'I LIVE A DREAM IN A NIGHTMARE WORLD' SERIES

Saturday, January 20, 2024

LET’S TALK NUMBERS

Tahir Khorasanee, LL.M. Senior Associate, Steinbergs LLP I am often asked about the amount of notice or severance employees are entitled to upon termination. Answering that question requires me to first review the employment agreement. Many times, there is an employment agreement, but it contains a termination provision that has been struck down by the courts and is therefore unenforceable. Most of the time, there is no written employment agreement at all. In both instances, the employee's entitlements upon termination are based on several factors, including age, salary, position, and length of service. There are often other considerations as well, which I will discuss in subsequent columns on a biweekly basis. As an example, Nemirovski was employed with Socast Inc for 19 months. He was a project manager and was awarded 19 months by the courts because Socast refused to provide Nemirovski with a reference letter, and his employment agreement had an onerous non-competition clause. In the absence of an enforceable termination provision that limits employees' entitlements to the minimums outlined in the Employment Standards Act, employees are entitled to anywhere between 2 to 30 months' notice or pay in lieu thereof. In some instances, such as with construction workers or those in seasonal industries, there may be no obligations upon termination. Failure to consult a lawyer initially to determine appropriate employee obligations upon termination results in wrongful dismissal claims, increasing costs significantly. The same holds true for employees who are often provided with a termination package paying only the Employment Standards Act minimums, which do not reflect the employee's actual entitlements. For many small businesses, having to pay 2 to 30 months' notice is a significant cost. These costs can easily be avoided if businesses consult a lawyer and conduct a human resource audit, reviewing existing employment agreements and policies, identifying deficiencies, and recommending strategies to limit liabilities. This involves an upfront cost but saves tens of thousands of dollars in the short term and even more in the long term. Employment agreements drafted after the COVID-19 pandemic prioritize reducing costs and providing businesses with flexibility. Many businesses went under during the COVID-19 pandemic, and those that survived did so because they sought legal advice early on. Businesses with employment contracts with an enforceable termination provision limiting the employee to the Employment Standards Act minimum can provide as little as 1 weeks’ notice, as opposed to 2 months to 30 months. In my next column, I will be answering employment law questions from both employees and employers. If you want me to answer your questions, email me at tkhorasanee@steinbergsllp.com. Tahir Khorasanee is currently the Vice President and the incoming president of the Employment Lawyers Association of Ontario. He is a Senior Associate at Steinbergs LLP. Tahir Khorasanee, LL.M. Senior Associate Steinbergs LLP

Conversations in the Community Page: Hidden Agenda’s and False Narratives.

It appears that the City of Pickering is following a familiar playbook employed by governments to control the narrative surrounding certain discussions. The Corporation of The City of Pickering has recently launched a 'Conversations in the Community' page, presenting it as being the sole destination for information on topics of community interest. However, it is essential to recognize that truth, like a flowing river, cannot be contained. It will always find its way to the surface, shining a light on hidden agendas and false narratives. One of the topics being discussed on this platform is the Changerooms at Pickering’s Chestnut Hill Recreation Centre. While the City is now encouraging us to seek facts exclusively from them, we must not forget that numerous individuals, myself included, have been advocating for months to allow individuals the choice to use a gender-specific change room. In 2022 Pickering decided to use a blanket approach that only members over the age of 18 are allowed to use gender-specific changerooms, while members under the age of 18, or non-members of any age are not allowed to use the gender-specific changeroom, and are forced to use the Universal changeroom which is inclusive to all and families. When did it become ok for a government to decide who does or does not have the right to deserve privacy when using vulnerable personal spaces? Concerns have been raised regarding the safety of such spaces, especially considering the increase in incidents worldwide, towards women and children when using these shared personal spaces. This notion of forcing someone into an environment that elicits discomfort and unease is not an approach I am comfortable with, nor am I comfortable with the excuse that because nothing serious has been reported at the Recreation Centre as of yet, they refuse to pursue the issue any further. So to make it clear, unless something terrible happens to an innocent person, nothing is going to change. And those are the facts, but that conversation is not being discussed on the new Community page. Another topic being discussed in this “only get the facts here page” is the concept of 15 minute and smart cities. It is perplexing that the city now presents themselves as experts on this matter when just a couple of weeks ago, they dismissed my having any discussions on the topic during a council meeting. The fact that both the Mayor and the CAO confirmed that they have never had any conversations or received any information on these topics amongst themselves or with any other level of government, is disheartening as Oshawa signed up to be a 15 minute city, quite some time ago. After inquiring about Pickering’s future, the Mayor yelled at me saying “We are not going down the rabbit hole” and “stop on the crazy street”. I was then silenced and not allowed to speak as the Mayor turned off my mic. I’d like to note however, burried within the budget, Two Hundred Thousand Dollars is going towards Pickering’s Smart City initiative for technology and data collection. So now the question arises, why would one choose to deceive the public in the first place, especially when we as a government are supposed to be open and transparent? Personally, I am of the opinion that if the City cannot engage in truthful transparent communications then how can one expect the people of Pickering to trust “Pickering’s Conversations in the Community” page as the sole destination to get the “facts” on any topic. Thus far, the contents in the community page, have not exhibited a resounding sense of truthfulness. Another interesting subject was how the city continues to speak about the Pickering Integrity Commissioner and their role as an “independent and impartial official”. I think it is worth asking the question of how is it possible for an Integrity Commissioner to truly remain unbiased, impartial, or truly independent when they are being paid by the corporation of the City of Pickering? Does this not raise concerns about the objectivity and independence of the office. Not to mention, it was only recently that the Council passed a bylaw that no one can speak to an Integrity Commissioner report as a delegate. That seems pretty odd in a democratic society. I even found myself in the unfortunate position of experiencing the impact of a biased integrity commissioner firsthand, and it was disheartening to witness the lack of regard for ethical standards in fairness, objectivity, and the pursuit of truth, not only in the report but surrounding the process, again being silenced to ask any questions. While I have merely scratched the surface on a few of the issues raised in Pickering’s new “Conversations in the Community page”, I intend to delve deeper into it in future columns and shed light on hidden agendas and false narratives. Presenting to you the other side, not just the government of Pickering’s sole narrative that they want you to believe. John C. Maxwell said it best when he said “Leaders can see what everybody else sees, but can think differently.” Until then, I invite you to follow me on social media. Twitter -@lifelibertylisa Facebook - Councillor Lisa Robinson, YouTube - Lisa Robinson and subscribe to my newsletter at www.lisarobinsonpolitician.ca for further updates, videos, and discussions, and I will see you back here again next week. Sending hugs I will always continue to seek the truth, challenge narratives, and foster meaningful conversations that truly represent the community's interests. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

Hello Doc

By Maurice Brenner Deputy Mayor/Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering When we think of growth, the topic of infrastructure comes to mind. But infrastructure goes well beyond what’s physical which is why this weeks column will focus on how Durham Region is facing a Health Care Crisis caused by a lack of Family Physicians. During the pandemic, we got our first glance at what it was like to not have direct ability to access your family doctor followed by the virtual doctor. Then post pandemic we thought things would go back to normal, but it couldn’t as increasing numbers of our Doctors faced burnout, retirement and an inability to keep up with increasing pressures of growth. Today, 24.3% of Durham residents do not have access to a family doctor. Durham needs 145 new Family Physicians. When we put the City of Pickering under the microscope 25.2% of residents do not have access to a family doctor equaling a shortage of 19 Family Physicians. But Pickering is not alone, at this weeks Durham Regional Committee of the Whole, the Durham Physician Engagement Team reported similar alarming trends across the Region in every Municipality. Adding to the problem is a lack of Family Health Teams with only 2 across the entire Region with one in Pickering and one in Scugog. In an effort to address this crisis Durham and all 8 lower tier Municipalities need a coordinated approach for recruitment and need to band together to pressure the Province of Ontario to create and fund more Family Health Teams To learn more about our Doctor Shortage and the recommendations for moving forward check out Report #2024-COW-2 available on the Durham Region Website and watch for this item appearing on the agendas of your lower tie Municipality.

