Showing posts with label #ingino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #ingino. Show all posts
Saturday, January 18, 2025
How Cybersecurity And Technology Jobs Can Equal Success For An Autistic Individual
How Cybersecurity And Technology Jobs Can Equal Success For An Autistic Individual
by Kadin McElwain:
My father always told me that the technology field is a great career field for autistic individuals to get employment. Of course, I settled with something in the communications field, as I would be doing something I’m passionate about. But recently, it’s come to my attention that technology would be perfect for me, an autistic individual, to find work. So in a society that’s driven by technology, where do autistic individuals come into play? How can an autistic individual’s skills make the technology field a perfect industry to work in? Here are three examples of cybersecurity and technology equaling success for an autistic individual.
Example One: Not Needing To Socialize As Much:
One of the biggest problems for autistic individuals in our society is the lack of social skills that they may have. All individuals, especially those on the spectrum, want friends and companionship. In fact, it’s human nature to want companionship. The problem for autistic individuals is that they may be overwhelmed in social situations and may have a fear of rejection. Therefore, it may be hard for them to be able to make friends, which can impact them on an interprofessional level as well. This can result in a low quality of life as well, in all forms.
This is where a career in technology or cybersecurity comes in. There are a few technology jobs where you have to go into the office to do your work. But you don’t necessarily have to interact with anybody face to face while you do the work unless it’s during an employee break or a major meeting with your boss about a potential promotion. If the technology job is remote, that’s even better for autistic individuals. Not only do they not have to go into the office to do their work, but they’ll also have the ability to do the job in the comfort of their own home. This can ensure that the job is both enjoyable and comfortable for the individual.
Example Two: Routines, Routines, Routines:
If there is one thing that is sacred to an autistic individual, it’s having a proper routine and sticking with it. Whether it’s having the same things in your morning coffee every day, immediately rushing to do your morning chores after said coffee, or listening to the same song every day, having that routine is just as important to an autistic individual as breathing. With a majority of jobs, things can change expeditiously and the routine could be thrown off multiple times. Powerpoint presentations may need to be given on the third Tuesday of every other month, business taxes may need to be filed on Tuesday, yet are due on Wednesday night, and there could even be a major PR crisis that needs to be dealt with before anything else! As a result of the constant change in routine, the autistic individual could feel overwhelmed.
But with a job in the technology field, your routine is mostly the same. You clock in for the day, go to your cubicle to do your work, have lunch, and go home. There may be one or two days out of the month when you do something outside of the routine, such as an employee team-building exercise or a company picnic. But these aren’t stressful routine-altering events but rather enjoyable events that have little to no effect on your work routine. When you have a career in technology, your routine will be the same and you will never have a severe routine-altering event that stresses you out. This makes the field a successful one for autistic individuals to break into and thrive.
Example Three: A Platform To Use Your Heightened Sense Of Concentration:
Autistic individuals have a heightened sense of concentration when it comes to certain tasks and topics that they enjoy. Sometimes, people with autism can spend hours researching a topic they enjoy and spend all night on projects they’re working on for school or work because they are dedicated to the tasks or topics at hand. A huge issue with most industries is that there is no room to concentrate on only one task or topic. Especially in today’s society, you have to know 72 different trades or more to even be considered for an interview. Some of these trades, such as knowing four different languages, knowing how to use seven different platforms, and knowing how to fix a copy machine, can take months, if not years, to fully master. This can disqualify autistic individuals from jobs at best and cause stress while on the job at worst.
With a job in the technology field, you can use your heightened sense of concentration as an autistic individual to focus on completing one task, as opposed to multiple tasks at the same time. The task at hand is simply to make sure all things on the technological side of the business are running as smoothly as possible and to make sure any threats to company security are eliminated. There’s no need to learn over 100 different tasks to get the job or to learn new tasks while on the job that could take months to learn and stress you out. You get to use your heightened sense of concentration exclusively on making sure the network of a company runs smoothly. This can result in an enjoyable experience and success in your career.
To conclude, cybersecurity and the tech field can be great industries for autistic individuals to establish a career for themselves. They don’t have to socialize as much as they have to in other fields, they can have a stable routine, and they can use their heightened sense of concentration to complete the task at hand and make the experience as enjoyable as possible. That’s not to say that autistic individuals aren’t capable of having success in other fields. All individuals are capable of whatever they set their minds to, no matter what they’re going through. However, a career in the technology field can help guarantee the success of an autistic individual in their career.
Durham MP calls for protection of Christians in Canada
Durham MP calls for
protection of Christians in Canada
By Sami Parvez
In May 2024, Jamal Jivani, 37, was elected as the member of Parliament for Durham in a by-election, replacing former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole, who stepped down in August 2023. Jivani has been a vocal for protecting Christians and their rights in Canada.
In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Durham MP Jamal Jivani called on Canadians to sign a petition addressing what he described as government inaction in the face of increasing threats to Christian communities.
In Canada, Christians are facing backlash while the government turns a blind eye. This comes despite more than 19.3 million Canadians identifying as Christian—53 per cent of the population, according to the 2021 census.
"I'm sounding the alarm,” Jivani said in the video posted on X. “We need to do more to protect Christians in Canada,”
The MP’s call comes amidst growing concerns over vandalism and arson targeting churches, as well as debates surrounding religious freedoms and parental rights and growing influence of the LGBTQ2S+ movement.
Jivani criticized the federal government in a video posted on X, for its perceived failure to address these issues, questioning its commitment to safeguarding Christian heritage. He also raised alarm over what he described as a “crime spree” targeting places of worship, emphasizing the need to protect the freedom of expression for Christian churches.
Durham MP expressed concerns in his video about the federal government's failure to defend parental rights and Christian values. He emphasized the need to protect mothers and fathers, conscience rights for workers, and to address crimes targeting churches, such as arson and vandalism.
