When In The Course…

When In The Course… from Wayne & Tamara I was 20 when I married a wonderful guy who is 12 years older than me. He was so mature I thought he must be the wisest man in the world. There was no need for me to study or follow a career because he would be a good provider. All I had to be was his pretty wife and give him children. Almost 15 years later I am left with two wonderful children and so much bitterness in my heart I sometimes feel life is not worth living. Over the last nine years he has been unemployed for months and changed jobs seven times. On his last job he was drinking most of the time and fell into depressions and aggressions until it came to a stage where the children and I were afraid of him. All this time I was the provider of the family and worked very hard in unhappy circumstances just to keep the family alive. I finally realized I had to do something for the sake of my children and myself. I asked my husband for a divorce. He refused. Months later I made another attempt for a separation. I think he realized I meant it, and somehow he found a wonderful job within two weeks. His personality changed again. He stopped drinking and in general is nice to me and the children. My problem is I do not know how to change my feelings. I no longer respect him. I am almost willing to say I've started to hate him. Although he is nice at the moment, I cannot bring myself to trust or love him again. I tell myself for the sake of the children I should stay with him, but I am battling even to be nice to him. Whatever he does annoys me. I wish he would just find another girlfriend and disappear out of our lives. He says he isn't willing to go to counseling since he is not the one with the problem. Can time heal my unhappiness? Barbara Barbara, before they declared their independence, the American colonies were generous in supporting the British crown. Of their own volition the colonies sent more revenue than the mother country required. Despite this the king and parliament imposed one burdensome tax after another on the colonies. Perhaps the most infuriating of these was the 1765 Stamp Act, which imposed a tax on every scrap of paper of record. Even playing cards and dice were taxed. These taxes were imposed not for the benefit of the colonies, but "for improving the revenue of the kingdom." The result was that every act of the British crown became viewed with wariness, suspicion and mistrust. A few years later, when the East India Company was stuck with thousands of tons of unsold tea, laws were passed in England to allow the sale of cheap tea to the American colonies. Although parliament bypassed American distributors, this action would have resulted in cheaper tea and benefited most people in America. But the colonists would have none of it. In New York and Philadelphia ships carrying tea were turned back to England. In Charleston tea rotted on the docks. And in Boston people staged the famous Boston Tea Party. Dozens of men disguised as Mohawk Indians dumped a shipload of Darjeeling tea into the harbor. There comes a time when it is too late to change the course of human events, and then a revolution which need not have occurred, does occur. Usually when we get a letter like yours, it is written by a man. The writer begins by admitting he neglected and mistreated his wife for years, and then explains he has changed. The writer concludes by saying his wife will have none of it. Why? Because like the American colonists, she has had enough. She has issued her own declaration of independence. Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

A Hot Problem in the City

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford Do you know the new problem that is starting to kill some people? It’s not a viral disease, but it’s spreading in very hot climates. Caring pet owners protect their dogs from it, but some people are not taking the same precautions. What’s the trouble? It’s third-degree burns that result from contact with hot pavement. Our sidewalks are becoming deadly! Climate change is creating environmental extremes. Floods for some. Fires for others. And in some cities, there are growing numbers of people suffering severe burns from contact with excessively hot outdoor surfaces. The statistics show that not only are more such burns occurring each year, but more people are dying from very large and deep burns caused by prolonged contact with hot sidewalk pavement. The New York Times reported on a case in Las Vegas. A man, having had a few too many drinks at his favourite bar, passed out on a sidewalk during the day as temperatures rose to 109ºF. He woke up in hospital with severe burns, and not only to his skin. He suffered third-degree burns that scorched deep into the underlying muscle and bone. Treatment for his burns required several weeks in hospital and multiple operations to salvage damaged tissue. For a few drinks, it was a huge price to pay. There are other examples where alcohol wasn’t a factor. One elderly man tripped and fell on stones in his own backyard. He badly scorched his hands, forearms, and legs in trying to get himself up. Another person had the same problem, not due to age but to excessive weight. The pavement was so hot that summertime clothing did little to alleviate the scorching intense heat. Cries for help brought bystanders, but the damaged was done. This person also received dangerous burns requiring hospitalization, surgeries, and a very painful process of recovery. Children as also falling victim. For example, toddlers don’t realize how hot door handles can get or even car seats in the sun, and they don’t have well-developed withdrawal reflexes. In the blink of an eye, babies can crawl from cool grass or safe playground surfaces onto hot pavement, or from a beach towel onto blistering hot sand. They may not cry until after a damaging burn occurs. People with diabetes comprise another category of victims. Their damaged nerves and poor circulation, especially in their feet, increase the risk of burns from walking barefoot on hot concrete and not feeling pain. Amputation is the only possible treatment for ten per cent of diabetics who burn their feet. How many people fail to think of their pet’s paws on hot asphalt. Do this simple test. If you can’t hold the back of your hand for seven seconds on the sidewalk, then it’s too hot for your dog. We will all need to be more careful about burns from hot pavement. But don’t forget about where burns remain most common and preventable. That’s in the kitchen. Use your common sense, as nearly everyone can identify the risks. Young children should not be near the stove. Older people need to make adjustments when cooking. Among seniors, burns are the second leading injury at home after falls. So don’t attempt to carry pots and hot dishes that are too heavy to handle safely. And don’t wear loose clothing that can catch fire, especially at a gas-burning stove. What can be done about that scorching pavement? Let’s start by not building more and more of it. Cities and subdivisions will continue to expand. But we need to use better design with more greenery, and a lot less concrete and asphalt. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

“EXPOSED” - MUNICIPAL Councils Are Working Against Constituents S-O-S, S-O-S - PEOPLE OF ONTARIO PAY ATTENTION TO THIS ALERT

EXPOSED - YOUR MUNICIPAL MAYORS & COUNCILLORS ACROSS ONTARIO ARE PLOTTING TO DEPRIVE YOU, THE PEOPLE OF YOUR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS. YES, the Municipal Councils, the people you elected, are working against you, the public. They want the right to have a council member fired from council, they also want the right to have that person who you elected, banned from running in the next election, why? So you the people can’t vote that person back in. In other words, municipal councils want the right to deny you the public your democratic right to who you can vote for. This is the First Step in Killing Democracy. Ontario Municipal Councils have been writing the AMO (association of municipalities of Ontario) which is an elected board consisting of members from the different municipalities of Ontario. The Municipal Councils are begging the AMO to have Premier Doug Ford amend Bill 5, re the ‘Municipal Act 2001’ to allow Municipal Councils to fire a colleague (one of your elected members), and to do it by having the Integrity Commissioner be the one to say a council member should be fired there by absolving the council of being the ones doing the firing. The council will tell you the public that they didn’t fire your elected member. Just another way of hiding by covering the eyes of the public with half truths. The real question is, why would a council want or need to fire an elected colleague? Crimes, sexual harassment, harassment & abuse etc all have ways to be dealt with, example, Human Rights, Criminal Courts etc. Could it be that the fellow elected members, who does not follow the council’s agenda, who does not rubber stamp things but actually works in favour of the people is showing up the rest of the council and exposing what’s happening? I have to wonder? Who are these council members that are running your municipality, who are making decisions that affect your life, your city, town or community,? Who are theses councils who want the right to fire a colleague, an elected member? Do these municipal councils know anything about democracy? If they do not know the difference between a hired employee (staff) by a business -vs- a person elected by the people, then should they really be running your municipality? PEOPLE IT’S TIME, STAND & SPEAK UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS, KEEP DEMOCRACY ALIVE Email Premier Doug Ford at both ….. premier@ontario.ca and correspondence.premier.gov.on.ca Email AMO, Pres Colin Best at ….. amopresident@amo.on.ca Email the city clerk of your municipality (call your council office and get the clerks email and tell the clerk to copy every member of council with your email.) Write the following to the Premier, the AMO and your Municipal Council, let them know how you feel. 1. How dare municipal councils ask for this right to fire an elected person. Only we, the public (voters) have the right to fire an elected member and we will do this in the next election by using our democratic right to vote for our choice. 2. Tell them you are watching and that their voting and decisions will have a direct way on how you vote in any upcoming elections. Citizens of Ontario and Canada, Your “Silence Solves Nothing” It’s Time for Action, to Stand Up For Your Rights Before They Are Gone

Beware the fraudsters!