BRAVO TO THE RED CROSS ORCHARD PARK NY

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States This past week, I was transported in time to a time in America where all was good and fair. A time when you could smell apple pie in the air even thought no one was baking. That warm fuzzy feeling that only pure wholesomeness can offer. Ok, let me explain. This past week. I passed by Buffalo, NY. as I do every month. This time it was different. The highway I was to go on was closed due to a real bad storm blowing from Lake Erie. I decided to take the side roads. All was going well until such time as the wind Gods decided to dump four feet in 10 minutes. Life became strange. I was the only one on the road. With the exception of snow plows. It got so bad I had to pull off in a gas station parking lot. The wind was blowing hard and you could barely see your hand infront of your face. As I waited the storm out. A state trooper pulls behind me and informs me that there was a travel ban and that I was not supposed to be on the road. The officer beyond nice. He directed me to a warming center at Orchard Park Middle school. I never been to a ‘warming center’. I was preparing for the worst. Instead, I was transported back to the 50’s. The people at the center were beyond friendly. Beyond courteous and helpful. I was shocked. I felt I was in a ‘LEAVE IT TO BEAVER’ episode. Everyone at this center were so attentive and caring. It blew my mind. As we waited out the storm. It appeared it was Canadian night at the Center as most of the occupants were from Canada. Some had driven off the road into ditches others car break down. My mission for that day was to get from point A to B. I decided to coordinate intel on road conditions and radar weather patterns. Cross reference them with eye witness on road conditions. I also had to keep in mind the fact that if I did leave the safety of this sanctuary. I would face a fine and possible towing charges if in a wreck. The more I stayed the more comfortable I felt. The red cross volunteers even offered me an IMP. This further blew my mind. IMP (Individual Meal Pack). Believe it or not. Ravioli in a bag... Wow. Finally when the intel was in and the conditions looked favorable to continue my journey I took that leap of faith and connected with my highway. Even thought still closed it was plowed. I just like to say thank you, thank you to all the volunteers that night. I felt really at home. Thank you for the humanity, hospitality and the welcoming attitude and feeling. I can’t say thank you enough. Great work. I truly appreciated.

Winter Sitting—What’s Up in the House of Commons?

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East After a long vacation MPs head back to the Hill, to work on the bills that are still being debated or awaiting debate to begin. As in every winter session of Parliament, follow-up work is to be done. The House of Commons witnessed its fair share of chaos during last year's fall sitting. Speaker Anthony Rota resigned in disgrace after recognizing a war veteran who fought alongside the Nazis as a "Canadian hero." His replacement, Greg Fergus, also faced criticism for appearing in a video tribute to an Ontario Liberal MPP while wearing his Speaker's robes. In addition, Government House Leader Karina Gould has begun her maternity leave, leaving Government Whip Steve MacKinnon to oversee the legislative agenda in her absence. Housing, affordability, and the economy in general, continue to be major concerns. However, there seems to be a stalemate, with the Liberal government trying to find solutions but finding themselves overwhelmed by issues. A more comprehensive approach to strengthening Canada's national security legal framework appears to be underway. The promised online harms legislation is still delayed. With responsibility for the file shifting from Canadian Heritage to the Department of Justice, the government seems to be slow in calming rising antisemitism in the country. Pharmacare legislation that New Democrats demanded as part of their supply and confidence agreement with the government has yet to be tabled. The rest is work as usual, with motherhood legislation waiting to be approved. Notably, there is nothing about the real issues confronting the country. Interest in Canada’s science and industrial development has eluded current House of Commons legislators. At present, there are no MPs who understand the crucial role that applied science can play in the development of Canada. We are lost in space on this file. For example: once a leader in nuclear science and associated industries, today Canada is far behind other nations. A Chinese company has developed a nuclear battery that could keep your phone running for 50 years without recharging. Betavolt Technology claims to have successfully miniaturized atomic energy batteries, with dimensions that measure less than a coin at 15 x 15 x 5mm. The compact battery uses the radioactive isotope Nickel 63 to generate 100 microwatts and a voltage of 3V of electricity through the process of radioactive decay. Betavolt plans to mass-produce them for commercial devices like phones and drones, but also states nuclear batteries could be used for aerospace equipment, medical equipment, advanced sensors and micro-robots. The company is presently working hard to design multiple atomic batteries that could power automotive technology, as well as AI systems just to name a few. The advantages of atomic energy batteries are their lightweight, long service life, high energy density, and ability to work normally under extreme temperatures (-60 to 120oC). The company seems confident that its development is way ahead of European and American scientific research institutions and enterprises. My question: Where is Canada? It is quite clear that politicians invested in costly EV batteries for cars produced by foreign design and with foreign workers on Canadian soil, are not au current. Wouldn’t it be better to support Canadian scientific development? Both for the environment and our economy? No wonder Canada’s economic future looks grim. Lagging productivity means a declining standard of living and the emigration of our best and brightest. Let us face reality; Canada’s per capita GDP has yet to return to its pre-pandemic level. Indeed, it has been declining. The implications of this lack of productivity growth for our long-term standard of living are dire. The reasons for this can be summarized across five closely interconnected areas: unprecedented population growth, capital investment decline, neglected investment in research and development, structural economic issues, and finally, the policy environment. More people could potentially fuel extensive economic growth, but unless capital investment also grows to boost productivity, economic growth will not follow. Given our population growth rates, we would need to devote nearly 30 percent of our GDP to capital formation. That has not happened in Canada since the wheat boom era of the early 1900s—incidentally also the era of Canada’s fastest population growth. However, the quality and composition of investment also matters, and Canada’s spending on research and development as a share of its GDP has been declining for the last two decades. As a share of its GDP, Canada spends about half that of the U.S., spending less than any other G-7 country. How long will that policy keep us in the G-7? Fossilized structural economic issues persist, and despite the country’s population doubling over the last forty years, our markets are apparently still “too small” to allow for more competition. Combine this with provincial and federal implementation and regulatory environments that have raised the cost of starting just about anything, and you have a recipe for long-term economic decay. The final drop in the bucket in explaining our productivity malaise is a Canadian policy environment, which can be described as frozen in space federalism. At its best, Canadian federalism co-ordinates regional economic policies and practices to promote overall Canadian economic performance. At its worst, Canadian federalism can be a petulant collective of myopic jurisdictions operating at cross-purposes that frustrate any attempts at national coordination. Canada’s provinces and the federal government have become increasingly prone to bickering. Canadian federalism in action has Ottawa controlling the levers of immigration and using this power to increase the population to address aging populations and labour shortages. Unfortunately, they have not considered the consequences on health services and housing stock. The provinces control health and education services but in the wake of rising population and demand both sectors are highly stressed and finding it hard to cope. Then there are the municipalities, which control the key levers for land zoning and housing construction. Yet, despite what seems to be a roaring demand for housing, they are moving slowly, if at all. Canada’s economic strategy seems to have focused on increasing population size while assuming that anything needed to boost productivity would simply take care of itself. (Like Trudeau’s budget?) As a result, we now have a growing population and a bigger market but less competition, resulting in higher prices and fewer services. We are spending more on health and education, but reaping hallway health care and students with declining test scores. Are we really getting our money’s worth? The long-term implications of Canada’s falling per capita GDP is a declining standard of living and ultimately the out-migration of the best and brightest. We are on track to becoming a poorer country with a more fractious political system unable to get things done. Is this the country we want for our children? by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East After a long vacation MPs head back to the Hill, to work on the bills that are still being debated or awaiting debate to begin. As in every winter session of Parliament, follow-up work is to be done. The House of Commons witnessed its fair share of chaos during last year's fall sitting. Speaker Anthony Rota resigned in disgrace after recognizing a war veteran who fought alongside the Nazis as a "Canadian hero." His replacement, Greg Fergus, also faced criticism for appearing in a video tribute to an Ontario Liberal MPP while wearing his Speaker's robes. In addition, Government House Leader Karina Gould has begun her maternity leave, leaving Government Whip Steve MacKinnon to oversee the legislative agenda in her absence. Housing, affordability, and the economy in general, continue to be major concerns. However, there seems to be a stalemate, with the Liberal government trying to find solutions but finding themselves overwhelmed by issues. A more comprehensive approach to strengthening Canada's national security legal framework appears to be underway. The promised online harms legislation is still delayed. With responsibility for the file shifting from Canadian Heritage to the Department of Justice, the government seems to be slow in calming rising antisemitism in the country. Pharmacare legislation that New Democrats demanded as part of their supply and confidence agreement with the government has yet to be tabled. The rest is work as usual, with motherhood legislation waiting to be approved. Notably, there is nothing about the real issues confronting the country. Interest in Canada’s science and industrial development has eluded current House of Commons legislators. At present, there are no MPs who understand the crucial role that applied science can play in the development of Canada. We are lost in space on this file. For example: once a leader in nuclear science and associated industries, today Canada is far behind other nations. A Chinese company has developed a nuclear battery that could keep your phone running for 50 years without recharging. Betavolt Technology claims to have successfully miniaturized atomic energy batteries, with dimensions that measure less than a coin at 15 x 15 x 5mm. The compact battery uses the radioactive isotope Nickel 63 to generate 100 microwatts and a voltage of 3V of electricity through the process of radioactive decay. Betavolt plans to mass-produce them for commercial devices like phones and drones, but also states nuclear batteries could be used for aerospace equipment, medical equipment, advanced sensors and micro-robots. The company is presently working hard to design multiple atomic batteries that could power automotive technology, as well as AI systems just to name a few. The advantages of atomic energy batteries are their lightweight, long service life, high energy density, and ability to work normally under extreme temperatures (-60 to 120oC). The company seems confident that its development is way ahead of European and American scientific research institutions and enterprises. My question: Where is Canada? It is quite clear that politicians invested in costly EV batteries for cars produced by foreign design and with foreign workers on Canadian soil, are not au current. Wouldn’t it be better to support Canadian scientific development? Both for the environment and our economy? No wonder Canada’s economic future looks grim. Lagging productivity means a declining standard of living and the emigration of our best and brightest. Let us face reality; Canada’s per capita GDP has yet to return to its pre-pandemic level. Indeed, it has been declining. The implications of this lack of productivity growth for our long-term standard of living are dire. The reasons for this can be summarized across five closely interconnected areas: unprecedented population growth, capital investment decline, neglected investment in research and development, structural economic issues, and finally, the policy environment. More people could potentially fuel extensive economic growth, but unless capital investment also grows to boost productivity, economic growth will not follow. Given our population growth rates, we would need to devote nearly 30 percent of our GDP to capital formation. That has not happened in Canada since the wheat boom era of the early 1900s—incidentally also the era of Canada’s fastest population growth. However, the quality and composition of investment also matters, and Canada’s spending on research and development as a share of its GDP has been declining for the last two decades. As a share of its GDP, Canada spends about half that of the U.S., spending less than any other G-7 country. How long will that policy keep us in the G-7? Fossilized structural economic issues persist, and despite the country’s population doubling over the last forty years, our markets are apparently still “too small” to allow for more competition. Combine this with provincial and federal implementation and regulatory environments that have raised the cost of starting just about anything, and you have a recipe for long-term economic decay. The final drop in the bucket in explaining our productivity malaise is a Canadian policy environment, which can be described as frozen in space federalism. At its best, Canadian federalism co-ordinates regional economic policies and practices to promote overall Canadian economic performance. At its worst, Canadian federalism can be a petulant collective of myopic jurisdictions operating at cross-purposes that frustrate any attempts at national coordination. Canada’s provinces and the federal government have become increasingly prone to bickering. Canadian federalism in action has Ottawa controlling the levers of immigration and using this power to increase the population to address aging populations and labour shortages. Unfortunately, they have not considered the consequences on health services and housing stock. The provinces control health and education services but in the wake of rising population and demand both sectors are highly stressed and finding it hard to cope. Then there are the municipalities, which control the key levers for land zoning and housing construction. Yet, despite what seems to be a roaring demand for housing, they are moving slowly, if at all. Canada’s economic strategy seems to have focused on increasing population size while assuming that anything needed to boost productivity would simply take care of itself. (Like Trudeau’s budget?) As a result, we now have a growing population and a bigger market but less competition, resulting in higher prices and fewer services. We are spending more on health and education, but reaping hallway health care and students with declining test scores. Are we really getting our money’s worth? The long-term implications of Canada’s falling per capita GDP is a declining standard of living and ultimately the out-migration of the best and brightest. We are on track to becoming a poorer country with a more fractious political system unable to get things done. Is this the country we want for our children?