It is uncommon for a Muslim MP to advocate for the protection of Christianity, as Muslims rarely speak out on behalf of other religious groups, particularly Christians. Some Islamic scholars argue that saying "Merry Christmas" implies endorsing the belief that "God has a son," which conflicts with Islamic teachings. For this reason, they consider it prohibited, as it is seen as celebrating the son of God.
Christianity has been under threat in Canada since Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took office, with the Christmas season increasingly referred to as the holiday season. In 2021, the discovery of unmarked graves at former residential school sites sparked national outrage, leading to more than 100 churches being burned or vandalized.
At the time, Trudeau told media, “I understand the anger that’s out there against the federal government, against institutions like the Catholic Church. It is real and it’s fully understandable, given the shameful history that we are all becoming more and more aware of and engaging ourselves to do better as Canadians.”
In 2009, Durham Region experienced a troubling rise in church vandalism and arson, affecting historic and cherished landmarks. All Saints’ Anglican Church in Whitby, a 144-year-old structure, faced repeated vandalism before being destroyed by a suspicious fire, with damages estimated at $2-3 million. Investigators found a gas canister at the scene. Similarly, St. Philip the Apostle Catholic Church in Oshawa was ravaged by a Christmas Day fire with multiple points of origin, suspected to be motivated by religious bigotry. These attacks left congregations grappling with emotional pain, financial strain, and displacement, highlighting the urgent need for community vigilance.
“Now when you see a Christmas tree like this in Parliament you might think that's a sign of respect for Christians,” Durham MP said in the video. “But what good is a Christmas tree here in Parliament when you have a federal government that will not lift a finger to protect Christians from governments and corporations abusing their power?”
According to the International Prayer Connect (IPC), a global network of over 4,500 Christian prayer and mission networks and organizations, in 2019, Trudeau told Pastor Steve Long, a Canadian Baptist minister, 'Evangelical Christians were the worst part of Canadian society.” The remark continues to fuel distrust among Evangelical groups toward Trudeau's government."
“We have to stop the crime spree targeting churches including arson and vandalism,” Conservative MP added in the video. “And we need to defend the legal status of Christian Charities and the freedom of expression of Christian churches.”
“This is not about forcing other people to live according to Christian values no this is about whether Christians in Canada have the freedom to live according to their own traditions and to practice their own faith without corporations and governments engaging in overreach.”
Durham MP is urging Canadians to take action by signing a petition on one of his sites.
The petition, aimed at protecting Christian rights and heritage, will be presented at an event in Ottawa in February 2025.
“This is not about forcing others to live according to Christian values,” Jivani said in the video. “This is about whether Christians in Canada have the freedom to live according to their own traditions and practice their faith without corporations and governments overreaching.”
Jivani emphasized the need to stop crimes targeting churches and defend the legal status of Christian charities, urging Canadians to stand united in protecting their rights and freedoms.
When Job You Are Being Compared
When Job You Are Being 
Compared
By Nick Kossovan
Job hunting is a 'winner takes all' competition in which you're compared and judged against other applicants. Putting in an application for a job is no different from entering a baking or short story contest. However, there's one difference: there's no second place—silver medal—nor does "everyone wins for doing their best," hence why giving participation trophies does a disservice to children; it fails to prepare them for two universal life truths that they’ll one day confront:
1. Everything in life is earned. (Yes, birthright exceptions exist. Choosing to squander your time and energy, resenting those who're an exception doesn't change this truism.), and
2. Sometimes, your best isn't good enough to beat those you're up against.
Job searching intensifies these truths.
Irrespective of your feelings about the "fairness" of having to do "what it takes," you don't rise through the ranks of whatever career path you've chosen by being meek. Be it corporate, artistic endeavours, athletics or military, without a competitive spirit, you won't have a career comparable to someone who does. Thus, generally (keyword) speaking, CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, higher-ranking military officers, celebrities and elite athletes tend to be hyper-competitive.
I keep the following phrase from American author Ashley Antoinette in my head: "You can't compete where you don't compare."
When entering any competition, for instance, job searching, it's crucial to understand the standards and benchmarks—your ego may insist you have the skills and qualifications, do you?—against which you'll be compared; therefore, consider the following:
· Awareness of standards
Knowing and accepting what employers in your profession and industry will most likely expect from you is critical.
If you're applying for any job requiring strong writing skills (e.g., grant writer, content creator, communications manager), it's a given that your writing skills need to be well above average. When applying for a sales position, your sales record and ability to sell yourself will be evaluated.
Along with industry and profession expectations, employers evaluate applicants based on the expectation of applying professionally.
I repeatedly see sloppy applications and an unprofessional appearance as the biggest hindrance to a successful job search. Even with all the online job search advice, typos, grammatical errors, incomplete LinkedIn profiles, and dressing inappropriately for interviews—dress for the position you're interviewing for—are common. In 2025, there's still a strong conservative element in the workplace, albeit not as strong as before.
· Self-Assessment
You can identify your strengths and weaknesses by honestly comparing yourself to those you're competing against. My advice: To be competitive and considered a contender, focus on your strengths (read: lead with) and be less concerned about your weaknesses.
My "go with your strengths" story:
Years ago, over a Thai lunch, I asked my then-boss how he managed to work so fluidly. He never seemed stressed; it was as if he floated through his workday, accomplishing high-level tasks. His answer: "I work with my strengths. As long as my weaknesses do not hinder me from doing my job, I don't spend time and energy trying to overcome them. I spend my time and energy improving my strengths." The food wasn't memorable, but my then-boss's words were. As a result of ignoring my non-detrimental weaknesses and focusing on my strengths, I've become a stronger competitor and have benefited from it.
· Strategic positioning
Knowing where you stand in relation to your competitors helps you improve your strategy.
The words uttered by another ex-boss during what I think was a friendly dust-up some 20 years ago, "There's always someone younger, more skilled, and hungrier than you," have stayed with me all these years. His words remind me that I must always be at least one step ahead of those nipping at my heels. I've seen many careers implode because the person rested on their laurels.
It's surprising how many people don't try to stay relevant by learning and becoming proficient in the technological advances affecting their profession and industry, AI being the latest.
