The Home Inspection

By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist Is a home inspection really necessary and if so, what should I expect from one? The home inspection plays a pivotal role in the purchase of any home, even new homes. A home inspection is important for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is to determine whether or not the home is sound. On a recent home inspection visit, the inspector sent out a pre inspection list just prior to the visit which listed the items that are checked during a home inspection as well as confirmation of who would be present during the inspection. All parties met at the house at the agreed time and were introduced to the inspector. The home inspector brought all of his own tools and set immediately about his routine. We were told that along with actual testing of certain things and the general looking and gauging, there would be pictures of everything along with explanations for the purchasers upon completion. The big-ticket items were checked of course, the roof, foundation, plumbing, wiring HVAC system. Other things that were also included were things like the windows, fencing, porch, patio, and garage. I was pleasantly surprised to see in the report things like loose handrail, noisy range hood. These were things that were evident when using or turning on. I felt it made the report more comprehensive. At the end of the inspection, the home inspector came into the kitchen where the family of the purchasers were, and went through everything he had noted, albeit briefly. The complete and comprehensive report would follow with photos of everything along with explanations. This was just a courtesy given that the family was there. At the end of his summary, he asked the family if anyone had any questions. The parents of both purchasers had questions. The Inspector took his time and answered in detail. The purchasers came away very happy with the inspection. The inspection did not uncover anything that was not readily seen to someone walking through the house. In this particular case, the inspection was not used to negotiate a better price due to needed repairs or anything like that which can be the case in some instances. Later that day the purchasers advised that they had received a digital file with numerous pictures and explanations of what they were looking at. The inspection in this case was just over two hours but some are three hours plus. This depends a great deal on whether or not the inspector can gain access to certain areas. While you are covered under the Terrion warranty in the province of Ontario for brand new builds, some home buyers still insist on a home inspection. A home inspection in Durham Region will run you anywhere from $400-600 but is well worth it for peace of mind, and is always recommended by any reputable Realtor. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

The End of the Second Trudeau Era

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The New Year 2025 has brought us interesting surprises. There was the announcement made on the 6th of January by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that he intends to hand in his resignation as the Liberal Party Leader. This was an interesting day, automatically making us think about what happened on the same day in 2020 in the United States, even though something different was in our minds. The announcement of the Prime Minister was made on the same day that the Parliament of Canada was prorogued until 24th of March. The resignation of the Prime Minister also initiated a leadership action in the Liberal Party of Canada in order to choose a leader capable of withstanding the pressure from the Conservative Party of Canada, the official opposition. By now, we have seen that many polls indicate a commanding two digit lead by the Conservative Party, which means that if an election were called today, they would win a majority of seats in parliament. The governing Liberals have few options looking forward. An election has to be called soon; either in the late spring or in the early fall at the latest, because all the major opposition parties in parliament are ready to topple the minority government. Looking at the candidates in the Liberal leadership race, though we are in the early stages, there is more and more talk about the entrance of Mark Carney into the leadership race. If Carney, former Chairman of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, is elected, he will present a real challenge to the leader of the Conservative Party, Pierre Poilievre. Let us be clear. The Justin Trudeau era began with his rebuilding the Liberal Party and, in the 2015 election, bringing it to power. His ascent to power was also made possible by the inability of the Conservative Party to clearly see what was going on in the Canadian electorate. With a tired Prime Minister Harper supported by an incompetent staff dealing with the reality of the moment, the success of the Liberal Party under the Leadership of Justin Trudeau was greatly facilitated. The potential leadership of Mark Carney would put a new element into play in the upcoming election. Suddenly the Trudeau factor will no longer count and the old slogan of “killing the gas tax” associated with him is unlikely to work anymore, having been battered to death. Add to this the fact that the same staff and advisors who lost the 2015 election for Stephen Harper still have a commanding influence; an interesting election looms on the horizon. It will be a Conservative Party loss rather than a Liberal win. Reflecting on the Justin Trudeau era which has just ended, we can make some interesting observations. In his early days as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau was "cool", with a majority of the youth electorate voting for him and admiring him. In the year that followed his majority sweep into power, he appeared in the pages of Vogue, on the cover of a Marvel comic book and other important media. He really created a movement in 2015 and he got a lot of young people engaged. However, the same people are asking for change today, and looking for a different leader, having lost confidence in him for not delivering his promise of a better life. Elections Canada data from the 2015 election showed that 57 per cent of voters aged 18 to 24 cast a ballot, an increase of 18.3 percentage points from the almost 39 per cent recorded in the 2011 election. Research conducted by Abacus Data following the 2015 vote suggested Liberals won the support of 45 per cent of young voters. Let’s face it, Canadians had a kind of parasocial relationship with Trudeau at the time. He had grown up in the public eye because of his father, former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, so people felt like they knew him. However, reality checked in, and the image started to fade. It all started in 2018 when Trudeau and his family took a much-ridiculed trip to India. They were photographed, over and over again, wearing clothes more appropriate for a wedding than a state visit. Then people started seeing it as: he's a bit of a phoney, and all of a sudden, some people were able to move from giving him the benefit of the doubt to realizing that instead of being authentic, he was actually manipulating them. Then, over time, the disconnect between promise and delivery broadened and that becomes a fundamental problem when you are dealing with a brand: the Trudeau brand. As a brand, Justin Trudeau was failing on a lot of promises because he was creating expectations that he was not fulfilling. He was dogged by a litany of scandals, from the SNC-Lavalin affair that saw two female cabinet ministers -- justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and health minister Jane Philpott -- resign, to the surfacing of old photos and video of Trudeau wearing black- and brown-face. Trudeau didn't live up to his feminist, culturally sensitive promise. Although Canadians re-elected Trudeau in 2019, he was knocked down to a minority government. The Liberals were unable to regain a majority in 2021. Therefore, Canada is in real turmoil on the brink of the crucial take over by President Trump’s Administration. It will be interesting to follow the quick succession of events that are to come. Let us hope that Canadian politicians will be able to navigate these dangerous high seas in the interest of preserving the very existence of Canada.

