WOMANHOOD IS NOT A COSTUME AND I WILL NOT BOW

WOMANHOOD IS NOT A COSTUME AND I WILL NOT BOW By Councillor Lisa Robinson Let me say this as clearly as I can: I know what a woman is. And I will not lie about it. Not for applause. Not for politics. Not for anyone. Because this world has gone mad — Not by accident, but by design. They’re not just erasing definitions. They’re erasing us. They say a man can be a woman — No effort. No sacrifice. No truth. Just a statement… and suddenly, he belongs in our change rooms, our sports, our shelters, our prisons. He can win our medals, steal our scholarships, knock our daughters out cold in the ring — and be called brave. And if we dare speak up? We’re silenced. Fined. Fired. Dragged through the mud by the very institutions that once claimed to protect us. Well, not me. I was not elected to play pretend. I was not elected to obey a delusion. I was elected to lead. And I will lead with truth — even if I’m the last one left saying it. Because womanhood is not a costume. It is not a feeling. It is not a slogan on a rainbow sticker. It is flesh and blood. It is sacrifice. It is sacred. And it is ours. They call it inclusion. But who exactly are we including — and at whose expense? When a teenage girl trains for years, only to be beaten by a man in a skirt — is that inclusion? When a female inmate is locked in a cell with a man who calls himself “she” — is that progress? When girls on rugby fields are knocked breathless by men with every physical advantage — is that compassion? No. It is betrayal. A betrayal of women. A betrayal of truth. A betrayal of every mother, daughter, and sister who fought to be seen, heard, and respected. And here’s what makes it worse: Politicians like me? We don’t have to live with these policies. We don’t share bathrooms with the opposite sex. We don’t lose our scholarships to men. We don’t get our faces bloodied in a cage and called equal. We just vote. Then walk out the back door — untouched by the chaos we create. I will not be that kind of leader. Because I believe in boundaries. I believe in women’s rights. And I believe that lying to protect feelings while destroying reality isn’t kindness — it’s cowardice. So yes — I will say what others won’t. A woman is a woman. An adult female with XX chromosomes A man is a man. With XY Chromosomes And no law, no label, and no amount of lipstick will ever change that. We are not interchangeable. We are not props in someone else’s identity crisis. We are not placeholders for men who want a new costume. We are women. And we are not going away. Let me speak now to the women listening — The ones afraid to speak, scared to be called names, but who know in their bones: this is wrong. You are not crazy. You are not alone. And you are not the problem. You are the front line. The defenders of reality. The torchbearers your grandmothers once were. We are the daughters of iron. The mothers of nations. The keepers of truth. And we do not bow. Not to mob pressure. Not to fake science. Not to cowards in suits who traded courage for comfort. When the history books are written, I want it said: That we stood. That we told the truth. That we would not betray our daughters to win favour with liars. Let them sanction me. Let them slander me. Let them try to silence me. I will still be here — With truth in my spine, Fire in my voice, And every woman before me standing behind my words. This is our moment. This is the line. And we will not step back. Not now. Not ever. Councillor Lisa Robinson The People’s Councillor Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Truth, But In The Courage To Face It Head On And Rise Above It – Lisa Robinson 2023

Losing a Father Is a Bundle of Hurt

Losing a Father Is a Bundle of Hurt By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford I was 6 years old when I first calculated how many years I could expect to have with my father. He was 44 when I was born; and therefore 50 when I turned 6. I decided I would be lucky if I got to 35 and still had him. That would be 79 for him, and I felt that was an old age. Can you imagine how lucky I feel to have had him until 101? I’m grateful beyond words. Now, I am taking up the responsibility of writing the Gifford-Jones column – not as a doctor, but as a communicator. The immediate necessity is to say something helpful, something important, about an experience many of us will have during our lives: losing a father. I investigated the research. No two ways about it, we take a physical and psychological hit. From cellular level aging brought on by the physical impacts of grieving (sustained stress, disrupted sleep, poor diet) to the cognitive effects of loss (depressed mood and outlook, more substance abuse behaviours, anxiety), the death of one’s father is a bundled package of hurt. What would my father say about it? This is a question I will be asking myself every week going forward. I know what he did when I was hurt as a child – the kind of hurt that had me crying, a bad scrape on the knee or the sting of a bee. He’d touch me in the affected spot and let his touch linger. “Now,” he said, after a time, “doesn’t that feel better?” I got his point. Readers will hear echoes of his constant mantra. “Don’t be a wimp. Don’t take pills when there is an effective, natural alternative.” He practiced what he preached. When my father turned 90, I started to prepare for the day he would slow down. But he didn’t. He was launching another phase of his crusades. And what for? To fight big pharma. To demand better pain management and end-of-life care. To advocate for natural health. And most of all, to call on all humanity to improve our increasingly lousy lifestyle. You may recall, he wanted to throw rotten eggs at the Parliament buildings! And he had a few choice words for the newspaper editors who ceased publishing his column. For the past six years, it’s been an extraordinary collaboration writing this column with my father. He told me, “Don’t be a journalist if you are going to sit on the fence.” On some issues, we had some heated discussions! But the interviews we did together, the visits to natural health food stores, and the talks in communities increasingly closer to home, these are the occasions I enjoyed the most. Going forward, I plan a few crusades too. I will have my own opinions, and they may not always line up with his. I have a Harvard degree like my father, but even better, I have one from Wellesley. I’ve worked alongside global health experts at the World Bank and in the most impoverished places you can imagine. I am an advisor to the presidents of universities. I know where to find the research and who to talk to. You can count on me to simplify the complexities, identify what’s important, and cut out any baloney. And yes, the advice will be sharp – because some things, thankfully, are hereditary. For now, like many of you, I am grieving the loss of my father. But I take comfort in knowing how lucky we are to have had him in our lives. Thank you for all your messages, tributes, and personal stories that are pouring in. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive my weekly e-newsletter. For comments, diana@docgiff.com. Follow on Instagram @diana_gifford_jones _________________________________________________________________________ Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Waterleaks are Costly

Waterleaks are Costly By Maurice Brenner Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering As a Regional Councillor I have been receiving an increasing number of calls regarding a higher than normal water bill. While rates have increased in an effort to ensure adequate funds are available to cover the infrastructure required to provide clean water to your home along with the charge for sanitary/waste disposal, I am finding that more and more residents have been impacted by a water leak resulting in a substantial increase on their Water Bill which is why I want to focus on some simple tests you can do before it costs you. Ways to Spot a Water Leak before it costs you! Did you know that water leaks in your home are very common. A majority of leaks are silent, and are hard to spot. These silent leaks can end up causing a higher-than-usual water and sanitary/wastewaterbill. Here are some simple tips to help detect a leak before it costs you and could save the cost of ripping apart your walls and ceilings. Check Your water Meter for consumption: Water consumption is measured by the amount of water that passes through your water meter. Before going to bed, write down the number on your water meter. In most homes the water meter is located in the basement towards the front of your home. Do not run sprinklers, appliances or toilets overnight. When you get up, check the number on your meter. If the number has changed, this indicates water has been running through it which means there is a possibility that you have a water leak somewhere inside or your house. Once you have determined a possible leak, before you call the plumber, check your toilets as well as a visual check for dripping facets. By narrowing it down, you save the cost of the plumber looking for the problem. How to Test for leaks: One of the most likely causes of a high water and wastewater bill is a running toilet. The best way to check for a running toilet is to: i Remove the tank lid from the back of the toilet. ii Put a dye tablet or five drops of food colouring in the toilet tank. You can also use Worcestershire sauce or another dark liquid. iii Close the toilet lid and wait 30 minutes – It is important not to use or flush the toilet during this time. After 30 minutes look at the water in the toilet bowl to determine if the the dyed water has found its way into into the bowel. If the bowl is clear and all that means the toilet likely doesn’t have a leak. iv Repeat this with every toilet in your home. v If you not been able to confirm the source is a running toilet, conduct a visual check of each of your facets, a little drip surprisingly adds up. A hot water drip will also increase your other utility bills Once you have confirmed the source or if unable to find the source call a licensed plumber, but if at all possible avoid the weekends when you will be paying a premium. There is no point in calling Durham Region since they are not responsible for any water leaks inside your home.

