Saturday, September 14, 2024
Questions Hiring Managers Ask Themselves When Assessing
By Nick Kossovan
Readers often ask me for insight into the mysterious and confusing "how employers hire." While the recruitment process—keep in mind there's no universal recruitment process, as every employer assesses candidates differently—may seem shrouded in secrecy, there are common questions that hiring managers consider when evaluating job candidates.
Your interviewer won't ask these common questions directly; they're in their mind. Hence, never take your interviewer's questions at face value; try to discern the underlying question.
INTERVIEWER: "Do you live nearby?"
QUESTION ACTUALLY BEING ASKED: Will this candidate be reliable?
INTERVIEWER: "Tell me about a time you were in a conflict with a colleague and how you
handled it. What was the outcome?"
QUESTION ACTUALLY BEING ASKED: Will this candidate be easy to work with?
Understanding, and therefore speaking to, the following four questions on every hiring
manager's mind is a sure way to endear yourself to your interviewer.
Will this person be a fit with the current team and company?
The primary concern for a hiring manager is whether a candidate will seamlessly fit into the company's culture and existing team. Demonstrating how well you'll 'fit in,' you'll significantly increase your odds of getting hired. Employers are looking for more than just someone who can do the job. They're looking for candidates who'll be a natural fit and complement their current employees' work styles and personalities.
A candidate who doesn't mesh well with the team will disrupt productivity, create interpersonal tensions, and drain morale. Therefore, understandably, hiring managers pay close attention to a candidate's communication style, emotional intelligence, and teamwork skills.
Your interviewer is likely asking themselves:
• How well is this [candidate's name] listening and responding to me?
• Does [candidate's name] seem like someone who'd be comfortable working in a team?
• Will [candidate's name] clash with [names of employees the candidate would be working
closely with]?
Ultimately, you want your interviewer to envision how you'll function in the existing workplace culture, that who'll be a natural fit, will hit the ground running and not be a square peg in a round hole. Contrary to entitlement-fueled belief, employers aren't responsible for you fitting into their workplace; that responsibility is entirely yours.
Will they be easy to work with? (read: Will they be easy to manage?)
With so much anti-employer rhetoric nowadays, hiring managers assess more than ever whether a candidate will be pleasant to work with and easy to manage. They want to avoid candidates who'll require handholding, are overly sensitive to feedback, or are simply difficult to work with.
Skilled hiring managers recognize red flags such as:
• Defensiveness or antagonism in response to questions
• Rigid or inflexible thinking
• Failure to take accountability for mistakes
• Tendency to make excuses or blame others
You want to come across as a candidate who's mature, resilient, and a proactive problem-solver with a growth mindset, not someone who'll be a high-maintenance employee.
Will they be a liability?
Employees are liabilities.
Employers want to minimize their liabilities.
A critical aspect of hiring is vetting candidates to ensure nothing in their background could adversely affect the company. (e.g., offensive online behaviour, having been let go for cause, exaggerating or lying about their experience and qualifications)
Ultimately, hiring managers must be confident that a new hire won't bring any legal, ethical, or behavioural baggage that could expose the company to liability. The company must trust that the chosen candidate will be responsible, hardworking, ethical, and professional and that their outside activities, especially online, will not harm its brand and reputation.
Will they stick around?
I've yet to meet a hiring manager who doesn't gravitate toward a candidate they feel will be a loyal, engaged, committed long-term employee. After not deeming a candidate a fit, having a feeling or getting the impression that the candidate is only looking for a stepping stone is the second most likely reason I reject a candidate. Onboarding and recruiting are time-consuming and expensive; therefore, employers aim to avoid disruptions and costs associated with turnover.
Your interviewer will look for signs that you're genuinely interested in the role and the company as opposed to just a paycheck. Hence, you'll be asked about your long-term career goals and, if you're currently employed, why you're looking for a new job. (Rare is the candidate who answers this convincingly.)
Your work ethic, reliability, and ability to handle the role's demands are all qualities you want your interviewer to get a sense of. Provide evidence that you have stamina, the ability to adapt, and the commitment to succeed. Keep in mind employers want to reduce costly turnover as much as possible. Your interviewer will pass on your application if they feel you will be around only briefly. Finding the right candidate isn't about skills and experience; these are secondary. Someone who'll foremost be a loyal and engaged employee and has the right skills and experience is the right candidate.
If you feel you're acing interviews ("I aced the interview! I answered every question on point.") but not getting offers, it's likely because you didn't answer the four aforementioned questions every hiring manager asks themselves when interviewing.
__________________________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham,
economy,
Facebook,
Football
CORPORATE LIES
CORPORATE LIES
By Joe Ingino
Editor/Publisher
ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000
Published Columns in Canada and The United States
“I live a dream in a nightmare world”
Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life
was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow.
- ONE DAY AT A TIME -
We live in dangerous times. Times, when we can’t tell the truth from a lie. A time when honesty and hard work just does not pay as most are holding multiple jobs to just stay a float.
We are constantly bombarded by all kind of misinformation. Our minds are controlled and manipulated in such ways that may almost be deemed a form of neurosis.
Who can you trust in these ever changing times. Our culture and our traditions are being compromised by forced acceptance in the name of inclusion. In the process deteriorating our standards and our way of life.
In the name of convenience we are being forced to a form of mental slavery that if you do not follow you are castigated emotionally, financially and at times legally.
For our convenience we must pay service fees. For our convenience we must check out our own items at a supermarket.
For our convenience we must go on line instead of in person for many administrative functions.
For our convenience we are lied to and forced to fear things that are not real or make sense in many cases.
Remember the days, when you would drive in to the local gas station and two sometimes three attendants would come out to pump your gas.
They would check your oil, your fluids. Offer you coffee or tea. They would check the tire pressure and be as polite as they could be. Normally they wore some sort of corporate uniform and constantly smiled and assured the best customer service.
WHAT HAPPENED?
Today for my convenience I must pump my own gas. Check my own tire pressure. Check my own oil. The attendant in many cases a foreigner that barely speaks english with an attitude as if someone had offended him/her by offering them the job they have.
This week. I received this email: ‘We care about your safety.
Hi Joe, starting September 3, your local Petro-Canada™ stations will require pre-payment for fuel. This means that before you begin fuelling you will be required to pre-pay for fuel at the pump, in-store, or through the Petro-Canada mobile app.
We’re making this proactive change to ensure everyone’s safety at our sites, and we expect pre-paying for fuel will reduce the risk of fuel theft. We recognize it may take some time for customers to adapt to the change, site staff will help guide customers through this new process. Thank you.’
Can you believe the attitude? For everyone’s safety!!! You got to be kidding.
What a load of lies and deception. 1st. Gas prices are out of reach for many. 2nd. These gas companies are looking to not pay an attendant $20/hr and have the consumers pre-pay without cash.
This is despicable. How dare, Petro-Canada treat it’s clients in this way. What is worst is that they are sticking it to us under the false guise of ‘EVERYONE’S SAFETY’.
I have a message for Petro-Canada. 1st. I will never shop there ever again. 2nd. I call on all consumers to boycott Petro-Canada to send a clear message to either take cash. Trust the customer to be an honest good person and not demand pre-pay and have pre-pay only as a consumer choice. This must be done before all the other gas stations take the lead and follow suit. We are becoming slaves of corporate greed. ‘Everyone’s safety’.
What a load of corporate lies....
Canada and the issue of productivity
by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC,
FEC, CET, P. Eng.
Former Member of Parliament
Pickering-Scarborough East
In the last quarter of century we have observed a slow but continuous deterioration of our living standards. There are many factors that have contributed to this, but one stands out as a major one, and that is the decline in productivity.
Today, the majority of Canadians believe that Canada is broken after years of stagnant incomes, affordability challenges, rising crime rates, government failures on basic functions like healthcare and immigration, and a deepening cultural malaise.
Productivity refers to how efficiently we use our resources to produce something of value. Productivity growth makes Canada richer, allowing us to access better healthcare, education, living standards, and even environmental outcomes.
Decline in productivity is a choice, not a phenomenon that cannot be controlled. Canada can overcome productivity decline through better public policies and political leadership, which are missing in action. It is abundantly clear that Canada’s productivity growth is dismal, but no one in the current political establishment is considering it seriously. Without a drastic change in policy, the OECD forecasts that our productivity growth will rank last among its 38 member countries. Canada’s GDP per capita has advanced more slowly than leading economies in recent years. It has barely reached pre-COVID levels and the gap with the United States has widened. This is strongly linked to a relatively weak productivity growth. A slump in Canada’s resource-sector investment following the 2014 oil-price collapse has been particularly influential in this. Weakening productivity and investment performance echoes longstanding concerns that Canada is tapping less successfully than other economies, into opportunities to increase output through capital investment and innovation in products and processes. A wide range of policy actions can potentially increase business-sector productivity. There are proximate policy levers, such as tax breaks on investment and R&D that deepen capital and technological progress.
