Do We Need to Live with Frequent Pandemics?

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford A pandemic, the rapid spread of infectious disease worldwide, is supposed to be a rare thing, right? In the 20th Century, we went decades without such problems. But was COVID-19 the beginning of more frequent unwelcome viral visitors? How attentive do we need to be to warnings of new viral diseases with different names? The World Health Organization has declared the latest outbreak of Mpox to be a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” It’s hard to tell if that means “Now listen here, get ready for another wallop,” or if we can safely go about our business with hope all will be well enough. Given the WHO issued the same alert about an Mpox outbreak in July 2022, and then lifted the alarm in May 2023, one wonders if issuing warnings has the unintended consequence of fueling complacency. But if Mpox becomes another pandemic, let’s pray that health authorities do not repeat the same tragic error. They must not completely shut down our society and the economy. We know how to adopt sound hygienic measures and that vaccines can be effective. We have yet to learn, however, that most people could do more to protect themselves against viral infections by taking common sense approaches to protect themselves. For one example, it's stark negligence that health authorities don’t advocate more clearly about what people can do to build up and maintain stronger immune systems. Now, it appears that a new strain of Mpox will test our fortitude. Experts say the new variant made its initial outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Then a traveller probably carried the virus to Europe, where Sweden reported a case of Mpox. What should you know about Mpox? Infectious disease experts say it’s a close relative of the smallpox virus and that there are two different types, called clade I and clade II, the latter of which was responsible for the outbreak in 2022. Clade I causes the most serious symptoms and is responsible for a higher rate of deaths. And this is the strain that is presently on the move. What are the symptoms of Mpox? Initially, it presents similar to a common cold. But then a raised rash appears on the face, mouth, hands, legs, feet, or the genitals, easy to confuse with measles or chickenpox. Anyone in close physical contact with another person who has contracted Mpox is at risk. Contact with bedsheets or clothes of an infected person also enable transfer of the virus. Experts say there is an incubation period ranging from 3-21 days before symptoms appear. Are we going to see a running count of new cases reported on the nightly news? It’s only a matter of time before all countries report more cases. Fortunately, there are vaccines. The Mpox virus is closely related to the smallpox virus and existing vaccines for smallpox are proving effective in preventing infection from each of the strains of Mpox. That’s good news. But keep in mind, these vaccines are for prevention, and if the spread of disease is faster than the production of vaccine, we will have another problem. For now, only those people who are at risk of exposure are advised to get vaccinated. How can people protect themselves when the disease is spreading globally? To start, be careful about that lengthy incubation period when symptoms are absent but close contact can transmit the virus. Stay loyal to one sexual partner. Demand the same in return. Warnings about viral pandemics are not the time for playing around. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Jesus Was a Tradesperson

By Murray Strong Compulsory Certification is the answer Compulsory Certification is the answer. $260,000,000.00 more to set up training in the Skills Development Fund (SDF). Nice mone. I believe the total invested in this group is $1,400,000,000.00 since 2021. My opinion is we need more action and less talk. The SDF offers funding to organizations for innovative projects that address challenges to hiring, training or retaining workers including apprentices to drive Ontario’s economic growth. My question to Premier Ford is where is the other $260,000,000.00 from the employers? I have heard all the hard luck stories about the cost to train a Canadian citizen. Everyone in Canada knows we need 3.5 million new homes and another 500,000 new citizen’s arriving and looking for somewhere to live. The government believes it can entice foreign skilled trades to come to Canada and work for less money. BC is trying this crazy idea. A company wants to bring in cheap labor . A foreign citizen wants to get into Canada to live. The company tells government this new employee is a superstar. New employee owes his life to the employer. New employee works for half the normal wage rate. Canadian citizens walk away from the trades because the wages are driven down. Employer gets rich. Sweet deal. Alberta is years ahead of Ontario in skilled training. They know the importance to treating skilled trades with respect. Construction Ontario Training and Resource Centre states carpenters are the back bone of construction projects as the housing market continue to boom, skilled carpenters adept at both traditional and modern construction methods are in high demand . Number two behind electricians. The public should know Ontario has 140 skilled trades but only 23 are important . The rest are just common workers. Trailer trash. Jesus wants justice for carpenters. Add to the 23 like Alberta has done. Maybe God will forgive your insult to his family. Thank you. Denny Crane

Bring Your Tax Dollars Home: A Call for Fairness in Canadian Tax Spending

By Dale Jodoin In today's world, Canada is known for its fairness and generosity. We pride ourselves on welcoming people from all corners of the globe, whether they come here legally or are seeking refuge. But with all the good that we do, it's important to take a closer look at how we spend our tax dollars, especially when billions of those dollars are leaving the country each year. Could we be doing more with that money right here at home? This article explores the idea of keeping more of our tax dollars in Canada, making them work harder for everyone, including the newcomers who arrive on our shores. The Outflow of Canadian Tax Dollars Every year, Canada sends billions of dollars abroad in the form of foreign aid, international development projects, and contributions to global organizations. In 2023, Canada's official development assistance (ODA) alone amounted to approximately $6.6 billion. This money is intended to help developing countries with things like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. It’s part of our commitment to being a responsible global citizen. But while we're sending all this money overseas, we're also seeing a growing number of people coming to Canada from many of these same countries. Some come seeking better opportunities, while others are fleeing conflict and persecution. According to the 2023 immigration statistics, over 400,000 people immigrated to Canada legally, and thousands more arrived as refugees or claimed asylum. These new Canadians contribute to our economy and enrich our communities, but they also need support—housing, healthcare, education, and jobs. The Case for Keeping More Money in Canada Given these numbers, one has to wonder: would it not be better if we kept more of our tax dollars here at home? Couldn’t we use that money to improve the services that Canadians rely on every day? Imagine if a portion of the billions we send abroad were invested in affordable housing, healthcare, and education right here in Canada. These investments would benefit all Canadians, including the newcomers who come here seeking a better life. For instance, consider the issue of affordable housing. According to the Canadian Housing and Mortgage Corporation (CMHC), over 1.6 million Canadian households are in "core housing need," meaning they spend more than 30% of their income on housing that may not even meet basic standards of adequacy or suitability. If we redirected just a fraction of our foreign aid budget to building affordable housing, we could significantly reduce this number and ensure that everyone, including new immigrants and refugees, has a safe and affordable place to live. Similarly, our healthcare system is under strain. With an aging population and increasing demands on services, many Canadians are facing longer wait times for surgeries and other medical procedures. In 2023, the average wait time for medically necessary treatment was over 22 weeks, according to the Fraser Institute. If more of our tax dollars were kept in Canada, we could invest in reducing these wait times, ensuring that everyone gets the care they need when they need it. Balancing Global Responsibility with National Needs Now, it's important to be clear: this isn't about turning our backs on the rest of the world. Canada has a long history of helping those in need, and that shouldn't change. But there is a balance to be struck between our global responsibilities and the needs of our own citizens. We need to ask ourselves if our current spending priorities are the best way to achieve that balance. Are we doing enough to ensure that our tax dollars are being used efficiently and effectively? Could we achieve the same humanitarian goals by focusing more on domestic projects that also benefit our global commitments? For example, instead of sending money abroad to build schools in other countries, why not focus on improving education here at home, and then offering scholarships or exchange programs to students from those countries? This way, we’re still contributing to global education while also strengthening our own educational institutions. Supporting Newcomers with Canadian Tax Dollars It's also worth considering how these changes could benefit the very people we aim to help with our foreign aid. Many immigrants and refugees come from countries that receive Canadian aid, but once they arrive here, they face the same challenges as other Canadians—finding affordable housing, accessing healthcare, and securing good jobs. By keeping more of our tax dollars in Canada, we could provide better support for these newcomers. We could ensure that they have access to the services they need to thrive in their new home. This, in turn, would help them contribute more fully to our economy and society. For instance, the government could use the money to expand programs that help newcomers integrate into Canadian society, such as language classes, job training, and settlement services. These programs are essential for helping immigrants and refugees become self-sufficient and successful members of our community. A Fair Deal for Canadians In conclusion, the idea of keeping more of our tax dollars at home isn't about being selfish or turning away from the world. It's about making sure that our tax dollars are used in the most effective and efficient way possible. It's about ensuring that all Canadians—whether they were born here or came here seeking a better life—have access to the services and opportunities they need to succeed. Canada will always be a country that cares about the world. But we also need to care about our own citizens and ensure that we're getting the best value for our tax dollars. By rethinking how we spend our money, we can build a stronger, fairer Canada for everyone.

