Making A Difference

Making A Difference

By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Articles Published Columns in Canada and The United States Everyone likes to complain. But far from few actually stand up against all odds and do something about it. We are upon a call to action by our Provincial elect. Out of the blue Ford calls and election as to expect to solidify the seats of conservatives across the Province. A bold move, that test the will of taxpayers at large. By now you all may be aware that I put my name forth Ontario New Blue Party as your Oshawa candidate. If we learned anything from the recent U.S. elections. It is time to put new blood in office. Stop electing - re-electing careered politicians that once they get in they sit on their hands. The U.S. took the right lead. Elect someone from outside the establishment. A successful business person with a proven business track record. Someone that knows the value of a dollar and the commitment to sacrifice in the name of humanity. As a candidate. I will not profess to know everything. But what I know I know it well. I may not have all the answers. But I have the solutions to real problems founded on experience. this is why I am running. We have millions of dollar coming to Oshawa through the Province and in my opinion they are wasted. The sitting NDP MPP has let jobs slip out of Oshawa and is content with token jobs in return. The MPP in my opinion is not approachable, arrogant and ignorant of the billions of dollars sitting on the side lines wanting to come to Ontario. To Oshawa. For the past 4 years she has yet to return a phone call to her local City newspaper. French as the City of Oshawa candidate has never visited me or any local business that I know off to ask what our needs may be from the Province. I think it is time to stop the waste of tax dollars we are paying this MPP and elect someone that has first hand experience in the downtown. Someone that has brought to Oshawa the only successful shop local campaign as seen by the many signs posted on local downtown shops. All I am asking for an opportunity to serve you. I will not promise you anything but instead deliver the assurance of working with the municipal government to put and end to people living on the street. I will deliver good paying jobs by approaching developers, business owners and the right type of industry to come to Oshawa. I will aggressively look for funding to better all aspects of Oshawanians. I will develop special partnerships, sponsorship with corporations and those directly involved in finance to assure that our downtown may thrive again. To get rid of crime by working with DRPS for more funding. I will work hard to influence an Ontario balanced budget. I will assure every citizens that all calls will be answered and returned. I promise to bring government back to you. To uphold decency and dignity. To protect our identity and bring back economic pride to Oshawa. Now it is your choice. You have a choice to make a positive difference in your life.

Pickering's Public Forum turns into a racist, pornographic nightmare!

Pickering's Public Forum turns into a racist, pornographic nightmare! By Lisa Robinson On Wednesday February 12, 2025, which was meant to be a transparent, inclusive discussion on our Climate Adaptation Plan for all ages degenerated into an unmitigated horror show. Instead of fostering meaningful community dialogue, the City of Pickering’s virtual Open House became a stage for racist slurs, repeated displays of swastikas, and graphic pornographic content—images that no one, especially an event for all ages, including children should ever be forced to endure. The flagrant failure of City staff is at the heart of this atrocity. With full control over the meeting, they did nothing to immediately shut down the broadcast. By neglecting to disable participants’ microphones and cameras, they provided a free rein for these perpetrators to spread hate, and explicit disgusting pornographic content, leaving our community exposed and traumatized. I can honestly say that I will never be the same after witnessing such a disturbing and deeply traumatizing event. As if this horrific incident were not enough, the hypocrisy of the City of Pickering has reached a new low by launching a calculated attack on my integrity. Recently, they have been trying to falsely accuse me of “aiding and abetting harassment” solely because I publicly condemned hateful remarks made on a podcast. Let me be absolutely clear: I denounced a hateful remark both in an email to my colleagues and live on his podcast, repeatedly stating that I do not condone what the host said or any form of violence. To further clarify, I never even heard the remark because I was taken off the podcast the time it was made, and the announcer explicitly declared that his words were entirely his own and not reflective of my views. Again, I want to be clear – I have never met this person before. I had no prior knowledge of them, no connection, no relationship of any kind before that podcast. I simply participated as a guest, unaware of what they would say or do. Any attempt to suggest otherwise is false. The absurdity of twisting my decisive, public denunciation into grounds for an investigation is a deliberate act of public mischief—a manufactured narrative designed solely to silence me and try to remove me from Council for consistently speaking the truth and calling out the corruption that I have witnessed during my tenure. If the City of Pickering is so quick to claim that I was aiding and abetting harassment—an act over which I had absolutely no control and one that I condemned publicly—then it is only logical that they should be thoroughly investigated for aiding and abetting racist slurs, hate symbols, and the distribution of pornography. Their failure to secure a safe space during the meeting, by not disabling participants’ cameras and microphones, allowed these heinous acts to occur. Yet, instead of acknowledging this gross negligence, the Corporation of the City of Pickering is busy fabricating false narratives and even pressured me into removing video evidence that serves the public interest. Not only have they not even issued an official apology to me or anyone else who witnessed this appalling incident, but they are also desperately trying to suppress the truth about what really happened. This is nothing short of a cover-up, a sham attempt to shift blame away from their own undeniable failures. I call for immediate answers. Who was responsible for moderating the meeting, and why was it not shut down the moment hate speech and explicit content erupted? Which members of leadership were aware of these events—and when did they finally act? Will the same unfounded legal standards now being used to target me be applied to those whose gross negligence allowed this atrocity to occur? I am not only traumatized by what I witnessed but I am also appalled by the lengths to which our City’s leadership will go to suppress the truth. Our community deserves a safe, respectful public forum and leaders who take responsibility, not ones who attempt to rewrite history to deflect their own failures. A police investigation is now underway, and I will not rest until every individual responsible for this disgrace is held accountable. The City of Pickering must stop shifting blame and begin addressing its own gross negligence for the sake of transparency, accountability, and the wellbeing of our community. I am Councillor Lisa Robinson, The People’s Councillor!

Employers Are Not in the 'Give a Chance Business'

Employers Are Not in the 'Give a Chance Business' By Nick Kossovan Many job seekers become frustrated and angry because they believe employers should take a chance on hiring them. Most job seekers fail, or refuse, to grasp that hiring is a critical business decision involving an investment of their time, money, and trust—the stakes are high. Great hires can propel a team forward, while bad hires can create setbacks, disrupt a company's culture, and waste resources. When a hiring manager assesses a candidate, they're not just asking, "Can this person do the job?" they're also asking: · Will this person stick around? · Will they be manageable? · Will they fit into the current team and culture? · Will I regret hiring this person six months from now? A common phrase among job seekers is "Give people a chance." Expecting employers to take a chance on you and blaming them when they don't displays a sense of entitlement. Employers aren't in the business of giving chances. Business survival requires being risk-averse. Minimizing hiring risks is in a business's best interest. In this respect, it's the job seeker's responsibility to demonstrate why the reward of hiring them outweighs the risk. The job market is a battlefield where there are many job seekers who, admittedly, out of desperation, are, to put it mildly, "not playing fair." An employer's hiring decision isn't merely about filling a vacancy. The person hired will, to some extent, affect their bottom line, team chemistry, and long-term goals. I've seen, as you likely have, how hiring the wrong person can lead to productivity losses, decreased morale, and budget wasting. You can't fault employers for selecting employees cautiously; you would, too, if you owned the business. On the other hand, employers can be regarded as 'givers of low-risk chances.' No matter how much due diligence an employer does to mitigate hiring risks, they're still taking a chance—a risk—on the candidate who they deemed to be the most qualified, will deliver the results the business needs, and will fit their culture. Despite employers designing their hiring process in ways they believe will mitigate hiring risks, hiring people doesn't come with any guarantees. The best an employer can do is hire the candidate they believe poses the lowest hiring risk. Most job seekers focus on demonstrating their skills and experience but fail to consider how they might appear as a hiring risk, such as: · Being underqualified or overqualified · Posting negative comments on social media · Exhibiting a sense of entitlement · Having a lengthy employment gap · Holding several short-term jobs Applying for a job involves being compared to everyone else who applied. Put yourself in the employer's shoes. If you received over 500 applications for a Sales Director role, whom would you find "less risky"? Candidate A: Has had four jobs in seven years. Candidate B: Has been at their current job for 14 years. Candidate A: Has a complete LinkedIn profile (profile picture, banner, completed sections) showing the measurable value they've brought to previous employers. Candidate B: Has an incomplete LinkedIn profile. Candidate A: Was referred by an employee. Candidate B: Applied online. Candidate A: Includes a compelling cover letter. Candidate B: Doesn't include a cover letter. It's the job seeker's responsibility to prove that they're worth taking a hiring risk on. You should approach your job search strategically, showing that you are not just another candidate, but one who can add measurable value to the business, such as increasing revenue, reducing costs, or solving problems. With so many qualified job seekers in the job market, why would an employer opt for a candidate with perceived risks? If you believe employers should "give you a chance," you're setting yourself up for disappointment, leading to frustration and anger. Instead, flip the script and show employers that you're a low-risk hire who will add value to their business. Here's how: Build a Strong Resume and LinkedIn Profile: Numbers are the language of business; speak it! Use numbers to demonstrate your past successes and value. Employers hire results, not unsubstantiated opinions. Leverage Networking: A warm introduction will significantly reduce the perceived risks of hiring you. Contact people in your professional network who are connected to the employer you're applying to or may know someone connected to your targeted employer. (It's a small world.) Prepare for Interviews: Don't just respond to questions; prepare thoughtful questions for your interviewer, thus showing enthusiasm and engagement. Follow-Up: Few job seekers send thank-you notes after interviews; therefore, doing so sets you apart. A thank-you note shows initiative, reiterates your interest, and, most importantly, gives you an opportunity to address any concerns raised during the interview. As for cultural fit, I believe in being yourself and letting the chips fall where they fall. Don't contort yourself, as self-proclaimed career coaches advise job seekers to try to "fit in"; if the employer doesn't see you as a fit, why would you want to join? Employers don't owe you a chance; they owe their business and existing employees the lowest hiring risk they can find. It's on you to show employers that hiring you is a low-risk decision they won't regret making. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