UNDERSTANDING, EMPLOYERS ARE SKITTISH

Understandably, Employers Are Skittish When Hiring. Job Seekers Need to Ease Their Concerns. By Nick Kossovan 15 years ago (I'm ballparking), employers hired after two or three interviews. Today, it's common to have five to seven interviews. I seldom encounter a job seeker who empathizes with employers and grasps that hiring is a significant risk, thus understanding why employers tend to be skittish when hiring. Employers are risk-averse. Hiring involves assuming a liability risk. Candidates often, without realizing it, present themselves in a way that gives employers the impression that hiring them would be risky. Will the candidate... · be a fit? · be easy to manage? · look after the company's best interest? · make them (the hiring manager) look good? Add to the above the persistent talk of a looming recession, along with AI rapidly advancing; thus, AI may soon be able to fill the current vacancy. It's no wonder why employers are hyper-cautious when hiring. Think AI won't have an impact on jobs? 37% of 750 business leaders surveyed by ResumeBuilder said AI replaced workers in 2023. 44% predict AI efficiency will lead to layoffs in 2024. The good news is that 96% of companies hiring in 2024 say candidates will benefit from having AI skills. In a recent column, I wrote that I consider AI a human replacement tool, not a productivity tool. As AI adoption increases, employers will closely monitor their employees' productivity versus AI's and lean towards which best serves their self-interests. No employer wants to hire a candidate only to let them go a short time later. "Sorry, Bob, the second and third quarters weren't as strong as we'd hoped; unfortunately, we need to let you go." Today's economic and political climate, combined with seismic changes in the psyches of the younger generation, which are adding fuel to the always-existing discourse between employees and employers, explains why employers hire with extreme caution. As a job seeker, you need to figure out ways to present yourself as a candidate who isn't high-risk. Write the following quote on a Post-it Note and place it where you'll see it daily while job hunting. "Business is all about solving people's problems — at a profit." - Paul Marsden, British writer, businessman and former politician. Job searching is about selling yourself as the solution to an employer's problem. What's the employer's problem? Read the job description. Ask yourself: Why does this position exist? Why was it created? When you answer these questions, you are forced to focus on what the employer wants rather than what you want. Instead of focusing on what you want, get deeply and intensely curious about the employer's needs and wants, increasing revenue and reducing costs being the obvious. (READ: creating a profit ) What do you offer employers that are tangible and measurable that'll facilitate their earnings and, therefore, are worth paying for? If an employer hired you, what kind of ROI would they receive? Employers don't give money to their employees because they want it or feel they deserve it. Employers aren't concerned with what their employees want or feel they deserve. Employees are paid by their employers in exchange for results that help them achieve their business goals. You can gain a significant advantage over your competitors by understanding and empathizing with the risks employers take when hiring. "If there is any one secret of success, it lies in the ability to get the other person's point of view and see things from his angle as well as your own." - Henry Ford In a time of economic uncertainty, rapid technological advancement, and cultural fit becoming increasingly important, job seekers need to address these factors directly. · Economic uncertainty Hyperinflation is shifting consumer behaviour. Geopolitical tensions are becoming more pronounced. There's constant talk of a recession looming. We live in an angst-filled world. In order to ease employers' concerns about where the economy is heading, candidates must demonstrate flexible problem-solving skills and the ability to adapt to changing circumstances. To be seen as someone who can help the company weather difficult times, prepare a couple of STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) stories demonstrating you have handled challenging situations or helped your employer through tough times. · Technological advancement It's no longer enough to know the basics of Word and Excel. Today, employers expect their employees to be able to proficiently use multiple tech tools, such as data analysis, online collaboration, project management and, of late, AI prompting. Using tech tools (e.g., QR code, Zoom, Slack) throughout your job search shows that you are tech-savvy without having to say so. · Cultural fit The importance of cultural fit is greater than ever. The slightest sign that you won't fit in - you don't align with the company's values, mission, or work culture - will end your candidacy. By researching the organization's culture, mission, and values, you can then position yourself to demonstrate how your values and work style match the organization's mission and culture. Showing enthusiasm for the company's objectives and illustrating experiences (STAR stories) that resonate with its culture will ease employers' concerns about cultural compatibility. Understanding and mitigating employers' hiring concerns will help you stand out in today's fiercely competitive job market. ___________________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