** REMEMBERING COUNCILLOR JOHN AKER ** THE FIRST OF MY NEW SUMMER SERIES COLUMNS

** REMEMBERING COUNCILLOR JOHN AKER ** THE FIRST OF MY NEW SUMMER SERIES COLUMNS I WRITE THIS COLUMN in memory of my friend and one-time colleague, John Aker. John served his community for 33 years - on both City and Regional Councils, as well as a decade at the Ontario Municipal Board. John said his final goodbye on Thursday February 4th, 2021, at the age of 78. This is his story. One meaningful event can make a world of difference for a young man who might be trying to navigate his way into the world of politics. For 29 year old John Aker, it was the decision by a close friend not to seek re-election. That announcement would lead to John putting his own name forward for a seat on Oshawa Council. The year was 1972. When I spoke with John in summer of 2020, he enjoyed recalling his first election win, an event that would set the stage for many such victories during his career. The ‘72 election was a watershed – not only for him but for the entire council. That year saw an incredible turnover, and John described it as an “exciting time”. When I asked him to share his memories of those with whom he served, John responded without hesitation, telling me his years on council were shared with “good spirited people” who tried to do the right thing for everyone. John was born in Edmonton, and came to Oshawa with his parents at the age of two, attending St Gregory School and O’Neill Collegiate. He would eventually go off to Queens University in Kingston, obtaining a Bachelor of Commerce degree, which he said held him in good stead. It was during his university days that John was fortunate enough to gain yearly summer employment at the William Street offices of General Motors. While many of his friends from school were doing manual jobs they didn’t like, he found himself wearing a jacket and tie, doing work he always felt was interesting. Over time, he would join Schofield-Aker Insurance in 1970, a firm bought by his father Reg Aker in 1954, eventually taking over the business in 1985. We talked about how different city council was back in the 1970’s, and he reminded me that most, if not all of those on council, did the job part time, as they were already fully employed. City hall staff were the full-time career professionals who held the most influence in those days. Since then, the number of full-time councilors (the term ‘alderman’ having been abolished) has increased significantly, and as such, the influence of municipal staff has - to a degree, waned. Long term, career politicians with a lot of experience are now more common. The formation of the Region of Durham in 1974 was the first major issue John would encounter as a city alderman, and we discussed the long debates and the intricacies involved with the amalgamation of policing, and the creation of various regional departments. He was proud of his involvement in helping to bring further growth by way of the Oshawa hospital expansion, as well as the establishment of the University of Ontario Institute of Technology, which he said helped transform this city from a one-industry town into a place where careers are now developed in many walks of life. Looking back, I encouraged John to recall some of the good times shared with those among his colleagues he most enjoyed working with. His first thoughts were about his friend Jim Potticary, who spent eight years as mayor. John told me everyone used to call Mayor Potticary “Gentleman Jim”, and that he’d never seen anyone enjoy a job quite as much. John did, however recall some difficult moments in his career, one of which took place a little too close to home. In 1992, a foster home for young offenders was proposed in his own neighbourhood. When residents became aware, they sent flyers door to door, and John would receive at least 65 telephone calls from concerned residents. The foster home never did receive approval, however the memory of that day remained in John’s mind, describing it to me as a daunting moment to stand in front of a group of angry residents that were also his neighbours. There were many significant issues over the years that John had to wrestle with, including Sunday shopping, the implementation of Oshawa’s first ward system, the ongoing battles with the Port Authority, downtown revitalization, and the debate over ‘transparency’ in government. John’s second stretch as a member of council (his first being 1973 to 1997) was probably the most challenging. His election in 2010 marked an incredible eight year, two-term comeback for a man who had years earlier decided to close the book on an honourable career. John showed everyone he had an important role to play as an ‘elder statesman’, bringing a voice of experience and reason to an otherwise unwieldy council. A September 2014 Article in the Globe and Mail described Oshawa Council at that time as a ‘political circus’ with elected members shouting each other down, citizens protesting and being tackled by undercover police, and a serious division among councilors. Still, John was able to stand on a solid footing and survive the melee, as the scenes that played out month after month went against his own desire to work with others to find common ground. John used to tell me with confidence that Oshawa will remain a prosperous city in the decades to come due to its geographic location between Toronto and Kingston. He said the amazing network of new highways will ensure further new development, the likes of which Oshawa has never before witnessed, and although something of the size and scope of General Motors may never be seen again, Oshawa definitely turned a corner in its pursuit of higher education that will meet the needs of generations to come. To quote my friend directly, “Whether we knew it or not, Oshawa long ago began a worthwhile transformation from a one industry town into a modern, cosmopolitan community where new opportunities exist.” John Aker gave as much as one man could to the community he truly loved.

ADVERTISING!!! OR DECEPTION?

ADVERTISING!!! OR DECEPTION? B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States They say we simulate what we see on television... If so, then this explains why I am missing most of tip of my fingers.... Ok. Stop laughing... Let me explain. Everyone has seen the McDonald commercial as that of most other hamburger chain ads.... A huge burger eaten by an actor.. Pretending they are getting a mouth full of burger with every bite. Only, to purchase one and the happy meals and the toy is a magnifying glass.... so that you can use on finding the burger on an overly small bun. Should these ads not be removed from broadcasting as they are misleading and not true to the reality of what is being served. Subway not to long ago got pinched by the government for advertising sandwiches that did not reflect the reality of what they serve. I know first hand.... Subway workers... appear to take offense when asked for more toping.... it is as it come out of their pay. Needless to say. I will not buy from Subway. But the food industry is not the only to blame. Have you seen the casino ads. Talk about deceptive. Not to mention the sea of ‘apps’ associated with major brand casinos. This is a horrible attempt at deception. To make comments as “COME FEEL THE FUN” and they show a formula one car racing through some casino arcade. Or the fancy graphic from particular themes.... making statements... The Fun awaits... Like really are there that many stupid people out there...... What am I saying.  There obviously are that many stupid people. Why would casino’s spend such revenue on the production of such an elaborate advertising campaign. It is as if we live in an era of the stupid... We are led to believe to be true things that defy logic. Things that make no sense... We are brought to edge of insanity with the promise of a better tomorrow all knowing that the sacred land is not attainable. I am not a gambler. I watch my kids play regular video games and rejoice on the completion of each stage... Only for me to look at them and think. They are being brain washed into believing they actually are playing a part on the outcome that has been pre-destined/set by some computer software engineer. The bottom line you never win... As success is based on your ability to make a sequence of mathematical choices. Much like in life. Success is not for everyone. We are genetically programmed to fail. Our social/education system constantly tests us. The casino industry plays on this. Promise the holy land and deliver the hell of the reality of loosing time and time again. The only difference in the video game model. You at least get to re-try for free. In the casino model. You keep loosing and loosing. Talk about loosing... Have you ever seen the Pharma commercials...beautiful displays of the promise land.... only to be told at the end that it does not really cure anything and if anything it may end up killing you.... (it is like having a head ache and Pharma sells you a bullet to shoot yourself in the foot. Head ache gone.) Life is complicated enough without misleading ads.

Tariffs -- Canada vs the United States

Tariffs -- Canada vs the United States by Maj (ret’d) CORNELIU, CHISU, CD, PMSC FEC, CET, P.Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The saga of tariffs continues at the mercy of the United States. President Donald Trump continues to weaponize import duties, cajoling and bullying nations to agree to hastily enacted trade deals that oftentimes fall woefully short of addressing even the most basic tenets of his perceived gripes. With deadlines set and postponed, he creates a continuous incertitude, more accurately referred to as chaos. This treacherous landscape makes for a bruising and precarious dialogue between North America’s two biggest trading partners and once-great friends. The announcement of a 35 per cent increase in tariffs on all Canadian goods by August 1 places Ottawa’s leaders between a proverbial rock and a hard place. Prime Minister Mark Carney will have a difficult job navigating these precarious turbulences. This is the environment Canadian negotiators find themselves in. One small misstep has the potential to send talks screeching to an abrupt halt, and the very real possibility of being on the bruising end of this unhinged President’s scathing tirades. As the Aug 1 deadline for a Canada-U.S. trade deal gets closer, Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated that it is unlikely a deal will be made without some level of tariffs. This was the first public admission from Carney although he recently expressed some doubt that Ottawa could immediately lift some of Trump’s tariffs during trade talks. President Donald Trump appeared to be losing patience with his administration’s efforts to make trade deals with nations around the world. The President has been sending letters to trading partners, including Canada, threatening to impose higher tariff rates on Aug. 1. The letter addressed to Carney last week said Canada would be hit with 35 per cent tariffs but the White House later stipulated it would not include goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. The President’s actions and approach to the tariffs issue is creating a very complicated trade problem to resolve. President Trump posted a letter to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on social media that said Mexico would be hit with a 30 per cent rate. A separate letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen declared a 30 per cent rate for the European Union. There is no clarity on why Canada is facing a higher tariff than either Mexico or the EU. It is strange but we are living in a strange world. Canada and Mexico are the top two U.S. trade partners, and Canada is a national security partner as well. Yet we have no reasonable explanation as to why Canada is hit with a 35 (per cent) tariff while Mexico only gets a 30 (per cent) tariff. Prime Minister Mark Carney has been proactive on defence and border security spending. It would be hard for the United States to claim Canada was not bargaining in good faith. While Canada was “nice,” it got hit with a tariff nearly as high as the 50 per cent Brazil is facing. It does not make any sense. It makes sense only if the President of the United States is still aiming to make Canada the 51 US state. In that case, putting such immense pressure on the Canadian economy might be an effort to make Canada surrender. Prime Minister Carney and President Trump have been negotiating what they have referred to as a new economic and security pact since the pair met at the White House in early May. At the G7 summit last month, Carney said they had set July 21 as a deadline for reaching that deal. However, Trump unilaterally delayed it to Aug 1st. Trump raised tariffs on steel and aluminum from 25 to 50 per cent in June and Carney has held off following suit pending the possibility of a deal. Canada has made a few other moves to aid industry on this side of the border, including new limits on the amount of foreign steel that can come in before high tariffs are charged. Canada also implemented a new interim policy on reciprocal procurement to restrict the ability of companies to bid on government contracts if their home country limits Canadian access to their government contracts President Trump has also raised the tariffs on copper by 50 per cent recently. According to data, the U.S. was Canada’s largest copper importer in 2023. In a Truth Social post, Trump’s ominous message portends the upheaval that is on the horizon. He stated, “America will, once again, build a DOMINANT Copper Industry. THIS IS, AFTER ALL, OUR GOLDEN AGE!” Let’s face it, there is a fundamental asymmetry in the Canada-U.S. trading relationship. We are largely in the business of exporting commodities and intermediate goods, and that gives president Trump a certain amount of advantage. However, it also exposes U.S. industries, U.S. manufacturers. We are already seeing evidence of that in the 50 per cent tariff on aluminum which creates problems for US manufacturers. In this surreal environment of trade negotiations with the United States I sincerely hope that Canada will emerge with the least amount of damage. Only time will tell if we have succeeded or not. It is a difficult job and needs real skill. Let us hope Prime Minister Carney and his team will be able to make the best deal for Canada. Long live Canada!