My Old House

By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist I have always loved old houses. I don’t know exactly what it is that attracts me to them. Maybe it’s the uniqueness of them, how every room is a bit different than the next. I love the little quirks that you find as you walk through a century home. It could be a little step up here or there. An odd shaped door or window, and don’t even get me going on the moldings. Things from yester year, that make walking through some houses just like stepping back in time. I remember when I bought the old semi on Celina St. My daughter walked in and said, “oh wow, look at the doorknobs on the bedroom doors”. They were the old-fashioned glass doorknobs that you just don’t see anymore. They actually reminded me of my grandparents’ farmhouse doors when I was a child. There are so many wonderful old houses here in Oshawa that I would love to fix up. Keep some of the original charm and update the rest of the house, making it a perfect blend of old and new. Alas, I can only fix up the one I live in at the moment, so that is exactly what I am doing. I will take you along with me as I complete the renovations on my old house. I bought this house in 2020. Just before Covid-19 sent the real estate market into a frenzy of activity. It will actually be a combination of renovation and interior decoration. I have decided that I want to change the entire colour scheme of the house, on both floors. There is a finished basement but that has just been redone, and I quite like it. When I bought the house, I had the main floor painted a cocoa beige kind of colour, very earthy. I really liked it. I still like it, but I got it into my head that I wanted to go with a beach theme. I really want to lighten the rooms up, and I’ve always loved bright pops of colour. So, on the main floor there is only the kitchen, living room and hallway that are being redone. There is a bedroom on the main floor, however I use that as an office. It’s done in the earthy colour and because the door is closed to that room most of the time, I will leave it for now. So, stay tuned weekly for progress updates on my old house. As always, if you have questions about anything you read in my column just drop me a line and I’ll be sure to answer them..

Truths Job Seekers Conveniently Ignore

Truths Job Seekers Conveniently Ignore By Nick Kossovan "You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality," - Ayn Rand, Russian-born American writer, Atlas Shrugged (1957) Acknowledging current job market realities is imperative for job search success. Clinging to comforting narratives while ignoring hard truths will not change how employers operate, especially regarding their respective hiring process. Most job seekers conveniently ignore the following seven uncomfortable truths, which, if they accepted, would expedite their job search. 1. There's always someone younger and hungrier than you. When it comes to "job search truisms that suck," this is at the top. Job searching is a competition against other candidates, AI, automation, low-cost overseas labour, and the advantages of using contractors and freelancers. Achieving success in this competitive landscape requires being hungrier than your competition, as winning typically demands a strong desire to prevail. I view "someone younger and hungrier" (and more skilled) as a call to action. While you can't "youth appeal," you can lessen its influence on hiring decisions by: · Assuring employers you're relevant—not "dated"—that you keep up with technology, social media's ebbs and flows, and ever-shifting social norms. · Demonstrating you can work autonomously. (read: you'll be easy to manage) · Cultivating professional relationships that can vouch for your value to an employer. · Establishing you don't have a sense of entitlement—the Achilles heel of most job seekers. 2. You don't own your job; your employer does. The phrase "my job" is an oxymoron. Layoffs illustrate that the job belongs to the employer, yet many job seekers chase the illusion of job security. My take is an employee is renting their job until they no longer want the job or their employer requires their services. Job seekers would shorten their job search by adopting a renter's mindset. In other words, don't look for what doesn't exist—a permanent employment situation. Renting is primarily about having a roof over your head; therefore, we tend to accept, within reason, "less than ideal" (e.g., neighbourhood, kitchen layout, bathroom size). The motivation to buy a home is to build equity, which, as you know, is more challenging, expensive, and requires a long-term commitment. When job searching, think of yourself looking for a rental situation; looking for a job that meets your immediate income needs is a quicker route to landing a job than looking for your "ideal work situation." 3. What you show is what an employer will know. Employers hire results, not opinions. Most resumes and LinkedIn profiles are merely lists of opinions; hence, they fail to attract opportunities. Vague claims like "I'm a team player" lack substance. You must quantify: "I was part of a 12-member sales team with a $6.5 million quota." Numbers, the language of business, illustrate your impact and make you a more attractive candidate. 4. You don't define your worth; employers do. A sense of entitlement fuels the obsession with being paid what you're worth. Basic economics: A product or service's worth is largely determined by how well it solves a customer's problem, meets their needs, and compares with competing products. As I mentioned, when job searching, you're competing against candidates who are younger and hungrier than you. Thus, they're willing to work for a lower wage to get their foot in the door, gain experience, and prove themselves. The reason many job seekers experience a lengthy job search is because they possess an inflated sense of their value to employers and overlook their competition. 5. Employers are moving away from remote jobs. Their company, their rules. It's no secret that many companies, such as Starbucks, Amazon, Meta, Walmart, and Trump mandating federal workers return to the office full-time, are ending the remote work setup during COVID, which gave white-collar workers a taste of the privilege of working from home. From what I'm observing and hearing, abuse of working from home is prevalent; hence, I agree with employers having their employees RTO and employees having to manage their workdays as they did pre-COVID. For a faster job search, be open to working onsite. If WFH is a non-negotiable 'must-have,' be prepared for a lengthy job search as the number of WFH opportunities is rapidly shrinking. 6. Your LinkedIn profile and activity on LinkedIn matter more than your resume. What has more visibility, your resume, which is only seen by those you give it to, or your LinkedIn profile, which anyone can view 24/7/365? Given how influential your LinkedIn profile can be to your job search and career, I find it surprising that I still see profiles that scream, "I'm not serious about my job search or career!" With all the information and guides available it's inexcusable not to create a fully optimized LinkedIn profile that'll attract opportunities. 7. Your likability supersedes your skills and experience. Hiring managers don't hire candidates they don't like; hence, likability is a job seeker's biggest asset. While your resume, cover letter and LinkedIn profile job will get you interviews, the success of your interview will be primarily determined by how likable you are; therefore, being likable is a trait (read: skill) worth fostering.cover letter that may (but is not guaranteed) encourage the hiring manager to contact you, then how badly you want the job becomes questionable. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

