THE GLOBE, THE STAR, THE SUN AND THE CENTRAL NEWSPAPER

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor Rachel Mendleson's article in the Toronto Star, "Threats. Claims of insurrection. A council under siege," dated July 11, 2024, is a glaring example of biased journalism and sensationalism. This piece is nothing more than an opinionated narrative designed to provoke fear and manipulate public perception, rather than presenting a balanced and factual account of the events in Pickering. The Toronto Star has a well-documented history of twisting facts and taking statements out of context to enhance their sales through clickbait, and this article is no exception. Firstly, the article's portrayal of my supporters is one-sided and inflammatory. It labeled them as "alt-right activists" and implies that their actions are purely disruptive and without merit. However, what Mendleson fails to acknowledge is the legitimate concerns and grievances that these citizens have with the current council's policies. Dismissing them as "conspiracy theorists" and "freedom fighters" undermines their right to participate in the democratic process and express their views. The article also sensationalized the incidents at council meetings, portraying them as unprecedented chaos caused solely by me and my supporters. In reality, council meetings are public forums designed for robust debate and citizen engagement. The interruptions and heated exchanges described are not unique to Pickering; they occur in municipalities across the country where contentious issues are debated. The narrative that this is a new and dangerous phenomenon is misleading and exaggerated. Furthermore, the piece accuses me of inciting unrest and aligning with extreme groups without providing concrete evidence. It cites my position and opinions to Pride events and Black History Month as proof of alleged racism and homophobia, yet fails to present my perspective or the context of my statements. I repeatedly denied these accusations and emphasized my commitment to unity and equality for all. The article’s refusal to fairly represent my side of the story reveals a clear bias. Furthermore, her claims and indirect attempt to label me with popular derogatory names, only shows that she has not read the columns in question printed in this newspaper. As if she had read them and with her journalistic training would clearly realize her mistake. Then again, In my opinion this is nothing short of another attack by the Mayor, as he favor The Star over the only in press newspaper serving all of Pickering and Durham region. This kind of bias brings to question the city of Pickering tendering process as if the Mayor under the strong Mayors power clearly is flexing muscle with the Star, so that the Star can solidify any future advertising contracts from the City. The you scratch my back I scratch yours has to go. The Toronto Star's approach to this story also exemplifies their tendency to use clickbait tactics. As their hard copy sales are minimal at best. The Star is not a community newspaper but rather a National newspaper. Their market penetration is minimal and are highly dependent on online... Even though that online no one reads the STAR as per the circulating stats. The headline and subheadings are crafted to evoke a sense of crisis and urgency, drawing readers in with the promise of scandal and controversy. This tactic is designed to drive traffic and engagement, not to inform the public with balanced journalism. The Star is so desperate in gaining market share that they will allow to be influenced by the Mayor’s office and produce this kind of garbage. This is why, I support local businesses like the Central. A newspaper that unites the community by being accessible, affordable and true to what the taxpayers of Pickering are thinking. Bringing news from a local trusted news source operated by a reputable, time proven editor with over 30 years of integrity operating an internationally accredited news agency with office in the United States and Canada. Mendleson's article’s reliance on unnamed sources and anecdotal evidence further undermines its credibility. Claims of threats and insurrection are serious accusations that require substantial proof. By relying on vague statements and hearsay, the article fails to meet the standards of responsible journalism. This further bringing to surface much like the bankrupt Metroland. The Star will print anything in an attempt to solidify lucrative advertising contracts. We need to support local small businesses like the Central making a huge difference in our community. Rachel Mendleson's article is a prime example of the Toronto Star's pattern of gaslighting and manipulating the truth to fit their narrative. It prioritizes sensationalism over factual reporting and fails to provide a balanced perspective on the events in Pickering. Readers deserve better than this kind of biased and inflammatory journalism. It’s crucial to critically evaluate such articles and seek out multiple sources to form a well-rounded understanding of the issues at hand. This is why I will never contribute to the STAR as a columnist. I rather support our local City Newspaper. For all the unbias truth. Read my column on here every week. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

New and Expanded Schools Coming to Durham

By Todd McCarthy MPP Durham I am excited to share that our Riding of Durham will directly benefit from the Ontario government’s historic $1.3 billion investment to support the construction and expansion of 60 school-based projects across the province. For the first time in the history of Ontario, our government is more than doubling the funding commitment to build and expand schools, creating 27,093 new student spaces and 1,759 childcare spaces.This investment is the latest stepin our government’s commitment to ensuring children in Ontarioreceive a premier education that sets them up for success as leaders of tomorrow. In addition, for the 2024-2025school year, the province is providing school boards with approximately $1.4B in funding to renew and improve aged buildingsystems and components. Since 2018, the Ontario government has invested more than $3.6B in capital construction projects for education, including 139 new schools, 109 renovations to existing facilities, and over 8,000 new licensed childcare spaces. What does this mean for Durham? On May 17, 2024, I had the pleasure of joiningformer Minister of Education Stephen Lecce to share that, as a part of this historic investment in education,the government has allocated nearly $60 million to build two new schools (Symington Avenue and Steeplechase Street Public Schooland Kedron #1 Catholic)and expand one school in Oshawa (St. Kateri Tekakwitha Catholic School).On top of these investments in Oshawa, $26.2 million is being invested to builda new school in Clarington (Bowmanville) (Northglen Catholic Elementary School)creating more educational spaces for children and families in this growing community. These investments in Durham – totaling nearly $85 million - will create 1,887 student spaces and 49 childcare spaces in Oshawa and Clarington.I am thrilled that children in our community will have the opportunity to learn and develop at these state-of-the-art facilities. As a father myself, I understand how important early childhood education is toensure that our children reach their full potential. I thank Former Minister of Education Stephen Lecce for his dedication to families in our beautiful community, and I look forward to continuing this important work with EducationMinister Todd Smith.Under the leadership of Premier Ford, your government will take every step necessary to ensure Ontario remains the best place to raise children who areempoweredwith a robust education and the necessary skills to achieveprosperous futures. “We are stepping up with a massive investment to build homes, schools, and communities our province needs, and to ensure children have access to state-of-the-art schools close to home that gives them real life and job skills to succeed in the future.” – Former Education Minister Stephen Lecce “This is great news for Clarington residents who have been eagerly anticipating this announcement. We look forward to seeing construction underway and the start of a new, thriving Catholic school community in Bowmanville,” - PVNC Catholic District School Board Chairperson and Clarington Trustee Kevin MacKenzie. “Our sincere thanks to the Province of Ontario and Ministry of Education, the Honourable Stephen Lecce, [former] Minister of Education, the Honourable Todd McCarthy, Minister of Public and Business Service Delivery [and Procurement] and MPP for Durham, and Mr. Lorne Coe, Parliamentary Assistant to the Premier and MPP for Whitby, for this wonderful news for Catholic education. The six-classroom addition to St. Kateri Tekakwitha Catholic School and the new unnamed Catholic elementary school will allow us to address the population growth and continue to serve our students and families in north Oshawa.” - Monique Forster, Chair of the Durham Catholic District School Board.

