Saturday, December 7, 2024
Community Newspapers: Connecting and Supporting Local Communities
Community Newspapers:
Connecting and Supporting Local Communities
By Dale Jodoin
Community newspapers are a vital part of neighborhoods and towns, delivering local news to millions of Canadians every week. They serve more than just an informational role; they are key in connecting people, supporting local groups, and fostering collaboration. Across Canada, nearly 14 million copies of community newspapers are distributed weekly, often free of charge, making them an essential resource for many.
Community newspapers provide straightforward news, helping readers stay informed about events and issues in their area. They act as a watchdog for local governance, holding politicians accountable by ensuring transparency in reporting. This role is critical to maintaining trust and credibility, as unbiased reporting empowers communities and encourages informed decision-making.
However, concerns about political influence over some media outlets have sparked discussions about the importance of journalistic independence. Readers expect community newspapers to provide accurate, impartial news rather than being swayed by political agendas. Independence ensures newspapers can continue their role as a reliable source of truth and a platform for public accountability.
Beyond reporting, community newspapers play an essential role in supporting local nonprofit organizations and community groups. These groups often rely on newspapers to raise awareness about their work, promote events, and recruit volunteers.
Local food banks, for example, use newspapers to inform the public about distribution times and how to donate. Environmental groups share sustainability tips and event details, while other organizations highlight community resources, such as free educational programs or mental health services.
Affordable advertising and feature stories in community newspapers allow nonprofits to reach a wide audience without straining their budgets. Public service announcements and advocacy pieces also provide these groups with a platform to communicate their mission and needs effectively.
Community newspapers are a hub for building connections between local groups, businesses, and individuals. They encourage collaboration by sharing success stories of partnerships that benefit the community. For instance, a story about a local grocery store teaming up with a food bank to provide meals for families not only informs the public but also inspires similar initiatives.
Additionally, newspapers help bridge gaps between local authorities and residents by sharing essential guidelines and updates. They educate readers about rules, such as food bank eligibility criteria, recycling practices, and safety protocols for community events. This information simplifies processes and ensures that people know how to access the help and resources they need.
Community newspapers often serve as a platform for highlighting important local issues. Coverage of topics such as homelessness, public safety, or environmental challenges brings these issues to the forefront, encouraging community involvement. By reporting on these matters, newspapers motivate individuals and groups to take action and seek solutions.
For example, stories about cleanup efforts in parks or volunteer recruitment for local shelters show the impact of collective action. These stories also provide recognition to those working tirelessly to improve their communities.
Community newspapers are more than just a source of news. They act as a cornerstone for local engagement, bringing people together and supporting those in need. Their commitment to unbiased reporting, community support, and advocacy ensures they remain a valuable resource for towns and neighborhoods across Canada.
By connecting people and sharing stories of positive change, community newspapers continue to strengthen the fabric of society, ensuring local voices are heard and local challenges are addressed.
Labels:
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham,
economy,
Facebook
Saturday, November 30, 2024
The Baby Boomer Generation: Facing Loss and Finding Meaning Life and Loss: Navigating Grief and Finding Purpose
The Baby Boomer Generation: Facing Loss and Finding Meaning
Life and Loss:
Navigating Grief and Finding Purpose
By Dale Jodoin
As the Baby Boomer generation enters its later years, loss has become an inescapable part of life. The passing of parents, siblings, spouses, and friends forces us to face the fragility of life. These losses don’t just mark the end of relationships—they prompt deep reflection on our own mortality and the impact we’ve had on those around us.
Loss is universal, yet it feels deeply personal when it happens to us. For Baby Boomers, saying goodbye to aging parents is often a poignant milestone. It’s a moment that shifts the family dynamic, leaving many to step into the role of the eldest generation. This shift often comes with a profound sense of vulnerability, as the people who once protected and guided us are no longer there.
But losing a sibling or close friend carries a different kind of weight. These are the people who shared our lives, our secrets, and our memories. Their absence reminds us that time is fleeting and that even the strongest bonds can be broken by death.
The loss of a spouse, however, is perhaps the most life-altering experience. A partner represents a shared life, a co-writer of your story. When they’re gone, the world feels quieter, emptier. Tasks that once seemed mundane, like preparing meals or watching TV, now highlight the void left behind.
As death approaches, many people find themselves turning inward. For some, this means reaching out to faith or spirituality. Even those who’ve spent decades away from religion often find themselves praying or seeking forgiveness at the end of life. The prospect of leaving unfinished business—whether with loved ones or a higher power—can weigh heavily on the mind.
Forgiveness becomes a recurring theme in these moments. Old grudges, once seen as insurmountable, suddenly seem trivial in the face of mortality. Yet, the desire for reconciliation often comes late, leaving little time to rebuild the connections that were lost.
It’s a reminder to settle disputes and mend relationships while there’s still time. Whether through heartfelt conversations or simple gestures, letting go of resentment can bring peace not only to the dying but also to those left behind.
For parents, the loss of a child is a grief that defies explanation. It goes against the natural order of life and leaves a wound that never fully heals. The sense of helplessness is overwhelming, as there’s no way to shield a child from the inevitability of death.
This type of loss carries a ripple effect through families. It’s a grief that unites, yet isolates. Support from others who’ve experienced similar pain can be invaluable, as only they can truly understand the depth of this heartbreak.
As death touches those around us, it also forces us to examine our own lives. What legacy are we leaving behind? How will we be remembered? These are questions many Baby Boomers are asking as they approach their later years.
For some, the answers lie in revisiting faith or seeking a deeper connection with the world around them. A quiet moment in nature, a visit to a place of worship, or simply spending time with loved ones can provide clarity.
Others focus on practical matters, like organizing their finances or writing a will. These steps, though sometimes uncomfortable, can ease the burden on those left behind. They’re acts of love that show consideration for the future.
Grieving is a deeply personal process, and no two people experience it the same way. For some, the pain is overwhelming, making it difficult to move forward. In these moments, reaching out for help is essential.
Support groups, whether in person or online, offer a safe space to share stories and emotions. They remind us that grief is a shared experience and that there’s strength in leaning on others. Friends and family can also provide comfort, even if it’s just through their presence.
It’s important to remember that grief doesn’t have a timeline. Healing is not about forgetting—it’s about learning to live with the loss and finding ways to honor the memory of those who’ve passed.
Despite the inevitability of death, life remains a gift to be cherished. Each day offers an opportunity to create new memories, strengthen relationships, and find joy in the small moments. Whether it’s laughing with grandchildren, exploring a new hobby, or simply enjoying a sunrise, these moments remind us of the beauty that still exists.
At the same time, it’s crucial to address the practical aspects of life’s end. Writing down wishes, resolving conflicts, and communicating openly with loved ones can provide a sense of closure. It ensures that when the time comes, you can leave with fewer regrets and a clearer conscience.
Grief is a reflection of love. The pain we feel when someone dies is a testament to the bond we shared with them. While the loss is devastating, it’s also a reminder of the impact they had on our lives.
As we navigate this journey, it’s important to remember that we’re not alone. Others have walked this path before us and will walk it after us. Together, we can find strength in our shared humanity, creating a legacy of love and compassion for those who will carry on after us.
Live fully. Love deeply. And when the end comes, face it with grace and gratitude for the life you’ve lived.
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham
Ward 2 oshawa the forgotten people…
ward 2 oshawa
the forgotten people...
By Joe Ingino
B.A. Psychology
Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers
ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000
Published Columns in Canada and The United States
For those that read my column on a regular basis. will know that I am a believer in the democratic process when it comes to electing government officials. In the same breath. You, also know where I stand with the quality of the candidates that we elect in office.
The quality of living in the City of Oshawa keeps getting worst. Taxes keep going up. One would have thought that at the 2022 municipal election the electorate would have voted for change. Almost a reset button on Oshawa’s quality of life. NO - instead the electorate kept all the councillor and the incumbent Mayor and only changed one.
I still can’t believe the results and the outcome. To vote back in a Mayor that has turned downtown Oshawa into Durham’s capital for the homeless, drug use, drug trade and prostitution.
I am beyond words. Only to strengthen my position on how the electorate votes.
Take for example the only change in the municipal roster. Ward 2, City Councillor, Jim Lee.
At first I was excited. I thought finally someone with some credentials and a some what proven work history. I had hope for the ward with an under used airport. With a ward that has no representation. At the region, Regional and City councillor Tito-Dante Marimpietri has had numerous terms as the ward 2 rep. How has the ward benefitted? Anyone’s guess.
