Heart Disease Prevention Begins with Children and Good Parenting

By Common Sense Health – W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Heart disease is called the “silent killer”. Why? Because the first symptom can be a fatal attack. Most people lead their lives unaware of the ticking time bomb within, neglecting lifestyle changes that could radically reduce the risk. The fact is, preventing heart disease needs to be a lifelong practice, starting in childhood. Pediatric cardiologists and researchers who focus on identifying and mitigating risk factors for cardiovascular disease in children and young adults are proving the case. Studies show that obese children have higher levels of insulin resistance and inflammation than their non-obese peers, both of which are known risk factors for heart disease. Obese children also have stiffer arteries, which can lead to high blood pressure and other cardiovascular problems. But heart health among children can begin even earlier in their lives, including before birth. Long before childhood obesity becomes a risk factor for heart disease, low birth weight, maternal smoking during pregnancy, and childhood exposure to environmental toxins are a concern. In one study, children who were exposed to second-hand smoke had higher levels of atherosclerosis, or the buildup of plaque in the arteries associated with cardiovascular disease, than children who were not exposed. The list of health problems caused by second-hand smoke is already a mile long. Adding increased risk of cardiovascular disease for children may not get the headlines this research finding deserves. But any adult neglecting to keep kids safe from smoke is guilty of the kind of child abuse that lasts a lifetime. Cholesterol is another common consideration in cardiovascular disease. While cholesterol is often associated with older adults, it is also an important factor in the development of heart disease in children and young adults. In another study, researchers found that children and young adults with elevated levels of LDL cholesterol, or "bad" cholesterol, were more likely to develop atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular problems. They also found that reducing LDL cholesterol levels through diet and medication can significantly reduce the risk of heart disease. There are important implications of this research for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in children and young adults. By identifying and mitigating risk factors early in life, it may be possible to prevent the development of heart disease later on. To combat childhood obesity, the recommendation is a multifaceted approach that includes healthy eating, regular exercise, avoiding exposure to environmental toxins such as second-hand smoke, and behavioral interventions, with an emphasis on starting early. But there are a few fundamental problems. One, infants and young children have no capacity to lobby for their health. They are utterly dependent on their caregivers and the environment in which they live. Two, young people tend to feel immortal. They willfully indulge in high levels of risk. Three, by the time mid-life arrives, it’s often too late to erase the cumulative negative health impacts of poor lifestyle. So for loving parents and grandparents everywhere: what might be the best birthday and holiday gifts for the youngsters in your family? Skip the sugary soft drinks, cakes and ice cream. Instead, make a photograph album of healthy, active centenarians and include the recipe for how to make it to 100+. There is an abundance of Gifford-Jones articles that could be included too – available at www.docgiff.com – arguably the best free advice of all! But we shouldn’t be making light of the situation. Here in North America, and sadly around the world too, we are currently getting this one very wrong. Make no mistake about it, global childhood obesity rates are on the rise. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Statement from Mayor Adrian Foster on 2024-2027 budget

Mayor Adrian Foster By Clarington Mayor Adrian Foster

Clarington, Ontario – Clarington Mayor Adrian Foster has issued the following statement on the Municipality’s first multi-year budget. “I want to make something very clear: Clarington residents are getting a good deal on their property taxes. Compared to other nearby municipalities, Clarington has provided, and continues to provide, similar services at a significantly lower cost to the taxpayers. Earlier this week, Clarington’s first four-year budget was adopted. I believe it is important to clarify how these figures impact your property tax bill. Clarington’s budget increase translates to about $67 per year for the average household. Clarington’s annual budget increase will be 4.2 per cent, on average, per year from 2024 to 2027. The 4.2 per cent is the annual increase to Clarington’s total municipal budget, not your individual property tax bill. Clarington’s portion of your tax bill is about one-third of the total amount you pay. Clarington’s budget increase will result in a 1.5 per cent increase to your total property tax bill, or $67 more a year for the average home. The Region of Durham, which will also impact your tax bill, has yet to pass their budget. If we compare to our municipal neighbours, Oshawa's 2024 budget increase will result in approximately $82 more for Oshawa’s median house assessment value. In an effort to offer full transparency to our residents, we will compare and release the dollar amount increases between Clarington and other Durham municipalities as they set their 2024 budgets in the new year. Clarington now, and historically, has had amongst the lowest property taxes in Durham Region. Clarington is leading the way with a multi-year budget that provides residents stability and predictability over four years. I am confident that our budget will support and enhance the amazing quality of life we enjoy in our community, now and into the future.”

KEEPING YOU INFORMED

By Maurice Brenner Deputy Mayor/Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering Potential Crisis Faces Homeless and Food Deprive As Christmas is quickly coming, the needs of the Homeless and those that are food deprive could never be greater and once again Municipalities who are grass roots will need to find the funds to fill the financial voids. In Durham Region, data shows a 67 per cent increase in people experiencing unsheltered homelessness over the past year. Regional Staff have been meeting regularly with counterparts across the GTHA, sharing best practices and approaches to service delivery, and collaborate advocacy efforts for additional funding and policy changes at both the Provincial and Federal levels of Government. While funding announcements are appreciated, when you compare the reductions in funding compared to an increasing population that are and will experience homelessness, Municipalities will face a serious funding crisis that is not sustainable, with pressures increasing as Shelter Capacity decreases along with a lack of available affordable housing. A recent report presented to Durham Region Health and Social Services compared the current level of funding and how it will decrease by 2028. Based on current trends, the need will continue to increase while funding decreases and unless the Upper Tiers at the very least maintain current levels of funding, more and more will find themselves on the street which is why the Health and Social Services Committee past unanimously a motion to pressure both the Province and the Federal Government to reverse these reductions. Current Funding 2023-2024 - $4,956,872 New Allocations 2024-2025 - $ 4666,872 2025-2026 - $ 4666,872 2026-2027- $ 940,221 2027-2028 - $ 940,221 Side by side with the increasing numbers of those finding themselves homeless is the growing numbers of those who turn to Food banks. A snap shot of the City of Pickering and the St Paul’s On the Hill Food Bank, which like so many other Food Banks is a volunteer based organization who is struggling to keep up with demands. Over the past year demand for services has increased 41.63% as a result of an erosion of social support programs and the lack of affordable housing. From January 1st to November 30th 2023, they served 26,704 individuals including 9,298 children compared to 18,854 individuals for the same time period in 2022. On average each month 65 new families turn to the food bank with a majority family size of 6 or more. St Pauls on the Hill has reached out to Pickering and has requested emergency funding to get them through the Christmas Season with a $8763.52 financial support to cover the cost on increasing rent in the storage unit (4,511.27 of that amount will be used for rent cost for December and the other $4,252.2 will be used to purchase the milk and eggs distributed to our clients for December. The amount for the milk and eggs is based off November’s expense. While I am confident that this will be supported by Pickering Council, we will need to look at a more sustainable solution to ensure that no is food deprived not just in December but all year.