SOCIAL MEDIA IS DEAD

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - For the last 30 years. The newspaper industry has gone through some major transformations. I remember the introduction of desk top publishing. When computer first came out. No, one could afford one or knew how to operate one. Most publishing houses still used the old big over head light and wax set ups. The super print shops had electronic presses away from the old mechanical ones. I remember The Central first issue. It was put together by the folks that operated the big old press in Bowmanville. Every time they turned on the press. The whole building would rattle. Since those days. Computers appeared to take over. Those that did not adapt. Went out of business. I remember the Whitby Free Press. An antiquated press. Owners that did not really want to keep publishing. I approached them to buy them out and they would not budge. Today they are gone much like The Oshawa Times, Metroland and a slew of small newspapers that had no real direction or clue on what they were doing. Today, with the internet in every home. The newspaper industry seen it’s final challenge. Everyone predicted without knowing that the internet would replace hard copy. In part it did for a very short while. For the publishers that did not understand the science behind the net. They fell victims of their own ignorance. At the Central. We are experts in the technology. We, were one of two companies that brought the Internet to Durham. We seen the trends and the direction the internet is going. The internet in it’s infancy... was primitive and had limited use. With the introduction of browsers. The internet took a whole new life. Purpose. This is where the commercialization started. The browsers brought about the chats. From that point on. The internet began a bonanza for some and the downfall of the internet. Today, the internet is nothing short of a communications public toilet. From the millions of scams. To the never ending advertising. The internet has become a dangerous, unreliable place. Today, social media appears to be the new way for many municipalities have chosen to post important notices and events. This is in clear contravention of the Ontario Municipal Act. An Act that was set forth to safeguard from municipalities becoming the media and practicing censorship. The original intent of the act was to keep municipalities, accountable and transparent. An arms length away from becoming media. The act is clear in it stipulates that municipalities need to publish public notices in a newspaper that prints at least once a week in the local economy. Many Durham municipalities have confused and or altered the interpretation to only posting online and calling it wrongfully publishing. Leaving that aside. Look at any municipal postings on social media. Look at the comments, likes and or views. Minimal at best. Why? Most people do not go on line to look up notices. Many do not have or can afford the internet or a computer. Many seniors do not know how to navigate social media or very complex web site. Have you ever tried going on any municipal web sites. Impossible to find anything. Social media and the internet will soon transform. You will have to pay for the internet and much like TV channels. You will have to pay for the use of browsers...Commercial/informative/business/science and so on. This will be the death of the internet much like cable TV was the death the open to air broadcasting. Stay tunes.

Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Waste Recycling, Pickering and Durham Region

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East In today’s world our energy needs are constantly increasing, especially our need for electrical energy. Because of that, we need an energy source that is reliable, puts less stress on Nature, and is less challenging to the environment. At this point, we can certainly affirm that nuclear energy is one of these kinds of energy. Moreover, we have the technology, the plants and the science to support it. So let us put Canadian ingenuity to work for Canadians once again. Durham region is a hub of nuclear plants in Pickering and Clarington. So let us capitalize on them and keep them working at their best. In addition, it is high time that Durham region had a serious nuclear science center. We could facilitate and capitalize on the rapid evolution this science is likely to undergo if we work at developing it. Look at the example of the rapid strides made in electronics. In just a few decades we have progressed from the invention of the transistor to the very sophisticated integrated circuits and nanotechnologies which enjoy a broad range of applications in our daily lives today. The relevant question is obvious: why can we not accomplish a similar transformation in the field of nuclear reactors? We see efforts to make electric vehicles with improved battery life, but we do not see any research or ideas on miniaturizing nuclear reactors, for vehicle use for example. Such reactors would certainly be better for powering vehicles that the proposed batteries. This suggestion may seem far-fetched, but there is evidence that it is possible. The first nuclear submarine, for example, was created in the middle of the last century. In the early 1950’s, regardless of the challenges faced in developing and operating brand-new technology, Admiral Rickover and his team did not disappoint. They created a highly reliable nuclear reactor in a form-factor that would fit into a submarine hull with no more than a 28-foot (8.5 m) beam. This became known as the S1W reactor. Nautilus was launched and commissioned with this reactor in 1954. Seventy years have passed and we have not seen further miniaturizations of reactors. Therefore, I say, it is time to do some research in this direction right here in the Durham region. To do that, however, we need vision, political will and expertise, all of which is badly lacking in Canada at this time. Imagine having a car that will run for years without needing a fill up! My thinking may be well ahead of its time, but I hope that the future will vindicate me. Anyway, there are some signs that nuclear energy is in the spot light again, although not for the right reasons. Politicians promoting the use of electrical vehicles have mounted pressure for nuclear energy as an answer to the lack of electrical energy for the electric vehicle project. So now, all levels of politicians who proudly professed the elimination of nuclear power plants in the past, especially those in Pickering, are doing an about-face, praising nuclear energy. Both federal and provincial governments have officially recognized the importance of nuclear energy for meeting climate and energy needs. Even so, development and licensing of a new site can take years. Ontario's electricity demand is rising and refurbishing nuclear plants is a way to meet it cleanly and cost-effectively. The Pickering site, which is ideally positioned to supply the Greater Toronto Area with zero-carbon electricity around the clock, is licensed for over 3,000 MW of nuclear capacity. Then, in a move likely unnoticed by most Ontarians, the province has inched closer to quite a change in energy policy. Witness the City of Pickering, which was posed to fully support the dismantling of the Pickering plant in 2020, is now enthusiastic to refurbish it. What an about face in a few short years, by the same people on Pickering Council! Doesn’t their deep expertise amaze you? Of course, nobody seems to be talking or even thinking about the recycling of spent nuclear fuel at any level of government. They seem oblivious to this national treasure in full view. All the most vociferous so-called experts are ready to burry the spent nuclear fuel. Experts in political science rather than nuclear science, they burry their heads in the proverbial sand when they advocate for burying spent fuel. Today we have the technology to recycle spent fuel, thus reducing its radioactivity and getting far more energy out of it. Over the last decade, my own efforts as an MP and Professional Engineer, an endangered species in the House of Commons in Canada; and especially the efforts of Professor Emeritus Peter Ottensmeyer have been ignored. For the record, Peter Ottensmeyer is Professor Emeritus, past Chair of Medical Biophysics at the University of Toronto, and Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. His educational background is in engineering physics and metallurgy with a postgraduate education in solid state physics and biophysics. The bureaucrats from the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) continue to blindly pursue the idea of burying the spent fuel even thought the Nuclear Fuel Act has a provision for a: “Change in Approach Marginal note: New approach — technical innovation 20 (2) If a new technological method is developed that has been the subject of a scientific and technical review by experts from international governmental organizations that deal with nuclear matters and has received their support, the waste management organization may propose, in its triennial report, a new approach for the management of nuclear fuel waste that is based on that new method.”Isn’t it time for Canada to become a leader in the nuclear field once again, by recycling the spent nuclear fuel rather than burying it? We are sitting on a treasure trove in Pickering, and these clowns call it waste! Apart from legacy hydro dams, Ontario’s nuclear fleet makes the cheapest electricity in the province, while abundant natural fuel and a local supply chain shore up our energy security and economy. With some of the lowest fuel costs of any thermal power plant in the world, revenue from Pickering supports nearly 5,000 high-quality jobs at the plant and thousands more in the surrounding area.The sudden love the Ford government has developed for nuclear energy, despite MPP Peter Bethlenfalvy’s former lack of enthusiasm, is also noted. The Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) is loaning almost a billion dollars to OPG to build the country’s first grid-scale, small modular reactor (SMR) in Clarington, Ontario. In conclusion, now that Ontario has entered its first energy crunch in decades, and refurbishments at Darlington will be wrapping up, the rationale for moving refurbishment workers to Pickering is stronger than ever. My hope is that politicians at all levels in Pickering will be able to secure a bright future for nuclear energy for the benefit of the city, the province, and Canada. It is up to you to check on them!