A human tragedy that must never happen again

A human tragedy that must never happen again by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East As we deal with a new conflagration in Europe and its many victims, we need to reflect for a moment on the human tragedy of cataclysmic proportion that happened during WW2, and hope that this kind of thing will never happen again. On May 8, 1945, Winston Churchill announced that the Allies had secured Victory in Europe. Later that year, Japan would finally surrender, and World War II would end. It is hard to believe that in 2025, we will mark the 80th Anniversary of the end of World War II; a tragedy that was the most devastating event of the last century. This war was the deadliest military conflict in human history. An estimated 70 to 85 million people perished in it; or about 3% of the world population in 1940. The World War II conflagration saw very high civilian casualties. Civilian deaths totaled 50 to 55 million. Of this, the victims of genocide and ethnic cleansing numbered close to 25 million. Around 17 million perished as victims of Nazi Germany and its collaborators, and 7.6 million were victims of the communist rule in the Soviet Union. The ferocity of Nazi killings was motivated by the idea of ethnic cleansing. These racially motivated crimes included the persecution of Roma and the handicapped, the murder of Soviet prisoners of war, Polish and Soviet civilians, as well as political prisoners, religious dissenters, and homosexuals, adding to the number of innocent victims of war. In January 1942, top Nazi leaders convened in the outer lakeside Berlin suburb of Wannsee to outline the “Final Solution of the Jewish Question in Europe”, without regard for geographic boundaries. In total, 11 million Jews would be targeted for extermination. Without a whimper, the thirteen officials signed off on the ‘Final Solution’. The minutes would record their decision to ‘cleanse the German living space of Jews in a legal manner’. This marked the darkest seminal moment in a series of events that would see the murder of 6 million Jews, an abhorrence beyond comprehension in our modern, comfortable lives. The Holocaust is the term generally used to describe the genocide of approximately six million European Jews during World War II. Entire families, old men and women and young children were killed in the Nazi extermination camps by ferocious and inhumane methods. According to Polish Institute of National Remembrance (IPN) researchers, 2,830,000 Jews were murdered in the Nazi death camps (500,000 in Belzec; 150,000 in Sobibor; 850,000 in Treblinka; 150,000 in Chelmno; 1,100,000 in Auschwitz and 80,000 in Majdanek. In the Nazi occupied territory of the USSR the Nazi Einsatzgruppen killed another 1.4 million Jewish people by mobile gas chambers and mass executions. Eighty years ago, on 27 January 1945, Soviet soldiers from the 60th Army of the First Ukrainian Front advanced into Poland and liberated Auschwitz. There, amid mountains of corpses, they discovered about 7,650 men, women and children, starving, stricken by disease, barely living. They also found hundreds of thousands of personal effects, and 700 tons of human hair. These broken human beings were among the handful of survivors of the 1.3 million people who had passed through the gates of Auschwitz. In November 2005, the United Nations General Assembly proclaimed 27 January 1945, the day on which Auschwitz was liberated, as International Remembrance Day to mark the tragedy of the Holocaust. It commemorates the genocide that resulted in the deaths of 6 million Jews and 11 million others, by the Nazi regime and its collaborators. It urges every member nation of the U.N. to honour the memory of Holocaust victims, and encourages the development of educational programs about Holocaust history to help prevent future acts of genocide. It condemns all manifestations of religious intolerance, incitement, harassment or violence against persons or communities based on ethnic origin or religious belief. The International Day in memory of the victims of the Holocaust is thus a day on which we must reassert our commitment to human rights. We must also go beyond remembrance, and make sure that new generations know this history. We must apply the lessons of the Holocaust to today’s world. After the horrors of the 20th century, there should be no room for intolerance in the 21st. The only way to honour the memory of the Holocaust is to turn remembrance into the promise of a better future. Preserving and transmitting the memory is a duty towards those who lost their lives, and towards our children. In commemorating the dead, we are inspired by the triumph of the human spirit given us by those who survived. "Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it." Winston Churchill A nation that does not know nor understand its history, is dangerous. Life’s paradox is that often it is those things, most important to us, that we have a tendency to take for granted. We are fortunate as Canadians, whether by birth or by choice, to enjoy political, economic and religious freedoms. To live in a nation in which faith coexists with reason, free academic inquiry, a free press and independent judiciary is a blessing and we need to preserve it. And yet support for democracy is diminishing. We are defined most by our values and our beliefs, the way we relate to one another and see our place in the world. We are shaped by our heroes and villains, our triumphs and failures. The way as a people we have faced adversity and how we will face the inevitable adversities that are coming. How we respond to them will shape our future. Nations, like people, face ‘moments of truth’. There are moments in history which challenge our very survival and values. Well led, we emerge stronger, more resilient. Under poor leadership, we may suffer lasting damage. Six million Jews were murdered in an act of unspeakable genocidal barbarism. So too were homosexuals, Roma, the disabled and political dissidents. In a world grappling with the mass movement of people, the persecution of political, ethnic and religious minorities, the push for euthanasia and a generational struggle against resurgent religious extremism, we must remind ourselves not only of why we fought wars but also what human kind is capable of, and the circumstances that lead to it. Today we live in vast ignorance of the decisions we make and that are made for us, facing extraordinary global uncertainty and immense technological change. No human being, no Canadian who believes in the dignity of man, of freedom and democratic principles, should ever allow the Holocaust to be forgotten through neglectful indifference; that the events, the people, their lives and stories, become distant strangers. These heinous events and those who survived them teach us many things. Most importantly they inspire us to have the moral courage, irrespective of personal consequences, to act on what, in our hearts, we know to be right. “It is not often that nations learn from the past, even rarer that they draw the correct conclusions from it.” ? Henry Kissinger Are we ready to do it right?

Exposing More Lies & Corruption: The Truth About Pickering’s Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT)

Exposing More Lies & Corruption: The Truth About Pickering’s Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) By Lisa Robinson Today, I’m speaking out because I’m tired of the lies, manipulation, and deceit coming from some council members and city staff. What happened during the January 13th Executive Committee meeting is a prime example of why trust in government continues to erode. During that meeting, staff recommended implementing a 4% Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) on hotels and motels in Pickering. They justified it by claiming that 'many' municipalities had already adopted the tax, but here’s the truth: only 15 out of 444 municipalities have done so—that’s just 3.4%. Calling that 'many' is not only inaccurate, it's a lie designed to manipulate public perception. That kind of intentional distortion is corruption, plain and simple. I asked our Director of Economic Development, Mr. Fiaz Jadoon, whether hotels and motels had been consulted. He assured me that they had and claimed there were no significant concerns. Based on that assurance, the vote passed 6-1 and was set to return to Council on January 27th. I of course, was the dissenting vote. But here’s where it gets worse. At the January 27th Council meeting, I asked the same question again. This time, Mr. Jadoon once again claimed that all hotels had been consulted. I pushed back because I had done my homework—and I had a different answer. Only then did the Mayor finally admit, reading from what looked like a script, that the higher-ups at our biggest hotel—Great Canadian Gaming—had not been consulted and even confirmed they were not on board with charging this new tax. So let me ask you: Why did the Mayor allow this lie to continue? Why didn’t the truth come out until I exposed it? If I hadn’t challenged them, that false information would have stood as fact. And this isn’t the first time this has happened. When I was first elected, Mr. Jadoon claimed that businesses along Kingston Road had been consulted about development plans. Once again, I did my research, and once again, I discovered that it was a complete lie. This pattern of dishonesty is not a mistake—it’s deliberate. And that’s why I keep asking questions and pushing back. Because if I don’t, who will? Thankfully, Councillor Cook seconded my motion to send this tax proposal back to staff for proper consultation. But let’s be clear: two members of Council actually voted against delaying the vote, even after knowing our largest hotel was not supportive. The Mayor, Councillor Nagy, and Mr. Jadoon all argue that a 4% tax increase is insignificant, but when combined with other taxes, it totals a 17% increase—a significant burden on businesses and consumers, especially when people are already struggling to make ends meet. Lying to the public to manipulate outcomes is corruption. And I won’t stand by and let it happen. I’ve already lost three months of pay for daring to say that corruption starts at the top. And here we are—proof that it does. I am Councillor Robinson, 'The People’s Councillor,' and I will continue to fight for transparency, honesty, and the people of Pickering. I am Councillor Lisa Robinson, The People’s Councillor