The Ford Government and Ontario Place

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East As summer goes on, and Canadians enjoy family BBQs, politicians are relaxing and dreaming of better times. They want to forget their problems as they look to mingle with their constituents. However, there are things on the horizon, and in Ontario the development plans for Ontario Place and the closure of the Ontario Science Center are still on the minds of people. If we look at the history of Ontario Place, it has served Ontarians well over a couple of generations since its inception. However, there is clear evidence of a lack of care or maintenance, and an appalling lack of evolving vision for its future, on the part of subsequent Ontario Governments. It opened on May 22, 1971, and operated as a theme park centered around Ontario themes and family attractions until 2012 when the Government of Ontario announced that it would close for redevelopment. It has since reopened as a park without an admission fee but lacking several of the old attractions. Since the closure as a theme park, several of the venue's facilities have remained open, once reopened, and one section has been redeveloped. The Budweiser Stage operates during the summer season. The Cinesphere, the original IMAX theatre, reopened with new projection equipment and shows films regularly. On the East Island, Trillium Park and the William G Davis Trail opened in 2017. A marina, sheltered by three sunken lake freighters operates seasonally at the site. The exhibit "pods", several pavilions suspended above a lagoon, have remained closed after the closure of the Atlantis event facility. While much of the West Island's facilities are permanently closed, some of the natural spaces are now being used for recreation. Occasionally, special events are hosted in the West island village. So Ontario Place was neglected for twelve years and now, strangely, the Ontario Government and its leader, Premier Ford, have developed an obsession with developing it. Why is that? Let us concede that it is a heaven for developers, and the Premier is known to have a soft spot for them. Let us hope that this attraction is not becoming a fatal one. So what is in the shopping basket for the future development of Ontario Place and the closure of the Ontario Science Center, which is also in the cross-hairs for hungry developers. As we continue to witness, Ontario Premier Doug Ford has dug in his heels on his decision to close the science centre and has touted his plans for overhauling Ontario Place, claiming that he wants the waterfront attraction to become the country’s top tourist destination. The Premier emphasized that he is planning to make Ontario Place the country’s best tourist attraction, and claimed that the Ontario Science Centre’s current location was “a sleepy little neighbourhood”. This claim is quite contrary to the fact that the location is now well connected by public transportation; a transit hub for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT and the Ontario Line when they open. Unfortunately, the Eglinton project is still in the testing phase, but there are hopes that it will finally work after four years of delays. Ford said he believes that once the redevelopment of Ontario Place, including a revamped music stage, spa and a new home for the science centre is complete, it will become more popular with tourists than the CN Tower. “Mark my words, it will be the number one tourist attraction in all of Canada,” Ford said. In pitching his new vision for Ontario Place, Ford also took a swipe at a “small percentage” of people who “make a lot of noise” and, according to the premier, don’t want the government to spend money on its legacy project. “‘We don’t want it, we want to stay antiquated, we want an old wreckeddown Ontario Place that no one’s touched in 10 years and no one uses,’” Ford claimed his detractors were saying. His comments seemed to be directed, in particular, at those who have protested the government’s abrupt announcement in June that it planned to permanently close the 55-year-old Ontario Science Centre building, located at Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue. “We’re building a brand-spanking-new, state-of-the-art, more exhibit space and in the right location — not in a sleepy little neighbourhood in the suburbs that no one goes to,” he said. “This is where all the action is; where the soccer is and the stadium and Live Nation, the Exhibition. It’s just common sense, it’s a no-brainer.” The current science centre is the final stop on the Ford government’s signature Ontario Line project, which will run down to Exhibition Station, beside Ontario Place. With all this said, the question remains: how is the Province working with the City of Toronto, which is the partial land owner of the property on which Ontario Place is located, and the sole land owner of the Ontario Science Center property. It is no secret these days that the City of Toronto is financially in a difficult situation. So how the Province will work with the city to help resolve the housing problem which has reached alarming levels in the city, is still a mystery. Isn’t it wonderful, however, that the province is willing to commit enormous amounts of taxpayers’ money to futuristic projects, looking to attract tourists, while turning a blind eye to the problems of people actually living in Toronto? Also considering the crowding in downtown Toronto, and the chaos of the public transportation system, is this project really a priority right now? This is a question for the people of Toronto, and let us hope that sanity will prevail. What do you think? Have a nice summer!

BYE BYE TD ANOTHER BLOW TO DOWNTOWN OSHAWA

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Well folks it is official. Another hole has been puncture in the SS DOWNTOWN OSHAWA in the hope the water will run out, and in some miraculous way save us from sinking further. Who is doing the thinking here? I get told this all the time. ‘Joe, why are you so negative all the time.’ I am not negative. I see a fire. I scream fire. I am not like the municipal elect and not care. This is my city.... our city. I can’t just sit back and not say anything. I can’t go around pretending that we doing economically great when we have fellow citizens using food banks, loosing homes, living on our streets. I am sorry. If that make me negative... then I am guilty as charge. All I know is I have a moral responsibility to serve my country, my community my family by making sure we all have a great quality of life. The City elect. Erect seniors homes in the core. Yet, they allow banks to run away from the core. The Royal Bank, Bank of Montreal and now Toronto Dominion. Where are these seniors living in the core going to bank? I don’t blame the Mayor of Oshawa, because in his defense I doubt he knows where the downtown core is. Carter is another Biden. Dan Biden is so out of touch with the City that we sit on GM lands of sort with all kinds of former GM auto related facilities.... And what does this incompetent do. NOTHING. Instead. Ford bringing truck production to Oakville in 2026, future unclear for EVs at the plant. Like really. Why has Oshawa been passed over? Why? Because we have no leadership and no vision. That EV plant should have landed in Oshawa. Now back to downtown... we have Giberson and Kerr. Two, so out of touch with the downtown core courncillors that keep missing one opportunity after another. An opportunity to keep the bank downtown core is essential to the local downtown businesses. It is essential to seniors and to any new residence. What has changed in the past 8 years downtown? The drug trade runs rampant. Guns may be purchased without much effort. Open drug use is at an all time high. Homeless rule the core. Where is Giberson? Talk about a waste of taxpayers money. The ideal brown nosed that rather attack local downtown businesses then to map out a logical plan to assist those in the core. Help them prosper and alleviate the problem he created by being chair of program that he supported out of the Back Door Mission, promoting free needles to drug addicts. This causing a huge problem for all downtown businesses. I have a message on behalf of all the downtown merchants. Please resign your post. Do the honorable thing as your lack of doing something about the poor condition of the core is making the rest of Oshawa look bad. Please do the right thing and resign. Thank You.

70 KING - SAME OLD PIG NEW LIPSTICK

70 KING - SAME OLD PIG NEW LIPSTICK By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world”

Before I begin.... Please don’t think, I am being negative. I am not. If I think like the City.... “SOMETHING IS BETTER THAN NOTHING”. Well, as romantic as that sounds. It is not progress. That is an ingredient for failure. In life we do not play to be second and satisfy our efforts with mediocre. We wake up every morning as if it was the day after the fact and we awaken in celebration of the win the day before. This type of thinking is as foreign to our elected official as the idea that the City of Oshawa sits on a gold mine of opportunity and no one is doing anything about it. Did you know that the City out of political spite has neglected you from knowing about all kinds of important events, notices, closures. Instead they expect all citizens to go online. The numbers online speak for themselves, minimal at best. No one is going on line. This means you the taxpayers are not getting notified. You the taxpayers are not benefiting from all that is taking place in our city. You the taxpayers are not being informed on the many studies, by-law passing that affect you. Now back to the PIG IN THE ROOM at 70 King St. This week the relaunched 70 King St took place. An event that was supposed to be a huge success and due to no advertising or promotion.... the only in attendance included a few local municipal elect and their handful of brown nosers. 20 people showed up if that. A huge failure. Now let’s analyze this failure. Now don’t get me wrong there is a difference between being negative and a realist. In this case the facts speak for themselves. 20 people on a grand opening is a failure. The building is the former Genosha Hotel a state of the art building when it was built in 1929. Since those days, it has gone through some transformations. At one time it served as a strip bar, a bikers hang out. A drug heaven. A general party place. The city ran out the strip bar, the bikers and it sat empty and an eye sore for years. The City looked for one out of town sucker after another with no success. The property was put up for sale and it became a hot potato. Developer Rick Summers - apparently bit the hook and decided to bring back the Genosh. The problem is not the Genosh and it’s phantom curse. The problem is it’s location. Lack of walking traffic. I feel for the vendors they talked into going in that property. It is a matter of time before they start feeling the realities of downtown Oshawa. Downtown is not promoted. Walk in traffic is minimal at best. The atmosphere on the streets is horrible due to the homeless and open drug trade. I feel for Rick Summers that he fell for the shinny dog turd gold nugget the city passes as a great idea. The reality is that the core needs some serious promotion. Serious cleaning up. More parking even though Mary St. Parking lot is there.. but who wants to be harassed by those homeless living in the halls of the garage. It is time that will once again sink a good idea due to poor planning and lack of City vision and support.