By Thersa Grant/Real Estate Columnist We’ve all heard the heart wrenching stories of people who’ve been duped out of several hundred or a few thousand dollars by unscrupulous fraudsters advertising properties for rent that they do not own. How does one protect themselves so that they do not fall victim to such a scam? It can be difficult, as these fraudsters have become somewhat advanced over the years, in terms of how they advertise. With the introduction of artificial intelligence it will only get more difficult to discern fact from fiction. There are generally two types of rental fraud out there. The first is someone renting a unit briefly and advertising it as a long term rental, while pretending to be the Landlord. In this situation, the perpetrator will take first and last month’s rent from someone, along with a key deposit of a few hundred dollars, a damage deposit, in some cases an upcharge for parking or other things. This can total several thousand dollars. The second and perhaps more easily detectable is the situation whereby a property is advertised, it looks amazing and is being offered at a ridiculously low rent. When someone contacts the supposed owner of this property, they are told that the owners, often a couple, are on a mission with their church and out of the country currently. In some cases, they are told that the supposed owners have had some sort of family emergency and are out of the country. They are told stories that would make the average person think they are dealing with a kind, generous, compassionate person. When in reality they are dealing with the exact opposite. In this scenario, the entire transaction takes place online. Money is sent to the fictious owner of the property in advance. The would-be tenants are shown beautiful pictures of what they will be renting, told a story of how they will be helping the owners, just by living there and taking care of this property for them while they are out of the country. They are told that the keys will be ready for them on moving day. There is usually a family member of caretaker going to drop off the keys, but they cannot get there at the moment as they live out of town. They are led to believe that they are part of some amazing win- win situation. These fraudsters prey on people. They take advantage of people’s sense of hope. Everyone likes a bargain. Everyone is looking the for the best deal they can get. Everyone needs a home. We’ve all heard the saying, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. That is the truth. However, people will always hope against hope that maybe, just this once, this is the real deal. It usually never is. There are a few things you can do to protect yourself. First of all, never ever send money in advance of viewing a property in person. Google the address of the place for rent. Google the name of the person calling themselves the Landlord. Although it may seem unusual or even uncomfortable, ask the person purporting to be the Landlord for some kind of identification. Landlords are acutely aware of the degree of fraud taking place in the rental market today. Most would not be offended or insulted by making such a request. If you are on site, look around and ask questions. Landlords are happy to answer your questions because they are looking for the right tenants. Scam artists don’t like questions, they will try to rush you, and make you feel as though if you don’t act now, you may lose out on this amazing property. They will often say that you need to act fast because there are several people wanting this space. Keep in mind, great spaces at reasonable prices don’t need to be forced or pushed on people. If you are feeling pressured in any way, let that speak volumes. Heed your inner voice and remove yourself from the situation, with your money still in your bank account. If you find yourself caught up in a fraudulent rental scam, contact your local authorities to report the incident. Questions? Story ideas? You may reach me at: email newspaper@ocentral.com

Three Rules For a Hollywood-Ending Job Search

By Nick Kossovan You can increase your chances of a "Hollywood ending," to your job search, however, you can't guarantee it. Some years back, a late afternoon on New Year's Eve. My phone rang as I walked along the newly snow-plowed sidewalk to my home. After three months of back-and-forth with a financial service provider, my to-be boss was calling me to tell me I got the job. What a way to end 2013! Then there was the time I was given the "you're no longer a fit" speech, which I knew was coming. (TIP: Learn to read the room.) As I was packing, a company I'd been interviewing with—as I said, I knew what was coming—called, hiring me to manage their customer service department. Within 10 minutes, I'd call my wife to tell her I had lost my job and then call her back to tell her I got a new one. Always be reading the room. Always be looking. I've had several Hollywood-ending job searches, not quite "a dream job offer, champagne celebration, and living happily ever after," but very close. Based on my experience, a "Hollywood-ending" job search can be moderately orchestrated, but only to a certain extent, the main influencing factors being: Establishing yourself as a Subject Matter Expert (SME) through a compelling personal brand, LinkedIn profile, resume, cover letter, and digital footprint. Actively networking and building relationships. Interviewing skillfully and leaving an impression that makes your interviewer say, "We need [your name]!" Negotiating an attractive compensation package. Feeling a genuine sense of excitement about your new job. Fade out "The End" Role credits However, external factors such as economic conditions, employer priorities, and ubiquitous "hiring manager's preferences" influence the aforementioned influencing factors. It would be naive to believe getting a job offer doesn't involve some element of luck. Ultimately, you can increase your chances of a "Hollywood ending," but you can't fully orchestrate or guarantee it. All you can do is put in the work, remain flexible, and be open to unexpected opportunities. While your job search should be characterized by positivity and persistence, remember that a degree of luck plays a role in your job search, as it does throughout your life. Share I attribute my experiencing several Hollywood-ending job searches to having conducted my job searches by adhering to the following rules: Think for yourself. The Internet, especially LinkedIn, is populated by self-proclaimed job search experts—talking heads—who are willing to take your money for information you can find for free. I've yet to come across a "job search expert" or "career coach" who doesn't offer rehashed cookie-cutter advice. Following the same advice as other job seekers will not differentiate you in today's hyper-competitive job market. Thinking for yourself, a practice that is decreasing—following and looking for shortcuts are easier—will. Because I learn by doing, I advocate DIY job searching. In addition to saving money, DIY job searching is how you learn and develop job searching skills, which, as layoffs have become the norm, is a crucial career management skill. I attribute much of my job search and career success to thinking critically—evaluating the pros and cons against my needs and wants—avoiding groupthink, exploring unconventional paths, charting my job search course and most importantly, trusting my instincts. Nobody knows me better than me. Rocky, Whiplash, Ford v Ferrari, The Founder, and Steve Jobs are just a fraction of the many Hollywood movies where the protagonist walks their own path while thinking for themselves and ends up achieving their end goal(s). Know what you can and can't control. A recipe for frustration: Trying to control what isn't yours to control. Long ago, I accepted that employers own their businesses and, therefore, own their hiring process. Instead of obsessing over (read: wasting time and energy) how employers hire, which many job seekers do, I shrug my shoulders and say to myself, "If that's how they want to run their business, then so be it," and move on. Accepting that you can't control how employers hire will improve your frame of mind. Acknowledge your limitations. "A man's got to know his limitations." - Inspector Harry Callahan (Clint Eastwood) in Magnum Force. Another reason many job seekers are frustrated is that they aren't acknowledging their limitations (e.g., skills gaps, lack of experience). Life's harshest truism is that none of us are equal biologically, genetically and at an intelligence level. Biology is the root reason why “life isn't fair." Therefore, let go of the belief life should be played on an even playing field. At the onset of my career, I was frustrating myself by trying to compete against those with inborn aptitude or affinity—I call them naturals—for the jobs I was aiming for. It wasn't until I acknowledged and accepted my limitations and my naturals that my job search results improved, and my career started heading in the right direction. A sense of self-awareness, combined with critical thinking, has given me the smarts to target roles and employers suited to my capabilities and present myself authentically and confidently; after all, I'm in my wheelhouse. Take it from me, humility and honesty lead to better job search results and sometimes to a "happy ending" worthy of the silver screen. ________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