UN Human Rights Council Faces Criticism for Including Countries Accused of Abusing Women

UN Human Rights Council Faces Criticism for Including Countries Accused of Abusing Women By Dale Jodoin Geneva The United Nations Human Rights Council is once again under fire after new members were elected to its 47 nation panel, including several countries with poor records on women’s rights and human freedoms. The Human Rights Council, created in 2006 to promote and protect global human rights, has drawn criticism for allowing nations accused of human rights violations to serve on the very body meant to stop such abuses. Critics say that some of these countries treat women like second-class citizens or worse—and yet still sit in judgment of others. “It’s hard to take the Council seriously when it includes governments that don’t even give their own women basic rights,” said one analyst. “Some of these nations lock up protesters, punish free speech, and control women’s lives in ways that would never be accepted in democracies.” Women’s Rights Concerns Several current and former Council members have been called out by international human rights groups for strict control over women. In Iran, women can be arrested for not wearing the proper head covering, or hijab. In 2022, a young woman named Mahsa Amini died in police custody after being detained by Iran’s morality police. Her death led to widespread protests, which were met with crackdowns, beatings, and arrests. In Afghanistan, where the Taliban regained power in 2021, girls have been banned from attending school beyond grade six. Women are restricted from most jobs and cannot travel without a male guardian. Many are required to wear full-body coverings in public. In Saudi Arabia, women still live under a system of male guardianship. While some laws have been relaxed in recent years, many women must still seek permission from a male relative to travel, marry, or be released from prison. Some women’s rights activists remain in detention. Other countries, such as Somalia and Sudan, have also been accused of failing to protect women from abuse, forced marriage, or harmful practices like female genital mutilation. Double Standards Accused Despite these serious concerns, several of these countries have served or continue to serve on the Council. Meanwhile, Israel continues to face repeated criticism from the body, prompting allegations of political bias. Israel is the only country that is singled out in a permanent item on the Council’s agenda. Many human rights advocates and independent observers say this focus is unfair when other member states have far worse human rights records, including state violence and systemic abuse. “Israel is a democracy,” said one human rights scholar. “People there have freedom of speech, women vote, there’s a free press. But it gets condemned more than countries where women can’t even leave the house without permission.” In contrast, China, which has been accused of detaining over a million Uyghur Muslims in internment camps, and North Korea, known for extreme censorship and widespread starvation, have received far less attention from the Council in recent years. A History of Controversy The Human Rights Council was formed to replace the earlier Commission on Human Rights, which was shut down because it had allowed notorious rights violators to serve. Now, critics say the same problems are happening again. Countries are elected to the Council by the General Assembly through regional group votes. That system has allowed nations with poor human rights records to win seats, often uncontested. In recent elections, Iran, China, Sudan, Qatar, and Venezuela have all either served or competed for seats. Some critics argue that the Council has become more political than principled. “It’s no longer about protecting people,” said a former UN official. “It’s about scoring political points and protecting allies.” What Reform Might Look Like Some diplomats and rights organizations are now calling for stricter rules on membership. Ideas include banning countries with ongoing human rights investigations, requiring open voting, or even creating a separate watchdog group to review candidates before elections. Others suggest that Council votes should be tied to actual human rights records, not just regional agreements or backroom deals. So far, no major changes have been adopted. The Human Cost While diplomats argue and policies stall, people around the world continue to suffer. Women are denied education, protesters are jailed, and entire communities are silenced. Observers warn that unless the Council is reformed, it risks losing its credibility. “The world needs a real voice for human rights,” said one analyst. “But that voice gets weaker every time a government that hurts its own people is allowed to sit at the table.”

You Are a 'Perfect Fit' Job Seekers: Do Not Assume You Are a 'Perfect Fit'

Job Seekers: Do Not Assume You Are a 'Perfect Fit' By Nick Kossovan I repeatedly hear, or read it in online venting comments, as I'm sure you also do, something along the lines of "I've been job searching for over seven months and have applied to more than 600 jobs that I'm more than I'm a perfect fit for and only gotten three interviews." Tip: Never vent your frustrations on public forums, such as LinkedIn; it shows employers you can't control your emotions. It's not a brag that job seekers think it is to apply to over 600 jobs. Applying to more than 20 jobs a week—four quality applications a day—is akin to spraying and praying, which isn't a job search strategy; it's a lazy approach. However, I want to focus on the words "perfect fit," which are highly subjective due to the varying degrees of nuance that define what "perfect fit" means to the person using the term. When you claim you'd be a "perfect fit," you're basing your assumption on how you compare to the job description. Essentially, you're ticking off boxes, believing that if you tick all or most boxes, then you're a "perfect fit." What you're not considering is that you have no idea what's happening behind the scenes, and that a large part of hiring decisions comes down to gut feel. As I've mentioned in previous columns, being likeable supersedes your skills and experience. I don't know a hiring manager who hires candidates they don't like. It doesn't matter if you think you're a perfect fit. What matters is whether the person reading your résumé and interviewing you thinks you are. A candidate's skills and qualifications aren't the only factors considered in hiring decisions; also assessed: · How well you'll fit with the team—will the current team accept you?—and the company's culture. (Employers don't hire disruptors.) · Your communication and soft skills (These are my 'must-haves.' When hiring, my primary concern is the candidate's verbal and written communication skills.) · Your energy level. · Are you a flight risk? · Whether your qualifications are "too much" of a good thing. Then there's the elephant in the room: something you can't control. If the hiring manager sees you as a threat to their position, you're not a perfect fit. You wouldn't hire someone who could jeopardize your job or disrupt your team, so why would you expect the hiring manager to do differently? Unless you've spent time within the company, seeing how the sausage is made, attending boardroom meetings, speaking with hiring managers and employees at all levels, and eating in the lunchroom, you can't be certain you're a "perfect fit." You're assuming. You may believe your résumé matches the job description, but unless you're being referred, you have no insight into how the person you'll be reporting to leads and manages, or what keeps them awake at night. You don't know the challenges the company is facing or the internal politics at play. Since the concept of being a "perfect fit" is subjective, there's no guaranteed way to make yourself appear like the perfect fit. However, you can increase your chances of being considered a "perfect fit" by focusing less on your skills and qualifications and more on coming across as a safe, low-risk hiring choice—hiring managers tend to prefer candidates who won't be disruptors. Low risk = perfect fit One thing job seekers often overlook is that hiring decisions are visible to everyone in the company. Making a bad hire, which I've done several times, is never a good look and can cast doubt on your judgment skills. The last thing a hiring manager wants to hear is "Did you hire Bob? He's a train wreck!" Understandably, especially given today's job market, employees worry about keeping their jobs; therefore, they're concerned with how they're being perceived by their boss and their boss's boss. Being worried about "What will the boss and the team think?" is why hiring managers tend to prefer candidates who come across as predictable and low-risk. Consequently, being overqualified and having employment gaps are often viewed as liabilities, and why ageism persists. Rightly or wrongly, these factors are often considered high-risk red flags when making hiring decisions. In uncertain times, such as we're currently experiencing and will likely be for the foreseeable future, employers tend to favour candidates who appear steady rather than bold. There are three aspects of a candidate that determine whether they're likely to be a low-risk hire: 1. Ability to perform the job effectively 2. Shows stability TIP: In your résumé and LinkedIn profile, include the reason for your current career gap and explain what you're doing to stay current in your profession and industry. 3. Aligns well with the company culture Whenever you're being interviewed, it's because the employer believes you're qualified for the role. Ultimately, the purpose of an interview is to assess whether you'd be someone who'll likely fit well with the current team and culture. Here's what you need to accept: the decision whether you're a fit or not is entirely out of your hands. All you can do is show you're a "great match," but never assume you're a "perfect fit."