Outbreak of Respiratory Illness in China: What You Need to Know

By Dale Jodoin In recent weeks, hospitals across China have been overwhelmed with cases of severe respiratory illnesses, particularly among children. People are calling it the "White Lung" outbreak because of its impact on the lungs, leading to pneumonia, high fevers, and other symptoms that resemble respiratory infections. This has raised concerns, with many wondering if this is the start of another global health crisis like COVID-19. However, the good news is that health experts believe the current outbreak is caused by a known virus and not a new or unknown disease. This article aims to break down the situation, explain what's happening, and provide you with the facts in a simple and easy-to-understand way. It’s important to remember that I’m not a doctor—this information is publicly available on the internet, and I’m simply bringing it together to help you stay informed. The outbreak has caused a surge in hospital visits, especially among children under the age of 14. Many of them are experiencing cold-like symptoms that progress into more serious issues like bronchitis or pneumonia. Videos and reports from northern provinces in China show overcrowded hospitals, with parents anxiously waiting to get medical help for their children. Chinese health officials have confirmed that this outbreak is primarily due to a virus called human metapneumovirus (HMPV). This virus is not new; it has been known to medical science for years. HMPV often causes mild symptoms, similar to the common cold, but it can be more severe for young children, the elderly, and people with weak immune systems. Human metapneumovirus (HMPV) is part of a family of viruses that affect the respiratory system. It was first discovered in 2001, and it’s believed to have been circulating among humans for many decades. Most people get infected with HMPV at some point in their lives, often during childhood. For most healthy individuals, HMPV causes symptoms like: Cough Runny nose Sore throat Mild fever However, for vulnerable groups, it can lead to more serious conditions such as: Bronchitis (inflammation of the airways) Pneumonia (infection in the lungs) Severe breathing difficulties There is currently no vaccine or specific treatment for HMPV. Doctors usually focus on relieving symptoms, such as using fever reducers, staying hydrated, and resting. Although HMPV is not a new virus, the outbreak has caused concern for several reasons: High Number of Cases: The sheer volume of patients has overwhelmed hospitals, especially in northern parts of China. This has drawn comparisons to the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Severity Among Children: Many of the reported cases are in young children, who are more vulnerable to respiratory illnesses. The symptoms appear to escalate quickly, leading to complications like pneumonia. Timing: Winter is traditionally a season for respiratory infections, but the scale of this outbreak has raised alarms among public health experts. Preparedness: China has learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and is now monitoring cases of pneumonia more closely. They’ve even launched programs to track pneumonia of unknown origins to better handle potential new outbreaks in the future. The situation in China is serious for the people living there, but it is not yet a global health crisis. Here’s why: Known Cause: Unlike COVID-19 in its early days, this outbreak is caused by a virus that scientists already understand—HMPV. This means health experts know how it spreads and who is most at risk. Localized Impact: So far, the outbreak is concentrated in certain parts of China, and there’s no indication that it has spread widely to other countries. Seasonal Trends: It’s common to see a rise in respiratory infections during winter. Viruses like HMPV, influenza, and RSV (another respiratory virus) tend to spread more during cold months. However, it’s always good to be cautious. Respiratory viruses spread through droplets in the air, so simple precautions like washing your hands regularly, wearing a mask in crowded areas, and staying home when sick can help protect you and those around you. Chinese health authorities are taking this outbreak seriously. They have launched a pilot program to monitor cases of pneumonia of unknown origin. This program is designed to detect and respond to new diseases more quickly, preventing another situation like COVID-19 from catching the world off guard. Hospitals in the affected areas are also working hard to treat patients and manage the high demand for care. While the current focus is on treating symptoms, researchers are always looking for new ways to fight viruses like HMPV, including developing vaccines. There is always a chance that respiratory illnesses can spread to other parts of the world, especially with international travel. However, experts believe this outbreak is unlikely to grow into a global pandemic. That said, it’s important to remain vigilant. The lessons we learned during the COVID-19 pandemic—such as the importance of hygiene, vaccines, and staying informed—are still relevant today. If you live outside of China, the best thing you can do is keep an eye on local health updates. In the meantime, following these steps can help reduce your risk of getting sick: Practice Good Hygiene: Wash your hands frequently with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. Avoid Close Contact: Stay away from people who are sick, and avoid touching your face with unwashed hands. Stay Healthy: Get enough sleep, eat a balanced diet, and stay physically active to keep your immune system strong. What Does the Future Look Like? Experts predict that respiratory illnesses like HMPV will continue to spread during the winter months but will likely decrease as the weather warms up. Scientists are also studying viruses like HMPV more closely to develop vaccines or treatments in the future. Programs like the one China has launched to monitor pneumonia of unknown origin could help the world respond faster to similar outbreaks in the future. The current outbreak in China is a reminder that respiratory viruses are still a major health concern, especially during the winter months. While the situation is serious, there’s no need for panic. The outbreak is caused by a known virus, human metapneumovirus, and health experts are actively monitoring the situation. Remember to take simple precautions to protect yourself and others, especially during flu season. Stay informed, but don’t let fear take over. By working together and learning from past experiences, we can handle challenges like this more effectively. Disclaimer I am not a doctor, and this article is based on information that is freely available across the internet. My goal is to bring this information together to help you understand the situation better. For personalized medical advice, please consult a healthcare professional.

Job Seekers: Be Clear on Your “Secret Sauce”

Job Seekers: Be Clear on Your “Secret Sauce” By Nick Kossovan Most job seekers present themselves to employers as a jack of all trades, master of none, when they should be presenting a unique set of skills. You think you’re talented. Everyone you’re up against thinks they’re talented. What makes you special? When you apply for a job, possessing the necessary skills and qualifications is not enough. You need to find ways to differentiate yourself; otherwise, you will blend in with the other job seekers you're competing against. The key to differentiating yourself and rising above all the noise so you're seen and heard rather than ignored lies in your "secret sauce"—the unique skills, experiences, and attributes that make you one-of-a-kind. Thus, you become what most job seekers aren't: memorable. Asking yourself the following questions will help you define your secret sauce: 1. In my current or previous positions, what were my favourite tasks? For the most part, we enjoy activities we're good at (e.g., working with numbers, designing costumes, conducting research, organizing events, writing blogs) because our inherent strengths and aptitudes create a natural talent for the activity, thereby making it enjoyable since you’re not fighting who you are. List everything, work-related and non-work-related, you enjoy doing. 2. What feedback have I received from colleagues or supervisors regarding my work? Reflect on your career journey. Think of all the positive and negative feedback you received, whether in formal performance reviews or an offhand manner, regarding your work or something you did. "I enjoy sitting in on your presentations." "You have a knack for listening." "The way you motivate your team is impressive." 3. What problems have I successfully solved in previous positions? Every position exists to solve a problem. For instance, accountants are hired to monitor a company's incoming revenue and outgoing expenses and oversee its compliance with local tax laws. What problems have you solved for your employers? Increased website traffic? Decreased spending? Increased customer satisfaction? Decreased safety violations? Increased sales? (employers' favourite) 4. What unique experiences or backgrounds do I have that contribute to my skill set? A candidate who grew up in Quebec City will have a competitive edge being fluently bilingual over someone who simply attended French immersion in Calgary, Alberta. The same could be said for a candidate whose mother was a social worker, making them more attuned to the needs of others or their father, who was a pharmaceutical representative, thus exposing them to human dynamics that influence. Everyone has a unique story of how their place of birth and experiences, especially first experiences, developed their strengths and 'passion for.' Explaining to an employer that your enjoyment of providing customer service that's a competitive advantage comes from having spent your weekends and summers working the front desk at your family's 85-room hotel in Estevan, Saskatchewan, has much more impact than simply saying, "I like helping people." 5. What skills have I gained through hobbies or volunteer work? I once hired a call centre agent who volunteered at a local suicide prevention hotline for several years. A candidate who coached a little league baseball team turned out to be one of the best first-time manager I ever hired. Don't ignore the skills and experience you've acquired outside your employment or education. Skills, experience, and knowledge aren't just acquired at work or school. The skills and experience you gain from volunteering, starting/running a business, being a parent, playing in a sports league, or serving on your condo board can be valuable to employers. If the above questions don't solicit as many skills as you'd like, seek the opinions of family members, friends, and colleagues. Ask them what they think your key strengths are. Their insights may surprise you. Once you've identified your hard and soft skills—your soft skills (e.g., communication, critical thinking, time management) are the most important to employers—you need to communicate your unique skills as selling points. Merely listing your "skills" and "qualifications" doesn't distinguish you from other applicants. You must describe who you are and what you offer in a straightforward, memorable narrative conveying your unique value proposition. · Not memorable: "I speak French." · Memorable: "I was born in Quebec City. French is my mother tongue." Additionally, frame your skills and qualifications in terms of how they can benefit an employer. · No value add: "I have strong analytical skills." · Value add: "During my seven years as a financial analyst at Wayne Enterprises, I developed above-average analytical skills that enabled the company to take advantage of several initial public offerings that turned out to be quite lucrative. One recommended buy resulted in a $7.5 million gain within less than a year." Based on my experience, most candidates fail to emphasize their uniqueness; hence, they don't stick in my head. Given the number of candidates I've interviewed throughout my career, one would think I'd have heard many inspiring, funny, entertaining, and sad career and life stories. Unfortunately, that's not the case. Job seekers need to work on being mentally sticky. In a competitive job market filled with qualified candidates, articulating your secret sauce will ultimately set you apart. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Ward 2 oshawa the forgotten people…

ward 2 oshawa the forgotten people... By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States For those that read my column on a regular basis. will know that I am a believer in the democratic process when it comes to electing government officials. In the same breath. You, also know where I stand with the quality of the candidates that we elect in office. The quality of living in the City of Oshawa keeps getting worst. Taxes keep going up. One would have thought that at the 2022 municipal election the electorate would have voted for change. Almost a reset button on Oshawa’s quality of life. NO - instead the electorate kept all the councillor and the incumbent Mayor and only changed one. I still can’t believe the results and the outcome. To vote back in a Mayor that has turned downtown Oshawa into Durham’s capital for the homeless, drug use, drug trade and prostitution. I am beyond words. Only to strengthen my position on how the electorate votes. Take for example the only change in the municipal roster. Ward 2, City Councillor, Jim Lee. At first I was excited. I thought finally someone with some credentials and a some what proven work history. I had hope for the ward with an under used airport. With a ward that has no representation. At the region, Regional and City councillor Tito-Dante Marimpietri has had numerous terms as the ward 2 rep. How has the ward benefitted? Anyone’s guess. As for Lee. He has shown respect and visited my office once since elected. I appreciated that.... as Tito in his God knows how many terms... maybe visited his local city newspaper once or twice out of the many years he has been elected. Lee, in my opinion. Has become institutionalized. The do nothing and say even less, gets you elected time and time again appears. Lee instead of taking this golden opportunity to make a name for himself. He has opted to cushion his pension and play by the municipal coalitions rules. Say nothing, support what the coalition supports and support corporate prejudice and political vindication against anyone that challenges the status quo at the City of Oshawa offices. If I am wrong. I will be the first to apologize. One question. What has Lee done for ward 2 in his half term. The City position on doing business with the 30 serving newspaper is ignored due to political vendetta. They claim they support local small businesses. We are living proof of their bias, prejudice and lack of support for local small businesses. This is in part why there are so many vacancies in our core. NO SUPPORT. The City of Oshawa is not inclusive but selective.

NEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ON ITS WAY -MERCHANTS CONCERNED OVER LOSS OF PARKING-

NEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ON ITS WAY -MERCHANTS CONCERNED OVER LOSS OF PARKING- By Dean Hickey THE PRINCIPLES WHICH GUIDE the approval of any new development within the city’s downtown core will, by necessity, demand a parallel review of the existing parking capacity upon which so many businesses and residents rely. With the future of Lot 4 now being debated by council, many among the various property owners, merchants, and those who frequent the area will doubtless be concerned as to the potential reduction in the number of available spots. The Economic and Development Services committee decided in early November to declare the surface parking lot at the north side of Athol Street, between Simcoe and Centre Streets, as ‘surplus’ in an effort to engage with those seeking to develop the property into something far beyond its current use. Due to the nature of the process which surrounds such negotiations and decision making, most of what has so-far been discussed has taken place in closed session, and the details have yet to be disclosed. It is known, however, that staff did recommend the approval of a specific proposal having been brought forward as a result of a targeted RFP (Request for Proposals) process, whereby consideration was given to a few select proponents. Committee members took a publicly recorded vote on the matter and, oddly enough, those who were opposed to the staff recommendation were Ward 4 councillors Rick Kerr and Derek Giberson. Both men represent the area that encompasses the downtown, and they are known as having competing visions for the city. Those differences will undoubtedly play a role in their responses to a recent petition that has been submitted to city hall on the issue of parking and the losses that may occur. A group of downtown merchants have signed the petition that reads as follows: “We hereby write, sign, and validate this document as a request…with regards to the acceptance of such project wherein consideration is given to the development of a Parking Lot in the area of Lot 4 in downtown Oshawa. The shortage of parking is NEGATIVELY affecting businesses and is resulting in loss of customers and loss of business revenue. Countless customers have expressed their frustration with the lack of parking, and after circling the downtown area and wasting over fifteen minutes, they give up and go somewhere else. If you want to see businesses grow and thrive in downtown Oshawa, you MUST provide parking. We NEED this parking lot to be built to accommodate customers driving from outside of the area and to generate more productivity in the neighbourhood and provide the potential of expansion for future projects. This is a basic necessity.” One property owner I spoke with, on condition of anonymity for the sake of his tenants, said “Anyone can see we have parking issues downtown. The City doesn’t have the money to do anything about it, so they’re relying on developers.” He went on to add, “Factor in the massive residential developments that are coming downtown and we are severely affected.” He expressed a high level of frustration over the City’s consultation process, telling me it’s quite simply insufficient. “They need better communications people, because we have a manager at city hall who is responsible for downtown business development, and nobody seems to know who she is or what she does.” That’s unfortunate, because the effects of an ever-shrinking supply of parking are being felt directly by those who are trying to make a living in the city’s core, and they need proper representation at the staff level. Supporting a blanket conversion of Lot 4 into other uses may be a recipe for advanced economic decline, if one also takes into account the proposal from the Provincial government for dedicated rapid bus lanes that will consume no less than 125 parking spaces when complete. If that wasn’t bad enough, consider the effect the widening of sidewalks along the north side of King Street has had on the number of spaces available, and the losses continue to mount. This is where the difference in vision between the two Ward 4 councillors may be considered. I was advised by one downtown merchant of a recent survey undertaken by councillor Kerr in an apparent effort to gauge just how troubling the whole parking issue has become. “Rick Kerr is all over this parking thing, and it’s like he’s on a mission” she told me as we discussed her most pressing concerns. Numerous factors have come together in recent years, causing a negative effect on her business. They include open drug use among the homeless, an increase in crime, and of course the slow but steady erosion of accessible parking for customers she says are uncomfortable walking any great distance, particularly as the daylight hours diminish at this time of year. I reached out to councillor Kerr for comment, and he suggested that “Our downtown businesses are stifled now by a lack of parking, for both customers and employees, and I can give you at least three examples. The first is the CIBC building, which has lots of available opportunities for future tenants, however they require reliable, available parking in order to successfully market their office space. Another example is the number of empty store-fronts where businesses have closed or relocated to other areas they see as more accessible. The third component is the lack of development potential for small-footprint buildings that cannot be converted or redeveloped due to their lack of anticipated parking requirements.” While I did not reach out directly to councillor Giberson, his public comments on the issue of mobility within cities, and downtowns in general, has been outwardly focused on the promotion of alternate forms of transportation. In one of his social media posts he offers the following, “It's great to see what Ottawa has been doing in substantially increasing their bike lanes, and they are proof that with time (decade+) and focused will (political, planning & engineering depts, community organizing, financial commitment), you can build up that network and make active transportation and public transportation…a viable alternative to car-centric mobility…” For many elected officials and urban planners, it has become fashionable to cast retailers and others who decry the absence of parking as being somehow biased in their perceptions and without proper appreciation for aspects such as bike lanes, which have certainly been in the news recently. Meanwhile, in the shops and offices downtown, those at ground zero can see for themselves exactly what the absence of a meaningful strategic parking initiative has cost them, and they’re tired of excuses from a bureaucratic and political establishment that lacks the necessary vision.

Canada –an independent nation

Canada –an independent nation by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East With the world in turmoil, Canada embroiled in political fights between the two parties which have traditionally ruled it, and our southern neighbor considering the imposition of a 25% tax on products from Canada under the new Trump administration, it is time to remember a little of our history and learn from our past leaders. Largely unknown and unrecognised by the vast majority of Canadians, the Statute of Westminster Day, celebrated on December 11th is nonetheless an extremelyimportant day in Canada’s history as a nation. The self-governing colonies of the British Empire, which included Canada, were known as the Dominions. Despite their right for self-government, the British parliament had considerable legislative authority over the Dominions. The situation was changed by the Statute of Westminster in 1931, which increased the sovereignty of the Dominions, giving them legal autonomy and making them essentially sovereign nations in their own right. However, at Canada’s request, the British parliament retained the power to amend the constitution of Canada for five more decades after the enactment of the Statute. The anniversary of the Statute of Westminster is celebrated in Canada every year, but it is not a public holiday, which means that government offices, educational establishments, banks, and businesses remain open unless December 11 falls on a weekend. To celebrate the day, the national flag of Canada and the Royal Union Flag, commonly referred to as the Union Jack, are flown side by side on federal buildings and establishments from sunrise to sunset. Please observe that this is the case in your community. In remembering the steps involved in the formation of the Canada of today, July 1, 1867, the day the Confederation of Canada came into being is generally considered the founding date of the country. However, at that rime the country still wasn’t an entirely “autonomous” nation. That came decades later, on December 11, 1931 with the passing of the Statute of Westminster. The British law clarified that Canada and other Commonwealth countries have full legal freedom except in areas where those nations chose to remain subordinate to Britain. That Statute included the Dominion of Canada, the colony of Newfoundland (which would join Canada in 1949), the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State. Having garnered great respect internationally and a strong sense of Canada’s unique nationality as a result of the First World War, Canada signed the Treaty of Versailles ending that war as a separate nation from Britain, though this was not quite the case. During the following years, the government of Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie-King sought the full rights of a sovereign country in creation of laws and foreign policy. The process had begun in the 1920’s when Canada signed a fishing treaty with the U.S without British participation, established an embassy in Washington, and decided not to assist a British occupation force in Turkey without the approval of Canada’s Parliament. However, the seeds for autonomy were sown in 1926 at the Imperial Conference when Britain’s foreign minister, Lord Balfour proposed that the Dominions be granted legislative autonomy. In 1929, Canada’s head of the Department of External Affairs, O.D. Skelton, attended the Conference on the Operation of Dominion Legislation in London. Here the various resolutions proposed in 1926 were firmed up. In 1930 the various governments submitted terms of the future Statute to their Parliaments. Then on the date of December 11, 1931, the Statute was passed into law. While the Dominions accepted all resolutions, only Canada couldn’t determine a process to amend the Constitution. Thus, power to amend Canada’s Constitution remained under British authority until 1982 with the passing of Canada’s Constitution Act. In conclusion, the anniversary of the Statute of Westminster is a key date that celebrates Canada’s legal independence from Britain. This day is important because it marks Canada’s legislative autonomy, allowing it to make its own laws without British approval. The Statute of Westminster was a pivotal step in Canada’s journey towards becoming a fully sovereign nation. Celebrations on this day highlight Canada’s identity and achievements. The statute is celebrated because it acknowledges the hard work and determination of Canadian leaders who fought for the country’s independence. It also serves as a reminder of Canada’s evolution into a nation that stands on its own while still being part of the Commonwealth. Our current leaders need to remember the work of their forefathers who guided Canada’s evolution to becoming an independent nation, They need to learn from our history, and possibly be inspired by the achievements of their predecessors. Instead of bickering in their ivory towers in Ottawa, our leaders should concentrate on developing new and inspiring objectives for Canada as a nation, working to evolve Canada into a leading nation of the world. What do you think?