My friends neighbours, and fellow citizens

By Lisa Robinson My friends, neighbours, and fellow citizens, We stand at a pivotal moment in our community’s history. It is a moment where we must decide who we are, what we stand for, and how we will shape the future for ourselves and generations to come. For too long, politics has been dominated by those who serve themselves before serving the people. We’ve seen corruption seep into the very fabric of our institutions, leaving too many of us feeling powerless, unheard, and disillusioned. The voices of the people, the everyday hard-working citizens who make our community thrive, have too often been drowned out by the noise of self-interest and backroom deals. But today, I stand before you to say: Enough is enough. We deserve better. We deserve leaders who are willing to fight for the common good, who are guided by common sense, and who understand the struggles and hopes of the common people. I am here not just as a politician but as one of you—a member of this community who knows what it’s like to worry about paying the bills, finding a safe place for our children to play, and making sure there’s enough food on the table. I know the frustration of seeing our tax dollars wasted on projects that benefit the few while our schools, hospitals, and public services suffer. But I also know the strength and resilience of this community. I’ve seen it in our neighbours helping neighbours, in our local businesses lifting each other up, and in the voices that refuse to be silenced in the face of injustice. And no matter our differences, we are united under one banner—the Canadian flag. A flag that represents the values we hold dear: fairness, equality, and justice for all. It reminds us that we are stronger together, bound by a shared commitment to build a brighter future for every Canadian. I believe in a politics that puts people first—where the needs of our families, our workers, and our seniors take precedence over the interests of the powerful. I believe in transparency, accountability, and integrity. And I believe that together, we can build a government that truly serves the people. But I can’t do it alone. I need your help. Together, we must stand up against the corruption that has taken root in our political system. We must demand that our leaders act with honesty and fairness. We must hold them accountable when they fail us, and we must work tirelessly to ensure that our government reflects the values of our community. I promise you this: I will always stand up for what is right, even when it’s difficult. I will listen to your concerns and make sure your voices are heard. I will fight for a future where our children can grow up in a world that is fairer, more just, and filled with opportunity. This is our moment. This is our fight. Let’s stand together, united in our determination to bring about real change. Let’s reject the politics of division, corruption, and cynicism. Let’s build a future where we can all thrive, proud to be Canadians, and proud to stand together beneath the red and white of our flag. And when future generations look back on this time, let them say that we were the ones who stood up, who spoke out, and who made a difference. Let them say that we were the ones who fought for a better, fairer, and more just world. Thank you. Thank you for your trust, your support, and your belief in the power of the people. Together, we will create the future we all deserve—united as Canadians, and as a community God Bless "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

Life Is A Beach

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - How times have changed. I remember as a kid going to the beach and looking for the many flags posted along the coast line. Green meant low surf, yellow medium surf, red meant do not go in. The biggest danger was that if you swam during a red flag that there was a good chance you get pulled out to ocean. For those wondering. I was born in Uruguay, South America. A place where clouds are as rare as ugly women. The beach was a great place to sit around and sun tan. Take a swim in the salty ocean water. Now don’t get me wrong. On the occasion they would post double red flags... this was normally due to flooding up the Rio De LaPlata that connected to the Amazon, hundreds of miles to the north in Brazil. When it would flood. The access water would run off into the Oshawa with severe force. At times taking all kinds of animals with it. Including snakes and all kind of God’s creatures. Most would die once they hit the salt water... As a journalist, I sit here in Canada and read all the beach closings. My first thoughts, snakes, caimans (alligators)... I remember the red flags warning of high surf and danger of being taken out to the ocean. No, instead. Here in Canada, we have to worry about catching something from the so called fresh water lake. We have to worry about needles, cigarette buts and as reported in Wassaga beach human excrement buried in the not so white sand. Now, don’t get me wrong. I am a proud Canadian. I am not complaining about Canada. I am complaining at the deterioration of the quality of our water. Red flag or beach closure here could technically mean you will catch some sort fungal infection. Let’s look beyond the algae, the bio-hazard material in our so called pure fresh water lakes... This is the same water we drink. This is the same water we bathe. This is the same water we pee and poo in. This is the same water that when you die they drain your blood into. Surely, they purify it.... The question in my mind. How long, how many times can you purify waste water before it you are just purifying waste. Drinking waste, bathing in waste? Tricky question. Scientist would argue... you can do that forever... Well, I am hard press to believe that. Think about it. The liquid may be the same. The composition similar. But much like in the human DNA. Does exposure over time not change it’s fundamental building blocks. We are humans. We are composed of the same compound with the DNA coding that makes who we are. Then let’s ask this question. If we are what we were. They why do we have so many different weakness in our immune system. In our ability to fight off disease? Society you say? I say malarkey.

Canada's defence capabilities in crisis in this uncertain world.

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East I have discussed some problems related to National Defence in the past, but I cannot resist doing so again.This time I'm addressing the continued lack of interest the Canadian political establishmenthas shown in this crucial topic. As aMember of Parliament for four and a half years who served on Parliament's National Defence Committee,I feel that National Defence issues were treated superficially and with a lack of genuine interest. There are signs everywhere that the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) are in deep crisis. The foremost is our Forces' lack of military capability and capacity compared to Canada's close allies. The Canadian Armed Forces have been neglected for decadesthrough poor recruiting, lack of personnel, and the inadequate supply of suitable and modern equipment. Today Canada is only able to contribute token units to continental defence, not to mention any foreign contingency. A key part of the capability challenge involves an antiquated, inefficient and costly procurement system that often delivers equipment years late, at inordinate cost;equipment that is less effective than what is available on the market. Furthermore, the military's capabilities and capacity are hampered by a dire personnel situation within the CAF. Many key positions are at half of the authorized staffing and populated with inefficient and poorly qualified public servants. Finally, there are the issues surrounding the utilization of the military, including over-deployment and ineffective and/or counterproductive uses which illustrate a highly inefficient army leadership unable to stand up to undue political pressure. It is also sad to see the deflection of huge monetary resources to costly and adventurous projects overseas instead of the fortification and modernization of our own armed forces for our nation's protection and security in this uncertain world. Today we see more and more evidence of deeper systemic problems that afflict the Department of National Defence (DND) and defence policymaking due to gross neglectperpetuated for years by both major Canadian political parties. The political establishmentfailedto properly resolveemerging problems,because they only usedsuperficial reform measures to treat the symptoms of decay over the past fifty years. Many of the reforms implemented over the years focused on secondary consequences rather than addressing the root causes of these challenges. In many ways, this approach has steadily deteriorated DND's capabilities, subsequently causing an intensification of the problems they were trying to solve. So here, we are today,thus incapacitated,facing major issues. At the end of the day, is it all aboutthe money? Many have pointed to the decades of underfunding experienced by the military as the primary cause of the mess the country finds itself in. However, itis notthat simple. Certainly providing more budget stability would help immensely, as National Defence is currently struggling through another round of budget cuts, led by a "yes sir" inefficient Minister. Yet it would be too simple to attribute the situation solely to budgets.In some respects, they too, are merely a symptom of the deeper issues afflicting defence. The issues are reflective ofthe severe lack of technical knowledge from which defence and government officials suffer. The lack of skilled staff members has corrosive consequences across the entire organization: incorrect decisions, inaccurate estimates, and a slowing of decision-making are all hallmarks of this problem. Unfortunately, I witnessed all these realities during my service in the military and the House of Commons. The core issue with National Defence in Canada,and arguably the most important one,concerns accountability, authority, and leadership. A persistent lack of accountability all the way to the top, including non-elected and elected officials, has created an inability to implement decisions quickly. In normal times,public servants in government departments would adhere strictly to policy and consensus-based decision-making that effectively requires the views of all players,including the supposedly knowledgeable elected officials around the table, to be aired and addressed quickly and efficiently. However, during years of exponentially increased incompetence, this process has become an extremely costly joke for taxpayers, and is now seriously endangering the safety and security of the country.Sadly,there is daily evidence that this circus continues with impunity with no end in sight. Operating an effective military requires acknowledging the uniqueness of employing deadly force and sustaining the personnel and equipment necessary to achieve that aim. Culturally, the military relies heavily on individual leadership within a chain of command to achieve its objectives. This is fundamentally different from any other department or the public service. We must acknowledge that there is an urgent need to elevate true leaders both in the military and the civil service dedicated to the military, and provide them with the requisite tools and authority tomanage programs in a timely and cost effective manner. All participants must "work the process" and build consensus with governmental stakeholders effectively and efficiently, withouttaking weeks months or years to achieve the objective. For example, the Conservative Government of Canada was ready to sign the agreement for the F 35 aircraftin 2015, but indecision and wobbling on the part of that government cost taxpayers dearly. Ten years laterthe Liberal Government of Canada, which hypocritically opposed the deal originally, signed it, spending substantially more, andsignificantly delaying delivery in crucial and dangerous geopolitical times. It should be noted that the government approach is fundamentally different from best practices in the private sector, where authority tends to adhere more closely to the military model than the public service one. This must change radically and immediately because we cannot afford more mistakes in a time of drastically increasing dangers on the international scene. At the present time too many people, with any particular agenda, are able to derail the department's objectives. Also, when things go wrong-as they so often do in Canada when it comes to procurement-the blame is dispersed so no one is held ultimately responsible, and nothing is fundamentally changed. It is necessary to implement a process that dilute neither accountability nor throws up roadblocks based on strictly artificial bureaucratic perspectives. Any comprehensive reform effort must address these points. Doing so would result in major aspects of defence falling into place-personnel management, procurement, budgets, etc. If Canada is to fix its national defence and reach the incredible potential of its capabilities, it must grapple with the root causes of the problems it is facing. Let's hope we see improvement soon!