CITY OF PICKERING & TOWN OF AJAX IN FINANCIAL TROUBLE ?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ASK YOURSELF, “WHY ELSE WHOULD MAYORS, KEVIN ASHE & SHAUN COLLIER JOIN FORCES TO SELL PICKERING’S & AJAX’S, SHARES IN ELEXICON TO RAISE CAPITAL?” The Elexicon Corporation is owned 100% by five Municipal shareholders, Pickering 27.9%, Ajax 21.8%, Whitby 32%, Belleville 9% and Clarington 9.3%. In most cases when people look to sell their assets it is usually because they need money for one reason or another. When a government body sells an asset it’s usually to balance the budget.. NOTE: According to the Municipal Act, 2001, municipalities are required to plan for balanced cash operating budgets every year, can only issue long-term debt for capital projects and may not commit more than 25% of total own-source revenue to service long-term debt and other long term obligations. Pickering Mayor Kevin Ashe and Ajax Mayor Shaun Collier, want to sell their city’s shares, Why? Pickering received $1.7 million from Elexicon for 2023, and Ajax received $1.3 million for 2023. These Dividends will increase year after year as more and more homes are being built and the ownership value will also increase. Hmmm ….. are Strong Mayors Ashe and Collier getting concerned about balancing their budgets this year as required by the Municipal Act? At the beginning of 2024,Mayor Ashe used his Strong Mayor Powers to prepare & propose the City of Pickering’s 2024 budget without Council’s participation, as did Mayor Collier for Ajax. Both Ajax Mayor Collier and Pickering Mayor Ashe said in a joint statement July 3, 2024 “they are weighing the sale of their holdings at a time they believe could yield top value and have hired a firm to prepare the groundwork for disposing of shares. Together, we have retained Borden Ladner Gervais LLP to undertake a confidential non-binding Request for Proposal (RFP) to explore the potential sale of our municipally owned holdings in Elexicon Corporation” Hmmm ….. We’ve all seen what happens when governments sell off public assets. It’s like putting a Band-Aid on a hole in a dam, it works for a moment then you’re drowning. 1 - look back to 2017, to balance the budget, Premier Kathleen Wynne paid consultants $6.5 m to study the potential of selling Hydro One and then sold Hydro One shares for only $6 million, costing Ontario taxpayers future revenue of $1.8 billion because they would no longer receive revenue since they no longer owned Hydro One, and yes, you guest it, hydro costs went up. 2 - in 1999 Premier Mike Harris sold a 99 year lease for the less then 2 year old hwy 407 to a Spanish company for a profit of $1.6 b over the $1.5 b taxpayers paid d to construct the hwy. Two years later when more drivers were using the 407 it was sold for $6.3 b a fraction of what it would be worth later, and you guest it, tolls increased rising over 300% in the following15 years. Hmmm ….. With Ashe and Collier having Strong Mayor Powers, in spite of what they may tell you, they didn’t hire a firm to explore the potential sale not to sell your shares. Ashe & Collier are spending your money, to see about selling, your shares in Elexicon without your say. Hmmm ….. Who would they sell to? The Municipalities of Clarington, Bellville and Whitby would have first choice. If those municiplalities don’t buy or only buy part, then the private sector can. PICKERING & AJAX CONSTITUENTS DON’T WAIT, contact all your councillors in writing and have them all reply in writing, committing to ban together and immediately over-ride the Strong Mayor powers, if & when, be it now or later, that the Mayors Ashe and Collier sell your shares in Elexicon. Selling Your City & Town’s Assets will only Raise Your Taxes & Increase Your Household Bills

A Job Search Game Changer: Assertive Communication

By Nick Kossovan A Job Search Game Changer: Assertive Communication King of all skills: communication skills. Clear, concise communication is the key to getting and keeping an interviewer's attention. An hour-long interview boils down to having 30 minutes to make your case. • First 15 minutes: Small talk, building rapport, setting the tone for the interview. • 30 minutes: Actual interview. • Last 15 minutes: Asking questions and wrapping things up, which influences how your interviewer will remember you. Making your case in 30 minutes requires assertive communication, a powerful skill for conveying your message clearly and directly. When you start using assertive communication, you'll experience a game-changing shift in your job search and career because it's linked to self-confidence and an alpha-like personality, traits that are valued in business environments. During the interview process, your competitors will likely exhibit signs of passivity or aggression. In this context, assertive communication is a strategic advantage, making you stand out and, most importantly, be taken seriously. You want to aim for the sweet spot between the timid passivity of "I'm not sure, whatever you think is fine" and the overly aggressive "This is how it's going to be." The assertive communicator strikes a balance between self-promotion and humility. They state their case firmly but also listen to the other person's point of view. Thisbalance is crucial during an interview, where you must promote yourself by showcasing your qualifications while appearing poised, professional, and easy to work with. Assertive communication has three elements: 1. Adamantly believing in what you speak of. 2. Knowing why you believe what you believe. 3. Being ready to prove why you believe, think or feel what you do; otherwise, it's just your opinion, and "opinions" rarely convince anyone to take action. A few examples of assertive communication in an interview setting: Scenario 1: Discussing salary expectations Passive approach: "I'm open to whatever you offer for this role." Aggressive approach: "To take this job, I need no less than $80,000." Assertive approach: "Based on my 20 years of experience managing inside sales teams and my track record for exceeding sales targets, I think $85,000, plus a commission and quarterly bonus, which we can work out, would be fair. Would this work for you?" The assertive communicator clearly and confidently states their salary expectations, acknowledges the employer's perspective, and leaves room for negotiation. Rather than just throwing out a number, they provide context and explanation. Scenario 2: Addressing a weakness Passive approach: "I definitely need to improve my public speaking. It's something I struggle with." Aggressive approach: "Public speaking is not my weakness at all. I'm an excellent presenter and communicator." Assertive approach: "I'm actively improving my public speaking skills. In my last role, I volunteered to conduct more team presentations. This past March, I joined Toastmasters and have given three talks since. Although I am proud of my progress, there is still room for improvement." An assertive communicator acknowledges their weaknesses honestly and explains how they're addressing them, demonstrating self-awareness and a growth mindset, qualities employers find attractive. Scenario 3: "Do you have any questions for me?" Passive approach: "No, you've covered everything." Aggressive approach: "When can I expect a job offer?" Assertive approach: "Yes, I do. I'm excited about this opportunity and believe I would excel in this role. How soon can I expect to hear from you regarding next steps? I'm eager to move forward." Scenario 4: Expressing interest in the job. Passive approach: "I'd be happy to work here." Aggressive approach: "I am perfect for this job. I expect you to offer it to me today." Assertive approach: "This opportunity excites me. Based on our discussion, I can see how my qualifications and experience align with being able to meet the expectations you have for this role; therefore, I'm confident I would excel in this role. I'm very interested in joining your team. Is there anything else I can tell you about my background to help you decide to hire me? Otherwise, when can I expect to hear from you regarding next steps?" The assertive communicator expresses interest and enthusiasm for the job while respecting the employer's decision-making process. They state their case compellingly without demanding or pressuring the interviewer. Today's job market is hyper-competitive, making job seekers desperate. Hence, it's becoming common for candidates to ask outright at the end of an interview, "Am I hired?" No matter how much you need or want the job, never ask outright if you got the job. While it's understandable you want to "close the deal," putting pressure on the hiring manager to tell you whether you got the job will create an uncomfortable situation. As I mentioned earlier, how you end your interview will influence how you're remembered. Creating an uncomfortable situation isn't what you want to be remembered for. Finding the right balance is the key to assertive communication. Your goal: Be bold and confident without being arrogant or confrontational. Assertive communication is a superpower. Few do it well. It shows employers that you're self-assured, adaptable, and can advocate for yourself. By embracing aggressive communication, you'll be far ahead of your competition. ___________________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Fostering Connection and Community in the Workforce: The role of office design