TOMORROW

TOMORROW By Dale Jodoin Picture this: It's the future, and every single car you see is powered by electricity. No more gas stations, just places to charge your car, like a giant phone on wheels. Politicians are pushing hard for this change. They say it's better for the planet, and that sounds great, right? But there's a big issue they're not talking about, and it's something we all need to understand, especially if you're in high school and thinking about the kind of world you'll be living in soon. First, let’s tackle the winter problem. Imagine it's super cold, like 30 degrees below zero. Now, in this electric car future, something weird happens when it gets this cold: electric cars might not work as well. Why? Batteries, like the ones in these cars, don’t like extreme cold. They lose power faster, and sometimes, they just can't handle it. It gets worse. The places where you charge these cars might stop working too. Why? Well, when everyone in town is trying to keep their houses warm, cook dinner, and charge their cars all at the same time, the electricity grid (that's the system that gives us all power) gets overwhelmed. It's like when everyone in your house is trying to use the Wi-Fi at the same time, and it gets really slow, except this is way more serious. In some places, this isn’t just a future problem. It’s happening now. In really cold areas, people are seeing these issues firsthand. If electric cars can't drive because it's too cold, how will people get to work or school? What about getting food delivered to stores? In the worst cases, some people might even get dangerously cold in their homes if the power goes out. But wait, there's more. Think about businesses and jobs. If companies know that their electric trucks can't make deliveries in cold weather, they might decide not to operate in those areas. What does that mean? Fewer jobs, less business, and more problems for people living there. So, why are politicians so focused on pushing for all these electric vehicles without making sure our electricity can handle it? It seems like they’re so excited about the idea of a clean, electric future that they're not stopping to think about these very real problems. In about 30 years, what if places like Russia or the Philippines, who might stick with oil and gas, become more attractive for jobs? They didn’t jump fully into this all-electric idea, so they might not face these same issues. Meanwhile, the politicians who made the all-electric rules might just leave office and not have to deal with the consequences of their decisions. This is where we come in. As students, as future voters, and as people who will live in this world, we need to start asking tough questions. These politicians are making decisions that affect our future, but are they really thinking it through? It's not just about being trendy with technology; it's about making sure these new ideas work for everyone, everywhere, even when it's freezing outside. We need to make sure that the people in charge are planning for things like upgrading our electricity grids so they can handle the extra load, and figuring out how to make electric cars work in the cold. It’s not enough to just say “let's switch to electric cars” without having a solid plan to make sure it all works. It’s super important to start talking about these issues with friends, family, and teachers. Understand the big picture, and when it's time for you to vote, remember these discussions. We should support leaders who think about both the cool new tech and the practical stuff, like making sure we can still get around when it's cold outside. The bottom line is, the future with electric cars can be awesome, but only if we plan it right. It's not just about moving away from gas cars; it's about making sure our future is ready for everything – even a super chilly winter. Let's learn from these challenges and push for a future that's not just cool and electric, but also smart and ready for real-world problems.

ROCKING THE BOAT

Rocking The Boat from Wayne & Tamara I work in a factory, and we have supervisors who play favorites. They have about six girls who can do no wrong, and they have easier jobs than the rest of us. These girls go out after work to bars, and that is why they are in with the supervisors. The boss over these supervisors will not do anything because his boss is the father of one of these supervisors. So long as “Daddy boss” is still there, this boss will not do anything. One girl played around and made the machinery malfunction for an operator, but she didn’t get into trouble because of the favoritism. Do we go to the owner of the company with a complaint on why these bosses will not fix this mess? Carol Carol, we will not tell you that you should go to the owner. What we will tell you is how this usually plays out. Some things are worth doing because you feel they are the right thing to do, even when you know they will not succeed. As a rule, whistleblowers do not succeed. Complaining or whistleblowing makes you the problem, instead of the problem you are calling attention to. Human beings are social animals, and family and social connections in the workplace usually count for more than merit or truth. Truth is very weak. There is nothing pushing it. It can’t stand up to people pushing their own agenda. The one place where truth, fact, and objectivity are supposed to rule is science, but even in science it is a problem. The physicist Max Planck once observed that an important scientific innovation is usually accepted not because people readily accept its truth, but because the older generation of opponents grows old and dies off. Carol, you have three options: you can overlook the unfairness and become immune to it, you can seek other employment, or you can try to fix the problem. Fixing the problem is the solution least likely to occur. In all probability, your workplace is a boat the owner does not want rocked. Wayne & Tamara The Quality Of Mercy I am Ali from Pakistan, and I need your help on a weird issue. First, let me tell you something about me. I am a student of information technology. I am not from a rich family, but our family is a respected one. When I turned 20, I left my family for studies in computer science. Okay, now here started the problem. I used to use the Internet as a resource for knowledge, but two years ago I got free time and started chatting online. I am not very good talking to girls, at least maybe not to the sharp ones. I do not know the exact reason, but one can be that I am a little shy and can’t talk the talk. I met a girl online, and we shared a lot. At least, I did. But I lied to her. Out of nowhere, though, I was in love with her. I told her some mushy lines because it was hurting to think of her not in my life. Then I told her I lied to her. It was a difficult time because she was so angry, but I finally managed to get her mercy. Is she really okay with me? How do we go back to our old chat sessions we both used to enjoy? Ali Ali, Mark Twain said, “If you tell the truth, you don’t have anything to remember.” You also don’t have anything to apologize for or explain away. You may have gained her mercy, but what is the quality of her mercy? Ask yourself how you would feel if she lied to you. Chances are, you would still doubt her. How do you go back to the old familiarity and trust, when that was interwoven with lies? Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com