Delusional Thinking in Today's World: A Growing Concern

By Dale Jodoin Canada is currently facing a disturbing and growing trend: the deliberate burning and vandalism of Christian churches. Since May 2021, 33 churches across the country have been destroyed by fire, with 24 of these confirmed as arson. In addition to these devastating fires, another 96 churches have been vandalized, with acts ranging from graffiti and broken windows to the desecration of religious symbols. This wave of attacks is raising serious concerns about the safety of religious institutions in Canada and what it might mean for the future of the country. The numbers paint a grim picture. Of the 33 churches that have been reduced to ashes, nearly three-quarters were intentionally set on fire. The remaining fires are still under investigation, but the sheer scale of these incidents suggests that many of them may also be cases of arson. What is particularly alarming is that these attacks have not been limited to any specific region. Churches in both urban centers and rural communities have been targeted, showing that this is a nationwide issue. Beyond the fires, the widespread vandalism of churches adds another layer of concern. With 96 churches across the country suffering damage, the attacks have become almost routine in some areas. Vandalism includes everything from offensive graffiti to broken windows and smashed religious artifacts. In some cases, there were attempts to set fires that were thankfully extinguished before they could cause significant damage. These incidents contribute to an atmosphere of fear and insecurity among religious communities, particularly in small towns where churches often serve as the heart of the community. The reasons behind these attacks are complex and multifaceted. In some cases, they may be linked to anger over historical injustices or social issues. However, the sheer number of incidents suggests that there may be other factors at play. One possible explanation is the growing polarization within Canadian society. As divisions deepen over social and political issues, some individuals or groups may feel that targeting religious institutions is a way to express their anger or make a statement. This kind of thinking can lead to dangerous and destructive behavior. Another factor that may be contributing to the rise in attacks is the phenomenon of copycat crimes. When a crime receives a lot of attention, it can inspire others to commit similar acts, believing that they are part of a larger movement. The frequency of church attacks in Canada raises the possibility that some of these incidents are copycat crimes, with individuals mimicking what they have seen in the news or on social media. The lack of consequences for these crimes is also a serious concern. Out of the 24 confirmed cases of arson, arrests have been made in only nine instances. This means that in most cases, the individuals responsible for these devastating fires have not been caught. This lack of accountability can create a sense of impunity, where criminals believe that they can commit these acts without fear of being punished. If this perception takes hold, it could lead to even more attacks in the future. Another issue is the security of churches, particularly those in rural areas or small communities. Many of these churches do not have the resources to implement strong security measures, making them easy targets for criminals. Without increased protection, these churches remain vulnerable to future attacks. This is a significant concern, especially for communities that rely on their local church as a place of worship, gathering, and support. Given the scale and severity of these attacks, one might expect them to receive widespread media coverage and public attention. However, this has not been the case. The issue of church burnings and vandalism has not been as widely reported as one might expect, and there are several reasons for this. One reason is that the media often focuses on stories that are immediately impactful or sensational. While the destruction of churches is undoubtedly tragic, it may not generate the same level of immediate public interest as other news stories, such as major political events or natural disasters. Another reason is the sensitive nature of the underlying issues. The targeting of churches touches on complex and politically sensitive topics, including religion, cultural heritage, and social justice. Media outlets may be reluctant to delve deeply into these topics for fear of alienating segments of their audience or provoking backlash. This cautious approach can lead to less coverage of these incidents, even as they continue to occur. There is also a growing concern that violence against certain groups or symbols is becoming normalized. When violent acts happen frequently, people can become desensitized to them, meaning they don’t find them as shocking anymore. If society starts to see these attacks as just another part of the news, they may not pay as much attention, and the media might not cover them as much. This normalization could lead to a dangerous cycle where such acts are seen as less shocking and more acceptable forms of protest or expression. Furthermore, Canada has been grappling with a host of other significant issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic, economic challenges, and political controversies. In this context, the ongoing attacks on churches may be overshadowed by these more pressing concerns. As a result, the full extent of this trend may not be fully recognized or addressed. The implications of these attacks are serious and far-reaching. The destruction of religious institutions not only threatens the safety and security of faith communities but also challenges the values of tolerance and respect that are foundational to Canadian society. If these attacks continue unchecked, they may contribute to a climate of fear and mistrust, further polarizing communities and undermining social cohesion. Moreover, the failure to adequately address this trend could signal a weakening of the rule of law, where certain groups or symbols are seen as legitimate targets for violence. This could lead to an increase in similar crimes, not just against churches but against other institutions or groups that are seen as controversial or unpopular. To prevent this from happening, urgent action is needed. Law enforcement agencies must prioritize these cases and work to bring those responsible to justice. This will send a clear message that these crimes will not be tolerated and that those who commit them will be held accountable. Additionally, communities must come together to protect their places of worship, whether by investing in better security or by fostering dialogue and understanding to address the underlying issues that may be driving these attacks. The media also has a crucial role to play in raising awareness of these incidents. By bringing more attention to these attacks, the public will be more aware of the issue, which can help prevent future crimes. Increased media coverage can also put pressure on authorities to take action and on communities to come together in support of one another. In conclusion, the rise in arson and vandalism targeting churches in Canada is a disturbing trend that cannot be ignored. These attacks are not just crimes against property; they are crimes against communities and the values of respect and tolerance that are important to Canadian society. If this trend is allowed to continue, it could have serious consequences for the future of the country. Now is the time for action. By working together, Canadians can stop this trend and ensure that places of worship remain safe and respected spaces for everyone.

