Showing posts with label #Central. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #Central. Show all posts

Saturday, June 1, 2024

The Surprising Reality of Ukraine's Middle-Aged Soldiers

By Dale Jodoin In Ukraine, most soldiers fighting on the front lines are middle-aged, with an average age of around 43 years years old. This is surprising because we often think of soldiers as being young and fit. However, in Ukraine, many older men, often aged between 40 and 65, are the ones stepping up to defend their country. There are several reasons why Ukraine's soldiers are older. First, there are simply more men aged 40-59 in Ukraine than there are men aged 18-25. This means there are more middle-aged men available to serve. Additionally, Ukraine's conscription policies have traditionally aimed to protect younger men by setting the lower age limit for conscription at 27. The idea was to safeguard the future of the country by keeping younger generations out of the war. However, due to the ongoing conflict and high casualty rates, there have been talks about lowering this age to 25 to get more recruits. Older soldiers bring both advantages and challenges to the Ukrainian military. On the one hand, they often have more life experience and can be more psychologically stable, which is very important in the high-stress environment of war. They also tend to have valuable technical skills and professional experience that can be very useful. On the other hand, older soldiers might not be as physically resilient or quick to recover from the strains of combat compared to younger soldiers. This can impact their effectiveness in demanding roles that require rapid movement and physical endurance. If a similar situation were to occur in countries like Canada or the United States, the implications would be significant. Middle-aged soldiers might be able to provide steady, experienced presence on the battlefield, but there would also be concerns about their physical capacity to endure prolonged combat operations. One major difference in these countries, however, is the cultural attitude towards military service and resilience. In recent years, there has been a noticeable trend among younger generations in Canada and the United States to seek out "safe spaces" and prioritize mental well-being over traditional notions of toughness and resilience. This trend is often criticized by older generations who view it as a sign of weakening resolve and a lack of preparedness for the harsh realities of life, including military service. The focus on mental health and safe spaces is not inherently negative; it represents a shift towards recognizing and addressing psychological well-being. However, in the context of military readiness, this cultural shift poses unique challenges. The military environment is inherently stressful and demanding, requiring individuals to cope with high-pressure situations and physical strain. In Canada, for instance, the Canadian Armed Forces have faced challenges in recruiting and retaining personnel. The emphasis on creating an inclusive and supportive environment has sometimes clashed with the traditional demands of military service. Efforts to modernize the military culture to be more inclusive and supportive of mental health are ongoing, but they must be balanced with maintaining operational effectiveness. In the United States, similar trends are evident. The U.S. military has also had to adapt to changing societal norms and attitudes towards mental health. The integration of mental health services and support systems within the military is crucial, but it also highlights the tension between supporting soldiers' well-being and preparing them for the rigors of combat. If Canada or the United States were to face a situation similar to Ukraine's, where a significant portion of the military forces is composed of older soldiers, it would necessitate a reevaluation of current policies and cultural attitudes. The experience of Ukraine shows that older soldiers can be effective, but they also face unique challenges that must be addressed. One potential approach is to foster a culture of resilience and readiness among younger generations without dismissing the importance of mental health. This can be achieved through comprehensive training programs that emphasize physical fitness, mental toughness, and adaptability, while also providing robust support systems for mental health. Additionally, policies that encourage voluntary service and provide incentives for younger individuals to join the military can help balance the age distribution of military personnel. This could include educational benefits, career development opportunities, and other incentives that make military service an attractive option for young people. Ukraine's reliance on older soldiers highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of an aging military force. While they bring valuable experience and stability, the physical demands of modern warfare may require a reevaluation of current conscription policies to ensure a more balanced and capable military force. For Canada and the United States, the challenge lies in fostering a culture that values both resilience and mental well-being, ensuring that the military remains prepared for future conflicts while supporting the psychological health of its personnel.

Sharing Too Much Information May Hinder Your Job Search

By Nick Kossovan In Mad Men’s season four episode Waldorf Stories, Roger Sterling tells Don Draper, who'd just interviewed a junior copywriter candidate, who unbeknownst to him was Roger's wife's cousin, advice he gave him he knew seldom works in the corporate world: "I told him to be himself. That was pretty mean, I guess." The key to getting hired is telling your interviewer what they want to hear without sinking yourself by telling him or her what they don't need to hear. Always remember: Employers make judgments about what you communicate. For example, if you live close to the employer, you should let them know, as this will be seen as a plus, whereas if you don't, you should keep it to yourself. (e.g., If you live quite a distance away, stating your address on your resume could disqualify you as a candidate who's not "geographically desirable.) The hiring process, especially at the interview stage, is a process of disqualification. 500 applicants, one position to fill necessitates disqualifying 499 candidates, which makes hiring a fundamentally adversarial process. Therefore, the fewer excuses you give an employer why they shouldn't hire you, the higher your odds of getting hired. I see it all the time: job seekers who run themselves into walls by oversharing. More than once, I wanted to say, "Don't say that! You're coming across as if you can't control yourself." Nobody is entitled to acceptance. I know from firsthand experience that being "myself" often has consequences. Call it arrogance or overconfidence; in terms of job searching, I'm a let the chips fall where they may type of guy. For me, it's imperative I feel welcomed and I'm a good fit. Therefore, throughout the hiring process, I don't hide my personality, hobbies or how I approach and value my work. If I'm not hired for those reasons—being who I am— which has happened many times, then that's not an employer I'd be comfortable working for; therefore, I averted what would have been a negative working situation. Despite my "this is who I am" attitude, I'll say this as someone who has worked in the corporate world for longer than I care to admit: Sometimes, you need to filter, especially when speaking with someone who can hire you. Learning how to read a room—call it having "social intelligence"—and using your reading to know what to say and, more importantly, what not to say is a skill that'll serve you well. It should go without saying that what you communicate about yourself will influence what the other person thinks of you. Hence, before "communicating," ask yourself if what you're about to reveal, be it on your resume, LinkedIn profile, social media or especially during an interview, will help or hinder you. What will the reader/person you're speaking with do with the information you're offering? Over the years, I've interviewed many different personality-type people, resulting in some interesting interactions. I once had a candidate reveal they were seriously contemplating having a sex change and were in the process of consulting doctors. I still have no clue why they decided to bring this up. When communicating with employers, only share relevant information about yourself that will sell you as an asset to the bottom line and enable them to gauge you as you want them to, thereby influencing some, but not all, of the employer's hiring decision-making narrative, including, but again not all, biases. For me, I want a potential employer to gauge whether I, as authentic me (key), will be a fit, thus why I communicate who I am as much as I do. I don't want to put on a show to be accepted, only to end up in a workplace that doesn't work for me. NOTE: I speak for myself. Suppose you want to convey you're a team player. In this case, besides offering examples from your work history, mention you play in an adult baseball league. Want your interviewer to see you as someone creative? Then, mention you paint landscapes. Compassionate? Let your interviewer know you volunteer at the local suicide hotline. Healthy? Mention you jog 5 km every evening to unwind. Fair or not, everything you communicate about yourself, including your speech (e.g., vocabulary, pronunciation, use of profanity) and physical appearance, is used to form an opinion about you. You control much of how people perceive you, which means you control the determining hiring decision factor: Hiring managers hire candidates they feel good about. As a rule, steer clear of the obvious taboo subjects—religion, politics, gossip, conspiracy theories and partying. In addition, don't bring up: · Your finances. · Having a side business. · Your retirement plans. · That you're desperate for a job. · Health issues that won't interfere with your job performance or require special accommodations. When you overshare, especially during an interview, you increase the odds of providing information that'll be used to disqualify you. Before you say anything, post it on your social media or LinkedIn profile or include it on your resume; think carefully about how you'll be perceived, then act accordingly _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

NOT IN MY BACKYARD

By Rosaldo Russo Allow me to begin this column by thanking the Oshawa/Central newspaper for allowing me the opportunity and access to the press. Not to many if any allow an average person like me to tell the world what I see and think. In my opinion. The Editor/Publisher is a real upstanding type of guy. He shoots from the hip and hold traditional core values. My name is Rosaldo Russo. I came to this great country to make a better life for myself and my family. I thank Canada for everything it has allowed me to do and earn. I worked construction all my life. I know the value of hard work and honesty. I remember as a boy my father always telling me to work hard and buy land. So I did. I remember days when I did not have enough to eat. I go to work... but I did not wait for hand outs. I rounded up my pride my skill and my determination to succeed and went to work. In those days the only benefits we received was the fact we were employed. Before retiring I was the owner and operator of local material supply company that allowed me to retired without worry. Now that I have time to enjoy life. I look around me and have some concern for future generations. I see that the world is finished. What is wrong with this country? What is wrong with out Federal government? OK, that is a rhetorical question as we all know what is wrong with it and counting the days to an election. Then, again. Do we truly have an alternative choice. Are we jumping from the frying pan on to the fire, when it comes to Canadian politics? I personally think, that it should be illegal to support foreign wars. That we as the Canadian government should stop supporting foreign civil wars and or war in general. We are supposed to be a peace loving nation. Not one that take sides on global conflict in order to obtain votes back home and or make it look like the average Canadian gives a rats ass. As Canadians we should care about Canadians. We should stop funding the Ukraine for example and use that money to dissolve the suffering happening on a daily basis right here at home. Suffering at many levels. From the person loosing their home due to foreclosure. To the many that are forced to live on the streets. Many today that live on our streets are not drug addicts. They are folk like me and you. Living in cars. In some cases with young children. Sure there is social services. But there is also basic human pride. I know personally. I would never turn to hand out. I would work 5 jobs 24 hours a day in order to preserve my dignity and pride, and not that flag waving rainbow crap. We as Canadians need to raise our standards. Get rid of this everything is ok mentality. Unify our people so that our customs, traditions and culture is preserved. I was born in Italy. I cam to this country for a reason. To contribute and to be proud to call myself Canadian. I do not expect anyone to learn my language. To eat my food. I will not dress other than within Canadian norms and traditions. I read about students negotiating at Durham College with administrators over the Palestine situation. I say, throw them in jail. Take their academic status away and if not from this country. Send them back. I don’t have to accept you. You on the other hand owe Canada for the opportunity to be here. CANADA FOR CANADIANS.