Demonstrating continuous learning and adaptation is what employers like to see in candidates and their employees.
Always know where your skills and experience stand and what you can offer employers in terms of measurable value. Calling yourself "talent," as many nowadays do without quantifying how your "supposed talent" will make money for an employer, isn't a compelling argument for why an employer should hire you.
I hear from many job seekers experiencing the "Silver Medal Curse," where they land interviews and then hear, "We went with someone else."
Clearly, their resume and LinkedIn profile are competitive, which anyone can achieve with all the resume help available. However, one thing no one can do for you is your interviews, the meetings where the hiring manager assesses your suitability for the position and the company and compares you to the other candidates they're interviewing.
My tip to make your interviewer see you as a contender for the job is to prepare specific examples that showcase your skills and achievements, aligning them with the job requirements. The best strategy for beating your competition is to show employers that you are a winner who has produced measurable value (key) for your previous employers.
_____________________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com
Why Pickering Needs to Rethink Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs: A Call for Common Sense
Why Pickering Needs to Rethink Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Programs:
A Call for Common Sense
By Lisa Robinson
At the May 6th, 2024 Executive Meeting, I stood alone in voting against forcing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs and policies on the City of Pickering. At the time, I cautioned my fellow council members and city staff that DEI was facing bans in some U.S. states due to its divisive nature and inefficiency. Now, just months later, my concerns have proven valid. DEI programs have spiraled into a bureaucratic nightmare—wasting taxpayer dollars, sowing division, and replacing practical governance with ideological agendas.
While I stood firm in opposing these policies, all three of my colleagues present at that meeting were actively pushing to accelerate the implementation of the DEI program. Meanwhile, some of the world’s largest and most successful companies like McDonald’s, Walmart, Boeing, Molson-Coors, Ford, Jack Daniel’s, John Deere, Lowe’s, Harley-Davidson, Meta, and Amazon, are abandoning DEI initiatives. Why? Because these programs don’t work. They create division, invite lawsuits, alienate customers, and fuel tensions among employees. If industry giants with global operations recognize the harm caused by DEI, why is Pickering still embracing it?
The slogan “go woke, go broke” has become more than a catchy phrase—it’s a reality. Time and again, businesses and organizations that prioritize ideological agendas over quality, fairness, and merit end up facing backlash from consumers and stakeholders. Just look at the numerous companies that have lost market share, tarnished their reputations, or faced significant public criticism for going too far with divisive DEI initiatives. DEI is not the cure-all it was once marketed as; instead, it is a framework that too often prioritizes optics over outcomes and division over unity.
In Pickering, we’re already seeing the cracks. DEI policies don’t just fail to address the root causes of inequality—they create new problems. By categorizing people based on their identity rather than their character or qualifications, these programs foster resentment and suspicion. No one should be hired based on the color of their skin, their religious beliefs, or their sexual preferences. When you board a plane or go into surgery, do you want to be wondering if the pilot or surgeon was hired because of DEI quotas, or because they were the best person for the job? Competence and merit should always come first.
These policies also breed inefficiency. The introduction of costly DEI officers, training sessions, and consultants eats away at our city budget, diverting funds that could be spent on tangible improvements for our residents. Do we want a city that prioritizes ideological box-checking over fixing our roads, supporting small businesses, and investing in public safety? Residents are already stretched thin by rising costs of living. They deserve to see their hard-earned tax dollars go toward initiatives that make Pickering a better, safer, and more prosperous place—not divisive policies that sow confusion and mistrust.
Let’s be clear not to twist my words. I’m not advocating for the exclusion of anyone. What I’m saying is that we should be focusing on unity and inclusion through fairness and common sense—not through bureaucratic, expensive programs that polarize our community. A city should serve its residents by providing effective services and fostering real opportunities for everyone, not by lecturing and training them on identity politics.
Following our January 27th virtual council meeting, I will give notice of a notice of motion to halt DEI programs and policies in Pickering and block using your tax dollars to hire a nearly One Hundred Thousand Dollar a year DEI officer. It’s time we prioritize fiscal responsibility and practical governance over ideological fads. The divisive nature of DEI is clear, and the evidence from the corporate world shows us that it doesn’t lead to success—it leads to failure.
Time to focus on real issues like homelessness, rebuilding infrastructure, fostering economic growth, lowering property taxes, the reckless spending of your tax dollars, and ensuring the safety of our neighborhoods, to name a few. These are the issues that matter to Pickering residents, not divisive and expensive programs that pit people against one another.
Time to learn from the mistakes of others. The corporate world is moving away from DEI because it has proven to be a failure. It’s time for Pickering to follow suit and focus on what truly matters. The people of Pickering. By redirecting our resources and efforts, we can build a city that works for everyone—not just those pushing ideological agendas.
I encourage you to review the May 6th meeting on Youtube yourself to see where I stood on this issue. The link is provided for full transparency.
I am Lisa Robinson, the People’s Councillor, and I remain committed to advocating for policies and change that serve our city and its people—not empty agendas that divide and control us. Time to rebuild trust in our community.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iokQOZP4ezs
LET’S GET REAL HERE
LET’S GET REAL HERE
By Joe Ingino
B.A. Psychology
Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers
ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000
Published Columns in Canada and The United States
People wake up. Let’s get real here. Many of you have issues with the 911 service. Some complain that they do not respond to calls quick enough. Imagine services not showing up at all...
The civility of a society is dependent on the front line police officers that keep the peace and persecute criminals in order to keep us safe. Sure we have had our share of rouge officers. But that is why the captains and sergeant are there for. To keep them in line.
Today it appears that policing has become another institution constantly beckoning for increased budgets so that the top bras can play executive while tightening the grip on the under rank with policy and boards that restrict the ability to do their jobs.
Lowering standards in recruits ads to the topology of a police being able to do his job. This Friday, the newswire lit up with “Highway 401 wrong-way chase results in criminal charges for two Durham police officers. The charges come after a complex investigation by the civilian watchdog into the actions of the Durham regional police officers.”