Jesus Was a Tradesperson

By Murray Strong Jesus was a tradesperson Compulsory Certification is the answer! Canada needs construction workers or the economy stalls. Thousands are retiring from the trades, is a common cry from developers and the media. That is a true fact. Construction giants like Ellis Don or PCL want professionals building those billion dollar projects but the good times are over in construction .These men and women in various skilled trades are walking away into a deserved retirement with all that knowledge. The unions have been trying to warn government for years of this coming disaster. I know Premier Ford is concerned and many other government officials are reading this in the Oshawa Central Newspaper so we have their attention. God is also watching this story to see how we treat his Son . Remember Jesus and his father Joseph where proud to be known in their community as craftsmen. Jesus mother , Mary ,was proud of her son working with his hands . My personal dream would see the world UN convene and declare Jesus and his father Joseph be recognized as Certified Tradesmen. God said to Joseph , I need your son , the apprentice , to help me save the world. His apprenticeship is on hold. Carpenters build the frame all other trades add their equipment to our work. A simple tiny sentence in a tiny file in the Ministry of Labor needs a review . Give carpenters a reason to have pride in their trade . Open the carpenters apprenticeship to Compulsory Certification and inform all construction companies we need quick movement . Employ these young people wanting the job security of a red seal ticket. REOPEN the tec classes in high schools . Those old shop classrooms now sit in dust guarding old worn out furniture. Premier Ford , I would like to address you as Doug in all future rants . TDSB ( Toronto District School Board) has buildings with empty space to set up classrooms . Doug , you know some schools in Toronto have less students , some may have to be closed because the families moved away and seniors bought the homes . What fun would it be as a politician to announce to the community we are closing your school and will bus your children. Day one- angry calls from every voter in the surrounding 10 square miles . Day 2- lawyers. Day 3 - angry protests at your office. Day 4 – the Media hoard asking why? Doug tell those angry residents with children the funding will spread the building costs of operating the school to the skilled trades and the school board. Inform the media your Minister is onboard . The startup money to help the unions and the TDSB , to accelerate this training is waiting in a bank account. Tell them you have asked the construction industry to match the money in your decision. Tell the furious property owners and local businesses you’re going to save their local school by leasing empty space for apprenticeship training and spend their tax dollars in their school. Pour the money into any Ontario school board ready to help. Hire trades as teachers .That’s all you need. Just like Local 27. Remind all developers, it is not Doug Ford or the taxpayers that needs 500000 workers so pay your share. Out of breath. Ending this rant. Thank you. Denny Crane.

Conduct Unbecoming

from Wayne & Tamara My daughter, age 18, became involved with a young man 18 months ago. He was charming, a gentleman, bought her flowers, and showered her with love. He seemed mature, well-mannered, and respectful of us as her parents. He was very vocal to her father and me about the way he felt. He wanted to marry her. Period. He almost talked her into going to a justice of the peace before he left for the Navy, but she wouldn't do anything behind our backs. She was deeply in love with him. She is a good and responsible girl who is now in college. She is also quite beautiful. He left for the Navy. She wrote him every day and flew to see him graduate from boot camp. In the meantime he wrote to her father asking for her hand. We were concerned about their age, but we trusted him. After graduation she flew home, and he started acting weird, like a Mr. Hyde. He drank heavily and avoided her calls. He was rude and accusatory with her. My daughter found out the night he left for boot camp, he cheated on her with another girl who was also on her way to the Navy. The entire time at boot camp he was writing love letters to a third girl. He wanted to marry her, too. He bragged about these conquests. His friend said he would stare at girls with a gaze that wasn't even normal. Come to find out he was in trouble when he lived with his mother in another city. He was wild and stole a car to attend raves in the middle of the night. He took drugs like ecstasy. His mother sent him to his father, a professional who is remarried to a psychiatrist. Step-mom told us he has problems with character, integrity, and truthfulness, and he needs years of therapy. After the deeds were done, of course, my poor daughter was beyond grief. He bragged to her about all the girls he had sex with, including a 14-year-old. Well, daughter is now in college and doing well. She does not act depressed, but she hasn't dated since they broke up. She really, really loved this guy. He hurt us all, not just her. A true wolf in sheep's clothing. This kind of betrayal is so foreign to her, and we also feel violated because we believed this little creep and almost let him marry our daughter. Dora Dora, your entire family has been victimized by "this little creep," and each contact from him is another sadistic abuse of your daughter. He is not trying to win her back. He is victimizing her again and again. As a former naval officer, I know his conduct reflects poorly on the service. The military doesn't need more black eyes. I also know that as a member of the Navy, he is the property of the U.S. government from his toenails to the top of his head. He can be disciplined for getting a sunburn, wearing his hair wrong, or spitting on deck. First, I suggest you write his commanding officer detailing his conduct with your daughter. Include any written correspondence from him to you. Ask his commanding officer to demand that he break off all contact with your daughter. Explain what this boy has been telling her, including having sex with 14-year-olds. Second, your daughter needs to take steps to prevent him from contacting her. Time will help her get over this, but the healing won't start until all contact stops. Your daughter should not give up her values, but she must allow for the realities of this world. There is an age-old conflict between what is and what ought to be. The happiest people in this world pursue their own values, while at the same time clearly seeing what others are capable of. Wayne SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

Restoring Hope Is Job One

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford It’s happened before, and it was only a matter of time until it happened again. A brutal act of violence against a candidate for political office shatters the hope that reasonable people can exercise the democratic process. As has also happened before, these events cause a surge of short and long-term impacts on the health of society – especially children, teens, and young adults. There’s no escaping the economic cost of violence. Gun violence is just one kind of trauma, costing the U.S. a staggering $557 billion annually according to the National Institute for Health Care Management. What’s behind that gargantuan number? Medical costs are less than $3B. Policing and criminal justice costs add $11B. Employer hits to revenue and productivity are half a billion dollars. These are small change in that $557B figure. But there are two biggies. Income lost due to death and disability, work loss of caregivers, and incarceration costs $53.8 billion on average each year. Quality-of-life costs and the pain and wellbeing lost by those injured or killed and their families amount to a walloping $489 billion annually. These numbers are calculated based on an annual average in the U.S. since 2020 of about 45,000 people dying from gun-related incidents. Now consider the impact of gun violence as witnessed by the world with the assassination attempt on a presidential candidate. Like him or not, Donald Trump is a figure well known to all of us. Every shooting is horrible. But as the statistics above confirm, when it is someone we know, the effects are catastrophic, and it’s the innocent and vulnerable who pay the most. Maybe young adults have the fortitude to avoid negative impacts on their psyche, motivation, confidence, and general outlook. But we can’t find the studies to show it, and there’s not a lot of overt evidence for that. For millions of teens and younger children, one wonders how they internalize these events, the societal shock, then weeks of questioning, and the inevitable barrage of media, much of it depressing. What do these costs amount to for them? Times like this call for bold leadership at the highest levels. But who wants to take up the opportunity in politics? The ideal of shaping a better future through the debate of policies in a democratic system is all but lost. Now, the “wellbeing” calculus is deterring would-be aspirants. The number of young people turning away from the preparation for holding public office is bad enough. What’s alarming is the easy alternative of reckless abandon of the principles that uphold a decent society. Apathy is another sad and likely outcome. Montesquieu was the French judge and political philosopher who took up the leadership challenge. In 1748 with the publication of his book, The Spirit of Law, he upended old political ways with his theory of the separation of powers into executive, legislative, and judicial branches of administration. And he warned, “The tyranny of a prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy.” We’ve seen the cost of this in terms of war and peace. We need also to see it also in terms of general health. Can we measure the social, economic and health costs of loss of hope in the political process? With half of the world’s population living in the nearly 100 counties having elections this year, 2024 was bound to be tumultuous and costly. Is it time for healthcare leaders to take a bolder stand? Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Know your rights when renting