Kissing The Cobra

from Wayne & Tamara I am currently separated from my husband who is having an affair. We've been married four years, and we just bought a condominium. Things were looking hopeful. We've had some challenges, including him not working much while I supported him emotionally and financially. For the past seven months he's had a steady income, thus we bought the condo. He cruelly announced to me in an unsafe place--at a conference where I had professional commitments--that he loves another woman and would have married her if he hadn't married me. I am heartbroken. We've been to marriage counseling. I've been in shock, dismay, anger, and terrible grief as I adore my husband and have been faithful to him throughout our marriage. Yet I am not willing to tolerate his behavior, so I filed for divorce. I found out the condominium we bought is near where this woman lives. My husband wants us to continue and have her in our marriage, too. He calls her his concubine. It's so insane! I've seen them together, and I go into shock and then extreme anger at this violation. The violation is further increased by the fact she is a doctor of divinity, a minister, and active in a local spiritual community. My husband is a professional, and we both have a spiritual path we follow. I am so confused and sorrowful. I don't even know what to ask, except I keep reading about other couples who overcome infidelity. Leslie Leslie, a well-known television executive, now deceased, was famous for his affairs. When he finished with a woman, he would invite her to lunch at a posh restaurant. There, over lobster or foie gras, he would announce the end of their affair. He counted on the public surroundings to control her dismay and anger. This executive's nickname was the "Smiling Cobra." Your husband is another smiling cobra. Telling you at the conference was a mean-spirited and selfish thing to do. You say you are suffering from emotional numbness, sleep disturbances, and disruption of social functioning. That condition has a name: post-traumatic stress disorder. PTSD happens to people who have suffered life-threatening events like military combat, natural disaster, or violent personal assault. You have suffered a personal assault and a marital disaster. You are proceeding on the correct course. Your husband's desire to keep a "concubine" ended the marriage. Reach out to helpful people and seek individual counseling from a professional experienced in dealing with traumatic stress. Wayne & Tamara Like Versus Love I've been in a relationship with a loving, sweet man. From the start we spent a great deal of time together, usually at his house because he has a lot of issues with panic attacks and driving. As time went on he told me he loved me and could see spending the rest of his life with me. I thought he was incredibly hot, and to be honest, I could not keep my hands off him. A month ago I woke up one morning and felt numb. Everything that seemed perfect about him before seemed imperfect. I started analyzing him and finding a million things wrong. I even started dreading his daily calls. He did nothing wrong, I mean, he's been the same person all along. Why do I feel this way? My friends think I may have commitment issues. Samantha Samantha, we had a golden retriever named Einstein. He had hip dysplasia and arthritis, even as a youngster. Some might have seen a million things wrong with him, but we never did because we loved him so. With this man you narrowed your focus to the pleasurable elements, but at the first inkling of making this permanent, you were forced to see the rest of him. That's not a commitment problem. That's realizing you don't want to own all the things you see wrong with this man. Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

Saturday, May 25, 2024

IN A FEW DAYS IT’S PRIDE MONTH, OOPS, I MEANT JUNE

~~~ THOUGHTS & COMMENTS ~~~ By D. Lynne, Associate Columnist ```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` June is a month with Many Month Long Celebrations some of which are as follows: - Seniors Month - National Indigenous History Month - Italian Heritage Month - Filipino Heritage Month - Portuguese Heritage Month - I apologize if I missed some. Unfortunately we hear little of these celebrations, they tend to be forgotten to be overshadowed byPride Month or, as it is now referred to as, Pride Season, June - Sep. WHY? Hmmm ….. the majority of people I have spoken with or heard from over this past year, have a live and let live attitude. They have nothing against the LGBTQ. However, as parents, and as grandparents, as aunts & uncles, as brothers & sisters, they do resent the lies, the promotions, the campaigns which our governments, through schools, the children’s aide societies, medical associations etc. are subjecting our young children to. Some of these topics we wrote about previously and will most likely write about again at another time. For now, the concerns fall on the way, this past year especially, Pride Flags symbols and drawings are all over classrooms, on hallway bulletin boards, on driveways & crosswalks. Why is it that everyone is promoting the Rainbow Flag? Is it for fear of being called homophobic or transphobic etc? Clothing manufacturers, & other manufacturers, and retailers do it for the money. Hmmm ….. why is there such a big push on the Rainbow Flag? Ask yourself, what’s the end goal We were taught that the Rainbow was God’s promise never to bring the floods as a judgment. Part of the Pride movement being promoted is “Drag Queens’ and the “Pride Parade”. Why does the Children’s Aide Society promote Drag Queens Story Times in libraries? Most Drag Queens appear to present themselves as females in flashy make-up and sexy clothes. Drag Queens have always been adult entertainment and now they’re being promoted as proper entertainment for children, toddlers and babies? Hmmm ….. I have to ask, what are the people thinking that promote this, what is their reasoning and why? I heard that it was said by Pickering Councillor Cook, that “Drag Queens were no different than Mrs. Doubtfire” Hmmm … she thinks that Robin Williams character being a divorced man who dressed up as a gray-haired grandmotherly type to look after his children is the same as men dressing as overly sexual females to be around minors is the same thing? The Pride Parade some think it’s great fun others find it adult entertainment, what do you think? Before you answer let me ask you a few questions? • would you walk naked around your children (toddlers to 16 yr)? • would you take your children to a nudist colony with you? • would you take your children to a female or male strip show? • would you take your children to a porn show? All of the above is considered Adult entertainment and requires a proof of age to attend so why is it okay to subject your underage minor children to the nudity, to people in sex games attire, to people dressed in fake gross genitals, etc. you might deny that this happens but the proof is in the pictures many of which were taken each year at the pride Parade by professional photographers who posted on the internet Hmmm ….. If you walk down the street nude you would get arrested for indecent exposure, so why is it okay to be nude on the streets of Toronto because you are in the Pride Parade?? PRIDE MONTH - DOES IT MAKE YOU PROUD

WHERE IS THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER?