LinkedIn Isn’t the Place to Express Your Frustrations and Anger

By Nick Kossovan "The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on." - Arab proverb. If you spend time on LinkedIn, you'll undoubtedly notice the platform has become overrun with barking dogs—job seekers who are frustrated and angry—while employers keep moving on, looking after their self-interests. Job seekers expressing their "emotions" online aren't doing themselves any favours. It's common knowledge employers Google candidates and check their LinkedIn activity to determine whether they're interview-worthy. An employer's reputation and brand are represented by its employees, making it prudent to vet candidates' online behaviour by looking for red flags such as: · Offensive behaviour · Narcissistic behaviour · Content designed to provoke (trolling) · False information · Negative (read: bashing) posts about former employers or employers in general. The last red flag is worth noting as employer-related negative posts are increasingly prevalent. Some posts I've read come across as if the poster is waging a holy war against employers. Three reasons you shouldn't complain online: 1. Complaining is toxic. 2. Complaining is not leading. 3. Complaining keeps you stuck where you are. "Don't be overheard complaining... not even to yourself." - Marcus Aurelius. Describing something—an event, an experience, a person—negatively (complaining) without indicating the next steps or plans to fix the problem or yourself is easy. The act of complaining requires little thought and no action. What good has complaining ever done? Publicly venting your frustrations and anger may feel like you're "sticking it to the man," but does it change your circumstances, increase your chances of landing a job, or make you happier? Self-proclaiming career coaches and resume writers serve their self-interest by telling job seekers that the reason they're not getting interviews is because their resume sucks. While this may be true, it's rarely mentioned that employers may be turned off by a job seeker's online behaviour. I've met many job seekers with a rockstar-like resume, frustrated they weren't getting interviews. After reading some of their LinkedIn comments, I can see why employers aren't contacting them. I know of two instances where a job offer was rescinded due to the to-be employee's online behaviour. While your resume is important, what's more important—critical to landing interviews—is your digital footprint. Employers will disregard your candidacy no matter how skilled or experienced you are if they feel your online behaviour may affect their brand and reputation; hence, your online behaviour has consequences. Whether those consequences benefit or hinder your job search is entirely up to you. Keep your rants, vents, and anger about employers and the job market off LinkedIn and other social media platforms. While your feelings may be valid, your behaviour isn't. More than ever, Image is everything! Instead of showing your network and employers your armchair opinions about how employers don't know how to hire, show why you should be hired. Do not allow your ego to lead you to think your opinions and rants will influence employers' hiring decisions. On the other hand, while complaining may feel cathartic, it hinders your job search efforts because: Complaining is never a good look. When you post complaints on LinkedIn, you put your negativity on full display for your network and employers to see. Furthermore, you're publicly biting the hands that you want to feed you. Regardless of how you frame a "rant" or "venting," it'll likely convey a bitter, angry, or entitlement tone, which isn't an impression you want to give to your network and employers. · "Wow, this person would be difficult to work with." · "This person has a poor attitude." · "Why's this person painting all employers with the same brush?" · "This person is playing the 'I'm a victim!' card." · "This person needs to stop blaming everyone." Appearing bitter and angry towards employers will hinder your job search. Complaining in public shows a lack of emotional control and judgment. Managing your emotions and responding appropriately to challenging situations is a crucial aspect of being a professional. Complaining about your job search difficulties or criticizing employer hiring practices on LinkedIn shows a lack of self-control and judgment of the possible consequences of your online behaviour. Understandably, employers seek employees who can remain calm under pressure, handle setbacks gracefully, and project a positive, solution-focused attitude. Publicly expressing your frustrations suggests you might have trouble handling workplace challenges or negative feedback. Complaining makes you appear entitled. Complaining gives the impression that you feel entitled to a job and have unrealistic expectations, which are turnoffs. Employers gravitate towards candidates they feel will be grateful for the opportunity, eager to contribute, and committed to achieving success. When you complain, you appear focused more on what you believe you are entitled to than what you can offer. LinkedIn is the most powerful tool you have at your disposal to reach employers. Hence, you want to project an image that attracts employers as opposed to repelling employers, which is what you're doing when you complain about employers and the job market. Bashing employers on LinkedIn won't change how they look after their self-interests. Focus on your self-interests; to find an employer you'll want to align your career with. Barking at employers won't stop the caravan from moving on. ________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

OUR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS ARE BEING ELIMINATED AND WE ARE ALLOWING IT TO HAPPEN, SHAME ON US

It’s unfortunate but the majority of we the people, pay absolutely little attention to our municipal politics. Only when municipal elections come around every four years do some of us think about voting and then less than 50% of eligible voters actually vote, and probably half of those voters do not known whoor why they are voting for someone, they just want to be able to say they voted. If you were to ask people who their ward councillor is, most people couldn’t tell you. Why, because wepeople are too busy with our lives and blind to what’s happening in our city, town or community. Wetake little interest in municipal affairs People use the excuse for not voting, “why vote, they just do what they want”. Well that’s our mistake. Municipal politics are the one place that we can actually change things. Mayors and councillors actuallyhave to answer to us, the people not a party leader. So why are we not making them accountable? For these past years Municipal Councils across Ontario consisting of mayors and councillors who we elected, have slowly and sneakily been re-writing the by-laws to remove our rights at council meetings. Our so called representatives have voted by-laws aimed against we the people such as some listed; 1. reducing the allotted time each citizen can speak (delegate) to a topic on the agenda 2. banning neighbouring municipal citizens from delegating to a topic on the agenda 3. removing an open question period (a time allotted anyone to speak to the current agenda) 4. removed the right for a citizen to have a topic added to the agenda, when submitted within the required time prior to the council meeting 5. banning the right of a neighbouring citizen to have a topic added to the agenda when submitted within the required time prior to the council meeting 6. barring the media from filming or recording the council meeting unless approved by two coucillors and voted on by council prior to the council meeting 7. barring all members of the public from filming or recording the council meeting 8. banning members of the public from bringing placards, signs or flags of any kind to council 9. banning public show of support by applauding or public booing if opposed to a topic 10. trespassing ‘members of the public, that exercise their Civil and Human Rights”, from all publicbuildings for a period of time It would seem that the elected members of council(s) who have voted these by-law changes in, are in direct conflict with the “Constitution of Canada” and “Civil and Human Rights” and they, the members should be challenged. Also, 150 of 444 of our Municipal Councils, the Mayors and Councillors we elected, are now asking for more power. They want the power to fire their elected colleague and have that person prohibited from running in the next election. They want this done through an integrity commissioner so council can deny they fired an elected councillor. People Wake Up, Pay Attention, your Municipal Council meetings are usually held once a month, same week day of the month and the public can attend, just check on the internet for your city’s web site, council meetings and calendar for date and time, agendas are also posted.. If you are not able to attend, must councils do live streaming so you can watch at home, you can even watch past meeting. Remember, Silence Solves Nothing, It’s Time To Stand Up, Speak Up For Your Rights, Before They’re Gone. Keep Democracy Alive

