My Christmas Wish List

By Lisa Robinson To The Honourable Doug Ford Premier of Ontario Room 281, Legislative Building, Queen’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A1 Premier@ontario.ca Subject: Protecting Democracy and Safeguarding the Voice of the People File: A1400 - 001 Dear Premier Ford, I am writing to you with deep concern regarding the most recent announcement to amend the Municipal Act. This proposal poses a serious threat to the democratic principles that underpin our nation and erodes the fundamental rights of Canadians to choose the elected officials who represent their voices. The introduction of such sweeping changes must be reconsidered, as it leaves the door wide open for abuse of power, corruption, and collusion among key municipal actors. Allowing council members, mayors, and city-paid Integrity Commissioners to collectively wield the power to remove an elected official sets a dangerous precedent. This approach is ripe for manipulation, retaliation, and political weaponization. It creates an environment where those in positions of influence can conspire to silence dissenting voices, punish political opponents, and skew future election outcomes—in essence, a form of election tampering. The power to elect and remove officials must remain firmly in the hands of the people, not in the hands of those who stand to benefit from their removal. The existing framework already includes mechanisms to address legitimate concerns like harassment, discrimination, or misconduct under workplace and human rights legislation. There is no justifiable reason to grant city councils and Integrity Commissioners the power to overrule the people's choice, especially when existing legal pathways are sufficient to address these issues. The City of Pickering is a stark example of how this system is already being exploited. Council has repeatedly targeted me, Councillor Lisa Robinson, by suspending my pay on three separate occasions—not for misconduct, but for exercising my right to freedom of expression and standing up for the beliefs and priorities of my constituents. My advocacy for transparent governance, my support for the principle that only governmental flags should fly on government buildings, and my call for fair and inclusive access to public restrooms are rooted in the will of the people I represent. Most recently, I face yet another attempt to strip me of three months' pay—my only source of income as a single mother. My so-called "offense" was stating, “If I were to become mayor, I would use strong mayor powers to remove the CAO, city solicitor, and a few directors because corruption starts at the top. I would tear down city hall, build it back up, and give it back to the people.” This is not misconduct—this is political expression. Every elected official should have the right to propose changes, share their vision, and advocate for what they believe is in the best interest of their constituents. Punishing this kind of expression is a gross misuse of power. Meanwhile, there have been far more serious transgressions by other council members that have gone unpunished. One council member has made violent threats towards me, stating they would "stick a knife in [my] back, twist it slowly, and [I] would never know until he was ready to pull it out." The same individual stated they would "sharpen their sword and decapitate the motherf---er" in reference to the mayor. (There is a recording of this comment). I have also endured sexual harassment and psychological harassment. Shockingly, there was no suspension or accountability for these threats or harassment. They were all swept under the carpet. Why? Because of the individual’s status as a senior councillor with close ties to the mayor, CAO, and city Integrity Commissioner. This clear double standard highlights how the proposed changes to the Municipal Act would be weaponized for political gain. The power to remove an elected official should never rest in the hands of council, the mayor, or the bureaucrats employed by the city. It should remain with the people. When municipal actors are permitted to play judge, jury, and executioner, democracy itself is at risk. Why even bother holding elections if those in power can remove their opponents on a whim? This new legislative change would serve as a backdoor to undermine political opposition and ensure only the "preferred" voices remain. I urge every Member of Parliament (MP) and Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) to take a hard look at the implications of this bill. It is not merely an amendment—it is a fundamental attack on the democratic process. When those in power can remove their opposition, they no longer serve the people—they serve only themselves. Minister Calandra, I implore you to reconsider this dangerous course of action. The people's right to choose their representatives is sacred, and any attempt to strip that right away must be met with fierce resistance. We must protect our democracy from corruption, collusion, and authoritarian overreach. If the Municipal Act is to be amended, it should be done to prevent such abuses of power—not to facilitate them. Protecting Democracy and Safeguarding the Voice of the People December 13, 2024 Sincerely, Lisa Robinson City Councillor, Ward 1

Community Newspapers: Connecting and Supporting Local Communities

Community Newspapers: Connecting and Supporting Local Communities By Dale Jodoin Community newspapers are a vital part of neighborhoods and towns, delivering local news to millions of Canadians every week. They serve more than just an informational role; they are key in connecting people, supporting local groups, and fostering collaboration. Across Canada, nearly 14 million copies of community newspapers are distributed weekly, often free of charge, making them an essential resource for many. Community newspapers provide straightforward news, helping readers stay informed about events and issues in their area. They act as a watchdog for local governance, holding politicians accountable by ensuring transparency in reporting. This role is critical to maintaining trust and credibility, as unbiased reporting empowers communities and encourages informed decision-making. However, concerns about political influence over some media outlets have sparked discussions about the importance of journalistic independence. Readers expect community newspapers to provide accurate, impartial news rather than being swayed by political agendas. Independence ensures newspapers can continue their role as a reliable source of truth and a platform for public accountability. Beyond reporting, community newspapers play an essential role in supporting local nonprofit organizations and community groups. These groups often rely on newspapers to raise awareness about their work, promote events, and recruit volunteers. Local food banks, for example, use newspapers to inform the public about distribution times and how to donate. Environmental groups share sustainability tips and event details, while other organizations highlight community resources, such as free educational programs or mental health services. Affordable advertising and feature stories in community newspapers allow nonprofits to reach a wide audience without straining their budgets. Public service announcements and advocacy pieces also provide these groups with a platform to communicate their mission and needs effectively. Community newspapers are a hub for building connections between local groups, businesses, and individuals. They encourage collaboration by sharing success stories of partnerships that benefit the community. For instance, a story about a local grocery store teaming up with a food bank to provide meals for families not only informs the public but also inspires similar initiatives. Additionally, newspapers help bridge gaps between local authorities and residents by sharing essential guidelines and updates. They educate readers about rules, such as food bank eligibility criteria, recycling practices, and safety protocols for community events. This information simplifies processes and ensures that people know how to access the help and resources they need. Community newspapers often serve as a platform for highlighting important local issues. Coverage of topics such as homelessness, public safety, or environmental challenges brings these issues to the forefront, encouraging community involvement. By reporting on these matters, newspapers motivate individuals and groups to take action and seek solutions. For example, stories about cleanup efforts in parks or volunteer recruitment for local shelters show the impact of collective action. These stories also provide recognition to those working tirelessly to improve their communities. Community newspapers are more than just a source of news. They act as a cornerstone for local engagement, bringing people together and supporting those in need. Their commitment to unbiased reporting, community support, and advocacy ensures they remain a valuable resource for towns and neighborhoods across Canada. By connecting people and sharing stories of positive change, community newspapers continue to strengthen the fabric of society, ensuring local voices are heard and local challenges are addressed.

Ward 2 oshawa the forgotten people…

ward 2 oshawa the forgotten people... By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States For those that read my column on a regular basis. will know that I am a believer in the democratic process when it comes to electing government officials. In the same breath. You, also know where I stand with the quality of the candidates that we elect in office. The quality of living in the City of Oshawa keeps getting worst. Taxes keep going up. One would have thought that at the 2022 municipal election the electorate would have voted for change. Almost a reset button on Oshawa’s quality of life. NO - instead the electorate kept all the councillor and the incumbent Mayor and only changed one. I still can’t believe the results and the outcome. To vote back in a Mayor that has turned downtown Oshawa into Durham’s capital for the homeless, drug use, drug trade and prostitution. I am beyond words. Only to strengthen my position on how the electorate votes. Take for example the only change in the municipal roster. Ward 2, City Councillor, Jim Lee. At first I was excited. I thought finally someone with some credentials and a some what proven work history. I had hope for the ward with an under used airport. With a ward that has no representation. At the region, Regional and City councillor Tito-Dante Marimpietri has had numerous terms as the ward 2 rep. How has the ward benefitted? Anyone’s guess. As for Lee. He has shown respect and visited my office once since elected. I appreciated that.... as Tito in his God knows how many terms... maybe visited his local city newspaper once or twice out of the many years he has been elected. Lee, in my opinion. Has become institutionalized. The do nothing and say even less, gets you elected time and time again appears. Lee instead of taking this golden opportunity to make a name for himself. He has opted to cushion his pension and play by the municipal coalitions rules. Say nothing, support what the coalition supports and support corporate prejudice and political vindication against anyone that challenges the status quo at the City of Oshawa offices. If I am wrong. I will be the first to apologize. One question. What has Lee done for ward 2 in his half term. The City position on doing business with the 30 serving newspaper is ignored due to political vendetta. They claim they support local small businesses. We are living proof of their bias, prejudice and lack of support for local small businesses. This is in part why there are so many vacancies in our core. NO SUPPORT. The City of Oshawa is not inclusive but selective.

NEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ON ITS WAY -MERCHANTS CONCERNED OVER LOSS OF PARKING-

NEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ON ITS WAY -MERCHANTS CONCERNED OVER LOSS OF PARKING- By Dean Hickey THE PRINCIPLES WHICH GUIDE the approval of any new development within the city’s downtown core will, by necessity, demand a parallel review of the existing parking capacity upon which so many businesses and residents rely. With the future of Lot 4 now being debated by council, many among the various property owners, merchants, and those who frequent the area will doubtless be concerned as to the potential reduction in the number of available spots. The Economic and Development Services committee decided in early November to declare the surface parking lot at the north side of Athol Street, between Simcoe and Centre Streets, as ‘surplus’ in an effort to engage with those seeking to develop the property into something far beyond its current use. Due to the nature of the process which surrounds such negotiations and decision making, most of what has so-far been discussed has taken place in closed session, and the details have yet to be disclosed. It is known, however, that staff did recommend the approval of a specific proposal having been brought forward as a result of a targeted RFP (Request for Proposals) process, whereby consideration was given to a few select proponents. Committee members took a publicly recorded vote on the matter and, oddly enough, those who were opposed to the staff recommendation were Ward 4 councillors Rick Kerr and Derek Giberson. Both men represent the area that encompasses the downtown, and they are known as having competing visions for the city. Those differences will undoubtedly play a role in their responses to a recent petition that has been submitted to city hall on the issue of parking and the losses that may occur. A group of downtown merchants have signed the petition that reads as follows: “We hereby write, sign, and validate this document as a request…with regards to the acceptance of such project wherein consideration is given to the development of a Parking Lot in the area of Lot 4 in downtown Oshawa. The shortage of parking is NEGATIVELY affecting businesses and is resulting in loss of customers and loss of business revenue. Countless customers have expressed their frustration with the lack of parking, and after circling the downtown area and wasting over fifteen minutes, they give up and go somewhere else. If you want to see businesses grow and thrive in downtown Oshawa, you MUST provide parking. We NEED this parking lot to be built to accommodate customers driving from outside of the area and to generate more productivity in the neighbourhood and provide the potential of expansion for future projects. This is a basic necessity.” One property owner I spoke with, on condition of anonymity for the sake of his tenants, said “Anyone can see we have parking issues downtown. The City doesn’t have the money to do anything about it, so they’re relying on developers.” He went on to add, “Factor in the massive residential developments that are coming downtown and we are severely affected.” He expressed a high level of frustration over the City’s consultation process, telling me it’s quite simply insufficient. “They need better communications people, because we have a manager at city hall who is responsible for downtown business development, and nobody seems to know who she is or what she does.” That’s unfortunate, because the effects of an ever-shrinking supply of parking are being felt directly by those who are trying to make a living in the city’s core, and they need proper representation at the staff level. Supporting a blanket conversion of Lot 4 into other uses may be a recipe for advanced economic decline, if one also takes into account the proposal from the Provincial government for dedicated rapid bus lanes that will consume no less than 125 parking spaces when complete. If that wasn’t bad enough, consider the effect the widening of sidewalks along the north side of King Street has had on the number of spaces available, and the losses continue to mount. This is where the difference in vision between the two Ward 4 councillors may be considered. I was advised by one downtown merchant of a recent survey undertaken by councillor Kerr in an apparent effort to gauge just how troubling the whole parking issue has become. “Rick Kerr is all over this parking thing, and it’s like he’s on a mission” she told me as we discussed her most pressing concerns. Numerous factors have come together in recent years, causing a negative effect on her business. They include open drug use among the homeless, an increase in crime, and of course the slow but steady erosion of accessible parking for customers she says are uncomfortable walking any great distance, particularly as the daylight hours diminish at this time of year. I reached out to councillor Kerr for comment, and he suggested that “Our downtown businesses are stifled now by a lack of parking, for both customers and employees, and I can give you at least three examples. The first is the CIBC building, which has lots of available opportunities for future tenants, however they require reliable, available parking in order to successfully market their office space. Another example is the number of empty store-fronts where businesses have closed or relocated to other areas they see as more accessible. The third component is the lack of development potential for small-footprint buildings that cannot be converted or redeveloped due to their lack of anticipated parking requirements.” While I did not reach out directly to councillor Giberson, his public comments on the issue of mobility within cities, and downtowns in general, has been outwardly focused on the promotion of alternate forms of transportation. In one of his social media posts he offers the following, “It's great to see what Ottawa has been doing in substantially increasing their bike lanes, and they are proof that with time (decade+) and focused will (political, planning & engineering depts, community organizing, financial commitment), you can build up that network and make active transportation and public transportation…a viable alternative to car-centric mobility…” For many elected officials and urban planners, it has become fashionable to cast retailers and others who decry the absence of parking as being somehow biased in their perceptions and without proper appreciation for aspects such as bike lanes, which have certainly been in the news recently. Meanwhile, in the shops and offices downtown, those at ground zero can see for themselves exactly what the absence of a meaningful strategic parking initiative has cost them, and they’re tired of excuses from a bureaucratic and political establishment that lacks the necessary vision.

Canada –an independent nation

Canada –an independent nation by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East With the world in turmoil, Canada embroiled in political fights between the two parties which have traditionally ruled it, and our southern neighbor considering the imposition of a 25% tax on products from Canada under the new Trump administration, it is time to remember a little of our history and learn from our past leaders. Largely unknown and unrecognised by the vast majority of Canadians, the Statute of Westminster Day, celebrated on December 11th is nonetheless an extremelyimportant day in Canada’s history as a nation. The self-governing colonies of the British Empire, which included Canada, were known as the Dominions. Despite their right for self-government, the British parliament had considerable legislative authority over the Dominions. The situation was changed by the Statute of Westminster in 1931, which increased the sovereignty of the Dominions, giving them legal autonomy and making them essentially sovereign nations in their own right. However, at Canada’s request, the British parliament retained the power to amend the constitution of Canada for five more decades after the enactment of the Statute. The anniversary of the Statute of Westminster is celebrated in Canada every year, but it is not a public holiday, which means that government offices, educational establishments, banks, and businesses remain open unless December 11 falls on a weekend. To celebrate the day, the national flag of Canada and the Royal Union Flag, commonly referred to as the Union Jack, are flown side by side on federal buildings and establishments from sunrise to sunset. Please observe that this is the case in your community. In remembering the steps involved in the formation of the Canada of today, July 1, 1867, the day the Confederation of Canada came into being is generally considered the founding date of the country. However, at that rime the country still wasn’t an entirely “autonomous” nation. That came decades later, on December 11, 1931 with the passing of the Statute of Westminster. The British law clarified that Canada and other Commonwealth countries have full legal freedom except in areas where those nations chose to remain subordinate to Britain. That Statute included the Dominion of Canada, the colony of Newfoundland (which would join Canada in 1949), the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State. Having garnered great respect internationally and a strong sense of Canada’s unique nationality as a result of the First World War, Canada signed the Treaty of Versailles ending that war as a separate nation from Britain, though this was not quite the case. During the following years, the government of Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie-King sought the full rights of a sovereign country in creation of laws and foreign policy. The process had begun in the 1920’s when Canada signed a fishing treaty with the U.S without British participation, established an embassy in Washington, and decided not to assist a British occupation force in Turkey without the approval of Canada’s Parliament. However, the seeds for autonomy were sown in 1926 at the Imperial Conference when Britain’s foreign minister, Lord Balfour proposed that the Dominions be granted legislative autonomy. In 1929, Canada’s head of the Department of External Affairs, O.D. Skelton, attended the Conference on the Operation of Dominion Legislation in London. Here the various resolutions proposed in 1926 were firmed up. In 1930 the various governments submitted terms of the future Statute to their Parliaments. Then on the date of December 11, 1931, the Statute was passed into law. While the Dominions accepted all resolutions, only Canada couldn’t determine a process to amend the Constitution. Thus, power to amend Canada’s Constitution remained under British authority until 1982 with the passing of Canada’s Constitution Act. In conclusion, the anniversary of the Statute of Westminster is a key date that celebrates Canada’s legal independence from Britain. This day is important because it marks Canada’s legislative autonomy, allowing it to make its own laws without British approval. The Statute of Westminster was a pivotal step in Canada’s journey towards becoming a fully sovereign nation. Celebrations on this day highlight Canada’s identity and achievements. The statute is celebrated because it acknowledges the hard work and determination of Canadian leaders who fought for the country’s independence. It also serves as a reminder of Canada’s evolution into a nation that stands on its own while still being part of the Commonwealth. Our current leaders need to remember the work of their forefathers who guided Canada’s evolution to becoming an independent nation, They need to learn from our history, and possibly be inspired by the achievements of their predecessors. Instead of bickering in their ivory towers in Ottawa, our leaders should concentrate on developing new and inspiring objectives for Canada as a nation, working to evolve Canada into a leading nation of the world. What do you think?