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor This week I received this email. I am appalled at what is going on in our City. As your representative I vow to make things right and bring back dignity, respect and accountability. Please have a read: The Pickering Council Controversy: Undermining Democracy, Public Feedback, and Engaging in Bullying Introduction The City of Pickering’s council has recently been thrust into the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. Controversies surrounding the conduct of its members, including the mayor, have brought to light issues that undermine democratic principles, stifle public feedback, and foster an environment of discrimination and bullying. This article aims to unpack the detailed findings of a report that reveals the systemic problems within the council, highlighting the importance of open debate, respectful conduct, and transparent governance. The Importance of Debate in Democracy Debate is the lifeblood of democracy. It ensures that diverse viewpoints are considered and that decisions reflect the collective will of the people. Robust debate in municipal councils is essential as it allows for the thorough examination of policies, encourages transparency, and holds elected officials accountable. More importantly, it provides a platform for council members to represent their constituents’ interests effectively. In Pickering, however, this democratic ideal seems to be under threat. The council’s recent behavior shows a disturbing trend of shutting down dissenting voices and dismissing legitimate concerns, leading to a toxic and unproductive political environment. Council Conduct: A Case Study in Inappropriate Behavior Numerous reports highlight instances of bullying, inappropriate behavior, and unprofessionalism within the Pickering council. The mayor’s conduct has been particularly troubling, with instances of name-calling and derogatory remarks directed at both council members and the public. Example 1: During a council meeting, the mayor referred to Councilor Robinson’s supporters as “nut cases.” This unprofessional language not only disrespects differing viewpoints but also undermines the decorum expected of public officials. Example 2: The mayor has a history of inflammatory comments, calling individuals “Nazi supporters” and “conspiracy theorists,” both during public forums and on social media. Such behavior polarizes the community and stifles constructive dialogue. Example 3: Councilor Lisa Robinson has faced repeated interruptions and unjustified reprimands from the mayor whenever she attempts to discuss critical issues like the World Economic Forum (WEF) or smart cities, hindering her ability to represent her constituents effectively. Inappropriate Social Media Conduct The mayor’s use of social media as a platform to belittle and insult critics further exacerbates the toxic political climate in Pickering. Instance 1: On multiple occasions, the mayor has posted derogatory comments about Councilor Robinson, implying her motions were not worth considering. This public shaming undermines her credibility and deters other council members from voicing dissenting opinions. Instance 2: In response to a constituent’s criticism, the mayor told them to “go have another drink,” insinuating they were drunk. Such responses are dismissive and unprofessional, discouraging public engagement. Instance 3: Labeling critics as “conspiracy theorists” and “Nazi supporters” on social media not only dismisses their concerns but also creates a hostile environment for anyone who disagrees with the mayor’s views. Discrimination and Bullying: Targeting Councilors The treatment of Councilor Lisa Robinson exemplifies the discriminatory and bullying behavior within the council. Her motions, which aimed to promote neutrality and inclusivity, were met with unwarranted backlash and accusations of transphobia and homophobia. Motion 1: Robinson proposed a motion to prohibit the flying of non-governmental flags on city flagpoles, intending to maintain governmental neutrality. Despite not targeting any specific group, she was accused of transphobia and homophobia. Motion 2: A motion to ensure inclusive washroom policies was twisted to portray Robinson as transphobic, despite her clear intent to offer more options and inclusivity. Motion 3: Robinson’s motion to impose an age restriction on certain events, such as Pride and drag queen story time, was met with severe backlash and led to the council suspending her pay for three months, a punitive measure that disproportionately affected her as a single mother. Financial Hardship and Community Support The council’s decision to suspend Robinson’s pay left her in a precarious financial situation. Community members had to pool resources to help her cover basic expenses, underscoring the severity of the council’s punitive actions and the lack of internal support she received. Trespass Orders: Silencing Dissent The council has also used trespass orders as a tool to silence dissent and control public participation. Incident 1: A resident was issued a trespass order for refusing to stop talking during a meeting. This response was disproportionate and highlights the council’s intolerance for dissenting voices. Incident 2: A videographer was trespassed after his equipment was damaged by members of the LGBT community. Instead of addressing the perpetrators, the council targeted the videographer, silencing his efforts to document and share council proceedings. Integrity Commissioner Complaints: Bias and Selective Enforcement Over 27 reports have been filed against various council members, yet only two complaints against Councilor Robinson have been addressed. This selective enforcement raises serious questions about the Integrity Commissioner’s impartiality and effectiveness. Psychological Harassment: A Toxic Environment Psychological harassment, including exclusion, public humiliation, and gaslighting, is pervasive within the Pickering council. Example 1: Robinson’s photo was deliberately cropped out of official event pictures, marginalizing her and diminishing her presence within the council. Example 2: Public meetings and social media platforms are used to humiliate and demean Robinson, further stifling her ability to represent her constituents. Example 3: Gaslighting tactics, such as dismissing her complaints and twisting her intentions, undermine her credibility and confidence. Undermining Public Debate and Feedback The council has made several procedural changes that limit public participation and transparency. New bylaws restrict non-Pickering residents from speaking on agenda items and limit the ability of residents to introduce new topics for discussion. Exacerbating Problems: Shutting Down Debate and Bullying Instead of addressing concerns through open debate, the council has shut down dissenting voices and bullied those who speak out. This approach alienates a significant portion of the community, fostering resentment and distrust. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

The Role of Municipal Government:

By Maurice Brenner Regional Councillor Ward 1 Pickering Reflecting back 200 Years- Pickering/Durham Region Recently I accepted an invitation to speak to a High School Class on the history and role of Municipal Government (Local Government) and what better way to gather my content, I turned to “Google”. What I found was a journey into the history of Pickering/Durham and the role that those early settlers played to change history. A Citizen Revolt: In the mid-1800s, The Crown(England) appointed members of conservative local elites (Tories) who monopolized political power in settler colonies. These Colonies were situated in Upper and Lower Canada (present-day Ontario and Quebec) Initially political reformers led primarily by professionals (lawyers, journalists, and doctors) attempted to change the system through peaceful, constitutional means. When this failed, and with growing frustrations, a group referred to as the “Rebels” embarked in an armed rebellion in 1837/1838. Many of the leaders of these armed rebels lived in what we today refer to as Pickering and Durham. While the British Government forces were able to crush the uprisings, 1,500 people were arrested, 250 deported and 50 hung. One of the most known leaders of the rebels was Peter Mathews, a farmer who moved to Pickering Township in 1799. Mathews served along side Isaac Brock in the militia during the War of 1812. In 1837 with the British imposing their power on the settlers, Mathews became active in the Political Union movement hoping to pressure the British Government to grant reforms. When this failed Mathews lead a group from Pickering as part of the William Lyon Mackenzie upraising. As the battle unfolded Mathews and his group of 60 men from Pickering, took part in the Rebellion of 1837. It was a short battle that cost Mathews his life. He pleaded guilty of “Treason” hoping for mercy but was sentenced to hang, making the Pickering settler an example. Today in the small Hamlet of Brougham a short distance from the Mathews farm, a Heritage Plaque was erected recognizing the important role Mathews played and died for, fighting for Local Government and Local Decision making. Creation of Local Government and the Municipal Act: With the Rebellion over following the hanging of Mathews ,in 1838, the British government sent Lord Durham (Who Durham Region has been named after) to investigate the causes of the rebellions and to recommend reforms to prevent a similar up rising from re-occurring. Today we would call this a Public Inquiry. Acting on the Lord Durham Report, in 1841, the “District Councils Act was past creating Municipal Government in Ontario. This Act in 1849 gave birth to one of the first acts of the newly formed Government of Ontario, the creation of “local self government” the Municipal Act of 1849 which provided for the incorporation of local Municipalities. By1868, Ontario had local representation, 36 counties, 399 townships and 104 cities, towns and villages. All with duly elected leaders from a cross section of what we refer today as communities, to govern and make inclusive decisions with-in its legislated mandate. Flash Forward 2024: What has changed? While Municipalities were created out of an uprising of rebels from Pickering resulting in self governance, the role of Municipalities and their elected leaders continues to be threatened. Communities, Local leaders, and Councils alike are frustrated at being treated like children and told what is best for us. But Centuries later, it is not by the British Government of the 1800s but by the same body that was created through Confederation to protect self governance, the Provincial Government of Ontario. We as Municipal politicians are told we are the children of the Province. Through amendments of the Municipal Act and various pieces of Legislation, under protest boundaries have been realigned, forced amalgamations have been imposed. We have have been threaten of elimination if we do not co-operate. We have been stripped of important decision making in Planning, and now the introduction of Strong Mayor Powers. As Councillors we feel disrespected with our ability to govern as elected officials eroded. So ask your selves what has changed in 200 years. To be clear, I am not promoting civil unrest nor a rebellion. As Communities and as Municipal Councils by working together, we do have the power of the pen and the ability to pass resolutions for positive change. By working in partnership with communities, we can make a difference the same as a modern day Peter Mathews would through grass route local decision making something that should never be compromised.