FORD’S $189M ELECTION GAMBLE: A BID FOR POWER, NOT THE PEOPLE

FORD’S $189M ELECTION GAMBLE: A BID FOR POWER, NOT THE PEOPLE By Sami Parvez Ontario Premier Doug Ford has called an early provincial election, citing the need for a stronger majority amidst threats from Trump’s tariffs. However, the reality seems different — with his party already leading strongly in the polls, Ford appears eager to capitalize on this political advantage. Like many politicians intoxicated by power, whether prime ministers or premiers, they often seek to extend their rule indefinitely. Many politicians often prioritize political gains over taxpayer interests. On January 28, Ford met with Lt.-Gov. Edith Dumont to dissolve the Ontario Legislature and call an early provincial election, costing taxpayers $189 million. The election will take place on Thursday, February 27, making it Ontario’s first winter election since 1883. For the past year, there had been speculation that Ford would call an early election, and he never ruled it out. Finally, he called the election, and taxpayers will pay the price. The $189 million could be better spent on healthcare, addressing the housing crisis, or supporting homeless individuals. According to Feed Ontario, A hunger-relief organization and advocacy group focused on ending hunger and poverty through fresh food delivery, innovative programs, and research-driven change through research and advocacy, "40% of food banks have reduced the amount of food they provide, and half have been forced to cut wrap-around services amid record-high demand and resource shortages. There was a 25% increase in the use of food banks in Ontario compared to 2023, marking the eighth consecutive year of growth." Ford’s Progressive Conservative Party already holds a large majority, with 79 out of 124 seats. Despite this, he is still not satisfied. This is not about securing a larger majority but about keeping his job for the next four years. For the past nine years, the Liberals have been in power at the federal level, but they are now trailing their main rivals, the Conservatives, by over 20 points in the polls. Ford isn’t willing to take any risks, anticipating that the federal Conservatives will likely secure a majority in the next election. If they falter during their first term, his government could suffer the consequences in 2026 if the election remains on its fixed date. "When the tariffs hit, it affects the media, it affects manufacturing, it affects every single sector in this province," Ford told reporters on Jan. 24. "So you better pray that we get elected, because I'm going to protect everyone's job, including the media's job." Ford presents himself as the only leader capable of dealing with Trump. He attacked his main rivals, NDP Leader Marit Stiles and Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie, during a campaign-style news conference in Brampton, Ont., on Jan. 24. Mocking his opponents during a Jan. 24 news conference, he said: "Imagine Bonnie Crombie or Marit Stiles sitting across from President Trump negotiating a deal. It would be an absolute disaster. And God help us if that ever happens." According to polling aggregator 338Canada.com, if an election were held today, the Progressive Conservatives (PC) would win a historic 45% of the vote, securing 99 seats. The Ontario Liberals would follow with 26% of the vote, earning 8 seats, while the NDP would capture 21% of the vote and 14 seats. The Ontario Greens are projected to receive 6% of the vote, winning 2 seats. Additionally, an independent candidate could also secure a seat in the Ontario Legislature. “Right now, President Trump has put uncertainty to every single Canadian, a lot of other countries around the world, and this isn’t going to happen overnight. It may not happen Feb. 1, I’m sure something’s coming, but this is going to be a battle for the next four years, and I want to make sure that I have a strong mandate to outlast President Trump,” Ford told the media after the writ was dropped on Tuesday Jan. 28. Ontario opposition leaders accuse Ford of calling an early election for political gain, arguing that it is unnecessary and a waste of taxpayer money on the on the first day of election campaign on Wednesday, Jan. 29. We should be here at Queen’s Park, working across party lines to show strength through unity in the face of Donald Trump’s threats. Instead, Doug Ford has called an election, abandoning the people of Ontario when they need him the most,” Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said in a speech at Queen’s Park on Wednesday, “Clearly, Doug Ford cares more about his job than he does about yours.” “We are here today because Doug Ford doesn’t care about you. Because he has decided to spend $175 million on an election we don’t need, rather than spending that money on getting you a family doctor or on anything to make your life a little easier,” Crombie said in Barrie on Wednesday, slamming Ford for calling an early election in a key riding the Liberals aim to flip from the PCs. In her campaign launch in downtown Toronto on Wednesday, NDP Leader Marit Stiles mocked Ford’s ability as a negotiator. “Doug Ford as our negotiator, are you kidding?” Stiles said. “Time and time again, Doug Ford has shown he can’t negotiate his way out of a paper bag.” Ford is using the threat of Trump’s tariffs as an excuse for calling an early election, even though U.S. President Donald Trump has stated that Canada cannot prevent the tariffs set to take effect on Feb. 1. This makes Ford’s justification for spending $189 million on an unnecessary election even weaker. Ontarians need stronger government support to secure necessities such as food, healthcare, shelter, and economic stability. They don’t want one person to cling to power indefinitely. Ontarians deserve better governance, true leadership, and greater accountability. It’s time for the government to put citizens’ well-being ahead of political gains. Ford's decision proves he is more focused on power than on addressing Ontario's real crises.

Fear-Mongering, Control, and Public Mischief: Pickering’s Leadership is Undermining Democracy

Fear-Mongering, Control, and Public Mischief: Pickering’s Leadership is Undermining Democracy The City of Pickering’s decision to move council meetings online under the pretense of safety is nothing more than a calculated, cynical effort to stifle dissent, manipulate public perception, and consolidate power. Let’s be clear: this isn’t about safety—it’s about control. The over-the-top deployment of police officers at council meetings, combined with the laughable propaganda video released weeks ago, makes it abundantly clear: they’re fabricating fear to justify authoritarian measures and silence the growing voices of discontent among the residents. If there were truly credible threats, would the mayor and staff invite their families—wives, children, even eight-year-old grandchildren—to council meetings? Would councillors freely attend ribbon-cuttings and photo ops without so much as a police officer in sight? Or how about our New Year’s Eve celebrations or the Mayor’s Levee with hundreds of attendees and maybe a single police officer? Would my female colleague casually ride a scooter alone in public? These actions completely betray their claims of danger and expose this shift to virtual meetings for what it truly is: a pretext to shut down public engagement, not to protect anyone. We’re being fed the tired, old excuse that public officials are somehow in danger—a pathetic, overused refrain designed to justify controlling measures. But let’s be real: politicians in public service always face threats, insults, and sometimes worse. It’s part of the job. If they can’t handle it, then they should get out of public office. The mayor, council, and staff are far more concerned with avoiding accountability than actually serving the people. They’re more interested in playing with their phones, rolling their eyes, flailing their arms in the air or trying to storm out of meetings when things don’t go their way. Watch how they look visibly irritated, acting like spoiled children when they’re asked to do their job. The mayor can’t even resist watching sporting events during council sessions. And let’s not forget how they race through a consent agenda, proudly declaring "democracy quick tonight," with no debate, no questions, and no input from the public. They’ve turned council meetings into a joke. They’re timing themselves to see who can wrap things up the fastest. Who can shut down debate the quickest? Who can call for a consent agenda with the least amount of thought? This isn’t leadership; it’s a mockery of the democratic process. They have no respect for the people they serve or the issues that matter to this community. It’s all about convenience for them. This is not leadership. This is public mischief. The mayor and council have made it crystal clear: they don’t want to do their job. They don’t want to be held accountable. They’d rather be on vacation, glued to their devices, or anywhere but engaging with the public and doing what they were elected to do. They’ve taken my pay as punishment for standing up for you, the people. But they can’t take your pay, so they’ve chosen to take away your voice. By refusing to provide you with an arena to be heard—by shutting down in-person participation—they’ve stolen another vital right from you. They’ve already silenced you with their absurd policies and procedures that restrict your ability to speak and record. And now, they’ve gone even further. You won’t even be able to attend meetings, raise your concerns face-to-face, and hold your elected officials accountable. Instead, they’ll simply mute your microphone or cut the connection when they don’t like what you have to say. This is an attack on democracy, plain and simple. It’s an attack on your right to be heard. In the weeks leading up to the Mayor and staff’s decision to push for virtual meetings, they called for the deployment of two, then four, paid-duty officers at our council meetings. And as if that wasn’t enough, Durham Regional Police sent an additional ten officers—just out of the “goodness of their hearts.” This is an outrageous waste of taxpayer dollars and a calculated attempt to manufacture fear. While our streets are being overrun with rising crime—carjackings, human trafficking, gun violence—police officers are being pulled away from real emergencies to babysit peaceful meetings of fewer than 30 people. There has been no history of violence in our council chambers during my entire tenure. This isn’t about safety. It’s about creating a façade of fear to intimidate residents and shut them out of the conversation. It’s an abuse of power and resources, plain and simple. What makes this even more egregious is the fact that the city had already planned to move meetings online this late spring or perhaps early summer due to council chamber renovations. So, instead of relocating to an accessible venue—like a recreation center—to ensure continued in-person public engagement, they seized this opportunity to shut the public out entirely. By hiding behind manufactured fear, they’ve bypassed their responsibility to engage with the public face-to-face. Why spend millions renovating chambers when they no longer intend to use them for public participation? Even more telling, they’ve announced no events will be held there except weddings. See the pattern here? The decision to go virtual under the guise of "fear" is nothing more than a strategic move to stop the inevitable pushback and anger they knew would erupt once the renovations started. Instead of relocating to a more accessible venue to ensure continued public engagement, they used fear as a cover to shut down opposition. There was—and still is—absolutely no legitimate reason to go virtual. This isn’t about safety; it’s about avoiding accountability and silencing the public's voice. The timing is no coincidence. Public frustration with council’s decisions has been mounting, and residents have been showing up to voice their concerns. This shift to virtual meetings conveniently ensures fewer residents can hold their leaders accountable, while council continues to push their narrative uninterrupted. To make matters worse, rumors are circulating that other municipalities and levels of government, inspired by the ease with which Pickering has silenced dissent, may follow suit. Imagine the vacations our councillors could take while attending meetings from the comfort of a beach chair, all while avoiding accountability and criticism. And let’s not forget the bigger agenda at play. The council’s manufactured fear aligns perfectly with their push to change the Municipal Act, giving themselves the power to remove elected officials who don’t fall in line. By smearing critics as extremists or conspiracy theorists, they’re laying the groundwork for a system where disagreement is punished and democracy is replaced with dictatorship. This isn’t leadership—it’s authoritarianism, disguised as governance. Pickering’s residents deserve better—much, much better. We deserve leaders who show up to work, who actually listen to us, and who are willing to be held accountable. We deserve leaders who prioritize fixing our crumbling infrastructure over wasting millions on unnecessary renovations. If you haven’t taken a good look at the schematics for your shiny new council chambers, I strongly suggest you do so. You’ll be shocked to see that staff have pushed through a design that looks more like a courtroom than a place where your voice should be heard. The focus will now be on the Mayor and two unelected bureaucrats—the CAO and the City Clerk—staring down at you. So, ask yourself: who’s really running the show at the Corporation of the City of Pickering? You will no longer be able to look your elected representatives in the eye—the very people you voted for to be your voice in the chamber. This isn’t democracy, folks. It’s a mockery of it. Pickering deserves leaders who value transparency and public engagement over propaganda, fear-mongering, and control. The people of Pickering are speaking up because they are tired of being silenced. It’s time for our leaders to start listening instead of hiding behind virtual screens, excessive police presence, and manufactured fear. Democracy doesn’t thrive on control and censorship—it thrives on debate, dissent, and accountability. This farce must end. I am Councillor Lisa Robinson, The People’s Councillor

