 2018 when Trudeau and his family took a much-ridiculed trip to India. They were photographed, over and over again, wearing clothes more appropriate for a wedding than a state visit. Then people started seeing it as: he's a bit of a phoney, and all of a sudden, some people were able to move from giving him the benefit of the doubt to realizing that instead of being authentic, he was actually manipulating them. Then, over time, the disconnect between promise and delivery broadened and that becomes a fundamental problem when you are dealing with a brand: the Trudeau brand. As a brand, Justin Trudeau was failing on a lot of promises because he was creating expectations that he was not fulfilling. He was dogged by a litany of scandals, from the SNC-Lavalin affair that saw two female cabinet ministers -- justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and health minister Jane Philpott -- resign, to the surfacing of old photos and video of Trudeau wearing black- and brown-face. Trudeau didn't live up to his feminist, culturally sensitive promise. Although Canadians re-elected Trudeau in 2019, he was knocked down to a minority government. The Liberals were unable to regain a majority in 2021. Therefore, Canada is in real turmoil on the brink of the crucial take over by President Trump’s Administration. It will be interesting to follow the quick succession of events that are to come. Let us hope that Canadian politicians will be able to navigate these dangerous high seas in the interest of preserving the very existence of Canada.

Outbreak of Respiratory Illness in China: What You Need to Know

By Dale Jodoin In recent weeks, hospitals across China have been overwhelmed with cases of severe respiratory illnesses, particularly among children. People are calling it the "White Lung" outbreak because of its impact on the lungs, leading to pneumonia, high fevers, and other symptoms that resemble respiratory infections. This has raised concerns, with many wondering if this is the start of another global health crisis like COVID-19. However, the good news is that health experts believe the current outbreak is caused by a known virus and not a new or unknown disease. This article aims to break down the situation, explain what's happening, and provide you with the facts in a simple and easy-to-understand way. It’s important to remember that I’m not a doctor—this information is publicly available on the internet, and I’m simply bringing it together to help you stay informed. The outbreak has caused a surge in hospital visits, especially among children under the age of 14. Many of them are experiencing cold-like symptoms that progress into more serious issues like bronchitis or pneumonia. Videos and reports from northern provinces in China show overcrowded hospitals, with parents anxiously waiting to get medical help for their children. Chinese health officials have confirmed that this outbreak is primarily due to a virus called human metapneumovirus (HMPV). This virus is not new; it has been known to medical science for years. HMPV often causes mild symptoms, similar to the common cold, but it can be more severe for young children, the elderly, and people with weak immune systems. Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) is part of a family of viruses that affect the respiratory system. It was first discovered in 2001, and it’s believed to have been circulating among humans for many decades. Most people get infected with HMPV at some point in their lives, often during childhood. For most healthy individuals, HMPV causes symptoms like: Cough Runny nose Sore throat Mild fever However, for vulnerable groups, it can lead to more serious conditions such as: Bronchitis (inflammation of the airways) Pneumonia (infection in the lungs) Severe breathing difficulties There is currently no vaccine or specific treatment for HMPV. Doctors usually focus on relieving symptoms, such as using fever reducers, staying hydrated, and resting. Although HMPV is not a new virus, the outbreak has caused concern for several reasons: High Number of Cases: The sheer volume of patients has overwhelmed hospitals, especially in northern parts of China. This has drawn comparisons to the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Severity Among Children: Many of the reported cases are in young children, who are more vulnerable to respiratory illnesses. The symptoms appear to escalate quickly, leading to complications like pneumonia. Timing: Winter is traditionally a season for respiratory infections, but the scale of this outbreak has raised alarms among public health experts. Preparedness: China has learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and is now monitoring cases of pneumonia more closely. They’ve even launched programs to track pneumonia of unknown origins to better handle potential new outbreaks in the future. The situation in China is serious for the people living there, but it is not yet a global health crisis. Here’s why: Known Cause: Unlike COVID-19 in its early days, this outbreak is caused by a virus that scientists already understand—HMPV. This means health experts know how it spreads and who is most at risk. Localized Impact: So far, the outbreak is concentrated in certain parts of China, and there’s no indication that it has spread widely to other countries. Seasonal Trends: It’s common to see a rise in respiratory infections during winter. Viruses like HMPV, influenza, and RSV (another respiratory virus) tend to spread more during cold months. However, it’s always good to be cautious. Respiratory viruses spread through droplets in the air, so simple precautions like washing your hands regularly, wearing a mask in crowded areas, and staying home when sick can help protect you and those around you. Chinese health authorities are taking this outbreak seriously. They have launched a pilot program to monitor cases of pneumonia of unknown origin. This program is designed to detect and respond to new diseases more quickly, preventing another situation like COVID-19 from catching the world off guard. Hospitals in the affected areas are also working hard to treat patients and manage the high demand for care. While the current focus is on treating symptoms, researchers are always looking for new ways to fight viruses like HMPV, including developing vaccines. There is always a chance that respiratory illnesses can spread to other parts of the world, especially with international travel. However, experts believe this outbreak is unlikely to grow into a global pandemic. That said, it’s important to remain vigilant. The lessons we learned during the COVID-19 pandemic—such as the importance of hygiene, vaccines, and staying informed—are still relevant today. If you live outside of China, the best thing you can do is keep an eye on local health updates. In the meantime, following these steps can help reduce your risk of getting sick: Practice Good Hygiene: Wash your hands frequently with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. Avoid Close Contact: Stay away from people who are sick, and avoid touching your face with unwashed hands. Stay Healthy: Get enough sleep, eat a balanced diet, and stay physically active to keep your immune system strong. What Does the Future Look Like? Experts predict that respiratory illnesses like HMPV will continue to spread during the winter months but will likely decrease as the weather warms up. Scientists are also studying viruses like HMPV more closely to develop vaccines or treatments in the future. Programs like the one China has launched to monitor pneumonia of unknown origin could help the world respond faster to similar outbreaks in the future. The current outbreak in China is a reminder that respiratory viruses are still a major health concern, especially during the winter months. While the situation is serious, there’s no need for panic. The outbreak is caused by a known virus, human metapneumovirus, and health experts are actively monitoring the situation. Remember to take simple precautions to protect yourself and others, especially during flu season. Stay informed, but don’t let fear take over. By working together and learning from past experiences, we can handle challenges like this more effectively. Disclaimer I am not a doctor, and this article is based on information that is freely available across the internet. My goal is to bring this information together to help you understand the situation better. For personalized medical advice, please consult a healthcare professional.

First time home buyers

First time home

buyers By Theresa Grant - Real Estate Columnist Ah, the first-time home buyer. A special breed. Joyful, optimistic, eager yet hesitant at the same time. Given the price of real estate these days, first time home buyers come in all different age ranges. Years ago, your typical first timer would be in their late twenties to mid thirties. Now it’s not uncommon to find first timers in their forties and fifties. There is also a situation that qualifies some as first-time home buyers even if they have owned a home previously. If you have owned a home previously but have not owned a home in the last five years, you qualify as a first-time home buyer. Younger first timers need a little more guidance than their older counterparts to know the right questions to ask and what should be top concerns when walking through a potential contender for their first home purchase. That may be simply that older home buyers may have lived in newer and older houses and know what they may contend with a homeowner. We think back to the houses we grew up in and remember certain characteristics of that house and can compare and ask questions based on that. Some however, grew up in apartments and that gives them a different set of questions and concerns. It is always recommended regardless of how many times you’ve purchased a home that you have a home inspection from a qualified home inspector. That can provide you with peace of mind when it comes to anything that may be hidden from plain view. Problems with moisture or foundation are good examples of something that may be hidden or somewhat hidden for the average person just taking a walk through the property. Some things that a first-time home buyer may overlook can seem common and others may wonder how that could not be addressed or overlooked however, when you are out looking at homes certain things can just escape you. This can be due to excitement or being completely enamoured with a property. I find that some of my first time homebuyers will get into a property and be completely taken aback at the fact that they have qualified for such a nice place and may overlook some pretty important facts. On the whole, house hunting can be somewhat overwhelming, and it doesn’t hurt to bring a detached person with you to point out things that you may be overlooking or that simply didn’t occur to you. I remember going through a property with home buyers and the houses were so close together there was really no where to put the snow. When I asked the potential home buyer where they would put the snow, they responded with shock and dismay because it was mid June with no though to where one might put the shovelled snow. First time homebuyers are gearing up for a busy 2025 and will make up a huge percentage of home buyers next year. With this in mind, if you are planning on buying a home next year as rates are expected to continue to drop, it may be a good idea to have a list of questions with you. As well, make a list of things that are important to you like electrical outlets in certain rooms so you can remember to check them. A friend, parent or sibling is always a welcome additionon tours and can prove very beneficial. How ever you want to approach it, a little preparation can go a long way in the house hunt. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

Opinion: The Mayor’s Fear-Mongering and Lies Have Gone Too Far

Opinion: The Mayor’s Fear-Mongering and Lies Have Gone Too Far By Lisa Robinson The propaganda machine at the City of Pickering is in overdrive, spinning a narrative of fear and intimidation to justify their increasingly authoritarian decisions. The recent video released by the Mayor and the corporation of the city is not only laughable but deeply insulting to anyone with a shred of critical thinking skills. Let’s dissect this farce for what it is: a blatant attempt to silence dissent, consolidate power, and rig the democratic process. First, let’s address the Mayor’s glaring inability to keep his story straight. In a statement to Global News, he admitted that the city planned to move to virtual meetings for a year starting this summer due to council chamber renovations. Yet, in the same breath, the city releases a propaganda video claiming the shift to virtual meetings is necessary because of threats and fear for safety. Which is it, Mr. Mayor? If the chambers were under renovation all along, why weaponize the narrative of fear to justify this move? The contradiction is glaring, and the manipulation is appalling. Now, let’s tackle the absurdity of the fear narrative itself. If the Mayor and council were genuinely terrified for their safety, would they bring their wives, children, and even the Mayor’s 8-year-old granddaughter to council meetings? Let’s not forget their enthusiastic attendance at public events, store openings, and photo ops – all without a police presence. It’s clear they don’t believe their own fabricated story. This is nothing more than a cheap ploy to garner sympathy and support for their oppressive agenda. And that agenda? It’s as transparent as it is dangerous. Pickering’s council has been tirelessly lobbying Premier Ford and Minister Calandra to amend the Municipal Act, giving them the power to remove an elected official and bar them from running in subsequent elections. Let’s call this what it is: election tampering. It’s an attempt to eliminate political opponents and rig the democratic process to maintain their grip on power. This is not governance; this is authoritarianism dressed up in the guise of public safety. Adding insult to injury, when I brought forward a notice of motion to move our 2 PM executive meetings to 7 PM to promote public engagement, the Mayor shut it down, saying he’d rather have all meetings during the day. Public transparency? Not on this council’s watch. The Mayor himself has been caught watching Monday night sports during council sessions, demonstrating just how seriously he takes his responsibilities. It’s no wonder he’s pushing for online meetings – they offer a convenient way to mute dissent, turn off mics, and avoid accountability. The hypocrisy here is staggering. While pretending to care about public safety, this council is actively perpetuating a toxic environment of fear and intimidation. They’ve sent trespass notices to grandmothers, stationed 14 police officers at meetings with low attendance, and painted critics as dangerous threats. It’s the classic “boy who cried wolf” fable, only now it’s taxpayers who foot the bill for this sham. Meanwhile, actual crimes in Pickering go unattended as police are diverted to guard council chambers against nonexistent dangers. Finally, let’s not overlook the timing of this shift to virtual meetings. Conveniently, the Mayor is now off on a month-long vacation. What better time to avoid scrutiny and public engagement than when you’re sipping cocktails in some far-off destination? It’s a disgraceful display of arrogance and contempt for the people of Pickering. The people deserve better than this circus of lies, fear-mongering, and self-serving manipulation. It’s time for accountability. The Mayor and council must be held responsible for their blatant disregard for democracy, their misuse of public resources, and their shameless attempts to silence those who dare to speak out. Pickering, you deserve leaders who fight for you, not against you. I’m Councillor Lisa Robinson, and I will not be silenced.

Jobseekers Need to Learn to ‘Move On’

Jobseekers Need to Learn to ‘Move On’ By Nick Kossovan Everyone knows ghosting and rejection are inherent parts of job searching. Yet, job seekers waste vast amounts of energy and time lamenting what they can't control. There's a prevalent sense of entitlement that employers owe job seekers, which goes against the universal truth that nobody is owed anything, be it a job, to make a living or even happiness. Job searching, regardless of the economic climate, has always required resilience. The key to resilience is having realistic expectations, such as understanding that employers you don't work for don't owe you anything. Having a 'F*ck it!' mindset that empowers you to move on quickly, so you find sooner rather than later that employer who 'gets you' and is willing to hire you is how you foster resilience. · Ghosted: You didn't get the job. Move on. · You didn't hear from an employer after submitting your resume: There were candidates with more relevant experience and were a better cultural fit. Move on · When a networking reach out attempt fails: A stranger isn't willing to drop everything to help you. Move on. · Not taking down a job posting: Some people never take down their Christmas decorations. If a job can be left open for a significant amount of time, assume it isn't critical. Do you want a non-critical or non-essential job? Move on. Wishing how hiring should be won't get you a job. Getting frustrated and angry at how an employer designed their hiring process won't get you a job. Getting upset over being ghosted—it wasn't the employer who ghosted you; it was an employee whose behaviour doesn't speak for an entire company who ghosted you—won't get you a job. Life is too short to spend time and energy dwelling on "what could have been" and "whys." This is especially true regarding things out of your control, such as how an employer designs their hiring process or runs their business. The most common false belief I repeatedly see people hold, and which causes much of their frustrations and anger, is that they can change other people's behaviour—as if it's their place to do so. While it's natural to feel disheartened, it's crucial to understand that wallowing in the many disappointments you'll experience throughout your job search and believing you can control other people's behaviour hinders your progress. When you invest your heart and soul into an application only to be met with silence or rejection, it's easy to spiral into self-doubt. Consider why you're giving a hiring manager—a stranger—influence over your self-esteem. Hence why I recommend embracing a 'F*ck it!' mindset as a defence against rejection eroding your confidence. I've been rejected many times more than I've been accepted. I've learned the hard way, a running theme throughout my life, that if I permit it to do so, repeated rejection triggers a cycle of negative thinking that paralyzes me, regardless of whether I'm searching for work, submitting my writing, or reaching out to someone hoping to form a relationship. Dwelling on past disappointments sabotages future opportunities. There are many reasons why quickly moving on, as opposed to wallowing, playing the "I'm a victim!" card, getting angry, or venting on LinkedIn and other social media platforms—which is never a good look—benefits your job search. 1. There's no shortage of opportunities. In several previous columns, I've mentioned that opportunities are all around you, with one caveat: they're attached to people. In 2024, employers are turning to their employees for referrals since job postings result in avalanches of applications, predominantly from job seekers who spray and pray. This underscores the importance of networking rather than applying to online job listings. Clinging to rejections, being ghosted, or whatever is frustrating you is wasting mental energy you could be using to speak to people who may be able to refer you to job openings where they work. Starting right now, shift your focus away from past disappointments—forget about them, what's done is done, you can't change the past—and focus on future possibilities aligned with your skills and aspirations and start making it a point to meet people, because you never know what opportunities they may be attached to. 2. Much of the hiring process is out of your control. In the same way that you can't control the behaviour of others, you can't control how an employer hires. Many factors influence hiring decisions, notably internal politics and team dynamics. Instead of internalizing these setbacks, remind yourself of your skills, experiences, and past achievements. 3. Not quickly moving on is counterproductive. Dwelling on why you were ghosted or didn't get the job—instances in which you'll never know the actual reason—drains your energy, energy better spent on proactive measures to enhance your candidacy for future roles. The key to a successful job search is to keep moving forward and stay focused on what you can control, such as optimizing your LinkedIn profile—arguably the most critical tool in a job seeker's arsenal—resume and expanding your network to take advantage of all the opportunities around you. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

The video

the video By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States By now you have read or seen it in the media. City of Pickering Mayor, released a video attempting to justify cutting access to the public by claiming that some un-recognized, alt-right group is creating an environment of danger to council members and staff. That this same group has cause havoc during public open meetings and brought about a sense of hostility to the municipal meetings protocols. This causing a sense of fear among council and staff. On the surface, you have to take it at face value that if this is true. It is awful. How can any group bring forth such chaos. By watching this video. It becomes obvious that the video is not about some alt-right movement. But instead it is frame after frame attempt to discredit a fellow council member. The barrage of clips denouncing the actions of one council member in my opinion are not grounds to make such claims as that the city is under siege and that there is any danger over the horizon. The video is nothing short of an attempt to mislead the public and create a sense of fear mongering. Just about every municipality across the Region get their share of upset callers, at times with a threatening over tone. Are we to shut down all access to government? The video also attempts to create a sense of fear mongering and false assumptions that Pickering has been selected by this un-disclosed or identified alt-right movement the Mayor so seems to fear. If such fear is real. Why have not one police report been filed? In reality after following City of Pickering council for the past two years. All, I noticed is that the people of Pickering demand answers and every time they are faced with hostility from the City. Including the mayor that now is crying wolf. This is wrong. The City prides itself on being inclusive, diverse and promote equality. When by their actions they are exclusive, selective and dispense their version of equality based on how the City will benefit politically. I have been a municipal critic for the past 30 years. This video is a real poor example of the Mayor attempting to create fear where there is none. He is the instigator. He is the one that shuts people down during public meeting and subsequently people react. So he has taken the practice... OF SHUT UP SIT DOWN OR ELSE to a new height. Ever since STRONG MAYOR POWERS has come to play. The ego has swollen and it is ‘do as we tell you or you will be removed and issued a NO TRESPASS notice.’ This is where the problem lies. Surely, this type of abusive attitude is being noticed across Canada. Surely, many people from many backgrounds have taken notice. The video released by the mayor in my opinion is contradiction to the City own City Code of Conduct policy. Where is the integrity commissioner? Oh wait, they are paid by the city. This video, I think was a huge mistake by the mayor as it shows his dislike for one particular member of council. The video clearly is an attempt to discredit her integrity in the community. To make a false association that this councillor has ties to a group that he has failed to prove. The video shows the level of abuse by the mayor as he clearly violates his own City Code of Conduct and openly displays his misogynistic attitude towards a fellow member of council. Peace does not come about by the escalation of hostility and this is what this video is.

Canada looking forward to 2025

Canada looking forward to 2025 by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The year just beginning could be an interesting one, with turning points in politics, economics and culture, provided that common sense and moral clarity prevails both at home and abroad. Frankly, the geopolitical situation in the world is most concerning. The two regional wars in Ukraine and Gaza have the potential to spread, provoking direct confrontation between NATO and the western democracies in general, versus Russia, Iran, North Korea and China. Ukraine now stands to lose significant international interest and support. In the United States in particular, it has become a distant second (and increasingly third or lower) policy priority with the new Trump administration becoming more and more skeptical about offering further help. The conflict is likely to escalate with unforeseen consequences. In the conflict between Israel, Hamas and Hezbolah there is no obvious way to end the fighting and the collapse of Syria’s Bashar government is adding to the chaos. Whatever the military outcome, a dramatic increase in radicalization is a certainty. On the one hand, the Israeli Jews feel globally isolated and even hated after facing the worst violence against them since the Holocaust. On the other hand, the Palestinians face what they consider a genocide. With scarce opportunities for peace and no prospect of escape, this situation has the potential of developing into a wider conflict in the region. Deep and dangerous political divisions over the conflict permeate the Middle East, engulfing over one billion people in the broader Muslim world, not to mention the United States and Europe. New and problematic situations are developing in the Arabian Sea, in South America between Venezuela and Guyana, not to mention the increasing tensions in the South China Sea. None of these major military conflicts has adequate guardrails to prevent them from getting worse. What is most problematic is that none of the belligerents agrees on what they are fighting over. Upcoming elections in 2025 pose additional challenges in Canada. Fully one-third of the global population will go to the polls this year. However, in terms of world security, stability and economic outlook, the new Trump administration in the US, with its 25% import tariff on the horizon will pose the most consequential challenge by far. In the face of all this turmoil, Canada has generally been missing in action on the international scene. Even worse, our country has sometimes undermined its own international standing. Sitting at the international table requires a moral compass, professionalism, determination and military self sufficiency. A military free-rider will not be tolerated for long. Canada’s decision to act as a self-important virtue-signaller irritates allies who must shoulder our share of the burden, as well as third-world countries who see Canada’s posturing as post-colonial arrogance. On the domestic scene, Canada is facing a challenging year both economically and politically. There is a real prospect of recession and a future depreciation of the standard of living unless drastic measures are taken. The Liberal government seems to have lost its direction. Overwhelmed by the issues, it seems to have no solution for upcoming events, and continues to be influenced by the policies of the World Economic Forum (WEF). The World Economic Forum, which will meet in mid January, continues to try to influence global governmental, industrial and social agendas. Its “Great Reset” envisages a new economic and social order based on a futuristic globalist approach that would reduce national interests through pervasive oversight mechanisms, including central bank digital currencies. In essence, it is encouraging woke social and economic policies in order to implement a new futuristic globalist world order following a trend in line with “deja vue” fake Marxist theories but far more sophisticated and deceptive. Forum chairman Klaus Schwab has assured elite Davos attendees that “The future belongs to us”. Comforting words for those jealously guarding their influence and accustomed to ignoring rules that apply only to the plebe. Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney are on the WEF board of trustees and Justin Trudeau’s Liberal party certainly reflects its centre-left technocratic view. However, the sudden resignation of Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister and deputy Prime Minister has thrown the governing Liberal Party in turmoil and is challenging the leadership of Prime Minister Trudeau with unknown consequences. On the economic front, Canadians’ personal prosperity, as measured by GDP per capita, is projected to continue to decline this year by more than two per cent. To address affordability and the dismal outlook for long-term productivity, the federal government needs to shift focus from identity politics and climate obsession to economic growth, fiscal responsibility and raising Canadians’ standard of living. In the hope that this year will be a better one and our politicians will put the national interest and the wellbeing of our citizens in the forefront, let us be optimistic. The year has just started. I hope you will take all these thoughts in the spirit they are intended: We have entered a year of grave concern, but let us be supported by the hope that tough times bring out the best in us. Happy New Year 2025!

Job Seekers: Be Clear on Your “Secret Sauce”

Job Seekers: Be Clear on Your “Secret Sauce” By Nick Kossovan Most job seekers present themselves to employers as a jack of all trades, master of none, when they should be presenting a unique set of skills. You think you’re talented. Everyone you’re up against thinks they’re talented. What makes you special? When you apply for a job, possessing the necessary skills and qualifications is not enough. You need to find ways to differentiate yourself; otherwise, you will blend in with the other job seekers you're competing against. The key to differentiating yourself and rising above all the noise so you're seen and heard rather than ignored lies in your "secret sauce"—the unique skills, experiences, and attributes that make you one-of-a-kind. Thus, you become what most job seekers aren't: memorable. Asking yourself the following questions will help you define your secret sauce: 1. In my current or previous positions, what were my favourite tasks? For the most part, we enjoy activities we're good at (e.g., working with numbers, designing costumes, conducting research, organizing events, writing blogs) because our inherent strengths and aptitudes create a natural talent for the activity, thereby making it enjoyable since you’re not fighting who you are. List everything, work-related and non-work-related, you enjoy doing. 2. What feedback have I received from colleagues or supervisors regarding my work? Reflect on your career journey. Think of all the positive and negative feedback you received, whether in formal performance reviews or an offhand manner, regarding your work or something you did. "I enjoy sitting in on your presentations." "You have a knack for listening." "The way you motivate your team is impressive." 3. What problems have I successfully solved in previous positions? Every position exists to solve a problem. For instance, accountants are hired to monitor a company's incoming revenue and outgoing expenses and oversee its compliance with local tax laws. What problems have you solved for your employers? Increased website traffic? Decreased spending? Increased customer satisfaction? Decreased safety violations? Increased sales? (employers' favourite) 4. What unique experiences or backgrounds do I have that contribute to my skill set? A candidate who grew up in Quebec City will have a competitive edge being fluently bilingual over someone who simply attended French immersion in Calgary, Alberta. The same could be said for a candidate whose mother was a social worker, making them more attuned to the needs of others or their father, who was a pharmaceutical representative, thus exposing them to human dynamics that influence. Everyone has a unique story of how their place of birth and experiences, especially first experiences, developed their strengths and 'passion for.' Explaining to an employer that your enjoyment of providing customer service that's a competitive advantage comes from having spent your weekends and summers working the front desk at your family's 85-room hotel in Estevan, Saskatchewan, has much more impact than simply saying, "I like helping people." 5. What skills have I gained through hobbies or volunteer work? I once hired a call centre agent who volunteered at a local suicide prevention hotline for several years. A candidate who coached a little league baseball team turned out to be one of the best first-time manager I ever hired. Don't ignore the skills and experience you've acquired outside your employment or education. Skills, experience, and knowledge aren't just acquired at work or school. The skills and experience you gain from volunteering, starting/running a business, being a parent, playing in a sports league, or serving on your condo board can be valuable to employers. If the above questions don't solicit as many skills as you'd like, seek the opinions of family members, friends, and colleagues. Ask them what they think your key strengths are. Their insights may surprise you. Once you've identified your hard and soft skills—your soft skills (e.g., communication, critical thinking, time management) are the most important to employers—you need to communicate your unique skills as selling points. Merely listing your "skills" and "qualifications" doesn't distinguish you from other applicants. You must describe who you are and what you offer in a straightforward, memorable narrative conveying your unique value proposition. · Not memorable: "I speak French." · Memorable: "I was born in Quebec City. French is my mother tongue." Additionally, frame your skills and qualifications in terms of how they can benefit an employer. · No value add: "I have strong analytical skills." · Value add: "During my seven years as a financial analyst at Wayne Enterprises, I developed above-average analytical skills that enabled the company to take advantage of several initial public offerings that turned out to be quite lucrative. One recommended buy resulted in a $7.5 million gain within less than a year." Based on my experience, most candidates fail to emphasize their uniqueness; hence, they don't stick in my head. Given the number of candidates I've interviewed throughout my career, one would think I'd have heard many inspiring, funny, entertaining, and sad career and life stories. Unfortunately, that's not the case. Job seekers need to work on being mentally sticky. In a competitive job market filled with qualified candidates, articulating your secret sauce will ultimately set you apart. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

"Silenced for Speaking the Truth: The City of Pickering’s Dirty War Against Transparency and Accountability"

"Silenced for Speaking the Truth: The City of Pickering’s Dirty War Against Transparency and Accountability" By Lisa Robinson Let me make this absolutely clear: what’s happening behind the scenes at the City of Pickering is nothing short of an all-out attack on your right to be informed and my ability to represent you effectively. Since October 2023, Councillor Brenner has been actively working to silence me, trying to block my communication with you through videos and other essential channels. Thanks to an FOI request, we now know that Councillor Brenner has been lobbying the CAO, the mayor, city solicitor, my colleagues on council, and the security manager, to prevent me from using my office to produce my YouTube videos. This is the same individual who once threatened to stick a knife in my back, twist it slowly, and I wouldn’t know until he was ready to pull it out, and who wanted to sharpen his sword and decapate the Mayor. Now, that’s the transparency and honesty we’re getting from this council. After a recent appeal to release redacted emails, it’s clear that Councillor Brenner has been tirelessly working to undermine me. The emails show he’s repeatedly attacked my right to perform my duties as an elected official. He openly claims that because I haven’t “demonstrated any intent to change my behavior” by continuing to speak out about the corruption and wrongdoing within the city, he’s been pushing to strip me of access to municipal facilities. He argues that the Municipal Act doesn’t guarantee that elected officials have access to these resources. He also accuses me of breaching the Ontario Human Rights Code and violating the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act—simply for speaking out about the city of Pickering’s violation of its own flag-raising procedure when they raised the PFLAG flag in the face of the Million Person March for Children. I called this out as a direct assault on those peacefully protesting, accusing the Pickering administration of fueling tensions within the community. And as if that’s not enough, he requested legal advice on the possibility of charging me under Canadian Hate Crime Law. Fast forward to December 2024, and the CAO has issued a directive prohibiting me from using my office to produce videos or host town halls on city property, unless I remain silent about the corruption, collusion, and the truth surrounding what’s happening in the City of Pickering, and stop breaching the city's code of conduct, which in my opinion does not supersede the charter of rights and freedoms. This is not only a blatant attempt to suppress me and prevent me from representing YOU, but it also feels like extortion. If I don't follow the vague and subjective "Code of Conduct," which could easily be twisted to label anything I say as bullying, intimidation, or even threatening—making me face severe consequences, even more than the nine months of pay that I have already lost. And is it also a coincidence that the Integrity Commissioner, Jeff Abrams, when giving the recommendation for my council to sanction me another 3 months of pay on December 16th (Merry Christmas) for my comment, "If I was mayor, I would use the strong mayor powers for good, I would get rid of the CAO, city solicitor, and other directors, as corruption starts at the top. I would tear down city hall, build it back up from the bottom up, and give it back to the people," suggested that he would like to see other avenues as punishment for councillors? He even suggested scenarios such as stripping councillors’ access to city staff or banning those in breach of conduct from entering community centers. These are the kinds of punitive measures he is actively imagining right now. As I have said many times before, I do not believe in coincidences. This my friends is collusion. What’s next? Requests for a criminal investigation against me—based on harmful comments other people say that hurt colleagues’ or staff’s feelings? I do not condone any violence, nor have I ever endorsed actions that compromise anyone's safety or dignity. Yet, instead of acknowledging that, they continue to twist the narratives—all because I keep speaking the truth, calling out inappropriate sexual advances toward me, and exposing psychological harassment. Make no mistake, this isn’t just an attack on me—it’s an assault on your right to hear the truth from your elected representative. This is a calculated, politically motivated effort to silence anyone who dares to speak out against the corruption, the dishonesty, and the backroom dealings taking place in this city. They want to suppress the truth, manipulate the narrative, and control the voices that challenge their power. What they are doing could be considered a form of coercion, collusion, or intimidation, potentially even bordering on extortion. The CAO’s directive, paired with the vague and highly subjective nature of the "Code of Conduct," creates a chilling environment where anything I say—as has already been proven—could be twisted into an accusation of bullying, intimidation, or threatening behavior. This kind of unchecked power is deeply dangerous, as it allows for the suppression of free speech and stifles legitimate concerns—especially when those concerns challenge corruption or expose wrongdoing. The CAO even goes so far as to fabricate words like "burn," attributing them to me—something I never said—deliberately misrepresenting my intent and potentially escalating tensions. And who is this person? None other than someone recently crowned "CAO of the Year" by Municipal World Magazine. Let that sink in. No matter how hard they try to tear me down, I will rise—stronger, louder, and more determined than ever. I will fight not just for the people of Pickering, but for everyone who values common sense, integrity, and the courage to stand up for what’s right. Together, we will shine a light on the truth and take back the power for the people. You deserve the truth. You deserve a voice that stands unwaveringly for you—not for political games, personal agendas, or backroom deals. I am that voice.

Thank you for 2024 Looking Forward 2025 Successes

T

By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States I remember back to 1993. The Oshawa Times had just closed. The community was left in shock after 123 years of service. Without notice. The Times shuts down. After heavy consultation. The Central was born. A new newspaper promising to fill in the shoes of a local giant. Metroland the local coupon clipper that published some news was quick to move in on all the local municipal contracts as at that time they had the distribution network. They published higher numbers. The Central made it’s mission not to compete but to work in the shadows. Slowly chipping away at their corporate strong holds and establish ourselves as the local news source. The Central champions the cause of the under dog. The Central is the only news print that truly gives the general public access to the press. The Central has enjoyed a stellar columnist line ups. From the late honorable Jim Flaherty to Former Mayor Marcel Brunelle of Whitby. Jerry Ouellette, Preston Manning former reform party leader. The list is long and prestigious. The Central successes have bee long and painful as every award every achievement had to be earned through hard work. The Central with offices also in the United States is more than a local power house. The Central is internationally acredited and award winning on various fronts. Did you know that the Central was the first newspaper to have published on line? Did you know that the Central through it’s sister company DURHAM CITY CENTRAL RADIO THE WAVE, was the first company across the planet that broadcasted live radio. Yes, before YouTube and the many other streaming services. The Central in 30 years has been a beacon of excellence in the field of online telecommunications, news print and media. Many have come and gone. All failed. Some due to the fact that did not know how to manage others had no clue on what it takes to survive in this industry. For example the ‘OSHAWA EXPRESS’ with it’s 2000 print was only interested in Oshawa municipal contract. That was all that kept them alive. The NEIGHBOR magazine another fly by night operator that had no clue on what the industry mandated. Gone. One after the other. Just recently Metroland closed. Under bankruptcy protection they are attempting to be an online presence... Once again. All they are doing is suckering in people that do not understand that online has no value for news. People placing ads in these online news groups might as well as burn it. Same affect. Newsprint has undergone some major changes. Those that do not understand the science. Go bankrupt. Those that desperately go online are doomed. The Central success is you. Our readers, advertisers, contributors and our staff. Happy New Year Thank You.

My Christmas Wish List

By Lisa Robinson To The Honourable Doug Ford Premier of Ontario Room 281, Legislative Building, Queen’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A1 Premier@ontario.ca Subject: Protecting Democracy and Safeguarding the Voice of the People File: A1400 - 001 Dear Premier Ford, I am writing to you with deep concern regarding the most recent announcement to amend the Municipal Act. This proposal poses a serious threat to the democratic principles that underpin our nation and erodes the fundamental rights of Canadians to choose the elected officials who represent their voices. The introduction of such sweeping changes must be reconsidered, as it leaves the door wide open for abuse of power, corruption, and collusion among key municipal actors. Allowing council members, mayors, and city-paid Integrity Commissioners to collectively wield the power to remove an elected official sets a dangerous precedent. This approach is ripe for manipulation, retaliation, and political weaponization. It creates an environment where those in positions of influence can conspire to silence dissenting voices, punish political opponents, and skew future election outcomes—in essence, a form of election tampering. The power to elect and remove officials must remain firmly in the hands of the people, not in the hands of those who stand to benefit from their removal. The existing framework already includes mechanisms to address legitimate concerns like harassment, discrimination, or misconduct under workplace and human rights legislation. There is no justifiable reason to grant city councils and Integrity Commissioners the power to overrule the people's choice, especially when existing legal pathways are sufficient to address these issues. The City of Pickering is a stark example of how this system is already being exploited. Council has repeatedly targeted me, Councillor Lisa Robinson, by suspending my pay on three separate occasions—not for misconduct, but for exercising my right to freedom of expression and standing up for the beliefs and priorities of my constituents. My advocacy for transparent governance, my support for the principle that only governmental flags should fly on government buildings, and my call for fair and inclusive access to public restrooms are rooted in the will of the people I represent. Most recently, I face yet another attempt to strip me of three months' pay—my only source of income as a single mother. My so-called "offense" was stating, “If I were to become mayor, I would use strong mayor powers to remove the CAO, city solicitor, and a few directors because corruption starts at the top. I would tear down city hall, build it back up, and give it back to the people.” This is not misconduct—this is political expression. Every elected official should have the right to propose changes, share their vision, and advocate for what they believe is in the best interest of their constituents. Punishing this kind of expression is a gross misuse of power. Meanwhile, there have been far more serious transgressions by other council members that have gone unpunished. One council member has made violent threats towards me, stating they would "stick a knife in [my] back, twist it slowly, and [I] would never know until he was ready to pull it out." The same individual stated they would "sharpen their sword and decapitate the motherf---er" in reference to the mayor. (There is a recording of this comment). I have also endured sexual harassment and psychological harassment. Shockingly, there was no suspension or accountability for these threats or harassment. They were all swept under the carpet. Why? Because of the individual’s status as a senior councillor with close ties to the mayor, CAO, and city Integrity Commissioner. This clear double standard highlights how the proposed changes to the Municipal Act would be weaponized for political gain. The power to remove an elected official should never rest in the hands of council, the mayor, or the bureaucrats employed by the city. It should remain with the people. When municipal actors are permitted to play judge, jury, and executioner, democracy itself is at risk. Why even bother holding elections if those in power can remove their opponents on a whim? This new legislative change would serve as a backdoor to undermine political opposition and ensure only the "preferred" voices remain. I urge every Member of Parliament (MP) and Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) to take a hard look at the implications of this bill. It is not merely an amendment—it is a fundamental attack on the democratic process. When those in power can remove their opposition, they no longer serve the people—they serve only themselves. Minister Calandra, I implore you to reconsider this dangerous course of action. The people's right to choose their representatives is sacred, and any attempt to strip that right away must be met with fierce resistance. We must protect our democracy from corruption, collusion, and authoritarian overreach. If the Municipal Act is to be amended, it should be done to prevent such abuses of power—not to facilitate them. Protecting Democracy and Safeguarding the Voice of the People December 13, 2024 Sincerely, Lisa Robinson City Councillor, Ward 1

Being Angry at Employers for Looking out for Their Interests Won’t Land

By Nick Kossovan The current job market is a stark reminder of a fundamental truth: The employee-employer relationship is inherently asymmetrical. This asymmetry is the default of the employer taking on the risk of investing capital while employees only invest their time. Employers have the upper hand, and the right to work ultimately depends on their decisions, as evidenced by layoffs. Employees don't own their jobs; their employers do. In the face of rejection after rejection, job seekers become frustrated and angry, blaming employers for being unreasonable, greedy, or only looking out for their interests, as if employers are in the business of hiring people. This mindset is counterproductive and will only hinder your ability to land a job. I don't think job seekers are angry with employers. I think they're angry because they were in demand, and now they're not. Recently, the tech industry has had more than its share of layoffs. Most likely, until now, those laid off had only experienced being highly sought after. A shift of this kind requires humility, which is lacking amid all the anger directed at employers. When making a hiring decision, the employer rightfully prioritizes its interests over those of the job seeker. Employers seek candidates who can deliver value and contribute to their organization's success. In contrast, job seekers look for roles that fit their skills, experience, and career goals. Employers looking after their interests aren’t wrong or nefarious; it's simply smart business. Employers' self-interests are not your enemies. Instead, use them to your advantage by identifying them and positioning yourself as the solution. Demonstrating how you'll support the employer's interests will turn you from a generic candidate into an asset. Three strategies can be used to align your self-interests—presumably landing a job—with those of an employer (Envision, "You scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours.”): Understand the employer's priorities, the obvious being to generate profit. Job seekers tend to focus solely on the job description and the required qualifications and overlook the company's overall goal(s). Knowing (read: researching) the company's goals will enable you to explain how your skills and experience can support their goals. Suppose you're applying for a marketing coordinator role at a rapidly growing tech startup. The job posting lists key responsibilities, including managing the company's social media accounts, creating content, and planning events. However, after studying the company holistically, you find, like most companies, it prioritizes gaining new customers. With this knowledge, you can position yourself as a candidate who can help drive that growth by emphasizing, using quantifying numbers (e.g., In eight months, increased Instagram followers from 1,200 to 32,000.) in your resume, LinkedIn profile, cover letter and during your interview, your experience developing high-performing social media campaigns attracting new leads for previous employers. You could mention your innovative ideas for using user-generated content to raise brand awareness or partnering with industry influencers. The key is to show that you possess the required functional skills and understand the company's overall goals and how you can help achieve them. Explain how you'll make your 'to-be' boss's life easier. Your 'to-be' boss is juggling a million competing priorities, budget constraints, and pressure from their boss to optimize their team's productivity. Position yourself as the candidate who'll simplify your 'to-be' boss's life, and you'll differentiate yourself from other candidates. During the interview, make it a point to understand the specific pain points and challenges your 'to-be' boss is facing—I outright ask, "What keeps you up at night?"—and then present yourself as a solution. Perhaps the department has a retention problem. You could tell a STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) story, demonstrating your ability to build strong cross-functional relationships and create a positive work culture that boosts employee engagement and loyalty. Educating your prospective boss that by hiring you, they'll have one less headache is a hard-to-ignore value proposition. Show how their success is equal to yours. Hiring boils down to finding candidates who can drive measurable business results. Don't rely solely on your skills and experience. Outline how you can deliver tangible benefits to the employer. Quantify the value you've brought to previous employers. If you're applying for a sales role, share data on the year-over-year revenue growth, client retention rates, and customer satisfaction scores you achieved in your previous positions. Quantify the value you brought to the organization, then explain how you can replicate or exceed that level of performance in the new role. Say you're interviewing for an IT support position. In addition to highlighting your technical expertise, again using a STAR story, highlight your expertise in streamlining processes, reducing downtime, and providing exceptional customer service. Tie those accomplishments back to the employer's need to maximize productivity and minimize disruptions. The key is to make a compelling case that the employer also succeeds when you succeed. It's understandable to feel frustrated by rejection, but the most successful candidates recognize that employers have legitimate business priorities. Identifying an employer's interests and showing how you can support them will improve your chances of landing a job. Stop expecting an employer to save you. Save an employer. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com