D-Day anniversary 2024

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East nIn Canada today, we are at war with high inflation, uncertain economic times and international tension due to the continuing war in Ukraine and the Middle East. We therefore need to remember as never before, and reflect on the sacrifices that our ancestors have made for us. They should not have fought in vain to secure our freedom, to keep democracy alive in our country and the comfortable standard of living that we have enjoyed for generations. It is time to cherish their memory and learn from their patriotism. We need to ensure that their efforts to win over the evils of fascism were not in vain. Particularly during this new dark period that threatens our very existence, we need to keep up our courage and stand up against our adversaries as our ancestors have done. We need to stay strong in the face of today’s unprecedented challenges. We are currently facing a crucial time in our history in fighting the evil of an unknown upcoming new world order and related societal malaises. In combination, the consequences of the past pandemic and social dysfunction are similar to fighting a new kind of world war with worldwide consequences and yet unforeseen effects on Canadians. On 6 June we are marking the eightieth anniversary of D-Day, the beginning of the Battle of Normandy, along a 100 km stretch of French coastline across the English Channel from Great Britain. This was the largest seaborne invasion in history and a crucial day in winning the war against evil; Nazi Germany. The assault on the beaches of Normandy by British, American, and Canadian troops on the 6th of June 1944, who would then fight their way across Western Europe, has gone down in history as a memorable event. The codenames of where the troops landed — Omaha and Utah for the Americans, Gold and Sword for the British, and Juno for the Canadians — remain familiar today. The Normandy landings, Operation Overlord, marked the beginning of the end of six long years of conflict between Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and the Allied forces. The development of the role for Canada in the D-Day invasion has a history going back a few years. Following the Dunkirk evacuation Canadians began to come over to Great Britain. They were well-prepared and took on the role of defending the British Isles. They built up around the south coast of England and operated in a defensive and anti-invasion role from May 1940 to July 1943. At that time the 1st Canadian Division was detached and sent to Italy, but the bulk of Canadian forces remained in Britain for all those years. Canadian sailors, soldiers and airmen played a critical role in the Allied invasion of Normandy, beginning the bloody campaign to liberate Western Europe from Nazi occupation. Nearly 150,000 Allied troops landed or parachuted into the invasion area on D-Day, including 14,000 Canadians at Juno Beach. The Royal Canadian Navy contributed 110 ships and 10,000 sailors and the RCAF contributed 15 fighter and fighter-bomber squadrons to the assault. Total Allied casualties on D-Day reached more than 10,000. By the end of the Battle of Normandy, the Allies had suffered 209,000 casualties, including more than 18,700 Canadians. Over 5,000 Canadian soldiers died. From the D-Day landings on the 6th of June 1944 through to the encirclement of the German army at Falaise on the 21st of August this was one of the pivotal events of the Second World War and the scene of some of Canada's greatest feats of arms. Juno Beach was the Allied code name for a 10 km stretch of French coast. It fell to more than 14,000 volunteer soldiers from across Canada, under Major-General Rod Keller, commander of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division, to storm the Juno Beach coast line. They seized the beach and its seaside villages while under intense fire from German defenders — an extraordinary example of military skill, reinforced by countless acts of personal courage. The 3rd Infantry Division took heavy casualties in its first wave of attack but took control of the beach by the end of the day. There were 1,074 Canadian casualties, including 359 killed. All things considered, the Canadian troops did very well on D-Day. The Canadians and the British in the Gold and Juno sector made it farther inland than any of the other invasion forces. They had managed to link up their forward units some distance inland, which was a measure of success. At the end of the day, the Queen’s Own Rifles had actually captured its objective, which was short of the overall divisional objective but goes to show that some of the Canadian units were quite successful in the first hours. Their sacrifices will not be forgotten even though their generation is starting to fade into the fog of history. For the time being D-Day still seems to be in the Canadian public’s consciousness. Their memory must be preserved for the millennials and generations to come in order to eliminate the causes of further conflagrations. D-Day embodied the courage and determination to prevail in that war. It was fought over issues that are still alive today — such as ideology, globalism and injustice. It was an exceptionally difficult and hazardous military operation. It was an operation in which Canadians took a major central role in the war to preserve freedom and democracy. For these reasons and more, it’s important to keep the memory of D-Day alive. The dead, along with scores of other Canadians killed in the fighting during the weeks that followed, are buried in the serene and beautiful Canadian War Cemetery at Bény-sur-Mer, just behind Juno Beach. This, and numerous other memorials throughout Courseulles, Bernières and St. Aubin-sur-Mer, commemorate Canada’s sacrifice on D-Day. A private museum, the Juno Beach Centre, overlooking the beach at Courseulles, also tells the story of Canada’s role in the invasion of Normandy. Every year on the 6th of June, the people of the villages along Juno Beach pay tribute to the men and women who fought and died there. They parade through streets festooned with maple leaf flags and hold services and vigils along parts of the seawall, in memory of their Canadian liberators. Long live their memory! Long live the courage those men and women demonstrated. May our current generations and governments show just as much courage in our current hour of need. We can’t afford to wait for someone else to fight for our rights and freedom. We must all take a stand against the tyranny of incompetent leadership, political correctness at the expense of merit, and the stripping away of our individual freedoms in the name of political expediency. Wake up Canada! Have we forgotten; what are we waiting for?

The Paradox of Being Fat and Starving: A Modern Dilemma

By Dale Jodoin In today's world, particularly in countries like Canada, the United States, and Great Britain, we are witnessing a paradoxical situation: people are both fat and starving. This might sound contradictory, but let me explain how this scenario has come to be. Historical Context: The Great Depression Back in the Great Depression, men and women were struggling to find food. They were skinnier and fitter because they had limited access to food. The available food was mostly real, unprocessed food. Vegetables were readily available, and people ate what they grew. This trend continued up until the 1970s, with diets consisting of fresh vegetables, regular dishes, and meats. Then something changed in the late 70s. The Rise of Processed Foods Around this time, food manufacturers discovered how to make chemicals taste like fruits and vegetables. They also figured out how to add high fructose corn syrup to increase addiction to these foods. Today, processed meats have more sodium, fat, and sugars than ever before. Even fruits, which used to be a healthy choice, have been bred to contain more sugar, increasing their addictive potential. Consider this: we have cleaning products that contain real lemon juice, but the lemon drinks we consume have artificial flavors and colors instead of real lemon. This discrepancy illustrates the shift from real, nutritious food to artificial, chemically enhanced products. The Cost of Eating Healthy The price of vegetables today is often by the pound, not by the head or by quantity as it used to be. A nutritious meal can cost $15 to $20, while a meal high in fats and sugars costs around $12. This price difference makes it difficult for many to afford healthy meals. The food industry prioritizes profit over health. Processed foods are cheaper to produce and more profitable, leading to an increase in their availability and consumption. This is why people in Canada, the United States, and Great Britain are struggling to afford nutritious food, contributing to the rise in obesity despite high levels of food insecurity. The Struggle with Weight and Health Many believe that simply exercising more and eating less will solve the problem. However, the issue is more complex. When people can't afford nutritious food, they turn to cheaper, unhealthy options. This not only leads to weight gain but also contributes to other health issues like diabetes and high blood pressure. The Impact of Stress It's important to understand that stress plays a significant role in this problem. People who are overweight often face stress related to their finances and food choices. They worry that every meal might be their last decent one for a while. This stress can exacerbate the problem, making it harder to maintain a healthy weight. Misguided Solutions and Public Perception Some people advocate for higher taxes on junk food and restaurant meals to discourage their consumption. However, this approach is misguided. It's not just about making unhealthy food more expensive; it's about making healthy food more accessible and affordable. Doctors often tell overweight individuals to eat less and exercise more. While well-intentioned, this advice fails to consider the complex socio-economic factors at play. Overweight individuals have likely tried various diets and exercise regimes without success, leading to frustration and despair. Food Addiction and Societal Attitudes Junk food is addictive, designed to be consumed in large quantities. People who can't afford "good" food are forced to consume addictive, unhealthy options. Food banks often provide canned goods and cereals, which, while helpful, are not the most nutritious choices. The government and food industry need to re-evaluate food processing standards to reduce harmful additives. Until this happens, we will continue to see an increase in obesity and related health issues. A Call for Compassion and Understanding When you encounter someone who is overweight, remember that they might be struggling with more than just their weight. They could be dealing with financial stress, food insecurity, and health issues. Instead of judgment, offer support and compassion. We don't have all the answers to this complex problem. But what we can do is show love and respect to those facing these challenges. Recognize that they have likely tried everything to lose weight and improve their health. The term "fat shaming" is not helpful; it only adds to the stress and shame they already feel. the issue of being fat and starving is a modern dilemma rooted in economic, social, and health factors. The food industry prioritizes profit over health, leading to the prevalence of addictive, unhealthy food. The cost of nutritious food is prohibitive for many, contributing to widespread obesity despite food insecurity. We need to approach this issue with compassion and understanding, recognizing the complex challenges faced by those who are overweight. Only by addressing the root causes and making healthy food more accessible can we hope to resolve this paradox and improve public health.