Stop Asking Your Interviewer Cliché Questions

By Nick Kossovan Most job search advice is cookie-cutter. The advice you're following is almost certainly the same advice other job seekers follow, making you just another candidate following the same script. In today's hyper-competitive job market, standing out is critical, a challenge most job seekers struggle with. Instead of relying on generic questions recommended by self-proclaimed career coaches, which often lead to a forgettable interview, ask unique, thought-provoking questions that'll spark engaging conversations and leave a lasting impression. English philosopher Francis Bacon once said, "A prudent question is one half of wisdom." The questions you ask convey the following: · Your level of interest in the company and the role. · Contributing to your employer's success is essential. · You desire a cultural fit. Here are the top four questions experts recommend candidates ask; hence, they've become cliché questions you should avoid asking: · "What are the key responsibilities of this position?" Most likely, the job description answers this question. Therefore, asking this question indicates you didn't read the job description. If you require clarification, ask, "How many outbound calls will I be required to make daily?" "What will be my monthly revenue target?" · "What does a typical day look like?" Although it's important to understand day-to-day expectations, this question tends to elicit vague responses and rarely leads to a deeper conversation. Don't focus on what your day will look like; instead, focus on being clear on the results you need to deliver. Nobody I know has ever been fired for not following a "typical day." However, I know several people who were fired for failing to meet expectations. Before accepting a job offer, ensure you're capable of meeting the employer's expectations. · "How would you describe the company culture?" Asking this question screams, "I read somewhere to ask this question." There are much better ways to research a company's culture, such as speaking to current and former employees, reading online reviews and news articles. Furthermore, since your interviewer works for the company, they're presumably comfortable with the culture. Do you expect your interviewer to give you the brutal truth? "Be careful of Craig; get on his bad side, and he'll make your life miserable." "Bob is close to retirement. I give him lots of slack, which the rest of the team needs to pick up." Truism: No matter how much due diligence you do, only when you start working for the employer will you experience and, therefore, know their culture firsthand. · "What opportunities are there for professional development?" When asked this question, I immediately think the candidate cares more about gaining than contributing, a showstopper. Managing your career is your responsibility, not your employer's. Cliché questions don't impress hiring managers, nor will they differentiate you from your competition. To transform your interaction with your interviewer from a Q&A session into a dynamic discussion, ask unique, insightful questions. Here are my four go-to questions—I have many more—to accomplish this: · "Describe your management style. How will you manage me?" This question gives your interviewer the opportunity to talk about themselves, which we all love doing. As well, being in sync with my boss is extremely important to me. The management style of who'll be my boss is a determining factor in whether or not I'll accept the job. · "What is the one thing I should never do that'll piss you off and possibly damage our working relationship beyond repair?" This question also allows me to determine whether I and my to-be boss would be in sync. Sometimes I ask, "What are your pet peeves?" · "When I join the team, what would be the most important contribution you'd want to see from me in the first six months?" Setting myself up for failure is the last thing I want. As I mentioned, focus on the results you need to produce and timelines. How realistic are the expectations? It's never about the question; it's about what you want to know. It's important to know whether you'll be able to meet or even exceed your new boss's expectations. · "If I wanted to sell you on an idea or suggestion, what do you need to know?" Years ago, a candidate asked me this question. I was impressed he wasn't looking just to put in time; he was looking for how he could be a contributing employee. Every time I ask this question, it leads to an in-depth discussion. Other questions I've asked: · "What keeps you up at night?" · "If you were to leave this company, who would follow?" · "How do you handle an employee making a mistake?" · "If you were to give a Ted Talk, what topic would you talk about?" · "What are three highly valued skills at [company] that I should master to advance?" · "What are the informal expectations of the role?" · "What is one misconception people have about you [or the company]?" Your questions reveal a great deal about your motivations, drive to make a meaningful impact on the business, and a chance to morph the questioning into a conversation. Cliché questions don't lead to meaningful discussions, whereas unique, thought-provoking questions do and, in turn, make you memorable. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

The Right Choice

By Joe Ingino B.A. Psychology Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States It is about time that the people win one. It is no secret that North American style politics is in severe need of repair. No matter where you look. Corruption, collusion prevail. Not to mention wealth. This past week we witness the pushing of a reset button by the people through what we deem to be a democratic process. Democracy much like the many other political systems are in danger of extinction and or severe change. With the recent win by Donald Trump. The world is watching to see him clean out the old and bring in the new. A new system that will punish those that take part in the rat race and reward those that are intellectually capable to work truly in the best interest of those that elected them to office. Kamala, was a poster child for all that is wrong in politics. A person that would tell you anything you wanted to hear. She would promise the world and deliver excuses. The question that will linger in her mind for years to come. ‘I SHOULD HAVE TOLD THEM MY PLAN’. Something that until today no one knows what it was.... all we know is that she wanted to be elected to the highest office on a promise of turning some fictional page. She promised to do what she failed to for the past four years. She vowed to make changes after she got in and failed to do anything while she was in office. Well, the people have spoken and they have turned a page in the right direction. What are we to expect. As promised by Trump. World peace will be re-instated. No more Middle East conflicts. No more Ukraine war. Finally, peace will come to reign in all foreign conflict. Including the mess along the South Pacific rim. A silent cancer that has been beaten back time and time... Alone they are harmless. In unity they may pose a serious threat. The U.S. will soon boom economically. As always Canada will follow. Our Canadian dollar will once again start climbing up. Gas prices will start coming down. Food prices will come down and immigration put under control. No more open taps on immigration. No more wasting taxpayers dollars to subsidize refugees. Canada will soon go through similar political transformation. It is the natural law of Canadian politics. We go red for a while. Then blue and eventually back to red.... What North America needs is a new political system. Hopefully, Trump this time around will rise with the system to implement for generations to come. It is like that saying goes. Time will tell. Let’s hope Trump does not waste this golden opportunity for positive change.