By Stephanie Uprichard, IDC, GDC, ARIDO, IIDA Studio Forma Interior Design Principal Designer In today’s dynamic business landscape, characterized by evolving work models and dispersed teams, fostering a sense of connection and community within the workforce is more important than ever. CEO’s and leaders are tasked with creating environments that not only promote productivity but also enhance collaboration, engagement, and a sense of belonging. At the heart of this mission lies the often-overlooked power of intentional office design. Connection and community are fundamental to the employee experience and can have far-reaching effects on various aspects of organizational success. When employees feel connected to one another and to the organization’s mission, a sense of unity and shared purpose emerges. This, in turn, can lead to heightened engagement, increased collaboration, and improved problem-solving capabilities. A strong sense of community within the workforce also contributes to higher employee satisfaction and retention. When individuals feel valued, supported, and part of a team, they are more likely to be invested in the organization’s long-term success. This sense of belonging fosters a commitment that extends beyond mere job satisfaction, leading to higher morale, enhanced productivity, and a more positive company culture. Office design plays a pivotal role in facilitating these connections and building a robust community within the workforce. The physical environment can either hinder or enhance interactions, creativity, and a sense of unity. Here’s how CEO’s and designers can work together to create spaces that foster connection and community: Encourage Collaboration: Design spaces that promote collaboration and interaction. This can include open-plan layouts, communal tables, and flexible furniture arrangements that encourage employees to move around and interact. Breakout areas and informal meeting spaces can provide settings for spontaneous conversations and the exchange of ideas. Incorporate Natural Elements: Biophilic design, which incorporates natural elements like plants, water features, and natural light, has been shown to reduce stress, enhance creativity, and improve overall well-being. Bringing the outdoors inside creates a calming and inspiring environment, fostering a sense of connection to something larger than just the workplace. Foster Comfort and Flexibility: Create a variety of comfortable and flexible work settings to accommodate different tasks and preferences. This might include quiet, private spaces for focused work, as well as collaborative areas. Offering adjustable standing desks, ergonomic chairs, and a range of seating options can cater to diverse needs, ensuring employees feel physically supported. Display Company Culture: Use the office design to reflect and reinforce the company’s unique culture and values. This might involve displaying the organization’s mission statement, core values, and brand identity through artwork, signage, or decorative elements. Such visual reminders can inspire a sense of pride and shared purpose. Incorporate Social Spaces: Design dedicated social spaces that encourage employees to interact and build relationships. This could be a café-style lounge, a games area, or a comfortable seating area. These spaces provide opportunities for employees to connect on a personal level, fostering a sense of community and camaraderie. CEO’s have a unique opportunity to shape the workplace environment and, in turn, the employee experience. Leading with intentionality means recognizing the impact of office design on connection and community and taking an active role in its development: Involvement and Feedback: CEO’s should be involved in the design process, offering insights into the organization’s culture and values, and seeking feedback from employees. This ensures that the resulting space aligns with the company’s unique character and the needs of its workforce. Modeling Behavior: CEO’s can lead by example by utilizing the collaborative and social spaces within the office. By embracing the design and actively engaging with employees in these areas, they signal the importance of connection and community. Regular Review and Adaptation: The workplace should be viewed as a living, evolving entity. CEO’s should encourage regular reviews of the space, seeking feedback from employees to identify areas for improvement. This adaptability ensures the office remains a dynamic and effective environment for connection and collaboration. Office design is a powerful tool for CEO’s to create a workplace that fosters connection and community, enhancing employee satisfaction, collaboration, and engagement. By embracing intentional design and leading with empathy, CEO’s can shape a positive, productive, and unified company culture, driving organizational success and a sense of shared purpose.

Can we have a respectful conversation please?

By Patricia Conlin Do you sometimes find yourself thinking differently than your spouse, sibling, neighbour or relative? Do you notice that views in general are becoming more and more entrenched as either right or wrong withlittle room for discussion? Do you feel increasingly nervous about saying something that goes against an obviously severely flawed narrative because you fear for the backlash from the toxic Cancel Culture? Maybe like me, you really desperately just want to say - CAN WE HAVE A RESPECTFUL CONVERSATION PLEASE? Well for the “crime” of thinking differently than Big Brother Government, you might be labeled as a “hater” according to the new Bill C-63 that was introduced in February, 2024 called the “Online Harms Act”. The Online Harms Act’s purpose is to create a baseline standard for online platforms to keep Canadians “safe” and to hold online platforms accountable for the content they host. If this Bill passes, if will give the government limitless authority to decide what online platforms and even citizens can say online under the guise of “keeping everyone safe” from harmful speech. It would give government funded groups the power to decide what is hateful and what is ok. Does that sound good to you? As a recent example, some Canadian Professors displayed appalling and obvious hateful speech when issuing Tweets on X suggesting it was too bad the bullet missed former President Trump in the weekend assassination attempt. In their minds, these comments were just fine. However, if a critically thinking person politely questions Covid policies, government policies, DEI or the harm of mass unsustainable immigration…they might be considered “hateful” under Bill C-63. Can you see the problem here? Not only is Bill C-63 not fair but it gives unlimited power to create more division and endorses actual hate! If a society has lost the ability to disagree respectfully with each other and is being actively punished for questioning an obviously corrupt and irresponsible government, then there is a bigger issue at stake. The foundation of a free and democratic society is free speech. Although we all want to protect our children from predators on-line, why is Bill C-63 penalizing regular people and alternative media and podcasters for speaking out against increasingly totalitarian policies? Benajamin Franklin, one of the fathers of the US confederation, wisely said” “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom-and no such thing as public liberty without freedom of speech.” In his speech there were two important take aways. First, he highlights the importance of learning to think for oneself which he calls “freedom of thought”. This means being allowed to have a different point of view then the government or government funded organizations or even your neighbour or friend or relative. An example of this playing out today can be seen in the documentary called Climate: The Movie (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A24fWmNA6lM) where high level scientists give evidence that opposes the narrative on Climate being pushed as the “Science is Settled” by governments and private companies that benefit from the Green agenda presented in Agenda 2030. These brave independent thinking scientists are just doing their job in questioning the science but currently being censored and defunded for speaking hard facts and providing a different point of view. Imagine what could happen to them if they were considered “hateful” by paid government shills saying they need to be charged according to Bill-C 63? This is why it is important to protect freedom of thought and expression. Second, Franklin speaks about “freedom of speech” which means that society needs to welcome open and diverse thoughts and debate. But is this happening now? During Covid, it was encouraged to report on a neighbour who was not complying with harsh and unconstitutional mandates and lockdowns. With the climate insanity, it is becoming apparent the official narrative is greatly flawed to say the least but harmful policies are still being pushed by every single town under the guise of a climate emergency. Most people recognize the fraud behind the carbon tax but few speak out because they are afraid. I recently presented a delegation to the City of Pickering and was interviewed by Rebel News about the harm of local policies (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3Lf8M_OOzI). I will continue to speak out and encourage you to do the same. Canada is a great country. Together, united we can ensure we allow freedom of thought, freedom of speech and respect for all. Let’s stand up together and say a loud and peaceful NO to Bill C-63. Courage is contagious and many are starting to speak out!

Political violence and the world around us.