Friends, Neighbours, and fellow Canadians

By Lisa Robinson I stand before you today, not just as an elected official but as a deeply concerned citizen who believes that our beloved city—and municipalities across Ontario and Canada—are heading in a dangerously wrong direction. It is with a heavy heart and a clear sense of duty that I address the serious concerns and allegations I must make against my Council, the Corporation of the City of Pickering, and other levels of government. Some of our city leaders have strayed far from the principles they were elected to uphold. They have shown a blatant disregard for the constitutional rights of our citizens—freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of the press are being trampled upon in pursuit of ideological and personal agendas. Our bylaws are being broken repeatedly, catering to special interest groups and developers while the voices of ordinary citizens are being silenced. In recent months, Pickering council has introduced draconian, undemocratic policies that limit public participation and transparency within our beloved chambers. Delegation time limits have been slashed from 10 minutes to 5, the public is no longer allowed to record public meetings, and the media too is barred from recording unless given a two-thirds majority of the council's approval. And already council has shown their true colours by voting against a media outlet who holds opposing views. Residents from outside of Pickering, including Durham residents, are prohibited from participating in our meetings unless the topic is approved by a two-thirds majority—this, despite we contract with their government and the fact that four of our council members sit on Durham Region Council. Even Pickering residents are now silenced from speaking openly, freely in our chambers unless their topic has been scrutinized under a microscope and approval given by a mover and seconder and a 2/3rds vote. Let's be clear: if the council doesn’t want to hear what you have to say, or if they don’t like your opinions, they will silence you. They are effectively forbidding you from having a voice. This is not just a disregard for free speech—it's an outright attack on your right to be heard. Let’s talk about the new, nebulous trespass policies—what I call the “hurt feelings bylaw.” These draconian rules give the council the power to banish anyone based on flimsy excuses like social media posts, language, tone of voice, or even what someone is wearing if it offends someone. This isn’t just a policy; it’s a blatant attempt to silence dissent, crush opposing views, and manipulate the narrative to fit their agenda,views, and control the narrative. We’ve seen what looks like outrageous manipulation in the city's YouTube feeds of our council and committee meetings—time jumps, white noise, and possible signs of audio tampering. When I pushed for an independent third party to record our meetings to ensure moving forward that these recordings were accurate and transparent, since the public is no longer allowed to record, the City of Pickering flatly refused. This isn’t just poor governance—it’s outright tyranny. Our councils and governments are intoxicated with power. It seems to give them a perverse pleasure to divide us, to make us feel helpless, to instill fear in those who dare to hold opposing opinions. This toxic culture is ruining relationships, tearing families apart, and forcing people to live in constant fear of speaking their minds, their truths. This nightmare needs to end, and it will only end if we, the people, rise above the nonsensical nonsense they are trying to impose. It’s absolutely scandalous how taxpayer dollars are being squandered on frivolous spending at every level of government, while critical needs like providing clean drinking water to our First Nations communities are callously ignored. Despite countless failed promises of keeping our duty to consult, as of this past July, 31 First Nations communities remain under long-term drinking water advisories. This is not just a failure—it's a betrayal. We hear endless land acknowledgments, but these are nothing more than empty words, lip service, when not backed by real action. Our First Nations people deserve access to clean, safe drinking water, and it is our solemn duty to push and deliver on that promise no matter what level of government. But the disgrace doesn't stop there. Our homeless population is increasing and our food banks are struggling to keep food on the shelves while our governments and city officials, who are supposed to protect and serve us, are instead taxing us deeper into poverty. Yet, their wages and benefits continue to increase, while they sit idly by, letting our most vulnerable citizens suffer in silence. Our government continues to waste taxpayer dollars on lavish perks for elected officials and city staff, sending funds abroad to other Countries without addressing the suffering of our own people. Millions of dollars are being funneled into consultants and reports that are hidden from the public, and thousands are spent on politicians to attend events that serve only to benefit the politicians and the vendors who wine and dine them for future business. Maybe the Premiere could put legislation in place that would disallow any elected official and city staff from receiving gifts and benefits from developers, vendors, special interest groups or anyone lobbying the governments for business. Maybe Politicians should wear these lobbyist logos on their jackets to show transparency of who supports them, so the people can keep track of how they vote and see where their loyalty lies. Rob Ford was a true champion of fiscal responsibility, unafraid to call out the wasteful perks enjoyed by city employees. He was determined to keep politicians and public servants in line, ensuring that every dollar of taxpayer money was spent wisely. This corruption must end. The City of Pickering on top of all of their wasteful spending is also vindictive, hateful and voted to spend $200,000 of tax payers dollars to fight me in a judicial review, instead of paying me $15,000 plus in lost salary that I was financially sanctioned on the recommendation by Principles Integrity for doing my job on behalf of my constituents. It's deeply troubling that Integrity Commissioners, who hold significant power over elected officials, are themselves unelected and paid by the very municipalities they oversee. This creates an inherent conflict of interest, where their loyalty may lie more with those who sign their paychecks than with the principles of fairness and accountability. I ask, do we really need them, They have only been implemented in the last few years, yet they wield immense influence over our democratic processes. Council and the Corporation of the City of Pickering and all levels of government need to remember that it is your money, meant to be used judiciously for the common good, not for self-serving agendas. This is not just mismanagement—it’s a criminal neglect of duty. In Pickering, the Integrity Commissioner has audaciously pushed for and was granted changes to our policies and procedures to ensure their Integrity reports cannot be questioned. This is nothing short of a blatant effort to shield their actions from scrutiny and undermine transparency and public trust. When you realize that Principles Integrity, the firm the Corporation of the City pays and relies on, is serving 65 other municipalities, it’s evident that their impartiality is severely compromised. In my personal experience, the Integrity Commissioner has proven to be untrustworthy and biased. They have repeatedly lied, failed to investigate complaints thoroughly, and refused to answer any questions from those they accuse, effectively preventing individuals from clearing their names. Let me be absolutely clear: this is a rigged system. The integrity of a process where those responsible for upholding fairness are instead serving the corporation's interests, not ours, is fundamentally flawed. It’s high time our Premier steps in and enacts legislation to protect the public’s interest and prevent officials from manipulating the system to shield their misconduct. We need reforms that ensure accountability and transparency, not a façade of integrity designed to protect the corrupt. In Pickering and throughout Canada we are also witnessing a disturbing trend where the right to personal dignity is being stripped away from men, women, boys, and girls in spaces that should be safe bathrooms, change rooms. People are being forced to share these spaces with members of the opposite sex, leading to widespread discomfort and real psychological harm to some. What’s even more troubling is that only members 18 years and older at our Recreation Complex are protected to use spaces aligned with their biological sex, leaving children and those who can’t afford memberships vulnerable and unprotected from these same rights. This is not just unfair; in my opinion it’s disgusting. We are discriminating against the most vulnerable among us—our children and those who lack the means to protect themselves are having to beg to use a biological changeroom. This is inhumane It’s absolutely absurd that these changes have only emerged since COVID. For as long as we’ve existed, nobody has ever had to beg for the basic right to use their biological washroom. It’s disturbing beyond belief that anyone ever thought this was a good idea. What we’re witnessing is a catastrophic lapse in common sense, leading to dangerous consequences. Globally, there have been too many tragic incidents in these spaces - these aren’t isolated events, and they can’t be ignored. This isn’t about politics; it’s about the safety and well-being of our citizens. We must safeguard their right to personal dignity and stop sacrificing them on the altar under the guise of political correctness. I urge Premier Ford and all members of parliament to implement common-sense legislation before it’s too late. I am certain that neither Premier Ford nor any other parliamentarian want to change in spaces with children, let alone children of the opposite sex, and if you do then your values will become questionable. Our citizens absolutely deserve to be safe and our children protected, and we cannot allow this misguided policy to continue With all of the bullying, intimidation, threats, attacks on my character, sexual harassment, and psychological harassment that I have had to endure, and the corruption, collusion, and what I consider bribery that I have witnessed, I have suggested that all members of the council be investigated for wrongdoing. Yet not a single member—not even the mayor—would second that motion. What does that tell you? It’s very telling when those who cry the loudest about integrity refuse to have their own actions scrutinized. If they have nothing to hide, why didn’t they support an investigation? The silence from council speaks volumes. We are also witnessing a troubling trend of our city catering to special interest groups at the expense of our own procedures and bylaws, principles of fairness, and equality. Time and again, procedures and bylaws have been selectively enforced or outright ignored to serve the agendas of a few, rather than the common good. Rules for me, but not for thee. This selective enforcement has not only broken the trust between the government and the people but has also erode the rule of law in our city. Over the past few months, my mayor and fellow councillors have been participating in a downright dangerous game to lobby the provincial government to change the Municipal Act so they can remove a sitting elected member. This is a direct attack on democracy, where the people—not politicians—should have the power to decide who represents them. If this change is allowed, it opens the door to unchecked abuse of power, where dissenting voices can be silenced at will. It’s a blatant attempt to consolidate control and eliminate opposition, turning our councils into echo chambers for those in power. It's not only happening in Pickering but in other municipalities, and any elected official pushing for this should step down immediately for betraying the very democratic process they were elected to protect. This move isn’t just undemocratic; it’s authoritarian. We must fiercely oppose any effort to strip the people of their right to have a voice and to choose their leaders. Our duty is to serve, not to rule. It is also disgraceful to see politicians at all levels of government using name-calling and shameful rhetoric to silence and intimidate those who dare to speak up. These tactics are designed to stop people from expressing their concerns and to create an environment of fear. Let me be absolutely clear—this disgraceful behavior starts at the top with Trudeau and you, Premier Ford. You've set the tone, and now my mayor and fellow councillors think it’s perfectly acceptable to stoop to your level and It’s no wonder that this garbage has trickled down to fake Facebook accounts and keyboard warriors who think they can hide behind screens and hurl insults without consequence to those with opposing views within our communities. You’ve all set a shameful example. It is absolutely appalling to see my fellow politicians behave this way spreading vile rhetoric to silence and intimidate anyone who dares to oppose them and speak their truth. These pathetic tactics are nothing but a coward's way to stifle free speech and breed fear. Only spineless cowards hide behind such childish nonsense. Real leaders engage in real conversations, they listen, and they address issues with respect and integrity. Those who stoop to name-calling and character assassination have no place in leadership. If Politicians can’t uphold thedignity of their office, then step down. Because this kind of toxic behavior is a stain on our democracy, and we are better than that. I have personally faced relentless bullying, intimidation, and threats from my mayor and fellow councilors, including financial sanctions, name-calling, and persistent lies attacking my character—all because I am standing up for what is right – just like I am here today. But these are not just attacks on me; they are attacks on the very principles of integrity, honesty, and accountability that should guide all Politicians actions. In my opinion, our municipality, like many others, needs to be torn down and rebuilt, giving power back to the people, where it rightfully belongs. And The rot doesn’t stop at our city councils, provincial, federal government, or other institutions. Historically, Canada had defamation laws and journalistic standards that aimed to prevent the spread of false information. However, with the rise of digital media and the push for sensationalism, these standards have eroded, allowing biased and misleading reports to flourish. The CBC and other journalists have become a disgrace, promoting rumors using clickbait titles instead of investigating the truth. They have become another group paid to report certain narratives that fit their agenda, rather than the facts. This is not journalism—it is sensationalism, or if I may be so crude to say BS, and it’s nothing other than a betrayal of the public’s trust. I call on Premier Ford to bring back Legislation that demands accurate reporting by all journalists based on facts and hold media accountable for their role in spreading misinformation. I would also like to ask Premier Ford, to have a serious conversation with Prime Minister Trudeau about the millions of dollars being funneled into the CBC. This government funding looks more like bribery than support for unbiased journalism. If we're truly committed to media transparency and integrity, we need to stop propping up an organization that increasingly serves as a mouthpiece rather than a check on power. Let's put an end to this questionable financial relationship and restore faith in our public institutions. It is also disheartening to see how DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives, which were intended to foster inclusivity, have instead become sources of division and exclusion. Globally, DEI policies are being banned as they are increasingly recognized for their counterproductive effects—fostering division rather than unity and indoctrinating individuals to adhere to a specific narrative. In Pickering, DEI is being enforced across all areas of the corporation, including the hiring process, which is deeply troubling. Such policies should not lead to discrimination based on skin color, religious beliefs, or sexual preferences. I was the only one who voted against its implementation because, as a leader, I recognize the importance of seeing what everyone else can see but I can think differently and question if what is being presented is universally beneficial or not. Our approach must reflect true inclusivity, promoting equality and respect for all individuals. The solution is straightforward: treat everyone equally and fairly based on merit and character, united under the red and white flag of our country—the Canadian flag. We should not be segregating people into groups by the colour of their skin, religious beliefs, or sexual preferences which are only designed to divide us. This approach will ensure that our policies genuinely serve the common good rather than creating new forms of exclusion. It’s our duty as politicians to remain in a state of neutrality and not cause division by a hierarchy of beliefs and chaos. This is not about being left or right—it is about what is right and what is wrong. It is about common sense for common people. The name-calling we see from politicians at all levels of government used to silence and shame those who dare to speak up, is disgusting. Only cowards hide behind such childish rhetoric, not leaders. And those who engage in it should apologize or step down, for they are not fit to lead. Our municipalities need to be torn down and rebuilt with integrity, transparency, and respect for the people they serve. We must return power to where it belongs—in the hands of the people Our children deserve to grow up free from political agendas that impose adult issues on them, especially when it comes to making life-altering decisions about their bodies. We cannot allow children to be pressured into choices that involve irreversible hormone blockers or surgeries that remove healthy body parts. These are decisions with lifelong consequences that no child should be forced to make. Let our children be children. Let them learn and grow in an environment of respect, dignity, and safety, where their innocence is preserved and their well-being is prioritized. It's our duty to protect their future, ensuring they have the time and freedom to discover who they are without the weight of adult controversies on their young shoulders. We should be teaching our children that no safe adult will ask them to keep secrets. As for our government claiming transparency and accountability these have become mere buzzwords, not practices. We were not elected to cater to developers, special interest groups or make friends with those with deep pockets following along with the status quo. Yet, we see our leaders doing exactly that, pushing through agendas that benefit the few at the expense of the many. We need to be a government that serves the people, not one that serves itself. We need to be leaders who listen, who act with integrity, and who put the public good above all else. We need to restore transparency, accountability, and trust in our institutions. And we need to stand up to the bullies, the corrupt officials, and the special interest groups who are trying to take away our rights and freedoms This is not a fight I take on lightly, but it is one that must be fought. For the sake of our city, our province, and our country, its people, and future generations to come. We must stand up against this abuse of power, this corruption, and this betrayal of public trust. We must restore integrity and trust in our government, and I am committed to leading that charge. Together, we can bring about the change that is so desperately needed. Serving the people, not ruling them. Strength does not lie in the absence of fear but in the courage to face it head on and rise above it "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