COMMUNITY VIOLENCE NEEDS ATTENTION

COMMUNITY VIOLENCE NEEDS ATTENTION By Councillor Lisa Robinson Over the last several months, the City of Pickering has been rocked by violence — the kind of violence no community should ever have to face. Let me remind everyone exactly what has happened in our city: On May 2, a man was found dead in Pickering — our city’s first homicide of the year. On May 29, an 83-year-old woman was stabbed to death in her own front yard by a 14-year- old boy. On July 5, a 69-year-old woman was killed in a suspicious house fire on Primrose Court — now confirmed to be a homicide. And just days ago, on July 11, a man’s body was found near Highway 401 and Whites Road — the fourth homicide in just over two months. Four lives gone. Four families shattered. And an entire city left asking: what is happening to Pickering? But it doesn’t stop there. We are also seeing an alarming rise in carjackings, violent home invasions, guns seized, and increasing threats to public safety — right here in our neighbourhoods. Partner violence is up. Mental health breakdowns are up. Homelessness is rising. And far too many people feel abandoned — by the very system that’s supposed to protect them. Let me be absolutely clear: this is not just a public safety crisis. This is a crisis of leadership. Because while the violence rises, City Hall stays silent. While families mourn, the headlines vanish. And while people feel afraid to walk down their own streets, not a single elected official is standing up to say: Enough. Well, I will. To the families of the victims — I offer my deepest condolences. No words can take away your pain, but please know this: you are not alone. If you need support, I will do everything I can to help. I will fight to make sure your loved one is not forgotten. And I will never stop demanding justice — not just for them, but for every single resident who calls this city home. To the people of Pickering — I hear your fear. I feel your frustration. But I also know your strength. We are a city of good, hardworking people — and we deserve to live without fear. We deserve leaders who care. And we deserve a system that puts the safety and wellbeing of its people above political games and bureaucratic silence. I was elected to serve — not to sit quietly while our city unravels. And I say this today not just as a councillor, but as a mother, as a neighbour, and as someone who loves this community deeply: This city needs leadership. Real leadership. Leadership that’s not afraid to tell the truth, to face the hard problems, and to stand up for the people — no matter the cost. So I’m here. I’m standing firm. And I’m not going anywhere. Because the safety of our people is not negotiable. Because every life matters. Because this is our home — and I intend to protect it. Thank you. And may God be close to the brokenhearted tonight. Kind regards, Lisa Robinson “The People’s Councillor” City of Pickering “Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head On And Rise Above It” - Lisa Robinson 2023

HERITAGE OSHAWA IS ACTING LIKE THE ONTARIO LAND TRIBUNAL BY GOING AGAINST THEIR OWN MANDATE

HERITAGE OSHAWA IS ACTING LIKE THE ONTARIO LAND TRIBUNAL BY GOING AGAINST THEIR OWN MANDATE WHILE UNDERTAKING RESEARCH on local issues concerning City Hall and its various committees, I have found some enjoyment in watching the online videos you’ll see posted on the City of Oshawa website. I went into the latest such recording of the Heritage Oshawa committee with an abundance of energy, because before the meeting even began, I knew much more than usual about items on their agenda. Which brings our attention to the property known municipally as 853 Simcoe Street South, being a one-and-a-half storey century home built in or around the year 1900. The home was included in a list formulated by Heritage Oshawa volunteers in 1998 as part of their effort to identify properties within the city that show built-heritage value – meaning they have architectural and overall design features that make them unique. The house in question is almost one of a kind, with no less than two ground floor walk-in bay windows, and a unique front porch assembly which includes a main entry door placed 90 degrees from the road. Upstairs, there is a large dormer immediately above one of the bay windows – the rest of the roof area sloping at a somewhat sharp angle, typical of Victorian architecture. This dormer may have been an add-on, or may have originally included a door to a small balcony – a common feature among homes built at the turn of the 20th century. I like to think my knowledge of Oshawa, and the many older homes that fill the neighbourhoods around the centre and southern portions of the city, as being extensive. The remaining inventory of brick-clad Victorian-style homes, already reduced in number, is under constant threat of demolition, and we can include 853 Simcoe Street South as being among them. The property owner appeared before the Heritage committee to request the house be removed from the 1998 list of ‘Class B’ structures – his primary concern being the affect it may have on his current attempt to sell the home on the open market. It is currently listed for sale as a “rental income generating property” and may be viewed on the Realtor.ca website. According to the owner, the inclusion of this house on the list of properties considered to be of heritage interest has spooked potential purchasers for fear it will receive an official Heritage designation – which may impede its ultimate demolition. This, in spite of the assertion on Realtor.ca that the house and property generate a total monthly income of $7000 or more. During his presentation to committee members (Robert Bell and John O’Boyle having both declared a conflict on the item), the property owner offered the following assessment, “To me it’s very clear that if anybody was to look on Google…that home today on Google…there’s nothing at all that resembles anything Heritage at all about that property.” As it happens, a majority of those on the committee were prepared to side with him, and below are a few of their comments made to justify their position. Ward 2 City Councillor Jim Lee offered these assurances to the property owner, “I totally support the removal of your property from Class ‘B’…and I think you spoke very well with regard to, there’s no heritage value there.” Committee member Sarah Smale had some very singular observations on the matter. “So I drove past the property on my way here because that’s my route, and looking at it as I was driving past, I don’t understand why it’s currently on the list… There’s no heritage look to it… I would say no heritage attributes to the outside, so I would definitely be in favour of letting it off the list.” Not to be outdone by his colleagues, committee member James Bountrogiannis had these seemingly intelligent thoughts on the issue, “Why do we call it (Class) ‘B’ if it is undesignated? Oh, it’s something to do. So, let’s get rid of it.” Do you see a pattern developing in these comments from committee members? The only person to even remotely come to the defence of, not only the future of an unquestionably unique home of built-heritage value, but also the realities surrounding the Class ‘B’ list, was the committee Vice-Chair Diane Stephen. With no-one to support her, she appeared to do her best to add an element of reason to the debate, and in doing so she offered these comments directly to the property owner, “Our information comes from research done over the years. We have an inventory of ‘heritage Oshawa’ and your house is listed in here, along with quite a number of other ones, and it’s listed as being built in the 1900’s which makes your house 125 years old. “ These comments apparently did not sit well with Councillor Jim Lee, who took the Vice-Chair to task when he asked, “Being relatively new to the Heritage committee, are we basing ‘designation’ of heritage (sic) buildings based on when they’re built?” The Vice-Chair was quick to remind the councillor that the property at 853 Simcoe St. S. was not being considered for Heritage designation, and that there is “no stepping stone to designation… There’s no ‘B’ then you’re elevated to ‘A’ and then you end up being designated… That’s not how it works.” She would go on to tell her colleagues prior to calling a vote on the issue, “I just want to clarify, it’s not designated…this property is not designated.” As it happened, those remarks would prove ultimately ineffective, as the committee voted to remove the property from the list of structures deemed worthy of heritage interest. At this stage, I would like to offer my readers a few key takeaways from what transpired during the meeting. First and foremost is the flippant manner in which committee member Sarah Smale apparently came to her decision. To suggest, as she did, that a mere drive-by glance is either in whole, or in part, a suitable method of deciding the fate of a historically unique structure, is tantamount to a betrayal of her role to work at preserving Oshawa’s built heritage. One would hope Ms Smale may learn from her mistake, otherwise her resignation from the committee would seem a reasonable expectation. Secondly, the remarks by Ward 2 City Councillor Jim Lee were nothing less than adversarial towards the committee itself, or at least the mandate under which it operates. He showed himself to be no friend or advocate of heritage preservation, and unless his views change, residents of Oshawa may well see many more unique properties threatened by the wrecker’s ball. I will be watching this committee very closely in the weeks and months to come.

