Santa Claus parades hold a special place in our hearts, capturing the essence of the holiday season with their joyful and inclusive atmosphere. However, as we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of diversity and inclusion, questions arise about which organizations should participate and why. I was taught from a very young age that politicians should refrain from participating in Santa Claus parades. My parents instilled in me that a politician's presence can politicize an event that should be centered around community and traditions and not be politized. These parades are cherished opportunities for communities to come together, regardless of political affiliations to celebrate the holiday season together. Knowing how politicians have divided our Country within the past couple of years, I too think politicians may inadvertently shift the focus away from the spirit of unity and joy, which is the very substance on which these parades thrive.
At this very moment in time, while I write this article, the anticipation builds as the mayor and fellow council members prepare to join the Santa Claus parade. I for one, after careful consideration, have chosen to remain on standby and uphold my personal morals and beliefs. While I respect their decision to participate, I believe it is essential for individuals to stay true to their convictions. Allowing for diverse perspectives and ensuring that our actions align with our values. By taking this stance, I hope to contribute to a society that encourages open dialogue, understanding, and the freedom to make choices based on personal principles, and not on finding ways to retaliate against our fellow man for having opposing views.
As I mentioned earlier, not only has my upbringing instilled in me to avoid politicizing such festive events, but also being a mother, and an advocate for my community, I have become very mindful of organizations like PFLAG who may contradict different religious and/or cultural teachings, leading many to object to their presence in a traditional event like a Santa Claus parade. Some people are concerned about the appropriateness of exposing children to LGBTQ+ symbols at such a young age could be inappropriate or confusing, while others believe they are advocating for the sexualization of children. Personally, I will at all costs refrain from supporting such a cause and instead, prioritize the well-being and innocence of young ones during these cherished moments.
PFLAG, which offers support and advocacy for LGBTQ+ individuals and their loved ones, mission is undeniably important, yet some argue against their inclusion in Santa Claus parades for a variety of reasons. Some critics argue that Santa Claus parades should primarily focus on maintaining the spirit of the event. These parades are cherished traditions that families attend to experience the magic and wonder of the holiday season. Many believe that introducing topics related to sexuality or gender identity may divert attention from the primary purpose of the parade, potentially diminishing the overall enchanting atmosphere for all attendees, especially young children. Secondly, the desire to avoid controversy plays a significant role in the debate. Discussions surrounding LGBTQ+ rights can be polarizing, and including PFLAG in a Santa Claus parade may unwittingly invite heated debates that detract from the parade's intended message of unity and celebration. Organizers may wish to keep the parade centered on traditional holiday themes that are more universally accepted. Another consideration is the need to respect diverse perspectives. While PFLAG serves as a vital support system, some individuals hold personal or religious beliefs that differ from its mission or message. Santa Claus parades strive to be inclusive, and organizers may aim to avoid alienating or offending any segment of the community by steering clear of potentially divisive topics or groups. Lastly, the appropriateness of content in relation to the audience plays a role in this debate. Santa Claus parades are often attended by families with young children who may not yet be ready to comprehend or discuss topics related to sexuality or gender identity. Some argue that introducing these discussions in an age-appropriate setting, such as secondary schools or community centers, may be more suitable than during a parade primarily targeted towards younger audiences. It is crucial to note that these concerns do not seek to undermine the importance of organizations like PFLAG or their vital advocacy efforts. Instead, they reflect the considerations and perspectives of those who question the inclusion of certain groups in Santa Claus parades. We need to navigate this delicate balance between tradition and inclusion, and it is essential to engage in respectful dialogue and seek compromise. Perhaps, finding alternative platforms to highlight the essential work of organizations like PFLAG, where discussions on LGBTQ+ issues can be more focused and age-appropriate, would be a step towards a harmonious resolution.
To be clear, my perspective is not rooted in any form of transphobia or homophobia. Rather, my concern and those raised by my constituents lies in safeguarding the well-being of children and preserving their childhood innocence by protecting them from any form of sexualization or exposure to adult themes during Santa Claus parades and events.
In the end, the debate surrounding PFLAG's participation in Santa Claus parades serves as a reminder that inclusivity is a complex endeavor. requiring careful consideration of various perspectives and traditions.
"Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"
No comments:
Post a Comment