Why North Americans Are Overweight

Why North Americans Are Overweight By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Dr. Richard Z. Cheng, Editor-in-Chief of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, reports that years ago hunters survived eating low-carbohydrate diets. Their food was rich in animal protein, along with berries and seeds. But often food was scarce, and hunters used any bodily fat reserves to survive. There was no becoming obese. Now, food companies offer high-carbohydrate foods, with too much sugar and too many calories. Half of North Americans are overweight, with many people suffering diseases such as type 2 diabetes and its expensive medical complications. I interviewed Dr. Cheng to get his views on dietary measures that have a chance to reverse this disastrous situation. He promotes nutritious diets that are low in carbs, ultra-processed foods, and (omega-6 rich) seed oils which are also ultra-processed. He also reminds people that plants are full of self-defensive toxins that may be harmful to humans, if eaten in excess. A low-carb diet includes all types of meat and fish. Add, eggs, hard and soft cheeses, leafy vegetables, fruits and seeds. Fruit is healthy, but only in moderation, given the high sugar content. In contrast, a high-carb diet includes grains, bread, pasta, and root vegetables. Pizza, mac and cheese, muffins, fries, cakes, brownies and ice cream are high carb food. This diet of high-calorie and high-sugar foods leads to weight gain. Over time, following a high-carb diet is associated with chronic inflammation. Inflammation is a red flag that the body in not in good health. It increases the risk of big killers such as heart attack, hypertension, and stroke. Today 50 percent of Type 2 diabetes cases are due to excess pounds. Diabetes doesn’t happen overnight. The bodily process of managing excess dietary sugar demands more insulin to control blood sugar levels. Over time, insulin becomes less effective. Finally, unless medical treatment begins, people develop type 2 diabetes. It’s the leading cause of blindness in those over age 60. It also why year after year more people are requiring renal dialysis, or kidney transplant, and falling victim to heart attack. There is some good news. Dr. Cheng stressed that by changing to a low carb diet many medical metabolic functions would improve. For instance, our body’s cells contain what are called mitochondria that provide energy at the molecular level. It’s one reason why we have good days and bad ones. Cheng says that a low-carb diet enhances the performance of mitochondria. The diet also reduces inflammation in the brain and has been used to treat epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease. Many factors start people on the path to obesity. A low carb diet is a first step to stop this pandemic that gets worse year after year. It must also be stressed again and again that home needs a bathroom scale that should be stepped on every day. Use of a calorie counter shows the huge number of calories in some foods. Finally, people must use their two legs for exercise! I have great respect for orthomolecular medicine. It was because of the research of Dr. Linus Pauling that, following a heart attack at 74 years of age, I declined cholesterol-lowering drugs with their many side effects and potential for medical complications. Rather, I’ve been taking 10,000 milligrams daily of vitamin C for 28 years. I’m convinced this is why I’m entering my 102nd year. I’ve followed a sound lifestyle with no weight gain, moderate exercise, and I avoid sugar like the plague. My cardiologist was not amused. But for a quarter of a century, I have avoided the complications of synthetic drugs. Natural remedies like vitamin C have never killed anyone! Visit my website, www.docgiff.com, to learn more. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Dragon Slippers

Dragon Slippers By Wayne & Tamara I need you to help me because I feel like I'm going insane. It has to do with my sister and her boyfriend. She's been with him for nine years and living a lie ever since. He's been unfaithful to her since the beginning of the relationship and continues to do her wrong. When times get hard, he runs out on her. She has a daughter from a previous marriage and one with him. He plays in a rock band and never has time for them. He stays out every weekend and says he has a show, when in actuality he is with another woman. He has girls text messaging him and she's seen what they say to him, yet she covers for him and says it's nothing. Her children are suffering because she doesn't pay attention to their needs. Just a few weeks ago, he tells her he's leaving her again and moves in with another woman. Then he texts how miserable he is without her and how much he loves her. I know she will take him back, and I think it will be the last straw for me. I love her with all my heart, but I worry more about what she is doing to the children. She acts as if she can't live without him and will put up with anything--lying, cheating, disrespect--just so he won't leave her. What can I do to help her see the light? Bernadette Bernadette, there are only three things you can do. First, you can be the best aunt to your sister's children that you can be. Second, accept that your sister is in an abusive relationship. For some reason, she is willing to put up with this behavior. You don't understand that reason, but it has great power over her. So to gain more understanding, and possibly be of help, start reading about abuse and contact organizations for abused women. One question outsiders always have is, How can an otherwise smart, capable woman put up with abuse? "Dragonslippers," a book by Rosalind Penfold, provides an answer. Roz Penfold was in such a relationship for 10 years. She kept a diary, and when words failed her, she drew pictures. The book is a graphic portrait of abuse. Many women like Roz ease into abuse one small step at a time and use common ideas in our culture to justify what they are doing--turning the other cheek, forgiving the other, accepting bad behavior as a disease. It is a truism that a woman with an abusive man will not leave that situation until she sees things in the particular light which will make her change. For one woman, it might be consideration of the children--their suffering, their future, their well-being. For another woman, it might be understanding that she seeks abuse because she feels unworthy of anything better. For a third woman, it might be a vision of her own future. In dealing with your sister and her family you must be totally honest. If your sister praises her boyfriend, let her know everyone knows exactly what he is like and how he fails as a man. Don't go along with any imaginary or delusional way she presents his behavior. Let her children know that a good man does not treat a woman this way, and that a woman should never put up with this sort of treatment. In short, educate them to your way--the proper way--to view their home life. Finally, realize she may never change, and there may be nothing you can do to cause her to change. An accident of birth has linked the two of you as sisters. Just as you cannot allow alcoholic and drug-based behavior, or criminal behavior, or abusive behavior to dominate your life, so you cannot allow her self-demeaning life to ruin your own. Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