Unpleasant Truths

from Wayne & Tamara My in-laws have continually treated me as a second-class person with respect to my husband, their son. My husband and I both have PhDs., and we both are on the faculty at a research university. He is older, but I am a professor with a career and a purpose, also. I work full-time, cook every meal, clean our home, and I take impeccable care of myself because my husband deserves a fit, happy wife. Still, from his parents, I am not as worthy as their son. I receive Christmas cards addressed to Dr. and Mrs. instead of Drs, and when I speak about a topic on which I am an authority, they pretend not to hear me. They wait and ask the same information of my husband, who they immediately believe. If the conversation is not about how wonderful their son is, they have nothing to say. I am happy to brag on my spouse all day long, but the inequity of treatment hurts after seven years of marriage. As a result, when I see them, I am angry and resentful, overly loud and dogmatic, because I feel stepped on and undervalued. I am constantly mistaken on campus for a secretary (I am very young), and I handle that diplomatically and pleasantly, but these people know better. Gabrielle Gabrielle, when we are young, we learn where babies come from. This knowledge is called "the facts of life." As we grow older, we learn other facts of life, and sometimes these facts are unpleasant. The unpleasant fact you are facing is your in-laws' attitude. He is their son, and you are nothing to them. If you have children, they will be his children and their grandchildren. That is their attitude. You want a reasoned, kind way of changing their attitude, but you have been trying for years with no success. Why not accept your in-laws and recognize them for who they are? Each Christmas card is not a slap at you, it is simply mamma writing to her son. You don't have the ability to change who they are by your desire. Wayne & Tamara Self-Portrait I love my fiancé with all my heart and spirit, but I am receiving mixed signals from my future mother-in-law. First, I want to say I never planned on marriage, and I don't want children because I am selfish. I will not be a good little housewife and cater to my man's every need, but I will love him the best and only way I know how. My fiancé tells me his parents only want what will make us happy, and they want to see me at their house every week or two. But when my man is not around, his mother says things like, "You should give up being an artist and do nursing for the benefits." Or she says, "I was a housewife and will soon retire. I need someone else to cook big dinners for the holidays." She got me to stay for Easter, though I told them I did not want to. I even helped her cook dinner because she gave me this look that made me shrink inside. Now I don't want to hurt her, but I need to let her know who I am. What should I do? Caroline Caroline, for some reason good people have gotten it into their heads that they are not allowed to say the word ‘no.’ When you let your fiancé's mother have her way, you are lying to her about who you are. When you stand up to her, you are telling her the truth. Some people will balk and say you should give in to your future mother-in-law, but you cannot sustain that for the next 25 years. You are who you are, and when you let false politeness dictate your actions, you diminish who you are. Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

Saturday, May 18, 2024

Meeting Trump JR

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor The other day, I attended an event where I came face to face with none other than Donald Trump Jr. Yes, Trump's right-hand man. He seemed like just another man, yet he had style and poise. His charismatic attitude resembled that of John F. Kennedy—very relaxed and very sure of himself. A true Trump. As I stood before him, I understood why lesser men might resent him and look for fault and shame. He truly is a chip off the old block. I can understand why men like that are successful, yet persecuted and constantly attacked by envious and lesser types. Men like his father, who stand for what is right, not for what benefits them personally. Sure, Trump Sr. has his battle scars and has made mistakes, but these experiences make him a political powerhouse today. Trump knows the game; he knows how and where the loops are played. He is a renegade who does not play by the rules. Now in power, he exposes the corruption in democracy, the lies, and deceit—something that Democrats hate. I can understand the feeling of persecution by those who are supposed to be assisting and helping the betterment of all taxpayers. I am in no way near the level of play of either Trump Jr. or Trump Sr. These men lived lives of social privilege and saw corruption at work. As a first-time councillor, I am getting a bitter taste of the political game. I entered this profession with a clear and clean heart. I wanted to serve and achieve better for my community. I did not enter to just collect my pay, as some elected officials do. I did not seek office because I had no other employment offers. In today’s municipal government, many in it should resign. For them, the money is nothing but a pension fluff. For others, where else would they get paid for the job they are entrusted to do? They form groups of incompetence and denounce anyone actually working for the betterment of the general taxpayer. Look at our Mayor of Pickering. In my opinion, he constantly attacks me for speaking on behalf of you, the taxpayers of Pickering. My pay was cut for three months for speaking my mind, with no real chance to defend myself. Council meeting after council meeting, our Mayor has belittled me and called many of you names over public recordings. What makes this Mayor so insecure? Could it be because I am a woman? In his misogynist way, he has used every municipal resource to silence me, even passing by-laws on conduct that verge on violating Human Rights and Freedom of Speech. Who is this man that can verbally abuse a woman like this during a public meeting? I write a column or make an open statement and am not allowed to defend myself. I am then put before a biased ‘integrity commissioner’ who, in my opinion, has no integrity. Councillors should also have no right to remove another member's salary for representing constituents with dissenting voices. The ability to speak freely and represent all viewpoints is a cornerstone of democratic governance. Removing a councillor's salary as a punitive measure undermines this principle, effectively silencing dissent and discouraging the representation of minority or unpopular opinions. This kind of punitive action can create a chilling effect, where councillors fear advocating for their constituents if those views do not align with the majority. I wish Trump Jr. would come to Pickering and give a two-minute speech on democracy and what it takes to be a good political icon. What am I saying? The Mayor would do as he has done in the past with important delegations: snub his nose and instruct staff to shelf it. Look at what is happening with the way the City sends out information. They pass one by-law after another to avoid doing business with this newspaper. Why? The newspaper has been serving all of Durham for the past 29 years. Metroland closed, and the only in-print newspaper is this one. Why has the city not jumped all over this opportunity? You guessed it. Because, like other newspapers, The Central makes the opportunity of writing in the paper available to all elected officials. Since I take advantage of this generous offer to the community, The Central is blackballed. Instead, the City has chosen to publish online. This is a huge mistake, as it is proving to be a failure. Many in the City of Pickering do not use online resources or visit our overly complicated web page. People want to have the news delivered to them, in their hands, to read when they want. I wonder what Trump would think of blackballing people. I am sure he would say something like, “If you think you are on the right track, don’t let anyone derail you.” "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

TORONTO LEGALIZE HARD DRUGS? JUSTINTRUDEAU WANTS TO LEGALIZE HARD DRUGS, DO YOU ?