Canada's Hidden Railway Crisis: The Rising Threat of Trespassing Accidents

By Dale Jodoin In recent years, Canada's railways have been at the center of a growing safety crisis, one that affects the lives of hundreds and remains severely underreported. Trespassing accidents—where individuals cross or walk along train tracks—have become a significant and deadly issue, yet they rarely make headlines. The statistics are alarming: in 2023 alone, 53 people lost their lives due to trespassing accidents on Canada's rail lines. This is not just a freak occurrence but part of an ongoing trend that demands urgent attention. The Growing Danger on the Tracks The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) recorded 913 rail accidents in 2023, slightly lower than the previous year but still troublingly high. Out of those incidents, 67 were fatal, with the majority caused by trespassing accidents. Trespassing now accounts for an overwhelming 79% of all rail fatalities, making it the number one cause of death on Canada's railways( The Safety Magazine These accidents don't just happen in isolated areas; they occur in communities across the country. Many victims are young people, homeless individuals, or those who may be unaware of the dangers of walking on or near tracks. The increasing population density in urban areas has also made it easier for individuals to access railway lines, whether for shortcuts or as part of their daily commute. A Persistent Problem While the overall number of railway accidents has slightly decreased, the death toll from trespassing accidents continues to rise. Experts have pointed out that one reason for this is a lack of public awareness about the severe risks of walking along train tracks. Many people see tracks as convenient shortcuts, unaware that trains often approach more quickly than they realize and cannot stop in time to avoid a collision. Trespassing fatalities have remained consistently high over the past five years. In 2022, 51 people were killed in trespassing accidents, and this number increased to 53 in 2023. The trend shows no signs of slowing down, despite efforts by railway companies and safety organizations to curb these incidents The Safety Magazine Understanding the Scale To truly understand the magnitude of the problem, it’s important to break down the statistics. In 2023, out of 913 total rail accidents, 87 involved dangerous goods such as chemicals, fuel, or other hazardous materials, but it’s trespassing that has captured the grim spotlight. On average, nearly five people die every month from trespassing accidents alone. Compare this to the 13 fatalities caused by crossing accidents (where vehicles or pedestrians attempt to cross the tracks at designated points), and it becomes clear that trespassing is far more dangerous. The Safety Magazine The loss of life is not just a statistic. These are real people, often from vulnerable communities, whose deaths have a ripple effect on their families, friends, and the broader community. Trespassing accidents leave behind shattered lives, and the emotional toll on train operators and first responders who witness these tragedies is immense. Why Is This Happening? There are several reasons for the rising number of trespassing fatalities. First, Canada's railway system spans vast areas, often running through densely populated cities and small, rural communities alike. Many people see train tracks as convenient shortcuts to get from one place to another, especially in areas where infrastructure like bridges or designated crossings is lacking. In some cases, people are unaware that they are even trespassing on private property. Homelessness has also been cited as a contributing factor. In urban areas, individuals without shelter often seek refuge near train tracks or use them as walking paths, unaware of the danger. Moreover, train speeds can vary, and depending on the weather conditions, trains can be especially quiet, making it hard for people to hear them approaching. Another major factor is insufficient fencing and barriers around railway tracks. While some urban areas have installed protective fences, many rural areas have little to no physical barriers to keep people from accessing the tracks. In regions where there are no fences or signs, people are more likely to wander onto the tracks without realizing the danger. What's Being Done to Stop This? Railway companies and organizations have taken steps to improve safety and raise awareness. Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) and Canadian National Railway (CN) have launched public safety campaigns to educate people about the risks of trespassing on railway tracks. These campaigns include advertisements, social media outreach, and partnerships with schools and community organizations. However, despite these efforts, the number of fatalities continues to rise. Operation Lifesaver, a national nonprofit dedicated to rail safety, has also worked to address this issue. They’ve launched the "Look, Listen, Live" campaign, which aims to teach Canadians the importance of being aware around train tracks and crossings. The campaign encourages people to "always expect a train" and highlights the irreversible consequences of not following railway safety rules. The TSB has also suggested that more needs to be done to prevent trespassing accidents, including better fencing, signage, and public awareness campaigns in high-risk areas. The Safety Magazine However, these measures come with a cost, and railway companies have been slow to implement them nationwide. In rural and remote areas, the lack of infrastructure and resources makes it difficult to protect the tracks fully. What Needs to Happen Next? The solution to this crisis is multifaceted. First and foremost, there needs to be a stronger commitment to public education. Schools and local governments must be more involved in spreading awareness about railway safety, especially in communities that are near train tracks. Parents should teach their children the dangers of playing near tracks, and adults need to be more conscious of the risks of trespassing. There also needs to be more investment in physical barriers like fences and warning signs in both urban and rural areas. Railway companies, local governments, and national safety organizations must work together to identify high-risk areas and take swift action to secure them. Finally, enforcement of trespassing laws needs to be strengthened. In many cases, trespassing on railway tracks is treated as a minor offense, but the consequences can be fatal. Increased patrols and fines may help deter people from walking on or near tracks. Canada's trespassing problem on its railway tracks is a deadly issue that deserves more attention. With 53 people killed in 2023, the dangers of walking along train tracks are clear. While efforts are being made to reduce these accidents, much more needs to be done to protect the public. By investing in education, infrastructure, and enforcement, Canada can work to prevent these senseless tragedies and save lives. The time to act is now.

The True Bullies of Pickering: How the Mayor and Council are Abusing Power, Silencing Dissent, and Wasting Your Tax Dollars

By Lisa Robinson For over a year now, the mayor and fellow councillor’s of Pickering have relentlessly attacked me—not because I’m failing the people who elected me, but because I refuse to bow down to their political games and pander to their special interest groups. I’ve been sanctioned, stripped of my pay yet again for daring to speak up for the people of Pickering, for exercising my right to free expression under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This latest sanction—another three months without pay—marks a total of six months of financial punishment. This isn’t about accountability; it’s about intimidation. They want me to fall in line, but I refuse. The truth is, they’ve weaponized the Integrity Commissioner as their personal attack dog, pushing a one-sided narrative designed to discredit me. They twist my words, manipulate my actions, and suppress the voices of my constituents. Let me be absolutely clear: There was no legitimate investigation. This is a political hit job—a calculated attempt to silence me, to paint me as the problem, when the real bullies are sitting in council chambers. Think about it: if I didn’t care, don’t you think I’d just shut up and fall in line? Why would I keep working for free while they drag my name through the mud? I have nothing to gain from this fight, but they have everything to lose. I’m standing up for common sense for common people, while they cling to power and their self-serving interests, while catering to developers and special interest groups. The mayor himself has abused his power, using city staff on your dime—paid by Pickering’s taxpayers—to craft his 75 page witch hunt of manufactured complaints against me. And his bias is no longer just behind closed doors. On September 3, he openly stated he is biased towards me and that he doesn’t want to hear anything I have to say. What does that tell you? He is not just dismissing me—he’s also dismissing every voter who believes I have the right to be heard on their behalf. While they’re busy orchestrating this smear campaign, I’m out there doing the job I was elected to do. The day after they voted to strip me of my pay, I was the only member of council to show up at the “Pickering Forward” meeting, an important forum to hear what the people had to say about our city’s future. And where were the rest of them? They didn’t show because they don’t care about what you, the voters, have to say, and it wasn’t a photo opportunity. They’re more interested in silencing dissent and consolidating power than in listening to the people. What kind of leadership sanctions a single mother’s pay, knowing full well I have bills to pay, a mortgage to cover, and a family to support? They don’t care. Just imagine someone taking away your ability to pay for the roof over your head or to feed your family because they don’t like what you have to say. They would rather see me suffer, hoping to break me down so I’ll finally cave to their demands. This is not just an abuse of power; it’s vindictive harassment. They are unfit to lead—not just for their bullying and intimidation, but for their brazen attempt to lobby the Provincial government to change the Municipal Act. They want the power to remove elected officials who disagree with them—an assault on democracy. Worse still, they want to ensure that anyone they oust is banned from running in future elections, silencing the people’s choice even further. Their actions are not just authoritarian; they’re downright dangerous. They don’t want a council of diverse voices; they want an echo chamber where only their views reign supreme. Each of their characters should be seriously questioned, not just for what they’re doing to me, but for what they’re doing to you—the people of Pickering. The draconian measures they are putting in place is to stifle public input and are designed to rig future elections, to ensure only those who agree with their power-hungry agenda get a seat at the table. They don’t care about democracy or free speech—they care about control. And let’s not forget the staggering misuse of taxpayer dollars in this vendetta. Instead of returning my rightful salary—just $15,000+ for three months of lost pay—they’ve decided to burn up to $200,000 of your money fighting me in a judicial review. $200,000 of your hard-earned tax dollars that could be better spent on the community is being flushed down the drain to prop up their lies. And if you think it stops there, think again. When I take them to court again for another judicial review, I bet they’ll be more than willing to waste another $200,000, bringing the total to a disgraceful $400,000 of your hard earned tax payers money just to silence one voice. Do they care? Of course not—it’s not their money. It’s yours. Through all of this, I have never stopped fighting for the people of Pickering. I show up. I listen. I push back against corruption and collusion, even when they come after me with everything they’ve got. The mayor and his council have shown that they are not fit to serve—they are power-hungry, vindictive, and have zero regard for the voices of the people. And let me be clear, this isn’t just happening in Pickering – it’s happening in Municipalities across the Country. So it needs to stop immediately. Personally, I won’t back down. I will continue to stand with you—because that’s what real leadership looks like. Even when they try to silence me, I will not be bullied. The people of Pickering deserve better, and I will fight to give them the representation they elected me for. It’s time to hold these bullies accountable.