By Thersa Grant/Real Estate Columnist So, you’ve secured a rental in Durham Region. Wonderful. There are just a few things that concern you. The line in the lease regarding shoveling the snow and cutting the lawn. Do you really have to do that? Is that legal? Well according to the Residential Tenancy Act, the answer is clear. No, you do not have to do that. That being said, if you are renting a house in Durham Region, or a unit within a house, you’ll be hard pressed to find a lease agreement that doesn’t state exactly the opposite. In most cases the landlord will provide the lawnmower and shovels. In some cases, the tenant is actually expected to supply them. Often, there are several things listed in an agreement to lease a unit that are either illegal or not enforceable. One thing I come across a lot in lease agreements, is a clause that states that the tenant is responsible for the first portion of minor repairs due to normal wear and tear, and the landlord will be responsible for the remainder. This first portion can range from fifty dollars to two hundred dollars. This is akin to a deductible. This is completely outrageous. It is the landlord’s responsibility to maintain the unit in a good state of repair, period. Another clause you’ll find in most lease agreements nowadays is the key deposit. I often see a key deposit of two or three hundred dollars. The key deposit is returned to the tenant at the end of the tenancy providing the keys are returned to the landlord. However, the key deposit is not legally allowed to be more than the cost of the key. Several months ago, when showing an older unit in a triplex, the lockbox contained two keys. These were run of the mill keys that you would have cut in any local hardware store. When writing up an offer to lease the unit, there it was, the clause that speaks to the key deposit. The landlord was wanting a two-hundred-dollar key deposit for two keys that would cost you two or three dollars to cut. While it is important to know your rights, it is prudent to pick your battles. It is very important to have a good relationship with your landlord. Some people would have no problem cutting the lawn and shoveling the snow. If that is you, then great. If you are renting a whole house, it is often a great source of pride and enjoyment to keep the property looking beautiful. Although it is a rental, it is your home. Some people live in rental units for decades and have wonderful relationships with their landlords. Like all good relationships this takes work. Keep in mind that you are looking for a place to call home, and the landlord is looking for someone to live in their property. If you can strike a balance, everybody wins. The same mentality goes for the key deposit, while you legally do not have to give a deposit more than the value of the key itself, is that something you want to quibble about, or can you just oblige the landlord knowing you’ll get that back at the end of the tenancy? These are just a few situations. There are many. The key thing to remember is that no matter the circumstances, you always have options. If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If there are red flags that make you question a situation or the integrity of the landlord, take that seriously and if need be, walk away. Before embarking on the rental journey or even if you’ve rented for years but are back in the market for a new place, you may well benefit from reading the Landlord and Tenant Board of Ontario’s webpage and/or The Ontario Landlords Association webpage. Questions? Story ideas? You may reach me at: email newspaper@ocentral.com

Employers Hire Candidates That Are Best for Them

By Nick Kossovan Employers are human beings; like all humans, they look out for their interests. In other words, companies structure their hiring processes to identify and select candidates who will effectively serve their company's interests. People with meteoric careers often envied, acknowledge, and therefore strategically work with two facts: 1. The employer's interest dictates the workplace. 2. It's not the candidate's place to decide what's in the employer's best interest. "You can get everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar. Most job seekers hold the opinion that employers should select candidates purely based on their skills and qualifications. For the employer, "most qualified" doesn't necessarily equal "best." When recruiting and selecting new employees, employers have the right and responsibility to prioritize their organizational interests. Two harsh truisms: - Companies choose what's best for them. - There's no such thing as a "must-have" candidate. The concept of a great candidate (Yes, a great candidate is a concept.) is highly subjective. No company has gone bankrupt because it failed to hire a supposed "great candidate." Merely labelling yourself as a great candidate or talented without demonstrating your potential to enhance the employer's bottom line isn't a convincing reason to hire you. Unsubstantiated opinions are worthless. For your opinion(s) of yourself to be taken seriously, it must be backed up by credible evidence. During the hiring process, employers protect their interests in the following areas: Prioritizing Relevant Skills and Experience: Employers look for candidates with job-specific skills, knowledge, and experience. They want to ensure the new hire can hit the ground running and be productive immediately. Assessing Cultural Fit: Employers evaluate a candidate's values, working style, and personality to ensure they'll fit into the company's culture. All hiring decisions come down to: Will this candidate fit in? Considering Long-Term Potential: Employers prefer candidates with growth potential who can take on more responsibilities in the future. Avoiding Excessive Costs: Employers strive to hire the best possible candidate while managing their labour costs. (salary, benefits, training requirements) Mitigating Risks: In order to minimize the risk of making a bad hire, employers review a candidate's background and digital footprint, as well as speak to their references beforehand. With all of the above in mind, it's your responsibility as a job seeker to demonstrate to employers why hiring you would be in their best interest. Understand the Employer's Perspective "Your mindset matters more than your skillset." - Shiv Khera, Indian author and activist. Many job seekers struggle with their job search because of their mindset. A person's mindset is everything, especially when looking for work since it influences how they perceive employers and job possibilities. The savvy job searcher knows that it's not about them; it's about the employer. They envision the employer as a potential customer. Employers create jobs and, therefore, paychecks; consequently, they're the customers. As Harry Gordon Selfridge, the founder of Selfridge's department store in London, famously said, "The customer is always right." By empathizing with the employer's perspective, it'll become apparent that employers are making strategic investments in their human capital rather than simply filling open positions. An organization's long-term success requires hiring people who can contribute (read: add measurable value), not those with an extensive resume that doesn't show what measurable value-adds they can contribute to the employer. Employers are responsible for building a workforce that can drive productivity, protect the company's competitive advantages, and mitigate legal/reputation risks. Therefore, think about how you can position your candidacy as an excellent strategic investment. Highlight Your Unique Value Proposition When communicating with employers, you must go beyond simply stating your qualifications and experience. Focus on articulating a unique value proposition—your ability to meet the employer's most pressing needs and objectives—to answer the question in the back of the employer's mind, "Why should I hire this person? What difference will they make to the company?" Do you have a proven track record of boosting productivity and efficiency? Maybe you possess niche technical skills that would give the company a competitive edge. Perhaps you have a book of clients. Most job seekers fail to demonstrate how they'll provide a substantial return on their compensation—the employer's investment. Don't be like most job seekers! If you're asking for a salary of $95,000, be ready to explain quantitatively what the employer will get in return. Demonstrate Your Commitment to Their Success Employers are not just looking for someone to fill a role; they want someone who's passionate about contributing to the company's success. Show them that you're that person. Ultimately, the hiring process is not a charity or a favour employers do for job seekers. It is a strategic business decision that can make or break an organization's ability to thrive. While employers should treat all candidates with respect and fairness, they're well within their rights to design their hiring practices in a way that serves their own best interests. Just because an employer's hiring process doesn't work for the job seeker doesn't mean it doesn't work for the employer. ________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Dear Premier Ford