The dark side

The Dark Side of Universal Change Rooms: Safety, Voyeurism, and Mental Health Concerns “The current trend” of implementing universal change rooms in various provinces has sparked controversy and raised concerns over issues such as voyeurism, sexual assaults, and mental health. While the intention behind these inclusive spaces is commendable, it is essential to critically examine the unintended consequences and the impact they have on individuals, particularly children. The City of Pickering recently sent out a video via social media outlining all the reasons why they believe the Chestnut Hill Development Recreation Centre’s Universal Changeroom is, pardon the pun, fitting. The video mentions that the Universal change room uses signs posted in various areas, as a deterrent to remind people to keep clothes and bathing suits on at all times, notably while using the common area or the open stall showers. However, while signs serve as a visual reminder of expected behavior, they cannot guarantee compliance or prevent individuals with malicious intent from committing wrongful acts. One of the primary concerns surrounding universal change rooms is the increased vulnerability individuals face in these spaces. The absence of gender segregation can create an environment where voyeurism and sexual assaults become more prevalent. Incidents of voyeurism and inappropriate behavior have been reported, leading to a loss of privacy and a diminished sense of safety for many individuals. This poses a significant risk, particularly for children and those who have experienced trauma, as they may not feel comfortable or secure in these shared spaces. I would also like to point out that though the person in the video claims that all you can see under the doors of the stalls is someone’s feet, I can assure you that my head and most of my body can easily maneuver my way under the stall door(s), and over the stalls, leaving plenty of room for those individuals with malicious intents to easily slide their hands, feet, or possibly a gimbal stick under or over the doors making it easy for their phones or other recording devices to record potential victims while using these vulnerable spaces. Durhams recent police report noted that they posted a fake child web site wich attracted over 6,000 hits in one day soliciting child sex. Durhams most recent campaign was put forth in fight against human trafficking erecting sign along major roads. The threat here in Durham is real. Do we really need to invite the possible risk of criminal act to take place in our community recreation centres. Another important issue that was never even mentioned in Pickering’s Chestnut Hill Recreation Centre video is the psychological impact of these universal change rooms which cannot be overlooked, especially for children. Not to mention the lack of regards for cultural and religious values. The lack of respect and the pressure to conform to a specific societal agenda norm can lead to increased anxiety, stress, and impact natural cognitive development for children. Children, in particular, may find it challenging to navigate these vulnerable spaces, resulting in feelings of insecurity, discomfort, and even exclusion. It is crucial to recognize the importance of providing options that prioritize the mental well-being of individuals, particularly those who may already be struggling with mental health challenges. As a strong advocate for the people, every male and female,should have the right to make an informed decision about the spaces they feel most comfortable using. Whether they choose to use their biological changeroom or the universal changeroom which is inclusive to all, regardless of their age or membership status. While the Corporation of The City of Pickering continues to argue that Chestnut Hill Development Recreation Complex’s universal change room is safe, and promotes inclusivity and equality, it has inadvertently created increased anxiety, stress, and mental health issues amongst the community by taking away individuals right to feel safe in vulnerable spaces. Maybe Pickering could look at how Brooklyn designed their recreation center. They have biological changerooms for males and females to use regardless of their age, and instead of having a big open area, monitored by signs for the universal changerooms, they have individual rooms to be used as family/universal changerooms recognizing the importance of individual choice and autonomy. Giving everyone the right to personal privacy and personal comfort. Way to go Brooklyn.

PLEASE CALM DOWN

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - I know that many of you have called frustrated and some even very angry. All I can say is “I am sorry, we are working as fast as we can with all municipalities.” It appears that citizens are becoming very frustrated over the fact that many of the services and programs are not being advertise in the community newspaper. People are left to wonder and are demanding that notices and events be posted in the local newspaper. Some of you have called frustrated when you attempted to call your city halls. From the automated system to the staff that had no real idea of when notices and happenings in the community would be made available. Others, of all ages have expressed anger over the fact that some municipalities are re-directing citizens to their web pages. Web pages that are very complicated to navigate this further increasing the frustration. Municipalities in my opinion do not understand the science behind posting online. If you look at those that have chosen FB for example. Many of the posting have no comments or no viewers. This means that no one is viewing the posts. Others select even more complex platforms. They do this because their IT people do not truly understand their audience. First and foremost. I personally believe that it is irresponsible and arrogant for any municipality to expect citizens to go check their web sites. I say this because in this age of caring and feeling and inclusiveness. Not everyone can afford the internet. Not everyone can afford a computer. Not everyone has a smart phone. Not to mention the countless number of people out there that have limited internet or computer savvy. So what does this mean. Citizens are not getting the information they traditionally would receive from a newspaper. Those that claim that news print is dead. They do not understand the digital revolution. On the one. It is not better exposure. It is controlled exposure as if you do not have internet you can’t get information. Two, the rule of thumb for most web pages. If the viewer needs to click more than three times. The viewer lost interest. As for advertisers. Cheap means you get what you paid for. Some less experience local business owners that claim to be advertising online. Only are truly telling you they are broke and that the cheap online posting is the tip of the iceberg to what they should be attracting. Newsprint, brings the community together. For a dollar a week you have fresh copy that sits in your home. Easy flip pages and quick access to information. For those calling frustrated. Please calm down. We are on it.

Bill C-18 the Online News Act and related issues

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East As we have become accustomed to some of the ill-conceived Liberal government legislation, Bill C-18, The Online News Act, should not come as a surprise; not even the negotiations with Google. Never mind that Meta, the other giant, refused to negotiate. Bill C-18 will be in force by December 19, 2023. However, the Liberal government has announced that it has reached an agreement with Google on a deal that will ensure that news links are not blocked on the search engine, and the company pays $100 million to support the news sector in Canada. The government was ultimately able to strike the deal largely by changing the law, albeit through yet-to-be released regulations. After claiming for months that it would not get involved in negotiations and specifying in considerable detail what any deals between platforms and media companies needed to look like, the government dropped all of that and simply desperately negotiated the best deal it could get on behalf of Canadian news outlets. To be clear, this is apparently good news for all, given that the alternative was bad for news outlets, the government, Canadians, and Google. However, if we look into the details, this is hardly an example of good government policy, even if it is a far better outcome than blocked news links. Indeed, the loss of Meta from the system not only dropped the estimated benefits of Bill C-18 by $50 million, but the lost links and deals means that the actual losses run into the tens of millions of dollars. It was only a few months ago that the government said it estimated Google’s contribution alone at $170 million. There was some sense that the extra $70 million was designed to offset the Meta losses, but that was something Google was unwilling to cover. The reality is that Bill C-18 is now barely at break-even. Google’s $100 million is not all-new money. The company was already paying millions in deals for its Google Showcase program with many Canadian news outlets. Those deals will now be cancelled with the single payment replacing the other contributions. There is obviously some new money – particularly for broadcasters – but it is not the full $100 million and it must be offset by the losses sustained by the exit of Meta. Therefore, thinking rationally, Google made a good deal and the Liberal government blew it, as usual, spending a lot of time on bad legislation, for nothing. In the deal, the broadcast sector will remain the big winner, though speculation of the possible removal of the CBC from the system would increase the distributions to the remaining companies. Of course, the question remains: why should the CBC even be considered, when it already receives yearly 1.3 billion from public money? "Given concerns about public broadcasters competing with the private sector for ad dollars, to have it also compete for [Big Tech] money makes matters worse," University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist, who opposed Bill C-18, told a Senate committee studying the bill in May. Regardless, allocating the majority of the money to broadcasters presumably helps explain why the government announced a $129 million bailout that expands the available money in the labour journalism tax credit, for which only print and digital publications (known as Qualified Canadian Journalism Organizations) are eligible. The risks to the independence of the press are significant. The Canadian experience will likely serve as a cautionary tale for other countries. An example of how government and industry ignored the obvious risks of a legislative approach, ultimately leaving the government desperate for a deal to salvage something for a sector that is enormously important to a free and open democracy. Once again, the Liberal government has shown that they operate from an ivory tower and we, ordinary Canadians, have to pay for it. My question is this: When will this government start to serve Canadians, not only itself; pursuing inordinately costly, scientifically immature, Canadian environment inappropriate if not unsound, pie-in-the sky projects, like climate exchange/carbon-tax, electric vehicles (for our sub-zero temperatures and distances!!??) and attempting to syphon revenue off private businesses that are already shoring up government lackeys like the CBC? You be the judge.