TORONTO MAYOR CHOW - wants to Legalizing Hard Drugs in Toronto Premier Doug Ford - Is so Against Trudeau on Legalizing Hard Drugs Where Does the NDP Stand? Will They Back Trudeau & Mayor Chow ? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jan. 31, 2023, B.C. became the first Canadian province to legalize hard drugs Life Saver or Failure ??? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The British Columbia government pledged that legalizing hard drugs would help save lives. One year into the three-year pilot project to decriminalize possession of 2.5 grams or less of heroin, fentanyl, cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA, B.C.’s toxic drug deaths have reached record levels with an average of seven people a day dying in 2023. (reported by the Vancouver Sun) It’s prompted B.C. United and B.C. Conservative MLAs to call for decriminalization to be scrapped, citing waning public support, frustration with rampant drug use in parks and public spaces, and an about-face from Oregon three years into their trial. “We’ve had three years of this law that has not delivered on the promise that voters thought they were getting,” Washington County district attorney Kevin Barton told CBS News. Overdose deaths in Oregon have continued to rise since 2020. However, a Hmmm ….. Where’s the Common Sense? Parents everywhere know that if a child gets ill by eating a certain food they can’t fix the illness by giving the child more of that same food. Likewise giving drugs to people who have drug problems does not cure their problem. In both these situations help is needed to teach the user how to live without the illness causing food or drugs. Hmmm … It seems our politicians have no common sense. • October 17, 2018 Justin Trudeau legalized cannabis (also known as weed, pot, mj or marijuana), he said it would save children Did it or did it just make more kids, who wouldn’t normally think of trying it, try it and get hooked on it • Now in 2024 Toronto’s Mayor Olivia Chow requests for an even broader exemption than B.C. had, that would apply even to teenagers and asks Trudeau to support her bid to Legalize hard drugs. DON’T BE PART OF THE SILENT MAJORITY THAT WAKES UP ONLY TO FIND IT’S TOO LATE. ~ AS THE SONG SAYS “CHILDREN ARE OUR FUTURE” MAKE SURE THEY HAVE ONE ~ It’s Time, Write your MP, say enough is enough. To find your MP just ask the internet, enter Find my MP, a screen will come up enter your postal code and you’ll get all the contact info for your MP. Email Mayor Olivia Chow how you feel about legalized drugs ….. Mayor_chow@toronto.ca. STOP THE SILENCE ~ START THE CONVERSATION ~ SPEAK UP FOR WHAT IS RIGHT “OH CANADA, WE STAND ON GUARD FOR THEE”

Why you might be a “Right- Wing Extremist”?

Why you might be a “Right- Wing Extremist”? By Patricia Conlin Many people see that Canada has declined to say the very least. The standard of living has declined, affordability has declined and basic essential services are rapidly eroding under the woke policies of the Ottawa elites. Canada has lost respect internationally under Trudeau and the Liberal/NDP Coalition and harsh laws are being passed to limit free speech like Bill C-11 and Bill-63, The Online Harms Act under the guise of public safety. We see increases in crime, suicide, homelessness and despair in every community. But why? Most people think it is a coincidence or possibly just incompetence but how can any government be that incompetent? Truly something much more sinister is at play when all western nations are experiencing the exact same erosion of rights, freedoms and quality of life under the same draconian government policies. A few years ago, I was minding my own business with a successful consulting firm and a happy life. The rug was harshly pulled out from under my feet when I witnessed bold-face lies during Covid along with the decimation of small businesses under lockdowns (big globalist firms faced no such mandates). As a person of integrity, I could not stay silent and therefore, I was harshly punished. For the crime of simply speaking the truth, I was censored, deplatformed and then called the dreaded “right-wing extremist” slander. This was enough to have a number of my former friends (some of whom, I have known my whole life) quickly remove themselves from my life with no apology or explanation as they simply believed media propaganda. After being deplatformed, my business suffered greatly as well. But despite all the loss, I wouldn’t change anything and I wouldn’t go back in time and stay silent. For what is at play in the world is a coup by powerful globalists who are not interested in thriving economies and communities but rather controlling people and resources with a Digital ID, Pandemic Treaty, CBDC, Social Credit score, land capture and large tax increases to ensure society becomes increasingly demoralized and impoverished-all under the guise of “saving us” from the climate “crisis”. They want us to give up our rights (they have no intention of giving up theirs) and accept a much lower standard of living so they can implement their highly profitable “green agenda” which most of us now know is part of Agenda 2030. Add to that mix, a reckless addition of migrants (a large number seeking refugee status who have no intention of working in Canada) that is putting a massive burden on housing and healthcare and a mental health crisis partly fueled by increasingly radicalized education and policies. But none of those responsible for voting for all these harmful bills and policies say anything about the obvious decline in Canada. Instead, they point fingers at what they call “right-wing extremists” who bring up the obvious harm of the problems they caused. But what does “right-wing extremist” mean really. Given the broad label, most people I speak with would quality as one. Immigrants from India and the Middle East agree with me. Long-term Canadians, parents who see the declining levels of education agree with me. Retired veterans who can’t afford food agree with me. Even many young college and University students are starting to see the obvious and agree with me. Is it extreme to what housing for Canadians first instead of putting refugees in luxury hotels? Is it extreme to want promote peace in the world and return to being an international peacekeeping nation instead of sending funds to foreign countries to escalate conflicts? be supporting all Is it extreme to want Canada to grow economically with a local thriving manufacturing sector (other than EV cars and cricket plants)? Is it extreme to want to tap into our rich and ethically mined resource sector to create jobs and energy independence? Is it extreme to want to protect our farmland and farmers from taxes and control that will bankrupt them and destroy our food security? Is it extreme to question statements from corrupt government officials and media who are controlled by globalist companies that don’t care about Canada? When it comes to right wing, many people now see the deliberate slander behind the label. Mabe right-wing is closer to being on “right side of history”. It takes courage to speak out and tell the truth and nothing good comes from having the majority stay silent to what is growing increasing obvious to many. In many countries, the truth about the harmful Covid and Climate policies is coming to light because brave “right-wing extremists” are speaking out. If you agree with anything I have said here, you too might be considered a “right-wing extremist”!! Isn’t it time for decent citizens all over Canada to reject slanderous labels and instead hold our publicly elected officials accountable. That means showing up at Council meetings, sending letters to MPs and MPPs, speaking about uncomfortable subjects with neighbours and refusing to stay silent. When more people speak out and refuse to be silent by the ridiculous label “right-wing extremist”, we can unite in stopping the deliberately harmful policies from being implemented at a local level. The joy of being on the RIGHT side of history and standing up for Canada is worth it!!

1 billion reasons you voted wrong..

. By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - Oshawa has tracked $1 billion in commercial, industrial and institutional development over the past five years, with major industrial companies bringing their global operations and thousands of new jobs. This was announced at the recent Economic Outlook Breakfast presented by the city’s Economic Development Services Branch with TD Commercial Banking and the Greater Oshawa Chamber of Commerce. TD Deputy Chief Economist, Derek Burleton delivered the 20th annual economic forecast. But, still we the people of Oshawa face 8% tax hike? Maybe it is me. But someone explain this to me. The more the people is it not the more tax collected? If so, then one would think that the City of Oshawa should not have to hike taxes every year. Instead, they would at the least have a tax freeze. Maybe we should consult with the TD Deputy Chief Economist, Derek Burleton. He can possibly explain it to the Mayor and his merry men. Sure more people more resources needed to accommodate. But 5 billion!!! That is not an extra five hundred bucks. What benefit has the average taxpayer gained? More traffic, more crime. House values compromised. All this development and no planning. Who is going to pay for additional policing? Since DRPS is a regional service. But wait. The Region sits on 2 Billion surplus. Am I of such low intellect that I do not question tax hikes... Something is wrong with this picture. Can you spot Waldo? I can... and you keep electing them in. We have politicians that lack the intellectual capability to make multi million dollar decisions. So, the rely on staff. Staff that does not really give a dam other than to keep their job and every year ask for an increase. There is no explanation to the poor management of the city. The Mayor is the CEO. He should take the responsibility to improve the quality of life for all citizens. He should not depend on what staff tells him to do. He should be using staff to better the life of all citizens across Oshawa. This is why we have the homeless at a all time high. Drugs widely available downtown, prostitution run wild. Downtown business opening and closing right left and center. People, much like we require a doctor to have a medial license. Should we not require at the least 5 year business experience from either councilor Mayoral candidates. 5Billion and they dare tax increase of 8%. Shameful.

the TAX CODE...