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City CouncillorPickering’s Mayor Kevin Ashe labels residents of Durham as racists. Dear Premier Ford and Minister Calandra, I am writing to you today to address and unequivocally rebut the false and misleading allegations made against me by Mayor Kevin Ashe and other members of the Pickering Council. It is deeply troubling that I have been consistently denied the opportunity to present my side of the story simply because certain members of the Council do not appreciate the truth I am bringing to light. First and foremost, let me clarify that the Integrity Commissioner’s report, which has been weaponized against me, is currently under judicial review. This process underscores the fact that the findings are not final, and I have every right to challenge them. It is imperative to note that the review is a legal and legitimate recourse, which should not be dismissed or undermined by political actors who are eager to silence dissent and undermine democratic processes. The hypocrisy of the current mayor and certain council members cannot be overstated. They have engaged in a pattern of behavior that is far more egregious than anything they have accused me of. Their tactics include maligning the character of Pickering residents by labeling anyone who opposes their views as “racists,” “Nazis,” “transphobic,” or “homophobic.” These baseless accusations are not only harmful to the individuals targeted, but they also serve to stifle free speech and legitimate criticism within our community. The attempt to label my supporters—and indeed, anyone who dares to question the actions of the mayor and Council—as being aligned with hateful ideologies is both unjust and deeply irresponsible. The real issue at hand is not my conduct but rather the fact that I am uncovering and exposing the truth about what is happening within the City of Pickering. This transparency is unwelcome by those who prefer to operate without scrutiny, and they are doing everything in their power to have me removed as a sitting councillor. Furthermore, the mere consideration of such authoritarian measures, which threaten to undermine democracy in our community, is unacceptable. If the municipal laws were ever changed to allow the removal of an elected official by there colleagues, democracy would fail to exist in the Western world. This is a direct attack on the democratic process, and we must stand firm against any such encroachments. The Toronto Sun recently shared a video of mine where I condemned the actions of the host, Kevin J. Johnston, whose podcast I appeared on. Despite my clear denunciation of his actions and the overwhelming support I have received from the community, my fellow councillors continue to weaponize this against me. Meanwhile, they conveniently ignore the fact that Councillor Brenner should be charged criminally for his violent rhetoric, including saying he wants to “sharpen his sword and decapitate the mayor.” I have included a video below that captures how I and members of the community are being treated by the Mayor and my colleagues. In this video, you will see how I have been threatened and bullied, and I have made claims of sexual, psychological, and workplace violence. This kind of violent rhetoric and behavior is unacceptable, and it highlights the lengths to which they are willing to go to silence me and anyone who opposes them. They have spread many lies, all of which can be proven, starting with the three draft motions my constituents asked me to bring forward, which I will also include below. These motions reflect the will of the people I represent, yet they have been met with hostility and deceit by those who fear transparency and accountability. These continuous attacks on my character and integrity are part of a broader effort to discredit my work and silence my voice. However, I remain steadfast in my commitment to serve the people of Pickering and to uphold the principles of transparency and accountability. In light of these considerations, it is clear that the mayor and council should step down from their positions for even contemplating such communist asks that threaten to destroy democracy here in the Western world. We need leaders who truly represent democratic values and prioritize the welfare of our community over personal vendettas. I urge you to consider the broader context of these attacks and recognize them for what they are: an attempt to suppress a voice challenging the status quo and advocating for the residents of Pickering. I am confident that the truth will prevail, and I will continue to fight for what is right, regardless of the obstacles placed in my path. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please feel free to reach out to me for any further clarification. https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1821962565120901197 https://youtu.be/kKNs6wVUGo0?feature=shared CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Pickering councillor responds to being on far-right podcast (youtube.com) With gratitude. "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

AN INVITATION TO PROMOTE IT RIGHT...

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - What is it with Oshawa, that they just can’t get it right? No matter the event. No advertising, no marketing. Nothing. Then organizers are left wondering why they failed. Why no one turned out for events. As a 40 year marketing expert. I can tell you. If you do not have a solid promotional plan. You do not have an event. To count on word of mouth is like expecting the weather to be optimal. You never know. Success comes to those that plan for it and for those that have the vision to carefully tailor a course of action to maximize any revenue you may have to make the event a success. We lost the car show that use to come to Lakeview Park. Why because of the lack of co-operation from the City. The lack of promotion. The criminal element and fear of physical harm to participants and cars. I received this via emai: Revving up Downtown: Kars on King returns on August 23 Hundreds of classic vehicles will line downtown Oshawa streets for everyone to admire when Kars on King returns on Friday, August 23 from 3:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. The City of Oshawa hosts Kars on King, a free downtown event featuring various vehicle makes and models dating back to 1991 and older and welcomes partner activations from the Canadian Automotive Museum, Tribute Communities Centre and Oshawa Tourism. This year, the City is celebrating its 100th anniversary. To mark the centennial, vehicles made in Oshawa will be provided with special identifications to display in their vehicles. If the organizers have had the decency of approaching the newspaper for marketing help. I would have allowed staff to extend 100% co-operation. No instead organizers decide to play politico and snub their noses at the only in print newspaper serving the City of Oshawa and all of Durham Region. Well, for those expecting to attend. Careful, where you step downtown Oshawa. From human feces on our streets, to use syringes. Not to mention those sleeping in alley ways and our beloved park. We as a City have so much potential. We waste it due to petty politics and general pettiness. I was in charge. I would have people coming from all over Canada. I would open special competition utilizing the GM test track. I would offer special rides. Special features.... but wait. What do i know....

Canada and the health care system crisis

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East Last month's Council of the Federation meeting of the leaders of the Provinces and the Federal government dedicated a lot of attention to the "recruitment and retention of health-care workers" as a key part of addressing broader health-care challenges. The notion of a major labour supply problem in Canadian health-care systems is on the news in the media and the political field. Scarcely a week goes by without yet another story or study about physician access and shortages in Canada's health system. It seems to me that health care has become atopic of futile daily conversation without a proposed solution in sight. Will a committed leader please step forward to deal with this issue? There is no doubt that family physicians play a crucial roleas the point of first contact and gatekeeper for health services. Nationally, a Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) report has stated that as many as one-fifth of Canadians are without a primary care physician. However, there is variation across Canada's regions, with 13 percent of Ontarians, 27 percent of people in British Columbia and 31 percent in Atlantic Canada saying they are without a family physician. These numbers have increased dramatically since the pandemic and even with a family doctor, large proportions of Canadians are reporting difficulty in getting appointments. The reason Canadians continue to experience a health-care system with shortages of physicians and other health-care professionals is really due to a lack of a well-established health policy. To effectively deal with a conjunction of forces that span provincial and federal policies regarding health care and its funding, physician behaviour, and demographic and technological changes we need competent professionals and committed politicians. The complex issues that need to be navigated and sorted to establish a better heath care system require political will and competent professional input. The basic dimensions of the problem are well established but the solutions are missing in action. To understand the issues affecting physician supply and access, let us first look at physician numbers. When it comes to international comparisons, Canada ranks near the bottom.Of 47 countries compared by the OECD in 2021, Canada ranked 35th at 2.9 physicians per 1,000 population. Provincial governments view physicians not only as health service providers, but also as cost centres and a source of expenditure. So as costs increase, decisions are ultimately determined by budgetary pressures. While governments seek to meet the need for health-care services through physicians, the supply of physicians is regulated by the same governments through medical school admissions and licensing. Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing? Governments perceive physicians as a major cost driver despite evidencethat while "physician numbers are a positive and significant driver of provincial government health care spending;the overall contribution to real per capita health spending is relatively small for most provinces. Access and availability of physician services are affected by demand and supply factors rooted in the structure of our health-care system and changing social, economic, and demographic forces.The demand factors include increasing utilization of services per capita, as well as a growing population. Canada's population has soared past 40 million from 35 million a decade ago. Then there are the increased demands from an aging population, as the proportion over age 65 grows in conjunction with rising needs in mental health, particularly amongst younger populations. Technological change also offers new and better procedures-witness, for example, the improvements in cataract care and knee and hip replacements. Such improvements can foster enhanced demand and increased expectations. Many current physicians are aging.It has been estimated that one in sixfamily doctors are nearing retirement age. While some of this loss could be counteracted by recruiting more international medical school graduates,the process for accreditation is long, and there is a shortage of residency positions for them, restricting their entry into the physician workforce. Another problem is that many graduates trained as family physicians,don't go into traditional primary care. They go into other fields, such as sports medicine, work solely in hospital emergency rooms or anesthesiology, or work part-time. Part of this is a function of changing preferences, and part is due to monetary incentivesgiven the costs and administrative burdens of running family practices. Obviously, financial and market incentives are a factor if physicians pursue work where they can earn more than they could by seeing more patients as a family physician where fees are capped. On average, physicians are working less than they did a decade ago as more seek better work-life balances. While physicians are working fewer hours, they are also experiencing higher administrative burdensgiven the highly regulated nature of provincial government health systems that reduce patient-centred working time and the explosion of technology that has expanded health information. Governments and health bureaucracies ultimately determine what public health services should be, what procedures are necessary or unnecessary, and what the budgetary envelope will bear. The allocation of public money requires accountability, and this desire for efficiency, combined with new technology, has created an exponential increase in paperwork and administrative costs for physicians. Generally speaking, a family practice is a small business with rising costs and expenses, but physicians have no control over the priceof their services.Simply increasing the quantity of patients they see runs up against reducing time per patient, rising paperwork burdens, and work-life balance concerns. In 1971, there were 125 physicians per 100,000 population, and their services seemed abundant. In 2022, there are 247 physicians per 100,000, and there are issues of scarcity and access. One can increase the number of physicians by boosting medical school enrollments further and licensing more international medical graduates, but this is no guarantee that they will go into family practice. Of course, one might venture that if governments do not want to spend more on physicians or reduce their administrative burdens, the public should be allowed to spend their own money on attaining the physician services they need. Here, we come up against the politics of Canadian health care that is committed to public health care and the belief that more private care creates an inequitable and unfair two-tier health care, even as increasing numbers of Canadians experience the unfairness of not having access to the physician services they expect. Provincial governments essentially ration access to public medical care but do not make it easy to spend your own money on health care unless you choose to cross the border into the United States or somewhere else; a version of two-tier care we seem prepared to live with. What is to be done? The story has been much the same for the last thirty years. Problems brew for a long time and periodically rear their head as health crises of waiting lists, crowded emergency departments, and shortages of physicians and other health professionals fester. Isn't it time for some new thinking and effective action from governments?