In addition, there are less direct instruments, such as improvements to infrastructure and market efficiency, and reforms that strengthen vocational education and skills.
Influences on market efficiency include competition policy, red tape in setting up businesses and bankruptcy processes. Barriers to foreign direct investment via foreign ownership restrictions continue to be high in Canada relative to those in other OECD countries, particularly in network sectors. For instance, in telecommunications rules state that both ownership and board composition must be at least 80% Canadian in operations with more than a 10% share of the market. Rules applying to the aviation sector also need reconsideration because they are essential to providing better mobility for the work force in a country whose territory is the second largest in the world. Though it has not yet created significant policy issues, teleworking should remain on watch for policymakers.
According to Canada’s Labour Force Survey data, as of October 2022, 9% of workers reported that they usually worked both at home and at locations other than home (hybrid working) while 15.8% reported working exclusively from home.
A priori, teleworking has widened labour markets and options on where to live. There may also be productivity gains; one survey of Canadian employees has found that 63% of respondents feel they are more productive working from home.
The potential downside to teleworking may be losses in productivity from reduced in-person contact. A permanent shift to teleworking may need to be considered in some areas of policy, for instance in transport planning. Data continue to show that movement through transit stations in Canada remains below pre-COVID levels
Lowering internal trade barriers remains one of the most effective ways policy can help boost Canada’s productivity and living standards.
Canada appears unusual in her lack of universal regulations and technical standards across sub national jurisdictions. This hampers the flow of goods and services and compromises the labour market. Perhaps the best known example is the restriction on the movement of alcohol and tobacco products between provinces. Such barriers extend across many activities, including the dairy sector, engineering, healthcare professionals, legal and accounting services, and many others. The non-recognition of qualifications remains an issue notably in some areas of the healthcare sector and compulsory trades, where only members with the relevant official qualifications (or apprentices) can legally be employed. These include electricians, plumbers and crane operators. The Federal and Provincial governments seem bewildered or are intellectually blocked in dealing with this issue. Evidence continues to mount on the economic cost of internal trade barriers, yet nothing is done to eliminate them; nothing but lip-service.. Furthermore, federal government debt ballooned from $660 billion to $1.37 trillion between 2015 and 2024.. During the same period, the value of machinery and equipment in Canada decreased by 5 percent. Excessive government spending hinders economic growth by crowding out private investment and requiring higher taxes to support increased spending. It leads to a heavier regulatory burdens, which can stifle business activity.
Government programs also adjust more slowly to changing economic conditions, reducing economic flexibility. Moreover, larger government expenditures encourage rent-seeking behaviour by businesses, diverting resources from otherwise productive activities.
Collectively, these effects reduce productivity and economic growth.
Another factor that influences productivity is qualified labour shortages, which cost small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) over $38 billion in lost sales annually.
Meanwhile, between 2015 and 2024, federal public-sector employment has grown 43 percent, nearly three times faster than private-sector employment. m Had the federal public sector maintained the same growth rate as the nation’s population, there could potentially be up to 72,000 more workers available for private sector employment. m Assuming two out of three workers were employed by SMEs, and using an average of $450,000 revenue per employee, SMEs could have generated over $21 billion in additional annual revenue.
Taxation policy is another tool that influences productivity.
In 2016, the federal government raised the highest federal marginal tax rate by 4 percent. Combined with provincial rate increases, seven out of ten provinces now take over 50 percent of marginal earnings in taxes from high-income earners. This gives Canada the fifth-highest combined marginal tax rates among 38 OECD nations. Compared to the United States, our largest competitor for skilled workers, all provinces except Alberta and Saskatchewan have higher marginal tax rates than any U.S. state. These tax hikes have negative consequences besides spending taxpayers’ money on futuristic and useless projects. Every tax increase makes Canadian entrepreneurs think twice about starting companies in Canada. In conclusion, action on productivity is needed immediately. Let us see if the political class is up to the task. For now it is up to you to ask them. This is about our future. Help secure it!
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Durham,
economy,
Facebook,
Football,
game,
gayrights
KEEP IT GREEN
By Patricia Conlin
During this time of great upheavals, there are many lessons to learn that impact our future ability to adapt and thrive in our work and lives. What are we to do to move forward? How can we begin to see better days ahead you might ask?
For some of us, there is a frantic effort to keep going and maintain the status quo that is leading to burn out and increased physical and mental health issues. For others, there is a paralyzing feeling hopeless and experiencing anxiety...which leads us to feel exhausted constantly and only make a marginal effort at work at home or with each other.
But there is another approach, a middle path so to speak...
I learned some valuable lessons from having a summer garden that have helped me enormously to stay strong and resilient in difficult times. A garden starts with a plan. During all the months of planting, weeding, harvesting and processing my food, I had time to reflect on the problems we are facing in our communities across Canada and how we can unite and work together to solve them.
Here are some of the garden lessons that I would like to share with you:
Planning: A garden project, like a business, life or community plan, needs to be detailed. Certain plants need more sun, more topsoil or to be separated from other plants. Rotating crops is critical for soil health. The current practice of monocropping is destroying our rich soils just like the practice of limiting view points and respectful dialogue is destroying our communities and stifling free speech and democracy. Gardens just like communities need healthy soil (free speech), a variety of plants (many different people and ideas) and constant attention and love.
2 Sowing: It is always incredible to witness tiny seed growing into large fruit bearing plants. Be careful which seeds you sow and how often you tend to them. Are you wasting time sowing only one kind of seed in difficult soil that may not grow? Are you providing the seeds the things it needs to grow well like sun and water… - a strong relationship built on trust and a mutual respect with regular value added contact?
3 Weeding: During the summer the weeds became terrible. But the weeds need to be removed as they choke out plants cause the harvest to suffer or even be killed. Like weeds in our garden, our own negative and limiting thoughts and emotions are “weeds” that keep us from achieving our true potential or even enjoying the blessings of each day. As I gardened this summer, I challenged my emotions and reminded myself to be grateful and keep going. As I plucked out my own “weeds”, I felt my energy and fighting spirit returning. I returned to the garden and saw the lesson of how pulling weeds allowed our plants to thrive. We need to all get rid of your own weeds so our lives can thrive again. Let’s stop feeling overwhelmed in small steps and focus on rebuilding momentum towards our goals. Your weeds could be self-limiting beliefs, a difficult relationship, feeling loneliness or depression or bad habits like eating too much junk food or not exercising. Whatever your weeds are right now, identify them and rip them out of your life!
4 Learning new Techniques in the garden: I have learned how to pickle, ferment and properly store vegetables and how to make delicious sauce from tomato crops in the past. I have learned how to freeze dry food for long term storage and how to cook new recipes using the bounty of the garden. And just like the plants in the garden, learning in life keeps us growing too. Whether it is a craft or wood-working project, a course or even reading a new book, keeping learning in our lives keeps us healthy and strong. I started learning archery and find it very fun. What are you learning right now?
5 Enjoying the Bounty: Sometimes in gardening, like in life, we get into work mode and forget to celebrate each day. When you bite into a fresh cucumber or savour a fresh bean, pea or tomato, you realize that it is worth all the effort. I made sure to enjoy the bounty from our summer garden by trying out new recipes each week with my veggies and taking time to “smell the roses” so to speak with the miracle of growing food. When it comes to our life , we need enjoy our bounty as well. Like celebrating a family birthday, appreciating the neighbour’s flowers, taking a walk in a serene forest or thanking the checkout clerk at the local grocery store-are all ways to stop into gratitude and enjoy the “bounty’ of our lives no matter what stresses might be impacting us.
6 Storing Food from the garden: With some of the extra food from my garden, I have looked into ways to store it for the winter. Vegetables like potatoes and onions can last several months if stored properly in a cool dark place We are all used to having grocery stores to provide a large and diverse supply of food and we have refrigerators and freezers to store it. But learning to store up during tough times is still a good lesson. When my father was young, his family was very poor as he grew up during World War 2. His family had a large vegetable garden and a cold cellar in the basement. If they didn’t learn how to properly store food in the winter, they wouldn’t have enough to eat. I remember him telling me how he learned to store potatoes in sand and how one year he allowed the potatoes to touch each other causing rot. This meant his family didn’t have enough potatoes for the winter and he never forgot the lesson. It is always a good lesson to store up during difficult times. We can reduce our overheads and expenses and learn to do things ourselves instead of outsourcing. We can avoid overspending and waste. Learning to store up a bit for tough times can include all bounty including money as well given the uncertainty in the economy.
What areas of your life can you take care of by storing up this Fall?