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East We are living in an increasingly dangerous world. With wars ignited in Europe, the Middle East and Africa and others in the making, I wonder what the future holds for the next generation. Earlier this year we have witnessed the assassination attempt on the life of the Prime Minister of Slovakia, Robert Fico, as well as increased violence against elected politicians all over Europe. The recent attempt to assassinate former U.S. president Donald Trump as he campaigns for re-election, fuels anxiety and a surge of varied opinions about the climate of political violence being on a dramatic increase in the U.S., with Canadian politicians also coping with an elevated risk level. I remember vividly the attack on Parliament Hill on Thursday, Oct. 22, 2014, because I was there. On the morning of that fatidic day, I was participating in a conservative caucus meeting, and I have seen with my own eyes, the fear and desperation of my parliamentary colleagues. Having this kind on environment in our society is very sad, indeed, but Canada is still better at avoiding political violence that our neighbours to the south. Four serving American presidents have been assassinated: Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley and John F. Kennedy. Theodore Roosevelt was shot during a speech in 1912 but survived; at the time, he was a former president campaigning to regain the job. No Canadian prime minister has ever been assassinated and episodes of political violence have been relatively rare in Canada. However, the climate of security for politicians in this country has deteriorated markedly over the past few years. The RCMP has discussed what it calls a rising number of threats directed at elected officials. Some parliamentarians were given panic buttons in 2022 in response to threats. Several female politicians have resigned in recent months, citing an extreme level of harassment and intimidation. However, Canada has not escaped political violence entirely. Here are some of the most significant acts of violence directed against politicians in Canada’s history: Thomas D'Arcy McGee, a father of Canadian Confederation, was killed in Ottawa in 1868. Police arrested Patrick James Whelan, a tailor who was sympathetic to the Fenians, a group of Irish radicals who hoped to weaken the United Kingdom through attacks on its North American colonies. Whelan insisted he was innocent but after a complicated and controversial trial, he was found guilty and sentenced to death. George Brown, a journalist and politician, is considered a father of Confederation for his instrumental role in pushing for national unity in the 1850s and 1860s. He founded The Globe, an influential Toronto newspaper that later merged with The Mail and Empire to form The Globe and Mail. Brown was in his office at the newspaper on March 25, 1880, when a disgruntled former employee accosted him and shot him in the leg during a struggle. The wound became infected and lead to Brown's death on May 9. Brown was a sitting senator at the time of his death. In May 1966, Paul Joseph Chartier entered the House of Commons carrying a bomb made of 10 sticks of dynamite. He went to a bathroom to light the fuse and then exited, presumably to carry the bomb back to the gallery of the House. But the bomb exploded too early, killing the man himself. The kidnapping and killing of Pierre Laporte, which precipitated what became known as the October Crisis in 1970, eventually led to the first peacetime use of the War Measures Act, implemented by then Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. Laporte, who was deputy premier of Quebec at the time, was kidnapped by the Quebec separatist group Front de libération du Québec. Laporte was eventually killed by his captors. British diplomat James Cross, also kidnapped a few days before Laporte, was released safely after negotiations. An army corporal entered the Quebec National Assembly on May 8, 1984 and opened fire, killing three people and wounding many more. Despite his claim that he wanted the Parti Quebecois government "destroyed," the gunman, Denis Lortie, was convinced over the course of five hours by the assembly's sergeant-at-arms, René Jalbert, to give himself up to police. On the night of the election win in September 2012 that made her premier of Quebec, Pauline Marois was targeted by Richard Henry Bain. He was looking to attack her and other supporters of the separatist Parti Québécois. Bain ended up killing one person and injuring another, though Marois herself was unharmed. The 2014 attack on Parliament Hill began steps from the legislature at the National War Memorial, when Michael Zehaf-Bibeau shot and killed Cpl. Nathan Cirillo, who was serving as a ceremonial guard at the monument. The attacker then ran to Parliament Hill, entered Centre Block and wounded one police officer before engaging in a gunfight with others. Both the governing Conservatives and the Opposition NDP were holding caucus meetings at the time. The man was eventually shot and killed by RCMP officers and House of Commons Sergeant-at-Arms Kevin Vickers. On July 2, 2020, a Manitoba man stormed the gates of Rideau Hall and sought an armed confrontation with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Corey Hurren crashed his pickup truck through the gates of the Rideau Hall grounds, where both the Governor General and prime minister live, and set out on foot with three loaded firearms and a knife before getting into a 90- minute standoff with RCMP officers. Hurren told the officers he was there to arrest Trudeau. He was angry about COVID-19 restrictions and recent amendments to gun laws. He pleaded guilty to eight charges and in March 2021, was handed a sixyear sentence, and recently liberated from prison. We should consider that the increase of information available on social media, and the vitriolic rhetoric in the House of Commons, might contribute significantly to further the temptation for violence against politicians. Let us hope that the responsible agencies in Canada will be able to protect Canadian politicians from such violence. It will be up to them to continue to develop their skills in order to be better prepared than their colleagues south of the border. What do you think?

The R.S.E.S. (Robin Hood Social Economic Syndrome) Understanding R.S.E.S.

By Dale Jodoin R.S.E.S., or Robin Hood Social Economic Syndrome, is a term used to describe the belief that it is acceptable to steal from those who have more money and resources to give to those who have less. This idea is rooted in socialism and communism, where the goal is to create a more equal society by redistributing wealth. However, this concept has been misunderstood and misused by some people today. In neighborhoods across Canada, the United States, and Great Britain, crime and homelessness are increasing. Some people argue that it’s acceptable for those in poverty to steal because they supposedly need to do so to survive. This includes stealing food or other essentials. However, the reality is more complicated and troubling. Contrary to the belief that thieves only steal necessities, many people steal high-value items. For example, grocery stores report that meat is a common target for theft, often taken to be resold for cash or drugs. This shows that not all theft is about survival; many thefts are driven by other motives. People receiving social assistance or living in poverty might feel justified in stealing because they earn less than others. However, it’s important to note that most people living in poverty do not resort to theft. Many work hard every day to support their families and never steal. One reason theft is becoming more common is that many thieves face little to no consequences. Some political parties and beliefs, such as those held by some liberals and socialists, argue that people steal because of their economic status. They believe addressing the root causes of poverty is more important than punishing theft. While the idea of helping the poor is noble, justifying theft under the guise of R.S.E.S. is problematic. It’s not just about stealing food to survive. People often steal high-value goods that they do not need, showing that theft is not always about survival but rather about taking advantage of situations. According to various reports, a significant portion of thefts are committed by individuals seeking to sell stolen goods for money or drugs, not just to meet basic needs. This undermines the argument that theft is solely for survival and highlights the complexities of the issue. R.S.E.S. is a dangerous and misguided belief. It oversimplifies the reasons behind theft and crime and fails to address the real issues. Stealing is not a solution to poverty; it’s a symptom of deeper societal problems that need to be addressed through proper support and interventions, not through excusing criminal behavior. We must recognize the hard work of those living in poverty who do not resort to theft and work towards solutions that provide real support without condoning crime.

How the Mayor and Council have laid siege to Pickering through their wasteful spending and vindictiveness

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor In an astonishing display of vindictiveness and fiscal irresponsibility, the Pickering Mayor and Council chose to spend an exorbitant $200,000 of taxpayers’ money on court costs rather than addressing a simple $15,000 salary dispute. This is not just a tale of bureaucratic inefficiency; it is a glaring example of how far personal vendettas can drive public officials to misuse public funds. At the heart of this issue lies a biased integrity commissioner’s report that unfairly docked me $15,000 for doing what I was elected to do: represent the people of Pickering. Instead of acknowledging the error and rectifying the situation. Although I initiated the challenge, the Mayor and Council could have prevented this entire situation from escalating, if they had chosen to address the issue reasonably from the outset. Instead, during a special meeting of the council, closed to both myself and the public, it was decided to endure a punitive legal battle that drains our community’s resources and undermines the very principles of justice and accountability. I have witnessed this type of behaviour numerous times. Perhaps different circumstances, but the outcome remains the same: People in power who prefer indulging in personal retribution over serving the best interest of their constituents. Why wouldn’t they? It’s not their money. Time and time again, they continue to demonstrate that they couldn’t care less about wasting taxpayer funds. This kind of behavior is not just an insult to me personally, but a slap in the face to every taxpayer in Pickering. It highlights a disturbing trend where personal grudges take precedence over sound governance and fiscal responsibility. Consider the implications of this decision. The $200,000 being squandered on legal fees could have been used to improve local services, support community projects, or even reduce taxes. Instead, it is being funneled into a protracted legal battle that benefits only the lawyers involved. This is a textbook case of penny-wise and pound-foolish decision-making, where a simple and inexpensive solution is ignored in favor of an extravagant and unnecessary expenditure. This incident also raises broader questions about transparency and accountability in our local government. When public officials can misuse taxpayer money without repercussions, it erodes public trust and confidence in the system. It sends a message that personal agendas can override the collective good and that the financial burden of these vendettas will fall squarely on the shoulders of the community. Pickering residents need to start holding our elected officials accountable for their actions and ensure that our hard-earned tax dollars are used wisely and ethically. It is not enough to be outraged; we must channel that outrage into action, calling for greater oversight, transparency, and a commitment to serving the public good. The Mayor and Council’s decision to prioritize a vindictive legal battle over a fair and just resolution is a stark reminder of the need for vigilance and advocacy in our local governance. It is a call to action for all of us to stand up against the misuse of power and to fight for a government that truly represents the interests of its people. Stand up and demand accountability and start insisting that your government serves you the people, not personal vendettas, or those with deep pockets. Let this be a wake-up call for all, to start engaging more actively in local politics to ensure your voices are not only heard, but respected. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