CANADA LACKS LEADERSHIP IN THE WAKE OF TRUMP’S 25 PER CENT TARIFF THREATS

CANADA LACKS LEADERSHIP IN THE WAKE OF TRUMP’S 25 PER CENT TARIFF THREATS By Sami Parvez Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation as leader of the Liberal Party on Jan. 6, 2025, while remaining in office until a new leader is chosen. Trudeau also asked Governor General Mary Simon to prorogue, or suspend, Parliament until March 24, a request she approved. The Liberal Party is set to select its new leader on March 9. "This country deserves a real choice in the next election, and it's become clear to me that if I'm having to fight internal battles, I cannot be the best option in that election," 53-year-old prime minister said during a press conference on Jan. 6. Although Justin Trudeau repeatedly assured the Canadians he would lead the Liberals into the next election, pressure mounted after the party lost a safe seat in Toronto to the Conservatives and another in Montreal to the Bloc Québécois. Despite these setbacks, Trudeau insisted he would remain at the helm, with some caucus members publicly saying he was the best choice to lead the party into the next election. Former Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Crystia Freeland's sudden departure further destabilized Trudeau's leadership team on Dec. 16. While the Governor General's approval of proroguing Parliament surprised some observers, many Canadians are grappling with significant challenges. Millions are turning to food banks amidst an unemployment crisis, housing shortages, and a strained healthcare system. Rising crime rates and recent arrests of several terrorists have added to the public's anxiety. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump has been critical of border security and illegal migration, specifically concerning migrants crossing from Canada to the U.S. Trump has also raised concerns about fentanyl trafficking and its links to cross-border migration. On Nov. 30, Trudeau secretly flew to Florida and met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate to discuss Canada-U.S. relations. "It was a pleasure to have dinner the other night with Governor Justin Trudeau of the Great State of Canada. I look forward to seeing the Governor again soon so that we may continue our in depth talks on Tariffs and Trade, the results of which will be truly spectacular for all!" Trump said in a post on social media after meeting with his Canadian counterpart on Nov. 30. This is not the first time Trump has threatened to impose tariffs, having done so during his first term. With U.S. tariffs looming, many feel Canada’s internal leadership struggles, including the uncertainty surrounding Trudeau's resignation and proroguing Parliament have made it difficult for Canada to respond to Trump’s economic pressures effectively. “We are thinking in terms of 25 per cent on Mexico and Canada because they are allowing vast number of people, Canada is a very bad abuser also, vast numbers of people to come in and fentanyl to come in,” Trump told reporters on Jan. 20 during his first media address after taking office. As the Liberal Party works to choose its new leader, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre continues to call for a national election. Public opinion polls show that many Canadians believe an election is needed to restore stability to the country. In the meantime, Trump’s remarks at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Jan. 23 added fuel to the fire. He said U.S. does not need Canadian energy, vehicles, or lumber, further complicating Canada’s ability to navigate its economic relationship with the U.S. "We’re going to be demanding respect from other nations. Canada. We have a tremendous deficit with Canada. We're not going to have that anymore," Trump said speaking via video conference. During a Jan. 21 press conference, Trudeau emphasized Canada’s commitment to avoiding tariffs but warned of a strong, measured response should they be imposed on Feb. 1. He added: "Our response will be robust, rapid, and measured, but very strong. The goal will be to get those tariffs off as quickly as possible, and in order to do that, everything is on the table." “Everything is on the table, and I support the principle of dollar-for-dollar matching tariffs, Trudeau told the reporters. “It's something we're absolutely going to be looking at if they move forward. We are prepared for every possible scenario.” Canada’s border policies under Trudeau have faced criticism for being too lenient, creating vulnerabilities. Recent high-profile arrests, including individuals crossing the border illegally, have heightened public concerns about national security. Even a terrorist involved in a beheading in Syria was granted admission to Canada in 2018, becoming a Canadian citizen last year May, who was arrested in Toronto in June. Another Pakistani student was arrested in Quebec near the US-Canada border while crossing illegally to carry out a massacre on Oct. 7, 2024, the first anniversary of the Hamas terrorist attack that killed dozens of civilians and wounded many attending the Nova music festival in Israel. In 2017, when Trump announced travel bans on several countries, Trudeau sent out a famous tweet saying, “Welcome to Canada,” which cost Canadian taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars as thousands of people crossed illegally through Roxham Road in Quebec. In tariff wars, there will be no winner; only consumers on both sides of the border will bear the cost. The way the Liberal government handles these challenges, once the effects are felt, will be crucial. Moreover, it will be interesting to see how Trudeau's successor navigates the evolving relationship with the new U.S. administration. Ultimately, Canada needs a true leader who will prioritize the nation's interests, put Canada first, and stand firm in the face of any consequences.

The Home Evaluation

The Home Evaluation By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist The negotiation between the purchaser and seller of a property is a crucial part of the real estate transaction. This is a stage of the transaction that has also changed greatly over the years. It used to be at one time, albeit many years ago, that a home would be listed for sale and regardless of the price it was listed at, it would yield an offer several thousand dollars under asking. It usually sold under asking as well. That was just normal for the time. As the population grew and more and more people got into the housing market, we started to see a shift in how the real estate transaction played out. People were willing to pay more for a house that they really wanted, so they began offering the seller exactly what the seller was asking and sometimes they would offer more. For sellers, this was a real treat as this was not usually the case. Fast forward 2020 and Covid-19. This is a time period that changed real estate, perhaps forever. The Covid-19 time period was such a new and untested time for everyone. Real estate professionals didn’t know what to expect, and I don’t think anyone expected the near insanity that ensued. Indeed, the way real estate was transacted had changed. In the past, if you saw a property that you liked and wanted to purchase, you simply had your agent write up an offer for you. The deal was negotiated and you either settled on agreed terms or you didn’t. Some agents absolutely love the negotiation phase of the transaction while others do not. This is where you really need your agent to stand out and secure for you, the very best deal there is to be had. If you are the buyer, you want your agent to get you that house well under asking. If you are the seller, you want your agent to get you every dollar you are asking for or more. The negotiation however comes down to more than just price. The three major components of the negotiation are price, deposit, and closing date. Sometimes a closing date can derail what otherwise looks like a very good offer. The deposit is also very important as it shows the seller that you are very serious in your offer. Sometimes a higher deposit can secure a deal that doesn’t necessarily measure up in other areas. An experienced and skilled agent will look forward to and go into negotiations with enthusiasm and confidence. This is very important. You are trusting them to negotiate on your behalf, perhaps the biggest transaction of your life. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

