CITIZENS OF PICKERING BEWARE, ONCE AGAIN YOUR MAYOR USES HIS POWER TO SILENCE YOU, HIS CONSTITUENTS!

At the 7:00 pm March 25th., 2024 Pickering City Council Meeting things started with the Mayor making the usual opening remarks, So good so far ... But then things changed ……The Mayor quickly stated “there is a motion to amend the agenda to bring 12..2 and 14.5 up first” a citizen in the gallery called out “excuse me sir”, the Mayor was quick to shut him down saying “that’s not how it works here, if you’re on the delegation you’ll get a chance to speak”, and called for the vote. Hmmm …. The Mayor must be hearing voices, he had been the only one speaking since he opened the meeting, one of the councilors would have had to speak up to make the motion he Mayor spoke of, but, that didn’t happen. Note the 5 councilors, Brenner, Butt, Cook, Nagy and Pickles never batted an eye when the Mayor said there was a motion, it’s almost as if they knew about this before the meeting. Hmmm … I wonder don’t you? The vote to bring the items to the top of the meeting passed 6 - 1. During the debate that followed Councillor Robinson put forward a question to the Mayor, “if we pass 12.2 does that mean the citizens who showed up to speak at the Open Question Period would not be able to speak? The Mayor carefully dodged the question saying “he didn’t see any requests to speak to the agenda that if they did they would be allowed”. Councillor Robinson quickly pointed out it was refer-ring to the Open Question Period and the Mayor had to admit that Councillor Robinson was cor- rect, the citizens that showed up to speak in the Open Question Period would not be allowed to speak. Councillor Robinson commented that that didn’t seem very democratic. The Mayor in a huff was quick to answer “No, Council makes the rules”, resulting in a bit of a low moaning from the citizens to which the Mayor called out “Order folks, I will not stand for people speaking out of place” .… “and want a respectful and safe space” …. ”Please refrain from speaking” … “SIR, we do not allow hand raising if you want to speak make a delegation”. Councillor Robinson brought up more important questions but failed to get proper answers. The vote to pass 12.2 and 14.5 passed 6 - 1. Note in the agendas,12.2 and 14.5 referred to reports & ref #’s of bylaws etc. . The average citizen had no way of knowing it was regarding the “Open Question Period”. It truly does seem that the Mayor, Brenner, Butt, Cook, Nagy and Pickles do not want the people they are suppose to represent, to have any say or input unless, it is something they are promoting. Hmmm … could it be that the Mayor and the other 5 councilors, Brenner, Butt, Cook, Nagy & Pickles wanted to silence their constituents? As the meeting continued The Mayor showed his contempt by the disrespectful way he introduced the delegates that defended Councillor Robinson, which he did again in his posted report following the meeting, saying that most delegates were not from Pickering, however he failed to mention that most of the delegates that he backed in the February Council Meeting were also from outside of Pickering. Hmmm …. It seems the Mayor’s definition of respect is a one way street. He is constantly yelling at Councillor Robinson when he doesn’t have the answers, yelling at the citizens when they object to his quick by passes of rules etc and he, the Mayor, even went as far as having a city approved delegate, a senior woman, who refused to be silenced when speaking over her allotted time, removed, arrested and charged with trespassing. It appears that this Mayor believes he is above all others and not to be questioned. His version of truth is embellishing the half to his benefit. An example is how he made it sound that the 8 or 9 delegates made it a long meeting that had to continue another day while failing to mention the number of other items, recommendations, motions, by-laws, new business etc on the agenda. Anyone can watch the videos of the council meetings, past and present. on youtube DON’T BE PART OF THE SILENT MAJORITY THAT WAKES UP ONLY TO FIND IT’S TOO LATE. STOP THE SILENCE ~ START THE CONVERSATION ~ SPEAK UP FOR WHAT IS RIGHT OH CANADA, WE STAND ON GUARD FOR THEE

Tackling Homelessness through an Agricultural Lens

By Maurice Brenner Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering With the help of TACC, who owns the property at 690 Third Concession (Greenbelt-Agricultural Lands) and DARs, along with the financial support of Pickering Council through a $50,000 grant paid for from Casino revenues, Mayor Kevin Ashe myself and Councillor Shaheen Butt joined Margaret Eskins and numerous community volunteers for the Official launch of one of Canada's first transitional housing entrepreneurship projects that will provide affordable transitional housing for up to 7 residents. The residents will have an opportunity to be part of a model through an Agricultural lens that includes farming and production of fresh produce and eggs for consumption. Excess produce will be donated to the Pickering FoodBank, as well as being sold at the Farmers Market. Creating a sense of home is part of this model with residents Having an opportunity w to transform this century farmhouse into their home with the assistance of qualified contractors. Watch for further updates with a ribbon cutting scheduled for October 10, International Homeless day Awareness.

The Erosion of Democracy in Pickering and Beyond

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor In the heart of Pickering, a troubling trend is unraveling – the systematic erosion of democratic principles. The very foundation upon which our society thrives, the democratic process, is under attack, leaving citizens disenfranchised and their voices silenced. The Corporation for the City of Pickering seems to be on a rampage, spearheading changes to policies and procedures that chip away at the rights of its citizens to engage in their governance. Fundamental to any democratic society is the ability for people to ask questions, seek transparency, and hold their elected officials accountable. However, these pillars of democracy are crumbling in Pickering. Questions posed to staff and/or Council go unanswered, or their responses are veiled in half-truths, leaving citizens in the dark and fostering an environment of distrust. Time limits on speaking are arbitrarily slashed, question period removed, stifling of dissenting voices and undermining the principle of free speech. Microphones are muted at the whim of those in power, censoring viewpoints deemed unfavorable or inconvenient. The recent banning of public video recording last Monday night, grants the Corporation of the City of Pickering the unchecked authority to shape its narrative. I, and others have personally witnessed glitches and time jumps when reviewing the City’s previous meetings. Not having accurate recordings makes it impossible for those to see and/or hear the truth of public meetings that are held within Council Chambers. This move potentially provides the city with a tool to manipulate its narrative at will, easily eroding the public’s trust in its government. Bullying and intimidation for years have always played a part within Pickering Council. With Councillor’s now presenting opposing views on hehalf of their constituents, these tactics of bullying, intimidation, and now name-calling, have also begun to run rampant, in lockstep with the censoring. Opposing views of Councillor’s on behalf of their constituents are met not with dialogue or debate, but with threats of referral to integrity commissioner and character assassination, all of this is just a distraction, while issues that challenge the status quo or expose political posturing and corruption are swept under the rug. Residents of Durham, Pickering, and beyond are not only being silenced but have also been facing trespassing charges or even arrests for simply refusing to halt their speech when instructed by the mayor, or worse, for expressing their feelings. I, in no way, condone threatening behaviour, however, it is important to distinguish between actual threats and mere feelings of threat. Just because someone feels threatened does not necessarily mean a genuine threat exists, and we must avoid conflating the two. This alarming trend illustrates a dangerous shift where individuals' feelings seemingly trump basic democratic rights. This underscores the urgent need to confront and challenge the erosion of democratic values, ensuring that the rights of citizens are upheld and protected against arbitrary suppression and intimidation tactics. Governments at all levels, not only Municipal, continue to widen the gap between themselves and the people, fueling frustration by spending taxpayer's money with reckless abandon, as if it were their own, without true community engagement or accountability. The days of consulting “the people” and putting their interests above all else seem to be a distant memory. Sadly, Pickering is not alone in this assault on democracy. This death of democratic values reverberates across many municipalities, signaling a pervasive and insidious threat to the very essence of our society. Councillors and School trustees have been resigning amidst bullying and intimidations from colleagues with some tragic cases resulting in loss of life, while governments preach mental health advocacy and boast of code of conduct policies yet permit group targeting of individuals simply for carrying out their duties for the constituents. In the face of such adversity, we are beginning to see a rise in citizens standing united in defense of democracy. Demanding accountability, transparency, and the restoration of our fundamental rights. We the people have a right to be heard, respected, and valued. The democratic process is not a privilege reserved for the few but a right belonging to us all. I stand in solidarity with our Charter of Rights, the people of Pickering, and the preservation of the Democratic process. I believe in upholding morals, truth, and integrity, and prioritizing the needs of the people above all else. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