PATTERN RECOGNITION

from Wayne & Tamara I've been dating my boyfriend for two years. When our relationship began, I was completely dedicated to him, and he was a complete jerk who fooled around on me more than three times. We both realized it was because we never communicated. Since then we've become best friends and built a strong relationship. However he ogles other women while I'm with him, and it hurts. During one of the times we were broken up, he allowed me to read his journal which explained what he thinks about when he checks out other women's body parts. He actually wrote he would love to fool around with them and see how they feel. I am an extremely attractive girl. I feel insulted when I'm dressed up and he checks out less attractive girls who are just wearing jeans with their hair thrown in a ponytail. When I say something about it, he makes it seem like I made it all up. He yells at me as if I have done something wrong. He talks about marrying me after we graduate from college next year, but I'm not sure. Am I overreacting and paranoid, or is he lying when he says he is sure about us? Nicole Nicole, how do you make a smart woman feel stupid? By calling her stupid and paying attention to women who aren't as smart as she is. How do you make a woman tolerate physical abuse? By diminishing her self-esteem and making her feel she deserves the treatment she receives. How do you make an attractive woman doubt herself? Read your own letter. Imagine we introduced you to a man in boots wearing a Stetson hat, with a kerchief around his neck and chaps over his jeans. You look closely at the man and see his hands are callused and his face weather-beaten. Then we ask, "Do you think this man is a hairdresser or a rancher?" You would tell us he is a rancher, and you would be right. How did you know? Because you have a pattern built up in your mind of what a rancher looks like and what a hairdresser looks like. Patterns like this are called heuristics, and accurate heuristics help us navigate through life. Now think about the couples you know who are closest to each other, who never undermine each other, who genuinely love each other. Some of these couples may be your age, some may be your parents' age, and some may be your grandparents' age. These couples form a heuristic for you. They illustrate the pattern of love. That is not the pattern of your relationship. There is no reason for you to settle for your boyfriend. You know what you want, you know what you need, and you know this man cannot give it to you. Why not? Because he does not fit the heuristic you have in your mind of what love looks and feels like. He fits the heuristic of a man who is still looking. Wayne & Tamara An Innocent Man I always thought life is about karma. I wonder if there is a direct correlation between my past and thinking my husband, who is not the man I cheated on, is cheating. I am sorry for what I did, and in my heart I love my husband and know he is faithful. Hannah Hannah, you haven't gotten your comeuppance yet, so subconsciously you think your husband is cheating. That might end your marriage, and you would get the punishment you deserve. Karma doesn't mean the bad thing you did must happen to you. Once you've realized what you did was wrong and grown from it, the cycle is at an end. If your kind of karma ruled the universe, it would have you divorce a blameless man to marry an unfaithful one. That sort of unconscious reasoning would only punish the innocent man. Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

A Call to Care for Parents

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford On the growing list of health pandemics – COVID-19, obesity, diabetes, liver disease, dementia, heart disease, and stroke – there is another one. It’s called benign neglect, and it is a product of our times. It happens when children don’t make sufficient effort to help aging parents understand and manage their medications. There’s a lot of guilt to go around. But that’s not to say this is easy work. Ask your parents what medications they are taking and why. Better yet, have a close look at the medications in their possession and assess how well they are adhering to prescribed treatments. Congratulations to those who find all is well. For others, it may be a wake-up call. Over the past several decades, detrimental trends have punished an aging society. Number one, the pharmaceutical industry has ballooned into a juggernaut of profiteering dealmakers with other powerful industries, not least of which are media platforms that depend on advertising dollars. Unsuspecting consumers are too willing to absorb everything they hear about pills to address problems that are often caused by lifestyle, not bad luck. Easier to pop a pill and enjoy life, like on the commercials, than work on the root issues. Number two, we are living longer – and not always in the best of health. Furthermore, there is a large cohort of the population in North America, the baby boomers, now moving into their senior years. Just watch the costs escalate! Number three, we have a shortage of healthcare workers. Number four, we take pride in being able to age, independently, without a lot of oversight. These and other factors mean that a huge number of older people are growing old, living alone, dealing with multiple health problems, and taking all sorts of pills. The great shame is this last point, that many people are making their lives worse, or at risk of doing so, because they are taking too much medication, or the wrong medication, or not adhering to drug protocols. Take statins as an example. These are complex medications designed to treat high cholesterol. As one website simplifies the explanation, “they work by reducing the amount of cholesterol made by the liver and helping the liver remove cholesterol that is already in the blood.” But statins have potentially serious side and long-term effects that researchers are starting to expose. Studies show statins increase the risk of developing diabetes. This risk differs between commonly prescribed drugs. Cognitive problems, muscle cramps, and other negative effects result from longterm use. Even if the medical establishment were to do a better job of weighing the pros and cons of statins versus natural approaches such as high-dose vitamin C, a great many elderly citizens would not benefit. The pandemic of benign neglect is getting in the way. The so-called silent generation, born between 1928 and 1945, now mostly in their 80s and 90s, need our care. It’s upon younger people to ensure that the quality of the remainder of their lives is not being jeopardized by chronic misuse of powerful drugs. The boomers are moving into their senior years. Their large numbers can be a force for change in the way we care for the elderly. What can we do here and now? One of the best things would be to ensure elderly parents are not falling victim to “pillitis”. Find out what they are taking and do your research. Just as there is a lot of misinformation online, there are also trusted sources. If you have questions, take those questions, and your parents, to a doctor’s appointment for a fully informed discussion. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

When Approached With the Right Mindset, Networking Pays Off

I'll break it down:

By Nick Kossovan I'll break it down:When Approached With the Right Mindset, Networking Pays Off Right now, there are job opportunities all around you, with a catch: they're attached to people. Hence, what you already know, networking is the most effective strategy for finding a job. If you still need convincing that networking is essential to landing a job, I recommend reading Why Networking is More Important than Ever Before by Leslie StevensHuffman, in which he states, "Data shows that 87 percent to 92 percent of jobs are filled through introductions or referrals from your network." The more you network, the further ahead you'll be of the 99% of job seekers you're competing against. Serious job seekers understand that the goal isn't to apply to more jobs but to talk to more people. Job seekers complaining that the hiring system—as if a universal hiring methodology exists—is broken are those who still believe they can apply online, along with hundreds if not thousands of other candidates, many just as qualified, if not more, and then wait to hear from a stranger, the hiring manager. This strategy, used by most job seekers, only offers a fractional chance of landing an interview, explaining why most job seekers arefrustrated. I often hear from jobseekers that networking feels manipulative. The entire business world, especially its drivers of consumption—without consumption, there's no business—marketing and sales depend on manipulation. "Worrying" about appearing manipulative makes me wonder if the person has a solid foundation of ethical behaviour or just picks and chooses ethical principles to justify "why they don't." Strangers owe you nothing and are likely focused on keeping their head above water. For your networking activities to be effective, you must approach people with curiosity, empathy, and, above all, a desire to add value. Don't feel entitled to someone's time. Before approaching someone you want to build a professional relationship with, ask yourself: "How can I help this person? What does the person have to gain by connecting with me?" • Your market intelligence? • Your vendor/supplier relationships? • Your industry expertise? • Your skills? • Your measurable track record of achieving results? Asking yourself, "What does [stranger] have to gain by knowing me?" before approaching [stranger] is a subtle but powerful shift in perspective. Focus first on understanding the other person's needs and challenges, which may require some research, as opposed to solely pursuing your own agenda. What issues are they grappling with in their work or business? How might your unique skills, knowledge, or connections assist them? Everybody has their own agenda. If you can't clearly show the person you're reaching out to how you can assist them with their agenda, why should they help you? Would you help a stranger with their job search if they didn't, in some way, help with your agenda? When you reach out to strangers with an "I want something from you" attitude, as most people do, expect resistance and being ghosted. Nobody wants to help someone who's only interested in their own agenda. On the other hand, when you take a consultative approach, probing into challenges, chatting through problems, offering ideas and solutions, and finding commonalities, you're much more likely (no guarantee) to build meaningful connections. From what I'm experiencing, blame it on social media, hiding behind our smartphone, and the recent common limiting belief of being an introvert; we've lost the ability to cultivate relatio ships, which requires focusing on the other person's wants and needs while putting ours on the back burner. Don't be one of the 'What the f*ck do you want?' people. When you reach out, lead by offering something of value. Whether professional or personal, there are three what I call human principles to beginning and maintaining a relationship: 1. People are attracted to those who try to start a conversation with them. (Conversation starters attract people.) 2. A desire to help makes you memorable and interesting. 3. Showing interest in someone is a massive gesture. An analogy that illustrates the above is offering to help an elderly person carry their groceries to their car. While walking to their car and placing their groceries in the trunk, you make small talk and find out their son is the VP of finance at a multi-national biomedical company. You're a certified accountant searching for your next job. As you place the last bag of groceries in the truck, you ask if they would mind introducing you to their son. I know. You wish networking were as easy as this. Undeniably, networking can be challenging, but scenarios like this analogy happen every day. I've experienced this more than once. Offering value before asking for value is far more effective than reaching out to cold. Worth mentioning is a pet peeve of mine that's a recipe for being ghosted: People who haven't spoken to me in years seeking my help. Maintaining your current professional relationships can't be overstated. Reaching out only when you need something is borderline insulting. The most successful networkers approach networking not as a necessary evil but as an opportunity to forge genuine, mutually beneficial connections. Habitually approaching people with curiosity, empathy, and a generous heart will make networking an enjoyable and rewarding experience. • If your interviewer likes you, they're going to hire you. • If they don't like you, they won't hire you.along with everything you say and do while on the company's property, goes into the hiring decision mix, not just what you say when speaking with your interviewer. An interview isn't an assessment of your skills and experience, at least not to the extent you think. Your interviewer is aware of your skills and experience from your resume and LinkedIn profile. When an employer is interviewing you, it's because you have the qualifications they're looking for and need. Yes, your interviewer will assess your skills and experience, but not as much as your character, values, mannerisms, and whether you'll fit in well with the team/company or possibly be a disruption. In several columns, I've stated that being likable supersedes your skills and experience. I've yet to meet a hiring manager who hired someone they didn't like. Social etiquette, which, worth repeating, shows consideration for others, goes a long way toward being likable. Your skills and experience aren't your greatest asset. They're secondary to your greatest asset, being likable. Therefore, as a job seeker, do yourself a huge favour by not focusing so much on selling your skills and experience, which, as I said, your interviewer is aware of. Instead, focus on your social etiquette, presenting yourself as a friendly, easygoing, likeable person who's considerate of others and, therefore, will be easy to work with. ___________________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