Postbiotics for the Gut, Body, and Brain

By Common Sense Health – W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Last week’s column suggested we are minnows in the grand life adventure. This week we’ll look at little beings in our bellies that seem to have outsized influence. What is it about these microscopic components of the gut-brain connection that leads us to thinking that a postbiotic supplement might be a very good investment. The gut microbiome is like a neighbourhood of friends you carry around in and on your body for your entire life. Just as the environment outside your body and the way you live your life have consequences for your well-being, this gooey world in your gut has enormous impact on your health, from head to toe and cradle to grave. What exactly is it? The gut-brain microbiome refers to a bustling two-way street between the gastrointestinal tract and the brain, fueled in part by the vast community of microorganisms residing in the gut. In 1972, microbiologist Thomas Luckey estimated the human gut is home to 100 trillion microorganisms – bacteria, viruses, fungi, and more. They make mighty contributions to brain health. About 90-95% of the body's serotonin, a neurotransmitter associated with mood regulation, is produced in the gut. Imbalances in the gut microbiome have been linked to various mental health conditions, including anxiety, depression, and stress-related disorders. Neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease have also been associated with alterations in the gut microbiota. How they work is being studied, but there seems to be a role in the progression of disease. The gut microbiome, when working well, helps regulate the immune system too by distinguishing between harmful pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. When failing to perform, immune systems weaken, and inflammation goes unchecked. Chronic inflammation could be a sign of an unhealthy gut microbiome. This kind of inflammation has been implicated in various diseases, including those affecting the brain. Understanding this dynamic interplay between the gut and the brain is a rapidly evolving area of research, and there is still much to learn about the specifics of how the microbiome influences brain function and vice versa. However, it is increasingly clear that maintaining a healthy gut microbiome is important for overall health, including for mental and neurological health. Here’s the interesting part. Unlike our lot as minnows in the great ocean of life, we can influence our body’s inner ocean with the right fuel to achieve a better balance in the microbiome. A healthy gut will have ample communities of probiotics (healthy bacteria that convert fiber into beneficial compounds), prebiotics (a group of nutrients, mainly fiber, that feed these healthy bacteria), and postbiotics (bioactive compounds that offer important benefits to your body). A healthy individual eating a diet that includes plenty of fiber and essential nutrients should enjoy a robust, well-functioning gut. But many people are kidding themselves as they consume foods high in animal proteins, sugar, salt, and saturated fat – just the ticket to punish gut bacteria and invite inflammation and chronic disorders. Yet, as healthy food prices remain high, getting enough fiber and optimal nutrition is hard, even if you are trying to make the right choices. Is the cost of a supplement the right investment? If a boost to your microbiome gives you a better chance at reducing the risk of conditions like dementia, it’s money well spent. Postbiotics are a relatively new option, offering targeted formulas that delivery more efficacy in achieving health benefits. Visit your local health food store and find out why experts recommend one product over another. Be sure to purchase from trusted sources offering products containing high quality natural ingredients backed by independent clinical studies.. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Saturday, January 13, 2024

TALKING CITY OF OSHAWA BY-LAW

Tahir Khorasanee, LL.M. Senior Associate, Steinbergs LLP There is an unprecedent housing crisis in Canada, the interest rate and inflation are the highest they have been in three decades and the City of Oshawa voted down a city-wide extension of the rental housing program. A resolution that targets its working class and the poor, the very people that built this city with their blood, tears and toil. As the winds of economic uncertainty sweep through Oshawa, the residents and concerned citizens, urgently bring forth a plea that transcends signatures on paper – it's a call for empathy, a call for change. At the center of our concerns lies the pressing need to reconsider and abolish the bylaw that prohibits residents from safely renting their basements. Amidst the numerical intricacies and policy debates, it is crucial to remember that behind every statistic, there is a human story. Let's put a face to these statistics. Take, for instance, the Smith family, who, after years of hard work and savings, find themselves on the verge of losing their home due to the skyrocketing interest rates. Or consider Sarah, a single mother desperately searching for an affordable place to rent while fearing eviction from her current residence. In the face of these daunting numbers, the basement rental bylaw stands as an additional barrier to housing security. By prohibiting the safe rental of basements, the bylaw not only exacerbates the challenges faced by struggling homeowners but also displaces renters, pushing them further into the abyss of limited affordable housing options. Meet David, a father of three, who, despite working two jobs, is grappling with the fear of foreclosure. His basement, a potential source of supplemental income, remains locked due to the current bylaw. Or hear the story of Rachel, a recent graduate burdened with student loans, desperately seeking a place she can afford, only to find the doors of available basement units barred. In this time of crisis, abolishing the basement rental bylaw is not just a policy adjustment; it's an act of compassion and shared responsibility. It is an acknowledgment that policies have a profound impact on the lives of real people – people like the Smiths, Sarah, David, and Rachel. The economic challenges facing Oshawa demand innovative solutions. According to recent studies, cities that embrace inclusive housing policies experience not only economic growth but also enhanced community well-being. Abolishing the basement rental bylaw is a step toward fostering an environment that supports housing accessibility for all, regardless of economic status. Oshawa has the opportunity to lead by example, showing that it is possible to balance economic viability with compassion. Let our city be a beacon of change, unlocking doors for its citizens and ensuring a brighter, more equitable future. To advocate for change, please go online and sign this petition: https://www.change.org/p/petition-to-abolish-oshawa-s-basement-rental-bylaw-for-the-sake-of-housing-accessibility?recruiter=625710911&recruited_by_id=6ce68e40-a6d6-11e6-b8a9-e5b88bb72844&utm_source=share_petition&utm_campaign=share_for_starters_page&utm_medium=copylink

THE BUDGET

THE BUDGET By Maurice Brenner Deputy Mayor/Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering With the Municipal Budget process now underway across Municipalities across Durham Region, I wanted to focus this weeks column on one of the core services that Municipalities fund. “Public Libraries” and why its so important that this public service is not overlooked. In Ontario, Public Libraries are governed under the Public Libraries Act, while Municipalities appoint Library Boards, the Legislation is designed that they operate independent of the shareholder Municipality that funds them with all services provided free. To access all that is free from a Public Library is to become a member which is free. And with your membership it opens the door to much more than just books. Quoting Albert Einstein “ The only thing that you absolutely have to know, is the location of the library.” If Einstein was alive today, he would have expanded what he meant since Libraries today can be accessed physically or digitally on-line. Libraries throughout history has provided important/creative resources that contributes to experiencing and lifelong long learning and needs to be seen as a community asset filled with , knowledge. So as your Municipality is setting its budgets and you ask yourself why are we using taxpayers money to fund Libraries, Here are some of my thoughts as to what I believe makes them a worthwhile investment. 1. Libraries contributes to local businesses by creating opportunities through services like maker space and abilities to access free computers and access to the internet. It provides forums to host business meetings in a private digital work space. 2. It has a data base made up of its members that enables ongoing feedback, it utilizes community outreach programs in parks, shopping facilities and events that the Municipality offers. Librarians do not just shuffle books but performs miracles daily through their wisdom. 3. Libraries are the keepers of history, be it books, magazines and what is now becoming extinct newspaper archives. 4. While the Internet can deliver real time information, it does not provide context. Libraries provide tools to evaluate information enabling their members to dig deeper into topics to understand the complexity of issues with up-to-date information. Libraries offers choices. 5. Even with technological advances, Books continue to be major reason to visit the library – whether those books are print, audio, large print, or other formats. 6. Libraries offer a range of programs for everyone such as children’s story time, makerspaces that provides creative learning opportunities, places to stimulate the minds of older adults. Libraries are a complete free community resource. 7. Libraries offer free use of computers and wifi,which enables barrier free access and ability to research, and apply for jobs, 8. Accessibility. Libraries are barrier free , a place (physical and virtual) to access information that keeps members informed 9. In many Municipalities, Libraries provide public service such as warming areas, and places to host hot meals for those that are homeless So this year while financial resources continues to be a challenge for all of us, let’s not forget about our Public Libraries and why this Free Public Service continues to need Municipal funding for its day to day operations. Libraries are more than just bricks and mortar.