HUMAN TRAFFIKING

By Dale Jodoin Human trafficking, a form of modern-day slavery, remains a grave concern worldwide, including in countries like Canada, often perceived as safe havens. This narrative delves into the complexities of human trafficking in Canada, exploring the legal landscape and what can be done to combat this heinous crime. Human Trafficking in Canada: A Snapshot Canada, known for its strong human rights record, is not immune to the scourge of human trafficking. According to the Canadian Centre to End Human Trafficking, this crime is often hidden, making it challenging to quantify. However, available data paints a concerning picture. Between 2009 and 2016, there were 1,099 police-reported incidents of human trafficking in Canada, with numbers increasing annually. The majority of these cases involved sexual exploitation, and the victims were predominantly women and girls. Legal Framework and Sentencing The question arises: Why does Canada, a country with a robust legal system, appear lenient in sentencing traffickers? The Criminal Code of Canada does have provisions against human trafficking, with penalties ranging up to life imprisonment. However, the application of these laws can be complex. Factors influencing sentencing include the nature of the crime, the trafficker's role, and the impact on victims. In practice, sentences can vary widely, and in some cases, they may seem disproportionately low compared to the severity of the crime. For instance, in 2016, a landmark case in Ontario saw a trafficker sentenced to only five years for crimes involving the sexual exploitation of a minor. This sparked public outcry and raised questions about the effectiveness of Canada's approach to punishing traffickers. Challenges in Prosecution Prosecuting human trafficking cases is fraught with challenges. Victims, often traumatized, may be reluctant to testify. The clandestine nature of trafficking networks makes gathering evidence difficult. Additionally, there's a need for more specialized training for law enforcement and judicial officials to handle these complex cases effectively. Global Context Globally, human trafficking is a lucrative industry, generating an estimated $150 billion annually, according to the International Labour Organization. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reports that 71% of trafficking victims worldwide are women and girls, with 29% being children. What Can Be Done? Strengthening Laws and Policies: Advocates argue for stricter enforcement of existing laws and, where necessary, the introduction of tougher legislation. This includes longer sentences for traffickers and more comprehensive protection for victims. Awareness and Education: Public awareness campaigns can play a crucial role in combating human trafficking. Educating the public about the signs of trafficking and how to report suspicions can lead to more effective prevention and intervention. Supporting Victims: Providing comprehensive support services for victims, including counseling, legal assistance, and reintegration programs, is vital. This support can empower survivors to rebuild their lives and, in some cases, assist in the prosecution of traffickers. International Cooperation: Human trafficking is a transnational crime. Strengthening international collaboration in law enforcement, sharing intelligence, and harmonizing legal frameworks are essential steps in addressing it effectively. Community Involvement: Local communities play a critical role in both identifying potential trafficking situations and supporting victims. Community-based programs can offer localized solutions and assistance. Corporate Responsibility: Businesses must ensure their supply chains are free from forced labor. Implementing ethical labor practices and conducting regular audits can help in this regard. Conclusion The fight against human trafficking in Canada and globally requires a multifaceted approach. While the legal system plays a crucial role, it is not the sole solution. A collective effort involving governments, law enforcement, NGOs, communities, and individuals is essential. By raising awareness, strengthening laws, supporting victims, and fostering international cooperation, we can make significant strides in eradicating this form of modern-day slavery. The journey is challenging, but with concerted efforts, a world free from the chains of human trafficking is an achievable

AN OPEN LETTER: This Holiday Season Be Nice to Hospitality Workers

By Nick Kossovan Dear consumers, The holiday season is upon us. Therefore, sadly predictable, even with hyperinflation and an uncertain economy, our Western consumerism has begun its annual shift into high gear, resulting in our interacting with front-line hospitality workers (retail sales associates, baristas, restaurant servers) more than usual. You can tell a lot about someone by how they treat the person serving them; hence, the value of kindness cannot be overstated. Throughout December and to support extended Boxing Week sales, well into January, hospitality workers will be working long hours, often eating on their feet or in the stockroom, missing out on festivities with friends and family and exhausting themselves. Crippling staffing shortages, coupled with stock shortages, have created stressful retail and eating establishment environments for both employees and customers. God forbid Barbie Dreamhouse is not in stock, the barista added the wrong flavoured syrup to your coffee, the Subway counter clerk forgot to swap your salad for chips, or you asked for no ice, and your drink came with ice. Breathe! You have food, a roof over your head, work to go to, and a sense of safety, as opposed to the millions worldwide who currently live in unimaginable poverty or, through no fault of their own, find themselves living in a war zone. Humans, especially in stressful, busy work environments, are bound to make mistakes. You gain nothing by not treating the person serving you with the respect they deserve other than adding stress to an already stressful situation and, as I have often seen, making a public scene because your Kansas City Striploin was done, according to you, medium-well, not well-done as you asked for. As much as everyone bemoans the economy and how hard it is to make "ends meet" (READ: "I have to rethink my wants.") our society has somehow evolved to where consumers have the privilege of prioritizing getting stressed over a toy, not being in stock, over putting food on the table. I assure you that the person serving you did not purposefully run out of stock or intentionally make whatever mistake you are upset over. Do not take it personally—it is not the end of the world. As an understanding and empathetic human being, which I hope we all are, give the person the benefit of the doubt and politely point out the mistake... or better yet, let it go! (The salad is better for you.) Now is the ideal time to put aside our 1st world privileges. If the person serving makes a mistake, which I repeat was unintentional, be understanding, nice and forgiving. Remember, especially when dining out, that the person serving you is working hard, while juggling factors out of their control (e.g., the chef called in sick, an item is out of stock, the cappuccino machine is broken), trying to make your experience as pleasant as possible. Who is not angry about today's prices? When making purchases which your cashier ringing them up likely cannot afford, be nice! Hospitality workers have no control over prices. If something is expensive, rethink if you really need to make the purchase and why you are making it. Is it to impress? To look rich? An attempt to buy acceptance or love? Evaluating your reasons for making a purchase is much more financially savvy than berating a sales associate that the Jordan Retro 7 sneakers you want to gift to your nephew in Regina, whom you have not spoken to in three years, but you want your brother to perceive you as "financially successful," cost $245. The sales associate or your server did not set the price. How you spend your money, what you are willing to pay, is entirely on you, not the person serving you. If you are angry at how much something costs, be angry at yourself for believing you "must have it." Hospitality workers are people with real feelings. Shouting at a McDonald's counter server, which I had seen on several occasions because they gave you sweet and sour dipping sauce when you asked for barbecue, will likely result in that person going in the back to cry. Was it worth making someone earning minimum wage feel bad for making an unintentional mistake over dipping sauce? The holidays are about celebrating the values that bind us and coming together. Despite all our self-identifying differences and how the media and politicians go to great lengths to create divisiveness, I like to think we can all agree, even though we do not always act accordingly—everyone is allowed a few bad days—that being nice to each other is a critical part of our social contract. Is not the heart of humanity human kindness? Smiling costs nothing. Saying "Please" and "Thank you" costs nothing. It costs nothing to treat bar, retail, and restaurant staff with patience. There is no better place to start than with hospitality workers to live by the simple golden rule: "Treat others as you would like to be treated," not just during the holiday season but throughout the year. As I mentioned initially, how you treat the person serving you tells a lot about you. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Conspiracy of Silence