Delusional Thinking in Today's World: A Growing Concern

By Dale Jodoin In today's world, a troubling trend is spreading, where young people are being led to believe things that go against basic logic and science. This growing belief system raises serious questions about the future of our society and the mental well-being of those who buy into these ideas. The Decline of Common Sense and Science One of the most concerning aspects of this trend is the belief that people can change their biological sex. While modern medicine allows for changes in appearance through surgeries and hormone treatments, the fundamental biological makeup of a person—what they were born as—remains the same. Despite this, many people today are taught to ignore this fact, which leads to confusion. This confusion is made worse by the idea that there are hundreds of ways people can identify themselves. While it's important for people to feel free to express who they are, pushing these ideas too far can create problems, especially as people get older. When young people are encouraged to adopt identities that don't align with their biological reality, they might face serious mental health challenges as they age. The long-term effects of this kind of identity confusion are still unknown but could be very damaging. Politics and Science: A Dangerous Mix What's even more troubling is how politicians have gotten involved in this issue. Some politicians, in their quest for votes and power, have started supporting these ideas, even when they go against basic science. When politics interferes with science, the truth gets lost, and society suffers as a result. The involvement of politicians means that these ideas are not just being talked about—they are becoming laws and policies. People and organizations are being forced to go along with these new norms, even if they don't agree with them. Those who refuse might lose their jobs or be shunned by society. This creates a situation where people are afraid to speak up, and the pursuit of truth is pushed aside. The Impact on Mental Health The mental health effects of these trends are a big concern. As people try to navigate a world where they are encouraged to deny basic truths and adopt confusing identities, they might experience a lot of stress. Living in a state of confusion, where what you believe doesn't match up with reality, can lead to long-term mental health issues. The pressure to go along with these new ideas can make these mental health challenges even worse. People who feel they have to adopt identities that don't fit them might struggle with feelings of anxiety and depression. As society moves further away from reality, the need for mental health services will likely grow. But there's a worry that there won't be enough professionals to help everyone who needs it. What Does the Future Hold? Looking ahead, it's clear that continuing down this path could have serious consequences for both individual freedoms and the trustworthiness of science. In countries like Canada and the United States, where freedom of speech and thought have always been important, these new norms are threatening that freedom. Those who challenge these beliefs often face serious consequences, making people scared to speak their minds. We have to ask ourselves: What will the world look like in 15 years if this continues? The effects on freedom, science, and society could be severe. Will there be enough mental health professionals to help with the damage being done today? And more importantly, will we be able to return to a world where reason and reality are valued, or will we continue to let delusion take over? Moving Forward In the face of these challenges, it's more important than ever to stand up for common sense and real science. People should be free to live as they choose, but that freedom should be based on reality. Society must find a way to balance respecting people's rights while also holding on to the truth. If we don't, the consequences could be serious—not just for individuals, but for the future of our entire society. The road ahead will require courage and clear thinking. We need to be willing to speak out against ideas that don't make sense and stand up for the values of truth, science, and freedom. Only by doing this can we hope to create a future where these principles are protected, and where the next generation can face the world with confidence and a firm grasp on reality.

The Leasing Landscape

By Thersa Grant/Real Estate Columnist Securing an apartment rental today can seem like a daunting task. Things certainly have changed over the years. Gone are the days when you could just show up at a place being advertised for rent, put your best foot forward and have a conversation with the landlord. Today’s rental market is very competitive and can seem overwhelming for some. The rental market today is far more complex and involves providing a great deal of paperwork. Not only is there a lot of paperwork, but the paperwork also needs to reflect your history in a very positive light. There are many companies now that specialize in background checks, property management companies that employ people to check references and verify the information provided by a prospective tenant, and then there is the good old-fashioned gumshoe type of landlord. If you are going through a Realtor, you can be guaranteed that you will be vetted thoroughly. That’s okay, just be prepared. Today’s prospective tenant has to look at the search in a similar fashion to a job interview. Often in a job interview, the applicant will be asked “why should we hire you”? In the same way, a landlord wants to know why they should rent to you. That’s where your paperwork comes in. There are several documents that you will need to provide that range from a current pay stub to a landlord reference. Usually, prospective landlords will want to start with your credit profile to ensure you are good risk. Yes risk. When a landlord offers a house, or an apartment unit within a house for rent, they are very often trusting you with their most valuable asset. Therefore, your information needs to be current, as close to the date you are looking to rent as possible. Another piece of information a landlord will want to know about is your source of income. This is important because it tells the landlord what you can realistically afford on a monthly basis. Some landlords use a three times factor. Meaning they want to see that the tenant earns three times the rent on the unit being offered. A letter from your employer is required as well as your last two or three pay stubs. Landlords will usually want to know why you are leaving your current place of residence and want you to provide at least one but often two landlord references. This can sometimes be a problem for some if for instance you are coming out of a marital home that you owned. That being said, there are remedies for every situation. Landlords will most likely want to full credit check which involves a report from the credit bureau, usually several pages long, as well as a credit score. The credit score, or beacon score is the first thing landlords look for. If it’s a good score they will move on to the credit report. The credit report is a history of repayments to companies or institutions that you’ve borrowed from. Ultimately, the landlord is wanting to see that you make your payments in a timely fashion. Sometimes there are things on your credit report that can shine a negative light on you, but if you have a valid explanation for this some landlords are more than happy to listen and judge the situation for themselves. Once the paperwork part of things has been taken care of, the landlord usually turns to the character of the applicant. The applicant’s character is very important, especially if the landlord is renting a unit in a house where there are other tenants or there will be other tenants. The landlord will often turn to other landlord references or personal references along with an interview of the applicant to get a feel for the type of person the applicant is. While it can definitely be a task to find a nice place to call home, being prepared is half the battle. Just like applying for a job, you are wanting to present yourself in the best possible light as well as have a leg up on the competition. Putting together a package of documents can really help you do that. I have had clients that include a criminal background check, income tax forms from the previous year, pay stubs, letters of reference from landlords as well as colleagues. A package like that shows the landlord that you are a thoughtful person in the sense that you have thought of and taken the time to gather all this paperwork. It shows that you are thorough, organized, and detailed. Landlords like that, and it can go along way in helping you secure the apartment you want.