As for Lee. He has shown respect and visited my office once since elected. I appreciated that.... as Tito in his God knows how many terms... maybe visited his local city newspaper once or twice out of the many years he has been elected.
Lee, in my opinion. Has become institutionalized. The do nothing and say even less, gets you elected time and time again appears.
Lee instead of taking this golden opportunity to make a name for himself. He has opted to cushion his pension and play by the municipal coalitions rules. Say nothing, support what the coalition supports and support corporate prejudice and political vindication against anyone that challenges the status quo at the City of Oshawa offices. If I am wrong. I will be the first to apologize. One question. What has Lee done for ward 2 in his half term.
The City position on doing business with the 30 serving newspaper is ignored due to political vendetta. They claim they support local small businesses. We are living proof of their bias, prejudice and lack of support for local small businesses. This is in part why there are so many vacancies in our core. NO SUPPORT. The City of Oshawa is not inclusive but selective.
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham,
economy,
Facebook,
Football,
game
NEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ON ITS WAY -MERCHANTS CONCERNED OVER LOSS OF PARKING-
NEW DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ON ITS WAY
-MERCHANTS CONCERNED OVER LOSS OF PARKING-
By Dean Hickey
THE PRINCIPLES WHICH GUIDE the approval of any new development within the city’s downtown core will, by necessity, demand a parallel review of the existing parking capacity upon which so many businesses and residents rely.
With the future of Lot 4 now being debated by council, many among the various property owners, merchants, and those who frequent the area will doubtless be concerned as to the potential reduction in the number of available spots.
The Economic and Development Services committee decided in early November to declare the surface parking lot at the north side of Athol Street, between Simcoe and Centre Streets, as ‘surplus’ in an effort to engage with those seeking to develop the property into something far beyond its current use.
Due to the nature of the process which surrounds such negotiations and decision making, most of what has so-far been discussed has taken place in closed session, and the details have yet to be disclosed. It is known, however, that staff did recommend the approval of a specific proposal having been brought forward as a result of a targeted RFP (Request for Proposals) process, whereby consideration was given to a few select proponents.
Committee members took a publicly recorded vote on the matter and, oddly enough, those who were opposed to the staff recommendation were Ward 4 councillors Rick Kerr and Derek Giberson. Both men represent the area that encompasses the downtown, and they are known as having competing visions for the city. Those differences will undoubtedly play a role in their responses to a recent petition that has been submitted to city hall on the issue of parking and the losses that may occur.
A group of downtown merchants have signed the petition that reads as follows: “We hereby write, sign, and validate this document as a request…with regards to the acceptance of such project wherein consideration is given to the development of a Parking Lot in the area of Lot 4 in downtown Oshawa. The shortage of parking is NEGATIVELY affecting businesses and is resulting in loss of customers and loss of business revenue. Countless customers have expressed their frustration with the lack of parking, and after circling the downtown area and wasting over fifteen minutes, they give up and go somewhere else. If you want to see businesses grow and thrive in downtown Oshawa, you MUST provide parking. We NEED this parking lot to be built to accommodate customers driving from outside of the area and to generate more productivity in the neighbourhood and provide the potential of expansion for future projects. This is a basic necessity.”
One property owner I spoke with, on condition of anonymity for the sake of his tenants, said “Anyone can see we have parking issues downtown. The City doesn’t have the money to do anything about it, so they’re relying on developers.” He went on to add, “Factor in the massive residential developments that are coming downtown and we are severely affected.”
He expressed a high level of frustration over the City’s consultation process, telling me it’s quite simply insufficient. “They need better communications people, because we have a manager at city hall who is responsible for downtown business development, and nobody seems to know who she is or what she does.”
That’s unfortunate, because the effects of an ever-shrinking supply of parking are being felt directly by those who are trying to make a living in the city’s core, and they need proper representation at the staff level.
Supporting a blanket conversion of Lot 4 into other uses may be a recipe for advanced economic decline, if one also takes into account the proposal from the Provincial government for dedicated rapid bus lanes that will consume no less than 125 parking spaces when complete. If that wasn’t bad enough, consider the effect the widening of sidewalks along the north side of King Street has had on the number of spaces available, and the losses continue to mount.
This is where the difference in vision between the two Ward 4 councillors may be considered. I was advised by one downtown merchant of a recent survey undertaken by councillor Kerr in an apparent effort to gauge just how troubling the whole parking issue has become. “Rick Kerr is all over this parking thing, and it’s like he’s on a mission” she told me as we discussed her most pressing concerns. Numerous factors have come together in recent years, causing a negative effect on her business. They include open drug use among the homeless, an increase in crime, and of course the slow but steady erosion of accessible parking for customers she says are uncomfortable walking any great distance, particularly as the daylight hours diminish at this time of year.
I reached out to councillor Kerr for comment, and he suggested that “Our downtown businesses are stifled now by a lack of parking, for both customers and employees, and I can give you at least three examples. The first is the CIBC building, which has lots of available opportunities for future tenants, however they require reliable, available parking in order to successfully market their office space. Another example is the number of empty store-fronts where businesses have closed or relocated to other areas they see as more accessible. The third component is the lack of development potential for small-footprint buildings that cannot be converted or redeveloped due to their lack of anticipated parking requirements.”
While I did not reach out directly to councillor Giberson, his public comments on the issue of mobility within cities, and downtowns in general, has been outwardly focused on the promotion of alternate forms of transportation. In one of his social media posts he offers the following, “It's great to see what Ottawa has been doing in substantially increasing their bike lanes, and they are proof that with time (decade+) and focused will (political, planning & engineering depts, community organizing, financial commitment), you can build up that network and make active transportation and public transportation…a viable alternative to car-centric mobility…”
For many elected officials and urban planners, it has become fashionable to cast retailers and others who decry the absence of parking as being somehow biased in their perceptions and without proper appreciation for aspects such as bike lanes, which have certainly been in the news recently.
Meanwhile, in the shops and offices downtown, those at ground zero can see for themselves exactly what the absence of a meaningful strategic parking initiative has cost them, and they’re tired of excuses from a bureaucratic and political establishment that lacks the necessary vision.
Canada –an independent nation
Canada –an independent nation
by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC,
FEC, CET, P. Eng.
Former Member of Parliament
Pickering-Scarborough East
With the world in turmoil, Canada embroiled in political fights between the two parties which have traditionally ruled it, and our southern neighbor considering the imposition of a 25% tax on products from Canada under the new Trump administration, it is time to remember a little of our history and learn from our past leaders.
Largely unknown and unrecognised by the vast majority of Canadians, the Statute of Westminster Day, celebrated on December 11th is nonetheless an extremelyimportant day in Canada’s history as a nation.
The self-governing colonies of the British Empire, which included Canada, were known as the Dominions.
Despite their right for self-government, the British parliament had considerable legislative authority over the Dominions.
The situation was changed by the Statute of Westminster in 1931, which increased the sovereignty of the Dominions, giving them legal autonomy and making them essentially sovereign nations in their own right.
However, at Canada’s request, the British parliament retained the power to amend the constitution of Canada for five more decades after the enactment of the Statute.
The anniversary of the Statute of Westminster is celebrated in Canada every year, but it is not a public holiday, which means that government offices, educational establishments, banks, and businesses remain open unless December 11 falls on a weekend.
To celebrate the day, the national flag of Canada and the Royal Union Flag, commonly referred to as the Union Jack, are flown side by side on federal buildings and establishments from sunrise to sunset. Please observe that this is the case in your community.
In remembering the steps involved in the formation of the Canada of today, July 1, 1867, the day the Confederation of Canada came into being is generally considered the founding date of the country. However, at that rime the country still wasn’t an entirely “autonomous” nation.
That came decades later, on December 11, 1931 with the passing of the Statute of Westminster.
The British law clarified that Canada and other Commonwealth countries have full legal freedom except in areas where those nations chose to remain subordinate to Britain.
That Statute included the Dominion of Canada, the colony of Newfoundland (which would join Canada in 1949), the Commonwealth of Australia, the Dominion of New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State.
Having garnered great respect internationally and a strong sense of Canada’s unique nationality as a result of the First World War, Canada signed the Treaty of Versailles ending that war as a separate nation from Britain, though this was not quite the case.