SHAME ON YOU CARTER

Canada looking forward to 2024

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The year just beginning could be an interesting one, with turning points in politics, economics and culture, provided that common sense and moral clarity will prevail both here and abroad. Frankly, the geopolitical situation in the world is most concerning. The two regional wars in Ukraine and Gaza have the potential to spread, provoking direct confrontation between NATO and the western democracies in general, versus Russia, Iran, North Korea and China. Ukraine now stands to lose significant international interest and support. In the United States in particular, it has become a distant second (and increasingly third or lower) policy priority. The conflict is likely to escalate with unforeseen consequences. In the conflict between Israel and Hamas, there is no obvious way to end the fighting. Whatever the military outcome, a dramatic increase in radicalization is a certainty. On the one hand, the Israeli Jews feel globally isolated and even hated after facing the worst violence against them since the Holocaust. On the other hand, the Palestinians face what they consider a genocide. With no opportunities for peace and no prospect of escape, this situation has the potential of developing into a wider conflict in the region. Deep and dangerous political divisions over the conflict permeate the Middle East and run across over one billion people in the broader Muslim world, not to mention the United States and Europe. Some new and problematic situations are developing in the Arabian Sea, in South America between Venezuela and Guyana, not to mention the increasing tensions in the South China Sea. None of these major military conflicts has adequate guardrails preventing them from getting worse. Most problematically, none of the belligerents agrees on what they are fighting over. Upcoming elections in 2024 pose additional challenges. Fully one-third of the global population will go to the polls this year. However, in terms of world security, stability and outlook, the unprecedentedly dysfunctional US election will be the most consequential by far. The outcome will affect the fate of 8 billion people, and only 160 million Americans will have a say in it. The winner will be decided by just tens of thousands of voters in a handful of swing states. The losing side, whether Democrat or Republican, will consider the outcome illegitimate and will not be prepared to accept it. One of the most powerful countries in the world faces critical challenges to its core political institutions: free and fair elections, the peaceful transfer of power, and the checks and balances provided by the separation of powers. The political state of the union is troubled indeed. In the face of all this turmoil, Canada has generally been missing in action on the international scene. Even worse, our country has sometimes undermined its own international standing. To sit at the international table requires a moral compass, professionalism, determination and not being a military free-rider. Canada’s decision to act as a self-important virtue-signaller irritates allies who must shoulder our share of the burden, as well as third-world countries who see Canada’s posturing as post-colonial arrogance. On the domestic scene, Canada is facing a challenging year both economically and politically. There is a real prospect of recession and a future depreciation of the standard of living if no measures are taken. It seems that the Liberal government has lost its direction; overwhelmed by the issues, it seems to have no solution for upcoming events, and continues to be influenced by the policies of the World Economic Forum (WEF). The World Economic Forum, which will meet in session in mid January, continues to try to influence global governmental, industrial and social agendas. Its “Great Reset” envisages a new economic and social order based on a futuristic globalist approach that would reduce national interests through pervasive oversight mechanisms, including central bank digital currencies. In essence, it is encouraging woke social and economic policies in order to implement a new futuristic globalist world order following a trend in line with “deja vue” Marxist theories but certainly more sophisticated and deceiving. Forum chairman Klaus Schwab assured elite Davos attendees that “The future belongs to us”. Comforting words for those jealously guarding their influence and accustomed to ignoring rules that apply only to the plebe. Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney are on the WEF board of trustees and Justin Trudeau’s Liberal party certainly reflects its centre-left technocratic view. On the economic front, Canadians’ personal prosperity, as measured by GDP per capita, is projected to decline this year by more than two per cent. To address affordability and the dismal outlook for long-term productivity, the federal government needs to shift focus from identity politics and climate obsession to economic growth, fiscal responsibility and raising Canadians’ standard of living. In the hope that this year will be a better one and our politicians will put the national interest and the wellbeing of our citizens in the forefront, let us be optimistic. The year has just started. I hope you will take all these thoughts in the spirit they are intended: We have entered a year of grave concern, but supported by the hope that tough times bring out the best in us. Happy New Year 2024!

You Have a Role in Social Change, if You Want It

By Nick Kossovan Damn! Last week, while giving spare change to a homeless person, I forgot to take a selfie. Who knows how many likes I would have received on Instagram! For some reason, no one was videotaping me as I was delivering a food donation to my local food bank. I would have loved to post such a video on Facebook and receive endless digital "way-to-go!" I recently came across a quote by Mark Manson, author of The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck: A Counterintuitive Approach to Living a Good Life, a book I strongly recommend that resonated with me, "Be skeptical of boasts; they are often about the people we wish we were, rather than who we actually are." In Western society, we boast. Our goal is to project an image that will be applauded, envied, and celebrated. You're not your thoughts. You're not defined by what's inside your head or what you tweet, post on Facebook, or say to family and friends. You're what you actually do. Your actions, not your words, advertise who you are. Those who don't speak of their accomplishments and good deeds exude quiet confidence. They seem satisfied knowing they did something kind or accomplished something impressive; as a result, they do not look for external validation. Shifting in high gear — we're in the middle of some serious social surgery. I question those whose most radical act is temporarily changing their profile picture on Facebook. You have probably done this. We have the virtue-signalling down pat and the talk, saying what we think will make us fit in. Especially in our younger years, we go along to get along. Currently, I'm seeing two key insights into social behaviour. First, people conform to other people's actions and opinions; they often say and do what others say and do. Second, when it comes to many issues, most people don't know what others think, making conformity a guessing game. Case in point, in 2016, polls predicted Hilary Clinton would be the 45th President of the United States, and then Donald Trump won. Evidently, many Trump supporters kept their support to themselves. Our inability to have a civil discourse without judging, labelling, and insulting those with opposing viewpoints and beliefs creates silent majorities who make themselves heard in voting booths. I believe the silent majority will win the next Canadian federal election. What are you afraid to say because you fear being labelled? As social norms shift, individuals shift with them, metaphorically adopting popular opinions and behaviours and dropping ones that fall out of style. Let's not kid ourselves; it's all about style and not what serves our collective best interest, which defaults to the sick game of identity politics. The left exploits those they characterize as being oppressed, while the right plays on nationalism and cultural pride. The civilized political game is one where you focus on your life and take responsibility for your actions. Imagine what our world would look like if you and I walked our talk. Saying, posting, tweeting, commenting, you care is meaningless. Your actions reveal what you're concerned about. Our planet would be able to breathe again if everyone who claimed to be concerned about climate change adopted an environmentally friendly lifestyle. (READ: consume less) If everyone who claims to be against systemic racism addressed the racism surrounding them, there wouldn't be any systemic racism. If everyone who claims to be appalled by homelessness put their money where their mouth is, homelessness would be eradicated. If everyone who raises a fist against corporate greed stopped supporting corporations with their consumerism, corporations would be more inclined to be good social citizens. There's always been much more talk, acting outraged, fist-raising, finger-pointed, and fashionable protesting than any real action. We know what needs to be done, but we don't do it. The changes we say we want — the examples I gave — don't need government permission to be eradicated or at least mitigated. A shameful truth: we benefit from the social injustices and planet-destroying activities we say offend us. The hypocrisy we use to defend our right to live an undeniably environmentally destructive and financially wasteful first-world lifestyle is astonishing. Google "a smartphone's environmental damage" and see how hypocritical those who claim to care about the environment are, whom I guarantee own a smartphone, along with driving a fuel-burning automobile, using one-use plastic and eating blueberries imported from a different hemisphere. I've yet to meet a self-proclaiming "environmentalist" whose lifestyle had a negligible carbon footprint. Are you really against capitalism if you're using your Apple iPhone to post anti-capitalism rants on a social media platform owned by a billionaire while sipping a Starbucks Cinnamon Dolce Latte? People say, "We stole this land from the natives!" and then continue to live on it. If you are so offended by your ancestral guilt, why not give the land back? Is there any movement to give back large chunks of Canada to its indigenous people? If your white privilege offends you, then why do you continue to take advantage of it? Answer to the above: As I said earlier, we benefit from the social injustices and planet-destroying activities we say we oppose. Hence, we theatrically display outrage — facilitated by social media — while avoiding meaningful change since meaningful change would go against our self-interests. Fiji, Evian, Aquafina, Dasani, Smartwater, Arrowhead, Poland Spring, et al., aren't going to suddenly stop selling bottled water, no matter how much you say bottled water are nails in the environment's coffin. Corporations will stop producing bottled water when people stop buying it. All the garbage floating in our oceans, littering our land, is the result of our consumerism and one-use plastic, neither of which has ever been mandated by any government. Most people avoid responsibility by avoiding taking meaningful action. It's much easier to say you are against corporate greed than it is to not participate in our consumer society, which creates corporations. Values only exist if they're lived. You say you value honest communication and open discourse. Until you've dealt with unpleasant and difficult conversations that you hate hearing in a mature way that allows others to have opinions and beliefs that differ from yours, you don't. What's an uncomfortable conversation you've been avoiding? If you find yourself preaching, tweeting your social consciousness, or offering uninvited opinions, ask yourself why you feel your actions aren't enough to speak for themselves. Your actions have a meaningful role in social change. Your outrage is you going along to get along, which explains our current state of affairs. ___________________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

"Embracing Change: Demystifying AI for a Brighter Future"

By Dale Jodoin In an era where technology evolves at an unprecedented pace, a topic that often stirs public debate is Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI, a concept that once belonged to the realm of science fiction, has now become a tangible part of our daily lives. Yet, with its rise, there's a brewing storm of concern and misunderstanding. This story aims to unravel these fears and showcase AI as a catalyst for positive change, in a language that resonates with the young minds of today. Understanding AI: Beyond the Myths AI, at its core, is a set of computer programs that can mimic human intelligence. Think of it like a really smart robot that can learn, solve problems, and even make decisions. But unlike the menacing robots you see in movies, real AI isn't about taking over the world. It's about making our lives easier and solving complex problems that we face as a society. Why the Fear? The fear of AI often comes from not understanding what it truly is. Movies and TV shows have painted AI as a villain – a force that could outsmart humans and turn against us. But that's far from reality. AI is a tool, much like a hammer or a car. And just like any tool, it's how we use it that matters. AI in Our Lives Today, AI is everywhere – from the smartphones in our pockets to the cars we drive. It helps us find our way using GPS, recommends movies on streaming platforms, and even powers personal assistants like Siri and Alexa. In schools, AI can personalize learning, helping students at different levels get the support they need. It's not about replacing humans but enhancing our abilities and experiences. AI and Jobs: A New Perspective One major concern is that AI will take away jobs. It's true that AI can automate some tasks, but history shows us that with new technology comes new opportunities. Think about the internet; it changed the way we work and created jobs that we couldn't have imagined 30 years ago. AI is likely to do the same, leading to new careers in fields like AI maintenance, programming, and ethical AI development. AI for Good Beyond convenience, AI has the potential to solve some of the world's biggest challenges. In healthcare, AI can help doctors diagnose diseases earlier and with more accuracy. In environmental science, it can predict climate patterns and help in conservation efforts. AI even plays a role in enhancing accessibility for people with disabilities, offering tools for better communication and mobility. Learning and Adapting with AI As AI continues to evolve, it's crucial that we learn and adapt with it. This doesn't mean we all need to become tech experts. Instead, it's about understanding the basics of AI and being open to the changes it brings. Education systems are beginning to include AI in their curriculums, ensuring that the next generation is equipped for a future where AI is the norm. Ethical AI: A Shared Responsibility The ethical use of AI is a hot topic. Just like any powerful tool, there's a responsibility to use AI in ways that are beneficial and not harmful. This means having rules and guidelines to ensure that AI respects our privacy, security, and rights. It's a collective effort that involves governments, companies, and even everyday users. The Future with AI The future with AI is not a dystopian world where robots rule. Instead, it's a world where AI and humans work side by side. AI could free us from mundane tasks, allowing us to focus on creative and meaningful work. It could help us make better decisions, from personal finance to running a city. The possibilities are endless. Conclusion: Embracing AI As we stand on the brink of a new era, it's natural to feel apprehensive about AI. But remember, every major advancement in history, from the printing press to the internet, was met with skepticism. The key is to approach AI with curiosity and an open mind. By understanding AI, we can guide its development in ways that enrich our lives and create a future that's not only high-tech but also high-humanity. So, as we navigate this exciting and uncharted territory, let's not be driven by fear, but by the prospect of what we can achieve when we harness the power of AI for good.

Saturday, January 6, 2024

I AM A VICTIM OF PREJUDICE BY CITY OF OSHAWA

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - As proud small business owner situated in downtown Oshawa for the past 29 years. I always felt a civic duty to do my best for my community. To offer my services and render advice to anyone that asked. through the Central Newspaper I have operated the most successful ‘SHOP LOCAL’ downtown Oshawa campaign in the history of the City. Never expected anything in return. Never receive one ounce of praise or support by our elected officials. At times I felt as they were envious of my successes over the years. I did it out of municipal duty and pride for my city. I much like you reading this work hard 10 - 12 hours at any given day to feed my family and maintain a standard of living where at times it allows me the privilege to extend help to those less fortunate in our community. As you can read to the left of this column. I served my community and will continue to serve. The purpose of this column is one of disappointment, shock and feeling of persecution and or prejudice against me and the good efforts I have put forth through the years from my city the City of Oshawa. According to the City Clerk and the Chief Administrative Officer. Oshawa does not have a newspaper. As per report: presented in this paper pg. 10-11. REALLY. What has the Central been doing for the past 29 years. Situated right downtown Oshawa? I feel as if the City has shown extreme ignorance and prejudice against me. What an insult to me and every small local business. If a clerk and a newly appointed CAO. Two people that hold key positions in the City have no clue of the City paper. We taxpayers are in serious trouble. How many other issues do these two make recommendations to the City that are erroneous. Neither of them ever called and reached out to hear from the local expert on how to proceed with any advertising policy in lieu of Metroland failure. Are we to assume that these two characters have some divine expertise over professionals in the field with over 29 years of experience. The arrogance and the ignorance of Mary Madeiros and Tracy Adams. Shame on you. You failed the people of Oshawa. By the Ontario Municipal Act - A newspaper is: (being a document in printed form, published at regular intervals of a week or less, is circulated to the general public and consists primarily of news of current events of general interest) Question for Madeiros and Adams. Do you even live in Durham? For 29 years you never heard of the Central. When, I have had on other matters numerous conversations with both of you. Their recommendation to city council on the aforementioned report is an insult. A disgrace to any small business operating in Oshawa. An insult to any future business or developer wishing to do business with Oshawa. For the record; The Central Newspaper. A small local business that has served Oshawa and Durham region for over 29 years. The Central publishes every tuesday and delivers to home subscribers across Durham. Available at all reputable convenience stores including all major grocery stores and retail outlets. The Central has build its business on fairness, transparency and integrity. It has numerous awards substantiating creditability within the publishing industry. The difference between fly by niters like the Express, SNAP, SNAP’D, NEIGHBOUR all hand picked magazines not even newspapers that the City wasted your tax dollar and deemed worthy of publishing in.... they are all out of business. Some barely published 2,000 copies and had no paid readership. But they surely reported skewed articles and attended photo opportunities for the elect. How is that they were deemed worthy and The Central is being discriminated so openly? The Central can’t be bought or influenced, much like any reputable publishing company with integrity should operate much like the SUN, STAR and Globe and Mail. The Central during Covid, was given full media accreditation by the Provincial and Federal government as a reliable and respected within the industry news source and as such included in all advertising, notices and articles pertaining to the same. So much so that The Central today works with all major news agencies across the globe. The Central Newspaper with offices in the United States has become a beacon for the communities it represents as a solid, reliable and trustworthy news source. So, then how is it that some city clerk and a CAO of the City fail to acknowledge the same. Do they have more credentials than the Provincial and Federal government and professionals in the publishing industry? NO. IT WAS DONE WITH MALICE, ILL INTENT AND POLITICAL AGENDA. NO ONE CAN BE THAT IGNORANT OF SUCH A HUGE FACT. Where is the Mayor and his pride and support of local businesses. For a city that prides itself on inclusion, anti-bias/prejudice/discrimination. They surely do not practice what they preach. I demand resolve. I demand that the city bring back the old policy and include in it the only still publishing newspaper in Oshawa. The people of Oshawa deserve accountability, transparency and responsible governance. Have pride in your community. SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL BUSINESSES.