From Renting to Home Ownership

By Theresa Grant Real Estate Columnist Home ownership can seem like an impossible dream for some, and others have it on their must achieve by a certain age, list. As with all things in life, it’s better to know all the ins and outs of attaining home ownership so you can make an informed decision as to whether or not it’s for you. What will you need and where do you start? Well, if you have family members or a close friend that could share their journey to home ownership with you, that is great. If, however you don’t, it’s always best to consult with a professional. A Realtor, a Mortgage Broker, or a Financial Services agent, can all help you map out a plan to home ownership. Very often the institution that you bank with will be more than happy to set you up with a free consultation to discuss what exactly you are looking to achieve and then help you to get started on the exciting path to home ownership. The two biggest things needed are an income that will comfortably cover not just your mortgage but all of your expenses, and a good credit rating. The lending institution will look at how much you make versus how much you owe to creditors. This is called the debt service ratio. There are two calculations when lenders are running the numbers. They first look at your income as it relates to covering the mortgage, property taxes and the heating of the property. If you are wanting to purchase a condo, half of the condo fees are also included in this calculation. This initial figure cannot exceed 39% of your income. The second calculation is more encompassing. It involves all of your debts like car loan, line of credit, credit cards, anything you have financing on. Given that this calculation is broader and takes everything into account, it stands to reason that his number would be higher. This number comes in at 44% of your income. These figures are based on Canada Mortgage and Housing guidelines. Take a look at your credit report. If it’s good, then just keep doing what you’ve been doing. If it’s less than stellar, there are a few things that may be affecting it negatively that you can change. Making your payments on time is a big one. Creditors like to see that you take the repayment of your debt seriously and make your payments responsibly. Utilization of your available credit is another big one. If a lender sees that you are almost maxed out on your cards, even if you pay them every month, it tells the lender you rely on the cards heavily. The more you can pay down on your loans and cards, the higher your score will go. It can be a good idea to sit down a year or so before you want to purchase and make a check list. It could look like this, pay off the lowest balance of at least one credit card. Make sure all payments over the next year are on time. Do not take any new credit cards or loans out over the next year. Pay off anything you can but leave the account open. The reason you leave the account open is because it shows lenders that you have the credit available to you, but you don’t need to utilize it. You will need a down payment. That will be whatever you can save after paying all of your expenses. Often people will move from their nice large apartment with all the amenities, to a much smaller space with no amenities to be able to save for a down payment for a year or two. The minimum requirement for a down payment in Ontario is 5% of the purchase price of the home. There are many things to take into consideration when it comes to home ownership and how to attain it. Listen, ask questions, and always consult a professional. Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com