7 Saving and using your own seeds: The miracle of gardening is the same as the miracle of life. Despite our moods, our doubts, the weather set-backs and predators of all kinds, there is always a miraculous bounty if you put in the hard work. What I learned from my experience as a gardener is that we often toss out our seeds instead of saving and using them in upcoming seasons. I started saving seeds a few years ago and it has made all the difference. Imagine taking a small portion of your beans and letting them dry out then saving the seeds and planting them the next season. This is unbelievably impowering and also saves us money and produces fresher bounty the next season. But most people throw out the plants including their seeds that they don’t want instead of saving them. This applies ourselves too as most people throw away their own “seeds” or ideas before they even make an effort to “plant” them or take action to make them happen! What “seeds” or talents do you possess that you can use to build success for next season? Think of what you are naturally good at, what you are passionate about, what interests you have. Then blend those “seeds” with your efforts. Plant your own seeds regularly and make sure to follow up with nurturing care.
Having a summer garden has been enormously rewarding. Even though the work is significant, the joy is great as well. The garden taught me many lessons but first and foremost it taught me about the balance of all season. As members of a community here in Durham, we need to find the balance between the push to succeed and the joy of the journey, so that we can maintain momentum and plant the seeds of success for Durham and our own families in future seasons. “Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished” Lao Tzu
“ To plant a garden is to believe in tomorrow” Audrey Hepburn
Concerns Over Election Interference: Truth or Misinformation?
By Dale Jodoin
As the United States gears up for its next presidential election, familiar concerns are once again bubbling to the surface. With campaigns in full swing, the media and government are issuing warnings about potential interference from foreign powers—particularly Russia. Similar fears are being echoed in other democratic nations like Canada. But are these warnings grounded in reality, or are they just part of a larger narrative pushed by certain groups? Let’s take a closer look.
For several years now, accusations of Russian interference in U.S. elections have made headlines. These claims assert that Russian-backed groups are using social media, fake news, and cyber-attacks to influence how Americans vote. The goal, according to these claims, is to weaken Western democracies by sowing division and confusion among voters.
But not everyone buys into this narrative. Many conservative media outlets and their supporters argue that the mainstream media is exaggerating the threat of Russian interference. They claim that the accusations are being used as a convenient excuse to discredit conservative candidates—especially those who push back against liberal agendas.
“It's laughable,” said one commentator on an independent news platform, dismissing the idea that Russia is the primary cause of division in the U.S. “Most of the media today are left-wing, and they’re the ones pushing these stories. They don't like conservative voters or conservative candidates, and they're trying to blame their unpopularity on outside interference.”
A key criticism coming from the right is that most of the mainstream media in the U.S. leans heavily to the left. This means that conservative voices are often underrepresented or dismissed. The claim that Russian interference is primarily aimed at supporting conservative candidates or stoking support for figures like Donald Trump is viewed with suspicion by many on the right.
“They’re not concerned about Russian interference; they’re concerned about conservative voters,” one political analyst said. “The media are trying to make it look like any conservative victory is illegitimate. But the truth is, people are voting for conservative policies because they’re tired of the direction the country is heading under left-wing leadership.”
This perspective paints a different picture from the mainstream narrative. According to this view, the real problem isn't foreign interference but rather a media landscape that’s hostile to conservative viewpoints.
One of the most polarizing figures in recent U.S. politics is Vice President Kamala Harris. Critics argue that the media has portrayed her in an overly positive light, despite what they see as her poor performance in office. Harris was given the task of managing the U.S.-Mexico border crisis, a responsibility that critics say she has failed at.
“The border has never been in worse shape,” a conservative commentator noted. “Millions of people have crossed into the U.S. illegally, and yet the media is telling us that Harris is one of the greatest vice presidents in history. It’s all spin—they’re pushing her as the future because Biden isn’t living up to the hype, but people can see through it.”
Some conservative commentators argue that Harris is being promoted simply because she checks certain identity boxes, rather than because of her track record in office. They claim that the media is trying to build her up as a potential presidential candidate, despite her lack of significant accomplishments.
“The media has been lying about her performance from day one,” one critic argued. “They’re setting her up to replace Biden because he’s not popular anymore. But the truth is, people aren’t buying it. They don’t want her because of her policies, not because she’s a woman.”
On the other side of the political spectrum, former President Donald Trump and his supporters have been labeled as the victims of misinformation campaigns. This has led to accusations that Trump voters are being misled by Russian-backed propaganda.
But many Trump supporters reject this claim outright, arguing that they are informed and capable of making their own decisions. “The idea that we’re being tricked by Russian propaganda is insulting,” said one supporter. “We vote for Trump because we believe in what he stands for—lower taxes, stronger borders, and America first. It has nothing to do with Russia.”
Some conservative commentators go even further, accusing the left-wing media of using the “Russia” narrative to avoid addressing the real reasons for Trump’s continued popularity. “They can’t admit that people like Trump’s policies, so they try to blame it on foreign interference,” one analyst remarked. “But the truth is, people are tired of the left’s agenda, and they want real change.”
As the debate over election interference rages on, many people are turning away from mainstream media outlets in favor of smaller, independent news platforms. These outlets, which often lean more conservative, argue that they are the ones telling the real story.
“Our readers come to us because they’re tired of the lies from the big corporations,” said an editor of a small, independent newspaper. “We don’t have a political agenda—we just report the facts. The truth is, the left has been manipulating the narrative for years, and people are finally waking up to it.”
This shift toward independent media has created a divide in the information landscape. On one side, you have the mainstream outlets, which continue to warn about foreign interference and the dangers of disinformation. On the other side, you have smaller platforms that argue that the real problem lies with the media itself.
As the 2024 election approaches, the debate over election interference is unlikely to go away. On one side, you have those who believe that foreign powers like Russia are actively working to undermine democracy. On the other side, you have those who argue that the real interference is coming from within—specifically, from a biased media that’s out of touch with the average voter.
At the end of the day, it will be up to voters to decide what they believe. But one thing is clear: the information landscape has never been more divided, and the stakes have never been higher.
In Canada and the U.S., where democratic values are central to the nation's identity, it’s important for voters to sift through the noise and seek out the truth for themselves. Whether that truth comes from mainstream outlets or independent platforms, it’s essential that citizens stay informed and engaged as they prepare to head to the polls.
For now, though, the debate continues—on social media, in newspapers, and on television screens across the world.
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham,
economy
Compulsory Certification is the answer
Jesus Was a Tradesperson
By Murray Strong
Compulsory certification is the answer. I am trying to understand the position of the Ontario government concerning skilled trades. Is it discrimination? Is it racist? Is it a way to keep young people trapped in poverty? Is it an immigrant issue? Maybe the politicians do not care about the skilled trades people except at election time, or when their toilet overflows. Quebec is a province that cares about its people. Maybe it’s a religious upbringing or they want the young French people to have a life career. Quebec government knows how important employing skilled trades means to the economy. THEY MADE CARPENTRY A COMPULSORY TRADE!!
My wish is Ontario treat apprentices with respect if you want young people to become the needed workforce to keep the province moving forward. When I researched how immigrants where brought into Canada under the foreign worker program, I was in shock. If a friend or family member lives in Ontario and has a small business the door is open. The friend (employer) spends $10,000.00 per worker to cover the cost of airfare and other expenses which the government will refund. New employee becomes a slave. Never late for work. Do everything you are told or a call to the government that things are not working out sends you home.
One paycheck entitles you to a Canada Pension for life good anywhere
in the world. Canada Health Act makes Ontario give new employee health care. Workers comp covers any accident. Government helps poor suffering employer with a wage subsidy. After a few months you apply to live in Canada. No need to pay some scam idiot in your country to get you in, just call yourself some kind of skilled worker. They are doing nothing wrong and it’s perfectly legal. I think it’s time someone minding the store has heard the unemployment level for young people .14 % is disgusting for a country. Shame on you. Employ Canadians and immigrants. Remember God is watching how you treat his family. Thank you. Denny Crane
Canada Should Take a Page from Kamala Harris’s Small Business Playbook
By Daryl Ching, CFA | Managing Partner
Vistance Capital Advisory
Since being announced as the Democratic Nominee, Kamala Harris has made a splash and most notably, she has demonstrated a keen interest in encouraging startups and small businesses in the United States. She has set a goal of 25 million new small business applications for her first term in office. To achieve that goal, she has made a number of proposals:
· Increase the tax deduction from $5,000 to $50,000 for costs of
starting a small business
· Develop standard deduction to help save small-business owners time when filing taxes
· Reduce barriers to occupational licenses to for works in trades across state lines or for
businesses to expand to other states
· Initiate a small business expansion fund to enable community banks to cover interest costs
when emerging enterprises are trying to expand
· Harris had pledged one-third of federal contract dollars go to small businesses by expanding
opportunities in rural areas and underserved communities
While these are campaign promises and may not necessarily materialize, Harris is clearly an advocate of entrepreneurs and is looking to facilitate a record number of small businesses startups during her first term. Her tone clearly suggests she wants a country that strongly supports business startups.