HAS THE PLANNING DEPT CONFUSED IT’S MISSION?

HAS THE PLANNING DEPT CONFUSED IT’S MISSION? B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States In a time when everything and anything seems to be acceptable. It appears that the City of Oshawa Planning Department has had it’s mission compromised. It appears they are more bent over planting trees and putting up parks at taxpayers expense then properly planning the future for Oshawa. Then again they are just doing their job. If we voted in a disfunctional council. Staff will not go out of their way to all of a sudden become the sacrificial lamb for council. If we learned anything from 1945 Germany is that just doing your job excuse does not cut it. They say we must learn from our mistakes. I guess we are just evolving into a species of mentally challenged populi....Or we are just plain stupid. Not to long ago... as a matter of fact just before the last municipal election millions of dollars were used in the so called ‘ED BROADBENT’ park. A park next to another park. Primarily ‘Lakeview Park’. Did the people need another park next to an existing park? Could that money not gone to help local downtown businesses that are closing faster then ever? Where is the leadership? Where is the Mayor and council? Playing important as they open a park for their political gain. Now, don’t get me wrong. The park is nothing but an open field. This is Canada. Who is going to go in the middle of winter? Who is going to go in the middle of the ‘HOT CANADIAN’ summers. In my opinion that park is a total waste of tax payers dollars. Not to long ago they announced the ‘rotary pool’ fiasco. Wake up planning department... An outdoor pool in Canada!!! Really. Why not have a retractable roof so it may be used all year around. POOR PLANING. Just a few weeks back. The City decided to give away 70 million to the local hockey team. 70 million in building upgrades. A building that has yet to make a penny for taxpayers. A building that to my understanding is costing taxpayers almost half a million to maintain. Then why the money give away. Is the Mayor a moron. Are city council members on the take? What other explanation could there be? Not to ad insult to injury... but now the same planning department and city council is sinking more millions in an ‘URBAN PARK’. An urban park in a downtown that looks like downtown Baghdad after a bombing raid. More wasted millions... Downtown business need a parking garage... Not a park for the local homeless to invade. Or is it that in the spirit of population growth. Memorial park has over flowed with the homeless and more bushes and trees to urinate on and defecate are required. We have a chamber of commerce that has no teeth...unless you belong to the brown nose club of municipal wanna be’s. We have no support for downtown businesses. The quality of life is beyond despicable. The only businesses left are old grandfathered stores... lot of pot shops. A few restaurants... The main problem is ‘NO PARKING’. Then the huge number of homeless, drug addicts, drug trade, prostitution. Workers fear coming to work. Yes, let’s keep building parks...that is going to solve the problem. Urban park, the homeless home away from Memorial park... Their new summer home... wow.

The revival of Canada is beginning

The revival of Canada is beginning by Maj (ret’d) CORNELIU, CHISU, CD, PMSC FEC, CET, P.Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The severe shock received by Canada from its neighbor to the South seems to have energized the sleeping giant of enormous resources to finally wake up. It is now clear that both the federal and provincial governments are looking to take decisive steps to make Canada into a powerful economic entity. It is the right time to do this and has been long overdue. The first major projects of the Canadian government’s signature nation-building initiative are likely to be drawn from several key areas that have emerged as “shared priorities” between Ottawa and the provinces. We can easily see the areas in which significant progress will be made. These include attention to the Western and Arctic Corridor, Critical Minerals development, the Next Stage of Nuclear development, and Export Diversification Infrastructure, to name a few. As Canadian citizens, we may be amazed to see how quickly the Canadian political establishment shook off its long endured coma and started to act in our best interests. It is a pleasure to see the whole country energized and all the stakeholders getting ready to act rapidly to put our country in the right place on the world map. Canada has resources, which can be put to work rapidly and wisely to provide a better life for its citizens. Prime Minister Mark Carney seems to be taking an unprecedented lead setting up summits with stakeholders, to ensure that the federal and provincial governments will continue discussions with proponents on feasibility and specific projects that could be advanced under Bill C-5. The Carney government hopes to supercharge Canada’s economic growth and mitigate damage from tariffs levied by the United States by streamlining federal approvals for major projects deemed to be of national importance under new provisions laid out in Bill C-5, which passed Parliament at the end of June. Provincial and territorial premiers were invited to submit project ideas, though the federal cabinet alone will decide which projects to fast-track. These decisions will be based on factors such as whether the proposal strengthens Canada’s economy or security, the likelihood of it being successful and whether it also advances the interests of Indigenous peoples or contributes to clean and rapid growth. Of particular interest to me, is the attention that is finally being paid to western and arctic corridor development; something I proposed more than ten years ago that fell on deaf ears at the time. One proposal that has gained momentum among the Western premiers is an economic corridor connecting British Columbia’s northwest coast through the Prairies to Hudson’s Bay, eventually linking by road to an Arctic port in Grays Bay, Nunavut. Western premiers in May pledged to begin planning port-to-port-to-port infrastructure, including roads, rail, power generation, transmission and pipelines, which could help deliver more energy, critical minerals, agricultural goods and manufactured goods to tidewater for export to both Asian and European markets. Obviously the most valuable and contentious component of the corridor would be the construction of a new oil export pipeline, (potentially paired with a major carbon-capture project in the oil sands) to the Hudson Bay first and then eventually under Hudson Bay to Nunavut in the Arctic. Besides the oil pipe line the arctic corridor has great potential for simultaneously developing the exploitation of critical minerals and the build-up of infrastructure to support mining, processing and exports, including roads, clean power generation, transmission lines and grid connections. Canada currently ranks “near the bottom” in terms of mine development timelines, Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada director Jeff Killeen said, with it sometimes taking more than 25 years for a viable project to go from initial discovery to production. “Part of that extensive timeline comes from the infrastructure gap that we’re talking about right now in many parts of the country,” he said. The Western and Arctic corridor also overlaps with another key category of major projects, the so-called next stage of nuclear, since boosting Saskatchewan’s uranium ore mining sector could increase exports while simultaneously supporting Ottawa’s ambitions for expanding the next generation of nuclear technologies, regaining the world lead in the field. Ontario is currently constructing the first commercial-scale small modular reactor project among the Group of Seven industrialized nations, and provinces such as Saskatchewan, Alberta and New Brunswick are hoping to follow suit with the help of Ontario Power Generation Inc. In this context it would be advisable to construct small nuclear reactors in the developing regions in need of energy and then connect them to a suitable grid There are also proposals to refurbish Canada’s aging Candu reactor technology that could be fast-tracked under Bill C-5. Of great interest are projects in the field of critical minerals of which the Carney government has said the world is bullish on Canada’s potential to supply critical minerals, so projects that capitalize on this opportunity are likely to draw attention as part of the nation-building initiative. The Ontario government’s proposed multi-billion-dollar investment in the mineral-rich Ring of Fire region looms large on the list. Premier Doug Ford has put developing the vast region at the top of his priority list and is looking to speed assessments of some key components of the project under Bill C-5, including portions of a three-part road network proposed to provide access to the Ring of Fire. Other projects in the pipeline that seem to be high on the consideration list are projects related to export diversification infrastructures. These are in the field of energy and natural resource infrastructure, and transportation projects such as roads and railways. The hope is that these projects will create jobs while helping Canada’s exports reach different trading partners. Canada finally seems to be on the right path to once again becoming a great and respected country on the world scene. Let us keep up the good work.