During the following years, the government of Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie-King sought the full rights of a sovereign country in creation of laws and foreign policy.
The process had begun in the 1920’s when Canada signed a fishing treaty with the U.S without British participation, established an embassy in Washington, and decided not to assist a British occupation force in Turkey without the approval of Canada’s Parliament.
However, the seeds for autonomy were sown in 1926 at the Imperial Conference when Britain’s foreign minister, Lord Balfour proposed that the Dominions be granted legislative autonomy.
In 1929, Canada’s head of the Department of External Affairs, O.D. Skelton, attended the Conference on the Operation of Dominion Legislation in London. Here the various resolutions proposed in 1926 were firmed up.
In 1930 the various governments submitted terms of the future Statute to their Parliaments. Then on the date of December 11, 1931, the Statute was passed into law.
While the Dominions accepted all resolutions, only Canada couldn’t determine a process to amend the Constitution.
Thus, power to amend Canada’s Constitution remained under British authority until 1982 with the passing of Canada’s Constitution Act.
In conclusion, the anniversary of the Statute of Westminster is a key date that celebrates Canada’s legal independence from Britain.
This day is important because it marks Canada’s legislative autonomy, allowing it to make its own laws without British approval.
The Statute of Westminster was a pivotal step in Canada’s journey towards becoming a fully sovereign nation.
Celebrations on this day highlight Canada’s identity and achievements.
The statute is celebrated because it acknowledges the hard work and determination of Canadian leaders who fought for the country’s independence.
It also serves as a reminder of Canada’s evolution into a nation that stands on its own while still being part of the Commonwealth.
Our current leaders need to remember the work of their forefathers who guided Canada’s evolution to becoming an independent nation, They need to learn from our history, and possibly be inspired by the achievements of their predecessors.
Instead of bickering in their ivory towers in Ottawa, our leaders should concentrate on developing new and inspiring objectives for Canada as a nation, working to evolve Canada into a leading nation of the world.
What do you think?
Resume Trickery Never Works
Resume Trickery
Never Works
By Nick Kossovan
There was a time when "white fonting," using white text to hide keywords in your resume, was suggested to circumvent an employer's ATS. Many still use this resume trickery, which is considered unethical by many, even though ATS systems can detect white-font text and disregard it, and recruiters can check for.
The latest resume trickery self-professed career coaches are advising job seekers who feel their age is an obstacle to leaving dates off their resume. It's worth noting that it's in a career coach's best interest to have you believe ageism is widespread since this narrative helps them sell their "services."
Does ageism exist? Of course, it does, irrespective of age, along with countless other biases, albeit not to the extent promoted by career coaches and the media, whose self-interest is best served by keeping us anxious and addicted to the news.
Career coach's business model: Create a false narrative about a supposed job seeker's "obstacle" and offer a solution.
Leaving dates off your resume or LinkedIn profile is lying by omission—intentionally leaving out critical information to create a misleading impression—constitutes an unethical attempt to influence the reader by misrepresenting yourself. Furthermore, since dates of employment and graduation are standard on a resume, omitting dates raises a glaring red flag that you're hiding something. Hiring managers and recruiters read the same job search advice you do. When they read a resume without dates, they know why the candidate hasn't included them.
Putting aside the ethical question, assuming leaving off dates does get you an interview, once face-to-face, your age will be apparent; what then? If the hiring manager is an ageist, once seated, your age takes centre stage. They'll look for ways to confirm any biases they have of the age group and generation you belong to, such as:
· you won't be a cultural fit
· you'll soon retire
· you have age-related health issues
· you'll be entitled and easily offended and, therefore, hard to manage (especially younger candidates)
· you'll be more likely to engage in activism
· lack of experience
· too much experience (overqualified, will be expensive)
The range of assumptions, the foundation on which biases are formed, covers all ages, genders, races, ethnicities, etc. Hiring is a human judgement activity—maybe AI will change this one day—therefore, biases are inherent in the hiring process. You have biases; I have biases. Social norms and legislation cover up but don't eradicate biases, turning them into "subtle undertones."
Presuming skills, competencies, and experience are relatively equal, which candidate would you lean toward:
Candidate A: As you're engaging in small talk, which they initiated, they mentioned they're Seattle Kraken fans; you also happen to be a fan.
Candidate B: Doesn't initiate small talk, and when you ask if they watched last night's Seattle Kraken vs. New York Islanders game, they say they don't like sports.
Candidate A: Attended MacEwan University (Class of 2002), as did you (Class of 1997).
Candidate B: Attended Boatwright University (Class of 1993).
Generally, our biases aren't malicious. I'm of the opinion that, for the most part, "bias" is merely choosing whether an employee, friend, spouse, mechanic, doctor, or financial advisor is someone you feel comfortable with, and commonalities go a long way in making this decision. Your interviewer, especially if they're the person you'll be reporting to, is asking themselves:
· Can I work with this person?
· Will the team accept this person?
Another reason lying by omission is futile is the Internet, which experts conveniently fail to mention. The Internet has made hiding your age and other details about yourself a futile endeavour. It's a given that your LinkedIn profile will be read, and you'll be Googled to determine if you're interview-worthy. If a hiring manager wants to know your age or anything else about you, they can use Google and find:
· the years you graduated
· the years you played minor league hockey
· the picture your daughter, who tagged you, posted on Facebook in August 2004 of you dropping her off at university
· the whitepaper, Advancing European Markets Are Undermining Globalization, you wrote back in 1998 for the brokerage firm you were working at
· your tweet announcing your 25th wedding anniversary
The point I'm making is it's better to be transparent about your age or [whatever]. At some point in the hiring process, especially since employers usually conduct four to six interviews, the employer will find out what you're trying to hide. Therefore, if the hiring manager is an ageist, you'll be eliminated when they Google you and determine your age, and off-chance should you get an interview, it'll be awkward. It's better to beeliminated upfront than to spend time preparing for and conducting an interview only to be rejected because of an "ism."
I believe ageism or any other "ism" can be overcome by self-empowerment (read: respecting yourself) that comes from being proud of who you are and all you've accomplished rather than contorting yourself trying to be accepted. Look for an employer who values the experience of a 'seasoned' candidate—they do exist. Self-respect begets respect. I don't know a hiring manager who hires candidates they don't respect.
_____________________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham
NAVIGATING THE NARRATIVE WAR
NAVIGATING
THE NARRATIVE WAR
By Carla Grace Skinner
The Information Age, also called the Digital Age or the New Media Age, can be difficult to navigate. Establishment Media is quickly becoming irrelevant. The simplicity of turning on our television and tuning into the news to stay informed is a thing of the past. Ratings are in decline due to lack of public trust and as a result, competing platforms have emerged. How we source information has evolved and the demand for journalistic integrity has increased. With so many information sources including mainstream media (“MSN”), government funded media, digital media, print media, social media etc., how do we know who to trust and how do we know what is factually true?
Prior to the pandemic, I paid very little attention to news or politics. Tuning into cable news to stay up to date on the spread of the virus was a real eye opener for me. Because I had no preformed biases or political affiliations, I was consuming the news from all MSN Outlets, without prejudice. I realized very quickly that there were two completely different narratives being reported to the public. I began to see highly credentialed experts being censored; that some narratives were 100% fabricated as well as MSN warnings of misinformation, disinformation and warnings to stay away from social media. It was clear to me that this was a tactic used to attempt to control the narrative. I began to see citizen journalists being silenced for reporting evidence-based information; breaking stories with zero mainstream coverage; fellow citizens labeled and shamed for having a differing opinion; a divide forming within the collective psyche. As a result, I became fully committed to learning how to navigate this evolving media landscape in the search for accurate information. I committed to listening to content creators from both mainstream and independent media sources focusing on which side gave the most supporting evidence. Despite whether I agreed and aligned with every belief of the content creator, I concerned myself only with the quality of information being provided and their knowledge of the topic.
Navigating the Narrative requires us to understand all sides and to carefully analyze the facts and supporting evidence, whether the sources are mainstream or independent. Seeking out the stories that MSN fails to report on can provide a wealth of information. Listen to what several experts have to say about an issue, especially those being censored and shadow banned. Social Media is home to many quality content creators and should therefore be judged based on their content rather than the platform they use to deliver their message. Always do your own fact checking and seek understanding vs confirming whatever supports your current beliefs. We believe what we believe based on what we’re told. Remember, history is written by the victors, therefore, questioning your sources makes good common sense!