from Wayne & Tamara I'm hoping you can help me with a moral problem that crops up every now and then in my personal and professional life. Sometimes I find myself being blamed for an error or lack of judgment that actually occurred on someone else's part. For example, I asked someone at work about using a certain location for a display, was given the go-ahead, then chastised for using that location. When the only way I can defend myself involves pointing the finger at someone else, I'm in a real quandary. I am rarely prepared to defend myself if it means making someone else look bad. I handle the problem by saying nothing. I simply don't know what to say. There is usually ample opportunity for the person responsible to come forward, but I find that hardly ever happens. How can I handle this type of problem without taking the low road of attacking others? What is the moral or ethical thing to do? Karla Karla, each of us has principles of behavior rattling around in our head. These principles range from the Golden Rule to Miss Manners' etiquette to the Boy Scout Creed. Often we are not sure which principle to apply. The principle you are applying here is the playground and schoolyard rule which says one shouldn't snitch to a parent or teacher. It is not an ethical rule so much as a rule children employ in play. A much more basic rule applies. That rule says, in simple justice, each of us deserves to be known for the person we are. Your lack of explanations makes you look guilty. Coming forward and explaining why you acted as you did should not be a moral or ethical problem for you. It is simply a matter of fact. If you acted because Sheila told you to do it that way, or the employee handbook says to do it that way, or you have always done it that way and no one told you otherwise, you are simply reporting a fact. You should look at this as an impersonal matter, much as if you are reporting the time or the weather. When you report facts in these situations, there are three rules to remember: don't apologize, don't apologize, and don't apologize. An apology is due when you have done something wrong; no apology is called for when stating the reality of a situation. Karla, you don't have an ethical problem, but the people who know the truth and remain silent do. Wayne SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com

Doctor, with Limitations

The Doctor Game Have Faith in the

By Common Sense Health – W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Is it wise to believe what the doctor tells you? Or are there misleading types, not entirely honest with their patients? Does the medical system place the patient’s best interests first, as commonly stated on health center posters? Or do other factors, like pressure to ease wait times for a high-demand treatments, mean that some people aren’t informed of their best options. The truth is, having implicit faith in the medical profession is risky business. There are ample reasons to place your faith in doctors and medicines. Antibiotics save people from dying of pneumonia and a host of other diseases. Cortisone enables people to be free of wheelchairs. Cardiac pacemakers add years to the lives of heart patients. Surgeons (and organ donors) give new life to those needing transplanted hearts and kidneys. Individuals with diabetes or high blood pressure who trust their doctors are more likely to have better control of these problems because they have confidence in an agreed treatment plan and see the results. In fact, we’re all safer when people trust their doctors. Studies have shown that people who don’t trust in their medical care are less likely to take needed medications, for example. For some conditions, without that medication, individual and societal risk factors go up – the likelihood of car accidents, as one example, or the spread of a communicable disease, as another. People who have faith in their doctors can be thanked for their agreement to participate in clinical trials of new drugs and technologies. But blind trust is a fool’s game, as some doctors have entered the profession to make money instead of to care for people. Others have fallen from grace, lured by profit-seeking drug companies, or working the system to their financial gain. Some doctors are just not good practitioners. Watch out for the family doctor who doesn’t call in the services of a specialist when the situation warrants. Patients should also be on the alert for surgeons who too quickly decide on surgery as a treatment when other options should also be considered. In this case, unless the urgency is clear, use your wits and get a second opinion. Even the best doctor will make a rare mistake. You can help prevent this by reading up on the issues associated with your problem and treatment, asking questions of the doctor, and going over decisions a second time. In some situations, it is the patients who are the problem, as when they don’t like the advice of good doctors. They run down the street to find another one who is willing to write an unnecessary prescription, expose patients to the radiation of unneeded x-rays, or book a risky operation. You should remember that doctors who try to protect you from treatment are often more sincere than those who push you into it. Not trusting your doctor enough can be a bad mistake. Most of them play a good game. On every visit, your doctor should be listening to you carefully. Empathy for your situation is the hallmark of a good physician, but this should not be your main concern. Does it feel like the doctor and staff are on your team? Are your options explained in a way you can understand, and are you included in the decision making about what treatment is best for you? Although it may not be easy to find, it’s worth exploring the reputation of the doctor among his or her peers. So have faith, with limitations, and use a little common sense. You'll end up with better care. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

THE HYPOCRISY OF ELECTED OFFICIALS: EMPTY WORDS AND MISSED OPPORTUNITIES

The Hypocrisy of Elected Officials: Empty Words and Missed Opportunities In the realm of politics, it is not uncommon to witness a mismatch between rhetoric and action. It is disheartening to observe elected officials who passionately advocate for helping the homeless, feeding those in need, and prioritizing mental health and well-being, only to fall short when it comes time to vote on these critical issues. Instead, they seem more interested in allocating taxpayers' money towards extravagant artwork, leaving one feeling a sense of shame and witnessing blatant hypocrisy. The plight of the homeless, the hungry, and those struggling with mental health issues is a pressing concern that demands urgent attention. It requires lawmakers who are not only vocal about their commitment to addressing these issues but also exhibit a genuine dedication to finding tangible solutions. Yet, all too often, we see politicians who excel in delivering eloquent speeches, emphasizing the importance of these matters, only for their actions to contradict their words. Pickering’s diversion of funds towards artwork, while neglecting essential social welfare programs, is a clear example of this hypocrisy. Art has its place and value in society, but when elected officials prioritize it over initiatives that directly impact the lives of the less fortunate, it becomes a cause for concern. It begs the question: do these officials truly prioritize the needs of their constituents, or are they merely seeking to make superficial gestures for the sake of appearances? And secondly, Addressing homelessness, hunger, and mental health issues requires more than just lip service. It demands a commitment to allocating resources, implementing effective policies, and collaborating with community organizations and experts. Sadly, when elected officials fail to back their words with concrete actions, they undermine the trust and hope placed in them by the very people they are meant to serve. To overcome this hypocrisy, it is crucial for citizens to hold their elected officials accountable. We must actively engage in the political process, demand transparency, and advocate for policies that prioritize the well-being of all members of society. By electing individuals who genuinely demonstrate their commitment to these pressing issues, we can work towards building a more compassionate and equitable society. It is imperative that citizens, strive to elect representatives who align their words and actions seamlessly, rather than those who exhibit hypocrisy and shift responsibility to higher levels of government. We possess the capability to do what is morally right and allocate necessary funds at the municipal level to support those in need. This can be achieved through a simple, yet powerful act of voting. Let us seize this opportunity to elect leaders who exemplify integrity, embodying the values we hold dear, and actively work towards positive change within our communities. When we empower the people, we ignite change, and only then can we move towards a future where the needs of the vulnerable are finally prioritized over self-serving gestures.

A Job, A Career... Which Do You Really Want? Why?