By contrast, with the exception of the Canadian Entrepreneur’s Incentive (policy which reduces the capital gains inclusion rate for an exit of up to $2MM), which really was a minor offset to an announcement to increase capital gains tax inclusion, there is no new federal policy that substantively helps small businesses thrive in Canada. In fact, the latest policies of increasing the capital gains inclusion rate and the shutting down of the CDAP (Canada Digital Adoption Program) have made things more difficult for small businesses in 2024.
While the Bank of Canada has started to ease interest rates, corporate loans are still priced at over 9% interest for profitable small businesses and remain far off from pre-COVID rates. The Canadian government should consider a policy like what Harris is proposing – creating a fund for banks to provide relief on interest costs for small business loans. This would thaw the debt markets and make them more accessible to Canadian businesses.
It is unsettling to see that the ease of starting a business continue to diverge between Canada and the US. It will not be a surprise to see Canadian business owners pack up and move south of the border if they haven’t already. We certainly hope our federal government will take a look at the proposals put forward by Kamala Harris and consider taking a page out of her playbook.
About Daryl Ching
Daryl Ching is the founder and owner of Vistance Capital Advisory, providing accounting, capital raising and fractional CFO services to SMEs. He has over 10 years of investment banking experience, starting his career at RBC Capital Markets where he structured multi-billion-dollar transactions moving to smaller investment banks where he completed smaller debt and equity transactions in various asset classes. After leaving investment banking, Daryl started to work with small businesses as a CFO preparing financial statements, strategic planning, budgeting and forecasting, and raising capital through investors and banks. Mr. Ching has been well recognized as an expert in structured finance, making numerous appearances on the Business News Network and has been quoted in major newspapers and magazines across Canada. Mr. Ching completed the Honors Economics Program at the University of Western Ontario and is a CFA Charterholder.
Saturday, September 7, 2024
Do We Need to Live with Frequent Pandemics?
By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford
A pandemic, the rapid spread of infectious disease worldwide, is supposed to be a rare thing, right? In the 20th Century, we went decades without such problems. But was COVID-19 the beginning of more frequent unwelcome viral visitors? How attentive do we need to be to warnings of new viral diseases with different names? The World Health Organization has declared the latest outbreak of Mpox to be a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” It’s hard to tell if that means “Now listen here, get ready for another wallop,” or if we can safely go about our business with hope all will be well enough.
Given the WHO issued the same alert about an Mpox outbreak in July 2022, and then lifted the alarm in May 2023, one wonders if issuing warnings has the unintended consequence of fueling complacency.
But if Mpox becomes another pandemic, let’s pray that health authorities do not repeat the same tragic error. They must not completely shut down our society and the economy. We know how to adopt sound hygienic measures and that vaccines can be effective.
We have yet to learn, however, that most people could do more to protect themselves against viral infections by taking common sense approaches to protect themselves. For one example, it's stark negligence that health authorities don’t advocate more clearly about what people can do to build up and maintain stronger immune systems.
Now, it appears that a new strain of Mpox will test our fortitude. Experts say the new variant made its initial outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Then a traveller probably carried the virus to Europe, where Sweden reported a case of Mpox.
What should you know about Mpox? Infectious disease experts say it’s a close relative of the smallpox virus and that there are two different types, called clade I and clade II, the latter of which was responsible for the outbreak in 2022.
Clade I causes the most serious symptoms and is responsible for a higher rate of deaths. And this is the strain that is presently on the move.
What are the symptoms of Mpox? Initially, it presents similar to a common cold. But then a raised rash appears on the face, mouth, hands, legs, feet, or the genitals, easy to confuse with measles or chickenpox. Anyone in close physical contact with another person who has contracted Mpox is at risk. Contact with bedsheets or clothes of an infected person also enable transfer of the virus. Experts say there is an incubation period ranging from 3-21 days before symptoms appear.
Are we going to see a running count of new cases reported on the nightly news? It’s only a matter of time before all countries report more cases.
Fortunately, there are vaccines. The Mpox virus is closely related to the smallpox virus and existing vaccines for smallpox are proving effective in preventing infection from each of the strains of Mpox. That’s good news. But keep in mind, these vaccines are for prevention, and if the spread of disease is faster than the production of vaccine, we will have another problem. For now, only those people who are at risk of exposure are advised to get vaccinated.
How can people protect themselves when the disease is spreading globally? To start, be careful about that lengthy incubation period when symptoms are absent but close contact can transmit the virus. Stay loyal to one sexual partner. Demand the same in return. Warnings about viral pandemics are not the time for playing around.
Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments,
contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones
Jesus Was a Tradesperson
By Murray Strong
Compulsory Certification is the answer
Compulsory Certification is the answer. $260,000,000.00 more to set up training in the Skills Development Fund (SDF).
Nice mone. I believe the total invested in this group is $1,400,000,000.00 since 2021.
My opinion is we need more action and less talk. The SDF offers funding to organizations for innovative projects that address challenges to hiring, training or retaining workers including apprentices to drive Ontario’s economic growth.
My question to Premier Ford is where is the other $260,000,000.00 from the employers?
I have heard all the hard luck stories about the cost to train a Canadian citizen. Everyone in Canada knows we need 3.5 million new homes and another 500,000 new citizen’s arriving and looking for somewhere to live.
The government believes it can entice foreign skilled trades to come to Canada and work for less money. BC is trying this crazy idea. A company wants to bring in cheap labor . A foreign citizen wants to get into Canada to live. The company tells government this new employee is a superstar. New employee owes his life to the employer. New employee works for half the normal wage rate. Canadian citizens walk away from the trades because the wages are driven down. Employer gets rich. Sweet deal. Alberta is years ahead of Ontario in skilled training.
They know the importance to treating skilled trades with respect. Construction Ontario Training and Resource Centre states carpenters are the back bone of construction projects as the housing market continue to boom, skilled carpenters adept at both traditional and modern construction methods are in high demand . Number two behind electricians. The public should know Ontario has 140 skilled trades but only 23 are important . The rest are just common workers. Trailer trash. Jesus wants justice for carpenters. Add to the 23 like Alberta has done. Maybe God will forgive your insult to his family. Thank you. Denny Crane
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham,
economy
Bring Your Tax Dollars Home: A Call for Fairness in Canadian Tax Spending
By Dale Jodoin
In today's world, Canada is known for its fairness and generosity. We pride ourselves on welcoming people from all corners of the globe, whether they come here legally or are seeking refuge. But with all the good that we do, it's important to take a closer look at how we spend our tax dollars, especially when billions of those dollars are leaving the country each year. Could we be doing more with that money right here at home? This article explores the idea of keeping more of our tax dollars in Canada, making them work harder for everyone, including the newcomers who arrive on our shores.
The Outflow of Canadian Tax Dollars
Every year, Canada sends billions of dollars abroad in the form of foreign aid, international development projects, and contributions to global organizations. In 2023, Canada's official development assistance (ODA) alone amounted to approximately $6.6 billion. This money is intended to help developing countries with things like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. It’s part of our commitment to being a responsible global citizen.
But while we're sending all this money overseas, we're also seeing a growing number of people coming to Canada from many of these same countries. Some come seeking better opportunities, while others are fleeing conflict and persecution. According to the 2023 immigration statistics, over 400,000 people immigrated to Canada legally, and thousands more arrived as refugees or claimed asylum. These new Canadians contribute to our economy and enrich our communities, but they also need support—housing, healthcare, education, and jobs.
The Case for Keeping More Money in Canada
Given these numbers, one has to wonder: would it not be better if we kept more of our tax dollars here at home? Couldn’t we use that money to improve the services that Canadians rely on every day? Imagine if a portion of the billions we send abroad were invested in affordable housing, healthcare, and education right here in Canada. These investments would benefit all Canadians, including the newcomers who come here seeking a better life.
For instance, consider the issue of affordable housing. According to the Canadian Housing and Mortgage Corporation (CMHC), over 1.6 million Canadian households are in "core housing need," meaning they spend more than 30% of their income on housing that may not even meet basic standards of adequacy or suitability. If we redirected just a fraction of our foreign aid budget to building affordable housing, we could significantly reduce this number and ensure that everyone, including new immigrants and refugees, has a safe and affordable place to live.
Similarly, our healthcare system is under strain. With an aging population and increasing demands on services, many Canadians are facing longer wait times for surgeries and other medical procedures. In 2023, the average wait time for medically necessary treatment was over 22 weeks, according to the Fraser Institute. If more of our tax dollars were kept in Canada, we could invest in reducing these wait times, ensuring that everyone gets the care they need when they need it.