Labels:
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham
How Crime Affect Home Values Theresa Grant
How Crime Affect Home Values Theresa Grant
By Theresa Grant - Real Estate Columnist
We all want to live in a beautiful neighbourhood where the streets are lined with mature trees, the neighbours all know each other, and the sounds of children playing echo through the air.
Often, through the years, I have heard people say that when they grew up, they never had to lock their doors.
In fact, I remember myself, growing up in Toronto. We lived on a side street in the Yonge and Eglinton area. It was a very nice area. Very quiet at the time. There were two schools in the area so you either went to the Catholic school or the Public school. Although the kids attended the different schools, there were all neighbours and so we played together every day and on weekends. Our summers were spent together, exploring our neighbourhood. For the most part, the parents knew each other, at least to say hello. I know that our front door was rarely locked. That was the 70’s mind you. Things have changed quite a bit since then.
I remember driving with my family to visit my Aunt and Uncle who lived in Oshawa. The lived-on St. Lawrence St. around Mill and Simcoe. There was a Kentucky Fried Chicken on the corner of Mill and Simcoe, and as soon as we would pull off of the 401, we could see the giant bucket turning atop its pole.
It was so exciting for us kids. We always had Kentucky Fried Chicken for dinner when we visited our Oshawa relatives. Many times I would here one of my cousins announce that they were heading uptown. I always wondered why they called it uptown, In Toronto, we would always say downtown. All of the neighbours on St. Lawrence knew each other and they knew us as well. Very friendly people, they were. We never heard any talk of crime or violence to any degree. We played freely without a care in the world.
Today things are very different, and our society has changed so drastically. Once lovely neighbourhoods have fallen into disrepair. Drugs, violence, and homelessness have taken root in some of the oldest and most well-established areas of our city. While local Council scrambles to keep up with the growing issues that plague our city, homeowners have to do what they can to protect themselves and their property. As well as protecting their property, their property values are actually affected by crime rates. If you live in a high crime area, the value of your home will be less than the same home in a low crime area of the city. People want to feel safe, especially at home. Some areas of the city tend to see more crime than others. Unfortunately, an area that has experienced a high crime rate will often be painted with a stigma long after things have started to get better in the neighbourhood. Whether purchasing or renting, it’s always a good idea to thoroughly research the area that you are planning to move into and call home.
Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com
Labels:
#Central,
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham
I'll Be Home For Christmas
I'll Be Home For
Christmas
from Wayne & Tamara
I have been married 25 years. We come from completely different backgrounds. I grew up in a large family in a small town, and we were poor. My husband is an only child, privileged, and he was given everything by his parents. This continued throughout all our married life.
The house we moved into, against my wishes, is theirs. It was "given" to us when they retired and built a home in a warmer climate. However, the deed remained in his parents' name, and they came back every summer for a visit. For me it was a nightmare.
I work full-time but arranged time off to get everything in immaculate order for Abigail, my mother-in-law. It was never good enough. It was always a white glove inspection with her rubbing her hands across my kitchen counter and glancing at her fingertips. She even poked her head up inside the fireplace.
She would say, "Oh, honey, you need to clean your mirrors," or "I rewaxed your floors because I didn't think they were clean enough." When she asked how I liked my house, I would say I didn't really think it was mine. She would smile at me and say, "No, it's not, is it?"
One year after they arrived and we were having dinner, I made a grammatical error. I said "me and Linda" instead of "Linda and I." Abigail rapped her spoon on the tabletop screeching, "Honey, Honey, Honey! It is not me and Linda! It is Linda and I! Linda and I! Linda and I!" I was so stunned and embarrassed I excused myself from the table.
My husband and my father-in-law just dropped their heads. As usual, what Abigail did was "for my own good." The following year she brought me a grammar book.
I adored my father-in-law. He made me feel special. He would put his arms around me and tell me how much he appreciated me putting up with them. My husband would say, "That's just my mom." So I quit trying to fight her for the sake of my father-in-law and husband and to keep the peace.
Three years ago when my father-in-law died, something happened inside me. I felt so much anger at Abigail I wanted to stay away from her. Last Christmas I didn't want to go see her. Abigail went berserk saying, "How will this look to my friends?" So I went.
Within 24 hours she started in on me, as always, after my husband left the room. This time I called my husband back. It shocked my husband to see his sweet mom screaming, but when she saw she wasn't going to get away with it, she switched like a light bulb. She hugged me and told me how much she loved me. The rest of our visit she was as nice as pie.
It is Christmas again, and we are scheduled to return to her house. I've asked my husband to go alone, which he thinks is a horrible idea. I am on antidepressants and scheduled for therapy after the first of the year. Am I being selfish?
Melanie
Melanie, the Greek playwright Aristophanes said, "The wise learn many things from their foes." Last Christmas you learned two things from Abigail. You learned she would be embarrassed if you refuse to visit, and you learned she will not confront you in front of her son.
If you can stay home without doing serious damage to your marriage, that is one possible course of action. But there is another answer. Can you distance yourself from the situation? Can you decide in a perfectly calm, cool manner that you will go, but if your mother-in-law is not nice as pie, you will confront her in front of her son?
Abigail has shown you that you can alter her behavior by standing up to her. The power has shifted.
Wayne & Tamara
SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com
Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s
Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.
Are Retirement Residences a Good Move?
By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford
Yes, at 100 years of age I’ve written another book! After ten other books sharing health advice with readers, why add another one? Because I’m now living in a retirement residence and I have new perspective on the many health hazards that seniors encounter when relocating into these homes, but which rarely get mentioned. And I’ve got views on how to avoid them.
My book is titled Healthy Retirement Residence Living: What Does Gifford-Jones Say? In it, I describe the security these homes offer and the many facilities that can be enjoyed. But there is also an old saying, that when porcupines make love, they do so very, very carefully! I’ll use the same caution to prepare you for the possible pitfalls of retirement residence living.
Choosing the right location is among the most important considerations. Managers of classy outfits sometimes offer a free meal to attract prospective residents. Accept it, and take a good look, especially at the bathrooms! Look for grab bars in showers and around the toilet. How much care has been taken to reduce the likelihood of falls? Remember, for the thousands of dollars a month charged for the accommodation, little things that protect your safety should not be a matter for negotiation.
Several chapters show why the bathroom is the most dangerous place. In a split second it’s so easy to slip and fall. This can result in a minor bruise or multiple bone fractures requiring weeks of recovery. It’s a terrible start if this happens when you’ve just moved into a retirement residence.
The book acknowledges a major problem of aging. It is the loss of muscle and bone strength. The change is gradual, and many may not be aware of deteriorating abilities. That is, until they cannot get off the toilet. A cry for help is deeply embarrassing when it happens. You may believe a gym instructor is needed. But there’s a way to prevent this annoying problem that you can easily do on your own.
The book also contains a bit of history. For instance, why a common human malady may have been responsible for Napoleon Bonaparte losing the Battle of Waterloo!
Most people have never heard of “fecal impaction”. It is due to poor dietary habits. Hard fecal material lodges in the large intestines making a bowel movement impossible. This usually means emergency care, and nobody ever forgets this digestive complication. Yet it’s easy to prevent.
At my age, I can sleep nine hours at night without a bathroom break. I’m convinced it’s due to the high doses of vitamin C I take daily. The book outlines the benefit of this safe natural remedy. For instance, how it always solves constipation and how good it is for cardiovascular health and the immune system.
The book also shows how you can be overweight but still healthy. Many residents of retirement homes develop health problems due to lack of exercise and over abundance of food. This does not need to happen. Never forget, “the fault is not in our stars, but in ourselves.”
This is my final book and there’s a touch of sadness. I hope it will be well received by children and parents who are facing the move into a retirement home. May it make everyone’s lives healthier and longer at any age.
It’s been the great pleasure of my life to be both a surgeon and medical journalist. Being a book author is harder because getting the word out depends on other people. For this reason, I hope you will mention my new book to your family and friends.
Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments,
contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones
Sunday, November 24, 2024
Canada’s ever challenged parliamentary democracy
by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC,
FEC, CET, P. Eng.
Former Member of Parliament
Pickering-Scarborough East
It is becoming increasingly clear that the political system in Canada has degenerated in a worrisome way. More and more power is concentrated in the Prime Minister Office and the Office of the Loyal Opposition, where the staff set the rules, blessed by their respective leaders. I would say without remorse that this is an affront to the spirit of democracy, and borders on being a parallel structure.