When In The Course…

When In The Course… from Wayne & Tamara I was 20 when I married a wonderful guy who is 12 years older than me. He was so mature I thought he must be the wisest man in the world. There was no need for me to study or follow a career because he would be a good provider. All I had to be was his pretty wife and give him children. Almost 15 years later I am left with two wonderful children and so much bitterness in my heart I sometimes feel life is not worth living. Over the last nine years he has been unemployed for months and changed jobs seven times. On his last job he was drinking most of the time and fell into depressions and aggressions until it came to a stage where the children and I were afraid of him. All this time I was the provider of the family and worked very hard in unhappy circumstances just to keep the family alive. I finally realized I had to do something for the sake of my children and myself. I asked my husband for a divorce. He refused. Months later I made another attempt for a separation. I think he realized I meant it, and somehow he found a wonderful job within two weeks. His personality changed again. He stopped drinking and in general is nice to me and the children. My problem is I do not know how to change my feelings. I no longer respect him. I am almost willing to say I've started to hate him. Although he is nice at the moment, I cannot bring myself to trust or love him again. I tell myself for the sake of the children I should stay with him, but I am battling even to be nice to him. Whatever he does annoys me. I wish he would just find another girlfriend and disappear out of our lives. He says he isn't willing to go to counseling since he is not the one with the problem. Can time heal my unhappiness? Barbara Barbara, before they declared their independence, the American colonies were generous in supporting the British crown. Of their own volition the colonies sent more revenue than the mother country required. Despite this the king and parliament imposed one burdensome tax after another on the colonies. Perhaps the most infuriating of these was the 1765 Stamp Act, which imposed a tax on every scrap of paper of record. Even playing cards and dice were taxed. These taxes were imposed not for the benefit of the colonies, but "for improving the revenue of the kingdom." The result was that every act of the British crown became viewed with wariness, suspicion and mistrust. A few years later, when the East India Company was stuck with thousands of tons of unsold tea, laws were passed in England to allow the sale of cheap tea to the American colonies. Although parliament bypassed American distributors, this action would have resulted in cheaper tea and benefited most people in America. But the colonists would have none of it. In New York and Philadelphia ships carrying tea were turned back to England. In Charleston tea rotted on the docks. And in Boston people staged the famous Boston Tea Party. Dozens of men disguised as Mohawk Indians dumped a shipload of Darjeeling tea into the harbor. There comes a time when it is too late to change the course of human events, and then a revolution which need not have occurred, does occur. Usually when we get a letter like yours, it is written by a man. The writer begins by admitting he neglected and mistreated his wife for years, and then explains he has changed. The writer concludes by saying his wife will have none of it. Why? Because like the American colonists, she has had enough. She has issued her own declaration of independence. Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

A Hot Problem in the City

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Do you know the new problem that is starting to kill some people? It’s not a viral disease, but it’s spreading in very hot climates. Caring pet owners protect their dogs from it, but some people are not taking the same precautions. What’s the trouble? It’s third-degree burns that result from contact with hot pavement. Our sidewalks are becoming deadly! Climate change is creating environmental extremes. Floods for some. Fires for others. And in some cities, there are growing numbers of people suffering severe burns from contact with excessively hot outdoor surfaces. The statistics show that not only are more such burns occurring each year, but more people are dying from very large and deep burns caused by prolonged contact with hot sidewalk pavement. The New York Times reported on a case in Las Vegas. A man, having had a few too many drinks at his favourite bar, passed out on a sidewalk during the day as temperatures rose to 109ºF. He woke up in hospital with severe burns, and not only to his skin. He suffered third-degree burns that scorched deep into the underlying muscle and bone. Treatment for his burns required several weeks in hospital and multiple operations to salvage damaged tissue. For a few drinks, it was a huge price to pay. There are other examples where alcohol wasn’t a factor. One elderly man tripped and fell on stones in his own backyard. He badly scorched his hands, forearms, and legs in trying to get himself up. Another person had the same problem, not due to age but to excessive weight. The pavement was so hot that summertime clothing did little to alleviate the scorching intense heat. Cries for help brought bystanders, but the damaged was done. This person also received dangerous burns requiring hospitalization, surgeries, and a very painful process of recovery. Children as also falling victim. For example, toddlers don’t realize how hot door handles can get or even car seats in the sun, and they don’t have well-developed withdrawal reflexes. In the blink of an eye, babies can crawl from cool grass or safe playground surfaces onto hot pavement, or from a beach towel onto blistering hot sand. They may not cry until after a damaging burn occurs. People with diabetes comprise another category of victims. Their damaged nerves and poor circulation, especially in their feet, increase the risk of burns from walking barefoot on hot concrete and not feeling pain. Amputation is the only possible treatment for ten per cent of diabetics who burn their feet. How many people fail to think of their pet’s paws on hot asphalt. Do this simple test. If you can’t hold the back of your hand for seven seconds on the sidewalk, then it’s too hot for your dog. We will all need to be more careful about burns from hot pavement. But don’t forget about where burns remain most common and preventable. That’s in the kitchen. Use your common sense, as nearly everyone can identify the risks. Young children should not be near the stove. Older people need to make adjustments when cooking. Among seniors, burns are the second leading injury at home after falls. So don’t attempt to carry pots and hot dishes that are too heavy to handle safely. And don’t wear loose clothing that can catch fire, especially at a gas-burning stove. What can be done about that scorching pavement? Let’s start by not building more and more of it. Cities and subdivisions will continue to expand. But we need to use better design with more greenery, and a lot less concrete and asphalt. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

“EXPOSED” - MUNICIPAL Councils Are Working Against Constituents S-O-S, S-O-S - PEOPLE OF ONTARIO PAY ATTENTION TO THIS ALERT

EXPOSED - YOUR MUNICIPAL MAYORS & COUNCILLORS ACROSS ONTARIO ARE PLOTTING TO DEPRIVE YOU, THE PEOPLE OF YOUR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS. YES, the Municipal Councils, the people you elected, are working against you, the public. They want the right to have a council member fired from council, they also want the right to have that person who you elected, banned from running in the next election, why? So you the people can’t vote that person back in. In other words, municipal councils want the right to deny you the public your democratic right to who you can vote for. This is the First Step in Killing Democracy. Ontario Municipal Councils have been writing the AMO (association of municipalities of Ontario) which is an elected board consisting of members from the different municipalities of Ontario. The Municipal Councils are begging the AMO to have Premier Doug Ford amend Bill 5, re the ‘Municipal Act 2001’ to allow Municipal Councils to fire a colleague (one of your elected members), and to do it by having the Integrity Commissioner be the one to say a council member should be fired there by absolving the council of being the ones doing the firing. The council will tell you the public that they didn’t fire your elected member. Just another way of hiding by covering the eyes of the public with half truths. The real question is, why would a council want or need to fire an elected colleague? Crimes, sexual harassment, harassment & abuse etc all have ways to be dealt with, example, Human Rights, Criminal Courts etc. Could it be that the fellow elected members, who does not follow the council’s agenda, who does not rubber stamp things but actually works in favour of the people is showing up the rest of the council and exposing what’s happening? I have to wonder? Who are these council members that are running your municipality, who are making decisions that affect your life, your city, town or community,? Who are theses councils who want the right to fire a colleague, an elected member? Do these municipal councils know anything about democracy? If they do not know the difference between a hired employee (staff) by a business -vs- a person elected by the people, then should they really be running your municipality? PEOPLE IT’S TIME, STAND & SPEAK UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS, KEEP DEMOCRACY ALIVE Email Premier Doug Ford at both ….. premier@ontario.ca and correspondence.premier.gov.on.ca Email AMO, Pres Colin Best at ….. amopresident@amo.on.ca Email the city clerk of your municipality (call your council office and get the clerks email and tell the clerk to copy every member of council with your email.) Write the following to the Premier, the AMO and your Municipal Council, let them know how you feel. 1. How dare municipal councils ask for this right to fire an elected person. Only we, the public (voters) have the right to fire an elected member and we will do this in the next election by using our democratic right to vote for our choice. 2. Tell them you are watching and that their voting and decisions will have a direct way on how you vote in any upcoming elections. Citizens of Ontario and Canada, Your “Silence Solves Nothing” It’s Time for Action, to Stand Up For Your Rights Before They Are Gone

Beware the fraudsters!