SWEET BITTER REALITY

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher It breaks my heart to drive by Memorial Park and witness all the homeless sleeping along door ways and in the park. The other day I decided to pull over sit on one of the benches and just watch. One particular man caught my attention. A male in his 50’s. Sitting there rocking back and forth. As I looked at him, I could not help mentally become him. I pictured in my mind sitting there cold, hungry with no place to go. My body aches from sleeping on the floor or behind dumpster. I once had a home a family. Time slowly took that away from me. The economy forced me to foreclose. My wife left me. My kids live far away. I sit here all alone. No one to turn too. The only thing I have left are my memories. Memories of a loving mother and father. Memory of my wife and her gentle touch... the smile of my children as I came back from work. The joy I felt when we were a family. Watching them grow up only to leave me to start their own lives. My heart aches as once I was everyone’s crutch and rock. Today I am nothing but an old man. Broke, with no place to go. I wonder where my next meal will come from. I go to the local food bank and the local kitchen. Even though they are nice there. The smells, the people make it hard at times to enjoy the food even though I am starving. I see how people look at me sitting here. Thinking what a bum. As probably did when I had a home and family. As I look back. I can’t help to notice them in me. As anyone can become me. I do not want to on the street. I tried applying for menial jobs. I have no phone. No home. Hard for employees to get back to me. I know I have rags for clothing and I smell from being outdoors all the time. My Canada has become a harsh place to live. I seen people relieving themselves at the park. I see how people stare. As this even disgusts me. I can appreciate that when you are on the street. We don’t have a bathroom we can just walk in. In most cases I try to use a restaurant bathroom only to be kicked out. I tried going at the City Hall. Only to be tossed out. My life has no value. I can understand the many around me hooked on drugs. Specially the younger ones. There is nothing for them on the street. Except loneliness and despair. I don’t know what my future will bring. All, I know is that I am surviving from day to day. Life is hard. I never thought it would get this bad. Even in the worst of times. I never experienced such loneliness. I feel like an animal trapped in a human body. At the least with an animal they round you up and put you to sleep. The many shelters are not sufficient in getting people like me off the streets. My mind is slowly going as my fears wether real of my mind tricking me are becoming more intense. I need help to get me back on track. I want my life back. I want a second chance. I feel as my government has let me down. After all the years of paying taxes. For what? Festive seasons come and go. I sit here watching it all pass by. Easter is a time to enjoy a sweet in the name of a holiday. Remember while you enjoy a sweet. I be out here enjoying a sweet - bitter realty that could happen to all of us.

Ontario 2024 Spring Budget

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The 2024 Springbudget, titled “Building a Better Ontario” and released on March 26, 2024, builds on provincial promises made over the last year. It places a focus on infrastructure and healthcare spending while ensuring that taxpayers do not have to reach into their pocketbooksjust yet. Budget day is important for the government, but more so for the citizens that the government’s choices will affect. Cushioned in a lot of appropriate verbiage that we arenow usedto from the Ford government and Minister of Finance Peter Bethlenfalvy, the budgetlooks promising on the surface. "These investments and more are a signal to Ontarians of our commitment to keep building Ontario while retaining a prudent, targeted and a responsible approach to public finances," Bethlenfalvy said at a news conference. "We're not backing down from investing in what matters most and we are not going to increase costs on our people." Total budget spending has surpassed last year’s, making it the largest in the province’s history at about $214.5 billion. Close to $194.5 billion of that is for programming. With spending up for various projects, this is a real wish list of good intentions,however without any concrete anchor in reality. It is concerning that as a resultof this budget, forecasts for Ontario's deficit will more than triple from $3 billion last year to $9.8 billion in 2024-2025. This is the highest non-COVID budget deficit since former premier Kathleen Wynne's 2014 spending plan.The government justified the deficit increase as caused by slowing economic growth projections leading to lower tax revenues. Here we go again, experiencing the kind of overblown budget the architects of the current budget criticized so vehemently when it was a liberal budget. What remarkable memories eh? Last year's budget predicted Ontario would be back in the black with a modest surplus of $200 million by 2024-2025. Now, the expected return to balance has been pushed to 2026-2027 — the year of the next election — with a projected $500 million surplus.Do you believe in Santa Claus? So let’s take a look at the promises made in the budget. In total, the province is forecasting $205.7 billion in revenue in the coming fiscal year, and $214.5 billion in spending, up from $207.3 billion spent last year. Base spending on health care, the largest slice of the budget pie, will increase from $74.6 billion to $75.6 billion. This represents a below-inflation increase of only 1.3 per cent, amid an ongoing family doctor shortage and a growing population. To address the shortage of family doctors, the province will establish a medical school primarily focused on family medicine at York University in Toronto. With Ontario also suffering major nursing shortages, the government promises to invest an additional $128 million over three years to boost nursing student enrolment at universities and colleges. Key health spending initiatives include $564 million over three years to connect approximately 600,000 people to primary health care teams and a $155 million construction subsidy to fast-track the construction of long-term care homes. New money in the budget includes an additional $2 billion over three years for home and community care, a $200-million community sport and recreation infrastructure fund and more money for autism therapies. The government is also planning a big increase in spending to improve high-speed internet access across Ontario, with $1.3 billion allocated this year, up from $300 million in each of the previous few years. To help Ontarians cover increased costs, the province will extend the tax cut that reduces the gas tax by 5.7 cents per litre and diesel fuel tax by 5.3 cents per litre, until December. The cut, scheduled to expire on June 30, has saved households an annual average of $320 since it was introduced, the province estimates. More Ontarians will be eligible for subsidies that reduce their electricity bills, a move that will push the cost of that program above $7 billion. To support the province's housing plans, the government is investing more than $1.8 billion in two funds that will help municipalities build "housing-enabling" infrastructure, including roads, bridges, drinking water, waste-water and storm-water infrastructure. The province will also allow all single and upper-tier municipalities to impose a tax on vacant homes. Currently, only Toronto, Ottawa and Hamilton have that authority. A new policy framework will also encourage municipalities to set a higher tax rate on foreign-owned vacant homes. Municipalities will be allowed to lower their property tax rates on new purpose-built rental housing to encourage construction of those types of units. These moves are intended to speed up the construction of homes to meet the goal of building 1.5 million new homes by 2031.However, figures in the budget show the province is way behind schedule.There were 89,300 housing starts in Ontario in 2023, with 87,900 projected for 2024, 92,000 for 2025 and 94,400 for 2026, when at least 150,000 per year are needed to achieve the province's goal. The budget advances existing spending plans for highways and roads, without new cost breakdowns for the government’s flagship projects like Highway 413 or the Bradford Bypass. About $37.6 billion will be spent on the education sector and $40 billion will be put into “other programs” …and let’s not forget that Interest on debt takes up about $13.9 billion of provincial spending. This quick overview of the budget clearly indicates that the Ontario government needs to provide better information to the public on service improvements and when capital construction projects will be completed. This year’s budget leaves many questions unanswered,consistingas it does, of general statements on improvements needed and broad comments on what is being planned. On a detailed level, it is impossible to decipher how taxpayer money is being spent relative to prior years. It does not say what that planned spending will accomplish in the short, medium and long term, nor whether that will meet the public’s needs. The budget indicates that “Ontario’s Plan to Build” includes the most ambitious capital plan in the province’s history, with $190.2 billion over the next decade to support growing business, families and newcomers. However, additional information on expected in-service dates and projected costs for each major project over a certain threshold would provide more useful information. How will the government address identified public service gaps, program waiting lists, health service wait times, school class sizes, deferred capital maintenance expenditures, etc.? Rather than practical solutions, this budget has focused on the discussion of revenues, expenses, capital investments, economic indicators and general plans presented in charts and narrative form. This must change to put the emphasis on how precious taxpayer dollars are spent, and what results will be achieved, for which the government will take responsibility. This element is completely missing from the current budget. So now, let us see if we can expect something better from the upcoming federal budget. Keep your fingers crossed!

Does AI help level the playing field for SMEs?