Durham MP calls for protection of Christians in Canada

Durham MP calls for protection of Christians in Canada By Sami Parvez In May 2024, Jamal Jivani, 37, was elected as the member of Parliament for Durham in a by-election, replacing former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole, who stepped down in August 2023. Jivani has been a vocal for protecting Christians and their rights in Canada. In a video posted on X (formerly Twitter), Durham MP Jamal Jivani called on Canadians to sign a petition addressing what he described as government inaction in the face of increasing threats to Christian communities. In Canada, Christians are facing backlash while the government turns a blind eye. This comes despite more than 19.3 million Canadians identifying as Christian—53 per cent of the population, according to the 2021 census. "I'm sounding the alarm,” Jivani said in the video posted on X. “We need to do more to protect Christians in Canada,” The MP’s call comes amidst growing concerns over vandalism and arson targeting churches, as well as debates surrounding religious freedoms and parental rights and growing influence of the LGBTQ2S+ movement. Jivani criticized the federal government in a video posted on X, for its perceived failure to address these issues, questioning its commitment to safeguarding Christian heritage. He also raised alarm over what he described as a “crime spree” targeting places of worship, emphasizing the need to protect the freedom of expression for Christian churches. Durham MP expressed concerns in his video about the federal government's failure to defend parental rights and Christian values. He emphasized the need to protect mothers and fathers, conscience rights for workers, and to address crimes targeting churches, such as arson and vandalism. It is uncommon for a Muslim MP to advocate for the protection of Christianity, as Muslims rarely speak out on behalf of other religious groups, particularly Christians. Some Islamic scholars argue that saying "Merry Christmas" implies endorsing the belief that "God has a son," which conflicts with Islamic teachings. For this reason, they consider it prohibited, as it is seen as celebrating the son of God. Christianity has been under threat in Canada since Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took office, with the Christmas season increasingly referred to as the holiday season. In 2021, the discovery of unmarked graves at former residential school sites sparked national outrage, leading to more than 100 churches being burned or vandalized. At the time, Trudeau told media, “I understand the anger that’s out there against the federal government, against institutions like the Catholic Church. It is real and it’s fully understandable, given the shameful history that we are all becoming more and more aware of and engaging ourselves to do better as Canadians.” In 2009, Durham Region experienced a troubling rise in church vandalism and arson, affecting historic and cherished landmarks. All Saints’ Anglican Church in Whitby, a 144-year-old structure, faced repeated vandalism before being destroyed by a suspicious fire, with damages estimated at $2-3 million. Investigators found a gas canister at the scene. Similarly, St. Philip the Apostle Catholic Church in Oshawa was ravaged by a Christmas Day fire with multiple points of origin, suspected to be motivated by religious bigotry. These attacks left congregations grappling with emotional pain, financial strain, and displacement, highlighting the urgent need for community vigilance. “Now when you see a Christmas tree like this in Parliament you might think that's a sign of respect for Christians,” Durham MP said in the video. “But what good is a Christmas tree here in Parliament when you have a federal government that will not lift a finger to protect Christians from governments and corporations abusing their power?” According to the International Prayer Connect (IPC), a global network of over 4,500 Christian prayer and mission networks and organizations, in 2019, Trudeau told Pastor Steve Long, a Canadian Baptist minister, 'Evangelical Christians were the worst part of Canadian society.” The remark continues to fuel distrust among Evangelical groups toward Trudeau's government." “We have to stop the crime spree targeting churches including arson and vandalism,” Conservative MP added in the video. “And we need to defend the legal status of Christian Charities and the freedom of expression of Christian churches.” “This is not about forcing other people to live according to Christian values no this is about whether Christians in Canada have the freedom to live according to their own traditions and to practice their own faith without corporations and governments engaging in overreach.” Durham MP is urging Canadians to take action by signing a petition on one of his sites. The petition, aimed at protecting Christian rights and heritage, will be presented at an event in Ottawa in February 2025. “This is not about forcing others to live according to Christian values,” Jivani said in the video. “This is about whether Christians in Canada have the freedom to live according to their own traditions and practice their faith without corporations and governments overreaching.” Jivani emphasized the need to stop crimes targeting churches and defend the legal status of Christian charities, urging Canadians to stand united in protecting their rights and freedoms.

Ontario's Solar Panel Promise: Why Did It Lose Its Shine?

Ontario's Solar Panel Promise: Why Did It Lose Its Shine? By Dale Jodoin Once upon a time, Ontario promised a greener future. The government introduced the Feed-In Tariff (FIT) and microFIT programs, which encouraged homeowners and businesses to install solar panels on their rooftops. The dream was simple: generate clean energy, reduce dependency on oil, and earn money by feeding electricity back into the grid. But today, many feel betrayed. What went wrong? A Promising Start In the early days, the Ontario government offered significant financial incentives for those who participated. Homeowners could earn as much as 80.2 cents per kilowatt-hour of electricity generated. For many, this was a no-brainer. Solar panels became a symbol of hope—a chance for individuals to fight climate change while earning extra income. However, as years went by, the shine of this promise dulled. By 2017, the payments had been slashed to as low as 19.2 cents per kilowatt-hour. The program itself was discontinued, leaving thousands who invested in solar panels wondering why the government had changed course. Broken Promises and Angry Homeowners For people like Sarah Clarke of Oshawa, the program was more than just an investment; it was a commitment to a greener future. "I believed in it," she said. "I wanted to do my part, but now I’m stuck with a leaky roof from the solar panels, and there’s no help to fix it. Sarah isn’t alone. Many homeowners who took part in the program now face expensive repairs. Solar panels can cause roofing issues, and without the financial benefits initially promised, homeowners feel abandoned. "We trusted the government," Sarah said. "Now they’ve moved on, and we’re left with the mess." Cheaper Panels, Higher Costs The solar panel industry has also changed dramatically. Panels manufactured in China have made solar installations more affordable, but there’s a catch. The Canadian government has imposed tariffs on some imported goods, including solar panels, which could drive up prices. Critics argue this will increase costs for those who want to install panels in the future. "If the government wants us to go green, why are they making it harder and more expensive?" asked Sarah. "They talk about green energy all the time, but where’s the support for people like us who took the leap years ago?" The Shift Away from Rooftop Solar The Ontario government has shifted its focus to other green energy initiatives, such as large-scale solar farms and energy efficiency programs. While these efforts aim to address climate change on a broader scale, they leave individual homeowners feeling left out. "The FIT program made us feel like we were part of the solution," Sarah said. "Now, we’re just ignored." The Bigger Picture Ontario’s shift reflects a broader trend in green energy policy. Governments are moving away from small-scale initiatives in favor of larger projects that are easier to manage and more cost-effective. But for people like Sarah, this shift feels like a betrayal. "We did what they asked us to do," she said. "We believed in the green dream. But now they’ve taken it away and left us with nothing." What’s Next for Solar in Ontario? The rising cost of solar panels, combined with the lack of support for homeowners, has left many wondering if the promise of green energy was ever genuine. Critics argue the government has talked a good game about climate change but failed to deliver meaningful support for individuals who want to make a difference. "The government loves to talk about green energy," Sarah said. "But it feels like it’s all talk. Where’s the action? Where’s the help for people like me?" The dream of a solar-powered Ontario hasn’t disappeared, but for many, it feels out of reach. Homeowners who embraced the government’s vision of rooftop solar feel abandoned, stuck with costly repairs and dwindling financial benefits. If Ontario is serious about green energy, it must do more than talk. It must listen to people like Sarah Clarke and provide the support they need—not just for the future, but for the promises made in the past. Until then, the shine of Ontario’s solar promise will remain dimmed.

The Home Inspection

By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist Is a home inspection really necessary and if so, what should I expect from one? The home inspection plays a pivotal role in the purchase of any home, even new homes. A home inspection is important for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is to determine whether or not the home is sound. On a recent home inspection visit, the inspector sent out a pre inspection list just prior to the visit which listed the items that are checked during a home inspection as well as confirmation of who would be present during the inspection. All parties met at the house at the agreed time and were introduced to the inspector. The home inspector brought all of his own tools and set immediately about his routine. We were told that along with actual testing of certain things and the general looking and gauging, there would be pictures of everything along with explanations for the purchasers upon completion. The big-ticket items were checked of course, the roof, foundation, plumbing, wiring HVAC system. Other things that were also included were things like the windows, fencing, porch, patio, and garage. I was pleasantly surprised to see in the report things like loose handrail, noisy range hood. These were things that were evident when using or turning on. I felt it made the report more comprehensive. At the end of the inspection, the home inspector came into the kitchen where the family of the purchasers were, and went through everything he had noted, albeit briefly. The complete and comprehensive report would follow with photos of everything along with explanations. This was just a courtesy given that the family was there. At the end of his summary, he asked the family if anyone had any questions. The parents of both purchasers had questions. The Inspector took his time and answered in detail. The purchasers came away very happy with the inspection. The inspection did not uncover anything that was not readily seen to someone walking through the house. In this particular case, the inspection was not used to negotiate a better price due to needed repairs or anything like that which can be the case in some instances. Later that day the purchasers advised that they had received a digital file with numerous pictures and explanations of what they were looking at. The inspection in this case was just over two hours but some are three hours plus. This depends a great deal on whether or not the inspector can gain access to certain areas. While you are covered under the Terrion warranty in the province of Ontario for brand new builds, some home buyers still insist on a home inspection. A home inspection in Durham Region will run you anywhere from $400-600 but is well worth it for peace of mind, and is always recommended by any reputable Realtor. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