What exactly is a Renoviction?

By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist What exactly is a Renoviction? A renoviction is a process that a landlord undertakes to evict a tenant from their unit by telling them that there needs to be work completed in the unit or on the property. Renovictions are perfectly legal in the province of Ontario, however they need to be carried out in the proper manor. This is a process that is governed by the Landlord and Tenant board. There are certain forms and procedures that must be followed. If these procedures are not followed to the letter, they are considered bad faith renovictions and that is illegal in Ontario. Renovictions can be carried out to ensure the viability and stability of older buildings. Sometimes renovictions need to be carried out to update buildings and bring in new services. If something catastrophic has happened in a building, there may be a period of time that is required for major repairs. An N13 notice is what needs to be given to the tenant to start the procedure. This notice is a notice to end tenancy because the landlord wants to demolish the rental unit, repair it, or convert it into another use. It is very important for tenants to realize and understand that they have the legal right to return to their unit once the renovations are complete, at the same rental rate that they paid prior to the renovation. It is so important for tenants to know and exercise their rights in this situation. There are steps that need to be taken and if the tenant does not take them, they could be out in the cold. Tenants have what is known as the first right of refusal. In order to reoccupy the unit when renovations are complete, the tenant must notify the landlord in writing that it is their intention to move back in when the unit is ready for occupancy and provide the landlord with an up-to-date mailing address. Units that are being demolished do not offer the option of returning. If the tenant decides not to reoccupy the unit, they are entitled to compensation from the landlord. Three months’ rent if they live in a complex with more than five units, and one months’ rent for buildings with less than five units, or the landlord can offer the tenant another acceptable unit. With the explosion of the housing market in the last few years, bad faith renovictions have become a real problem in Ontario and an absolute nightmare for some tenants. Some unscrupulous landlords try to evict tenants by saying they need to perform renovations for various reasons and need the tenant to vacate. Often after vacating the unit, it would come back on the rental market, updated, at a much higher rent than the previous tenant was paying. This practice prompted The City of Hamilton to pass the province’s first and only anti-renoviction Bylaw that would require a landlord that wants to renovict a tenant to obtain a license from the city ($715) and provide proof from an engineer that the property must be vacated in order to perform the renovations. Enforcement of this Bylaw starts in January of 2025. Here are a few indicators that may point to an upcoming renoviction. A change in ownership can often signal that a renoviction may be on the way. If your neighbourhood has changed, you notice more condos going up, store fronts changing to new businesses. Often your rent is much lower than market rents due to the fact that you’ve lived there for a long time. Sometimes, a landlord will simply ask a tenant to voluntarily pay more rent. If the tenant refuses to pay an increase, the landlord will take measures to get more money for the unit. If your landlord has informed you that you need to leave your home in order for him to perform renovations, call the Landlord and Tenant Board to get a copy of what your rights are in this situation. Always arm yourself with the facts in order to make an informed decision. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

ANSWERS TO WHY ?

ANSWERS TO WHY ? WHY, WAS THE QUESTION - ARE THESE THE ANSWERS ? 1. Could it be that we the people who elect these others into power have neglected our duty. We voted and then fail to follow what they do until it’s too late. Then we vote them back in. 2-5. Could it be that the happening across many municipalities of the reducing of car lanes, the creating of bus lanes which are unused the better part of the day, the increase of bike lanes, the set up of these rental stations for bike and scooters are part of the planned 15 minute cities also known as smart cities. 6. Babies are born with blank brains ready to learn. Babies first learn pain by means of hunger & gas. Discomfort is learned by wet and dirty diapers. Babies learn comfort and love by being fed, burped, cleaned, hugged, and comforting voices. As babies grow they absorb and copy everything, they investigate everything around them and we as parents watch over them, encouraging their learning while protecting them from potential dangers. 7. We are careful to only provide our children topics and objects that are age appropriate to learning. e.g. we would not give and expect a toddler to safely balance and ride a bicycle 8. Teaching a child, suggesting to that child that he or she is in the wrong body simply because of things they like, or like to do, is nothing more than manipulation and should be considered child abuse. Remember these are children, their young brains have not yet developed fully and they tend to believe what they are told as these children have not yet learned to question why or what they are being told. It’s no wonder there is a rise in children and teens are having mental problems and suicide attempts. 9. It is not okay to provide children puberty blockers and then when a teenager, mutilate that child? A teenager is still a child in the eyes of the law till the age of majority. When a child, who’s young brain has not fully developed, is encouraged and manipulated by teachers, doctors and other adults into making a life adulterating decision that could also mean a lifetime of medications, then those teachers, doctors etc should be criminally charged with bodily harm and indignity to an underage living person. 10. Governments did not give birth to our children. The government says, we the parents are responsible for our children until they reach adulthood. We, the parents, pay the government to educate our children, reading, writing, arithmetic, history, geography and science, NEVER did we the parents, give the government the right to confuse our children about their gender, about their sex or the how to of various sexual activities. 11. People are either a male (boy, man, father, brother, he, him) or a female (girl, woman, lady, mother, sister, she, her). How a person feels internally is not to be confused with what they were born. 12. Death by drug overdoses has increased since so called “safe drug sites” were provided. What we should be providing is help to overcome addiction. 13. Common sense, we, or most of us, have it, common sense and need to get back to using it instead of standing by and letting these things happen. 14. When the opposition doesn’t have answers to your questions and can’t have a civil conversation with you they attack you as being racist, homophobic, transphobic etc. 15. When the your opposition doesn’t have an answer to your question they label it as hate? 16. Electricity is not sole salvation of this world, ask anyone who has been in a two or more day blackout and having no other means then electricity for cooking, heating, communicating & transportation 17.– 20. We seem to have lost our ability of critical thinking and have been conditioned to believe the media and government tells us the truth. When if fact if we had paid attention we would know that the world is and has been slowly governed by non-elected parties who have no part in Canada, the UN (united nations) the WHO (world health organizations) and the WEF (world economic forum) who want to control us. Check out Bill C-63, C-293 for starters. Remember, Silence Solves Nothing, you’re not alone, speak up and others will too. Stand Up, Speak Up For Your Rights, Keep Democracy Alive

SUPER MAYOR POWER

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - An open plea to Mr. Ford. Dear Sir, please consider pulling the “Strong Mayor Powers”, from all these weak Mayors. I say this because, Strong Mayor Powers to some of these mayors is like giving a loaded gun to a child. In my opinion of 28 years serving Durham. I have seen all kinds of administrations come and go. From real good ones to what we have today. It appears that there is a viral type of attitude across the Region. One that works hard to exclude tax payers from the process. Municipal government traditionally worked due to the fact that those elected had something positive to contribute and had primary interest in the communities they lived. Well, don’t get me wrong. I do not blame those elected as they are just playing along. I blame society and the never ending population growth. With such, you have to prepare for change. For significant change. What I mean by this is... you can’t expect to have the local butcher, the town dentist and a few horse traders making multi million decisions. It just not working. Most of the Mayors across Durham region are careered politicians. Experts in municipal procedure but not intellectually able to retain the same level of responsibility in the private sector. Then, if this is to stand true. Why are we electing, technically incompetents. Insurance salesmen, realtors, retiree's, unemployable and so on. I think in order to run for office you should have a proven business success. You should have had previous similar decision making roles. You should have to pass a psychological assessment. Many today that sit in office and or are mayors have a clear mental deficiency as it is not about the public but more about assuring they maintain the status quo. Both as a politician and as a member of the “YES” internal team. And here is where ‘The Strong Mayors Powers’, stir thing to the point that we have mini men using powers to protect their interest and in the process fill their pockets with little or no accountability. Others, have free reign on fluffing retirement pensions. The so called POWERS - are a breeding ground for corruption and un-checked bribe taking. Like everything in society. The idea of Strong Mayors Powers is good for the good of the people in the hands of competent and balanced individuals. So far I question the integrity of the use and long term intent. Just recently it was brought to the attention of the media. That the Province is considering giving municipalities the right to get rid of elected officials on a vote of confidence. This would be so wrong from so many different sides. Collusion is alive and well at most Durham Region municipal governments. The general mentality is do as we do or else face the reality of coalition. Those that support the status quo are re-elected. Those that do not are deemed an outsider and their political life soon ends. We need to bring back fairness. We need to have standards for running for office. Academic as well as life experience that reflect the elected job position. We must stop making decision on staff recommendations and instead on what makes the most sense for our constituents. To think you know something, does not mean you anything. To know nothing means you know everything. We do not need thinkers. We need people that have the expertise and care to lead us and make all of our lives better not just theirs, through the opportunity of being elected to a position they are not qualified to be or ever held outside of politics.