Balancing Global Responsibility with National Needs
Now, it's important to be clear: this isn't about turning our backs on the rest of the world. Canada has a long history of helping those in need, and that shouldn't change. But there is a balance to be struck between our global responsibilities and the needs of our own citizens.
We need to ask ourselves if our current spending priorities are the best way to achieve that balance. Are we doing enough to ensure that our tax dollars are being used efficiently and effectively? Could we achieve the same humanitarian goals by focusing more on domestic projects that also benefit our global commitments?
For example, instead of sending money abroad to build schools in other countries, why not focus on improving education here at home, and then offering scholarships or exchange programs to students from those countries? This way, we’re still contributing to global education while also strengthening our own educational institutions.
Supporting Newcomers with Canadian Tax Dollars
It's also worth considering how these changes could benefit the very people we aim to help with our foreign aid. Many immigrants and refugees come from countries that receive Canadian aid, but once they arrive here, they face the same challenges as other Canadians—finding affordable housing, accessing healthcare, and securing good jobs.
By keeping more of our tax dollars in Canada, we could provide better support for these newcomers. We could ensure that they have access to the services they need to thrive in their new home. This, in turn, would help them contribute more fully to our economy and society.
For instance, the government could use the money to expand programs that help newcomers integrate into Canadian society, such as language classes, job training, and settlement services. These programs are essential for helping immigrants and refugees become self-sufficient and successful members of our community.
A Fair Deal for Canadians
In conclusion, the idea of keeping more of our tax dollars at home isn't about being selfish or turning away from the world. It's about making sure that our tax dollars are used in the most effective and efficient way possible. It's about ensuring that all Canadians—whether they were born here or came here seeking a better life—have access to the services and opportunities they need to succeed.
Canada will always be a country that cares about the world. But we also need to care about our own citizens and ensure that we're getting the best value for our tax dollars. By rethinking how we spend our money, we can build a stronger, fairer Canada for everyone.
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham,
economy,
Facebook,
Football
SOCIAL MEDIA IS DEAD
By Joe Ingino
Editor/Publisher
ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000
Published Columns in Canada and The United States
“I live a dream in a nightmare world”
Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life
was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow.
- ONE DAY AT A TIME -
For the last 30 years. The newspaper industry has gone through some major transformations. I remember the introduction of desk top publishing.
When computer first came out. No, one could afford one or knew how to operate one. Most publishing houses still used the old big over head light and wax set ups. The super print shops had electronic presses away from the old mechanical ones.
I remember The Central first issue. It was put together by the folks that operated the big old press in Bowmanville. Every time they turned on the press. The whole building would rattle.
Since those days. Computers appeared to take over. Those that did not adapt. Went out of business.
I remember the Whitby Free Press. An antiquated press. Owners that did not really want to keep publishing. I approached them to buy them out and they would not budge.
Today they are gone much like The Oshawa Times, Metroland and a slew of small newspapers that had no real direction or clue on what they were doing.
Today, with the internet in every home. The newspaper industry seen it’s final challenge. Everyone predicted without knowing that the internet would replace hard copy.
In part it did for a very short while. For the publishers that did not understand the science behind the net. They fell victims of their own ignorance.
At the Central. We are experts in the technology. We, were one of two companies that brought the Internet to Durham. We seen the trends and the direction the internet is going.
The internet in it’s infancy... was primitive and had limited use. With the introduction of browsers. The internet took a whole new life. Purpose. This is where the commercialization started.
The browsers brought about the chats. From that point on. The internet began a bonanza for some and the downfall of the internet.
Today, the internet is nothing short of a communications public toilet.
From the millions of scams. To the never ending advertising. The internet has become a dangerous, unreliable place.
Today, social media appears to be the new way for many municipalities have chosen to post important notices and events.
This is in clear contravention of the Ontario Municipal Act. An Act that was set forth to safeguard from municipalities becoming the media and practicing censorship. The original intent of the act was to keep municipalities, accountable and transparent. An arms length away from becoming media.
The act is clear in it stipulates that municipalities need to publish public notices in a newspaper that prints at least once a week in the local economy.
Many Durham municipalities have confused and or altered the interpretation to only posting online and calling it wrongfully publishing.
Leaving that aside. Look at any municipal postings on social media. Look at the comments, likes and or views. Minimal at best. Why? Most people do not go on line to look up notices.
Many do not have or can afford the internet or a computer. Many seniors do not know how to navigate social media or very complex web site. Have you ever tried going on any municipal web sites. Impossible to find anything. Social media and the internet will soon transform.
You will have to pay for the internet and much like TV channels. You will have to pay for the use of browsers...Commercial/informative/business/science and so on. This will be the death of the internet much like cable TV was the death the open to air broadcasting. Stay tunes.
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham
Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Waste Recycling, Pickering and Durham Region
by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC,
FEC, CET, P. Eng.
Former Member of Parliament
Pickering-Scarborough East
In today’s world our energy needs are constantly increasing, especially our need for electrical energy.
Because of that, we need an energy source that is reliable, puts less stress on Nature, and is less challenging to the environment. At this point, we can certainly affirm that nuclear energy is one of these kinds of energy. Moreover, we have the technology, the plants and the science to support it. So let us put Canadian ingenuity to work for Canadians once again. Durham region is a hub of nuclear plants in Pickering and Clarington. So let us capitalize on them and keep them working at their best. In addition, it is high time that Durham region had a serious nuclear science center. We could facilitate and capitalize on the rapid evolution this science is likely to undergo if we work at developing it. Look at the example of the rapid strides made in electronics. In just a few decades we have progressed from the invention of the transistor to the very sophisticated integrated circuits and nanotechnologies which enjoy a broad range of applications in our daily lives today.
The relevant question is obvious: why can we not accomplish a similar transformation in the field of nuclear reactors? We see efforts to make electric vehicles with improved battery life, but we do not see any research or ideas on miniaturizing nuclear reactors, for vehicle use for example. Such reactors would certainly be better for powering vehicles that the proposed batteries. This suggestion may seem far-fetched, but there is evidence that it is possible.
The first nuclear submarine, for example, was created in the middle of the last century. In the early 1950’s, regardless of the challenges faced in developing and operating brand-new technology, Admiral Rickover and his team did not disappoint. They created a highly reliable nuclear reactor in a form-factor that would fit into a submarine hull with no more than a 28-foot (8.5 m) beam. This became known as the S1W reactor. Nautilus was launched and commissioned with this reactor in 1954.
Seventy years have passed and we have not seen further miniaturizations of reactors.
Therefore, I say, it is time to do some research in this direction right here in the Durham region. To do that, however, we need vision, political will and expertise, all of which is badly lacking in Canada at this time. Imagine having a car that will run for years without needing a fill up!
My thinking may be well ahead of its time, but I hope that the future will vindicate me.
Anyway, there are some signs that nuclear energy is in the spot light again, although not for the right reasons. Politicians promoting the use of electrical vehicles have mounted pressure for nuclear energy as an answer to the lack of electrical energy for the electric vehicle project.
So now, all levels of politicians who proudly professed the elimination of nuclear power plants in the past, especially those in Pickering, are doing an about-face, praising nuclear energy.
Both federal and provincial governments have officially recognized the importance of nuclear energy for meeting climate and energy needs. Even so, development and licensing of a new site can take years.
Ontario's electricity demand is rising and refurbishing nuclear plants is a way to meet it cleanly and cost-effectively.
The Pickering site, which is ideally positioned to supply the Greater Toronto Area with zero-carbon electricity around the clock, is licensed for over 3,000 MW of nuclear capacity.
Then, in a move likely unnoticed by most Ontarians, the province has inched closer to quite a change in energy policy. Witness the City of Pickering, which was posed to fully support the dismantling of the Pickering plant in 2020, is now enthusiastic to refurbish it.
What an about face in a few short years, by the same people on Pickering Council!
Doesn’t their deep expertise amaze you?
Of course, nobody seems to be talking or even thinking about the recycling of spent nuclear fuel at any level of government. They seem oblivious to this national treasure in full view.
All the most vociferous so-called experts are ready to burry the spent nuclear fuel. Experts in political science rather than nuclear science, they burry their heads in the proverbial sand when they advocate for burying spent fuel. Today we have the technology to recycle spent fuel, thus reducing its radioactivity and getting far more energy out of it.
Over the last decade, my own efforts as an MP and Professional Engineer, an endangered species in the House of Commons in Canada; and especially the efforts of Professor Emeritus Peter Ottensmeyer have been ignored.
For the record, Peter Ottensmeyer is Professor Emeritus, past Chair of Medical Biophysics at the University of Toronto, and Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. His educational background is in engineering physics and metallurgy with a postgraduate education in solid state physics and biophysics.