Now let’s look at this from a reality perspective. Our police officers are not super heroes. They are human beings faced with the responsibility to show up at work every day not really knowing if they will make it back home alive. The level of stress for the average police officer is extremely high. Not only are they faced with having to deal with the reality of the particular situation they are called upon to respond. They also have to deal with the circumstance, the content and context as per law. This means that they are putting their lives at risk due to policy and law.
The incidents that took place on the 401 were tragic. A perpetrator driving on the opposite side of the highway at high speed. To end in the loss of life. Horrible situation. Subsequently the officer in pursuit not only risked his life in the chase that served two purposes.
One, it alerted the on coming traffic of the situation. Something that the on coming traffic should automatically slowed down and pulled over. Something that does not happen on the 401. Drivers see a dangerous situation and fail to slow down or even stop. So it is easy to put the blame on the officer without acknowledging the risk he took.
Secondly, these officers that continued the pursuit not only risk their lives but in a way prevented from many others to be lost.
Then why are these two officer facing: each with three counts of criminal negligence causing death, and two counts of criminal negligence causing bodily harm.
If I was a police officer I would go on strike. This independent body went on a witch hunt that is sending the wrong message to the morale of the front line officers. The DRPS board, executives need to cut the red tape, the paper work. They need to disband the level of bureaucracy and filter responsibility through the ranks. Criminally charing officers for doing their job is wrong. Officers caught abusing their stature must be disciplines. Officers risking their lives to prevent further loss should not have their lives ruined with criminal charges. Think about it. You are sitting in a police car. The call comes through. Are you going to attend rapidly and risk your life and the livelyhood of your family. Justice is about interpretation not a tool to restrict duty to society and country. What next. We are going to charge every military service person with murder for killing during war?
Ontario's Solar Panel Promise: Why Did It Lose Its Shine?
Ontario's Solar Panel Promise: Why Did It Lose Its Shine?
By Dale Jodoin
Once upon a time, Ontario promised a greener future. The government introduced the Feed-In Tariff (FIT) and microFIT programs, which encouraged homeowners and businesses to install solar panels on their rooftops. The dream was simple: generate clean energy, reduce dependency on oil, and earn money by feeding electricity back into the grid. But today, many feel betrayed. What went wrong?
A Promising Start
In the early days, the Ontario government offered significant financial incentives for those who participated. Homeowners could earn as much as 80.2 cents per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated. For many, this was a no-brainer. Solar panels became a symbol of hope—a chance for individuals to fight climate change while earning extra income.
However, as years went by, the shine of this promise dulled. By 2017, the payments had been slashed to as low as 19.2 cents per kilowatt-hour. The program itself was discontinued, leaving thousands who invested in solar panels wondering why the government had changed course.
Broken Promises and Angry Homeowners
For people like Sarah Clarke of Oshawa, the program was more than just an investment; it was a commitment to a greener future. "I believed in it," she said. "I wanted to do my part, but now I’m stuck with a leaky roof from the solar panels, and there’s no help to fix it.
Sarah isn’t alone. Many homeowners who took part in the program now face expensive repairs. Solar panels can cause roofing issues, and without the financial benefits initially promised, homeowners feel abandoned. "We trusted the government," Sarah said. "Now they’ve moved on, and we’re left with the mess."
Cheaper Panels, Higher Costs
The solar panel industry has also changed dramatically. Panels manufactured in China have made solar installations more affordable, but there’s a catch. The Canadian government has imposed tariffs on some imported goods, including solar panels, which could drive up prices. Critics argue this will increase costs for those who want to install panels in the future.
"If the government wants us to go green, why are they making it harder and more expensive?" asked Sarah. "They talk about green energy all the time, but where’s the support for people like us who took the leap years ago?"
The Shift Away from Rooftop Solar
The Ontario government has shifted its focus to other green energy initiatives, such as large-scale solar farms and energy efficiency programs. While these efforts aim to address climate change on a broader scale, they leave individual homeowners feeling left out.
"The FIT program made us feel like we were part of the solution," Sarah said. "Now, we’re just ignored."
The Bigger Picture
Ontario’s shift reflects a broader trend in green energy policy. Governments are moving away from small-scale initiatives in favor of larger projects that are easier to manage and more cost-effective. But for people like Sarah, this shift feels like a betrayal.
"We did what they asked us to do," she said. "We believed in the green dream. But now they’ve taken it away and left us with nothing."
What’s Next for Solar in Ontario?
The rising cost of solar panels, combined with the lack of support for homeowners, has left many wondering if the promise of green energy was ever genuine. Critics argue the government has talked a good game about climate change but failed to deliver meaningful support for individuals who want to make a difference.
"The government loves to talk about green energy," Sarah said. "But it feels like it’s all talk. Where’s the action? Where’s the help for people like me?"
The dream of a solar-powered Ontario hasn’t disappeared, but for many, it feels out of reach. Homeowners who embraced the government’s vision of rooftop solar feel abandoned, stuck with costly repairs and dwindling financial benefits.
If Ontario is serious about green energy, it must do more than talk. It must listen to people like Sarah Clarke and provide the support they need—not just for the future, but for the promises made in the past. Until then, the shine of Ontario’s solar promise will remain dimmed.
Canada’s Military Decline
Canada’s Military Decline
by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC,
FEC, CET, P. Eng.
Former Member of Parliament
Pickering-Scarborough East
We are now a few days from the inauguration of the second Trump presidency in the United States and Canada will probably be affected by it in a not very positive way due to the threat of the 25% tariff and a neglect on the part of Canada to secure its borders. We are also in the process of a liberal party leadership contest, which will end with a new Canadian Prime Minister albeit for a short period before a general election.
Most of the issues that Canada has in the new geopolitical context is due to the neglect of its manufacturing industry, scientific innovations and a total disregard for strengthening the capacity of its border controls, especially in the Arctic. To defend the borders and the Arctic you need a flexible organization ready to deploy on short notice and capable of responding decisively to any threat to our suzerainty.