The role of the elected Members of Parliament is drastically reduced and their freedom of speech in expressing their opinions is limited to the point of being muzzled, all in the name of maintaining party discipline.
This does not serve the nation, which is then led by the staff of the elected people for all intents and purposes. It is very sad indeed, that we have arrived at this stage. Staff of the members are literarily spying on them and reporting any moves to the staff in the leader’s office, which in turn can reward them or punish them.
Moreover, the quality of the staff and their life experience is questionable and we have often seen -former staff running for elected office. It seems to me that we are reenacting the medieval dark ages, when the inner intrigues for gaining power were the basis for decisions and rules, not the interest of the people.
The United States, at least at the presidential level, seems to be changing this trend. The re-elected President does not come from the political establishment, but has a lifetime of business experience to draw on. We will see how this works out, but it is certainly a novelty.
Perhaps it is time for us in Canada to have a leader with a broader view and experience, one who is not limited to a political science or law background, without any real life experience. Certainly, this new type of leader might have some interesting and out of the box ideas on how to rule in the people’s interest.
Returning to how things are run in Canada today; party staffers monitor caucus for signs of message indiscipline and fraternization with other MPs. MPs say, and I can confirm from my own experience in the House of Commons, that there is less and less freedom of action with an increasingly tight control from the leader’s office.
MPs are watched by party staffers both inside and outside Parliament. Elected representatives are publicly called to order for deviating from the so-called party line. Words and actions are closely scrutinized by the leader's office. Partisanship is encouraged. Fraternizing with elected officials from other parties is a no-no.
Those who follow blindly without deviating from the sometimes very narrow party lines are rewarded. Those who don't follow blindly and might have some good ideas which might benefit the party, often have to suffer consequences.
There are always multiple people in the penalty box; there is always someone in trouble for having a slightly better idea than the party line, but not understood by the controlling staff who reports them to the leader.
Some elected officials feel they come to caucus to be told what to do and what to think. Unfortunately, this is very true. The caucus meeting is not a constructive way to listen to members’ ideas. One minute for making your point is not enough, mostly when the leader is not listening while you speak. Often, his mind is already made up, and you find yourself conducting a one-way conversation.
If the leader invents a new slogan, it is understood that the respective MPs will have to use it. Catchphrases deployed by leaders (axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget, stop the crime) and terms of derision like "wacko," "radical," are often picked up and repeated by MPs. The Question Period becomes a circus with questions going unanswered, as empty wording is tossed about. It is sad to watch.
MPs who repeat the slogans are usually rewarded and celebrated in front of the entire caucus for being a good cheerleader. Such MPs get more speaking time in the House and during question period. Those MPs who refuse to parrot the lines lose their speaking time, in direct proportion to their ‘offense’.
Lately it has been reported that a press secretary for the leader of the Conservative opposition has been seen on multiple occasions, signalling MPs not to stop in front of the cameras. Like a policeman directing traffic, he seemed to be beckoning them to enter the room without responding to reporters. This is nothing new. It was thus when the Conservatives were in power; I experienced it personally.
More recently, it seems that press secretaries from the Conservative leader’s office have been supervising the entrances to Parliament and monitoring journalists' scrums with MPs, with the goal of recording the exchanges. The Conservative Party seems to be the only federal party that currently does this, so old habits are not dying. This is not surprising, considering that the majority of the current senior staff come from the Harper era and seem frozen in time, without any new ideas.
Therefore, we have arrived in a situation where everybody is being watched. What the MPs say, what they do, who they talk to. The MPs are told not to fraternize with MPs from the other parties. This isolationist attitude is far from normal and it certainly does not help to resolve the country’s problems.
In my humble opinion, to be a good MP, it is important to build relationships with colleagues from other parties. That is how Parliament is supposed to work best for Canadians. The leader's office is against this because it wants to control everything.
Staffers, especially Conservative staffers, have developed and perfected a culture of monitoring MPs' interactions not only in the Commons chamber but also in the corridors of Parliament and at social events.
As this evidence shows, political employees who were not elected by the people act as if they were. This is a deplorable situation, and if I were a Member of Parliament again, I'd go to the leader to denounce the situation and say I'm not going to stand for this.
In conclusion, party discipline is needed, but Orwellian exaggerations have no place in it.
The question remains: when will the political establishment abandon theatrics and start to work for the people who elected them?
What are your thoughts?
Which Candidate Would You Hire? A or B
Which Candidate Would You
Hire? A or B?
By Nick Kossovan
Speaking from personal experience, a bad hire isn't a good look. The last thing you want is to hear, "Who the hell hired Bob?" and have your hiring judgment questioned.
The job seeker who's empathetic to the employer's side of the hiring desk, which controls the hiring process, is rare.
One of the best things you can do to enhance your job search is to practice perspective-taking, which involves seeing things from a different perspective.
It's natural for employers to find candidates who have empathy and an understanding of their challenges and pain points more attractive. Candidates like these are seen as potential allies rather than individuals only looking out for themselves. Since most job seekers approach employers with a 'what's in it for me' mindset, practicing perspective-taking sets you apart.
"If there is any one secret of success, it lies in the ability to get the other person's point of view and see things from that person's angle as well as from your own." - Henry Ford.
Perspective-taking makes you realize that from an employer's POV hiring is fraught with risks employers want to avoid; thus, you consider what most job seekers don't: How can I present myself as the least risky hiring option?
Here's an exercise that'll help you visualize the employer's side of the hiring process.
Candidate A or B?
Imagine you're the Director of Customer Service for a regional bank with 85 branches. You're hiring a call centre manager who'll work onsite at the bank's head office, overseeing the bank's 50-seat call centre. In addition to working with the call centre agents, the successful candidate will also interact with other departments, your boss, and members of the C-suite leadership team; in other words, they'll be visible throughout the bank.
The job posting resulted in over 400 applications. The bank's ATS and HR (phone interview vetting, skill assessment testing) selected five candidates, plus an employee referral, for you to interview. You aim to shortlist the six candidates to three, whom you'll interview a second time, and then make a hiring decision. Before scheduling the interviews, which'll take place between all your other ongoing responsibilities, you spend 5 - 10 minutes with each candidate's resume and review their respective digital footprint and LinkedIn activity.
In your opinion, which candidate deserves a second interview?
Candidate A: Their resume provides quantitative numbers—evidence—of the results they've achieved. (Through enhanced agent training, reduced average handle time from 4:32 mins. to 2:43 minutes, which decreased the abandon rate from 4.6% to 2.2%.)
Candidate B: Their resume offers only opinions. ("I'm detail-oriented," "I learn fast.")
Candidate A: Looks you in the eye, has a firm handshake, smiles, and exudes confidence.
Candidate B: Doesn’t look you in the eye, has a weak handshake.
Candidate A: Referred by Ariya, who's been with the bank for over 15 years and has a stellar record, having moved up from teller to credit analyst and is tracking to become a Managing Director.
Candidate B: Applied online. Based on your knowledge, they did nothing else to make their application more visible. (e.g., reached out to you or other bank employees)
Candidate A: Well educated, grew up as a digital native, eager and energetic. Currently manages a 35-seat call center for a mid-size credit union. They mention they called the bank's call centre several times and suggest ways to improve the caller experience.
Candidate B: Has been working in banking for over 25 years, managing the call center at their last bank for 17 years before being laid off eight months ago. They definitely have the experience to run a call centre. However, you have a nagging gut feeling that they're just looking for a place to park themselves until they can afford to retire.
Candidate A: Has a fully completed LinkedIn profile (picture, eye-catching banner) packed with quantifying numbers. It's evident how they were of value to their employers. Recently, they engaged constructively with posts and comments and published a LinkedIn article on managing Generations Y and Z call centre agents. Their Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter/X accounts aren't controversial, sharing between 'Happy Birthday' and 'Congratulations' messages, their love of fine dining, baseball, and gardening.
Candidate B: Their LinkedIn profile is incomplete. The last time they posted on LinkedIn was seven months ago, ranting about how the government's latest interest rate hike will plunge the country into a deep recession. Conspiracy theories abound on their Facebook page.