Sink or Swim- the Reality of How Teens see High School

Sink or Swim- the Reality of How Teens see High School By Camryn Bland Youth Columnist Most teenagers believe high school is the most stressful experience they will ever endure. Of course, that opinion usually changes when they hit university, and then when they get a full time job, and then when they have to tackle their own family. However, until adolescents graduate high school, nothing will compare to the struggles of secondary education. Trying to balance culminating projects, final exams, extracurricular activities, and a personal life can be a huge challenge, and often I fear it is too much to handle. My educational anxiety is mostly my own doing, as most of my daily stressors are ones I have put on myself. I may not choose to take final exams, but I do choose to participate in multiple extracurriculars, take classes which are more intense, and volunteer to help with extra work. This is because I am one of the teenage oddities who enjoys school, at least for the most part. I enjoy going to elective classes of my choice, which are usually focused on humanities, language arts, and performance arts, opposed to science or technology. I am a dedicated student, with a final grade of 90% or higher in every one of my classes. During my grade 10 year, I participated in 7 extracurricular activities, ranging from pro/con debate, to morning badminton, to a musical theater ensemble. Overall, I see high school as a great opportunity to try new things, learn what interests you, and make connections. It is a place to make friends, to decide who you want to be, and to experiment with what you want to do for the rest of your life. When put that way, high school sounds like a fantastic experience which every teen will enjoy. Unfortunately, that is not the full high school picture. Although it may be enjoyable, it is also extremely overwhelming. Since I began ninth grade, I have grown to be a perfectionist, aiming to be the best in every one of my classes. When thinking rationally, I know this is not always realistic, especially while also juggling 7 extracurriculars. However, I pressure myself anyways, and continue to do whatever it takes to reach 100%. Sometimes this pays off, and I reach my goals; other times, it’s extremely damaging to my mental health. When my grades aren’t as good as I hoped, when I get an 80% instead of a 90%, it feels like an attack on my self esteem. This isn’t just an isolated issue of mine; almost every student feels overwhelmed by their workload, even if they don’t experience the same perfectionism. Maybe it’s due to that one concept in class they just don’t understand, or perhaps they have an unpleasant teacher. Possibly, the student has a learning disability, or they just have no interest in the classes they are taking. No matter the reason, high school is something most teenagers dread on a daily basis. They skip class, beg their parents to stay home, and take mental health days, all so they can avoid the anxiety of being in a classroom, at least for one more day. Academics are not the only stressors for students. In addition to juggling assignments and extracurricular activities, teens are also figuring out who they are as individuals, and navigating a complicated social life. Adolescence is a crucial period for developing a sense of self and identity. It’s when individuals are forced to answer the question, who am I? What makes me happy? What motivates me? As teens develop their sense of self, their social life is affected. They may find new friends, or old ones may drift away. Every day, friends fight, young couples break up, and rumors get spread. It’s a time when everything feels uncertain, and everything is anxiety-inducing. All of these struggles then cause teens to turn away from exciting opportunities. A student hates their classes, so they don’t care to expand their learning. They are mentally drained at the end of the day and just want to go home, so they miss opportunities to see their friends. They fear failure, so they don’t try out for any teams or clubs. These issues may seem mundane, but altogether, they create a continuous cycle of anxiety and disappointment. Daily life can feel like sink or swim, and most students are just treading water. Finding the balance between academics, extracurriculars, self identity, and a social life can feel difficult, but it’s a crucial step for every teenager. Only with this balance will secondary education reach its full potential as a place to learn, make friends, and find yourself.

Taxed to Death: Why Canadians Are Going Underground

Taxed to Death: Why Canadians Are Going Underground By Dale Jodoin Every day, more Canadians wake up wondering how they’re going to make it to the end of the month. Prices are up, wages are flat, and the only thing growing is the list of taxes on everything we do. Rent is now so high it feels like a joke. Grocery bills are eating paychecks whole. Power prices are through the roof, and with the government pushing electric cars on everyone, don’t expect that to change anytime soon. They keep telling us this is all for the greater good. That it’s about saving the planet or growing the economy or whatever new excuse they roll out. But regular Canadians aren’t seeing the benefit. They’re being left behind. What we’re seeing is the slow death of the middle class, and worse, the rise of a new kind of silent economy one where you have to hide what you earn just to survive. The Liberals and the NDP have turned Canada into a land of hidden hustle. Not the fun kind of hustle you post about on Instagram. This is quiet, backdoor work. This is cutting lawns for cash, fixing cars in the garage, selling baked goods out of your kitchen, or helping people move for a twenty-dollar handshake. No paperwork. No receipts. No CRA. Why? Because the second you play by the rules, the system bleeds you dry. That’s the new Canadian reality. You can work hard, pay your taxes, follow the law, and still not afford a normal life. Or you can take your chances, keep your mouth shut, and do what needs to be done. And it’s not just a few people doing this anymore. It’s spreading. Fast. The only way to survive in this new Canada is to stop telling the government everything. That sounds harsh, maybe even illegal, but look around. We’re being pushed into it. The government will call it tax fraud. They’ll say you’re a criminal. But what do you call it when a system forces its people to go broke for simply trying to live? We used to be proud of our country. We used to brag about how great Canada was. But now, more and more people are ashamed. Not of being Canadian but of what’s being done in our name. While Ottawa talks about equality, they give handouts to people who just arrived while the ones who’ve worked here all their lives get told to wait. While the elite throw money at green energy plans and fancy carbon credits, average folks can’t even fill their gas tank. And while politicians pose for the cameras, Canadians are sitting in the dark because they can’t pay the power bill. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. This is everyday life now. The rich are still rich. The poor are still poor. But the working class, the ones who kept the country going, are being punished for simply existing. It’s not about right or left anymore. It’s about survival. People are afraid to speak up. They’re afraid their neighbours might report them. They’re afraid of audits, fines, or worse. We’ve created a country where you don’t know who to trust, where even doing an honest day’s work might come back to bite you if you mention it to the wrong person. That’s not freedom. That’s fear. And the fear is growing. The more the government taxes, the more people hide. And the more people hide, the more the government tightens its grip. It’s a loop. One that’s hard to break. And they know it. They want control. They don’t want independent Canadians. They want dependents. They want us poor, desperate, and obedient. That’s why they tax small businesses harder than corporations. That’s why they punish side hustles but let billion-dollar companies skate by with loopholes. That’s why they praise people who rely on government programs, but shame the ones who try to make it on their own. They’re building a country where hard work doesn’t pay and independence is punished. But there’s still a fight left in us. There are still people out there who aren’t ready to give up. If you’ve got a skill for anything from carpentry to cutting hair you need to keep it close and keep it quiet. Don’t advertise online. Don’t trust platforms that track you. Use word of mouth. Free papers. Posters on local boards. Your neighbour’s garage. Keep it small, keep it moving, and keep the government out of it. That might sound un-Canadian to some, but ask yourself: what’s more Canadian than helping your neighbour, working hard, and asking for nothing but a fair chance? That’s not a crime. That’s community. This isn’t about greed. It’s about survival. The people who defend the system will keep calling us lazy, selfish, or paranoid. But they’re the ones who benefit from it. They’re the ones who get the subsidies, the free education, the special grants, the electric car rebates, the carbon credit bonuses. Regular Canadians get none of that. We just get taxed. Again and again. And if we complain? We’re told we’re the problem. That we need to sacrifice more. That we need to work harder. We’ve been doing that. And we’re done. If this country wants to keep the lights on, it better start listening to the ones paying the bills. Because when we all go underground, the system will collapse. And maybe that’s what it needs. Maybe it’s time to stop pretending that everything’s fine. Because it’s not. The country we knew is gone. And if we want to survive what’s coming next, we can’t wait for someone to save us. We have to save ourselves. Quietly. Carefully. Together.

Court Finds Employer Broke Contract, Awards $456,908 to Dismissed Executive

Court Finds Employer Broke Contract, Awards $456,908 to Dismissed Executive By Tahir Khorasanee, LL.M. Senior Associate, Steinbergs LLP In a case that underlines the importance of sticking to written agreements, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ordered Artisan Development Labs Inc. and its subsidiary, Artisan Cell Labs Inc., to pay $456,908 to former Executive Vice-President Dr. Nicholas Timmins. The court concluded that Artisan “by their correspondence and actions” repudiated—meaning fundamentally broke—the employment contract when they dismissed Dr. Timmins and failed to honour the severance terms it had promised. A Contractual Promise Unfulfilled Dr. Timmins began working for Arte­san’s American parent company in November 2019, earning an annual salary of $475,782 CAD, plus stock options, benefits and a performance bonus. In 2021 he moved to Toronto to establish Artisan Cell Labs Inc., the company’s Canadian operation, and was promoted to Executive Vice-President. His 2019 employment agreement clearly stated that if he was dismissed without cause, he was entitled to the greater of: Three months’ pay in lieu of notice, or His minimum statutory entitlement under Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA). Despite this clear promise, in March 2023 Dr. Timmins received only one week of ESA-minimum notice pay. The letter explaining his termination also tied any additional severance to Dr. Timmins signing a “full and final release,” which would bar him from pursuing any further claim against the company. What “Repudiation” Means When one side to a written contract shows—by words or by conduct—that it no longer intends to be bound by the contract’s terms, courts call that a “repudiation.” In such cases, the innocent party can treat the contract as ended and seek damages under common-law rules. Here, Justice Callaghan agreed with Dr. Timmins that Artisan’s insistence on a release before paying contractual severance made no sense if the company truly intended to honour its three-month notice promise. How the Court Calculated Damages Rather than simply order the three months’ payment, the court moved to assess a fair amount of notice under common law, applying the familiar Bardal factors: Age (44 years) Length of service (3.5 years) Character of employment (senior executive role) Availability of similar work (niche gene-therapy sector) Balancing these considerations, Justice Callaghan set a nine-month notice period. Nine months’ worth of salary, benefits, pension contributions, phone allowance and a prorated bonus totals $456,908. A Warning Shot to Employers For businesses of all sizes, the decision is a vivid reminder: honour your written termination clauses. If you condition contractual severance on signing a broad release—or impose any hidden requirement—courts may find you have repudiated the contract, leaving you exposed to larger common-law awards. Practical Takeaways Draft Clear, Stand-Alone Clauses: Ensure severance or notice provisions are written plainly and without strings attached. Separate Release Agreements: If you require a release or confidentiality covenant, present it in a distinct document—not as a condition to pay what’s already owed. Train HR Teams: Make sure those who handle terminations understand that contractual entitlements must be honoured in full. Budget Accordingly: Factoring in the risk of repudiation claims can save six-figure surprises down the road. Broader Impact Although this dispute involved a high-earning executive in the biotech field, the ruling has implications for workers at every level. Any employee whose contract specifies a fixed amount of severance or notice, now has clear authority to demand common law severance, which is often much higher than the contractual amount. Case Reference: Timmins v. Artisan Cells, 2025 CanLII 2387 (Ont. S.C.J.) Disclaimer: This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