By Dale Jodoin Canada's tax code has expanded significantly over the years, reflecting the increasing complexity of tax legislation. When the Liberal Party took office in 2015, the Income Tax Act already contained approximately 1,029,042 words, translating to around 1,412 pages (Fraser Institute). Since then, additional tax measures and provisions have likely increased the total number of pages. The exact number of new pages added each year isn't always reported, but it's evident that the tax code continues to grow, adding to the administrative burden on taxpayers and tax officials alike. The Impact of a Complex Tax System The expanding tax code disproportionately impacts small businesses and individual taxpayers. While larger corporations have the resources to hire tax professionals to navigate complex regulations, smaller entities and individuals often struggle. This complexity can lead to inadvertent non-compliance and increased costs associated with tax preparation. The result is a system that can feel unfair to "the little guy," where a simpler, more transparent tax system might be more equitable. The Underground Economy in the Digital Age As the tax system becomes more complex, some individuals and businesses turn to the underground economy to avoid taxes. The underground economy involves economic activities that are not reported to the government and, therefore, not taxed. Traditionally, this included cash-only businesses, unreported income from side jobs, and barter transactions. However, with technological advancements, the scope of the underground economy has evolved significantly. Digital Underground Economy Activities Freelance Work on International Platforms: Many individuals offer freelance services on international platforms such as Upwork, Fiverr, and Freelancer. These platforms enable users to connect with clients worldwide, often resulting in income that is not reported to local tax authorities. For example, a graphic designer in Canada might find clients in the U.S. or Europe, get paid through PayPal or similar services, and not report this income. E-commerce Sales: Small businesses and individuals selling goods on platforms like eBay, Etsy, or Amazon Marketplace can easily operate below the radar. While these platforms do provide some income reporting to tax authorities, smaller sellers often underreport earnings or conduct transactions through personal accounts to avoid scrutiny. Digital Content Creation: Content creators on YouTube, Twitch, or other streaming platforms can earn significant income from ad revenue, donations, and sponsorships. These earnings, especially if paid through international platforms, can be difficult to track and are often underreported. Cryptocurrency Transactions: The rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin has provided a new avenue for conducting transactions anonymously. Cryptocurrency earnings and transactions can be challenging for tax authorities to trace, enabling users to operate within a shadow economy. Online Tutoring and Coaching: Many educators and coaches offer services through platforms like Zoom or Skype, receiving payments via PayPal or direct bank transfers. These transactions can easily go unreported, especially when dealing with international clients. Virtual Assistants: Businesses often hire virtual assistants from other countries to handle tasks ranging from customer service to social media management. Payments for these services, often made through international channels, are frequently unreported. Online Gaming and Betting: Income from online gaming, including e-sports, and betting websites often goes unreported. Winnings from international betting sites or gaming platforms can be transferred through digital wallets, making it difficult for tax authorities to track. The Role of Technology in the Underground Economy Technology has made it easier for individuals and businesses to engage in the underground economy. Online payment systems, digital currencies, and global marketplaces provide anonymity and reduce the likelihood of detection by tax authorities. This growing trend raises concerns about tax evasion and the ability of governments to collect revenue effectively. Government Surveillance and Tax Compliance As governments recognize the challenges posed by the underground economy, there is an increasing push towards surveillance and data collection. Efforts to monitor financial transactions, digital payments, and online activities are intensifying. For instance, tax authorities might use data analytics to identify discrepancies between reported income and lifestyle indicators (e.g., property ownership, luxury goods purchases). The Need for a Fair Tax System While technological advancements have enabled more sophisticated means of tax evasion, they also highlight the need for a fair and simple tax system. A system that reduces complexity and ensures that tax burdens are equitably shared is essential. Simplifying the tax code, improving compliance through better education and support, and leveraging technology to streamline tax reporting could help address the challenges posed by the underground economy. The underground economy continues to thrive in the digital age, driven by technological advancements and the increasing complexity of tax systems. To ensure a fair tax system that does not unduly burden individuals and small businesses, there is a need for simplification and modernization. Governments must balance the use of surveillance and data collection with the rights of citizens to privacy and the need for a transparent, equitable tax system.

A Candidate Being Overqualified is a Legitimate Concern

By Nick Kossovan A fundamental principle of humanity—innate freedom—is that everyone has a right to pursue their own self-interests, which inherently lends itself to liberal democracy and capitalism. In other words, you and I are free, within the boundaries of laws established by politicians who were voted in because voters believed they'd best serve their self-interests to make life choices we believe are in our best interests. You and I have the right to pursue our self-interests as long as our pursuits do not interfere with the interests of others. Ideally, harmony and easy-flowing relationships are established when self-interests support and complement each other. We also need to understand that if we want our self-interests respected, we need to respect the self-interests of others. Let's apply this fundamental principle of humanity to the job market. Employers have their self-interests, the obvious being to run and maintain their business profitably, and job seekers have their self-interests, the obvious being to have an income. Job seekers' self-interests often conflict with those of employers, whose self-interests trump theirs since they create the jobs (read: paycheques). Therefore, job seekers are always bubbling with emotion. Consider this: how often do you make a life choice that isn't driven by your self-interest? Reflecting on this provides valuable insights into the role of self-interest in our decision-making processes, as well as that of employers. As you choose what's in your best interests, employers choose what's in the best interests of their business. Job seekers like to point out all the supposed unfairness—touchpoints that don't serve their self-interest—they can find throughout an employer's hiring process, which the employer designed with their business's interests in mind. A common complaint among job seekers is not being hired because they are supposedly "overqualified." When the hiring process is viewed from the employer's right to pursue their self-interests, you understand that a candidate being overqualified isn't a bad thing; it's, however, a risky thing for several reasons: · They're likely to become bored and become a flight risk. (Overqualified = too temporary. Employers don't want to hire, train, and then lose their new hire.) · An insubordination risk. (Often, an employer doesn't want a go-getter; they just want someone reliable to plug in and do the job without making noise about advancing their career.) · Will want to make changes, causing distractions. · Will act as a know-it-all. · Will expect to be paid more. All these, while not absolute, are valid concerns. Additionally, when you apply to a job posting, you're entering a competition. Considering all the tangible and intangible factors that go into a hiring decision, being overqualified for a position doesn't necessarily make you the best candidate. Contrary to beliefs designed to create excuses, overqualified candidates aren't seen as someone who'll be gunning for the boss's job, nor is "overqualified" code for "too old." Whether fair or not, a candidate's qualifications level contributes to a hiring manager's evaluation of whether they'll be a "fit," which, not surprisingly, many job seekers label as discrimination. Would you hire a 5-star chef to flip hamburgers at your diner? (Yes, an exaggeration, but the point is made.) Elimination is integral to any hiring process; therefore, discrimination is inevitable. When receiving hundreds of applications for one position, an employer has no choice but to look for reasons to eliminate candidates to whittle down to the few who are phone and face-to-face interview-worthy. This is when the real "elimination discrimination" begins. As humans, hiring managers naturally focus on "what they like" or "who'll be a good fit." Many hiring managers, especially those at executive levels, evaluate candidates based on how they feel they'll integrate with their team or can see themselves liking the candidate socially; therefore, if you're likeable, your interviewer will probably overlook your being overqualified. Being likable trumps your skills and experience; thus, prioritize being likable over your skills and experience. Whenever you find yourself in an interview knowing you're overqualified for the job, an indication that the employer is interested in hearing your career story and why you're interested in the job, you need to address the elephant in the room ASAP. Addressing your interviewer's concerns (e.g., age, commute time, overqualification) before they bring it up is a savvy job search strategy rarely utilized. When your interviewer raises their concerns, you're put on the defensive. You want to be on the offensive. Therefore, prepare a "don't worry about" script that you can use after exchanging pleasantries. "If it's okay with you before we begin, I'd like to address something you might be wondering about, my [qualifications, experience]. Although I have X years of experience and have held more senior roles, I'm looking to scale back so I can better focus on delivering my best work while also [caring for an aging parent / spending time with my family]." Being upfront in addressing your interviewer's concern(s), which I assure you they'll very much appreciate, demonstrates you have the emotional intelligence to understand and respect the employer's possible concerns, which will help you establish a positive relationship with your interviewer, thus increasing your odds of being hired. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Life Is A Drag - No Really

By Rosaldo Russo Allow me to begin this column by thanking the Oshawa/Central newspaper for allowing me the opportunity and access to the press. Not to many if any allow an average person like me to tell the world what I see and think. In my opinion. The Editor/Publisher is a real upstanding type of guy. He shoots from the hip and hold traditional core values. My name is Rosaldo Russo. I came to this great country to make a better life for myself and my family. I thank Canada for everything it has allowed me to do and earn. I worked construction all my life. I know the value of hard work and honesty. I remember as a boy my father always telling me to work hard and buy land. So I did. I remember days when I did not have enough to eat. I go to work... but I did not wait for hand outs. I rounded up my pride my skill and my determination to succeed and went to work. In those days the only benefits we received was the fact we were employed. Before retiring I was the owner and operator of local material supply company that allowed me to retired without worry. Now that I have time to enjoy life. I look around me and have some concern for future generations. I see that the world is finished. I remember the days when I went to school. We had the outmost respect for our educators. No matter the situation. We made sure that we showed respect. I remember having this one teacher. She was a bit of a dish if you know what I mean. Real short skirts and blouses that would make a grown man weep. She was beautiful. But even thought she was beautiful. She had self respect, dignity and pride in knowing she was beautiful and did not have any scruples in accessorizing her god given beauty. Everyone treated her with respect and kindness. Some of the women, obviously would talk behind her back. That was expected. I remember her as if it was yesterday. We would not dare be smart ass or make rude comments. What happened to those days. Women were women. Men were men and we all had respect for one another. The other day my grand child came up tome and said. Grandpa, you hear what they are doing at school? I said, NO - What. She said. They are having men come in dressed as women and read us books. I said. WHAAATTT. Where are we going here. In today's world you make a comment to a woman that she is beautiful and you get charged with sexual harassment. A woman much like my old teacher walks in a school and she gets called all kind of name and shamed for her natural beauty. Now where did we loose our ability to be decent? A man dressed up as a woman in my book is a mental illness. To have these guys read books to little children is wrong. Why not have women like my teacher sit there and read the kids books? Why because it be morally wrong for the woman to be exposing her beauty to children. She would have better sense to compromise the innocence of children. My teacher would have never even consider doing something in order to support some sexual agenda. That is plain wrong. No matter how you look at it. Don't you agree?