Candidate A: Notices the golf calendar on your desk, the putter and golf balls in the corner, and a photograph of Phil Mickelson putting on the green jacket at the 2010 Masters hanging on your wall. While nodding towards the picture, they say, "Evidently, you golf. Not being a golfer myself, what made you take up golf, which I understand is a frustrating sport?"
Candidate B: Doesn't proactively engage in small talk. Waits for you to start the interview.
Which of the above candidates presents the least hiring risk? Will likely succeed (read: achieve the results the employer needs)? Will show your boss, upper management, and employees you know how to hire for competence and fit?
_____________________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com
Trudeau finally cracked
By Joe Ingino
B.A. Psychology
Editor/Publisher Central Newspapers
ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000
Published Columns in Canada and The United States
What is wrong with our Prime Minister? He has managed to declare and undeclared war on Nations that are pointing and laughing at Trudeau’s leadership.
First he went after the Chinese.... He blamed them for espionage and Canada infrastructure tampering. Then he turns around and allows the Chinese army to practically invade a Province in Canada in the name of ‘joint military’ exercises. The Chinese must be laughing at us as most of the world.
Not to long after that, he declared a silent war on India. India according to Trudeau has been involved in all kinds of criminal activities. Including the tampering of the democratic process.
Has he gone mad. On either, case if a war was called.... we are already invaded by either Nations people through his immigration policies. Are we to turn to Trump to come in and liberate us?
Just recently the wire news communique read - ‘Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says Canada will abide by all rulings of the International Criminal Court, after the war crimes tribunal in The Hague issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his former defense minister and a Hamas military chief.’
Really. This poor excuse for a Prime Minister is going to side with a people that took innocent civilians as hostages and ran down city street shooting at anyone in sight.
Where is his call for the arrest of all the leaders of Hamas? How is it that he is not outlawing any pro Palestine demonstrations as an act of terrorism against the people of the world.
The Palestinian people demand. On grounds that are beyond shaky. Palestinians where not attacked upon. They are not being held hostage almost a year after the conflict they started.
Now Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is exercising his right to retrieve hostages at all cost and he is the criminal.
Think about it for a moment. All people of Israel are his responsibility. If you had your children, mother, father or any family member taken beaten, tortured for no reason other than your ethnicity. Would you not use every tool available to go after those responsible? The Palestinians want the war to end. Release the hostages and apologize for killing innocent un-expected civilians.
The Americans back the Israeli. As Canada did for while. Are we to assume that Justin call for the arrest of a foreign leader is a call to war? Are we going to battle with Israel. The U.S. any supporters of the same? Pure, insanity. It’s their war. Let them fight it out. Sure the death of innocent lives on both side is horrific... but it should lie on the shoulders of Hamas. No reason for savagery. No reason to attack innocent citizen. I think that Justin is wrong in getting Canada involved in foreign conflict. Hope Trump soon comes to the rescue of Canadians.
Labels:
#Durham,
#ingino,
#Job,
#joeingino,
Blacklivesmatter,
Canada,
Central,
Chisu,
COVID,
downtown,
Duher,
Durham
INDUSTRY vs RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - HOW CITY HALL DROPPED THE BALL -
By Dean Hickey
ONE OF THE TOP PRIORITIES of elected officials and city hall staff is to safeguard
whatever remains of Oshawa’s once-prolific industrial base.
Along the south side of Wolfe Street, opposite the old Cedardale School property, stands one such survivor of the de-industrialization of North America, that being AGS Automotive Systems, a company that engages in heavy metal stamping and chrome plating of automotive parts, all within a 350,000 sq. ft. complex that has been at its current location for more than 60 years
Locals will remember it as the Houdaille Bumper plant where workers staged a thirteen-day takeover of the building in August 1979 until they won a better severance package due to its impending closure. It was a labour struggle that generated front page news and introduced reforms extending worker rights to include advance notice of workplace closures.
Well, fast forward to 2024 when yet another threat to local jobs has emerged, this time in the form of a proposed condominium complex to be located on land that is literally a stone’s throw from the AGS office main entrance.
At their most recent meeting, members of the Economic and Development Services committee heard a presentation on behalf of a developer who wants to literally transform the vacant lot into a veritable metropolis of high density housing where no less than 67 household will reside.
One delegation who came forward from the public gallery to address the committee was Lisa Boulton, general counsel for AGS Automotive. Her comments couldn’t have failed to make both the developer and city hall staff look any worse.
The property in question is the playing field for the now-closed Cedardale Public School, which is mostly surrounded by a low density residential area dominated by century-old homes. What has been proposed is the construction of stacked townhouses up to four floors in height, including roof-top terraces that would have a direct line of sight over the top of the stamping plant right across the street.
In her delegation, Ms Boulton was quick to remind councillors that AGS operates under an Environmental Certificate of Approval issued by the Provincial government, and a better-than-average chance exists that some of the new residents would seek to challenge the effects of noise and emissions from their facility.
She indicated AGS itself has not been given an appropriate opportunity to fully understand the adverse impacts their operations might cause. “I just need the committee to understand that 67 units means there’s an opportunity for 67 complaints” she said.
Ms Boulton would offer up a few sobering remarks as to AGS having been “brought into the loop late in the game,” suggesting they were not invited to the community consultation which took place in 2023. She further stated that recent attempts by AGS to reach out to the developer generated no response.
A neighbourhood public meeting was held late last year in an effort to obtain comments from the public. In a report to members of the committee, staff indicate they attended the meeting and also provided the developer with mailing labels for notices to be sent to affected residents and property owners. Yet, as Ms Boulton pointed out, AGS was not aware of the proposal until notifications for the recent meeting at city hall were distributed in October of this year. “We found out about this proposed development as a result of the public notification process from the City of Oshawa” she said.
Herein lies the shortcomings on the part of a city hall department and its leadership team who quite simply dropped the ball in a classic case of bureaucratic indifference.
As this columnist sees it, both the Director and the Commissioner of Economic and Development Services bear the responsibility to take a pro-active approach in a scenario where a major employer may be seriously compromised by a proposed change in use, such as the Cedardale School property.
The commissioner’s own report outlines the need to consider the adverse effects of noise and pollution that may emanate from certain industrial land uses. Contained within a list of twelve considerations for review by staff is ‘noise attenuation’ and ‘land use compatibility with the adjacent industrial facility.’
For the benefit of the commissioner, I have drawn up a paragraph that should have been included in his report, and it reads as follows:
“In advance of the public information centre held on September 28, 2023, the subject application was provided to the Economic Development team for comment. In accordance with policies aimed at protecting the viability of heavy industries while identifying adverse effects any new developments may have on their existing operations, representatives of AGS Automotive Systems were invited by staff to attend the information session and to submit any comments or concerns they felt were in need of consideration as this proposal moves forward.”
A well-intentioned and direct statement that did not appear in the report, a pro-active stance on the part of city hall that did not take place, and a concern for the preservation of good paying jobs that apparently has yet to be properly communicated.
Experience keeps a dear school, yet some will learn in no other; staff at city hall being no exception. Perhaps the warning given by Ms Boulton will not fall on deaf ears, as she told members of the committee, “We fear losing Canadian footprint in the automotive industry and… a development like this in such close proximity to heavy industry will have a very adverse impact on the community. I will also add that, in the city of Scarborough, AG Simpson had a plant for many years, and we… closed that plant because it was just too difficult to work with residences in close proximity to a heavy manufacturing facility.”
With 250 jobs hanging in the balance, someone at city hall should have long-since picked up the telephone and taken seriously the need to start mitigating what may very quickly amount to the loss of more local industry. Mayor Dan Carter suggested to the delegation that “…this is education for all of us, because I think we’re going to come across other situations environmentally sensitive like this.”
It is past time to be proactive in the defence of workers and their families, and that means looking beyond what has become the dull routine of a bureaucratic planning process.
Unjust Arrests: How Medical Conditions Are Mistaken for Drug Use, Leaving Vulnerable People at Risk
Unjust Arrests:
How Medical Conditions Are Mistaken for Drug Use, Leaving Vulnerable People at Risk
By Dale Jodoin
Across North America, there is an unsettling trend that’s putting innocent people in harm’s way. Imagine experiencing a medical emergency — maybe it’s a sudden diabetic episode or a panic attack — only to be mistaken for a drug user, handcuffed, and thrown in jail instead of receiving the medical help you need. This is the reality for many individuals with serious medical conditions that, unfortunately, can mimic the signs of drug use. These people, already vulnerable, are now facing stigma, legal troubles, and even life-threatening consequences because of a system that lacks understanding and compassion.