The Toughest Column to Write

The Toughest Column to Write By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford A few days ago, I departed this planet with great reluctance during this, my 102nd trip around the sun. But I offer these final words with readers. I have never missed a week in over 50 years of writing this column. Possibly this persistence will help me squeeze through the Pearly Gates! Some will say, “Not bloody likely.” As I look back on my journalism career, it reminds me of the introduction to the book, A Tale of Two Cities. It was the best of times; it was worst of times. There were times when my life was threatened because I took on controversial issues, particularly the right of women to safe abortion. Opponents found fault with my work to legalize heroin for the treatment of terminal cancer pain. One well-known health organization labelled me “a headline-seeking medical journalist.” Other critics lied about the pain-killing advantages of heroin. When finally legalized, some hospitals set up foolish roadblocks to heroin’s use as pain therapy. Do I have regrets? Yes, the anxiety my work caused my family. I could have avoided trouble. But I’d have been an awful hypocrite, and I can’t stand hypocrisy. Besides, my DNA has never allowed me to be a fence-sitter. So, apart from some difficult bumps along the way, being a surgeon and medical journalist has been a wonderful dual ride, and “the best of times”. Final advice for readers? Remember, “If you keep going to hell you will eventually get there.” Living with a faulty lifestyle, fools attempt at the end of life what smart people do at the start. So, don’t fall victim to “pillitis” and take a pill for every ache and pain. Take prescription drugs for the shortest possible time, as they almost always add risks of terrible side effects. Above all, keep in mind what I stressed for years, that many natural remedies in health food stores are safe, less expensive, and should be tried first before prescription drugs, surgery, or other medical treatments. I want to mention the vital role that Susan, my wife, played. As my editor, she frequently kept me out of trouble with the words, “You can’t say that!” She was right 99 percent of the time. I’ll miss her presence, guidance, and love more than I can say. If there is a Pearly Gate I will be waiting at it for her and my family. I’m fortunate that my daughter, Diana, will carry on this column. She was too smart to become a doctor, and that’s why readers will learn a lot from her perspective on health and wellbeing, and about how the world actually works. How I’ll miss my almost daily chats with her. On a philosophical note, I was convinced long ago that “The problems of society are caused by so-called intelligent people who are largely fools.” I haven’t changed my mind. Shakespeare was right when he wrote “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves.” Unfortunately, humans have never learned the Golden Rule, “Do unto others as would you have them do unto you.” Do I have any last wishes? Yes, I’ve always said, “Freedom of the press only belongs to those who own the newspaper.” So, whatever type of media exists behind those Pearly Gates, I want total ownership. I hope a loving God shares my opinion. My best wishes to all readers and editors for good health and longevity. W. Gifford-Jones _________________________________________________________________________ Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Know before you sign by Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist

Know before you sign by Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist By Theresa Grant Real Estate columnist As an option to purchasing a cottage, many people purchase a trailer. There are a few different types but if you are purchasing a trailer as opposed to buying a cottage, chances are you are going to purchase one in an established trailer park. I myself had a great trailer for many years in a park in Trent River, a little hamlet next to Havelock, Ontario. That is the most common scenario for trailers. There are a few others and that is what I am going to shed some light on here today. When you head out of the city in any direction you eventually find yourself in beautiful farm country of some sort. With so many lakes and rivers in Ontario there are thousands of parcels of land for sale in the province. Some large others small. Some with water on the property or adjacent to a lake river or stream. A new build is often attractive to people who feel they cannot afford to purchase an established property. In that scenario, you buy the land and then at some point, and there is usually no time limit, you build your house on your land. Some one came to me recently and told me that they had done exactly that. They had purchased a beautiful large vacant waterfront lot in a small hamlet east of Oshawa. The lot was fully serviced, meaning it had hydro and water available. The couple were thrilled that they had this beautiful lot. They purchased a 40-foot house trailer and had it delivered to the lot. After some settling in, everything looked gorgeous. They soon received notice from the township that there were no trailers allowed on the property. They were devastated. They were on the hook for the trailer because they had just purchased it. They also were the owners of the parcel of land. They had no idea that there would be such a problem given that they were the owners of the land. They had seen other trailers in other areas sitting nicely at the water’s edge and never thought that they would have this issue. There was in fact a bylaw for that area that there were no trailers allowed on a vacant lot. Not even while you build your house. The morale here is to never assume that what is perfectly okay in one area is alright in another. Not even in the same area. I would personally go to the city or town office with the paperwork of the lot or parcel I was planning to purchase and have them sign off on what is or isn’t allowed before I would sign on the dotted line. Too many people sign first and ask questions later. This can get very expensive if you try to fight it or try to get a variance for your property. In the end your best bet is always to do your home work.

WE LOST A GREAT ONE…

WE LOST A GREAT ONE... B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States With sadness in my heart I report to you today the passing of a great man. A man that was a friend and associate and an over all exceptional human being. He was one of our first columnist at the Central over 30 years ago. Dr. Ken Walker was born in Croydon, England, the son of Walter and Annie Walker. At the age of three, his parents emigrated to Montreal and later moved to Niagara Falls, Ontario. He received premedical training at the University of Toronto and graduated from the Harvard Medical School. He trained in surgery at the University of Rochester, McGill University and later at the Harvard Medical School. He was also a family doctor, hotel doctor at the Manoir Richelieu Hotel at Murray Bay, Quebec, and ship’s surgeon where on his first Atlantic crossing had to remove the captain of his command due to illness. For 25 years Dr. Walker practiced as gynecological surgeon in Niagara Falls and then was appointed to the staff at Toronto Western and Toronto General hospitals. He authored 10 books and was a medical journalist for over 50 years, published by dozens of newspapers in Canada and the U.S. under the pseudonym, W. Gifford-Jones M.D. A strong advocate for women’s rights, medical assistance in dying, and common-sense health, one of his many campaigns was to legalize heroin in Canada to ease the pain of terminal cancer. He was a founding member of The Lincoln Trust and Savings Company. His foundation provided funds to establish the Gifford-Jones Professorship in Pain Control and Palliative Care at the University of Toronto Medical School. He often joked that he was refused admission to the University of Toronto Medical School so was forced to attend Harvard where the admission standards were lower, grateful to be accepted at the Harvard Medical School and even more grateful to graduate. His column stressed over the years the advantages of living a healthy lifestyle. He often wrote about controversial issues, and never as a fence-sitter. As occasionally his columns were rejected by editors, he often expressed the hope that, if there is a Valhalla somewhere, he would own all the newspapers. Dr. Walker enjoyed 70 years with Susan, his wife and constant companion. He will be missed by Susan, his four children and 12 grandchildren. He will be missed and never forgotten. Ken Walker M.D. (W. Gifford-Jones M.D.) February 28,1924 – July 1, 2025