SOCIAL MEDIA IS DEAD...

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - I can speak on this matter with great expertise, as I through this newspaper was one of two local companies that brought internet to Durham Region. I remember when we first introduced it to the market. There were no takers. This is way before ‘smart phones’, tablets and in many cases home computers. People use to laugh at the fact that one day we would all have computers in our homes. That we would all have phones that did not require wires. They laughed... Look at us now. The transformation has been significant to shift society, industry and government. Government from the onset of the internet kept looking for ways to tax it, control it and monopolize on it. Unfortunately for the government. They did not have the expertise, the technical know how of how or what to do. For The Central. It was a great time. A time of phenomenal growth even though we could not sell one internet hook up. What we did was smarter. We worked with Microsoft on their Beta software. Microsoft already had it in their scopes at the potential for the internet to become a huge market for their telecommunication side. As such we worked with them to develop some of the technologies today everyone uses. The Central was the first newspaper across the planet to be publishing online. THE VERY FIRST. The Central, through Durham City Central Radio ‘THE WAVE’. was the first commercial radio station to be broadcasting on line. YES THE VERY FIRST. Since those days, we have seen online transform. From the first browser. To the first chat. To the many competing platforms that offers convenience and easy use of the net. We also seen the rise in commercialization. This was the beginning to the end. As soon as the corporate pirates found a way to make a buck. It was game over for the average user. I blame in part GOOGLE for this. They lead, the way on e-commerce and the many other platforms that utilize sophisticated algorithms to control, monitor every user interface. Today, with the intro of FB and other social media. The internet has no value. As soon as you ‘x’ off what you are viewing... it is pretty much gone for ever, unless you know what you are doing. Most don’t. Then where is social media heading? Well, it is already there. It is dead. Look at the ‘likes’, reposts and or comments. Look at the quality of the comments. The number... Modern day internet has become nothing short of a public toilet. I see the future to be fully commercialized and taxed. Taxed because under the guise of of convenience and national security. The government will give itself the right to monitor, censor all content. You will have to pay for a service plus a subscription much like you do for tv. Are you ready to pay, pay, pay and get less, less, less?

The need for a modern Canadian Industrial Policy

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East It is generally accepted today, that a modern industrial policy is crucial for nations aiming to foster economic growth, innovation, and competitiveness in the current global economy. Unfortunately, Canada at this point does not have a new C.D.Howe and the prospect of getting one in the near future is rather bleak. Considering the geopolitical situation in the world and associated ever changing and evolving factors, Canada needs to craft a modern, proactive and robust industrial strategy across key sectors vital to Canadian national interest. Canada's current approach, which provides resources and funding on an ad-hoc basis to politically correct projects and/or in reaction to global crises, without a real analysis of opportunities, is profoundly inefficient and costly. While we may not be able to match the financial strength of the United States, China, or the European Union, we can leverage, maintain and increase our competitive advantages in research and development, talent, and intelligent exploitation of our vast natural resources. Positioned geographically and economically for future success, Canada must concentrate on prioritizing and refining its industrial policy to stay competitive globally. Rather than acting on ivory tower impulses hosted by Ottawa, Canada should support industries and people in sectors critical to our economic and national interests. Forward thinking policies anchored in knowledge and understanding that will coordinate domestic and foreign investment within a new pan-Canadian economic strategy is essential for economic growth in all of Canada’s regions. Canada's economic landscape has traditionally been influenced by its key industries such as natural resources and technology. A well-crafted industrial policy must provide targeted support to these sectors. It must include high tech manufacturing, boosting productivity and global competitiveness. A new approach to, and significant investment in, research and development (R&D) is sorely needed. It is crucial for Canada to ramp up its R&D spending to drive innovation, something that has been grossly neglected in the last quarter of a century. Canada used to be a leader in the nuclear industry, but has lost its edge due to a short-sighted, mostly ignorant political class, advised by an incompetent and politically polluted public service. Strategic diversification of Canada's economy, particularly through the development of emerging industries like artificial intelligence, renewable energy, and advanced manufacturing, can pave the way to a more resilient economy. For this to happen there has to be a real political will and a knowledge-based political class. Do you know of any likely candidates waiting in the wings? The political class in power, as well as those seeking power, bombard us with casual and aimless documents that do more harm to Canada’s global standing than not producing any documents at all. Instead, we need visionary industrial policies and national plans that include concrete implementation strategies. It is necessary for Canada to invest in its critical infrastructure, improve education and skills training, and foster a business environment conducive to innovation and entrepreneurship. Our elected officials must cease and desist from committing valuable financial resources to pet political projects, which do not serve the interest of Canadians. Canada really needs to concentrate on a new approach to its economy in order to get its strategic industries under more stable state control; that puts ownership and control in the hands of the people, and is not subject to the avarice and will of the multinationals. There is a need to be more accountable to the people of Canada and stop wasting precious taxpayers’ money on uncontrollable foreign projects where no one is held accountable. In addition, Canada must develop policies to secure its supply chains, particularly for essential goods such as medical supplies, semiconductors, and critical minerals. By building domestic capabilities and diversifying supply sources, Canada can enhance its economic sovereignty and reduce reliance on foreign entities. A well-crafted industrial policy can also drive job creation and promote social well-being. By focusing on national interest driven high-growth sectors and investing more in technical education and training programs, Canada can ensure its workforce is equipped with the skills needed for the jobs of the future. This will reduce unemployment and also address income inequality by providing opportunities for upward mobility. A modern and well thought-out national industrial policy can help address geographic inequities in Canada by encouraging population growth and job creation outside of a handful of major cities and eventually creating new settlements in this great country currently populated far from its valuable natural resources. Certainly, a new, modern national industrial policy needs to work closely with a new and innovative tax policy necessary to generate funds for further economic development. Unfortunately, the current tax policy is oriented only to taking money in order to raise the numbers of an increasingly inefficient public service. It is definitely not being spent in the area of science and innovation, which should be a vital priority. With such enthusiasm for tax hikes, it is not surprising that since the Trudeau government took office in 2015, the number of employees at the Canada Revenue Agency has increased from around 40,000 to almost 60,000 by 2023. Compare this growth of almost 50 per cent in the public service, to the growth rate of private-sector employment, which was about 11 per cent between 2015 and 2023. Moreover, that 11 per cent is the combined growth for private industry employed and self-employed individuals. Furthermore, as taxes are raised, public safety and national defence, which are key federal government functions, are performed dismally. Crime is rising and Canada’s military readiness is “dangerously inefficient.” Canada is a rich country and I think it would be a good idea to spend this money on hiring less bureaucrats and more scientists and engineers. In conclusion, Canada must develop a comprehensive new and modern industrial policy combined with an efficient tax policy. This is essential for Canada to navigate the complexities of the modern global economy and secure a bright future for the next generation. What do you think?