This organization is the Armed Forces, which has been neglected for decades now in Canada, by politicians of all stripes. Well, our neighbor south of the border no longer wants to pay for the defence of Canada and justly asks us for the contribution due for Canada’s defence.
Therefore, our politicians will need to move fast, taking responsible and effective action. Lip service will no longer suffice.
The current situation of our Armed Forces, as I have repeatedly said, is deplorable, and the politicians of this country will be forced to deal with it soon, like it or not.
Despite commitments to NATO and promises of increased defence spending, Canada remains far below the alliance’s 2% GDP benchmark, leaving its Armed Forces underfunded and ill-equipped. Strategic regions like the Arctic are increasingly vulnerable to threats from Russia and China due to unfulfilled modernization plans.
A mix of lofty rhetoric and lackluster follow-through has marked the last Liberal Government in particular. This was very evident in the realm of national defence and security. When it comes to protecting Canada’s strategic interests, the Liberal government under Trudeau’s leadership has proven to be among the weakest of any modern Prime Minister.
However, there is no excuse for the previous Conservative government either, which vacillated to approve, when it had the tools, the acquisition of the F35s ten years ago. That was a clear sign of the continued neglect of the needs of the Armed Forces.
The inability of several governments in succession, to replace aging equipment, from fighter jets to naval vessels, and modern land fighting vehicles has left the Canadian Armed Forces struggling to fulfill even its most basic responsibilities.
For a country with vast territorial waters, an increasingly contested Arctic, and a close partnership with the United States, this neglect is indefensible.
The Arctic, in particular, stands as a glaring symbol of the Trudeau Liberal government’s shortcomings, when he had the opportunity to correct the unfulfilled promises of the previous Conservative government. The region is critical to Canada’s sovereignty and security, yet the government has done little to assert control over this strategically vital area. As Russia and China ramp up their presence in the Arctic, Canada’s capabilities remain woefully inadequate.
Promises of bolstered Arctic patrols and modernized icebreakers have largely gone unfulfilled, as well as building a deep port in the Arctic, leaving Canada vulnerable in a region that is rapidly becoming a focal point of great-power competition. If sovereignty is defined by the ability to project power and influence within one’s own borders, then Canada has fallen short especially under the Trudeau government.
Equally troubling is the state of Canada’s broader strategic posture. Trudeau’s government has often appeared more concerned with projecting an image of Canada as a moral beacon than with addressing hard security realities. This has led to a pattern of overpromising and under delivering.
While Trudeau’s government released a defense policy in 2017 that committed to “Strong, Secure, Engaged,” the actual implementation of this strategy has been halting at best. The policy called for significant investments in personnel, equipment, and capabilities, yet the funding and political will to follow through have been sorely lacking. The result is a Canadian military that is overstretched, under-resourced, and increasingly irrelevant on the global stage.
The most damning critique of Trudeau’s approach to national security lies in his failure to understand that defense and sovereignty are not optional luxuries but core responsibilities of the state. This misunderstanding is evident in the government’s repeated delays and mismanagement of defence procurement projects. From the botched effort to replace the CF-18 fighter jets to the prolonged and still-unresolved plans for new naval vessels, Trudeau’s government has shown a stunning lack of urgency.
These delays not only weaken Canada’s military capabilities but also signal to allies and adversaries alike that Canada is not serious about its defence commitments.
At a time when the alliance is facing renewed threats from Russia and an increasingly assertive China, Canada’s underperformance is more than an embarrassment; it is a liability. The same can be said for Canada’s defence relationship with the United States. As Washington grows increasingly focused on great-power competition, Canada risks being seen as a weak link in the North American defence partnership.
In assessing Trudeau’s legacy, it is tempting to focus on his strengths as a communicator and his ability to project Canada as a progressive, outward-looking nation. Yet these qualities cannot obscure the reality that his record on national defence and security has been deeply flawed. For all his talk of Canada’s role as a global leader, Trudeau has neglected the fundamental building blocks of sovereignty and security. His tenure has left Canada less prepared, less capable, and less credible in a world that is growing more dangerous by the day.
Justin Trudeau’s time as Prime Minister will likely be remembered for many things, but his handling of national defence and security will not be among his proudest achievements.
While he has occasionally articulated a compelling vision for Canada’s place in the world, his government has consistently failed to back that vision with the necessary resources and resolve.
In this sense, Trudeau has not only failed to deliver on his promises but also failed the fundamental test of leadership: the ability to protect and advance the national interest.
Let us hope that the next liberal leader and incoming Prime Minister will have some new ideas for protecting and making Canada proud again.
The future-in-the-making will soon be revealed.
Saturday, January 11, 2025
The Home Inspection
2025 Job Market: What Is Not Changing
-18 my heart aches
The End of the Second Trudeau Era
Outbreak of Respiratory Illness in China: What You Need to Know
Monday, January 6, 2025
First time home buyers
First time home 
buyers
By Theresa Grant - Real Estate Columnist
Ah, the first-time home buyer. A special breed. Joyful, optimistic, eager yet hesitant at the same time. Given the price of real estate these days, first time home buyers come in all different age ranges. Years ago, your typical first timer would be in their late twenties to mid thirties. Now it’s not uncommon to find first timers in their forties and fifties. There is also a situation that qualifies some as first-time home buyers even if they have owned a home previously. If you have owned a home previously but have not owned a home in the last five years, you qualify as a first-time home buyer. Younger first timers need a little more guidance than their older counterparts to know the right questions to ask and what should be top concerns when walking through a potential contender for their first home purchase. That may be simply that older home buyers may have lived in newer and older houses and know what they may contend with a homeowner. We think back to the houses we grew up in and remember certain characteristics of that house and can compare and ask questions based on that. Some however, grew up in apartments and that gives them a different set of questions and concerns. It is always recommended regardless of how many times you’ve purchased a home that you have a home inspection from a qualified home inspector. That can provide you with peace of mind when it comes to anything that may be hidden from plain view. Problems with moisture or foundation are good examples of something that may be hidden or somewhat hidden for the average person just taking a walk through the property. Some things that a first-time home buyer may overlook can seem common and others may wonder how that could not be addressed or overlooked however, when you are out looking at homes certain things can just escape you. This can be due to excitement or being completely enamoured with a property. I find that some of my first time homebuyers will get into a property and be completely taken aback at the fact that they have qualified for such a nice place and may overlook some pretty important facts. On the whole, house hunting can be somewhat overwhelming, and it doesn’t hurt to bring a detached person with you to point out things that you may be overlooking or that simply didn’t occur to you. I remember going through a property with home buyers and the houses were so close together there was really no where to put the snow. When I asked the potential home buyer where they would put the snow, they responded with shock and dismay because it was mid June with no though to where one might put the shovelled snow. First time homebuyers are gearing up for a busy 2025 and will make up a huge percentage of home buyers next year. With this in mind, if you are planning on buying a home next year as rates are expected to continue to drop, it may be a good idea to have a list of questions with you. As well, make a list of things that are important to you like electrical outlets in certain rooms so you can remember to check them.