By Nick Kossovan When someone asks me for job search advice, my first question is: What are you looking for? A job or a career? So we are on the same page: · A career is a professional journey centred around a particular field, industry, and skill set. · A job is an activity you do for an employer for money. Earning money is the primary goal of every career and job. I have yet to meet anyone who would do their career or job for free. Increasingly, I am seeing job seekers searching for career jobs (e.g. marketing, social media management, financial services) but who are not career-driven, which savvy hiring managers take into account when assessing a candidate. INTERVIEWER: "I see you got your PM certification in 2014; how have you been updating your knowledge and skills since then?" INTERVIEWER: "Are you a member of any industry associations? Do you sit on any boards?" Despite what your well-meaning parents, high school guidance counsellor and social norms have told you, it is okay not to want a career—careers are not for everyone. So long as you can support yourself financially doing a job (e.g., carpenter, bricklayer, server, taxi driver, warehouse picker, mechanic), which you absolutely can, you do not need "a career." Career success involves climbing a ladder and navigating cutthroat office politics, which is not everyone's cup of tea. I have been knocked off "the ladder" more than once. In increasingly hostile workplaces, where everyone is fighting for survival, job seekers would greatly benefit from reflecting on whether they have the ambition, skills, social acumen, and mental fortitude to maintain a career. Few people ask themselves, especially in their late high school years, whether they want a job or a career when it comes to earning a living. It is never too late to reassess whether you want to remain in your career versus finding a job/learning a trade by asking yourself, "Is the juice worth the squeeze?" I know several people who have given up their career and opted for a job where they can clock in and out, resulting in less stress, being happier, and even making more money. Do you know what an AZ truck driver can make these days? Generally, people underestimate how difficult establishing and maintaining a career is. The time, sacrifices, continuous learning, and cultivating professional networks, particularly if you're trying to break into a field other than IT, finance, or sales, takes effort. In hindsight, I admit most of my failures were due to underestimating the work required. My failures were caused by the leading reason people fail: Not working hard enough. (Readers of my column know I don't play the "I'm a victim!" game.) There is no shame in not being career-driven. Millions of people live meaningful and fulfilling lives without a career. Perhaps it is just me, but I feel a waitress who smiles and makes small talk with a customer who appears lonely or sad makes the world a better place compared to a VP of Marketing whose job is to figure out how to manipulate consumers into buying products, often stuff we do not need which end up in landfills, or nutrient-deficient processed food, we should not be consuming. Your parents' definition of success and seeing what others have accomplished— whether they are happy and fulfilled is another matter—and, of course, your ego influenced whether you are now chasing a career. Passion versus money is an internal debate that everyone has at some point in their life, if not throughout their life. From one side, you probably have parents, relatives, friends, and even strangers (I raise my hand) telling you to be realistic and find a well-paying job. However, on the other side, you likely have well-meaning friends, Internet talking heads giving reconstituted job search advice, and TED talks of successful people telling you that "following your passion is the foundation for success." It is no wonder so many people anxiously question whether they should follow their passion, which is unlikely to earn them a living or choose a career that looks reasonably promising and has a somewhat stable future; this especially applies to artistic endeavours or being a social media influencer. Recently, I overheard someone say to a journalist who had been laid off, "Learn to code." The advice was not encouraging, but it was pragmatic. Due to my pragmatic nature, I nodded in agreement. “Being pragmatic is not surrender. Being pragmatic is not cynicism. Being pragmatic is not selling out. In truth, being pragmatic is often the only real path to progress in an uncertain, complicated world.” ? Tom C.W. Lin, Jack E. Feinberg Chair Professor of Law at Temple University's Beasley School of Law. The end goal of most people is to have a steady paycheck and benefits; hence, the question I mentioned earlier: Is the juice (a career) worth the squeeze? The competition for career jobs is fierce and likely to intensify. In contrast, competition for blue-collar jobs is not nearly as fierce. Do you know what plumbers make these days? _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

The Great Political Awakening: Taking Our Country Back

By Dale Jodoin In the heart of Canada, a story of resilience and change is unfolding. For years, the political landscape has been dominated by voices that didn't always represent the will of the people. The left and the right, each pulling in their own direction, left many feeling lost and unheard. But now, a shift is occurring, a movement that starts with a sense of disappointment but grows into a powerful force for change. In the beginning, there was a growing sense of frustration. Taxes were rising, making life harder for everyday Canadians. They had to choose between essentials like food and keeping their homes warm. The political parties, especially those on the left – the Liberals, the NDP, and the Bloc Québécois – seemed out of touch with these struggles. They focused on small groups, leaving the majority feeling neglected. This approach led to a deep sense of disillusionment. As the government continued to demand more, sending aid to other countries without clear accountability, questions began to arise. Where was this money going? Why were Canadians struggling to make ends meet while billions were sent overseas? The media, which many felt was echoing the voice of the government, lost its trust among the people. But from this disappointment, a new chapter began. The center – a diverse and vibrant part of Canadian society – started to awaken. This wasn't just a single group; it was a collection of voices from various nationalities and ethnic backgrounds, all united by their shared experiences and aspirations. They began to see past the divisions that had been created and started to come together. This awakening was about more than just politics. It was about finding a common ground, a place where everyone, regardless of their background, could come together and voice their concerns. The center realized that their strength lay in their diversity and unity. They began to question the status quo, challenging the narratives that had been fed to them for so long. As they came together, a new vision for Canada emerged. One where the government listened to its people, where policies reflected the needs of the many, not just the few. This vision was about creating a Canada that was inclusive, where everyone had a chance to succeed, and where diversity was celebrated. The journey wasn't easy. The left, resistant to change, tried to maintain its grip on power. But the will of the people was strong. They were no longer afraid to stand up and demand a change. They were no longer content with being sidelined. The majority of Canadians, who had long been silent, were now speaking up, ready to take an active role in shaping their country's future. As this story of awakening continues, there's a sense of hope and determination. The people of Canada, in all their diversity, are coming together to reclaim their voice. They're ready to work towards a future that reflects their values and aspirations. This is the Great Political Awakening – a movement not defined by left or right, but by the shared desire for a better, more inclusive Canada.

Council's Approval for 1635 Dundas Operation Agreement

Mayor Elizabeth Roy Thank you to the Whitby residents who took the time to share questions and concerns. Your feedback helped shape this agreement and ensure crucial provisions were included. And thank you to the Region of Durham for negotiating in good faith with the Town of Whitby. I firmly believe that a community’s strength is measured in how it cares for its most vulnerable members – and that everyone deserves a roof over their head and a safe place to lay their head at night. Homelessness is a growing crisis in Whitby. With winter fast approaching, there are members of our community living in encampments in our town’s ravines and green spaces, as well as couch surfing or living in a vehicle. In recent weeks, we have seen headlines about deaths in homeless encampments in Kingston, Cornwall, and Mississauga. The approved agreement puts the Region in a position to operate a shelter that meets the needs of those experiencing homelessness while prioritizing safety and security for the neighbourhoods surrounding 1635 Dundas. It also addresses many of the concerns raised by the community. For example, the agreement states that the total number of shelter spaces of any kind will be capped at 45 – regardless of future phases at 1635 Dundas -- and that this location will not house a safe consumption site unless one is requested by the Town of Whitby. Municipalities cannot address the rising tide of homelessness alone. It is imperative that the provincial and federal governments step up to provide funding for homelessness supports and affordable housing initiatives, as well as measures to address the cost-of-living crisis. I applaud and thank all members of Whitby Council for participating fully in the discussions around 1635 Dundas and advocating for their constituents. That said, I do not agree that an interim control bylaw (ICBL) for 1635 Dundas would have resulted in any gains for the community. If an ICBL had been approved, the Town of Whitby would have lost hard-won provisions in the agreement with the Region, and the opening of a much-needed shelter would have been delayed. The Town of Whitby will be watching closely as 1635 Dundas begins operation and will continue to advocate for measures that prioritize the safety and well-being of shelter residents and surrounding neighbourhoods..

Mayor Kevin Ashe

By Kevin Ashe Mayor, City of Pickering As we bid farewell to November and embrace the winter season, I want to take a moment to reflect on the significance of this month, filled with remembrance. November marks Remembrance Day, a solemn occasion to honour and pay tribute to the brave men and women who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our freedoms. Over the month of November, our city came together in unity, remembering our heroes and honouring our veterans for defending the values that we all hold dear. I was honoured to join members of our community at several Remembrance Day services in our community to honour and pay tribute to our heroes. Let us carry their legacy forward by fostering a community that values peace, compassion, and understanding. Lest We Forget. As the crisp autumn leaves make way for the snow, the winter season brings a unique charm to our City. With the winter season upon us, it's essential to prepare for the colder months. Make sure your homes are winter-ready, put on your winter tires, and don't forget to check on our seniors and neighbours who may need assistance. I'm thrilled to share that Pickering had a bustling November filled with significant updates and developments. I encourage you to read below on the important updates happening in our City. These initiatives will contribute to the continued growth and prosperity of our community. As always, please do not hesitate to contact my office at mayor@pickering.ca or 905.420.4600. Also, I encourage you to stay up to date on the latest news in Pickering by subscribing to my newsletter if you haven't already.