The Rise of Cancel Culture: A Threat to Free Speech and Open Debate

By Dale Jodoin In recent years, the rise of "cancel culture" has sparked intense debate across the globe. While initially seen as a method for marginalized groups to call out harmful behavior or historical injustices, it has morphed into a movement that many critics argue stifles free speech, limits open debate, and threatens the very essence of democracy. Cancel culture finds its roots in the academic circles of universities, where ideas of social justice, identity politics, and progressive values began gaining traction. What initially started as a well-meaning push for equality and inclusion has, according to some critics, transformed into an extreme ideology that demands conformity and punishes those who dissent. Universities, once heralded as places of free thought and the exchange of ideas, are now seen by some as breeding grounds for the cancel culture movement. Professors and educators, who subscribe to progressive ideologies, are accused of brainwashing students into a one-sided worldview. They teach young minds to embrace a belief system that some argue prioritizes feelings over facts, and ideologies over open discussion. One of the most concerning aspects of cancel culture is its tendency to "cancel" historical figures, events, and ideologies without considering the context of the time. Statues of past leaders and historical figures are torn down, and names are scrubbed from buildings because they no longer align with the values of today. However, this approach to history is dangerous. By erasing or revising the past, we lose the opportunity to learn from it. Canceling the past, as some argue, is not about progress, but about control. If history is wiped clean, future generations have nothing to anchor their understanding of societal development. This erasure, according to critics, leaves a vacuum that can easily be filled by those in power with their own version of the truth. It’s as if the leaders of cancel culture believe that by eliminating the past, they can shape the future in their own image. The concern here is that this process destroys the essence of learning from history’s mistakes, which is vital for progress and growth. The most alarming consequence of this culture, according to detractors, is its impact on young minds. Critics argue that educators—those who should be teaching students to think critically and question everything—are instead indoctrinating them with narrow ideologies. In these environments, students are taught not to engage in meaningful debate but to "cancel" anything or anyone they disagree with. This trend creates a generation of young adults who lack the ability to think critically, who refuse to entertain opposing viewpoints, and who see disagreement as a personal attack rather than an opportunity for growth. Rather than fostering an environment of intellectual curiosity and diversity of thought, critics believe universities have become echo chambers for progressive ideologies, which in turn fuels cancel culture. One of the cornerstones of any democracy is free speech—the ability to express ideas and opinions without fear of retribution. However, cancel culture seems to threaten this fundamental right. In today’s climate, people fear speaking out on controversial issues, not because they are wrong, but because they might be "canceled." When individuals or groups are canceled, they are often shunned, boycotted, or ridiculed on social media and in public discourse. This has led to a chilling effect where people, particularly those in the public eye, are careful about what they say, often avoiding topics that could be seen as contentious or politically incorrect. This suppression of free speech is problematic for a functioning democracy. Without open debate, society cannot progress. Constructive disagreement allows us to challenge our ideas, reevaluate our beliefs, and come to more nuanced understandings of complex issues. When debate is stifled, society becomes stagnant, with one ideology dominating the narrative. Critics of cancel culture often point to the role of the elite—those in positions of power, wealth, and influence. They argue that these individuals use cancel culture as a tool to maintain their control over society. By manipulating public opinion and silencing dissenting voices, the elite ensure that their ideologies remain unchallenged. This has led to concerns that cancel culture is less about social justice and more about power. Politicians and influencers who align themselves with progressive causes are seen as gaining favor with these elites, while those who challenge the status quo are pushed to the margins. In this way, cancel culture serves as a method of social control, allowing the powerful to maintain their dominance over societal discourse. An ironic aspect of cancel culture is the contradiction within its ranks. Critics argue that the movement, which claims to fight for the rights of marginalized groups, often perpetuates the very forms of discrimination it seeks to eliminate. For example, many leaders of cancel culture movements are themselves from privileged backgrounds, and yet they claim to speak on behalf of minority groups. Additionally, while cancel culture condemns racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination, it often engages in these very behaviors by demonizing and silencing those who hold differing opinions. Some argue that cancel culture is a form of reverse discrimination, where one group is canceled in favor of another. One of the most controversial areas where cancel culture rears its head is in the debate over immigration and cultural identity. Some argue that immigrants should adopt the culture and laws of the country they move to, while others believe that countries should adapt to the diverse cultures that immigrants bring with them. Critics of cancel culture argue that it often pushes for the erasure of native cultures in favor of a new, homogenized society. This, they argue, is akin to soft population replacement, where the dominant culture is slowly replaced by another. The result is a loss of cultural identity, a disconnection from history, and a society that is constantly in flux, with no clear sense of direction or purpose. In conclusion, cancel culture presents a significant threat to free speech, open debate, and societal progress. While it is important to call out harmful behavior and address historical injustices, it is equally important to engage in open dialogue, respect differing viewpoints, and learn from history rather than erase it. To move forward, we must reject the extremes of cancel culture and instead foster an environment where ideas can be debated, where history can be understood in its context, and where individuals are free to express their beliefs without fear of retribution. Only then can we build a society that values true progress—one built on the foundation of free speech, critical thinking, and mutual respect.

Stop Killing the Kidneys with Garbage

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Multiple studies have shown that a diet of fruits and vegetables reduces blood pressure. Since hypertension kills millions of people each year, the message seems clear. But this is not the first time consumers have been told that a veggie diet is superior to one of meat. Now there’s another important message that millions of North Americans have not learned. It’s that people of all ages keep killing their kidneys by eating highly processed garbage day after day. Despite the evidence, they embrace this silent killer until the doctor says they need kidney dialysis or a renal transplant to save their life. First, know the basic facts. The kidneys, like the gastrointestinal system, remove waste. These two bean-shaped organs, each the size of your fist, are master chemists too. They regulate blood pressure, balance body fluids, produce hormones and red blood cells, and keep the blood from being too acidic or too alkaline. To accomplish all these tasks, the kidneys filter the blood in our body over and over every day. It’s a huge undertaking. Based on the research, one would think we would all be eating predominantly fruits and vegetables to help ensure healthy longevity to kidneys. Each kidney contains between 200,000 and one-or-more million nephrons. The number declines naturally with age or at an accelerated pace when asked to work overtime. Each nephron is an individual filter that removes urea from the blood while returning water and nutrients into circulation. Fruits and vegetables, including plant-based proteins, are easier on aging or compromised kidneys because they generally involve fewer toxins or other nutrients such as sodium, potassium, protein, or acid content that must be removed or balanced. Don’t be fooled by artificial foods that mimic meat and claim to be vegetables. If you can’t pronounce the ingredients on the label, think twice. What are other bad habits that are damaging so many kidneys? Shakespearean described the problem best with the line from Julius Ceasar, “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves”. We are the victims of our own stupidity. When you ask people to put all their pills in a paper bag, it’s amazing what you see. Look in that bag to get a clear picture of what’s been going on for years. North Americans have become victims of “Pillitis”. They rush to the pharmacy whenever they have simple ache and pain. Compared to our forebearers, we’ve become wimps about pain. Worse, they allow themselves to develop chronic conditions that doctors will treat with endless medication. What’s the result? Evolution did not prepare the kidneys to metabolize all this synthetic junk. The heavy workload causes them to start to fail, slowly and surely. Researchers in the UK report that 34% of adults over 75 have severe levels of kidney disease. Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) and naproxen (Aleve) is contributing to such shocking statistics. Researchers at the University of California also reported years ago this damning statistic, that the misuse of drugs resulted in a 19 percent increase every year in patients requiring renal dialysis machines. We could point to many more studies. But people do not heed the advice, and they die prematurely. What’s the message? A diet of fruits and vegetables helps improve blood pressure. It also lowers risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, macular degeneration of the eyes, arthritis and gastrointestinal troubles. But even if people adjust their diet, chronic kidney disease will continue to increase until people stop abusing their kidneys with garbage painkillers and endless other medications. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

A NEW COLUMN THAT PUTS THE SPOTLIGHT ON COUNCIL

Welcome to my new column in The Central entitled News From City Hall, a weekly look at all that does and doesn’t make sense from the Oshawa Council chamber, a place where decisions are made, personalities collide, and uninspiring theatrics often dominate. I have watched and recorded all aspects of city hall for 40 years, spanning six mayors and an ever-revolving door of councillors too numerous to mention. I have witnessed true statesmen dominate local politics, all the while having to tolerate some who seemed destined to be remembered as nothing more than an opportunistic interference in an otherwise valuable institution. Heroes like Ed Kolodzie and his brother Joe, long-time statesmen like Brian Nicholson, Jim Potticary and John Aker, and of course one or two local embarrassments most people would like to forget, such as Amy England who undoubtedly tops the list. As council returns from their summer recess, some of the issues I hope to be highlighting in future columns include the challenges that surround the downtown such as the struggles being faced by businesses who, on the one hand have seen much of their on-street parking simply disappear, and on the other have witnessed recent violence that is turning the heart of the city into a veritable war zone. Affordable housing initiatives come a close second with major projects such as the Fittings land redevelopment and the Oshawa Clinic transformation into a massive residential complex. Added to the list is the homeless problem, the use of Strong Mayor Powers, and the never ending struggle of Oshawa taxpayers trying to meet the demands of inflation and a voracious city hall always looking for more of your money. The next 12 months will surely be significant for the city and the region as these and other issues play out. COUNCILLOR GIBERSON IN BREACH OF CODE OF CONDUCT Readers will recall last week’s exclusive front page story where The Central was the first news outlet to publish the results of an Integrity Commissioner’s report that found Ward 4 councillor Derek Giberson in breach of the municipal Code of Conduct. This was based on a complaint that I filed earlier this year. The I.C. report found that Giberson, by commenting publicly regarding an issue that will be before the courts, contravened the obligation of elected officials to refrain from remarking on such matters. As such, his post on social media was considered contrary to the Code of Conduct. The report will be made public once Oshawa councillors have had a chance to review it and take action. To that end, I would like to share the following open letter to council that I prepared. “To Mayor Carter and Members of Council – You will soon be giving consideration to a report by the Integrity Commissioner as to one of your members having been found in breach of the Code of Conduct. The decision by councillor Giberson to allow himself the liberty of bringing into question the reputation and character of a private citizen by seeking to cast doubt on that person’s past activities, without any supporting evidence, was an abuse of his office and a total disregard as to the damage it could cause the individual affected. Councillor Giberson assumed far too much in deciding what was or was not “newsworthy” in a matter that will be before the courts. Further, it was not within councillor Giberson’s scope of office to try to affect the public’s opinion of a private individual in the first place. Based on the Integrity Commissioner’s decision, it would seem paramount for council to, not only demand councillor Giberson write a letter of apology to the individual concerned, but to ensure he is sanctioned in such a way as to show the citizens of Oshawa that council, as a whole, does not associate itself with such reckless activity on the part of councillor Giberson. The people of this city will be watching closely as council makes its decisions on this issue.” THIS WEEK IN COUNCIL HISTORY 1988 The Oshawa Times reported on Sept 21 that 300 homeowners were planning to gather at city hall to protest a proposed plaza at the NW corner of King St. and Harmony Rd. 11 Aldermen took turns shooting down the proposal, which was ultimately denied. Ward 3 Alderman Ed Kolodzie suggested a new library be built instead, however a five story Co-op building was eventually erected on the property, now known as the Harmony King Co-op. 1992 The Oshawa Times reported on Sept 17 that Durham Region councillors voted themselves a 4% pay hike over four years. Councillor Margaret Shaw said she was “appalled by the increase” and would refuse it, while councillor Brian Nicholson said “Don’t you realize we have to pay bills and taxes?” The raise would mean an extra $840 per year for councillors. 2018 The Oshawa This Week reported on Sept 19 that 200 people attended an all-candidates meeting for the Durham Regional chair election to be held that year. Candidates included Tom Dingwall, Oshawa Mayor John Henry, John Mutton, Muhammad Ahsin Sahi, and Peter Neal. John Henry would eventually win the election with 55% of the vote.

Questions Hiring Managers Ask Themselves When Assessing

By Nick Kossovan Readers often ask me for insight into the mysterious and confusing "how employers hire." While the recruitment process—keep in mind there's no universal recruitment process, as every employer assesses candidates differently—may seem shrouded in secrecy, there are common questions that hiring managers consider when evaluating job candidates. Your interviewer won't ask these common questions directly; they're in their mind. Hence, never take your interviewer's questions at face value; try to discern the underlying question. INTERVIEWER: "Do you live nearby?" QUESTION ACTUALLY BEING ASKED: Will this candidate be reliable? INTERVIEWER: "Tell me about a time you were in a conflict with a colleague and how you handled it. What was the outcome?" QUESTION ACTUALLY BEING ASKED: Will this candidate be easy to work with? Understanding, and therefore speaking to, the following four questions on every hiring manager's mind is a sure way to endear yourself to your interviewer. Will this person be a fit with the current team and company? The primary concern for a hiring manager is whether a candidate will seamlessly fit into the company's culture and existing team. Demonstrating how well you'll 'fit in,' you'll significantly increase your odds of getting hired. Employers are looking for more than just someone who can do the job. They're looking for candidates who'll be a natural fit and complement their current employees' work styles and personalities. A candidate who doesn't mesh well with the team will disrupt productivity, create interpersonal tensions, and drain morale. Therefore, understandably, hiring managers pay close attention to a candidate's communication style, emotional intelligence, and teamwork skills. Your interviewer is likely asking themselves: • How well is this [candidate's name] listening and responding to me? • Does [candidate's name] seem like someone who'd be comfortable working in a team? • Will [candidate's name] clash with [names of employees the candidate would be working closely with]? Ultimately, you want your interviewer to envision how you'll function in the existing workplace culture, that who'll be a natural fit, will hit the ground running and not be a square peg in a round hole. Contrary to entitlement-fueled belief, employers aren't responsible for you fitting into their workplace; that responsibility is entirely yours. Will they be easy to work with? (read: Will they be easy to manage?) With so much anti-employer rhetoric nowadays, hiring managers assess more than ever whether a candidate will be pleasant to work with and easy to manage. They want to avoid candidates who'll require handholding, are overly sensitive to feedback, or are simply difficult to work with. Skilled hiring managers recognize red flags such as: • Defensiveness or antagonism in response to questions • Rigid or inflexible thinking • Failure to take accountability for mistakes • Tendency to make excuses or blame others You want to come across as a candidate who's mature, resilient, and a proactive problem-solver with a growth mindset, not someone who'll be a high-maintenance employee. Will they be a liability? Employees are liabilities. Employers want to minimize their liabilities. A critical aspect of hiring is vetting candidates to ensure nothing in their background could adversely affect the company. (e.g., offensive online behaviour, having been let go for cause, exaggerating or lying about their experience and qualifications) Ultimately, hiring managers must be confident that a new hire won't bring any legal, ethical, or behavioural baggage that could expose the company to liability. The company must trust that the chosen candidate will be responsible, hardworking, ethical, and professional and that their outside activities, especially online, will not harm its brand and reputation. Will they stick around? I've yet to meet a hiring manager who doesn't gravitate toward a candidate they feel will be a loyal, engaged, committed long-term employee. After not deeming a candidate a fit, having a feeling or getting the impression that the candidate is only looking for a stepping stone is the second most likely reason I reject a candidate. Onboarding and recruiting are time-consuming and expensive; therefore, employers aim to avoid disruptions and costs associated with turnover. Your interviewer will look for signs that you're genuinely interested in the role and the company as opposed to just a paycheck. Hence, you'll be asked about your long-term career goals and, if you're currently employed, why you're looking for a new job. (Rare is the candidate who answers this convincingly.) Your work ethic, reliability, and ability to handle the role's demands are all qualities you want your interviewer to get a sense of. Provide evidence that you have stamina, the ability to adapt, and the commitment to succeed. Keep in mind employers want to reduce costly turnover as much as possible. Your interviewer will pass on your application if they feel you will be around only briefly. Finding the right candidate isn't about skills and experience; these are secondary. Someone who'll foremost be a loyal and engaged employee and has the right skills and experience is the right candidate. If you feel you're acing interviews ("I aced the interview! I answered every question on point.") but not getting offers, it's likely because you didn't answer the four aforementioned questions every hiring manager asks themselves when interviewing. __________________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com