By Thersa Grant/Real Estate Columnist We’ve all heard the heart wrenching stories of people who’ve been duped out of several hundred or a few thousand dollars by unscrupulous fraudsters advertising properties for rent that they do not own. How does one protect themselves so that they do not fall victim to such a scam? It can be difficult, as these fraudsters have become somewhat advanced over the years, in terms of how they advertise. With the introduction of artificial intelligence it will only get more difficult to discern fact from fiction. There are generally two types of rental fraud out there. The first is someone renting a unit briefly and advertising it as a long term rental, while pretending to be the Landlord. In this situation, the perpetrator will take first and last month’s rent from someone, along with a key deposit of a few hundred dollars, a damage deposit, in some cases an upcharge for parking or other things. This can total several thousand dollars. The second and perhaps more easily detectable is the situation whereby a property is advertised, it looks amazing and is being offered at a ridiculously low rent. When someone contacts the supposed owner of this property, they are told that the owners, often a couple, are on a mission with their church and out of the country currently. In some cases, they are told that the supposed owners have had some sort of family emergency and are out of the country. They are told stories that would make the average person think they are dealing with a kind, generous, compassionate person. When in reality they are dealing with the exact opposite. In this scenario, the entire transaction takes place online. Money is sent to the fictious owner of the property in advance. The would-be tenants are shown beautiful pictures of what they will be renting, told a story of how they will be helping the owners, just by living there and taking care of this property for them while they are out of the country. They are told that the keys will be ready for them on moving day. There is usually a family member of caretaker going to drop off the keys, but they cannot get there at the moment as they live out of town. They are led to believe that they are part of some amazing win- win situation. These fraudsters prey on people. They take advantage of people’s sense of hope. Everyone likes a bargain. Everyone is looking the for the best deal they can get. Everyone needs a home. We’ve all heard the saying, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. That is the truth. However, people will always hope against hope that maybe, just this once, this is the real deal. It usually never is. There are a few things you can do to protect yourself. First of all, never ever send money in advance of viewing a property in person. Google the address of the place for rent. Google the name of the person calling themselves the Landlord. Although it may seem unusual or even uncomfortable, ask the person purporting to be the Landlord for some kind of identification. Landlords are acutely aware of the degree of fraud taking place in the rental market today. Most would not be offended or insulted by making such a request. If you are on site, look around and ask questions. Landlords are happy to answer your questions because they are looking for the right tenants. Scam artists don’t like questions, they will try to rush you, and make you feel as though if you don’t act now, you may lose out on this amazing property. They will often say that you need to act fast because there are several people wanting this space. Keep in mind, great spaces at reasonable prices don’t need to be forced or pushed on people. If you are feeling pressured in any way, let that speak volumes. Heed your inner voice and remove yourself from the situation, with your money still in your bank account. If you find yourself caught up in a fraudulent rental scam, contact your local authorities to report the incident. Questions? Story ideas? You may reach me at: email newspaper@ocentral.com

Three Rules For a Hollywood-Ending Job Search

By Nick Kossovan You can increase your chances of a "Hollywood ending," to your job search, however, you can't guarantee it. Some years back, a late afternoon on New Year's Eve. My phone rang as I walked along the newly snow-plowed sidewalk to my home. After three months of back-and-forth with a financial service provider, my to-be boss was calling me to tell me I got the job. What a way to end 2013! Then there was the time I was given the "you're no longer a fit" speech, which I knew was coming. (TIP: Learn to read the room.) As I was packing, a company I'd been interviewing with—as I said, I knew what was coming—called, hiring me to manage their customer service department. Within 10 minutes, I'd call my wife to tell her I had lost my job and then call her back to tell her I got a new one. Always be reading the room. Always be looking. I've had several Hollywood-ending job searches, not quite "a dream job offer, champagne celebration, and living happily ever after," but very close. Based on my experience, a "Hollywood-ending" job search can be moderately orchestrated, but only to a certain extent, the main influencing factors being: Establishing yourself as a Subject Matter Expert (SME) through a compelling personal brand, LinkedIn profile, resume, cover letter, and digital footprint. Actively networking and building relationships. Interviewing skillfully and leaving an impression that makes your interviewer say, "We need [your name]!" Negotiating an attractive compensation package. Feeling a genuine sense of excitement about your new job. Fade out "The End" Role credits However, external factors such as economic conditions, employer priorities, and ubiquitous "hiring manager's preferences" influence the aforementioned influencing factors. It would be naive to believe getting a job offer doesn't involve some element of luck. Ultimately, you can increase your chances of a "Hollywood ending," but you can't fully orchestrate or guarantee it. All you can do is put in the work, remain flexible, and be open to unexpected opportunities. While your job search should be characterized by positivity and persistence, remember that a degree of luck plays a role in your job search, as it does throughout your life. Share I attribute my experiencing several Hollywood-ending job searches to having conducted my job searches by adhering to the following rules: Think for yourself. The Internet, especially LinkedIn, is populated by self-proclaimed job search experts—talking heads—who are willing to take your money for information you can find for free. I've yet to come across a "job search expert" or "career coach" who doesn't offer rehashed cookie-cutter advice. Following the same advice as other job seekers will not differentiate you in today's hyper-competitive job market. Thinking for yourself, a practice that is decreasing—following and looking for shortcuts are easier—will. Because I learn by doing, I advocate DIY job searching. In addition to saving money, DIY job searching is how you learn and develop job searching skills, which, as layoffs have become the norm, is a crucial career management skill. I attribute much of my job search and career success to thinking critically—evaluating the pros and cons against my needs and wants—avoiding groupthink, exploring unconventional paths, charting my job search course and most importantly, trusting my instincts. Nobody knows me better than me. Rocky, Whiplash, Ford v Ferrari, The Founder, and Steve Jobs are just a fraction of the many Hollywood movies where the protagonist walks their own path while thinking for themselves and ends up achieving their end goal(s). Know what you can and can't control. A recipe for frustration: Trying to control what isn't yours to control. Long ago, I accepted that employers own their businesses and, therefore, own their hiring process. Instead of obsessing over (read: wasting time and energy) how employers hire, which many job seekers do, I shrug my shoulders and say to myself, "If that's how they want to run their business, then so be it," and move on. Accepting that you can't control how employers hire will improve your frame of mind. Acknowledge your limitations. "A man's got to know his limitations." - Inspector Harry Callahan (Clint Eastwood) in Magnum Force. Another reason many job seekers are frustrated is that they aren't acknowledging their limitations (e.g., skills gaps, lack of experience). Life's harshest truism is that none of us are equal biologically, genetically and at an intelligence level. Biology is the root reason why “life isn't fair." Therefore, let go of the belief life should be played on an even playing field. At the onset of my career, I was frustrating myself by trying to compete against those with inborn aptitude or affinity—I call them naturals—for the jobs I was aiming for. It wasn't until I acknowledged and accepted my limitations and my naturals that my job search results improved, and my career started heading in the right direction. A sense of self-awareness, combined with critical thinking, has given me the smarts to target roles and employers suited to my capabilities and present myself authentically and confidently; after all, I'm in my wheelhouse. Take it from me, humility and honesty lead to better job search results and sometimes to a "happy ending" worthy of the silver screen. ________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

My friends neighbours, and fellow citizens

By Lisa Robinson My friends, neighbours, and fellow citizens, We stand at a pivotal moment in our community’s history. It is a moment where we must decide who we are, what we stand for, and how we will shape the future for ourselves and generations to come. For too long, politics has been dominated by those who serve themselves before serving the people. We’ve seen corruption seep into the very fabric of our institutions, leaving too many of us feeling powerless, unheard, and disillusioned. The voices of the people, the everyday hard-working citizens who make our community thrive, have too often been drowned out by the noise of self-interest and backroom deals. But today, I stand before you to say: Enough is enough. We deserve better. We deserve leaders who are willing to fight for the common good, who are guided by common sense, and who understand the struggles and hopes of the common people. I am here not just as a politician but as one of you—a member of this community who knows what it’s like to worry about paying the bills, finding a safe place for our children to play, and making sure there’s enough food on the table. I know the frustration of seeing our tax dollars wasted on projects that benefit the few while our schools, hospitals, and public services suffer. But I also know the strength and resilience of this community. I’ve seen it in our neighbours helping neighbours, in our local businesses lifting each other up, and in the voices that refuse to be silenced in the face of injustice. And no matter our differences, we are united under one banner—the Canadian flag. A flag that represents the values we hold dear: fairness, equality, and justice for all. It reminds us that we are stronger together, bound by a shared commitment to build a brighter future for every Canadian. I believe in a politics that puts people first—where the needs of our families, our workers, and our seniors take precedence over the interests of the powerful. I believe in transparency, accountability, and integrity. And I believe that together, we can build a government that truly serves the people. But I can’t do it alone. I need your help. Together, we must stand up against the corruption that has taken root in our political system. We must demand that our leaders act with honesty and fairness. We must hold them accountable when they fail us, and we must work tirelessly to ensure that our government reflects the values of our community. I promise you this: I will always stand up for what is right, even when it’s difficult. I will listen to your concerns and make sure your voices are heard. I will fight for a future where our children can grow up in a world that is fairer, more just, and filled with opportunity. This is our moment. This is our fight. Let’s stand together, united in our determination to bring about real change. Let’s reject the politics of division, corruption, and cynicism. Let’s build a future where we can all thrive, proud to be Canadians, and proud to stand together beneath the red and white of our flag. And when future generations look back on this time, let them say that we were the ones who stood up, who spoke out, and who made a difference. Let them say that we were the ones who fought for a better, fairer, and more just world. Thank you. Thank you for your trust, your support, and your belief in the power of the people. Together, we will create the future we all deserve—united as Canadians, and as a community God Bless "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