KEEPING YOU INFORMED

By Maurice Brenner Deputy Mayor/Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering Have you ever wondered what the role of a Councillor is? This is a topic that generates lots of discussion and will be the focus of this weeks column along with an update on Durham Regions Warming Plan to support unsheltered residents in Durham. As a Municipal politician, I am the front line working at the grass roots level. And while it is important to sit on a Council and the many committees I am appointed too, it is equally important to use the role to be a community builder. A community builder goes well beyond bricks and mortar. A community builder is how a Councillor works with the Communities at the Neighbourhood level, and how they use their voice to advance a Community agenda tied to the responsibilities that align at the Municipal level. In the Ward I represent, I am very fortunate to have worked for many years with various neighbourhoods and their leaders to not just build partnerships but to build community capacity through old fashion Community Development and Community Organizing which translates into Community Engagement and Community Empowerment. Ward 1 has more organized Community Groups then all other Wards. Wiith 4 active neighbourhoods; Pickering Westshore Community Association, Fairport Beach Neighbourhood Association, Rougemount Community & Recreation Association and South Rosebank Good Neighbours, these groups have the pulse of the the residents in their geographic areas which enables me to better to make informed decisions. One of the major pitfalls of Municipal Politicians is that it’s easy to live in a glass bubble, but when working to build strong neighbourhood relationships it helps you stay focused when dealing with the decisions that cross the Council floor. I am very proud to work with an amazing team of resident groups and appreciate their on going support and look forward to continue to build Community capacity across other neighbourhoods in Ward 1. During the winter months, warmth and shelter are a matter of life or death for vulnerable populations. This is why the Region of Durham has a Winter Warming Plan in place, which offers spaces for unsheltered residents to stay warm. Warmth and shelter are critical resources for health and safety, as people experiencing homelessness or those who are marginally housed are one of the most at-risk groups for cold-related illnesses. Cold-related illnesses include hypothermia, frostnip and frostbite, and trench foot. Cold weather can also make existing health conditions worse, such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. The effects of cold weather can be experienced for up to 21 days following exposure. Winter warming and shelter programs are located in Ajax, Oshawa, Pickering, Whitby and north Durham. For residents who require transportation to access a warming location or shelter program, transportation support is available through Housing outreach agencies. This winter season, Regional Headquarters at 605 Rossland Road East, Whitby, will also serve as a warming location effective December 4th from 8:30pm, until 8:00am. For a complete list of warming locations, please visit durham.ca/WinterWarming. Please refer back to this page for updates through the winter, as the locations and times may change.

PLEASE WRITE TO YOUR LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - I like to begin this column by thanking the many people that have called our office and signed up for home delivery of the community news source. Just as many of you have called wondering why you do not see more municipal notices, road closure, events, and the like. I like to assure everyone that we are doing all we can to soon start showcasing on separate pages events happening and notices for each municipality. This will include, Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, Clarington, Port Perry and the Region. I encourage everyone to write to their local municipality and demand that you be notified of all upcoming events. Traditionally, each municipality would have allocated a City, Town or Regional page in Metroland. This made the bankrupt Metroland newspaper a source for citizens to find out what was happening in their communities. Since their bankruptcy. Citizens across Durham region have been in the dark. Some of you have been directed to a web site. Municipal web sites that are beyond complicated to navigate and full of to much redundant information. The rule of thumb for anyone visiting a web page is... if it takes more thank three clicks. You lost your viewer. I also believe that it is irresponsible for municipalities including the Region to expect people to visit a web site as many people can’t afford computers or the internet. Not to mention many people out there are computer illiterate. We are now coming in to the winter season. People are left to fend for themselves. What are the holiday garbage pick up? What roads are closed? Should we attend an event? Municipalities have many responsibilities and one of them is to keep the citizens informed. The Central Newspaper as the only in print newspaper is the only logical choice. People are already flocking to pick up copies across the Region in order to be informed. Now, let’s take a quick look at why newsprint will never go away and or is the source to keep people informed. One, newsprint sits in your home and can be easily accessible. It does not require that the reader need to incur an expense on the purchase of a phone, computer and or the internet. Newsprint is right there. You can rely that the information in front of you is true and reliable. The internet today is nothing short of a public toilet. Filled with misinformation and unreliable sources. Let’s keep you informed. Write your local councilor or Mayor let them know where you stand.

The Meeting of the Big Spenders

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East Canada recently hosted European Union (EU) leaders in St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, for the 19th Canada-EU Leaders’ Summit, held November 23 and 24, 2023. Prime Minister Trudeau hosted the President of the European Council, Charles Michel, and the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. The Summit was an opportunity to underscore the so-called strong ties between Canada and the EU and for leaders to discuss the progress on key commitments established during the 2021 Canada-EU Leaders’ Summit in Belgium. That included creating jobs and opportunities and building the middle class; fighting climate change and halting biodiversity loss; increasing collaboration on technology, research, and innovation; and building sustainable and resilient economies for future generations. At the end of the meeting, leaders reaffirmed their support for strengthening trade under the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, as reported by the official press. In his discussions with EU leaders, Prime Minister Trudeau also highlighted Canada and the EU’s shared commitment to promote democracy, human rights, clean energy, gender equality, and the rule of law to create a better, more equitable world. Beautiful words and commendable platitudes, while not a word was mentioned about the inordinate amounts of public money these leaders have spent on futile projects, which in fact weaken the European and Canadian economies. Let us look at some of these expenditures in detail. The Canada-EU relationship is the oldest formal relationship the EU has with any industrialized country, dating back to 1959. However, over the years, Canada has lost its relevance on the European scene. Canada used to be a leader in providing active advice for the European Union on many fronts and institutions, notably the Venice Commission. Today, Canada has no diplomatic representation in Strasbourg, France where many important issues are discussed and where the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe has quarterly meetings. This is an important forum, because it has wide parliamentary representation, from not only EU member countries but also countries from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia. This is a forum were future leaders emerge, but Canada is missing in diplomatic action. The energy crisis looms large in Europe. Germany, the economic engine of the EU now pays about four times as much for its energy; energy it once secured cheaply from Russia. With that source no longer available, the situation is not encouraging. The two leaders of Europe, the President of the European Council, Charles Michel, and the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen are spending billions of dollars on subsidies and pie-in-the-sky projects in the name of democracy, with practically no accountability. Unfortunately, we see a parallel situation at home in Canada, with a spending spree on futile projects where taxpayers’ money is being cast into a bottomless pit without any scrutiny. No wonder these leaders are in such harmonious agreement. None of them seems to care a jot; it is not their money. According to their usual practice, the leaders of Canada and the European Union wrapped up this two-day summit in Newfoundland with a flurry of partnership announcements on green energy, raw minerals and research funding. Substantive negotiations are in the works surrounding Canada’s bid to join Horizon Europe, the EU’s $100-billion scientific research program. They are working toward the “prompt signature and implementation” of an official deal, the statement declared. “The association of Canada to Horizon is the deepest form of research and innovation collaboration that we can offer,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told reporters after the summit’s closing speeches. Nice of her, but let us see the results. Declarations about the close ties between the two regions permeated the summit, which brought European Council President Charles Michel and von der Leyen to Newfoundland and Labrador’s capital city of St. John’s. Trudeau described Canadians and Europeans as “some of the best of friends in the world,” during his opening remarks at the summit. This is in interesting contrast with his stance on aboriginal issues, which he contends, are a direct result of the malefic influence Europe has exerted on Canada. Canada and the EU also announced what they are calling a new Green Alliance, focused on deepening existing partnerships to fight climate change, halt biodiversity loss and intensify technological and scientific co-operation; clearly invested in spending more money on pet projects. The EU leaders pledged to further collaborate with Canada on critical minerals, as allied countries seek components for goods such as electrical vehicles from places other than China. While mining is not necessarily a top priority for the liberal government, it is worth mentioning that battery production and disposal is very environmentally unfriendly, despite what politicians enamored with the idea, might claim. Von der Leyen noted that Canada is the only country in the Western Hemisphere with all the raw materials required for lithium batteries, and she invited Canada to join the EU’s “critical raw materials club,” which is set to be launched at the COP28 climate conference in Dubai on late November. However, Roger Hilton, a research fellow at Globsec, a security and sustainability think-tank based in Bratislava, warned that the friendship on abundant display in St. John’s might not be present at the next EU-Canada Summit in 2025. “Cracks in Europe’s defence against far-right politics are starting to be exposed,” Hilton said in an email, pointing to several recent election victories for populist leaders in EU countries, including the Netherlands and Slovakia. Therefore, we start to see some movement in Europe towards more diverse and more realistic politics. Combined with the demise of the Biden administration in the US, this might also start a new chapter in politics here in Canada, calling for more respect and accountability about public spending. In regards to the presently complex geopolitical situation in Europe and the Middle East, leaders stated their usual positions and committed more money to be spent for projects in the area. As we have seen, spending money is not a problem for these leaders, especially if it is not their own. What do you think? Should we spending more money on Canadians?

Balancing Inclusion and Tradition: The Debate Surrounding PFLAG and Politicians Participation in Santa Claus Parades

Santa Claus parades hold a special place in our hearts, capturing the essence of the holiday season with their joyful and inclusive atmosphere. However, as we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of diversity and inclusion, questions arise about which organizations should participate and why. I was taught from a very young age that politicians should refrain from participating in Santa Claus parades. My parents instilled in me that a politician's presence can politicize an event that should be centered around community and traditions and not be politized. These parades are cherished opportunities for communities to come together, regardless of political affiliations to celebrate the holiday season together. Knowing how politicians have divided our Country within the past couple of years, I too think politicians may inadvertently shift the focus away from the spirit of unity and joy, which is the very substance on which these parades thrive. At this very moment in time, while I write this article, the anticipation builds as the mayor and fellow council members prepare to join the Santa Claus parade. I for one, after careful consideration, have chosen to remain on standby and uphold my personal morals and beliefs. While I respect their decision to participate, I believe it is essential for individuals to stay true to their convictions. Allowing for diverse perspectives and ensuring that our actions align with our values. By taking this stance, I hope to contribute to a society that encourages open dialogue, understanding, and the freedom to make choices based on personal principles, and not on finding ways to retaliate against our fellow man for having opposing views. As I mentioned earlier, not only has my upbringing instilled in me to avoid politicizing such festive events, but also being a mother, and an advocate for my community, I have become very mindful of organizations like PFLAG who may contradict different religious and/or cultural teachings, leading many to object to their presence in a traditional event like a Santa Claus parade. Some people are concerned about the appropriateness of exposing children to LGBTQ+ symbols at such a young age could be inappropriate or confusing, while others believe they are advocating for the sexualization of children. Personally, I will at all costs refrain from supporting such a cause and instead, prioritize the well-being and innocence of young ones during these cherished moments. PFLAG, which offers support and advocacy for LGBTQ+ individuals and their loved ones, mission is undeniably important, yet some argue against their inclusion in Santa Claus parades for a variety of reasons. Some critics argue that Santa Claus parades should primarily focus on maintaining the spirit of the event. These parades are cherished traditions that families attend to experience the magic and wonder of the holiday season. Many believe that introducing topics related to sexuality or gender identity may divert attention from the primary purpose of the parade, potentially diminishing the overall enchanting atmosphere for all attendees, especially young children. Secondly, the desire to avoid controversy plays a significant role in the debate. Discussions surrounding LGBTQ+ rights can be polarizing, and including PFLAG in a Santa Claus parade may unwittingly invite heated debates that detract from the parade's intended message of unity and celebration. Organizers may wish to keep the parade centered on traditional holiday themes that are more universally accepted. Another consideration is the need to respect diverse perspectives. While PFLAG serves as a vital support system, some individuals hold personal or religious beliefs that differ from its mission or message. Santa Claus parades strive to be inclusive, and organizers may aim to avoid alienating or offending any segment of the community by steering clear of potentially divisive topics or groups. Lastly, the appropriateness of content in relation to the audience plays a role in this debate. Santa Claus parades are often attended by families with young children who may not yet be ready to comprehend or discuss topics related to sexuality or gender identity. Some argue that introducing these discussions in an age-appropriate setting, such as secondary schools or community centers, may be more suitable than during a parade primarily targeted towards younger audiences. It is crucial to note that these concerns do not seek to undermine the importance of organizations like PFLAG or their vital advocacy efforts. Instead, they reflect the considerations and perspectives of those who question the inclusion of certain groups in Santa Claus parades. We need to navigate this delicate balance between tradition and inclusion, and it is essential to engage in respectful dialogue and seek compromise. Perhaps, finding alternative platforms to highlight the essential work of organizations like PFLAG, where discussions on LGBTQ+ issues can be more focused and age-appropriate, would be a step towards a harmonious resolution. To be clear, my perspective is not rooted in any form of transphobia or homophobia. Rather, my concern and those raised by my constituents lies in safeguarding the well-being of children and preserving their childhood innocence by protecting them from any form of sexualization or exposure to adult themes during Santa Claus parades and events. In the end, the debate surrounding PFLAG's participation in Santa Claus parades serves as a reminder that inclusivity is a complex endeavor. requiring careful consideration of various perspectives and traditions. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

KEEPING YOU INFORMED-AFFORDALE HOUSING

By Maurice Brenner Deputy Mayor/Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering The need for affordable housing has never been greater. On November 22nd for those who missed it, was National Housing Day. A day to raise awareness about our housing crisis and growing numbers of persons who are homeless. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? As Homelessness continues to grow, we are reminded of the increasing numbers of those who are one pay cheque away from not being able to afford a roof over their head or put food on the table. Statistics confirm that 49% of Canadians are spending over 50% of their incomes for a roof over their heads which is unsustainable and many in Durham Region face this crisis. WHAT ARE THE OPTIONS? While there is no question that increasing inflationary costs is a factor, and there is a need for upper level governments to find ways to reduce costs, we at the Municipal level can also play a key role through the Planning process. Ontario’s Housing Policy requires Municipalities to meet targets through intensification along Transit Corridors, as members of Council, there are opportunities to incorporate affordable strategies into action by requiring Developers to include in their plans affordable housing ownership through partnerships such as Habitat for Humanities. Other strategies must recognize that there is a need for Rental units including partnership with Durham Region Non-Profit, Durham Region Community Housing and other Social Housing providers. This won’t happen overnight, which is why we also need to be creative when it comes to creating options to help those who are already homeless. Pickering like many Municipalities is currently preparing its Community Safety Wellbeing Plan. Embedded into its work plan is taking on the challenge to find solutions rather than just dealing with the symptoms of homelessness which is why Council supported my resolution directing staff to create a dedicated staff position to lead the Community Safety Wellbeing Plan as well as to establish an Office of Affordability with-in the Planning and Development Department whose mandate will be to assess every application through the affordability lens. As champions for finding solutions to help those who are homeless, Pickering works closely with Community Groups and organizations like DARS, who provides outreach to those who are homeless in Pickering. DARS also provides a weekly lunch program (Wednesdays) in partnership with the Pickering Public Library, shower and hygiene program in partnership with the Chestnut Hill Development Community Centre (Arena) and a new concept of a warming centre that is tied to Health risks rather than temperature. I’m also excited to be working along side with DARS on launching an exciting entrepreneur transitional housing pilot which will be a upcoming feature once its finalized.