2025 Job Market: What Is Not Changing

By Nick Kossovan The phrase "resistance is futile"—commonly associated with the Borgs, fictional aliens who are recurring antagonists in the Star Trek franchise—is one job seekers would be wise to heed. Every day, I see job seekers spending (read: wasting) time and energy fighting against core principles and human behaviour truisms that aren't budging anytime soon. Thanks to technological advancements, shifting economic and geopolitical landscapes, and generational adjustments in the workplace, today's job market is brutal. Job searching, hiring, and employee experience aren't what they once were. However, some aspects haven't and won't be changing, regardless of how much you wish they would. Therefore, it's wise to accept that employers operate within certain universal truths and changes in norms have re-defined the concept of professionalism. Profitability is an employer's top priority. Ultimately, businesses exist to make a profit. Regardless of what happens in 2025 and beyond, this core principle of capitalism will remain constant. This is why the most effective approach to landing a job is to show and articulate to employers what most job seekers don't: how you’ll impact the company's profitability. Why should an employer hire you if you aren't going to add measurable value to their business? No numbers = No value to employers Identify ways to quantify your achievements (increased, decreased, improved, saved, handled, collected, processed) and present your achievement numbers—numbers are the language of business—to demonstrate the value you added to your previous employers. Your LinkedIn profile is paramount in your job search and career. Your LinkedIn profile isn't just an online résumé; it's your 24/7/365 personal billboard. When done right, it's an around-the-clock employer magnet. Your LinkedIn profile needs to provide compelling reasons why an employer should hire you, which starts with, as I pointed out, presenting your results using numbers. More than ever, employers are turning to LinkedIn to find candidates—rather than posting jobs and weeding through hundreds of resumes, most of which won't meet the qualifications—vet their qualifications and evaluate their professional demeanour. Because of its far-reaching visibility, your LinkedIn profile is much more important than your resume, which is only seen by those you share it with. Having a polished, up-to-date LinkedIn profile is non-negotiable. Ensure your profile has a professional headshot, a captivating headline, and a summary showcasing your skills, experiences, and accomplishments. Engage with industry-related content and regularly update your profile to reflect new skills and experiences to keep yourself visible and position yourself as a professional in your field. Having a professional network The adage "It's not what you know, but who you know" will always be a truism. People serious about their career cultivate a professional network through which they can learn about job openings, industry trends, and potential mentors. Make 2025 the year you attend industry conferences, join relevant professional organizations, and actively engage on LinkedIn and other social media platforms. TIP: Networking is about forming relationships and providing value to others; it's not about seeking anything. When meeting someone for the first time, ask yourself, "How can I help this person?" Being a SME (Subject Matter Expert) Employers love experts, especially experts with a track record of producing results. Due to the increasing compartmentalization of work, SMEs—professionals with deep knowledge in specific areas—are increasingly in demand. SME status enhances your employability dramatically. Becoming a Subject Matter Expert (SME) is not an overnight achievement, but it's a journey worth taking as it'll significantly enhance your employability. It starts with investing time in continuous learning, attending workshops, obtaining certifications, and keeping up with industry trends. Then, share your knowledge and insights through articles, presentations, social media, and actively participating in online discussions. Maintaining a positive mindset Job searching can be daunting and disheartening. However, maintaining a positive mindset is essential. Employers favour candidates who will contribute positively to their culture. When you cultivate and maintain a positive mindset, you become more likeable. Likeability is a job seeker's biggest asset. Being likeable supersedes your skills and experience. Hiring managers don't hire candidates they don't like. A sense of entitlement turns off employers. Many job seekers expect jobs to be handed to them because they have a degree or some experience. This "I'm owed!" belief is why most job seekers have a frustrating job search. Focus on what you can offer an employer. Show your willingness to adapt, learn, and contribute to the employer's success. Understandably, employers gravitate towards candidates who show initiative and a strong work ethic over those who expect to be given opportunities. Ghosting is part of job searching. The "Tinder" generation dominates recruitment; therefore, save your breath. Ghosting, where employers cease all communication without explanation, is here to stay. Accept that being ghosted means you didn't get the job. You don't own your job; your employer does. Ever since an employer created a job—around 3,000 BCE in ancient Mesopotamia, a Sumerian named Kesh is believed to have been the first paid employee—jobs have been owned by employers, not employees. Layoffs highlight this fact, which is why it's wise to maintain a nimble and proactive approach to your career. Navigating 2025's job market will require: · Accepting what you can't control. · Focusing on creating and maintaining a professional network. · Being that rare candidate who demonstrates how they'll enhance profits—the reason the employer exists. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

The End of the Second Trudeau Era

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The New Year 2025 has brought us interesting surprises. There was the announcement made on the 6th of January by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that he intends to hand in his resignation as the Liberal Party Leader. This was an interesting day, automatically making us think about what happened on the same day in 2020 in the United States, even though something different was in our minds. The announcement of the Prime Minister was made on the same day that the Parliament of Canada was prorogued until 24th of March. The resignation of the Prime Minister also initiated a leadership action in the Liberal Party of Canada in order to choose a leader capable of withstanding the pressure from the Conservative Party of Canada, the official opposition. By now, we have seen that many polls indicate a commanding two digit lead by the Conservative Party, which means that if an election were called today, they would win a majority of seats in parliament. The governing Liberals have few options looking forward. An election has to be called soon; either in the late spring or in the early fall at the latest, because all the major opposition parties in parliament are ready to topple the minority government. Looking at the candidates in the Liberal leadership race, though we are in the early stages, there is more and more talk about the entrance of Mark Carney into the leadership race. If Carney, former Chairman of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, is elected, he will present a real challenge to the leader of the Conservative Party, Pierre Poilievre. Let us be clear. The Justin Trudeau era began with his rebuilding the Liberal Party and, in the 2015 election, bringing it to power. His ascent to power was also made possible by the inability of the Conservative Party to clearly see what was going on in the Canadian electorate. With a tired Prime Minister Harper supported by an incompetent staff dealing with the reality of the moment, the success of the Liberal Party under the Leadership of Justin Trudeau was greatly facilitated. The potential leadership of Mark Carney would put a new element into play in the upcoming election. Suddenly the Trudeau factor will no longer count and the old slogan of “killing the gas tax” associated with him is unlikely to work anymore, having been battered to death. Add to this the fact that the same staff and advisors who lost the 2015 election for Stephen Harper still have a commanding influence; an interesting election looms on the horizon. It will be a Conservative Party loss rather than a Liberal win. Reflecting on the Justin Trudeau era which has just ended, we can make some interesting observations. In his early days as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau was "cool", with a majority of the youth electorate voting for him and admiring him. In the year that followed his majority sweep into power, he appeared in the pages of Vogue, on the cover of a Marvel comic book and other important media. He really created a movement in 2015 and he got a lot of young people engaged. However, the same people are asking for change today, and looking for a different leader, having lost confidence in him for not delivering his promise of a better life. Elections Canada data from the 2015 election showed that 57 per cent of voters aged 18 to 24 cast a ballot, an increase of 18.3 percentage points from the almost 39 per cent recorded in the 2011 election. Research conducted by Abacus Data following the 2015 vote suggested Liberals won the support of 45 per cent of young voters. Let’s face it, Canadians had a kind of parasocial relationship with Trudeau at the time. He had grown up in the public eye because of his father, former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, so people felt like they knew him. However, reality checked in, and the image started to fade. It all started in 2018 when Trudeau and his family took a much-ridiculed trip to India. They were photographed, over and over again, wearing clothes more appropriate for a wedding than a state visit. Then people started seeing it as: he's a bit of a phoney, and all of a sudden, some people were able to move from giving him the benefit of the doubt to realizing that instead of being authentic, he was actually manipulating them. Then, over time, the disconnect between promise and delivery broadened and that becomes a fundamental problem when you are dealing with a brand: the Trudeau brand. As a brand, Justin Trudeau was failing on a lot of promises because he was creating expectations that he was not fulfilling. He was dogged by a litany of scandals, from the SNC-Lavalin affair that saw two female cabinet ministers -- justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and health minister Jane Philpott -- resign, to the surfacing of old photos and video of Trudeau wearing black- and brown-face. Trudeau didn't live up to his feminist, culturally sensitive promise. Although Canadians re-elected Trudeau in 2019, he was knocked down to a minority government. The Liberals were unable to regain a majority in 2021. Therefore, Canada is in real turmoil on the brink of the crucial take over by President Trump’s Administration. It will be interesting to follow the quick succession of events that are to come. Let us hope that Canadian politicians will be able to navigate these dangerous high seas in the interest of preserving the very existence of Canada.