The bureaucrats from the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) continue to blindly pursue the idea of burying the spent fuel even thought the Nuclear Fuel Act has a provision for a: “Change in Approach
Marginal note: New approach — technical innovation
20 (2) If a new technological method is developed that has been the subject of a scientific and technical review by experts from international governmental organizations that deal with nuclear matters and has received their support, the waste management organization may propose, in its triennial report, a new approach for the management of nuclear fuel waste that is based on that new method.”Isn’t it time for Canada to become a leader in the nuclear field once again, by recycling the spent nuclear fuel rather than burying it? We are sitting on a treasure trove in Pickering, and these clowns call it waste!
Apart from legacy hydro dams, Ontario’s nuclear fleet makes the cheapest electricity in the province, while abundant natural fuel and a local supply chain shore up our energy security and economy.
With some of the lowest fuel costs of any thermal power plant in the world, revenue from Pickering supports nearly 5,000 high-quality jobs at the plant and thousands more in the surrounding area.The sudden love the Ford government has developed for nuclear energy, despite MPP Peter Bethlenfalvy’s former lack of enthusiasm, is also noted.
The Canada Infrastructure Bank (CIB) is loaning almost a billion dollars to OPG to build the country’s first grid-scale, small modular reactor (SMR) in Clarington, Ontario.
In conclusion, now that Ontario has entered its first energy crunch in decades, and refurbishments at Darlington will be wrapping up, the rationale for moving refurbishment workers to Pickering is stronger than ever.
My hope is that politicians at all levels in Pickering will be able to secure a bright future for nuclear energy for the benefit of the city, the province, and Canada.
It is up to you to check on them!
LinkedIn Isn’t the Place to Express Your Frustrations and Anger
By Nick Kossovan
"The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on." - Arab proverb.
If you spend time on LinkedIn, you'll undoubtedly notice the platform has become overrun with barking dogs—job seekers who are frustrated and angry—while employers keep moving on, looking after their self-interests.
Job seekers expressing their "emotions" online aren't doing themselves any favours. It's common knowledge employers Google candidates and check their LinkedIn activity to determine whether they're interview-worthy. An employer's reputation and brand are represented by its employees, making it prudent to vet candidates' online behaviour by looking for red flags such as:
· Offensive behaviour
· Narcissistic behaviour
· Content designed to provoke (trolling)
· False information
· Negative (read: bashing) posts about former employers or employers in general.
The last red flag is worth noting as employer-related negative posts are increasingly prevalent. Some posts I've read come across as if the poster is waging a holy war against employers.
Three reasons you shouldn't complain online:
1. Complaining is toxic.
2. Complaining is not leading.
3. Complaining keeps you stuck where you are.
"Don't be overheard complaining... not even to yourself." - Marcus Aurelius.
Describing something—an event, an experience, a person—negatively (complaining) without indicating the next steps or plans to fix the problem or yourself is easy. The act of complaining requires little thought and no action.
What good has complaining ever done? Publicly venting your frustrations and anger may feel like you're "sticking it to the man," but does it change your circumstances, increase your chances of landing a job, or make you happier?
Self-proclaiming career coaches and resume writers serve their self-interest by telling job seekers that the reason they're not getting interviews is because their resume sucks.
While this may be true, it's rarely mentioned that employers may be turned off by a job seeker's online behaviour.
I've met many job seekers with a rockstar-like resume, frustrated they weren't getting interviews. After reading some of their LinkedIn comments, I can see why employers aren't contacting them. I know of two instances where a job offer was rescinded due to the to-be employee's online behaviour. While your resume is important, what's more important—critical to landing interviews—is your digital footprint.
Employers will disregard your candidacy no matter how skilled or experienced you are if they feel your online behaviour may affect their brand and reputation; hence, your online behaviour has consequences. Whether those consequences benefit or hinder your job search is entirely up to you. Keep your rants, vents, and anger about employers and the job market off LinkedIn and other social media platforms. While your feelings may be valid, your behaviour isn't.
More than ever, Image is everything!
Instead of showing your network and employers your armchair opinions about how employers don't know how to hire, show why you should be hired. Do not allow your ego to lead you to think your opinions and rants will influence employers' hiring decisions. On the other hand, while complaining may feel cathartic, it hinders your job search efforts because:
Complaining is never a good look.
When you post complaints on LinkedIn, you put your negativity on full display for your network and employers to see. Furthermore, you're publicly biting the hands that you want to feed you. Regardless of how you frame a "rant" or "venting," it'll likely convey a bitter, angry, or entitlement tone, which isn't an impression you want to give to your network and employers.
· "Wow, this person would be difficult to work with."
· "This person has a poor attitude."
· "Why's this person painting all employers with the same brush?"
· "This person is playing the 'I'm a victim!' card."
· "This person needs to stop blaming everyone."
Appearing bitter and angry towards employers will hinder your job search.
Complaining in public shows a lack of emotional control and judgment.
Managing your emotions and responding appropriately to challenging situations is a crucial aspect of being a professional. Complaining about your job search difficulties or criticizing employer hiring practices on LinkedIn shows a lack of self-control and judgment of the possible consequences of your online behaviour.
Understandably, employers seek employees who can remain calm under pressure, handle setbacks gracefully, and project a positive, solution-focused attitude. Publicly expressing your frustrations suggests you might have trouble handling workplace challenges or negative feedback.
Complaining makes you appear entitled.
Complaining gives the impression that you feel entitled to a job and have unrealistic expectations, which are turnoffs.
Employers gravitate towards candidates they feel will be grateful for the opportunity, eager to contribute, and committed to achieving success. When you complain, you appear focused more on what you believe you are entitled to than what you can offer.
LinkedIn is the most powerful tool you have at your disposal to reach employers. Hence, you want to project an image that attracts employers as opposed to repelling employers, which is what you're doing when you complain about employers and the job market.
Bashing employers on LinkedIn won't change how they look after their self-interests. Focus on your self-interests; to find an employer you'll want to align your career with. Barking at employers won't stop the caravan from moving on.
________________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com
OUR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS ARE BEING ELIMINATED AND WE ARE ALLOWING IT TO HAPPEN, SHAME ON US
It’s unfortunate but the majority of we the people, pay absolutely little attention to our municipal politics.
Only when municipal elections come around every four years do some of us think about voting and then less than 50% of eligible voters actually vote, and probably half of those voters do not known whoor why they are voting for someone, they just want to be able to say they voted.
If you were to ask people who their ward councillor is, most people couldn’t tell you. Why, because wepeople are too busy with our lives and blind to what’s happening in our city, town or community. Wetake little interest in municipal affairs
People use the excuse for not voting, “why vote, they just do what they want”. Well that’s our mistake.
Municipal politics are the one place that we can actually change things. Mayors and councillors actuallyhave to answer to us, the people not a party leader. So why are we not making them accountable?
For these past years Municipal Councils across Ontario consisting of mayors and councillors who we elected, have slowly and sneakily been re-writing the by-laws to remove our rights at council meetings.
Our so called representatives have voted by-laws aimed against we the people such as some listed;
1. reducing the allotted time each citizen can speak (delegate) to a topic on the agenda
2. banning neighbouring municipal citizens from delegating to a topic on the agenda
3. removing an open question period (a time allotted anyone to speak to the current agenda)
4. removed the right for a citizen to have a topic added to the agenda, when submitted within
the required time prior to the council meeting
5. banning the right of a neighbouring citizen to have a topic added to the agenda when
submitted within the required time prior to the council meeting
6. barring the media from filming or recording the council meeting unless approved by two
coucillors and voted on by council prior to the council meeting
7. barring all members of the public from filming or recording the council meeting
8. banning members of the public from bringing placards, signs or flags of any kind to council
9. banning public show of support by applauding or public booing if opposed to a topic
10. trespassing ‘members of the public, that exercise their Civil and Human Rights”, from all
publicbuildings for a period of time
It would seem that the elected members of council(s) who have voted these by-law changes
in, are in direct conflict with the “Constitution of Canada” and “Civil and Human Rights” and they, the members should be challenged.
Also, 150 of 444 of our Municipal Councils, the Mayors and Councillors we elected, are now asking for more power. They want the power to fire their elected colleague and have that person prohibited from running in the next election. They want this done through an integrity commissioner so council can deny they fired an elected councillor.
People Wake Up, Pay Attention, your Municipal Council meetings are usually held once a month, same week day of the month and the public can attend, just check on the internet for your city’s web site, council meetings and calendar for date and time, agendas are also posted.. If you are not able to attend, must councils do live streaming so you can watch at home, you can even watch past meeting.
Remember, Silence Solves Nothing, It’s Time To Stand Up, Speak
Up For Your Rights, Before They’re Gone. Keep Democracy Alive
Friends, Neighbours, and fellow Canadians
By Lisa Robinson
I stand before you today, not just as an elected official but as a deeply concerned citizen who believes that our beloved city—and municipalities across Ontario and Canada—are heading in a dangerously wrong direction. It is with a heavy heart and a clear sense of duty that I address the serious concerns and allegations I must make against my Council, the Corporation of the City of Pickering, and other levels of government.