THE FALLACY OF ONLINE NEWS LETTERS

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - What is it about human ignorance that is so ignorant? Ignorance as in lacking information or the intellectual ability to rationalize common sense. It appears that some municipalities are now attempting due to costs of printing opting to offer news and information via newsletters. This including the bankrupt former Metroland. Now apparantly offering news online only. You got to wonder how stupid do they think the readers/consumer/advertiser are. They screw over numerous municipalities, supplier and kids, (carriers). Now they expect for those same municipalities to continue supporting them? Incredible. Anyone using this means to broadcast their information is committing the ultimate social fallacy and clearly showing the lack of understanding of media, internet and the dynamics/logistics of the web. In part this is why many in print have failed. This is why those now still in print are prospering. A fallacy by definition: a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument. "the notion that the camera never lies is a fallacy" With this said. Some municipalities are opting to force taxpayers to sign up for news letters online. Force them to go to their web pages. These same municipalities fail to understand the logistic and dynamics of their client/audience/taxpayer. This is the primary reason why many that have stop publishing failed. They do not understand their audience. How trends come and go. Municipalities forcing taxpayer to go to their webpages are showing lack of empathy during these tough economic times. Many can’t afford the internet, or computer. Many are on tight budgets and can’t even afford a cell phone. But leaving the financial burden aside. How about all those that do not use computers. Or have computers? How about all those that actually fall for the ‘sign up’ for our news letter malarkey. How many of those news letters end up in the spam folder? You got to wonder at who is doing the thinking. But you can’t blame municipalities that fall for this type of fallacy. After all many hire young people with little or no experience in the field of media, internet and trends. Many just follow the social norms and hearsay. They go on gut feelings not on what is best for the taxpayers. Look at some council where they vote on staff recommendation and not on good solid educated leadership. Next time you are forced to sign up for a news letter. Say, thanks but no thanks. Buy local and support your local small businesses.

Canada ethnic tensions

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East In a world with a multitude of problems, where local wars are startGross mismanagement of taxpayers’ money. One must ask oneself: how long will Canadians tolerate the mismanagement of their hard-earned money. I personally hope that this will soon end, otherwise our standard of living will be affected badly. We have a rich country and we do not deserve to be treated like losers. Here are some of the facts that will make any Canadian ask who the politicians (at all levels and all parties) are, who are so blithely leading us into foreseeable disaster. Let us start with the latest worship of battery plants for electric vehicles. Both provincial and federal parties have invested heavily, using taxpayers’ money, in these highly polluting desecrations of nature, in the name of new jobs and other phantasmagoric promises. Last week the Parliamentary Budged Office (PBO) stated that the Provincial and Federal financial support for electric vehicle (EV) battery production will cost $5.8 billion more than government projections due to tax treatment of subsidies. The PBO report says the shortfall of $5.8 billion over ten years can be attributed to lost corporate income because the Canadian deal has to keep pace with the Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit (AMPC) in the United States. Under the U.S. deal, manufacturers get a tax credit, based on a calculation of per kilowatt-hour of energy, but in Canada that financial support per kilowatt-hour is delivered through a taxable subsidy. "Therefore, under existing law in Canada, these payments would be subject to applicable federal and provincial corporate income tax," the report said. The PBO report makes the assumption that to stay on par with the U.S. AMPC, the subsidies will be exempt from federal and provincial taxes, which would cost about $5.8 billion in tax revenue. An analysis of government support for the EV battery deals with Northvolt, Volkswagen and Stellantis- South Korea LG Energy Solutions said that over the next ten years that support will amount to $43.6 billion, rather than the announced costs of $37.7 billion. The deals with the three manufacturers amount to production subsidies of $32.8 billion, with an additional $4.9 billion in support to build the facilities. "Of the $43.6 billion in total costs, we estimate that $26.9 billion (62 per cent) in costs will be incurred by the federal government and $16.7 billion (38 per cent) will fall on the provincial governments of Ontario and Quebec," the report said. The report, which also looked at how long it will take for governments to break even on their investments, found that: 1. The Northvolt deal has a break-even time of 11 years, two years longer than the federal government's estimate; 2. The break-even time for the $13.2-billion Volkswagen deal is 15 years; and 3. The break-even time for the $15-billion joint venture Stellantis-South Korea LG Energy Solutions now called NextStar Energy Inc. deal was pegged at 23 years. The report also assumes that government investments will be debt-financed and therefore will incur public debt charges over the next decade that could amount to $6.6 billion. Well done governments! To add insult to injury, the latest news is that the NextStar Energy Inc. plans to bring in a sizable contingent of foreign workers to help build this heavily subsidized battery plant in Windsor, Ontario. Concerns were raised when Windsor police noted that after meeting with South Korean ambassador Woongsoon Lim, about 1,600 workers from South Korea were expected to come to the community next year, to help build the plant. Though it is not clear how many workers, in total, NextStar Energy Inc. the joint venture between automaker Stellantis and South Korea's LG, plans to bring from outside Canada, this issue has drawn legitimate concerns about why the jobs are not going to Canadians. NextStar Energy chief executive Danies Lee said in a statement that the company is committed to hiring Canadians to fill more than 2,500 full-time jobs at the battery plant, and engage with up to 2,300 more local tradespeople to help with construction and installation. He said, however, that the company has to bring in workers to help build the advanced manufacturing plant. Now this is interesting: around 40% of taxpayer money will go to subsidize foreign workers’ jobs. After this news the Canadian political class is in turmoil; running, hiding and apologizing, trying to conceal their incompetence. Once again, a badly negotiated contract involving taxpayers money; but who really cares when no one is held responsible? Right? I do hope this is not just the tip of the iceberg, because we do not yet know of any other hidden issues in the contracts with the other two electric vehicles batteries companies. I suppose we will find out eventually. In the meantime, Canada Invests $444m with a company that states publicly that millennials do not want a home. Canada keeps repeating that it is spending billions on new housing, but with whom, and how does it help? Earlier this week in a frenzy to keep power for the liberals, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland announced $1.2 billion worth of investments to build rentals in Toronto. It turns out that over a third of those funds are going into one project at 373 Front St East; rentals planned years ago. Toronto-based Tricon Capital is one of the owners of the 855 unit project. They are best-known for buying and acquiring tens of thousands of single-family homes in a short time and good prices. Canadians may only be vaguely familiar with Tricon. The firm is a multi-billion dollar company, traded on the NYSE and TSX. The company treats single-family homes like Pacman; swallows them all. Their target is to buy 800 homes per month, and they currently have around 38,000 in their portfolio. Then they intend to rent them back to the demographic that can no longer afford those homes. Can any sane person think of a single rational reason for investing taxpayers’ money in these kinds of companies? Perhaps, as the trend continues, the misappropriations will come to light later. Do you see any similarity to the awarding of a federal contract to WE Charity to administer the $912 million Canada Student Service Grant program (CSSG)? We can look forward to the upcoming fall budget and continue to wonder. But how much longer can Canadians take it?ing at an alarming rate, Canada, once a beacon of people’s harmony, is starting to fall apart. Thi What are your thoughts?