Life Is A Beach

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - How times have changed. I remember as a kid going to the beach and looking for the many flags posted along the coast line. Green meant low surf, yellow medium surf, red meant do not go in. The biggest danger was that if you swam during a red flag that there was a good chance you get pulled out to ocean. For those wondering. I was born in Uruguay, South America. A place where clouds are as rare as ugly women. The beach was a great place to sit around and sun tan. Take a swim in the salty ocean water. Now don’t get me wrong. On the occasion they would post double red flags... this was normally due to flooding up the Rio De LaPlata that connected to the Amazon, hundreds of miles to the north in Brazil. When it would flood. The access water would run off into the Oshawa with severe force. At times taking all kinds of animals with it. Including snakes and all kind of God’s creatures. Most would die once they hit the salt water... As a journalist, I sit here in Canada and read all the beach closings. My first thoughts, snakes, caimans (alligators)... I remember the red flags warning of high surf and danger of being taken out to the ocean. No, instead. Here in Canada, we have to worry about catching something from the so called fresh water lake. We have to worry about needles, cigarette buts and as reported in Wassaga beach human excrement buried in the not so white sand. Now, don’t get me wrong. I am a proud Canadian. I am not complaining about Canada. I am complaining at the deterioration of the quality of our water. Red flag or beach closure here could technically mean you will catch some sort fungal infection. Let’s look beyond the algae, the bio-hazard material in our so called pure fresh water lakes... This is the same water we drink. This is the same water we bathe. This is the same water we pee and poo in. This is the same water that when you die they drain your blood into. Surely, they purify it.... The question in my mind. How long, how many times can you purify waste water before it you are just purifying waste. Drinking waste, bathing in waste? Tricky question. Scientist would argue... you can do that forever... Well, I am hard press to believe that. Think about it. The liquid may be the same. The composition similar. But much like in the human DNA. Does exposure over time not change it’s fundamental building blocks. We are humans. We are composed of the same compound with the DNA coding that makes who we are. Then let’s ask this question. If we are what we were. They why do we have so many different weakness in our immune system. In our ability to fight off disease? Society you say? I say malarkey.

Canada's defence capabilities in crisis in this uncertain world.

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East I have discussed some problems related to National Defence in the past, but I cannot resist doing so again.This time I'm addressing the continued lack of interest the Canadian political establishmenthas shown in this crucial topic. As aMember of Parliament for four and a half years who served on Parliament's National Defence Committee,I feel that National Defence issues were treated superficially and with a lack of genuine interest. There are signs everywhere that the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) are in deep crisis. The foremost is our Forces' lack of military capability and capacity compared to Canada's close allies. The Canadian Armed Forces have been neglected for decadesthrough poor recruiting, lack of personnel, and the inadequate supply of suitable and modern equipment. Today Canada is only able to contribute token units to continental defence, not to mention any foreign contingency. A key part of the capability challenge involves an antiquated, inefficient and costly procurement system that often delivers equipment years late, at inordinate cost;equipment that is less effective than what is available on the market. Furthermore, the military's capabilities and capacity are hampered by a dire personnel situation within the CAF. Many key positions are at half of the authorized staffing and populated with inefficient and poorly qualified public servants. Finally, there are the issues surrounding the utilization of the military, including over-deployment and ineffective and/or counterproductive uses which illustrate a highly inefficient army leadership unable to stand up to undue political pressure. It is also sad to see the deflection of huge monetary resources to costly and adventurous projects overseas instead of the fortification and modernization of our own armed forces for our nation's protection and security in this uncertain world. Today we see more and more evidence of deeper systemic problems that afflict the Department of National Defence (DND) and defence policymaking due to gross neglectperpetuated for years by both major Canadian political parties. The political establishmentfailedto properly resolveemerging problems,because they only usedsuperficial reform measures to treat the symptoms of decay over the past fifty years. Many of the reforms implemented over the years focused on secondary consequences rather than addressing the root causes of these challenges. In many ways, this approach has steadily deteriorated DND's capabilities, subsequently causing an intensification of the problems they were trying to solve. So here, we are today,thus incapacitated,facing major issues. At the end of the day, is it all aboutthe money? Many have pointed to the decades of underfunding experienced by the military as the primary cause of the mess the country finds itself in. However, itis notthat simple. Certainly providing more budget stability would help immensely, as National Defence is currently struggling through another round of budget cuts, led by a "yes sir" inefficient Minister. Yet it would be too simple to attribute the situation solely to budgets.In some respects, they too, are merely a symptom of the deeper issues afflicting defence. The issues are reflective ofthe severe lack of technical knowledge from which defence and government officials suffer. The lack of skilled staff members has corrosive consequences across the entire organization: incorrect decisions, inaccurate estimates, and a slowing of decision-making are all hallmarks of this problem. Unfortunately, I witnessed all these realities during my service in the military and the House of Commons. The core issue with National Defence in Canada,and arguably the most important one,concerns accountability, authority, and leadership. A persistent lack of accountability all the way to the top, including non-elected and elected officials, has created an inability to implement decisions quickly. In normal times,public servants in government departments would adhere strictly to policy and consensus-based decision-making that effectively requires the views of all players,including the supposedly knowledgeable elected officials around the table, to be aired and addressed quickly and efficiently. However, during years of exponentially increased incompetence, this process has become an extremely costly joke for taxpayers, and is now seriously endangering the safety and security of the country.Sadly,there is daily evidence that this circus continues with impunity with no end in sight. Operating an effective military requires acknowledging the uniqueness of employing deadly force and sustaining the personnel and equipment necessary to achieve that aim. Culturally, the military relies heavily on individual leadership within a chain of command to achieve its objectives. This is fundamentally different from any other department or the public service. We must acknowledge that there is an urgent need to elevate true leaders both in the military and the civil service dedicated to the military, and provide them with the requisite tools and authority tomanage programs in a timely and cost effective manner. All participants must "work the process" and build consensus with governmental stakeholders effectively and efficiently, withouttaking weeks months or years to achieve the objective. For example, the Conservative Government of Canada was ready to sign the agreement for the F 35 aircraftin 2015, but indecision and wobbling on the part of that government cost taxpayers dearly. Ten years laterthe Liberal Government of Canada, which hypocritically opposed the deal originally, signed it, spending substantially more, andsignificantly delaying delivery in crucial and dangerous geopolitical times. It should be noted that the government approach is fundamentally different from best practices in the private sector, where authority tends to adhere more closely to the military model than the public service one. This must change radically and immediately because we cannot afford more mistakes in a time of drastically increasing dangers on the international scene. At the present time too many people, with any particular agenda, are able to derail the department's objectives. Also, when things go wrong-as they so often do in Canada when it comes to procurement-the blame is dispersed so no one is held ultimately responsible, and nothing is fundamentally changed. It is necessary to implement a process that dilute neither accountability nor throws up roadblocks based on strictly artificial bureaucratic perspectives. Any comprehensive reform effort must address these points. Doing so would result in major aspects of defence falling into place-personnel management, procurement, budgets, etc. If Canada is to fix its national defence and reach the incredible potential of its capabilities, it must grapple with the root causes of the problems it is facing. Let's hope we see improvement soon!