Some of our city leaders have strayed far from the principles they were elected to uphold. They have shown a blatant disregard for the constitutional rights of our citizens—freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of the press are being trampled upon in pursuit of ideological and personal agendas. Our bylaws are being broken
repeatedly, catering to special interest groups and developers while the voices of ordinary citizens are being silenced.
In recent months, Pickering council has introduced draconian, undemocratic policies that limit public participation and transparency within our beloved chambers. Delegation time limits have been slashed from 10 minutes to 5, the public is no longer allowed to record public meetings, and the media too is barred from recording unless given a two-thirds majority of the council's approval. And already council has shown their true colours by voting against a media outlet who holds opposing views. Residents from outside of Pickering, including Durham residents, are prohibited from participating in our meetings unless the topic is approved by a two-thirds majority—this, despite we contract with their government and the fact that four of our council members sit on Durham Region Council.
Even Pickering residents are now silenced from speaking openly, freely in our chambers unless their topic has been scrutinized under a microscope and approval given by a mover and seconder and a 2/3rds vote. Let's be clear: if the council doesn’t want to hear what you have to say, or if they don’t like your opinions, they will silence you. They are effectively forbidding you from having a voice. This is not just a disregard for free speech—it's an outright attack on your right to be heard.
Let’s talk about the new, nebulous trespass policies—what I call the “hurt feelings bylaw.” These draconian rules give the council the power to banish anyone based on flimsy excuses like social media posts, language, tone of voice, or even what someone is wearing if it offends someone. This isn’t just a policy; it’s a blatant attempt to silence dissent, crush opposing views, and manipulate the narrative to fit their agenda,views, and control the narrative. We’ve seen what looks like outrageous manipulation in the city's YouTube feeds of our council and committee meetings—time jumps, white noise, and possible signs of audio tampering. When I pushed for an independent third party to record our meetings to ensure moving forward that these recordings were accurate and transparent, since the public is no longer allowed to record, the City of Pickering flatly refused. This isn’t just poor governance—it’s outright tyranny.
Our councils and governments are intoxicated with power. It seems to give them a perverse pleasure to divide us, to make us feel helpless, to instill fear in those who dare to hold opposing opinions. This toxic culture is ruining relationships, tearing families apart, and forcing people to live in constant fear of speaking their minds, their truths. This nightmare needs to end, and it will only end if we, the people, rise above the nonsensical nonsense they are trying to impose.
It’s absolutely scandalous how taxpayer dollars are being squandered on frivolous spending at every level of government, while critical needs like providing clean drinking water to our First Nations communities are callously ignored. Despite countless failed promises of keeping our duty to consult, as of this past July, 31 First Nations communities remain under long-term drinking water advisories. This is not just a failure—it's a betrayal. We hear endless land acknowledgments, but these are nothing more than empty words, lip service, when not backed by real action. Our First Nations people deserve access to clean, safe drinking water, and it is our solemn duty to push and deliver on that promise no matter what level of government. But the disgrace doesn't stop there. Our homeless population is increasing and our food banks are struggling to keep food on the shelves while our governments and city officials, who are supposed to protect and serve us, are instead taxing us deeper into poverty. Yet, their wages and benefits continue to increase, while they sit idly by, letting our most vulnerable citizens suffer in silence.
Our government continues to waste taxpayer dollars on lavish perks for elected officials and city staff, sending funds abroad to other Countries without addressing the suffering of our own people. Millions of dollars are being funneled into consultants and reports that are hidden from the public, and thousands are spent on politicians to attend events that serve only to benefit the politicians and the vendors who wine and dine them for future business. Maybe the Premiere could put legislation in place that would disallow any elected official and city staff from receiving gifts and benefits from developers, vendors, special interest groups or anyone lobbying the governments for business. Maybe Politicians should wear these lobbyist logos on their jackets to show transparency of who supports them, so the people can keep track of how they vote and see where their loyalty lies. Rob Ford was a true champion of fiscal responsibility, unafraid to call out the wasteful perks enjoyed by city employees. He was determined to keep politicians and public servants in line, ensuring that every dollar of taxpayer money was spent wisely.
This corruption must end. The City of Pickering on top of all of their wasteful spending is also vindictive, hateful and voted to spend $200,000 of tax payers dollars to fight me in a judicial review, instead of paying me $15,000 plus in lost salary that I was financially sanctioned on the recommendation by Principles Integrity for doing my job on behalf of my constituents. It's deeply troubling that Integrity Commissioners, who hold significant power over elected officials, are themselves unelected and paid by the very municipalities they oversee. This creates an inherent conflict of interest, where their loyalty may lie more with those who sign their paychecks than with the principles of fairness and accountability. I ask, do we really need them, They have only been implemented in the last few years, yet they wield immense influence over our democratic processes. Council and the Corporation of the City of Pickering and all levels of government need to remember that it is your money, meant to be used judiciously for the common good, not for self-serving agendas. This is not just mismanagement—it’s a criminal neglect of duty.
In Pickering, the Integrity Commissioner has audaciously pushed for and was granted changes to our policies and procedures to ensure their Integrity reports cannot be questioned. This is nothing short of a blatant effort to shield their actions from scrutiny and undermine transparency and public trust. When you realize that Principles Integrity, the firm the Corporation of the City pays and relies on, is serving 65 other municipalities, it’s evident that their impartiality is severely compromised.
In my personal experience, the Integrity Commissioner has proven to be untrustworthy and biased. They have repeatedly lied, failed to investigate complaints thoroughly, and refused to answer any questions from those they accuse, effectively preventing individuals from clearing their names. Let me be absolutely clear: this is a rigged system. The integrity of a process where those responsible for upholding fairness are instead serving the corporation's interests, not ours, is fundamentally flawed. It’s high time our Premier steps in and enacts legislation to protect the public’s interest and prevent officials from manipulating the system to shield their misconduct. We need reforms that ensure accountability and transparency, not a façade of integrity designed to protect the corrupt.
In Pickering and throughout Canada we are also witnessing a disturbing trend where the right to personal dignity is being stripped away from men, women, boys, and girls in spaces that should be safe bathrooms, change rooms. People are being forced to share these spaces with members of the opposite sex, leading to widespread discomfort and real psychological harm to some. What’s even more troubling is that only members 18 years and older at our Recreation Complex are protected to use spaces aligned with their biological sex, leaving children and those who can’t afford memberships vulnerable and unprotected from these same rights. This is not just unfair; in my opinion it’s disgusting. We are discriminating against the most vulnerable among us—our children and those who lack the means to protect themselves are having to beg to use a biological changeroom. This is inhumane
It’s absolutely absurd that these changes have only emerged since COVID. For as long as we’ve existed, nobody has ever had to beg for the basic right to use their biological washroom. It’s disturbing beyond belief that anyone ever thought this was a good idea. What we’re witnessing is a catastrophic lapse in common sense, leading to dangerous consequences. Globally, there have been too many tragic incidents in these spaces - these aren’t isolated events, and they can’t be ignored. This isn’t about politics; it’s about the safety and well-being of our citizens. We must safeguard their right to personal dignity and stop sacrificing them on the altar under the guise of political correctness. I urge Premier Ford and all members of parliament to implement common-sense legislation before it’s too late. I am certain that neither Premier Ford nor any other parliamentarian want to change in spaces with children, let alone children of the opposite sex, and if you do then your values will become questionable. Our citizens absolutely deserve to be safe and our children protected, and we cannot allow this misguided policy to continue
With all of the bullying, intimidation, threats, attacks on my character, sexual harassment, and psychological harassment that I have had to endure, and the corruption, collusion, and what I consider bribery that I have witnessed, I have suggested that all members of the council be investigated for wrongdoing. Yet not a single member—not even the mayor—would second that motion. What does that tell you? It’s very telling when those who cry the loudest about integrity refuse to have their own actions scrutinized. If they have nothing to hide, why didn’t they support an investigation? The silence from council speaks volumes.
We are also witnessing a troubling trend of our city catering to special interest groups at the expense of our own procedures and bylaws, principles of fairness, and equality. Time and again, procedures and bylaws have been selectively enforced or outright ignored to serve the agendas of a few, rather than the common good. Rules for me, but not for thee. This selective enforcement has not only broken the trust between the government and the people but has also erode the rule of law in our city.