Medical Conditions That Look Like Drug Use
Certain health conditions cause symptoms that can appear similar to intoxication or drug use. Here are some examples:
Diabetes (Hypoglycemia): When blood sugar levels drop too low, a person can become confused, dizzy, and unsteady on their feet, much like someone who is drunk or high. They might slur their speech, sweat profusely, or even pass out. Despite this, people in this state have been mistaken for drug users and denied the immediate care they need.
Epilepsy: People with epilepsy sometimes experience seizures that can make them appear “out of it” or cause sudden behavioral changes. In public settings, they might be seen as “acting strange,” leading law enforcement to jump to conclusions.
Mental Health Conditions (e.g., Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia): Those suffering from severe mental health conditions can exhibit behavior that may be misinterpreted. They may talk quickly, become aggressive, or seem disoriented, and officers who lack training might assume they are on drugs.
Panic and Anxiety Disorders: Panic attacks can cause people to feel overwhelmed, dizzy, short of breath, and fearful. They might tremble or struggle to respond coherently, which some may mistake for drug use.
These examples are just a few of the many medical issues that can be misunderstood, resulting in life-altering consequences for those affected. When individuals in crisis are misjudged, they’re often handcuffed, put in holding cells, or dismissed as “just another drug user.” In reality, they’re people in desperate need of help — help that’s often delayed or denied because of this misinterpretation.
Arrested Instead of Treated
The consequences of these misunderstandings are severe. Instead of getting timely medical care, many individuals end up in custody. The physical and emotional toll of these situations is enormous. Imagine being taken to jail when you’re already in distress and unable to explain yourself. Not only does this deny people medical attention, but it also stigmatizes them, casting them as criminals simply because their medical crisis was misunderstood.
Furthermore, being labeled as a drug user can have lasting effects. It affects relationships, employment, and social standing, leaving people feeling isolated and shamed over something they had no control over.
Why This Keeps Happening
Law enforcement officers often have to make quick decisions in high-stress situations. However, without medical training, it’s easy to mistake the symptoms of a medical condition for the effects of drug use. Police departments are increasingly facing calls to provide more comprehensive training so that officers can better recognize the signs of medical issues.
Despite some progress, many officers still lack the resources or training to accurately distinguish between a medical emergency and drug impairment. As a result, people with legitimate medical needs are being wrongly accused and even put at risk of death when they don’t receive timely help.
Real-Life Stories of Misunderstood Illnesses
In one well-known case, a man suffering from a diabetic episode was driving when his blood sugar dropped. He started to act erratically, and when police arrived, they assumed he was under the influence of drugs. Instead of checking his medical condition, they arrested him. By the time his family could intervene, he was in critical condition due to delayed treatment.
Another case involved a woman experiencing a panic attack in a store. She became visibly distressed, breathing heavily and clutching her chest. The police were called, but instead of offering assistance, they assumed she was on drugs and detained her. This traumatic experience not only left her shaken but also reinforced the stigma that anyone exhibiting unusual behavior must be on drugs.
These stories are not isolated incidents. They happen far too often, highlighting a need for change in how we respond to people in distress.
Saturday, November 16, 2024
A Smooth Move
A Smooth Move
Theresa Grant - Real Estate Columnist
Moving to a new home can be very exciting, but it also ranks among the top five as one of the most stressful situations we deal with. There are a few things we can do to eliminate or decrease the stress level when moving.
One of the earliest things we can do is start planning as soon as you know you are moving. Make a moving checklist that includes all the tasks that will need to be completed, such as hiring movers, notifying utility companies (or anyone else that will need your new address), and then organize your packing. In order not to feel rushed or become overwhelmed, set a timeline for each task.
Moving can be a perfect time to declutter and donate things that you really don’t use anymore but are taking up space.
Hire movers if you can. Professional movers can make your move go much faster and relieve you of the stress of getting all of your belongings from point A to point B. Be sure to hire movers that are experienced and insured in case anything happens to any of your belongings. Movers can make all the difference in the world on moving day. You simply direct traffic, while they do all the heavy lifting.
Be sure to pack your belongings efficiently. This can be the most time-consuming part of moving but if done properly it will save you a lot of grief in the end. There is nothing worse than getting to your new place, having all your boxes everywhere and not knowing where anything is.
In my early days I moved a lot, and with two young children in tow it was not always the smoothest experience. In my opinion, hiring movers is a great investment.
Having a moving binder or digital file where you can keep all of your receipts, contracts, checklists, and utility information can help keep you on track.
Ask for help from family and friends if you can. Trying to do something as monumental as moving on your own can be overwhelming.
Keep in mind your mental and physical health through the process from start to finish. Be sure to take breaks, maybe go for a walk, or meditate.
Prepare for your first night in your new home. In an effort to minimize stress, put together a first night box. The box should include everything that you will need prior to getting fully unpacked. Toiletries, bedding, and snacks are important. It is suggested by professional moving companies that you make your first priority after arriving at the new place, to set up your beds and make them. That way, when you are exhausted and simply cannot do anymore, you can fall into a made bed and get a good night’s sleep before tackling the unpacking in the morning. Unless you plan to make a coffee run in the morning, it may be a good idea to pack a little box with cups, sugar, spoons and coffee, tea or whatever gets you going in the morning.
Questions? Column ideas? You can email me at newspaper@ocentral.com
Mayor Ashe’s Hypocrisy Exposed: Why He Doesn’t Deserve a “Mental Health Hero Award”
Mayor Ashe’s Hypocrisy Exposed:
Why He Doesn’t Deserve a
“Mental Health Hero Award”
By Lisa Robinson
It is deeply disheartening to see Mayor Kevin Ashe receive a Mental Health Hero Award when his actions and words have contributed to the very struggles this award seeks to address.
While the loss of his stepson Alex is a tragedy no family should endure, it is important to hold public figures accountable for their behaviour, especially when they claim to advocate for mental health.
This is a mayor who has repeatedly resorted to divisive rhetoric, labeling Pickering residents and others as “nut cases,” “Nazis,” “homophobes,” and “transphobic,” while dismissing legitimate concerns as “alt-right conspiracy theories.” This kind of language does not break the stigma around mental health; it perpetuates it. His actions — from belittling dissenting voices to encouraging intimidation and bullying — from those who follow him on social media are the exact behaviors that contribute to mental health struggles, including depression and even suicide.
Even his own family members jump in on social media calling those with opposing views to f#%k off or eat- sh#t, while the mayor tells people “go have another drink” pushing vulnerable people and their mental health to the limits.
Let us not forget his letter to the provincial government recently advocating for the use of the notwithstanding clause to displace homeless individuals — a clear disregard for the dignity and well-being of vulnerable residents. Or the fact that he has taken away six months’ worth of income from a fellow colleague, a single mother, leaving her struggling to provide to put food on the table for her family. and keep a roof over their head. These are not the actions of a mental health advocate but those of a mayor whose decisions and words actively harm others.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, while families were told to stay home, avoid travel, and follow strict health protocols — even as loved ones died alone in long-term care facilities — like our very own Orchard Villa - Mayor Ashe traveled on vacation with his family. This blatant hypocrisy, at a time when so many Pickering residents were struggling and making personal sacrifices, is not the behavior of someone deserving of such an honor.
Families were being torn apart by policies that discouraged mixing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, yet he violated those same principles he told others to uphold.
Additionally, Mayor Ashe has stifled free expression and public participation in Council by controlling what can be discussed, limiting access to videotaping, and silencing voices critical of his leadership. lobbying the Provincial Government to change the Municipal Act for the ability to remove an elected official- taking away the rights and voices of the people who elected them, and furthermore to forbid them to run in a subsequent election- that is election tampering. His frequent intimidation of council members and residents only reinforces the perception of a deeply toxic and undemocratic environment.
It is deeply concerning that such an award is being presented to someone whose behavior does not align with the values of compassion, understanding, and support that mental health advocacy embodies. The only reason this honor has been bestowed upon him appears to be tied to his connections and financial contributions from events like the Mayor’s Gala / Flag raising- or funding from the Corporation of the City of pickering, a troubling reflection of the very corruption Pickering residents are tired of seeing.
True mental health heroes build others up, create safe spaces for dialogue, and lead with humility and integrity. Shame on you Mr. Mayor Shame on you.