Provincial Regulatory Bodies -- a brake on the development of Canada

Provincial Regulatory Bodies -- a brake on the development of Canada by Maj (ret’d) CORNELIU, CHISU, CD, PMSC FEC, CET, P.Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East Lead by Prime Minister Mark Carney, the federal government is rapidly taking steps to eliminate the interprovincial trade barriers under its jurisdiction. It has now removed all 53 federal exemptions in the Canada Free Trade Agreement that would inhibit interprovincial trade. The Prime Minister had significantly reduced the number of federal barriers prior to the spring election, but there were still almost two dozen exemptions left in place, primarily for national security reasons. The Liberals’ Bill C-5, aimed at removing the federal barriers to internal trade and labour mobility, was passed nearly unanimously by MPs on June 20, shortly before the House rose for the summer break. The bill moved onto the Senate and was passed late last week, jut before the first of July, as promised. Some provinces have themselves been taking action to remove internal trade barriers, signing agreements and memorandums of understanding to do so. Despite this, several sticking points remain in place and many interprovincial trade barriers continue to exist. These include geographic restrictions on the sale of certain goods, regulatory and policy differences across jurisdictions, and hurdles to labour mobility. The committee on internal trade — made up of provincial ministers and premiers representing all of Canada’s provinces and territories — is set to convene on July 8, at which point it will lay out any progress individual jurisdictions have made to scrap their own exceptions under the trade agreement. One of the main issues is the reluctance of provincial licensing bodies to act in the interest of Canadians rather than their own self-interest. Basically, nothing has changed on the licensing of foreign trained Canadians in the last half century. There are still barriers to getting a licence, only now the process is more sophisticated. The provincial ministers, whose responsibilities form a part of the act of the licensing bodies, have never taken an interest in participating in the licensing process, and exerting their powers to keep the associations faithful to the interests of Canadians. This is the reason that licensing bodies have ignored the respective ministries and have done whatever was convenient for them, in the name of protecting public safety. It is well known that regulating the professions is a provincial responsibility and regulatory bodies approach their role by looking at academic credentials, usually finding fault with foreign credentials, asking candidates to sit additional examinations. Then they look for experience in general and find gaps. The federal government could easily eliminate many of these hurdles by exercising its right to sign international agreements with countries for reciprocal recognition of credentials. The European Union for example, does just that, in order to facilitate the movement of professionals among its 27 member states. So what are we waiting for? Once the recognition of credentials is in place, the regulatory bodies cannot invoke academic credentials issues and must apply their particular examination to all candidates equally, be they Canadian or foreign educated. These actions of the provincial regulatory bodies put a brake on Canadian economic revival. Canada immigration is looking for qualified people to come to Canada and making decisions based on the qualifications of potential immigrants. However, they fail to advise candidates of the provincial regulations of the professions. Therefore, we find physicians, engineers, nurses etc. coming to Canada and finding that they cannot exercise their profession. This is a major loss for both the individual and the country. There are many testimonies confirming just that, and I can personally attest to this with respect to my experience with the Professional Engineers Ontario. For many newcomers, rebuilding a career in Canada often means starting from scratch. Despite years of experience and training, they arrive to find their qualifications questioned and careers derailed by opaque licensing rules and persistent barriers to credential recognition. For decades, Canada has positioned itself as a global magnet for skilled immigrants, promising opportunity to those with education and experience. Over the past 25 years the country has shifted to a model where immigrants are required to study or work here as temporary residents before becoming eligible for permanent status. The aim has been to prioritize those with Canadian education and work experience in a bid to solve the “lack of Canadian experience” for which earlier immigrants were penalized. While some improvements have been made over the years — the federal government in March announced funding of up to $52 million toward foreign credential recognition. The question is who will administer this money? The regulatory bodies; the wolves in sheep’s clothing? This shift has not fixed problems such as the devaluation of foreign credentials, or the persistent wage gaps and underemployment faced by newcomers. The result is a system that still underutilizes skilled immigrants, leaving many in precarious work situations — despite critical labour shortages and an aging population — and it is estimated to cost Canada $50 billion in lost GDP each year. “Are we actually recognizing foreign credentials better? Not really,” said Rupa Banerjee, associate professor at Toronto Metropolitan University and Canada Research Chair of economic inclusion, employment and entrepreneurship of Canada’s immigrants. Rather than addressing barriers newcomers face; that prevent them from applying their existing qualifications, “we’ve circumvented this issue of foreign credentials as much as possible by really prioritizing people with Canadian education and experience.” There is no “convincing evidence that credential recognition has gotten demonstrably better” said Tricia Williams, director of research at the Future Skills Centre. “For every example of a regulated profession that’s gotten better, there’s others that have stayed the same.” More then a quarter-century ago, the Toronto Star raised many of the same questions, documenting the struggles and aspirations of newcomers like myself. I was interviewed in 1989 while trying to navigate Ontario’s professional engineer licensing system. And don’t forget: to be a Canadian engineer who can practice in every province and territory, you need 13 licences. Is this right? It was difficult to succeed in Canada despite many qualifications, but I enrolled in the Canadian Military Engineers, served the country in overseas missions, and ultimately I was elected as a Member of Parliament. By the way, engineers in the Parliament of Canada are like endangered species. It is time for Canada to seriously re-evaluate the role of self-regulating professional associations; to make them progressive and not a brake on the economic development of Canada. What do you think?

Modern Day Slavery: The Silence They Ignore

Modern Day Slavery: The Silence They Ignore By Dale Jodoin Slavery still exists. Today, it's called human trafficking and illegal immigration. While everyone argues over slavery from 400 years ago, they ignore the slavery right in front of them. This silence is not an accident. It’s deliberate, because modern slavery benefits people in power. Human trafficking is organized slavery. Migrants pay cartels to be smuggled across borders. When they arrive, they owe a debt. That debt is enforced through violence and fear. These people, men, women, and children are forced into labour, drug running, and prostitution. Speaking out means deportation or death. Businesses quietly profit. Undocumented workers are cheap, desperate, and replaceable. They can’t form unions. They don’t complain. Farms, factories, and service jobs all benefit. And politicians look the other way because it keeps industries fed and the economy humming. That’s the truth. Liberals say they defend the vulnerable. But they fight to protect systems that trap people in modern slavery. They call it compassion. They say it’s about opportunity. But how is it compassion to leave someone in a job they can’t quit, earning wages they can’t live on, under threat from violent traffickers? Cartels thrive on this system. Trafficking migrants is big business. Some are used to smuggle drugs. Others are forced into sex work. Debt keeps them trapped. Fear keeps them quiet. This isn’t just happening at the border, it's everywhere. In cities. In the suburbs. In towns where no one thinks to look. Sex trafficking is another form of slavery. Girls and women are taken from India, Asia, Central and South America. Many are drugged, raped, beaten, and sold repeatedly. They’re forced to work as prostitutes and are punished if they resist. Some never escape. Where’s the outrage? Where are the marches, the speeches, the social media campaigns? The same people who demand reparations for past injustices ignore the suffering of people enslaved today. They don’t want to confront the truth, especially when the criminals involved belong to politically protected groups. In Canada and the U.S., the justice system goes soft on minority offenders. Judges hand out light sentences for human trafficking, especially when the accused are Indigenous, Black, or part of another minority group. The idea is to avoid appearing racist. The result is a free pass for traffickers. Gangs of every background are involved: Black gangs, Indigenous gangs, Chinese mobs, and white supremacist groups. They all traffic humans. They all profit. White gangs are just as guilty, often working across state lines, moving drugs and women like cargo. Some are tied to biker gangs and nationalist militias that preach hate while running trafficking rings behind the scenes. Yet they’re rarely exposed because law enforcement fears being accused of profiling, or worse, targeting protected identities unfairly. And still, nothing changes. Speaking honestly gets you labeled racist. That fear keeps people silent. That silence protects criminals. In Canada, Indigenous girls go missing every year. The numbers are staggering. Many families are still waiting for answers. Some of these girls are assumed to have been trafficked, but we don’t truly know how many have fallen into modern slavery. The data is limited, the investigations are weak, and too many cases remain unsolved. The truth is buried under bureaucracy and silence. The UN claims to stand against human trafficking. Yet it often prioritizes politics over victims. Conferences are held. Speeches are made. But the criminals stay in business, and the slaves stay hidden. Liberals cry about the past while ignoring the present. They demand payment for slavery that ended generations ago but won’t confront the slavery happening now. Their outrage is selective. Their compassion is fake. And their silence makes them complicit. This is not about deportation or closed borders. It’s about the truth. People are being enslaved right now. Girls are being raped. Men are being forced to work under threat of violence. Children are vanishing. And the systems built to stop it are protecting the perpetrators. This is not a mystery. We know where it happens. We know who does it. But nothing changes. Because the truth is inconvenient. Because it challenges the narratives. Because it exposes the lies. Human trafficking is the slavery of today. It's in your city. Your neighbourhood. And maybe even your street. But no one talks about it because it doesn’t make anyone feel good. Because there’s no easy villain to blame. Because it might force people to face hard facts. The media avoids it. Politicians downplay it. Activists stay quiet. And victims keep suffering. That’s the cost of silence. That’s the price of fake compassion. We need honesty. We need courage. And we need to stop pretending this isn’t happening. Call it what it is: slavery. No more excuses. No more cover-ups. No more lies.