By Daryl Ching, CFA | Managing Partner Vistance Capital Advisory Artificial intelligence has dominated the news with pundits suggesting that this could be biggest game changer in business since the invention of the internet. To what extent have SMEs been adopting AI and is it a game changer to the extent it levels the playing field against larger businesses? My name is Daryl Ching and I am the founder and CEO of Vistance Capital Advisory a fractional CFO, accounting and capital raising firm. I am a big believer in adopting technology to create efficiencies in processes. Working with SMEs, I am constantly researching the capabilities of AI and how it can help our clients and ourselves. Many SMEs have adopted AI into their marketing content. Andrew Crook runs PC275 Realty, a real estate brokerage and business advisory firm and has used AI to create graphics and manage marketing performance data. He spends about $1,000 a month for AI tools for services that would normally cost about $5,000 per month through a marketing agency or hiring internal staff. He also uses AI to generate content for business strategy sessions through his consulting practice. While AI has not necessarily transformed his business, it has freed many hours of time which has improved his quality of life and allowed him to spend more time with his family. Many SMEs have figured out how to use AI to perform administrative tasks. Ilya Peskov, CEO of Focus 21, an IT software company has used AI to generate transcripts of meeting notes, review grammar and spelling and review legal documentation to ensure all clauses are captured. As a result, Ilya’s team has been able to spend their time on less administrative and more value-added work. Olga Pawluczyk, CEO of P&P Optica has developed a unique smart detection imaging system to detect foreign materials in food processing. The entire premise of the business required machine learning and AI to create the product. Had it not been for AI, the task of analyzing a lot of information to detect foreign materials on a production line, at line speed, would be impossible. P&P Optica is an example of an SME that couldn’t deliver a product at all without the use of AI. While I feel the advance of AI technology is a net positive for SMEs, it is worth discussing some of the risks. AI is only as good as the information it is fed to make decisions. As more information is fed into the system, it becomes more and more difficult to validate the accuracy and source of information. I also fear the possibility that AI will have the effect of reducing critical thinking by individuals as they take results from AI as gospel. Ilya Peskov believes that AI has generated about a 30% savings in time for his coders using Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini. However, he recalls his early days in IT education where he used Stack Overflow and was required to learn grass roots coding. With AI, he is cognizant of a risk that at some point in the future developers will lose the rudimentary skills of programming and coding. As AI evolves, we believe that it can be a game changer for SMEs. However, it important to ensure that we keep AI in check, question the results, validate the sources and make sure people do not turn off their critical thinking. However, if used correctly, it can certainly help level the playing field for SMEs.

SHOCKED BY O.P.U.C

By Rosaldo Russo Allow me to begin this column by thanking the Oshawa/Central newspaper for allowing me the opportunity and access to the press. Not to many if any allow an average person like me to tell the world what I see and think. In my opinion. The Editor/Publisher is a real upstanding type of guy. He shoots from the hip and hold traditional core values. My name is Rosaldo Russo. I came to this great country to make a better life for myself and my family. I thank Canada for everything it has allowed me to do and earn. I worked construction all my life. I know the value of hard work and honesty. I remember as a boy my father always telling me to work hard and buy land. So I did. I remember days when I did not have enough to eat. I go to work... but I did not wait for hand outs. I rounded up my pride my skill and my determination to succeed and went to work. In those days the only benefits we received was the fact we were employed. Before retiring I was the owner and operator of local material supply company that allowed me to retired without worry. Now that I have time to enjoy life. I look around me and have some concern for future generations. I see that the world is finished. Just for Easter. A little bitter sweet news. Now don’t get me wrong. But when I say the world is finished. I really mean it. The other day. I had a $1,900. O.P.U.C bill I had to pay. I thought, Ok. I will go down to the office downtown Beirut... or it seems. As the roads are full of pot holes. Parking is outrageous and any given moment you can get shot by some punk or junkie demanding you give him cash so he can run down to Simcoe St. United Church and be saved by the local junkie at the corner of Simcoe and Bagot...Or maybe go to the free for all Back Door Mission. Where with my tax dollar these people can go and find refuge as they shoot up. Meanwhile here I am approaching the front door of the O.P.U.C. A security guard informs me that I can’t drop off the cheque as they don’t have the old mailbox they use to have. It was a great service to the community. NO MORE. I then approached to go in the building. The guard at the door practically body slammed me to the sidewalk. He informed me that you can’t go in and pay the bill. Or leave the cheque. I was floored. Where it the customer service? I then asked him how do I pay. He said you have to mail it in. Or you have to go online. I just drove from Columbus all the way down for nothing? Where is the customer service? It is like going to the City hall. Same thing. You are met up with a series of security guards. These guards are rude and forward. When you go in to the main lobby you have one option. Front desk. You can’t go up the elevator to any department. This is ridiculous. In most cases they direct you to a web site... a web site that is far from user friendly and extremely hard to navigate. The City can surely increase your taxes and demand you pay them on time. What happened to customer service? They treat you like cattle with the arrogance of what are you going to do. It has got so bad that the City does not advertise announcement. road closure, events in the local paper. The City elect are so bias and prejudice that only care about themselves and to assure they get elected back the following election. Disgusting. I am shocked at the OPUC, The City of Oshawa....

For better or for worse

For better or for worse By Dale Jodoin In an era where the world is a mosaic of beliefs, with myriad deities and doctrines, humanity finds itself at a crossroads, searching for a singular truth to quench its spiritual thirst. Amidst this quest, a new sovereign has emerged, not clad in religious garb or speaking in divine tongues, but robed in the authoritative vestments of legislation and decree. The proclamation is clear and resounding: there is but one deity now, and its name is Science, as ordained by the government. This new creed, the religion of Science, speaks not in whispers but in firm, unyielding statements. It transcends the traditional realms of climate, biology, and cosmology, casting its sacred gaze upon every facet of existence, from the mysteries of the universe to the intricacies of human sexuality. Its commandments are inscribed not on perishable parchment or transient tablets, but in the indelible stone of legislation, its every decree echoing through the halls of power and corridors of control. Gone are the days when Science was a humble seeker of truth, open to challenge and correction. The new dogma is infallible, a monolithic entity that brooks no dissent. It asserts that to doubt its authority is to dwell in ignorance, for it is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. This transformation is not merely a shift in perception but a seismic change in the very foundation of societal belief systems. The Church of Scientific Omnipotence, as it has come to be known, though unofficially, wields two sacrosanct scepters: money and power. Every scientist within its hallowed halls is a disciple, their allegiance bought and bound by the golden chains of funding and the heady allure of influence. They chant in unison the mantras of consensus, their voices never straying from the twin doctrines that fuel their faith and fill their coffers. As this new ecclesiastical order cements its dominion, it casts a shadow over all dissenting voices. Traditional religions, once mighty in their own right, now tread carefully on this sacrosanct ground, their prophetic voices muted by the threat of losing their cherished status and financial sanctity. The religion of Science demands not just passive acquiescence but active participation in its rituals of compliance and conformity. In this brave new world, the very essence of faith is being redefined. C

hurches and temples, once sanctuaries of spiritual solace and divine connection, now bow before the altar of scientific dogma, their doctrines aligned with the decrees of their new sovereign. The narrative is no longer about the divine or the eternal but about the immediate and the material, with power and wealth as the ultimate deities to be worshipped. The name of this omnipotent religion remains shrouded in secrecy, its title unspoken, as if its very utterance would unveil the facade of its sanctity. But the parallels are stark and unmistakable, echoing through history's corridors. Just as the kings and emperors of old wielded religion as a tool of control and dominion, so too does the modern state employ the religion of Science to command and conquer. Statistics and historical records reveal this cyclical saga of power: once, kings and pharaohs proclaimed themselves gods or representatives of the divine, their words law and their decrees sacred. Today, governments, through the mantle of scientific authority, enact a similar sovereignty, their edicts draped in the cloak of empirical irrefutability and their mandates enforced with the rigid certainty of mathematical precision. As we navigate this epoch of the Church of Scientific Omnipotence, the landscape of faith and belief is irrevocably altered. The divine has been dethroned, replaced by the deity of data, the sanctity of statistics, and the gospel of governance. Yet, beneath this seemingly impenetrable canopy of scientific dogmatism, whispers of dissent and pockets of resistance stir, hinting at a future where the sacred flame of inquiry and the quest for spiritual truth might once again illuminate the human journey. In conclusion, as the government's new religion of Science continues to unfold its chapters, we remain vigilant, chronicling its ascent and its impact on the tapestry of human belief. Its name may be unspoken, its full doctrine yet to be unveiled, but its presence is undeniable, reshaping our world in its own image, for better or for worse.

Guide Your Job Search With These Two Universal Truths

By Nick Kossovan There's no shortage of job search advice floating around that contradicts. · Resumes (formatting, length, how to beat the employer's ATS, as if that's possible) · Cover letters (Include or don't include?) · Whether using LinkedIn's #OpenToWork green banner feature makes you appear desperate. · Interview advice All job search advice, including mine, is subject to bias. My first The Art of Finding Work column was titled There Is No Universal Hiring Methodology. In this column, I explained that hiring is more emotional than logical and, therefore, a highly subjective process. Protest all you want; the fact remains that hiring is heavily influenced by biases and gut feelings, resulting in no two recruiters or hiring managers assessing candidates the same way. One interviewer's deal breaker may not be another's. Self-proclaiming career coaches like to claim that the formula for successful job hunting is A + B + C = "You're hired!" Predictably, they also claim they have the formula for you to purchase (book, webinar, becoming a client of their coaching service). My question: How can a formula exist with gut instinct being the driving force behind hiring decisions? I've hired: · a candidate was more than 20 minutes late for their interview. · candidates who asked, within five minutes of starting the interview, "How many vacation days will I get?" · candidates who've been unemployed for more than nine months. · candidates (lost count of) who were over the age of 50. · a candidate who brought her cat, Duchess, who'd undergone surgery that morning, to the interview. (This hire was a stretch even for me, but I couldn't ignore her career story, set of skills, and strong personality.) Another hiring manager would have likely rejected these candidates. Vice versa, candidates I've rejected inevitably went on to be hired by hiring managers who didn't consider why I rejected them relevant. Rather than trying to juggle all the conflicting job search advice you're receiving—attempting to please all employers—focus on, better yet embrace, these two universal truisms. 1. Your success depends on what others think of you. Nowadays, the standard "life advice" is to not care what other people think about you. This advice, which I strongly disagree with, has led to the prevalence of self-centred behaviour. Being successful is highly dependent on your image and what others think of you. Searching for a job involves actively seeking approval. First you need the employer to approve—like what they see—your resume and LinkedIn profile. Then, to be approved for an in-person interview, you must pass a phone screening. Then, your interviewer must approve you for a second interview or to be hired. All these approvals required someone to think you deserve a "yes." If everyone actually didn't care what others thought of them, social media wouldn't be filled with approval-seeking posts, and rejection wouldn't hurt. Yet, job seekers constantly complain about being rejected (read: not approved) without receiving feedback, suggesting they care what their interviewer thought of them. As you realize how others perceive you is the key determining factor to your success, you'll ask yourself: How do people experience me? Be honest. How do people experience you? How do people feel in your presence? A challenge: 1. Solicit the opinion(s) of family members and friends regarding how they perceive you. 2. Based on the feedback, adjust your behaviour and shift your thinking. 3. Make it your mission to give those in your presence a memorable interpersonal experience. 2. Image is everything. People watch in a mall, restaurant, or on a busy street. You'll notice that most people don't take their image seriously or subscribe to the "don't care what other people think of you" advice. Whether you like it or not, humans are wired to judge a book by its cover. Therefore, how someone experiences you begins with your appearance. When it comes to interviewing, having an off-putting appearance will overshadow—not in a good way—your answers. When interviewing, you must be the best version of yourself. Consider this uncomfortable question: Those times when you aced, at least thought you did, the interview but didn't get the job, could it have been because of your appearance? According to research, a person's opinion of you is formed in just three seconds. Psychologists call it "thin slicing." Your interviewer will make four snap judgments when meeting you for the first time: 1. Are you trustworthy? 2. Intelligence level 3. Your professionalism 4. Whether they like you Everything I mentioned can be influenced, starting with how you dress and by looking your interviewer in the eye. Then, check your mannerisms and communication skills; both are imperative to your job search and career success. Looking your best gives you the mental state you need more than ever in today's competitive job market: Confidence. Commit to the following: · Exercising · Eating healthy · Getting enough sleep · Wearing proper fitting age-appropriate clothes · Smiling (Your teeth' role in how people perceive you can't be overstated.) Hire an image consultant if you need one; it’ll be money well spent. Don't underestimate, or worse, deny, the correlation between how your physical appearance impacts your life experiences and opportunities. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Spirits

from Wayne & Tamara I was looking for the miraculous "answer to my life," when I came across your column. I don't have anyone to ask for a neutral opinion so I am hoping you can give me some insight. I met my husband when I was 18 and started dating him when I was 21. In 1991, shortly after I moved in with him, he lost his license for drunk driving after a Christmas party. I always had an excuse for him. His parents were alcoholics, well-known in town for their successful businesses and lack of success in family life. Fast forward to three years ago. The kids were affected by our arguments and knowing "daddy drinks too much." One night my husband actually dropped our son on his head. I finally had it. I gave him an ultimatum. If he wanted to sulk about the past and drink, he could do it without me and the children. He vowed to quit forever and checked into rehab and did counseling. We moved to a new town with new friends. I don't expect perfection, but I do expect honesty and he can't tell me the truth. He claims to go to AA meetings in towns that don't have AA meetings. How can I respect or be intimate with someone who lies? On top of that he has an anger problem. Not physically, but sometimes I wish he would just hit me. As crazy as it sounds, it would make my decision easier. As I type this, man, it seems so clear. I have to get out of here, but I grew up not believing in divorce. Sharon Sharon, you say you don't believe in divorce as if you are saying you don't believe in ghosts. But divorce exists, and it exists for a reason. When one person in the marriage won't participate, and the children are being damaged, that is a reason for divorce. Even now you are excusing your husband. You say he lost his license after a Christmas party. Christmas has nothing to do with it. He was drunk. He is still drunk. There aren't any miraculous answers to your life, but there are realistic ones. You've tried patience, understanding, rehab, and counseling. It hasn't gone anywhere. Tamara Just Say No I seem to be in an impossible situation. I am 31 and never married. I work as a software developer and am quite happy in my current living situation. But my family is pestering me to at least consider marriage, even saying they can find me girls. I don't want to get married. I've never had a girlfriend or even dated in my life. I've learned to be content without any romantic relations, and I don't want to start. Even though I live a long way from my parents, they talk to me on the phone about it every day. This affects my ability to enjoy life, which is a big part of being single. I enjoy my freedom and don't want to give it up just because everyone expects me to get married and have a family. Is there any way out of getting married? I know I can be happy living by myself, and don't like to consider marriage and children. Dev Dev, we are not the property of our parents. At some point, our lives become our own. When your parents urge you to marry, remember it is not a wish for you. It is a wish for themselves. Sometimes it is easier to stand up for someone else. It would be a great injustice to any woman if you marry her against your will. Every day your mom and dad can ask you to marry, but they cannot stop you from saying no every single time. Wayne SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

Some Advice Never Ages

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford After 10 books, over 2,500 columns, and nearly 50 years of writing it, some things bear repeating. This week revisits a column from three decades ago about how to prepare for surgery. Has anything changed? From that old column, “What would God do if He were a surgeon? If it is true God helps those who help themselves, He would refuse to operate on many, telling us, ‘Respect your own God-given body and then I’ll do what I can.’” Next came a case. “A 45-year-old woman underwent an operation for extensive vaginal repair. For this type of surgery, her surgeon warned her repeatedly about the hazards of smoking and her persistent smoker’s hack. Ten days later she was rushed to hospital because of sudden post-operative hemorrhage. Incredibly, she was still smoking and coughing convulsively as she lay in a pool of blood in the emergency room. Speedy surgery stopped the bleeding.” Then another case. “A 45- year-old diabetic weighing 275 pounds was admitted to the hospital due to an acute gallbladder attack. A skilled surgeon removed the organ, but a lifetime of bad habits began slowly to take its toll. The patient’s diabetes was hard to control and the incision in the pendulous abdomen became infected. Shortly after, the patient developed pneumonia, phlebitis, and blood clots in the lungs. Family members watched the complications multiply and the situation deteriorate. When the patient succumbed to overwhelming odds, the family demanded of the surgeon, ‘Why did this happen? Why couldn’t you have done something?’” It needs no repeating what that column reported next. Suffice to say, the surgeon answered truthfully that the patient’s weight, smoking, and lack of exercise caused the death. Let’s read on. “No doctor turns away a patient who has an acute surgical problem. But patients can’t expect doctors to work miracles with surgery when they haven’t given a tinker’s damn about their bodies for years. I think God would agree it’s time to issue an ultimatum to everyone. God and surgeons shouldn’t attempt the impossible. And patients should be expected to help themselves by shaping up.” The article then gave advice on how pre-operative patients can prepare for an operation, physically and mentally. “Surgery, like tennis or football, demands psychological preparation. A good start is to get rid of needless worries. Tell the doctor if you are overcome by a fear of not surviving the surgery. Of if you’re concerned about post-operative pain. Or confused about which organs will be removed. And if you’re apprehensive about the length of the incision, remember Abe Lincoln’s remark. He was once asked, ‘How long should a man’s leg be?’ He replied, ‘Just long enough to reach the ground.’ Incisions, like legs, are just long enough to do the job safely. “The main thrust of preparation should be directed at good physical conditioning. Some of these tragedies could be prevented if patients tossed away cigarettes before an operation or made a genuine attempt to control and lose weight. “My advice is to be prepared for possible surgery all of the time. This means having a lifelong respect for mind and body. It would give surgeons fewer gray hairs. Fewer families would be asking why post-operative complications occurred. And I’m sure God would be more willing to help those who help themselves.” There you have it. While surgical techniques may have improved greatly over 30 years, have patients heeded the age-old call to prepare for surgery? Doing so would give surgeons a much-needed break in tough cases. And starting early enough may even prevent the need for going under the knife in the first place Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

The Slow Death of Democracy

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor Democracy is the cornerstone of our society, and today it is facing a grave and gradual threat. Rights that were once seen as fundamental pillars of our freedom are being quietly taken away, piece by piece, in various aspects of our lives. From the suppression of freedom of speech during council meetings, to trespass notices being given to ordinary citizens for not obeying orders and/or for posting their dissenting views or disdain for certain politicians on social media should not be taken lightly. There is also the consolidation of power in the hands of a few and a matter of profound apprehension that the word “racism” is being misused to unjustly label and stigmatize individuals who hold differing opinions or dissenting views. With these in mind, to only name a few, I feel our democracy is slowly succumbing to a dangerous erosion. One of the most alarming signs of the slow death of democracy is the suppression of freedom of speech, particularly in council meetings and other government institutions like our schools. More and more, we are seeing Pickering citizens having their voices stifled, their concerns dismissed, and their right to express opinions restricted. This censorship is a direct attack on the principles that underpin a democratic society, where open dialogue and discourse should be encouraged, not suppressed. By silencing these dissenting voices, those in power seek to manipulate the narrative and maintain control, undermining the very essence of democracy. You may ask yourself how does one suppress these dissenting voices. By unjustly attacking those who do not conform to a specific narrative by calling them names like racist, bigot, white supremacist, conspiracy theorist, or misogynist. Or simply by turning off their microphone during school meetings or council meetings and then falsely bringing forward allegations to an Integrity commissioner, or filing a complaint against the divergent at their place of business. Not to mention cyberbullying or online mocking. Ultimately, these tactics instill fear in others, preventing them from speaking up and expressing their opinions or raising concerns. Another concerning aspect of the erosion of democracy is the increasing consolidation of power in the hands of a select few. Using the Corporation of the City of Pickering as an example, there has been a shift in the power dynamics where the CAO is gradually gaining more and more authority that was previously held by the council. With the heightened authority of the CAO and the new establishment of strong mayoral powers, these two positions possess the capacity to effectively manage the city without extensive public engagement or reliance on the council in certain instances. This has already been demonstrated in many occurrences, including the exclusion of the Council’s participation in drafting the 2024 budget. While the concept of a strong mayor power may appear appealing on the surface to some, it risks undermining the checks and balances necessary for a healthy democracy. I have spoken in council on many occasions about how the concentration of power in the hands of a single individual limits the voices and perspectives of the very ones who should be helping in shaping the decision-making process. Unfortunately, my pleas fell on deaf ears, and now we are beginning to see the potential for authoritarian tendencies. This gradual erosion of power from the people to a few powerful figures usually goes unnoticed unless you are paying close attention to each move being played on the political chessboard. I for one do not believe in coincidences, so I encourage each and every one of you to watch the game very closely as each move is meticulously calculated, foreseeing at least three steps ahead. Even the implementation of Bylaws needs to be followed closely as they too are implemented at an early stage of the game, emphasizing the potential threats they pose to democratic values such as fair representation and transparent accountability. These strategic moves pose grave threats to democratic ideals. Even the noble fight against racism has been weaponized to stifle freedom of expression. Genuine efforts to combat racism have been hijacked, with dissenting opinions being labeled as, yes you guessed it, racist, bigot, or any other discriminatory flavour of the month. While it is crucial to address systemic injustices, it is equally important to ensure that our freedom of expression is protected. The misapplication of anti-racism measures to suppress differing viewpoints undermines the democratic principles of open debate and intellectual diversity. It is essential to strike a balance between addressing racism and safeguarding the right to hold and express diverse opinions. The slow death of democracy is occurring right before our eyes, in seemingly inconspicuous ways. The suppression of freedom of speech, the concentration of power, and the misuse of anti-racism measures are all contributing to this concerning trend. It is crucial for the citizens of Pickering and beyond to remain vigilant and vocal in defense of our democratic values. We must demand transparency, accountability, and the preservation of our fundamental rights from our governments and institutions. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED

Tahir Khorasanee, LL.M. Senior Associate, Steinbergs LLP The adage "justice delayed is justice denied" rings true, but beyond notions of fairness lies a realm of profound economic implications. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the Landlord and Tenant Board, where adjournments and delays can wield significant impact, particularly upon small-scale landlords, especially amid periods of heightened interest rates, inflation, and economic downturns. Ever wondered about the true cost of delays in our justice system? Brace yourself, because it's not just a matter of time. Picture this: almost half of all Canadians, over 18, find themselves tangled in at least one legal snafu within a mere three-year span. Despite this, many of us feel like strangers to the legal labyrinth, left out in the cold. But here's the kicker: legal hiccups are inevitable—they'll knock on your door sooner or later. And let me tell you, they come with a hefty price tag. These legal tangles don't just drain our wallets; they put a strain on our entire economy. Take, for instance, the chilling fact that every extra year spent resolving private disputes can send our growth rate spiraling downwards. So, when it comes to the cost of legal delays, it's not just a number—it's the very pulse of our economy that's at stake. Enter the Landlord and Tenant Board of Ontario, tasked with arbitrating disputes between property owners and tenants—an institution marred by excruciatingly prolonged delays. A recent ombudsman report laid bare the staggering backlog of over 38,000 pending cases, with landlords lodging nearly 90% of the grievances. These delays wield dire consequences, particularly for small-scale landlords. Small landlords, often owning just one or two rental properties, can be particularly affected by these delays. When tenants fail to pay rent or violate lease agreements, landlords must turn to the Landlord and Tenant Board for resolution. However, the long waiting times for hearings can lead to significant financial strain for landlords. For instance, one landlord reported that his tenants paid the first and last month’s rent to move in and immediately refused to pay rent, demanding cash for keys. Another reported becoming homeless so she could continue to pay the mortgage as her tenants refused to pay rent. There are numerous other stories of tenants destroying the landlord’s property, making it inhabitable, while the Landlord and Tenant Board continued to grant these tenants more time. Once the Landlord and Tenant Board makes an order for eviction and unpaid rent, which is often done after several attendances and significant delays, that is not the end of the road for the landlord, who must then pay additional legal and administrative fees to request the Sherif’s office to evict the tenant and later, pay additional legal and court fees to enforce the judgement at the Small Claims Court. In essence, the burden of tackling the housing crisis is disproportionately shouldered by small landlords—individuals who invest a lifetime's savings in pursuit of a modest retirement strategy. This predicament is further exacerbated during periods of economic turbulence, where soaring interest rates and inflation inflate borrowing and living costs, exacerbating financial strain. It seems the current landlord and tenant regime downloads the responsibility of addressing the housing crisis on the small landlord, who spends a lifetime scrouging to save just enough to purchase an investment property as part of his retirement strategy. This situation is exacerbated in times of high interest rates and inflation. These economic conditions increase the cost of borrowing and the cost of living, putting additional financial pressure on small landlords. For most landlords, the Landlord and Tenant Tribunal only exasperates the problem. The Tribunal takes far too long to evict tenants who refuse to pay rent, destroy the property in the process, and refuse to leave without being paid a hefty sum. Something must be done about this – perhaps a good start will be if all landlords refuse to pay cash for keys and go the distance, getting an order for eviction and unpaid rent and later enforcing it in court to make sure the tenants pays their dues. This may be the catalyst needed for meaningful reform, which is long overdue. In a time of economic recession, the impact of justice delays at the Landlord and Tenant Board is more pronounced. It is crucial to address these delays to support small landlords who are an integral part of the housing market and the broader economy. As we navigate these challenging economic times, ensuring timely access to justice is not just a matter of fairness – it is an economic imperative.

100 YEARS AND WE STILL CAN’T GET IT RIGHT...

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - It has been 100 years. It should be a time to rejoice on how great our City has become. All the accomplishments and all the great people living within our city. A time to acknowledge all the great talent. Instead, our city is in peril. We have never faced such poor living conditions. Such high taxes and such poor quality of life. People living on the streets. Open use of drugs. Our downtown a shamble. Our municipal government is obsolete. We do not elect on merit or accomplishments. We have a council that is played by staff to their every whim. Councillors rule of thumb is do nothing and you be elected next election. Look at the last election. Look at what took place this past week. The mayor, council and his chosen staff decided to host a 100th anniversary event at the Regent Theatre. No advertising. No promotion. Just friends of the Mayor, his chosen staff. To ad insult to injury. Mayor Carter announces the erection of a 100th anniversary sign in front of City Hall. Another white elephant. A sign that says nothing... non informative. Just the number 100. This sign according to the City was paid by staff. The city is yet to confirm cost and or who really paid for the sign. The City in it’s arrogance had deemed the City as not having a newspaper. An insult to every downtown merchant and every business person outside of the Chamber of Commerce good old boys club. Not to mention the Durham Realty. A testament to the corrupt mentality. How dare they deem the city without a newspaper, when we been serving the City and Region for over 29 years.... We do not bow to the Good Old Boys mentality. We bring a service of delivering news. This is the same city that paid with your tax dollars to magazines like SNAP, The Express. All Good Old Boys club members... I feel for our founding fathers... This is not the Oshawa they wanted for future generations. A council made up of retiree's that are only in it to fluff up pension. Realtors, that are enjoying the taxpayers extra cash. The un-employable... people that out of office. No one would hire them to clean floors. A musician dead beat. A man that is supposed to be in charge of the downtown core... A pretty boy has been third rate actor/teacher/self professed artist. To be fair. Amongst the hay stack there is one lawyer. From the bunch, I feel the lawyer has the most potential but is kept in a dark room at city hall. As he is the only real threat to real thought and opinion. Sad that the Mayor would have used your tax dollar to create a pre-elections photo opportunity to better his political position in he community. I wonder if his actions are not against the Ontario Elections Act. After all. The 100th rendezvous was kept pretty much quiet and circulated among his supporters. I feel for future generations as we are not going forward to a better place. We are going back to the old wild wild west. Days people feared walking downtown or wondering due to fear off all kinds of unknown dangers. Happy 100th Oshawa.

The economy, the working class and the upcoming federal budget

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East The Trudeau government will table its next budget on April 16, 2024. So it is time to take another look at what they intend or should do to redress our country’s economy, stop waste, and really look after the interests of the country and its citizens. Since first elected, the Trudeau government has escalated spending on new or expanded programs and services, financing it through government debt. From 2014/15 to 2022/23, the government increased annual program spending by approximately 75 per cent. If we adjust for population growth and inflation, the Trudeau government has recorded the five-highest years of per-person spending in Canadian history. All of this new spending has resulted in eight consecutive budget deficits under Prime Minister Trudeau, with six more projected until 2028/29. These deficits have contributed to an $867.2 billion increase in gross federal debt from 2014/15 to 2022/23. The federal government plans to spend more taxpayer dollars on debt interest ($46.5 billion) in 2023/24 than on child-care benefits ($31.2 billion). As a result, future generations will have to pay off a debt burden that’s nearly double what it was when Prime Minister Trudeau was elected in 2015. Let us face the crude reality. As the economic growth crisis deepens, the standard of living worsens. More to the point, the economy is now growing slower than the population, which is why per capita GDP is falling. The latest figures from Statistics Canada confirm that Canada suffered yet another decline in per capita GDP in the fourth quarter of 2023: the fifth decline in the past six quarters, the worst sustained drop in more than 30 years. Per capita GDP, after adjusting for inflation, is now below where it was in the fourth quarter of 2014, nine years ago. That has left living standards worse in the fourth quarter of 2023 than they were at the end of 2014. The result is an end to the belief that we are among the richest countries in the world. From placing sixth among OECD countries in GDP per capita in 1981, we have fallen to 15th place in 2022. We have been surpassed by countries like Ireland, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden, Iceland, Australia, Germany, Belgium and Finland, who used to be poorer than we were. So what can we expect without a radical change in government policies; change the political class does not seem ready to even consider? Unless we find a solution quickly the economy will continue to shrink, and living standards will not be all that suffers. Everything they represent will suffer. A society that cannot look forward to a future of rising living standards is one that is deprived of one of the primary motivating forces of human behaviour – hope. Without the universal lubricant of growth, all of the divisions within a society – between the classes, between the generations, between sexes and races and regions – are likely to be more inflamed. What makes this especially depressing is that it is almost never discussed in our politics. Party leaders hammer away at each other over growth in the short term, though they can do very little to alter it. Long-term growth, which is more responsive to policy, barely rates a mention. What they think about the future of Canada is probably the farthest thing from their mind as they look for grab an illusive and short-lived imaginary power. For all the fruitless debates about macroeconomic stabilization policy, and which form of stimulus is most effective at raising growth in the short term, the long-term growth trajectory is blindly ignored. Yet it is the long-term growth of an economy that is really responsive to policy. Another major problem Canada continues to ignore is our alarming drop in productivity, which is closely connected to the extraordinary decline of business investment in Canada. Simply put, our workers are less productive than other countries’ workers because they have less capital to work with. Therefore, getting our investment rates up is obviously part of the solution. It matters, however, what you invest in, as much as how much you invest. The current trend in disaggregate and chaotic investment it is very troubling. While business investment in residential structures has roughly doubled as a percentage of GDP since 2000, investment in machinery and equipment has roughly halved, with our manufacturing industries destroyed to the benefit of other countries. Could this go some way towards explaining why our relative growth in productivity has fallen off so sharply since 2000? Have we been so busy capitalizing on rising housing prices that we have neglected to invest in the sorts of things that make it possible to afford a house? Over the last thirty years, manufacturing jobs have constituted a declining share of working-class employment. This is true even among men, for whom manufacturing employment went from a high of 20 percent of working-class jobs to only 13 percent today. Among women, manufacturing represents only 6 percent of working-class jobs. Conversely, jobs in sales and services have grown significantly over the same period. Today, almost half of the working class is employed in sales/service jobs. Among working-class women, it accounts for more than half. The trades continue to be an important part of working-class employment, but not skilled tradespeople with formal training, as was formerly the case. Today, it is mostly helpers and labourers who fall into the working class. Notably, immigrants are much more likely to find themselves in the working class than other Canadians, due to ancient and restrictive professional trade laws. Census data show that the longer an immigrant has been in Canada, the less likely he or she is a member of the working class. Fifty percent of immigrants who arrived in the previous five years found themselves in the working class, whereas only 34 percent—equivalent to the national average—of immigrants in Canada longer than 35 years did. In short, a member of this newly defined working class, is just as likely to be female, most likely working in sales or the service industry, and highly likely to be a recent immigrant. So major policy changes on housing, immigration, childcare, and education would show that our politicians are attuned to changing working-class dynamics and ready to fulfill the vision of a multi-ethnic, working-class coalition for the twenty-first century. Effective policies could help them enter the coveted and widely touted middle class; one that seems to be in decline at present, rather than on the rise. In conclusion, let us see what the visionaries of this year’s budget intend to bring to Canadians. “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.” – Albert Einstein.

17.31 REASONS

By Rosaldo Russo Allow me to begin this column by thanking the Oshawa/Central newspaper for allowing me the opportunity and access to the press. Not to many if any allow an average person like me to tell the world what I see and think. In my opinion. The Editor/Publisher is a real upstanding type of guy. He shoots from the hip and hold traditional core values. My name is Rosaldo Russo. I came to this great country to make a better life for myself and my family. I thank Canada for everything it has allowed me to do and earn. I worked construction all my life. I know the value of hard work and honesty. I remember as a boy my father always telling me to work hard and buy land. So I did. I remember days when I did not have enough to eat. I go to work... but I did not wait for hand outs. I rounded up my pride my skill and my determination to succeed and went to work. In those days the only benefits we received was the fact we were employed. Before retiring I was the owner and operator of local material supply company that allowed me to retired without worry. Now that I have time to enjoy life. I look around me and have some concern for future generations. I see that the world is finished. Did you hear the great news.... The government is increasing the minimum wage to $17.31... wow... how generous. Are the crazy or what? Who can survive making $17.31 an hour. Do the math on a 40 hour week. You barely make to pay rent. Forget food. Gas, insurance and utilities. How is it that Justin can send a 10 million dollar target...oops I mean tank to fight someone else's war in the Ukraine. Yet, our own people right here at home are starving and suffering even more than those at war. At the least those at war know it is war and tough times are a coming. But here in Canada. We live like we are in war. A war, against our own stupidity. Now don’t get me wrong. I am not professing that all and everyone get a free ride. As some have become generational system suckers. People that have no drive to do anything or contribute anything...and sit by the mailbox waiting for the cheque to come in. I don’t mean those. I mean the poor guy that just got married. The guy that wants to start a family but due to economics can’t. I once asked an uncle. Uncle, Vinnie. Why is it you only had one child. He looked at me in the face and said. I did not want to bring someone to this world to suffer. I could only afford one child and I loved him and tried to give them the best I could muster. His words echo in my heart every time I see a young person. When I hear of the government pulling this kind of shit. Announcing $17.31 as some great feat. It makes my blood boil. It makes me ashamed of being Canadian. I remember when I came to this country. I denounced my home and native land. I pledged that if I ever was called to serve that I give my life for my government. Today, no much so as I would not give it for my government. Instead I would give it fighting my governments policy and agenda. Come on let’s call the election and bring back pride and integrity to this nation. God forbid you all vote Justin back in. God forbid.

ON BABY

o

By Dale Jodoin In the world's big problem with drugs like crack, meth, and heroin, there's a sad story that doesn't get told much. It's about the smallest victims, babies, who are born into a life of struggle because their moms were caught in the grip of addiction. Back in the '70s, hospitals were filled with the cries of babies who, right from birth, were fighting against the drugs they were exposed to in their mom's womb. These babies couldn’t stop crying because they were feeling the harsh pain of withdrawal. Fast forward to today, and sadly, this is still happening. More babies are being born facing this tough battle, and it doesn't seem to be getting better. People are trying to fix the drug problem by giving addicts clean needles and safe places to use drugs, aiming to reduce harm. But what about these tiny babies? They start life in a really tough spot, craving drugs they never chose to take. How do you help a newborn baby who’s suffering like this? Statistics show how big this problem is. For example, in the United States, the number of babies born withdrawing from drugs, a condition called neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), went up a lot between 2000 and 2012. This means thousands of babies start life in pain each year because of drug addiction. These little ones don’t just cry more; they have a hard start in life that can affect them forever. They didn’t choose this, and it's not fair. They are paying the price for a problem they had no part in creating. We often talk about helping drug addicts but forget about these babies. They and their moms need our help too. It's not just about today's drug problem. If we don’t do something, the next generation will suffer too. These babies grow up, and their rough start can lead to more problems later in life. This sad situation should make us think and want to do something. If you see a pregnant woman struggling with addiction, it's a chance to help not just her but also her baby. We need to push for more support for these women and their children. They need care, love, and help to break free from the cycle of addiction. In the end, while there are no easy answers, we must try harder to help these innocent babies. They deserve a chance at a better life, free from the pain and problems of drugs. Let’s not forget about them. They need us to speak up and help make a change.

An Assignment: The New Norm for Job Applicants. Why?

By Nick Kossovan Many job seekers spend their time and energy focusing on job searching factors beyond their control, namely how an employer designed their hiring process. Regular readers of this column know I stress the truism that employers own their hiring process, not the job seeker. Hence, rather than criticizing an employer's hiring process, job seekers should work with it. Criticism or wishful thinking won't get you hired. The latest complaint: Employers are increasingly asking candidates to complete an assignment. This ask isn't new. Early in my career, I applied for a technical writer position to write instruction manuals for the employer's line of software. After the initial interview, I was asked to write instructions, following the company's internal style guide, consisting of a maximum of eight steps on anything. (e.g., a recipe, changing a tire, repotting a plant) The employer's ask made sense. They wanted to evaluate my methodical thought process and ability to write comprehensive instructions. I gladly did the assignment. (No, I didn't get the job.) There's obvious merit in asking candidates vying for a position that involves writing, delivering presentations, or analyzing data to complete an assignment. However, candidates are increasingly being asked to complete an assignment for a broader range of jobs; why? Answer: In recent years, there's been an uptick in the number of fraudulent candidates populating the job market. A recent Forbes article headline: 70% Of Workers Lie On Resumes, New Study Shows. Consider what 70% means from the hiring manager's perspective. Essentially, 70% indicates the likelihood that the candidate the hiring manager is interviewing is likely to be lying or exaggerating about some aspect of their background. Hence, understandably, employers are taking longer to hire due to their increased diligence in weeding out fraudulent candidates. There are many reasons a person lies on their resume. The most common, in my opinion: 1. Desperate need of a job. 2. Believe they'll get away with their lies. 3. Too lazy to do the work to obtain the required education, skills and experience, and 4. Feel entitled to "success shortcuts.” There's no justifiable reason to lie on your resume, LinkedIn profile, or at any time throughout an employer's hiring process. However, as the Forbes article points out, many people's moral compass tells them it's okay to lie to employers; thus, lying on resumes, and it can be assumed LinkedIn profiles, is common. Sadly, this practice of lying is detrimental to job seekers who present honest and transparent resumes. They're competing against fraudulent candidates who, unjust as the reality is, have a greater chance of being selected for an interview because their lies and exaggerations make them more appealing. Employers are catching on that the [insert position] they hired several months ago, who regurgitated current buzzwords, exhibited just the right amount of boastfulness, just south of being arrogant, and bragged of past successes, implying they'd do the same for the employer, was all talk. As a result of such bad hires, employers are increasingly asking candidates to complete an assignment. Employers understand an assignment isn't foolproof due diligence. The candidate can still use AI, seek help from friends, submit someone else's work, etc. Even so, requiring candidates to complete an assignment as a due diligence step is better than nothing. After empathizing with the reason(s) why an employer makes completing an assignment part of their hiring process, the question becomes: Should you spend unpaid time doing the assignment? The argument that candidates are exploited by not being paid for their time is mute since the assignment is voluntary. Additionally, I've yet to be presented with solid evidence that employers are using work created by candidates. Obviously, there's no definitive yes or no answer other than you should only do an assignment if you see it as an opportunity to demonstrate your capabilities. To be competitive with other candidates doing the same assignment, you must give 100%. One time, I had a candidate offer to do an assignment. She strategically created an opportunity to demonstrate her skills by offering to analyze and write a recommendation report based on six months' data. Impressed by her proactiveness, I took her up on her offer and ended up hiring her. (This is how you compete in today's job market.) An assignment allows the employer to assess a candidate in four ways: 1. Are they the real deal? 2. Are they genuinely interested in the position? 3. How will they tailor projects to support their brand? 4. Work ethic: Are they fully committed to tasks, or just do the minimum? When you accept an assignment, make sure you: 1. Understand the purpose of the assignment and what skills are being evaluated. 2. Know the deadline, format, length, and mediums you can use. (Don't assume!) 3. You own your work. Don't view being asked to do an assignment as a dichotomy between your feelings about the employer's request and you wanting the job. The yin-yang is simple: Either you want the job or don't. Either you respect the employer's right to design their hiring processes as they see fit, or you don't. Because job seekers don't control the hiring process, no grey area exists. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

BY A NOSE

By A Nose from Wayne & Tamara My behavior and emotions make no sense to me. I have a wonderful boyfriend. At first I admit I was not fully attracted to him. At the time I was hung up on dating gorgeous men that in the end brought me nothing but a pretty face. But the more time I spent with my boyfriend, the more I realized how compatible we are. My friends and family love him. We are a great couple and share similar views on life. We laugh together and play together. He is ambitious, mature, and so sweet you can see the goodness in his heart by his eyes. In bed we have amazing chemistry. He is sensual and gentle, which is what I love and have at last found. One thing perplexes me: I cannot accept his large and long nose. I know it sounds crazy. This one imperfection of his keeps me from fully saying yes and concluding he is the perfect guy for me to marry. I've told him this, and he mostly laughs it off. He even makes fun of his own nose. I used to have a long nose myself, but not anymore. Could this be the insecurities I felt as an unattractive child? When I am with him, I am fully in love and forget about his nose. When he is gone, all these nagging doubts begin. Joyce Joyce, there are two versions of the Cyrano de Bergerac story: the original play by Edmond Rostand, and the movie version starring Steve Martin. In both stories, Cyrano fears rejection by the woman he loves because of his large nose. Rostand's play ends unhappily, but Martin's movie shows love triumphant. Unlike the Cyrano story, your boyfriend's nose is not a problem for him. It is a problem for you. You are doing to him what was done to you as a child. Others made you feel unattractive, and that is how you feel about him. Is being with him like wearing an ugly sweater? Do you obsess about what your children wouldlook like? We are not judging you based on this aspect of your personality, but you haven't met someone you love so much that the outside package doesn't matter. Love causes us to see the world through different eyes. Until that happens, your relationships may resemble the Rostand story, not Steve Martin's. Tamara Eight Million Stories I recently married. Prior to getting serious, I told my husband about my not so spotless past, giving him the opportunity to bow out. He said my past didn't matter. He didn't, however, return the favor. After we married, the official who denied his driver's license reinstatement told me he has not one, but seven alcohol related arrests. My husband vehemently denies he has a substance abuse problem, but he took 120 pain pills in a week's time. See a pattern? He accuses me of infidelity, which is impossible because he hardly ever lets me out of his sight. He's gone so far as to accuse me of poisoning our dog against him. To top off everything else, despite my parents helping us pay the bills, he recently bought a weekend at a time-share resort. I feel I've been fighting single-handedly for our marriage. Will this man ever live in reality? Mia Mia, the crime show "Naked City" ended each episode with the same tag line: "There are eight million stories in the Naked City. This has been one of them." Most of the shows ended on a melancholy note with people wishing things hadn't happened as they did. Your husband committed a crime against you: fraud. He was impersonating someone you could love. At the end of each "Naked City" episode, people dealt with the aftermath of what was done to them and moved on with their lives. Like everyone else in the Naked City, you should, too. Wayne SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

MENOPAUSE

from Menopause? By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford There’s a universal fact for women. If they live long enough, their capacity to bring forth children will end, and they will become menopausal. Menopause can be when the thermostat becomes their most prized possession. But not all women have hot flashes. Some go through this period wondering why they have no symptoms. The best advice for them is, “Enjoy the smooth sailing!” Other women endure needless suffering. There are treatments, and these women should see their doctors. The medical journal, The Lancet, has urged women to become educated about hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Menopause should not be considered a disease. It is a natural process. Be cautious with commercial interests of pharmaceutical companies’ propaganda. Seek information from a medical specialist. The authors of the Lancet report stress they are not opposed to HRT as it can be effective in treating hot flashes, vaginal dryness, and genital urinary symptoms. Many years ago, HRT was often used by women to control menopausal symptoms. The standard treatment involved the hormones estrogen and progestin, a synthetic form of progesterone. But a large and widely publicised study called the Women’s Health Initiative identified problems with HRT. Doctors and patients concluded HRT was dangerous and this misconception lingers today. The study had significant shortcomings however, and subsequent studies have more nuanced conclusions. For women under 60, or for those less than a decade out of menopause, the benefits of HRT in fighting debilitating symptoms outweighed the risk. There was one other caution. Those using HRT should not have a family history of stroke, breast cancer, or coronary heart disease. Which women suffer the most from menopause? It’s those who are affected by severe symptoms. Imagine a stalwart high school principal. She has handled the tough job for years. But with the onset of menopause, the slighted provocation has her bursting into tears behind closed doors. For the first time, she feels incapable of the task. If she meets the criteria mentioned above, then she is a textbook case for HRT. Within a week, her problem would be history. Menopause is not just one event or one symptom, such as hot flashes. A gradual decrease in the production of estrogen influences organs such as the vagina and urinary bladder. It’s these organs that women are loath to discuss with their family doctor, to say nothing of their partners. It may come as a shock to younger people to know that seniors have sexual relations. But menopause can make vaginal tissues thinner and more easily irritated. Past columns have tried to explain this with a touch of eloquence, noting that it’s hard for females to sing with a sore throat. Put plainly, it’s hard for menopausal and post-menopausal women to enjoy sex with an inflamed vagina (atrophic vaginitis). Sometimes neither the woman nor her partner knows what’s causing the severe pain. Unfortunately, many women suffer silently. Those who ask for help will find there are good remedies. Something as simple as an estrogen cream can resolve an irritated vagina within two weeks. Other consequences of menopause, like the accelerated loss of bone density, may also be treated with HRT. Sometimes problems are missed because a vaginal examination is not done during a check up. Or patients don’t mention issues to the doctor. The comedian, Joan Rivers, made a joke about news that having a dog makes you ten years younger. “My first thought was to rescue two more,” she said, before adding, “but I don’t want to go through menopause again.” Today, women can and should get their symptoms treated. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Political suppression is a dirty game

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor In a democratic society, the suppression of opposing political views is not only immature but it undermines the principles of democracy. We see it more and more each day how politicians are using their power to silence dissenting voices and manipulate certain narratives. Persistently engaging in a game of dirty politics, eroding the integrity of the democratic process. The longer we allow this dirty game to continue, the more we risk creating an authoritarian environment, that stifles open dialogue and debate which is your right as a Canadian. By now we have all witnessed politicians, at all levels of government who are so driven by their desire to maintain control, resort to abusing their power by taking fellow politicians with opposing views to the integrity commissioner or other authorities. This manipulative tactic aims to silence critics through sanctions and penalties, wasting taxpayers' money in the process. Such actions divert resources from addressing pressing issues that affect the public, highlighting a disregard for the responsibilities entrusted to them. Politicians who engage in suppressing opposing views often resort to manipulating words and context to control the narrative. They selectively highlight certain statements while ignoring the broader context, aiming to discredit their opponents and their character. This manipulation of information not only distorts the truth but also creates a false narrative that serves their own interests. Such immature tactics undermine the transparency and honesty that are vital to a functioning democracy. By suppressing opposing views, politicians undermine the democratic process itself. Democracy thrives on the exchange of ideas, open debates, and the active participation of citizens. When politicians silence dissenting voices, they limit the diversity of perspectives necessary for informed decision-making. This erosion of democratic values weakens the trust of the electorate and damages the very foundation of a democratic society. Citizens vote for politicians based on their promises to represent their interests and concerns. When politicians use their power to silence dissent, they disregard the voices of those who elected them. This breach of trust is nothing short of betrayal to the electorate and erodes the democratic legitimacy of elected officials. Fostering disillusionment among the public. When politicians resort to suppressing opposing views, they create a culture of fear and intimidation. This not only hinders the free expression of ideas but also discourages individuals from participating in the political process. A healthy democracy relies on active civic engagement, where citizens feel safe to voice their opinions and contribute to the decision-making process. It is crucial to hold politicians accountable for their actions, demand transparency, and promote an open and inclusive political debate. True leaders understand the value of open honest dialogue and debate. They have the skills to participate in and open themselves up to the power of constructive criticism. So for all those Politicians who are not mature enough to play nice on the political chessboard, may I suggest you move over and let someone else show you how to play the game with honesty and integrity. Everyone deserves the right to be heard. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"