Royal Canadian Legion Branch 606 Revokes My Invitation to Veterans’ Dinner

By Lisa Robinson Royal Canadian Legion Branch 606 Revokes My Invitation to Veterans’ Dinner—All Because of Rumors Spread by Fellow Council Members! Despite being the only one fighting for freedom and the rights of Pickering residents, I’m being shut out. Is this what our veterans sacrificed for? I am profoundly disappointed by the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 606’s President’s decision to revoke my invitation to the Veterans Dinner—an event that should transcend politics, standing as a tribute to those who sacrificed everything to secure the freedoms we cherish. As someone who has consistently fought for these very freedoms, as my family did, this decision feels like a betrayal, not only to me but to the principles our veterans gave their lives for. Meanwhile, council members who impose authoritarian, communistic controls within Pickering’s council chambers will be attending this event, claiming to honor the same veterans whose values they are systematically dismantling. Under their rule, our community has witnessed an erosion of democracy so severe that it borders on oppression. These council members have stripped residents of their fundamental right to freely voice concerns, requiring a council vote even to speak on certain topics. They have forbidden the public from recording meetings, demanded two-thirds approval for media presence, and reduced our chambers to a stage for their own agenda, silencing all who dare question or hold them accountable with trespass orders. This is only to name a few. Now, in a disturbingly authoritarian move, they are pushing for the right to remove elected officials who don’t align with their views stripping the public of their power to choose their representatives. Not only that, demanding that Councillor not have the right to run in the following election. This is not just an affront to democracy; its election tampering, its tyranny, echoing oppressive regimes that suppress dissent to maintain control. And yet, my Council are the ones still invited to celebrate the freedom our veterans fought for, while I—the only vocal defender of those freedoms—am turned away. I proudly display the Canadian flag in my office, on my lapel, my parking space, on my door as a reminder of the unity and patriotism our veterans stood for. In contrast, some council members promote divisive special interests, choosing ideological symbols like the pride flag over the flag that represents us all and were disgusted when I said the Canadian flag is my pride flag. I fight for every resident of Pickering, without bias or favor, advocating for the basic rights and protections they deserve. My fellow council members have launched baseless attacks, spreading vile rumors to undermine my character and silence my efforts to hold them accountable for the corruption and cronyism I see seeping into City Hall. To the thousands, millions, who have supported me across Pickering, Ontario, Canada, and beyond, I thank you. Your encouragement strengthens my resolve to expose the truth, defend our freedoms, and fight for a government that serves the people, not its own interests. While I am disheartened to be denied the chance to honor our veterans in person, at the dinner, I remain steadfast in my commitment to uphold their legacy. I will not be intimidated by those who wield power to stifle dissent and distort democracy to their own ends. This is not just about one invitation; this is about the fundamental values that our veterans fought and died to protect. I will continue to stand firm, honoring their sacrifice by defending the freedoms they secured and speaking out against those who seek to strip them away. For our veterans, for our community, and for the future of our democracy, I will not be silenced, and I will never give up. See you all on Remembrance Day. Since posting the above on social media…. One of the Legion bartenders Linda Cook who happens to be a City Councillor in Ward 2 has decided to take to social media to spread many more lies about me, so lets delve in. First, she claims that the Legion does not receive government funding. It’s funny though however councillor Cook assisted in obtaining funds for the Legion’s D-Day BBQ approximately $2,000.00 which is the new allocated amount that anyone can be given without having to go to council and be voted on, and the Legion has also been given money for other projects as well. So the truth is, The City of Pickering has provided financial support to the Legion, even though the organization asserts that it operates mainly through membership fees without "government operating grants." This is a matter of semantics, as these funds are indeed public, even if they don’t fit the technical definition of a “grant.” This same Councillor has spread lies, claiming that I waited until two days before Remembrance Day to share my thoughts in an effort to shame the Legion and their decision. For clarity, the Legion’s letter was delivered to my office on October 22 which Councillor Cook claimed, and my Executive Assistant stamped received on it Oct 23rd. Yet this Councillor, who I can’t stress enough that works at the Legion, somehow knew and commented on the timing of my receipt and response, suggesting coordination, collusion, within the Legion. The rumor she’s spreading suggests I saw the letter on October 22, a claim made to paint my intentions as disrespectful. In reality, I waited to speak directly with the President after his vacation, which occurred on November 8, before sharing the letter. This blatant lie joins others from this Councillor, claiming that I’ve taken issue with various other community groups, simply because I’m outspoken in defense of freedom and truth. Spreading lies about attacking DARS, SNIP, the Police, The Black Community and the list goes on, in an attempt to distract how the People of Pickering hard earned tax dollars are being recklessly spent. These ongoing attempts to misrepresent my character only further underline my commitment to giving the people of Pickering and beyond full transparency and genuine service for what’s really happening in our City Hall. For instance, in September I gave a Notice of Motion to play the national anthem before council meetings—a simple act of unity – which has still gone unsupported by fellow council members, this goes along with only flying governmental flags on all governmental buildings with the exclusion of The Poppy Flag and new Veterans Flag. The reluctance to second this motion should be a red flag to residents on Councils lack of patriotism for our National flag and anthem. Nonetheless, as we approach Remembrance Day, I believe our government should be supporting our school age children in honoring our veterans by excusing them from school and paying for their transportation to attend municipal ceremonies. This small gesture is one I would also like to push as it would allow students to learn directly about the sacrifices made for our freedoms. My late uncle, Andrew Irwin (Andy), and I share a profound bond in our dedication to protecting freedom. He fought in WWII aboard the Algonquin at Normandy, earning the Russian Medal of Ushakov and the French Legion of Honour before passing at age 92 on June 1, 2017. His legacy of service inspires me daily to uphold the values he defended, and I will never stop fighting as both a civilian and a politician to uphold your Freedoms. To all veterans and their families: Lest We Forget. Thank you for your service, and may your sacrifices continue to be honored in all we do. I truly Love you all

Stop Asking Your Interviewer Cliché Questions

By Nick Kossovan Most job search advice is cookie-cutter. The advice you're following is almost certainly the same advice other job seekers follow, making you just another candidate following the same script. In today's hyper-competitive job market, standing out is critical, a challenge most job seekers struggle with. Instead of relying on generic questions recommended by self-proclaimed career coaches, which often lead to a forgettable interview, ask unique, thought-provoking questions that'll spark engaging conversations and leave a lasting impression. English philosopher Francis Bacon once said, "A prudent question is one half of wisdom." The questions you ask convey the following: · Your level of interest in the company and the role. · Contributing to your employer's success is essential. · You desire a cultural fit. Here are the top four questions experts recommend candidates ask; hence, they've become cliché questions you should avoid asking: · "What are the key responsibilities of this position?" Most likely, the job description answers this question. Therefore, asking this question indicates you didn't read the job description. If you require clarification, ask, "How many outbound calls will I be required to make daily?" "What will be my monthly revenue target?" · "What does a typical day look like?" Although it's important to understand day-to-day expectations, this question tends to elicit vague responses and rarely leads to a deeper conversation. Don't focus on what your day will look like; instead, focus on being clear on the results you need to deliver. Nobody I know has ever been fired for not following a "typical day." However, I know several people who were fired for failing to meet expectations. Before accepting a job offer, ensure you're capable of meeting the employer's expectations. · "How would you describe the company culture?" Asking this question screams, "I read somewhere to ask this question." There are much better ways to research a company's culture, such as speaking to current and former employees, reading online reviews and news articles. Furthermore, since your interviewer works for the company, they're presumably comfortable with the culture. Do you expect your interviewer to give you the brutal truth? "Be careful of Craig; get on his bad side, and he'll make your life miserable." "Bob is close to retirement. I give him lots of slack, which the rest of the team needs to pick up." Truism: No matter how much due diligence you do, only when you start working for the employer will you experience and, therefore, know their culture firsthand. · "What opportunities are there for professional development?" When asked this question, I immediately think the candidate cares more about gaining than contributing, a showstopper. Managing your career is your responsibility, not your employer's. Cliché questions don't impress hiring managers, nor will they differentiate you from your competition. To transform your interaction with your interviewer from a Q&A session into a dynamic discussion, ask unique, insightful questions. Here are my four go-to questions—I have many more—to accomplish this: · "Describe your management style. How will you manage me?" This question gives your interviewer the opportunity to talk about themselves, which we all love doing. As well, being in sync with my boss is extremely important to me. The management style of who'll be my boss is a determining factor in whether or not I'll accept the job. · "What is the one thing I should never do that'll piss you off and possibly damage our working relationship beyond repair?" This question also allows me to determine whether I and my to-be boss would be in sync. Sometimes I ask, "What are your pet peeves?" · "When I join the team, what would be the most important contribution you'd want to see from me in the first six months?" Setting myself up for failure is the last thing I want. As I mentioned, focus on the results you need to produce and timelines. How realistic are the expectations? It's never about the question; it's about what you want to know. It's important to know whether you'll be able to meet or even exceed your new boss's expectations. · "If I wanted to sell you on an idea or suggestion, what do you need to know?" Years ago, a candidate asked me this question. I was impressed he wasn't looking just to put in time; he was looking for how he could be a contributing employee. Every time I ask this question, it leads to an in-depth discussion. Other questions I've asked: · "What keeps you up at night?" · "If you were to leave this company, who would follow?" · "How do you handle an employee making a mistake?" · "If you were to give a Ted Talk, what topic would you talk about?" · "What are three highly valued skills at [company] that I should master to advance?" · "What are the informal expectations of the role?" · "What is one misconception people have about you [or the company]?" Your questions reveal a great deal about your motivations, drive to make a meaningful impact on the business, and a chance to morph the questioning into a conversation. Cliché questions don't lead to meaningful discussions, whereas unique, thought-provoking questions do and, in turn, make you memorable. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

The Right Choice

By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States It is about time that the people win one. It is no secret that North American style politics is in severe need of repair. No matter where you look. Corruption, collusion prevail. Not to mention wealth. This past week we witness the pushing of a reset button by the people through what we deem to be a democratic process. Democracy much like the many other political systems are in danger of extinction and or severe change. With the recent win by Donald Trump. The world is watching to see him clean out the old and bring in the new. A new system that will punish those that take part in the rat race and reward those that are intellectually capable to work truly in the best interest of those that elected them to office. Kamala, was a poster child for all that is wrong in politics. A person that would tell you anything you wanted to hear. She would promise the world and deliver excuses. The question that will linger in her mind for years to come. ‘I SHOULD HAVE TOLD THEM MY PLAN’. Something that until today no one knows what it was.... all we know is that she wanted to be elected to the highest office on a promise of turning some fictional page. She promised to do what she failed to for the past four years. She vowed to make changes after she got in and failed to do anything while she was in office. Well, the people have spoken and they have turned a page in the right direction. What are we to expect. As promised by Trump. World peace will be re-instated. No more Middle East conflicts. No more Ukraine war. Finally, peace will come to reign in all foreign conflict. Including the mess along the South Pacific rim. A silent cancer that has been beaten back time and time... Alone they are harmless. In unity they may pose a serious threat. The U.S. will soon boom economically. As always Canada will follow. Our Canadian dollar will once again start climbing up. Gas prices will start coming down. Food prices will come down and immigration put under control. No more open taps on immigration. No more wasting taxpayers dollars to subsidize refugees. Canada will soon go through similar political transformation. It is the natural law of Canadian politics. We go red for a while. Then blue and eventually back to red.... What North America needs is a new political system. Hopefully, Trump this time around will rise with the system to implement for generations to come. It is like that saying goes. Time will tell. Let’s hope Trump does not waste this golden opportunity for positive change.

Canada on the Brink? The Rise of "Popi," the Leader Who Refuses to Let Go

Canada on the Brink? The Rise of "Popi," the Leader Who Refuses to Let Go By Dale Jodoin In a chilling turn of events, Canada stands at a precarious crossroads. At the heart of it all is a man known only by his self-given moniker, "Popi," who has led the nation for nine years, clinging to power with an unyielding grip. Once seen as a leader with fresh ideas, he now holds the country captive, insisting that he alone has the vision to guide his “children,” the Canadian people. But as his policies erode the very fabric of Canadian society, many citizens are left wondering if his benevolence is nothing more than a thin veneer masking a dangerous desire for control. A “Father” Who Won't Let Go “Popi” has made it clear he won’t be stepping down anytime soon, ignoring the whispers of a new election and silencing those within his own party who dare suggest it’s time for change. He views himself as a paternal figure to Canada, casting himself as the nation’s “savior” even while dissent grows within his own ranks. Critics say he no longer listens to his advisors, ignoring the pleas of the public as well as the complaints of party officials who beg him to acknowledge the country’s deepening troubles. What began as policies rooted in environmental protection have spiraled into laws that only seem to serve his own interests. Though the nation struggles through a recession, Popi’s rhetoric remains defiant. He insists he has the answers, yet his “solutions” seem designed to bring in waves of new citizens under the guise of “economic stabilization,” despite a lack of resources or job opportunities for those already here. In many ways, he has become his own worst enemy—an unyielding leader convinced that no one else could possibly understand what’s best for Canada. Backed by a Puppet Coalition Partner If there were any hope of moderating Popi’s influence, it was quickly dashed by the unholy alliance he formed with his puppet coalition partner. Once thought to champion the people, this new coalition partner seems more interested in securing his own cushy pension than in addressing the needs of struggling Canadians. Together, they have created a fortress of power that insulates them from criticism, with the coalition providing the support needed for Popi to enforce his will. The coalition partner, once thought of as a champion of working families, now aligns with policies that strip rights from Canadians, seemingly indifferent to the economic and social toll. His motivations remain murky, but some speculate it’s simply for the guaranteed security and financial rewards that come with supporting Popi’s administration. Many fear that this partnership is an attempt to install a political dynasty that values wealth and control over justice and fairness. Martial Law and Surveillance: A Leader Obsessed with Power Rumors swirl that Popi would sooner invoke martial law than hold another election, a move that would officially cement his rule as that of a dictator rather than a leader. Popi’s previous flirtation with martial law left the country uneasy; many are terrified that this time, he’ll use it as a tool to shut down dissent and fortify his hold on power. His government has already introduced sweeping surveillance measures that allow the state to monitor the online activities of Canadians. Ostensibly meant to "combat misinformation," these measures appear more likely to be used to stifle free speech. To add to the public’s concern, a major newspaper and Popi’s coalition partner have backed the idea of martial law, supporting his stance that such measures might be “necessary” to maintain control. “If he’s done it once, he’ll have no problem doing it again,” commented one of his top supporters. “We believe it’s in Canada’s best interest, especially if the situation calls for it before the next election.” This dark alliance fuels fears that Popi has every intention of using martial law to suppress any opposition, claiming it’s for “public safety” while using it to solidify his control. Popi has introduced laws that enable the government to control the internet, filtering out content he deems unsuitable and ensuring Canadians see only the information his administration wants them to see. Critics argue that this is just the beginning; that under Popi’s rule, privacy and freedom of expression are eroding faster than ever. The dark undercurrent of these laws lies in their potential to limit any organized opposition, transforming the internet from a forum for free thought into a tool for state surveillance. The Future of Canada's Economy at Stake Canada’s economy, once vibrant, now struggles under Popi’s iron-fisted approach. He has hinted at plans to centralize financial systems, bringing in an online currency that would be monitored and controlled by the government. This currency, if implemented, would further allow Popi to oversee all transactions within Canada. It’s a dangerous precedent that could strip Canadians of their financial independence, making them beholden to a state that already seems to care more about control than prosperity. This proposed currency would mean that all transactions could be tracked and monitored, offering the government unprecedented access to citizens' finances. Experts warn that under this regime, the middle class would bear the heaviest burden, with taxes funneled toward policies that increasingly benefit a small, privileged group close to Popi. There is growing fear that this move will bring Canada into alignment with a handful of other countries where state-controlled currency has led to poverty and economic ruin for the general populace. Dividing Canadians While Protecting His Inner Circle Many Canadians, especially those in vulnerable economic positions, feel abandoned. Popi’s policies seem crafted to benefit a select minority, leaving the majority to fend for themselves. His inner circle, which reportedly includes figures with vested interests in foreign powers, remains untouched by the harsh economic realities facing everyday Canadians. They continue to flourish while the rest of the country is burdened by skyrocketing costs and dwindling resources. Popi has courted a following among a specific subset of Canadians who cling to his promises, seemingly immune to the hardships his policies create. These individuals have been treated with privileges unavailable to the rest, fueling resentment among those who feel overlooked and forgotten. The stark division between the minority he favors and the majority who suffer has only widened, leaving Canada fractured and in turmoil. A Dangerous Bill Silencing Freedom of Speech Adding to the mounting concerns, Popi’s administration has introduced the Online Harm Bill, a piece of legislation aimed, supposedly, at combating harmful content. But critics warn that its true purpose is far more sinister. This bill would give Popi’s government sweeping powers to silence dissent, with harsh penalties—including jail time—for those who speak out against his policies. The bill is vague enough to justify the imprisonment of anyone whose opinions challenge the official narrative, effectively gagging freedom of speech in Canada. This bill stands to transform the country’s landscape of open discussion and healthy debate into one where fear prevails. Under the pretext of ensuring a “safe and respectful” online space, Popi seeks to dismantle the very foundation of democratic discourse. With this law, he can jail dissenters and further tighten his grip, ensuring that any criticism of his rule is snuffed out before it reaches the public. An Uncertain Future and a Rallying Cry for Freedom As Canada descends further into recession, Popi’s promises to “save” the nation ring hollow to most. His policies have brought the country to the brink of ruin, and his refusal to relinquish power spells a grim future for Canada. With rumors of further restrictions on freedom and wealth redistribution policies that funnel money to his allies, Canadians find themselves grappling with a question: what will it take to reclaim their nation from this self-declared savior? In the streets, a quiet resistance grows, a movement of Canadians who have had enough. These citizens remember a Canada of freedom and fairness, and they yearn to see it return. They warn their fellow countrymen to stay vigilant, to resist the creeping influence of Popi’s government over their lives, their incomes, and their freedoms. For them, this is not merely a political battle—it’s a fight to preserve the Canada they love. As Canadians look to the uncertain horizon, they are reminded of the old adage: power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Popi’s legacy, once one of hope, now casts a long, ominous shadow over the nation. And with each passing day, the call grows louder: Canada must wake up, or risk being lost forever. Fictional or not you decide.

Unlocking Our Northern Resources is Canada’s Future

Unlocking Our Northern Resources is Canada’s Future by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East Our country has the second largest land mass in the world, and it has a treasure trove of Natural Resources that we are not using. The Northern stretches of our country are particularly well endowed, but sadly, they are also particularly ignored. During my tenure in the House of Commons, I always looked for ways to develop the Canadian Arctic both economically and as an essential part of the defence of Canada. Canada's three territories, Nunavut, the Northwest Territories and Yukon - account for nearly 40 percent of the country's land mass and have a coastline that is twice as long as the Atlantic and Pacific coasts combined. However, Northerners number only about 114,000, with many living in the territorial capitals of Iqaluit, Yellowknife and Whitehorse. Indigenous peoples make up 86 percent of the population of Nunavut, 51 percent in the Northwest Territories and 23 percent in Yukon. The North is a place with many settled land claims and boasts a world-class geology. There are many different natural resources in the Arctic region of Canada. The land has gold and other minerals like zinc and copper, as well as diamonds. There are many mines in the Arctic for extracting these minerals and diamonds that provide jobs. Canada is the third largest producer of diamonds in the world. These diamond mines, strategic minerals and large oil and gas reserves could form the basis of a lucrative materials industry. In addition, the rich and unique cultures of our Northern territories could attract visitors from around the world, contributing to a thriving tourism industry. Thus, the North has the potential to become an engine for economic growth for the entire country and a destination for investment. The potential for wealth and job creation through resource development in the North is tremendous. Managed in a sustainable manner, Canada's incredible natural resources, including living marine resources such as fisheries, could contribute to the prosperity of Northerners and all Canadians for generations. These resources have the potential to be a cornerstone for sustained economic activity in the North and throughout Canada. The only problem is that Canadian governments since WW2 have had little interest in developing the country as a whole. They have remained focused on the old established settlements around the three big cities, Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver, and a narrow strip of land North of the US border. There have not been any new ideas, let alone revolutionary ones, for developing the country, cluttering the minds or desks of any politicians in the recent past. They limit themselves in the House of Commons to producing and pursuing imaginary political fights without any substance. Unfortunately, this trend continues in our current times, and shows no signs of abating. It is time to ask our politicians outright, what they are prepared to do today, for developing Canada; to establish new settlements and develop northern resources. Here is where the real future of Canada lies, not in fruitless and imaginary financial manipulations and corporate welfare. The federal government has the opportunity to unlock the North’s enormous potential for the benefit of all Canadians. Let us hope that one day soon they will do just that. The North is often viewed through the lens of its challenges — vast distances, harsh climates, and small populations — but these very factors make the North an exciting opportunity for Canada. As global attention focuses on critical minerals, climate resilience, and the Arctic’s geopolitical significance, the strategic potential of the North has never been clearer. The vastness of the North, while an asset, also poses real challenges. Nearly half of the communities lack year-round road access, leaving them isolated from essential goods and services. As climate change accelerates, northern supply chains are increasingly threatened by shorter winter-road seasons and lower water levels for barging. The impact of these changes has already been felt, with the rising cost of living and lost economic opportunities. Here, then, is the importance of federal investments in the North, rather than in futile and very costly international projects and subsidies. The importance of investing in Canada’s North cannot be overstressed. We need to invest in climate-resilient infrastructure including all-season roads and energy and communications corridors to strengthen the North’s connection to the rest of Canada. We must ensure that Canada’s link to the Arctic remains secure, and we must unlock its economic potential. The North is warming at four times the global average, and the consequences of climate change are already reshaping life there. The North is Canada’s next horizon. Through strategic investments in housing, infrastructure, climate resilience, and critical minerals, the federal government has the opportunity to unlock the North’s enormous potential for the benefit of all Canadians. So how can we alert the Canadian political world to making the development of the North a first priority? What do you think?

$20.28 is slave wages

$20.28 is slave wages Compulsory Certification is the answer By Murray Strong This is Local 27, of the carpenters union in Toronto, wage rates for apprentices. The apprenticeship is divided into 4 sections to complete the 7200 hours. Day 1 your rate is $24.44, plus 10% vacation pay and your benefits. First term $24.44. Second term $29.50. Third term $34.55. Fourth term $41.98. Full rate on completion of apprenticeship, fully trained, is $48.49. 10% vacation pay brings you $4.84 per hour plus the $48.49, to your back account. As you progress through the 4 terms, you get a better vacation each year. As of Sept 25, 2024 the average hourly pay for a carpenter in the Province of Ontario, according to the government, is $20.28. Some will get a bit more some less. It is disgusting how the immigration is being handled for those seeking a life as a tradesperson. As a carpenter in any union, or nonunion worksite, tell me what protection you have in choosing carpentry. 4 years of training, colored certificate to hang on the wall or 30 to 40 years of working in the trade without the schooling. Both options suck! Ask someone who has worked or is working as a carpenter why they will not write the test offered by the government to become a journeyperson. Every answer is the same. “Why should I waste my time to get a piece of paper for my wall. This piece of paper does not protect my profession like a plumber, electrician or hairstylist. Will it give me the same rights as a Canadian? My trade is not compulsory so I have nothing.” You can see the sadness in their eyes when this subject is raised at a work lunch table. All the skilled trades unions for all trades protect their membership. That is their legal mandate if you are a member. They lobby government on the member’s behalf. Who lobbies for nonunion carpenters? The Toronto District School Board has closed the pre apprenticeship course offered through SCAS? So sad to see it end. I will tell a couple of funny stories from my time instructing at “The Fix It Shop”. Jp was the teacher. We had 40 students, 21 years or older, male and female for 18 weeks of training as a carpenter pre apprentice. All hours at this school were deducted from their required 7200 hours. Day one we met the class. JP introduced himself and talked about a few rules. He said we are guests in this school and that we have our own entrance. Everyone work safe. He then told the class our principal Mary had no money so every penny counts. I was standing near JP and watched as he held up a single sheet of toilet paper. I didn’t know what he was doing. He told the students to pinch the center of a single sheet and tear out a small hole. Place a finger through the hole .Some people started to laugh but he stopped then said do not throw away the little piece. You will need something to clean your finger nail. The entire classroom broke out laughing. What an entrance! I asked everyone to stand up. Lift your arms as high as you can. Wiggle your fingers. Keep wiggling them as you look around the room. Do we have 10 each? Let‘s do this at the course ending. What a great experience in my life meeting all these people wanting a career. During this time I went to a supplier of construction hard hats and got an incredible deal for the students. Everyone had a brand new white hat which could be seen from miles away. Brilliant white. We were teaching how to do formwork. I noticed a gas company was building a new gas station just down the street. The men were building forms so I suggested we walk down at lunch and look it over. 40 construction workers in white hats walking down the street. The entire area had security fence completely encircling the worksite. I told the students to spread out so everyone could have a look. Students were pointing and talking between themselves. Suddenly an executive in a power suit walks up to me visibly shaking. Franticly trying to dial her phone. I said these are carpenter apprentices. Whoever she was trying to call, tried to make sense of the problem she was screaming about. Trying to explain the situation to her boss, she dropped her phone in the mud. We returned to class and carried on with the work. Apparently she thought it was a union raid. The workers at the site were nonunion. Frantic calls were made to Local 27 from top Executives of the gas company. Why was the union doing this? Neither side knew what was going on, the Carpenter’s staff kept pleading with the company execs. The carpenters union was not trying to organize their company. When I found out how many people went crazy over this I laughed till it hurt. Thank you Denny Crane

Home Selling Strategies

Home Selling Strategies Real Estate Columnist Whether you put your home on the market in the Summer, Fall, Spring or Winter, there are a few things that you can do that can help your home sell faster and for more money. One of the first things you might consider is de-personalizing the space. When potential buyers walk in, you want them to envision living in the home, making it their own. It is harder for people to do that when the walls are covered with your family photos and pictures of your beloved pets. If you are still living in the home, it might be a good idea to rent a storage locker or container. De- cluttering is helpful as well. It helps the potential buyer get a clear picture of the home, especially if the rooms are on the smaller side. If rooms haven’t been painted in a while, it would be in your best interest to invest some time and money in this. Listings often advertise ‘freshly painted throughout’, it is very appealing to some people. When choosing a paint colour, always stick to neutrals to appeal to the masses as opposed to just a few who may like the distinct colour you chose. Keeping colours light also appeals to most because if they don’t like the colour, there is not as much work to paint it over as there is with darker colours. Rather than putting things in cupboards and closets, clean them out to make them look larger. People will certainly be opening them as storage is important to home buyers. To really make rooms shine, it might be worthwhile to hire a cleaning service to get at every nook and cranny, areas that we often overlook. Odors can really be a turnoff to potential buyers. Make sure that anything that can retain smell has been thoroughly cleaned. Smell is the first thing that is noticed when people walk through the door. When cleaning and pulling things away from walls, it is a good idea to check for any minor repairs that may need to be dealt with. With some things it really doesn’t hurt to replace them with brand new ones if they look worn or dated. Like floor registers, light switches, or cabinet hardware. Paying attention to your front entrance area can pay dividends. Always make sure the entrance is clean, clear of any shoes, coats, or bags. You do not want potential buyers tripping over anything as soon as they walk through the door. Lighting can be very important. If you have dated lighting, it may be a good idea to invest in some newer lighting in strategic areas like the main floor. If you cannot afford to do the whole house or an entire floor, concentrate on the entry, kitchen, and bathroom. Always try to dress up the exterior of the home where you can. Curb appeal will make potential buyers want to tour your home. Staging can play an important role in how a home shows. There are some wonderful staging companies out there that offer different packages from a few items to a whole house. If you opt to do the staging yourself, simply look at some homes for sale and see how they are staging their rooms. You can get some great ideas from what other people are doing and perhaps save yourself a bit of money in the process. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

WHO WILL BE OSHAWA’S NEXT MAYOR?

-A LOOK AT SOME OF THE POTENTIAL CANDIDATES- By Dean Hickey The next municipal election is still two years away, but when it comes to making a bid for the Mayor’s chair, it’s never too early to start speculating on who might seek the top job on council. Rumours abound that current mayor Dan Carter has no intention of seeking re-election in 2026, and this would leave the field wide open for others on council to seek higher office. One need only take a glance at social media to quickly recognize the active campaigning by one or more councillors as they jostle each other over never-ending photo opportunities for every cause imaginable. Below is an alphabetized list of councillors and others who may be seen as most likely to try to fill the void upon Mayor Dan Carter’s retirement. BOB CHAPMAN…. The Ward 3 Regional councillor was first elected in 2010, and aside from a brief absence during a failed campaign for the provincial PC Party in 2018, he has been a member of council ever since. His previous career in law enforcement spanned 30 years, and he remains an honorary colonel of the Ontario Regiment, having also served in the Canadian Armed Forces. His list of committee appointments is extensive and he has certainly taught himself the intricacies of municipal governance, but to what end? At times he seems more intent on continuing his political career as nothing more than a ventriloquists doll perched on mayor Dan Carter’s knee, and the citizens of Oshawa deserve much better. On a personal level, councillor Chapman has been seen by some as having more than once stepped over the line of acceptable behaviour, due to his often abrupt manner when in the council chamber, an attribute that can hardly be seen as mayoral. JOHN GRAY.... Currently the local councillor for Ward 5, John Gray began his political career in 1994 as a rookie councillor who would go on to become mayor from 2003 to 2010, defeated long-time mayor Nancy Diamond. His record as mayor includes the building of the Tribute Centre, Delpark Homes Centre, South Oshawa Community Centre, and of course a major re-build at city hall. Nevertheless, it was the perception of a free-spending mayor that would ultimately be his undoing in the 2010 election that saw John Henry take over the top job. Since returning to council six years ago, John Gray appears to have taken a cautious approach to politics and as such has often been referred to as yesterday’s man. He will need a major rebranding should he wish to capture the hearts and minds of today’s voters for a return to the mayor’s job. JOE INGINO…. A local independent businessman and longtime proprietor of The Central newspaper, Joe Ingino is no stranger to politics, having offered up some heavy criticism against what he sees as a lack of progress in the downtown core and elsewhere. He has invested 30 years of his life writing about municipal politics, and his determination to make Oshawa a better place does not appear to have wavered during that time. He is man with big ideas who speaks his mind, and has certainly seen his share of controversy due to his straight forward approach. He is, nevertheless, determined to stay focused on all that he sees as necessary for the betterment of the community. No-one can deny his is an independent voice that is far removed from the collective that reigns supreme in the corridors of power at city hall. RICK KERR… First elected to council in 2014 and now representing Ward 4 at the Regional Level, Rick Kerr is seen by most of his colleagues as someone who is honest and easy to work with. His first foray into politics saw him campaign in a city-wide election, which is a daunting task for a newcomer. Having retired from a 30-year teaching career, he has taken on the role of councillor with energy and optimism, even as his ward has faced issues of homelessness and drug addiction on downtown streets. His particular contribution to the cultural aspect of the city has included work on local music events and his ongoing attempt to see Oshawa as an arts, culture, and entertainment destination. At the same time, he has garnered a reputation for moving too quickly from one initiative to another, often weekly, in his ambitious attempt to see multiple project through to completion. While no-one can fault his enthusiasm, the problems facing residents in the downtown area are real and persistent, and will require more than arts and entertainment as a solution. TITO-DANTE MARIMPIETRI…. The King of photo-ops, this Ward 2 Regional councillor seems to want to be everywhere at once. Born and raised in Oshawa, he began his political career at the tender age of 24, and by 35 he could boast having chaired several committees, being assigned the role of deputy mayor, and ultimately elected to a Regional seat. He is currently chair of the Economic and Development Services Committee, a demanding role in a time of record investment in new residential and commercial developments. He is not, however, a man without some controversy on council, and this is an aspect of his career that will forever chase him in the form of documents available on the internet. He won his seat by a narrow margin, and is known to harbour a general distrust of those he sees as an impediment to his goals, leading to a weakening of his ability to establish effective working relationships. BRADLEY MARKS…. Being the grandson of Ernest Marks, mayor of Oshawa in 1967, no-one benefits more from a well-respected family name than the City councillor from Ward 3. A lawyer with the firm of Marks & Pellegrino, he carries weight in the council chamber as one who understands all manner of administrative procedures when taking care of the City’s business. He appears to enjoy contributing to the community in many respects, including his involvement in Oshawa youth hockey, baseball, and different charitable institutions such as Durham Outlook for the Needy. He does tend to say little during council debates, and lacks any significant sign of what one might describe as political passion, often being seen as overly concerned with procedure at the expense of vision. The weeks and months ahead will undoubtedly give ample rise to further speculation, more photo-ops, and an unending dialogue on the part of those seeking to become Oshawa’s next mayor. There is more to come on this topic.

The True Bullies of Pickering:

By Lisa Robinson The True Bullies of Pickering: How the Mayor and Council are Abusing Power, Silencing Dissent, and Wasting Your Tax Dollars For over a year now, the mayor and fellow councillor’s of Pickering have relentlessly attacked me—not because I’m failing the people who elected me, but because I refuse to bow down to their political games and pander to their special interest groups. I’ve been sanctioned, stripped of my pay yet again for daring to speak up for the people of Pickering, for exercising my right to free expression under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This latest sanction—another three months without pay—marks a total of six months of financial punishment. This isn’t about accountability; it’s about intimidation. They want me to fall in line, but I refuse. The truth is, they’ve weaponized the Integrity Commissioner as their personal attack dog, pushing a one-sided narrative designed to discredit me. They twist my words, manipulate my actions, and suppress the voices of my constituents. Let me be absolutely clear: There was no legitimate investigation. This is a political hit job—a calculated attempt to silence me, to paint me as the problem, when the real bullies are sitting in council chambers. Think about it: if I didn’t care, don’t you think I’d just shut up and fall in line? Why would I keep working for free while they drag my name through the mud? I have nothing to gain from this fight, but they have everything to lose. I’m standing up for common sense for common people, while they cling to power and their self-serving interests, while catering to developers and special interest groups. The mayor himself has abused his power, using city staff on your dime—paid by Pickering’s taxpayers—to craft his 75 page witch hunt of manufactured complaints against me. And his bias is no longer just behind closed doors. On September 3, he openly stated he is biased towards me and that he doesn’t want to hear anything I have to say. What does that tell you? He is not just dismissing me—he’s also dismissing every voter who believes I have the right to be heard on their behalf. While they’re busy orchestrating this smear campaign, I’m out there doing the job I was elected to do. The day after they voted to strip me of my pay, I was the only member of council to show up at the “Pickering Forward” meeting, an important forum to hear what the people had to say about our city’s future. And where were the rest of them? They didn’t show because they don’t care about what you, the voters, have to say, and it wasn’t a photo opportunity. They’re more interested in silencing dissent and consolidating power than in listening to the people. What kind of leadership sanctions a single mother’s pay, knowing full well I have bills to pay, a mortgage to cover, and a family to support? They don’t care. Just imagine someone taking away your ability to pay for the roof over your head or to feed your family because they don’t like what you have to say. They would rather see me suffer, hoping to break me down so I’ll finally cave to their demands. This is not just an abuse of power; it’s vindictive harassment. They are unfit to lead—not just for their bullying and intimidation, but for their brazen attempt to lobby the Provincial government to change the Municipal Act. They want the power to remove elected officials who disagree with them—an assault on democracy. Worse still, they want to ensure that anyone they oust is banned from running in future elections, silencing the people’s choice even further. Their actions are not just authoritarian; they’re downright dangerous. They don’t want a council of diverse voices; they want an echo chamber where only their views reign supreme. Each of their characters should be seriously questioned, not just for what they’re doing to me, but for what they’re doing to you—the people of Pickering. The draconian measures they are putting in place is to stifle public input and are designed to rig future elections, to ensure only those who agree with their power-hungry agenda get a seat at the table. They don’t care about democracy or free speech—they care about control. And let’s not forget the staggering misuse of taxpayer dollars in this vendetta. Instead of returning my rightful salary—just $15,000+ for three months of lost pay—they’ve decided to burn up to $200,000 of your money fighting me in a judicial review. $200,000 of your hard-earned tax dollars that could be better spent on the community is being flushed down the drain to prop up their lies. And if you think it stops there, think again. When I take them to court again for another judicial review, I bet they’ll be more than willing to waste another $200,000, bringing the total to a disgraceful $400,000 of your hard earned tax payers money just to silence one voice. Do they care? Of course not—it’s not their money. It’s yours. Through all of this, I have never stopped fighting for the people of Pickering. I show up. I listen. I push back against corruption and collusion, even when they come after me with everything they’ve got. The mayor and his council have shown that they are not fit to serve—they are power-hungry, vindictive, and have zero regard for the voices of the people. And let me be clear, this isn’t just happening in Pickering – it’s happening in Municipalities across the Country. So it needs to stop immediately. Personally, I won’t back down. I will continue to stand with you—because that’s what real leadership looks like. Even when they try to silence me, I will not be bullied. The people of Pickering deserve better, and I will fight to give them the representation they elected me for. It’s time to hold these bullies accountable.

Job Search Success Is Not Complicated

By Nick Kossovan Most people over-complicate the process of achieving success. Achieving success is often perceived as a complex puzzle, or according to those who play the 'I'm a victim!' card, only available to those who are supposedly privileged. The fact is there's a simple equation for achieving success, which Zig Ziglar famously encapsulated, "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help other people get what they want." Side note: "all you want" should be interpreted as "all you need." I recommend considering the hiring process from the employer's perspective. By doing so, you'll empathize with employers and understand positioning yourself as a candidate who has the skills, experience, and proven track record of helping employers get what they want is a job search strategy that'll set you apart from your competition, who aren't approaching their job search with an "I want to help employers" mindset as they have the all-too-common "I want!" mindset. Success isn't a complicated journey. With the right mindset, it’s a simple path—help others achieve what they want. However, the mindset I come across most often is the exact opposite; job seekers focused on what they want, as opposed to what employers want, resulting in employers being turned off. Who isn't turned off by someone solely concerned with their needs and wants, who comes across as "predatory"? Most job seekers: "Employers need to understand my issues and needs." Savvy job seekers: "I need to understand the employer's issues and needs." Job seekers who have their thinking clean and show employers how they can help them achieve what they want are few and far between. Being that rare candidate makes you unique and highly valuable, which is a significant competitive advantage. I can guarantee that your interviewer almost never encounters a candidate who projects an "I'm here to help you" aura. When viewed holistically, employers want five things: • be profitable • reduce/control costs • have low employee turnover • optimize employee performance • provide a customer experience that’s evangelized How can you help an employer achieve any of, or a combination of, the above? What's your employee value proposition? For instance, you can never go wrong assuming the employer wants to be profitable; hence, suggesting cost-saving measures or revenue-generating ideas during your interview will demonstrate your desire to help the company get what it wants, which is to be profitable. Imagine yourself as a hiring manager. One of your standard interview questions is: "How will you contribute to the company's success?" or, more directly, "Why should I hire you?" Candidate A: "If hired, I will bring enthusiasm, dedication, and hard work to the team. I am a fast learner and have a strong work ethic. I am also a team player." Candidate B: "I bring over 15 years of technical expertise, problem-solving skills, and a commitment to innovation. As head of Gekko's IT, I led a project to streamline its data analysis processes, increasing efficiency by 20% and reducing employee hours. I achieved this by implementing Cyberdyne Systems' latest data visualization tools and automating repetitive tasks. I plan to bring this kind of efficiency oversight to Soylent Corporation." Which candidate would you lean towards hiring? Candidate A offers nothing more than their unsubstantiated opinions, which, as I've stated in previous columns, employers don't hire; they hire results. Opinions about yourself, which you should rarely give without quantifying, don't help your interviewer envision how you'll help the company get what it wants. On the other hand, candidate B outlined how they can help the company achieve wanting to optimize employee performance and cost savings. Candidate B thinks like an employer and understands employers are a sucker for candidates with a track record of helping employers get what they want. Getting hired doesn't come down to having the shiniest resume, with all the right keywords, being impeccably dressed, having a perfect smile, or sheer luck. Employers hire candidates they feel will get them what they want. Consider all the successes around you and why they exist. • Amazon: Shopping delivered to your door. • Apple iPhone: Handheld communication. • Facebook: Having a voice. Keeping in touch. • Starbucks: Coffee served around an experience. • Taylor Swift: Music young people in angst can relate to. • MasterCard: Easy to use credit. • Zig Ziglar: Motivation and encouragement. The success of the above can be attributed to the fact that they've designed their offering with the end-user in mind, helping people get what they want. • Amazon: Convenience • Apple iPhone: Connectivity • Facebook: Popularity • Starbucks: Self-care • Taylor Swift: Understanding • MasterCard: Lifestyle • Zig Ziglar: Hope All successful businesses are based on selling a product or service that'll help people (read: consumers) get what they want, which is usually intrinsic. A product or service must satisfy a need or want in order to sell. The same applies to job searching. You must fulfill an employer's need or want. Think of employers as the end users of your services; how do you help employers achieve what they want? Are you communicating your how and willingness to help throughout your job search? Showing how you can help employers get what they want is how you achieve job search success. Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Do you want Lies or Truth?

Do you want Lies or Truth? By Patricia Conlin We are living through an unprecedented time in Canada. We are in the middle of one of worst health and financial crisis’s we have ever experienced all while our mainstream media continues to fuel division and fear. But how did we get here and why has the decline been so apparent in the past few years? Those of us with eyes to see watch in shock as Bills get passed in Parliament without any opposition like Bill C-4 which took away parental rights and Bill C-11 which threatens free speech. Bill C-63, takes censorship to a whole new level and could put someone in jail for so called “disinformation” or “misinformation”, aka telling the truth, if passed. Bill C-47 seeks to destroy the natural health products industry with overregulation under the guise of “safety”, and Bill C-293 for so called Pandemic Preparedness that could remove human rights and bodily autonomy. What is going on? Did we wake up in the Twilight Zone? These Bills are all totalitarian and being passed by MPs with little or no opposition. I believe the greatest crisis we face is one of courage. We live in a society where people in positions of authority are afraid or unwilling to speak the truth. Why? Either because they fear the consequences or are benefiting from the lies being told to the masses. But the lies are harming our lives and communities. Why is that our elected officials refuse to speak even basic truths like: · Carbon is not a pollutant so why are we taxing the air we breathe and bankrupting our farmers and food supply? We need to scrap all carbon taxes and not just one. · Children need to learn reading, writing, math and science and not be exposed to pornography and ideologies in schools. We need to end the gender insanity, Critical Race Theory and DEI as they are Marxist ideologies designed to divide people and create confusion and anger. · The Covid jabs are dangerous and harming record numbers of people and need to be withdrawn. · Our healthcare system profits from illness and death. Safe treatments are routinely withheld like during covid when hospitals pushed dangerous drugs like Remdesivir instead of Vitamin D, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. · The Conservatives under Mulroney and Harper signed Canada over to the UN Agenda 2030 which is at this moment being implementing in our local communities. We need to stop funding SDG and withdraw from the Paris Accord. · Globalist companies and NGOs are pushing humanity into a feudalism model with them being the overlords under the guise of climate change. They want us to live in contained 15- minute cities and eat bugs instead of beef if they get their way. We need to promote localism over globalism. · We have a Uniparty in power who are pushing a dangerous proxy war with Russia instead of promoting peaceful negotiations. We need to stop funding the corrupt Zelensky regime and look after our own veterans and homeless instead. I could go on but you get the idea. Since our elected officials refuse to speak the truth, it is up to us WE THE PEOPLE, to do so with courage and peaceful persistence. Many of the harmful policies implemented at a federal level can be repealed with the right leadership-like Bill C-4. This is also true at the provincial and local levels. I stepped into action during Covid when I saw the harm being done. I had already lost my husband to Big Pharma and didn’t want anyone else to be hurt by their lies. I have been a lifelong small business owner and witnessed the destruction of many of our local businesses. The only party that spoke out against the lockdowns and mandates was People’s Party. They are also the only party calling out the fraud behind the Climate Agenda, the harm of unsustainable immigration levels, the grooming of our kids in schools and the danger of war mongering with Russia- a nuclear powerhouse. That is why we need to elect PPC in some ridings to hold the Conservatives accountable since none of the other parties will do that. I believe that the future of our country depends on voting for people who have had the courage to speak the truth despite personal attacks and loss to stop the globalist agenda and restore a healthy, happy and prosperous future in our community and country. Only PPC has done that since it’s inception. Populist parties are winning around the world as they oppose the lies that are being told to impoverish western countries. PPC takes action to build a better Canada whereas the other parties continue to push the lies that are harming us. What Canada needs is seriousness in politics as the issues are too important to ignore any longer. Wars, massive corruption, unsustainable debt loads, a health crisis that impacting both physical and mental health for a growing number of people, drug addiction, crime, illegal and excessive immigration and refugee claim’s overwhelming our essential services, cost of living crisis and more. Isn’t it time to support and vote for brave Patriots speaking the Truth to set Canada Free instead of allowing the Lies of Parliament to destroy our county?

An Opportunity for Pickering: Eight Key Motions to Foster Community Inclusion, Transparency, and Civic Engagement

By Lisa Robinson As a City Councillor, it is both my privilege and responsibility to address the concerns and priorities that the residents of Pickering bring forward. Over the past few months, I have listened carefully to feedback from our community and am now introducing eight motions to our council for debate, all of which aim to foster inclusion, transparency, and better governance in Pickering. Thus far, the only response I’ve received has been from the Mayor, who declined to second any of these motions. Interestingly, he’s not allowed to second motions without abdicating his chair, so it’s not typical for the Mayor to do so. However, he went further, suggesting that I’m in contravention of the code of conduct. I find it puzzling how advocating for residents’ concerns would violate the code. Every other level of government is allowed to discuss these topics, so why is it that Pickering council keeps sanctioning me over and over again for bringing forward the concerns of the people of Pickering? It is becoming increasingly clear that this has little to do with upholding the code of conduct and more to do with silencing the voices of those who disagree with the direction Pickering is heading in. Neutrality in our government should be something everyone supports, as it ensures all are treated equally. If we remain neutral and represent all people fairly, there should be no violation of any code. In fact, this approach would reflect the true spirit of public service—representing all people equally. With a hopeful eye on the November council meeting, I look forward to discussing these motions openly, so that we can enter the new year with fresh perspectives and stronger policies that truly serve our diverse community. 1. Playing the National Anthem Before All Council Meetings This motion seeks to remind us of the unity we share as Canadians. By beginning each council meeting with the National Anthem, we reinforce the idea that our work in these chambers is for the collective good of all, not just a select few. 2. Lowering the Age of a Senior from 65 to 55 Many residents aged 55-64 have expressed a desire to participate in senior-specific programs at our recreation centers. By lowering the age threshold, we will be fostering inclusivity, ensuring that more of our community members have access to these important services and programs that promote health and well-being. The health and well-being of our residents should not be tied to income. Everyone in Pickering deserves equal access to services, regardless of their financial situation. It’s concerning that the city is considering otherwise, and we need to ensure that well-being remains a priority for all, not just for those who can afford it. In the future, I will again be bringing forward the snow removing motion to include all residents and not just seniors with disabilities restricted by their income. 3. Prohibition on Accepting Gifts, Benefits, or Perks from Lobbyists and Special Interest Groups To maintain trust and integrity within our city’s operations, I am proposing a strict policy prohibiting council members and city staff from accepting any gifts or benefits from lobbyists or special interest groups. This will safeguard public trust and ensure that decisions are made based on merit alone, not outside influence. 4. Changing the Executive Meeting Schedule to Promote Public Engagement Currently, our Executive meetings occur during the workday, which limits the participation of residents who cannot attend. By moving these meetings to the evening, we can better accommodate families, small business owners, and working residents, ensuring that public input is more inclusive and robust. 5. Cash Acceptance at Recreation Centers Reintroducing cash payment options at our recreation centers is a matter of fairness. Not everyone has access to debit or credit cards, and we need to ensure that all members of our community, regardless of their financial situation, can access our city’s recreational services. During COVID, cash payments were temporarily removed. Over the past year, I’ve requested that cash be reinstated. Staff agreed to accept cash for transactions up to $50, and I further asked that cash be accepted for any amount for programs and memberships. However, just a couple of weeks ago, a resident informed me that staff were unsure whether they could take cash. I believe this was an error, and this motion clarifies that cash is accepted for any amount to prevent future confusion. 6. Non-Government Flag Raising Public spaces should remain neutral, and as such, this motion calls for limiting flag raisings to only federal, provincial, and municipal flags, with exceptions made for veterans’ flags. This policy will ensure that no one belief or group is elevated above others in our city’s public spaces, promoting true equality and neutrality. 7. Drag Shows and Pride Events While our city values diversity and inclusion, it is important that all events sponsored or hosted by the city are appropriate for all age groups. This motion calls for guidelines to ensure that certain events, such as Drag Queen Storytime, The Christmas Day parade etc. maintain a standard of appropriateness, particularly for minors under 16. 8. Universal Change Rooms The concept of universal change rooms is a growing trend in public spaces, offering inclusivity to all members of the community. However, it’s vital that any change room policies implemented by the city respect both the privacy and safety of all users, especially vulnerable groups like children. I welcome further discussions and suggestions for these motions, with the goal of ensuring that they represent the needs of all of Pickering’s residents. These motions are an important step forward for our community, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to have them debated and hopefully passed by the end of this year, setting us up for a brighter, more inclusive 2025.