A friend, parent or sibling is always a welcome additionon tours and can prove very beneficial. How ever you want to approach it, a little preparation can go a long way in the house hunt.
Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com
Opinion: The Mayor’s Fear-Mongering and Lies Have Gone Too Far
Opinion:
The Mayor’s
Fear-Mongering and Lies Have Gone Too Far
By Lisa Robinson
The propaganda machine at the City of Pickering is in overdrive, spinning a narrative of fear and intimidation to justify their increasingly authoritarian decisions. The recent video released by the Mayor and the corporation of the city is not only laughable but deeply insulting to anyone with a shred of critical thinking skills. Let’s dissect this farce for what it is: a blatant attempt to silence dissent, consolidate power, and rig the democratic process.
First, let’s address the Mayor’s glaring inability to keep his story straight. In a statement to Global News, he admitted that the city planned to move to virtual meetings for a year starting this summer due to council chamber renovations. Yet, in the same breath, the city releases a propaganda video claiming the shift to virtual meetings is necessary because of threats and fear for safety. Which is it, Mr. Mayor? If the chambers were under renovation all along, why weaponize the narrative of fear to justify this move? The contradiction is glaring, and the manipulation is appalling.
Now, let’s tackle the absurdity of the fear narrative itself. If the Mayor and council were genuinely terrified for their safety, would they bring their wives, children, and even the Mayor’s 8-year-old granddaughter to council meetings? Let’s not forget their enthusiastic attendance at public events, store openings, and photo ops – all without a police presence. It’s clear they don’t believe their own fabricated story. This is nothing more than a cheap ploy to garner sympathy and support for their oppressive agenda.
And that agenda? It’s as transparent as it is dangerous. Pickering’s council has been tirelessly lobbying Premier Ford and Minister Calandra to amend the Municipal Act, giving them the power to remove an elected official and bar them from running in subsequent elections. Let’s call this what it is: election tampering. It’s an attempt to eliminate political opponents and rig the democratic process to maintain their grip on power. This is not governance; this is authoritarianism dressed up in the guise of public safety.
Adding insult to injury, when I brought forward a notice of motion to move our 2 PM executive meetings to 7 PM to promote public engagement, the Mayor shut it down, saying he’d rather have all meetings during the day. Public transparency? Not on this council’s watch. The Mayor himself has been caught watching Monday night sports during council sessions, demonstrating just how seriously he takes his responsibilities. It’s no wonder he’s pushing for online meetings – they offer a convenient way to mute dissent, turn off mics, and avoid accountability.
The hypocrisy here is staggering. While pretending to care about public safety, this council is actively perpetuating a toxic environment of fear and intimidation. They’ve sent trespass notices to grandmothers, stationed 14 police officers at meetings with low attendance, and painted critics as dangerous threats. It’s the classic “boy who cried wolf” fable, only now it’s taxpayers who foot the bill for this sham. Meanwhile, actual crimes in Pickering go unattended as police are diverted to guard council chambers against nonexistent dangers.
Finally, let’s not overlook the timing of this shift to virtual meetings. Conveniently, the Mayor is now off on a month-long vacation. What better time to avoid scrutiny and public engagement than when you’re sipping cocktails in some far-off destination? It’s a disgraceful display of arrogance and contempt for the people of Pickering.
The people deserve better than this circus of lies, fear-mongering, and self-serving manipulation. It’s time for accountability. The Mayor and council must be held responsible for their blatant disregard for democracy, their misuse of public resources, and their shameless attempts to silence those who dare to speak out. Pickering, you deserve leaders who fight for you, not against you.
I’m Councillor Lisa Robinson, and I will not be silenced.
Jobseekers Need to Learn to ‘Move On’
Jobseekers Need to Learn
to ‘Move On’
By Nick Kossovan
Everyone knows ghosting and rejection are inherent parts of job searching. Yet, job seekers waste vast amounts of energy and time lamenting what they can't control. There's a prevalent sense of entitlement that employers owe job seekers, which goes against the universal truth that nobody is owed anything, be it a job, to make a living or even happiness.
Job searching, regardless of the economic climate, has always required resilience. The key to resilience is having realistic expectations, such as understanding that employers you don't work for don't owe you anything. Having a 'F*ck it!' mindset that empowers you to move on quickly, so you find sooner rather than later that employer who 'gets you' and is willing to hire you is how you foster resilience.
· Ghosted: You didn't get the job. Move on.
· You didn't hear from an employer after submitting your resume: There were candidates with more relevant experience and were a better cultural fit. Move on
· When a networking reach out attempt fails: A stranger isn't willing to drop everything to help you. Move on.
· Not taking down a job posting: Some people never take down their Christmas decorations. If a job can be left open for a significant amount of time, assume it isn't critical. Do you want a non-critical or non-essential job? Move on.
Wishing how hiring should be won't get you a job.