DTR AND PUBLIC TRANSIT

By Maurice Brenner Deputy Mayor/Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering Pickering is preparing its 2024 budget under the Strong Mayor’s On January 2nd, users of Durham Region Transit (DRT) where impacted as a result of reductions in level of services including cancelations of routes and locations of bus stops. In todays column I want to focus on the negative impacts of these changes. How is DRT Funded? Public transit is not a profit-based public service, with 40% of the DRT 2023 budget funded by the regional taxpayer and the remaining through fare revenue which is tied to ridership. In 2023 while DRT experienced its best year of ridership, fare revenue will only cover approximately 26% of its operating expenses resulting in a significant shortfall. How are Customers being impacted? The service adjustments implemented this week was an attempt by DRT to better utilize its resources in an effort to keep up with increasing demands on the system. This resulted in a reduced level of access to transit for some residents because resources had to be reallocated to address the greatest demands and pressures on the network. These actions are not new at DRT and are never easy or popular. For many years DRT has been required to annually optimize the network in response to the realities of approved DRT budgets but this year with out adequate external funding by the Province, it cut back to bare bones. While I can appreciate the reasons why DRT made these recent cuts, unfortunately it has had a significant negative impact on those that depend most on Transit. By implementing a criteria of 800 m walking distance between stops may seen reasonable, it fails to take into consideration, the safety, and accessibility needs of DRT customers. It makes assumptions that those who depend on Transit are able to walk to the these new stops, and or alter their schedules such as students, over 55Plus and others who work shifts. Some of those impacted have mobility issues requiring them to use a walker or similar devices that does not quality for Specialized Services and the option of On Demand pick up would still require them to get to the nearest bus stop 800m away. Other changes removed routes which extended travelling time with-in Pickering. What was previously a 15 minute ride, has in some cases resulted in up to 45 minutes. Seniors who relied on Transit to get to medical appointments, shopping and social outings are no longer able to get there. What’s Needed As a Region and a City, we need to be transit friendly, creating a Transit system that does not leave anyone behind, while encouraging and attracting potential/future riders by offering an option to driving on our already congested road network. From an environmental lens, we want to reduce the Carbon foot print by increasing Transit Ridership, reducing dependency on vehicles. These changes have created a hardship on those who rely on this Public Service and needs to be reconsidered. With your continued support, I will do all that I can to make sure no one is left behind needing a transit bus..

Canada’s immigration and housing

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East In reviewing the past year, two major issues polarizing Canadian society and politics seem obvious. These were issues related to immigration and housing. The crisis in housing, which has made the headlines several times, is a serious issue, which has been treated very superficially from the political standpoint. Nobody seems to realize the serious social implication this will have in the immediate future. Showing a lack of vision for the future of Canada, the political establishment has not seen fit to establish new settlements such those in Australia and Brazil. These would be important and necessary in order to develop and make the most of the resources of the second largest country in the world. In their lack of vision, our leaders are failing the citizens of Canada. There is a historical precedent. In the early twentieth century inspired and dedicated Canadian politicians, who are mostly despised today, invited immigrants to develop the country’s agriculture and economy by establishing the new provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan. It is then obvious that the implications of not looking to the future of Canada are serious. A lot of additional housing is needed while housing prices are skyrocketing. Combined with an ambitious immigration policy not anchored in reality, we as a country are heading for disaster. In a recent article, journalist Lorrie Goldstein accurately points out the lack of knowledge and professionalism shown by the Liberal Government in dealing with this serious issue. Could it be that the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing? For example, Federal Housing Minister Sean Fraser, formerly the Citizenship and Immigration Minister, announced in an interview with The Canadian Press that the Trudeau government will unveil a “renewed” housing plan in 2024. This clearly raises the question of what happened to all of the Liberal Government’s previously announced housing plans. The Liberals have been coming up with new housing plans ever since the 2015 election that brought them to power. In 2017, they announced their National Housing Strategy – originally a 10-year, $40-billion plan. It has since blossomed into a more than $82 billion plan, slated to run until March 2028, “to give more Canadians a place to call home.” The obvious problem is that their immigration policies are undermining their own announced housing policies. Presumably that is one of the things their latest “renewed” housing plan is intended to address. Yet another example of the Liberals announcing new plans to fix problems caused by their previous plans. When Minister Fraser was immigration Minister, he proudly announced the Liberals’ “ambitious” plan to boost Canada’s annual immigration targets to 465,000 permanent residents in 2023, 485,000 in 2024 and 500,000 in 2025. Did it not occur to anyone that these targets would put enormous pressure on Canada’s housing market and undermine housing affordability? The Liberals have since announced that their target for 2026 will be a further 500,000 permanent residents, compared to 272,000 when the Liberals came to power in 2015. Canada will also accept a record 900,000 international students this year compared to 352,000 in 2015, according to current Immigration Minister Marc Miller. Add to that the fact that Canada admitted 220,000 temporary foreign workers last year, an increase of 68% compared to 2021, according to a Globe and Mail analysis of federal data, and start wondering. The cumulative result of these policies, as Statistics Canada reported earlier this month, is that, “Canada’s population was estimated at 40,528,396 on Oct. 1, 2023, an increase of 430,635 people (+1.1%) from July 1, the highest population growth rate in any quarter since the second quarter of 1957 (+1.2%), when Canada’s population grew by 198,000 people. “Canada’s total population growth for the first nine months of 2023 (+1,030,378 people) had already exceeded the total growth for any other full-year period since Confederation in 1867, including 2022, when there was a record growth.” Now, everyone in the Liberal government, from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on down, is saying that ‘something has to be done’ about today’s affordable housing crisis. A crisis exacerbated, if not largely created by its own ill conceived immigration policies. As you may expect, the Liberals are not dealing with the issue. They are focusing on abuses in the international student and temporary worker programs instead. Who could imagine that their dramatic increases to Canada’s immigration levels have anything to do with the housing crisis? On that issue, the Liberals insist, Canada needs more immigrants to build more housing, because, as Miller put it in August, “Without those skilled workers coming from outside Canada, we absolutely cannot build the homes and meet the demand that exists currently today.” This is a clear example of tautology. Are these the communication skills taught in Canadian law schools? The fallacy in the logic of Miller’s argument is pointed out by several knowledgeable people: As the TD Bank warned: “Continuing with a high-growth immigration strategy could widen the housing shortfall by about a half-million units within just two years. Recent government policies to accelerate construction are unlikely to offer a stop-gap due to the short time period and the natural lags in adjusting supply.” The National Bank of Canada cautioned: “The federal government’s decision to open the immigration floodgates during the most aggressive monetary tightening cycle in a generation has created a record imbalance between housing and demand. As housing affordability pressures continue to mount across the country, we believe Ottawa should consider revising its immigration targets to allow supply to catch up with demand.” BMO (Bank of Montreal) reported, “Heightened immigration flows designed to ease labour supply pressure immediately add to the housing demand they are trying to meet. The infrastructure in place and the industry’s ability to build clearly can’t support unchecked levels of demand, so the affordability conundrum continues.” These warnings clearly point to a serious disconnect with reality. Moreover, high interest rates are not helping to resolve the problem. They have a serious impact on provincial and municipal housing policies. As the Trudeau government continues to announce new deals with municipalities to build more housing, we need to remember that their current high immigration polices are undermining those efforts. In my opinion they are panicking now and do not seem to have the skill or expertise to come up with workable solutions. What is your take?