Seniors Remarrying Despite Millennial and Gen Z Disapproval: A Celebration of Love and Life

By Dale Jodoin As we progress into an era where people live longer and healthier lives, the dynamics of senior relationships are evolving. One of the significant changes is the increasing number of seniors remarrying, even though it has drawn criticism from younger generations like Millennials and Gen Z. This criticism often centers around concerns about inheritance, but such views overlook the emotional and social needs of seniors. Seniors are now living longer, and this extended longevity means that many experience the profound loss of a long-term partner. After years of companionship, caregiving, and raising families, the death of a spouse can be an incredibly challenging and lonely experience. For many, finding new love and companionship is a way to reclaim joy and purpose in their later years. Despite the disapproval from their families, particularly younger relatives, seniors are choosing to remarry or live together, prioritizing their happiness over societal expectations. One of the main reasons families, especially the younger members, disapprove of seniors remarrying is the concern over inheritance. They worry about how the family wealth will be divided, fearing that a new spouse might diminish their share. This concern, while understandable, often overshadows the genuine emotional needs of their grandparents. The financial aspect of remarrying can indeed complicate matters, but it is essential to balance these concerns with the recognition of seniors' rights to pursue happiness. Remarkably, many seniors are not just remarrying; they are also choosing to live together without formal marriage. This trend reflects a practical approach to companionship without the legal and financial entanglements of marriage. It’s a beautiful testament to the adaptability and resilience of seniors who refuse to let age dictate their ability to love and live fully. It's disheartening to see that Generation X, Millennials, and Gen Z are often more worried about their potential inheritance than the happiness of their grandparents. They seem to hold the belief that older people should merely exist in the background, silently enduring their final years. They expect seniors to sell their homes and pass on the proceeds, rather than using their assets to enhance their quality of life. This mindset reflects a profound misunderstanding of what it means to live fully at any age. The truth is, seniors today are breaking free from these outdated expectations. They are traveling, engaging in hobbies, and yes, finding new love. It's inspiring to see individuals in their eighties remarrying or choosing to live together. Love, after all, knows no age. The joy and companionship found in these relationships are invaluable, contributing to the mental and emotional well-being of seniors. Moreover, it’s not just about finding a romantic partner. The decision to remarry or cohabit also stems from a desire for companionship and mutual support. Many seniors find themselves living alone, which can lead to feelings of isolation and depression. Having a partner to share life with, whether legally married or not, can significantly improve their quality of life. It is a shame that younger generations, who often neglect their elderly relatives, are so fixated on financial outcomes. Many of them rarely visit their grandparents, only showing up during holidays with an eye on what they might inherit. This neglect highlights a lack of understanding and empathy towards the needs and desires of older family members. If seniors fall in love again, they should be encouraged to enjoy their lives to the fullest. Whether they choose to remarry, live together, or even embrace non-traditional relationships, it's their life to live. Society must respect their autonomy and the choices they make to find happiness. For those concerned about the financial implications, it’s important to have open and honest conversations. Seniors should be transparent about their plans and ensure that their estates are managed in a way that reflects their wishes while addressing the concerns of their families. Legal instruments like prenuptial agreements and updated wills can help mitigate conflicts and provide clarity. Ultimately, the joy and fulfillment seniors find in their new relationships should be celebrated, not condemned. Love is a fundamental human experience, and it does not diminish with age. Seniors have the right to live their lives fully, with love, companionship, and happiness. If younger generations cannot see past their financial interests, it reflects more on their shortcomings than on the actions of their elders. So, to all seniors out there, embrace your right to love and be loved. Whether you choose to remarry, live together, or enjoy life in whatever way makes you happy, do so without fear of judgment. Life is precious, and it is meant to be lived fully, right until the end. And if younger relatives whine about it, remind them that their attitudes can have consequences on their relationship with you. Live boldly, love deeply, and enjoy every moment you have. Dedicated This is dedicated to my sister-in-law Brenda, who was married and lost her husband. She remarried and found new happiness, with her we new husband. She passed away a few years ago, but we knew she was happy. Rest in peace.

Real Connections Matter

By Dale Jodoin Let the Trend Die: City Hall, Talk to the People! Welcome to the new trends of city halls and regions from Canada to the United States. City officials have built virtual walls with the internet, encouraging people to email them instead of engaging face-to-face. This approach might be convenient, but it fails to truly connect with the community. Politicians and city workers ask for opinions online, but 80% of the feedback comes from people outside our city. They claim this is what the people want, but is it really? This reliance on online communication creates lazy politicians. The voices that dominate are often whiners and trolls who do not represent the majority. These non-residents cannot vote, yet their opinions shape decisions. Our city officials avoid in-person interactions, pushing for online voting and decision-making. This shift has led to the lowest voter turnouts in history across Canada and the United States. People feel disconnected from their communities because the only ones who seem to care are online trolls. City leaders claim events are successful, even when attendance is low. When clubs struggle to attract members, they start to fade away. Instead of fostering genuine connections, the city should focus on representing everyone, like Oshawa, with its diverse ethnic groups. We need a new kind of celebration, one that includes all voices, not just a select few. This is not about being woke; it's about ordinary people from different walks of life working together. Yet, politicians and their media supporters pat themselves on the back without questioning the reality. Our city loses out because politicians hide behind their screens. More politicians push for online voting, relying on their inner circle, leading to increased voter apathy and isolation. The only way to change this is for politicians to get off their chairs and engage with the people directly. If they could do it before the internet, they can do it now. Lazy politicians need to reconnect with the community. To change your city, go out and give politicians a piece of your mind. Don’t let internet trolls decide your town’s future. This observation comes from watching the world and the actions of today’s politicians. Let’s make it clear: we need real connections, not virtual walls. Our city recently held a fiesta—a celebration meant to bring together the different ethnic groups in our community. However, the reality is far from what it used to be. By 10:00 a.m., more people were at the lake than at the celebration. Our leaders must step out from behind their screens and engage directly with the community. Only by doing this can we genuinely celebrate our diversity and create a more united, vibrant city.

All In The Family

from Wayne & Tamara I am 22 and the oldest of four children. I have a brother, 17, who is the second oldest. He's been in a "committed relationship" with a girl, also 17, for over two years. However, he is currently speaking on the phone with other girls and going on dates with them. Once a school friend told my brother's girlfriend he was seeing another girl. My brother's girlfriend came to my house, took my brother to the other girl's house, and confronted them both. My brother denied everything and totally painted another picture to his girlfriend. She ate it up. Needless to say, they are still together, and he is still seeing another girl. I am bothered by his lack of respect for women. I've tried to speak with him about treating women the way he would want to be treated, but my words are wasted. I'm confused about what to do. His girlfriend has become a member of our family. She comes over all the time, and I feel guilty not telling her the truth. Should I tell her? Should I tell the other girl? Or should I stay out of it? I don't want to be like my dad's family who cover up infidelities for years. I think I have a responsibility to all women, since I am a woman, to tell the truth. I also feel the need to teach my brother a lesson about women and how he should treat them. What do you think I should do? Sheila Sheila, where did your brother learn this behavior? Where most people learn their behavior--from his family. Normally the advice would be to give your brother an option: either tell your girlfriend, or I will tell her. In this instance that won't work. He is willing to lie when confronted, and she is willing to believe a lie. You want your brother to treat women better, but you are not capable of teaching him that. As long as he experiences pleasure in what he is doing, he will continue doing it. Often a man who cheats never learns the lesson, because the pleasure for him is multiple women, and there will always be women who allow him to do this. If you tell either of his girlfriends, they may resent you, not seek the truth about him. But the one thing telling does is to let your brother, his girlfriends, and your family know you do not approve of his behavior. Silence indicates acceptance, and you do not accept this behavior. Go ahead and tell. But do not expect your brother to change, his girlfriends to thank you, or your parents to stand behind you. When people openly flaunt bad behavior, you damage yourself when you keep silent. Each time you speak up, you express your character. Speaking up strengthens your sense of self and makes you less vulnerable to abuse by others. Wayne & Tamara From The Heart We are celebrating our 30th wedding anniversary in May and renewing our marriage vows in church. There will be a reception afterwards. We would like to indicate in the invitation we would prefer donations to a charity rather than receiving gifts. What wording may we use that would not sound imposing, yet encourage guests to help others in need? Mac and Aileen Mac and Aileen, if you want your guests to donate to a certain charity, give them the story which leads them to that conclusion. Tell them, from your hearts, why you feel passionately about the cause. Tell them what it means to you, but give them the option to give to a cause which matters to them. In that way all the gifts will be given in a spiritual manner which commemorates the spiritual connection between the two of you. Don't fuss about the wording. Write from the heart to connect with other hearts. Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.