Getting frustrated and angry at how an employer designed their hiring process won't get you a job.
Getting upset over being ghosted—it wasn't the employer who ghosted you; it was an employee whose behaviour doesn't speak for an entire company who ghosted you—won't get you a job.
Life is too short to spend time and energy dwelling on "what could have been" and "whys." This is especially true regarding things out of your control, such as how an employer designs their hiring process or runs their business. The most common false belief I repeatedly see people hold, and which causes much of their frustrations and anger, is that they can change other people's behaviour—as if it's their place to do so.
While it's natural to feel disheartened, it's crucial to understand that wallowing in the many disappointments you'll experience throughout your job search and believing you can control other people's behaviour hinders your progress.
When you invest your heart and soul into an application only to be met with silence or rejection, it's easy to spiral into self-doubt. Consider why you're giving a hiring manager—a stranger—influence over your self-esteem. Hence why I recommend embracing a 'F*ck it!' mindset as a defence against rejection eroding your confidence.
I've been rejected many times more than I've been accepted. I've learned the hard way, a running theme throughout my life, that if I permit it to do so, repeated rejection triggers a cycle of negative thinking that paralyzes me, regardless of whether I'm searching for work, submitting my writing, or reaching out to someone hoping to form a relationship. Dwelling on past disappointments sabotages future opportunities.
There are many reasons why quickly moving on, as opposed to wallowing, playing the "I'm a victim!" card, getting angry, or venting on LinkedIn and other social media platforms—which is never a good look—benefits your job search.
1. There's no shortage of opportunities.
In several previous columns, I've mentioned that opportunities are all around you, with one caveat: they're attached to people. In 2024, employers are turning to their employees for referrals since job postings result in avalanches of applications, predominantly from job seekers who spray and pray. This underscores the importance of networking rather than applying to online job listings.
Clinging to rejections, being ghosted, or whatever is frustrating you is wasting mental energy you could be using to speak to people who may be able to refer you to job openings where they work. Starting right now, shift your focus away from past disappointments—forget about them, what's done is done, you can't change the past—and focus on future possibilities aligned with your skills and aspirations and start making it a point to meet people, because you never know what opportunities they may be attached to.
2. Much of the hiring process is out of your control.
In the same way that you can't control the behaviour of others, you can't control how an employer hires. Many factors influence hiring decisions, notably internal politics and team dynamics. Instead of internalizing these setbacks, remind yourself of your skills, experiences, and past achievements.
3. Not quickly moving on is counterproductive.
Dwelling on why you were ghosted or didn't get the job—instances in which you'll never know the actual reason—drains your energy, energy better spent on proactive measures to enhance your candidacy for future roles.
The key to a successful job search is to keep moving forward and stay focused on what you can control, such as optimizing your LinkedIn profile—arguably the most critical tool in a job seeker's arsenal—resume and expanding your network to take advantage of all the opportunities around you.
_____________________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com
The video
the video
By Joe Ingino
B.A. Psychology
Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers
ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000
Published Columns in Canada and The United States
By now you have read or seen it in the media. City of Pickering Mayor, released a video attempting to justify cutting access to the public by claiming that some un-recognized, alt-right group is creating an environment of danger to council members and staff.
That this same group has cause havoc during public open meetings and brought about a sense of hostility to the municipal meetings protocols. This causing a sense of fear among council and staff. On the surface, you have to take it at face value that if this is true. It is awful. How can any group bring forth such chaos.
By watching this video. It becomes obvious that the video is not about some alt-right movement. But instead it is frame after frame attempt to discredit a fellow council member. The barrage of clips denouncing the actions of one council member in my opinion are not grounds to make such claims as that the city is under siege and that there is any danger over the horizon. The video is nothing short of an attempt to mislead the public and create a sense of fear mongering. Just about every municipality across the Region get their share of upset callers, at times with a threatening over tone. Are we to shut down all access to government?
The video also attempts to create a sense of fear mongering and false assumptions that Pickering has been selected by this un-disclosed or identified alt-right movement the Mayor so seems to fear.
If such fear is real. Why have not one police report been filed?
In reality after following City of Pickering council for the past two years. All, I noticed is that the people of Pickering demand answers and every time they are faced with hostility from the City. Including the mayor that now is crying wolf. This is wrong. The City prides itself on being inclusive, diverse and promote equality.
When by their actions they are exclusive, selective and dispense their version of equality based on how the City will benefit politically. I have been a municipal critic for the past 30 years. This video is a real poor example of the Mayor attempting to create fear where there is none. He is the instigator. He is the one that shuts people down during public meeting and subsequently people react. So he has taken the practice... OF SHUT UP SIT DOWN OR ELSE to a new height. Ever since STRONG MAYOR POWERS has come to play. The ego has swollen and it is ‘do as we tell you or you will be removed and issued a NO TRESPASS notice.’
This is where the problem lies. Surely, this type of abusive attitude is being noticed across Canada. Surely, many people from many backgrounds have taken notice. The video released by the mayor in my opinion is contradiction to the City own City Code of Conduct policy. Where is the integrity commissioner? Oh wait, they are paid by the city. This video, I think was a huge mistake by the mayor as it shows his dislike for one particular member of council. The video clearly is an attempt to discredit her integrity in the community. To make a false association that this councillor has ties to a group that he has failed to prove. The video shows the level of abuse by the mayor as he clearly violates his own City Code of Conduct and openly displays his misogynistic attitude towards a fellow member of council. Peace does not come about by the escalation of hostility and this is what this video is.
Canada looking forward to 2025
Canada looking
forward to 2025
by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC,
FEC, CET, P. Eng.
Former Member of Parliament
Pickering-Scarborough East
The year just beginning could be an interesting one, with turning points in politics, economics and culture, provided that common sense and moral clarity prevails both at home and abroad.
Frankly, the geopolitical situation in the world is most concerning. The two regional wars in Ukraine and Gaza have the potential to spread, provoking direct confrontation between NATO and the western democracies in general, versus Russia, Iran, North Korea and China.