I have always stood as a true advocate for the homeless and for genuine mental health support. True advocacy means addressing the root causes of struggles, not silencing or dismissing those in need. Bullying, intimidation, and hypocrisy have no place in leadership, and true leadership is about integrity, not popularity or alliances.
“Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It”
Job Seekers' Trinity Focus, Anger and Evidence
By Nick Kossovan
Though I have no empirical evidence to support my claim, I believe job search success can be achieved faster by using what I call "The Job Seekers' Trinity" as your framework, the trinity being:
1. The power of focus
2. Managing your anger
3. Presenting evidence
Each component plays a critical role in sustaining motivation and strategically positioning yourself for job search success. Harnessing your focus, managing your anger, and presenting compelling evidence (read: quantitative numbers of achieved results) will transform your job search from a daunting endeavour into a structured, persuasive job search campaign that employers will notice.
The Power of Focus
Your job search success is mainly determined by what you're focused on, namely:
· What you focus on.
Your life is controlled by what you focus on; thus, focusing on the positives shapes your mindset for positive outcomes. Yes, layoffs, which the media loves to report to keep us addicted to the news, are a daily occurrence, but so is hiring. Don't let all the doom and gloom talk overshadow this fact. Focus on where you want to go, not on what others and the media want you to fear.
Bonus of not focusing on negatives: You'll be happier.
· Focus on how you can provide measurable value to employers.
If you're struggling with your job search, the likely reason is that you're not showing, along with providing evidence, employers how you can add tangible value to an employer's bottom line. Business is a numbers game, yet few job seekers speak about their numbers. If you don't focus on and talk about your numbers, how do you expect employers to see the value in hiring you?
Managing Your Anger
Displaying anger in public is never a good look. Professionals are expected to control their emotions, so public displays of anger are viewed as unprofessional.
LinkedIn has become a platform heavily populated with job seekers posting angry rants—fueled mainly by a sense of entitlement—bashing and criticizing employers, recruiters, and the government, proving many job seekers think the public display of their anger won't negatively affect their job search.
When you're unemployed, it's natural to be angry when your family, friends, and neighbours are employed. "Why me?" is a constant question in your head. Additionally, job searching is fraught with frustrations, such as not getting responses to your applications and being ghosted after interviews.
The key is acknowledging your anger and not letting it dictate your actions, such as adding to the angry rants on LinkedIn and other social media platforms, which employers will see.
Undoubtedly, rejection, which is inevitable when job hunting, causes the most anger. What works for me is to reframe rejections, be it through being ghosted, email, a call or text, as "Every 'No' brings me one step closer to a 'Yes.'"
Additionally, I've significantly reduced triggering my anger by eliminating any sense of entitlement and keeping my expectations in check. Neither you nor I are owed anything, including a job, respect, empathy, understanding, agreement, or even love. A sense of entitlement and anger are intrinsically linked. The more rights you perceive you have, the more anger you need to defend them. Losing any sense of entitlement you may have will make you less angry, which has no place in a job search.
Presenting Evidence
As I stated earlier, business is a numbers game. Since all business decisions, including hiring, are based on numbers, presenting evidence in the form of quantitative numbers is crucial.
Which candidate would you contact to set up an interview if you were hiring a social media manager:
· "Managed Fabian Publishing's social media accounts, posting content daily."
· “Designed and executed Fabian Publishing's global social media strategy across 8.7 million LinkedIn, X/Twitter, Instagram and Facebook followers. Through consistent engagement with customers, followers, and influencers, increased social media lead generation by 46% year-over-year, generating in 2023 $7.6 million in revenue.”
Numerical evidence, not generic statements or opinions, is how you prove your value to employers. Stating you're a "team player" or "results-driven," as opposed to "I'm part of an inside sales team that generated in 2023 $8.5 million in sales," or "In 2023 I managed three company-wide software implementations, all of which came under budget," is meaningless to an employer.
Despite all the job search advice offered, I still see resumes and LinkedIn profiles listing generic responsibilities rather than accomplishments backed by numbers. A statement such as "managed a team" doesn't convey your management responsibilities or your team's achievements under your leadership. "Led a team of five to increase sales by 20%, from $3.7 million to $4.44 million, within six months" shows the value of your management skills.
Throughout your job search, constantly think of all the numbers you can provide—revenue generated, number of new clients, cost savings, reduced workload, waste reduction—as evidence to employers why you'd be a great value-add to their business.
The Job Seekers' Trinity—focusing on the positive, managing your anger and providing evidence—is a framework that'll increase the effectiveness of your job search activities and make you stand out in today's hyper-competitive
_____________________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com
Presidential election in the United States and Canada’s Future
Presidential election in the
United States and Canada’s Future
by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC,
FEC, CET, P. Eng.
Former Member of Parliament
Pickering-Scarborough East
With the presidential and general elections over in the United States, resulting in the re-election of President Donald Trump of the Republican Party, we can expect a new era to begin.
Certainly, these elections will have a deep effect in Canada due to the proximity and strong historical connections between the two countries. Clearly it was not the result that many governments of Europe or even Canada wanted. Now the government of Canada needs to adapt and change accordingly; admittedly a drastic and difficult change to for our political leaders to undertake.
I think that following his first mandate President Trump learned a lot and was capable of regaining the presidency of the United States despite many obstacles and against most of the political experts’ and main media’s predictions. It will be interesting to see how the political leadership of our two countries will react to this new and mostly unexpected situation.
The decisive new element in the political life of the United States is a major shift toward the interests of the American nation, with a drastically reduced concentration on globalist issues. This will affect our bilateral relations on many fronts, especially on the economic and immigration fronts.
President Trump, throughout this latest election campaign, has threatened to impose across-the-board tariffs on imports, to reopen America's trilateral free-trade agreement with Canada and Mexico, and to launch a mass deportation operation, evidently raising fears of a mass influx of American deportees into Canada.
For example, trade experts and industry representatives have raised concerns about the potential consequences on both the American and Canadian economies of President Trump’s promised tariffs of 10 per cent or more on imported goods. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce estimates the resulting economic impact in this country would be a $30 billion loss annually.
On the immigration side, President Trump has said he would begin deportations on Day One. His announcement in 2017 to end residency rights for those from Central America and elsewhere led to a surge across our border. Canada clarified with the Biden administration the Safe Third Country agreement reached with the George W. Bush administration as part of the Smart Border accord after 9-11 that curtailed migrant visa shopping.
In anticipation of a potential surge of refugees and undocumented persons currently living in the United States, Canada needs to go to the Trump transition team with a sound and clear plan.
In the longer term, Canada needs to discuss a joint binational border administration with the US that must include a shared approach to the people and goods entering our perimeter.
Like it or not, borders are thickening with the United States. There continues to be a perception among some American legislators that Canada is ‘soft’ on who Canada lets in.
A border pact will require Canada to share more information. The United States wants Canada to give them a list of convicted child molesters. Why are we hesitating?
When Canada hemmed and hawed on sharing passenger manifests of flights crossing into United States airspace, the United States said ‘Fine, don’t fly in our air space”. In the end,' Canada provided the flight manifests.
If the Canadian government does not act quickly and wisely, Canada risks having the walls and wires, hummers and helicopters along with the visas that apply to the southern border of the United States. So, let’s think big and start discussions on a new binational approach to border management.
Dealing with and managing the relationship with Uncle Sam has been a constant in Canadian foreign policy since before Confederation.
For the first century after the break-up of British North America there was always the threat that the US would fulfill its ‘manifest destiny’ and absorb Canada as it did with Mexico, taking a substantial chunk of their territory.
We avoided that fate through pragmatic diplomacy, by creating institutions and an evolving web of agreements and arrangements that we keep evergreen. At their best they develop norms and rules and include dispute settlement.
Dealing with the United States requires patience and perseverance. Canada must resist the temptation to pontificate and preach. Canada’s government needs to keep a vigilant eye on the administration’s agenda, identifying when we can be helpful and when we need to stand up for Canada.
That means taking the initiative and coming up with imaginative solutions. Importantly, it means following through on Canada’s commitments.
This is how Canada can achieve and level the playing field with the United States.
It is how Canada must manage president Trump’s second term.
The question is, will the government of Canada and the opposition parties be able to work together in the quest to get the best for the country from the new administration that will be taking power at the beginning of 2025?
Clearly, we live in interesting times.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)