Over the past few months, my mayor and fellow councillors have been participating in a downright dangerous game to lobby the provincial government to change the Municipal Act so they can remove a sitting elected member. This is a direct attack on democracy, where the people—not politicians—should have the power to decide who represents them. If this change is allowed, it opens the door to unchecked abuse of power, where dissenting voices can be silenced at will. It’s a blatant attempt to consolidate control and eliminate opposition, turning our councils into echo chambers for those in power. It's not only happening in Pickering but in other municipalities, and any elected official pushing for this should step down immediately for betraying the very democratic process they were elected to protect. This move isn’t just undemocratic; it’s authoritarian. We must fiercely oppose any effort to strip the people of their right to have a voice and to choose their leaders. Our duty is to serve, not to rule. It is also disgraceful to see politicians at all levels of government using name-calling and shameful rhetoric to silence and intimidate those who dare to speak up. These tactics are designed to stop people from expressing their concerns and to create an environment of fear.
Let me be absolutely clear—this disgraceful behavior starts at the top with Trudeau and you, Premier Ford. You've set the tone, and now my mayor and fellow councillors think it’s perfectly acceptable to stoop to your level and It’s no wonder that this garbage has trickled down to fake Facebook accounts and keyboard warriors who think they can hide behind screens and hurl insults without consequence to those with opposing views within our communities. You’ve all set a shameful example.
It is absolutely appalling to see my fellow politicians behave this way spreading vile rhetoric to silence and intimidate anyone who dares to oppose them and speak their truth. These pathetic tactics are nothing but a coward's way to stifle free speech and breed fear. Only spineless cowards hide behind such childish nonsense. Real leaders engage in real conversations, they listen, and they address issues with respect and integrity.
Those who stoop to name-calling and character assassination have no place in leadership. If Politicians can’t uphold thedignity of their office, then step down. Because this kind of toxic behavior is a stain on our democracy, and we are better than that. I have personally faced relentless bullying, intimidation, and threats from my mayor and fellow councilors, including financial sanctions, name-calling, and persistent lies attacking my character—all because I am standing up for what is right – just like I am here today. But these are not just attacks on me; they are attacks on the very principles of integrity, honesty, and accountability that should guide all Politicians actions. In my opinion, our municipality, like many others, needs to be torn down and rebuilt, giving power back to the people, where it rightfully belongs. And The rot doesn’t stop at our city councils, provincial, federal government, or other institutions. Historically, Canada had defamation laws and journalistic standards that aimed to prevent the spread of false information. However, with the rise of digital media and the push for sensationalism, these standards have eroded, allowing biased and misleading reports to flourish. The CBC and other journalists have become a disgrace, promoting rumors using clickbait titles instead of investigating the truth. They have become another group paid to report certain narratives that fit their agenda, rather than the facts. This is not journalism—it is sensationalism, or if I may be so crude to say BS, and it’s nothing other than a betrayal of the public’s trust. I call on Premier Ford to bring back Legislation that demands accurate reporting by all journalists based on facts and hold media accountable for their role in spreading misinformation. I would also like to ask Premier Ford, to have a serious conversation with Prime Minister
Trudeau about the millions of dollars being funneled into the CBC. This government funding looks more like bribery than support for unbiased journalism. If we're truly committed to media transparency and integrity, we need to stop propping up an organization that increasingly serves as a mouthpiece rather than a check on power. Let's put an end to this questionable financial relationship and restore faith in our public institutions.
It is also disheartening to see how DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives, which were intended to foster inclusivity, have instead become sources of division and exclusion. Globally, DEI policies are being banned as they are increasingly recognized for their counterproductive effects—fostering division rather than unity and indoctrinating individuals to adhere to a specific narrative. In Pickering, DEI is being enforced across all areas of the corporation, including the hiring process, which is deeply troubling. Such policies should not lead to discrimination based on skin color, religious beliefs, or sexual preferences.
I was the only one who voted against its implementation because, as a leader, I recognize the importance of seeing what everyone else can see but I can think differently and question if what is being presented is universally beneficial or not. Our approach must reflect true inclusivity, promoting equality and respect for all individuals. The solution is straightforward: treat everyone equally and fairly based on merit and character, united under the red and white flag of our country—the Canadian flag. We should not be segregating people into groups by the colour of their skin, religious beliefs, or sexual preferences which are only designed to divide us. This approach will ensure that our policies genuinely serve the common good rather than creating new forms of exclusion. It’s our duty as politicians to remain in a state of neutrality and not cause division by a hierarchy of beliefs and chaos.
This is not about being left or right—it is about what is right and what is wrong. It is about common sense for common people. The name-calling we see from politicians at all levels of government used to silence and shame those who dare to speak up, is disgusting. Only cowards hide behind such childish rhetoric, not leaders. And those who engage in it should apologize or step down, for they are not fit to lead. Our municipalities need to be torn down and rebuilt with integrity, transparency, and respect for the people they serve. We must return power to where it belongs—in the hands of the people Our children deserve to grow up free from political agendas that impose adult issues on them, especially when it comes to making life-altering decisions about their bodies. We cannot allow children to be pressured into choices that involve irreversible hormone blockers or surgeries that remove healthy body parts. These are decisions with lifelong consequences that no child should be forced to make.
Let our children be children. Let them learn and grow in an environment of respect, dignity, and safety, where their innocence is preserved and their well-being is prioritized. It's our duty to protect their future, ensuring they have the time and freedom to discover who they are without the weight of adult controversies on their young shoulders. We should be teaching our children that no safe adult will ask them to keep secrets. As for our government claiming transparency and accountability these have become mere buzzwords, not practices. We were not elected to cater to developers, special interest groups or make friends with those with deep pockets following along with the status quo. Yet, we see our leaders doing exactly that, pushing through agendas that benefit the few at the expense of the many. We need to be a government that serves the people, not one that serves itself. We need to be leaders who listen, who act with integrity, and who put the public good above all else.
We need to restore transparency, accountability, and trust in our institutions. And we need to stand up to the bullies, the corrupt officials, and the special interest groups who are trying to take away our rights and freedoms This is not a fight I take on lightly, but it is one that must be fought. For the sake of our city, our province, and our country, its people, and future generations to come. We must stand up against this abuse of power, this corruption, and this betrayal of public trust. We must restore integrity and trust in our government, and I am committed to leading that charge. Together, we can bring about the change that is so desperately needed. Serving the people, not ruling them. Strength does not lie in the absence of fear but in the courage to face it head on and rise above it
"Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"
From Renting to Home Ownership
By Theresa Grant
Real Estate Columnist
Home ownership can seem like an impossible dream for some, and others have it on their must achieve by a certain age, list.
As with all things in life, it’s better to know all the ins and outs of attaining home ownership so you can make an informed decision as to whether or not it’s for you.
What will you need and where do you start? Well, if you have family members or a close friend that could share their journey to home ownership with you, that is great. If, however you don’t, it’s always best to consult with a professional. A Realtor, a Mortgage Broker, or a Financial Services agent, can all help you map out a plan to home ownership. Very often the institution that you bank with will be more than happy to set you up with a free consultation to discuss what exactly you are looking to achieve and then help you to get started on the exciting path to home ownership.
The two biggest things needed are an income that will comfortably cover not just your mortgage but all of your expenses, and a good credit rating. The lending institution will look at how much you make versus how much you owe to creditors. This is called the debt service ratio. There are two calculations when lenders are running the numbers. They first look at your income as it relates to covering the mortgage, property taxes and the heating of the property. If you are wanting to purchase a condo, half of the condo fees are also included in this calculation. This initial figure cannot exceed 39% of your income. The second calculation is more encompassing. It involves all of your debts like car loan, line of credit, credit cards, anything you have financing on. Given that this calculation is broader and takes everything into account, it stands to reason that his number would be higher. This number comes in at 44% of your income. These figures are based on Canada Mortgage and Housing guidelines.
Take a look at your credit report. If it’s good, then just keep doing what you’ve been doing. If it’s less than stellar, there are a few things that may be affecting it negatively that you can change. Making your payments on time is a big one. Creditors like to see that you take the repayment of your debt seriously and make your payments responsibly. Utilization of your available credit is another big one. If a lender sees that you are almost maxed out on your cards, even if you pay them every month, it tells the lender you rely on the cards heavily. The more you can pay down on your loans and cards, the higher your score will go.
It can be a good idea to sit down a year or so before you want to purchase and make a check list. It could look like this, pay off the lowest balance of at least one credit card. Make sure all payments over the next year are on time. Do not take any new credit cards or loans out over the next year. Pay off anything you can but leave the account open. The reason you leave the account open is because it shows lenders that you have the credit available to you, but you don’t need to utilize it.
You will need a down payment. That will be whatever you can save after paying all of your expenses. Often people will move from their nice large apartment with all the amenities, to a much smaller space with no amenities to be able to save for a down payment for a year or two. The minimum requirement for a down payment in Ontario is 5% of the purchase price of the home. There are many things to take into consideration when it comes to home ownership and how to attain it. Listen, ask questions, and always consult a professional.
Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