Ukraine now stands to lose significant international interest and support. In the United States in particular, it has become a distant second (and increasingly third or lower) policy priority with the new Trump administration becoming more and more skeptical about offering further help. The conflict is likely to escalate with unforeseen consequences.
In the conflict between Israel, Hamas and Hezbolah there is no obvious way to end the fighting and the collapse of Syria’s Bashar government is adding to the chaos. Whatever the military outcome, a dramatic increase in radicalization is a certainty. On the one hand, the Israeli Jews feel globally isolated and even hated after facing the worst violence against them since the Holocaust. On the other hand, the Palestinians face what they consider a genocide. With scarce opportunities for peace and no prospect of escape, this situation has the potential of developing into a wider conflict in the region.
Deep and dangerous political divisions over the conflict permeate the Middle East, engulfing over one billion people in the broader Muslim world, not to mention the United States and Europe.
New and problematic situations are developing in the Arabian Sea, in South America between Venezuela and Guyana, not to mention the increasing tensions in the South China Sea.
None of these major military conflicts has adequate guardrails to prevent them from getting worse. What is most problematic is that none of the belligerents agrees on what they are fighting over.
Upcoming elections in 2025 pose additional challenges in Canada. Fully one-third of the global population will go to the polls this year. However, in terms of world security, stability and economic outlook, the new Trump administration in the US, with its 25% import tariff on the horizon will pose the most consequential challenge by far.
In the face of all this turmoil, Canada has generally been missing in action on the international scene. Even worse, our country has sometimes undermined its own international standing.
Sitting at the international table requires a moral compass, professionalism, determination and military self sufficiency. A military free-rider will not be tolerated for long. Canada’s decision to act as a self-important virtue-signaller irritates allies who must shoulder our share of the burden, as well as third-world countries who see Canada’s posturing as post-colonial arrogance.
On the domestic scene, Canada is facing a challenging year both economically and politically. There is a real prospect of recession and a future depreciation of the standard of living unless drastic measures are taken. The Liberal government seems to have lost its direction. Overwhelmed by the issues, it seems to have no solution for upcoming events, and continues to be influenced by the policies of the World Economic Forum (WEF).
The World Economic Forum, which will meet in mid January, continues to try to influence global governmental, industrial and social agendas. Its “Great Reset” envisages a new economic and social order based on a futuristic globalist approach that would reduce national interests through pervasive oversight mechanisms, including central bank digital currencies. In essence, it is encouraging woke social and economic policies in order to implement a new futuristic globalist world order following a trend in line with “deja vue” fake Marxist theories but far more sophisticated and deceptive.
Forum chairman Klaus Schwab has assured elite Davos attendees that “The future belongs to us”. Comforting words for those jealously guarding their influence and accustomed to ignoring rules that apply only to the plebe.
Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney are on the WEF board of trustees and Justin Trudeau’s Liberal party certainly reflects its centre-left technocratic view. However, the sudden resignation of Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister and deputy Prime Minister has thrown the governing Liberal Party
in turmoil and is challenging the leadership of Prime Minister Trudeau with unknown consequences.
On the economic front, Canadians’ personal prosperity, as measured by GDP per capita, is projected to continue to decline this year by more than two per cent.
To address affordability and the dismal outlook for long-term productivity, the federal government needs to shift focus from identity politics and climate obsession to economic growth, fiscal responsibility and raising Canadians’ standard of living.
In the hope that this year will be a better one and our politicians will put the national interest and the wellbeing of our citizens in the forefront, let us be optimistic. The year has just started.
I hope you will take all these thoughts in the spirit they are intended: We have entered a year of grave concern, but let us be supported by the hope that tough times bring out the best in us.
Happy New Year 2025!
Saturday, December 28, 2024
The Times They Are a Changing
The Times They Are a
Changing
By Theresa Grant - Real Estate Columnist
The Real Estate market is a dynamic entity, continuously shifting between favouring buyers and sellers. Durham Region has been in a balanced market for quite some time now. In fact some would say that the market in Durham Region has been soft, quiet, weak. Any way you want to put it, houses have been sitting on the market in many cases, for months before selling or terminating with a thought to try listing again in a stronger market.
Houses that are priced properly right out of the gate tend to sell quickly and still do. The would-be buyers have certainly sent a message to the sellers that they are not willing to pay more than the actual value of the home. Unfortunately, some home sellers are still stuck in the Covid craziness days and think that people are going to pay well more than what the house is worth. Another thing that potential home buyers have sent a strong message to the home sellers on is the idea of holding offers. Having a presentation date is not really effective when the buyers aren’t buying to begin with. Numerous houses have had their presentation date come and go with either no offers or low offers, but not high enough to seal a deal. The whole idea of an offer presentation date is to garner as much interest in the property as possible, bring in as many offers at one time as you can, as this benefits the seller client.
We are seeing more and more listings saying, “offers anytime”, just like it used to be prior to Covid. I don’t think the offer presentation is going anywhere; I think that it is only effective in a seller’s market and that people will eventually understand that.
With the Bank of Canada continuing to cut rates, Many will stay firmly planted on the sidelines, where they’ve been for a couple of years now. They will patiently wait for the news that the rates have hit rock bottom and then plan their jump into the market. The only problem with that is that when the rates finally hit rock bottom, the house prices will have risen considerably. Most analysts expect the Bank of Canada to cut through 2025.
There is a sweet spot in the market right now and many buyers are taking advantage of this window of opportunity. Houses that have been sitting on the market for four, five, and even six months are now being snapped up. Buyers that thought they had time to look at a house, think about it and view it again before making a decision are finding that they don’t have that luxury at all in a lot of cases.
I know a young couple looking for their first home and they are having their viewings cancelled because the house they were going to look at, that has been on the market for four months has just sold. This has happened to them in a few times. This indicates that the market is starting to tighten up. Inventory is really starting to move. It will be very interesting to see what 2025 holds in store for the Durham Region market.
Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)