Beyond Her Grasp

from Wayne & Tamara I am a woman, 42, who three years ago married a wonderful man who will be 48 on his next birthday. I love him very, very much. The only problem is our sex life is horrible. Pretty much nonexistent. I can safely say we have had sex maybe 20 times in our six year relationship. When I've tried numerous times to talk to him, he gets defensive and says, "There's nothing wrong with me." He also says, if I want to have sex, I should just say so. But when I make advances, he pushes me away thinking I am playing with him. Then he leaves the room. Of course I get frustrated, out of the mood, and give up. I love my husband so much I don't make a big deal of it, although I know this is not normal or healthy. I can't get him to go to counseling or discuss this. I am at my sexual peak, and I am tired of dreaming of sex with other men. I want our relationship to work, but I just don't know how much longer I can go on like this. Claire Claire, you can work on planting a garden, you can work on your weight loss, you can work on your reading speed. But you cannot work on someone else's problem, unless they are willing, and failure is guaranteed when they tell you they do not have a problem. Thoreau said, "It takes two to speak the truth--one to speak and another to hear." Your husband will not hear or discuss reality, the reality of the situation as you see it. You married him knowing he had this problem. Marriage does not cure a problem, it makes you a party to it for a while. Is this the hard lesson you had to learn? That you cannot marry a man with a serious problem and expect to fix it. Wayne & Tamara Calling Her Bluff I've been with my boyfriend for four years, and he is going through the longest divorce known to man. His soon-to-be ex knows of me and told him she is insanely jealous. She makes my life complete hell by emailing him sexual innuendoes, asking him for expensive gifts, and calling him an average of 12 times a day. I told him to cut the cord. If he wants to be with me, he has to protect me, be true to me, and make me feel secure in this relationship. We even tried counseling a few years back, and then he cheated on me with her. Many times I told him to get on with this divorce or I would be gone, but it doesn't seem to scare him anymore. How do I get my point across to this man, and do I have any grounds to tell this woman to leave him alone and just tend to her children? Paige Paige, the one thing which may set you free is to look on this situation from a different point of view. He didn't cheat on you with her. She's his wife. He's cheating on her with you. You describe her as his soon-to-be ex, but "soon-to-be ex" is a term more likely to describe your future, not hers. You threaten and threaten to leave, and you never do. Bluffing in poker may be good strategy, but bluffing in life is weak. Once your bluff is called, you've lost all power and all credibility. And counseling? Think about how funny that is. You went for relationship counseling with a man in a marriage to another woman. Why do you keep plodding forward? Because you want to be married. There is nothing wrong with that. But you cannot marry someone who is already married. There is a simple solution. Don't give up wanting to be married, just give up married men. Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

Weight and Diet Strain Knees and Hips

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford How many thousands of knee and hip replacements, and how much pain, could be avoided by the right diet? Arthritis has been called the chronic-care challenge of the 21st century. It is no small problem in economic terms either. A few months ago, The Lancet, a peer-reviewed medical journal, published startling statistics. Over the last 30 years, the global incidence of osteoarthritis has risen by132% to 595 million people. There is no sign of the disease slowing down and there’s no cure. What does this mean? For public healthcare systems like Canada’s, it means ever more costs to the taxbase for higher and higher numbers of expensive knee and hip replacements. Osteoarthritis is the “wear and tear” form of arthritis. Like aging car brakes that wear down with use, human joints begin to grate and scrape with age. It’s a fact that heavier vehicles need especially careful maintenance. People carrying excess weight should shed it to avoid unnecessary wear. But arthritis is caused by more than just heavy use and aging. Inadequate nutrition also sets the stage for arthritis. The famous Framingham Health Study followed thousands of people for 40 years assessing risk factors for osteoarthritis. The study showed that people with osteoarthritis who consumed over 9,000 international units of beta-carotene a day had decreased progression of this disease and were less likely to suffer from knee pain later in life. A Finnish study showed that people with low levels of beta-carotene were eight times more likely to develop rheumatoid arthritis as they aged. Beta-carotene is present in deep-coloured vegetables and fruits. The same Framingham study underscored the importance of vitamin D. People with arthritic knees consuming less than 350 units developed arthritis at higher rates than those who took over 400 units a day. There’s good reason why. Vitamin D is needed for the absorption of calcium. The typical dietary source of vitamin D is milk, one of nature’s nearly perfect foods. But few people drink enough milk daily. The Framingham study uncovered another vital fact, that our joints need oil. But not all the oils we eat are equal. Our food contains different types of fatty acids. The good omega-3 fatty acids fight inflammation; the bad omega-6 fatty acids trigger inflammation. Obviously, it’s better to have more of the good oils than the bad ones. But North Americans eat 10 times more omega-6 than omega-3, and this sad reality triggers not only arthritis, but also heart disease. Research shows that death from heart attack may be the result of a combination of both clogged and inflamed coronary arteries. The logical solution is to change our diet. Increase consumption of fruits and vegetables to obtain healthy vitamins. One carrot contains 20,000 international units of beat-carotene and a sweet potato with skin has 25,000 IU. Drink three glasses of milk daily or get the equivalent through supplementation. Excellent sources of omega-3 are salmon, halibut and sardines. Omega-3 is also found in walnuts, beans, tofu, flaxseed oil, pecans and green leafy vegetables. A high-quality supplement like Certified Natural’s Omega-3X is recommended since few people eat enough of the dietary sources. To avoid omega-6 oils reduce processed, frozen and boxed foods. Skip the crackers, cookies and most desserts. Buy the right cooking oils. Omega-6 is present in corn, sunflower and cottonseed oil. Olive, soybean and canola cooking oils contain omega-3. Don’t neglect weight control. The pressure on your knees going upstairs is 2.5 times your body weight. Going downstairs, it is 3.5 times. Squatting amounts to 8 times the pressure. Weight reduction goes far to increasing the benefits of sound nutrition in preventing osteoarthritis. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones