Canada and the Electrical Vehicle (EVs) adventure

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East I have written before about the largesse of the Ontario Provincial Government and the Federal Government in corporate welfare directed at Electric Battery and Electric Vehicle manufacturers, all of which are foreigner lead enterprises. Now it is interesting to analyze how misguided this approach is, spearheaded by politicians rather thn engineering professionals.Politicians may be great at wordsmitting legislation, but have no clue how to deal with essential infrastructure projects. They can spew verbiage non-stop, but essentially they are empty brainers when it comes to managing the future of this country. Considering the feasibility of the Federal Government’s plan under its Electric Vehicle Availability Standard to mandate that all vehicles sold by 2035 be zero-emission vehicles, we encounter a complete lack of vision. Moreover, it reveals a complete ignorance of the realities of this great country called Canada, which encompasses the second largest territory in the world. While the use of electric vehicles (EVs) offer environmental advantages over internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, concerns persist over cost, driving range, charging options, and carbon emissions during battery cell manufacturing, making mandated goals uncertain. Geopolitical and economic implications also arise from EV mandates in the US and Canada, particularly as they relate to the dominance of Chinese EV manufacturers. There are security risks associated with Chinese control of critical minerals essential for EV production, economic threats to the North American auto sector, and hurdles faced by local automakers in competing with their Chinese counterparts. The intensive use of aluminum in EVs manufacturing to lower overall weight and increase efficiency and driving range, also poses environmental concerns. Aluminum production is carbon-intensive, and increased usage raises an EV’s GHG emissions life cycle significantly, adding to an EV’s carbon footprint. In the event of a critical mineral shortage, prioritizing small battery packs for compact and midsize EVs could maximize GHG emissions reductions. However, automakers profit more from SUVs, and consumer preferences lean heavily towards SUVs. Thus, if automakers prioritize fewer of the larger battery packs that large electric SUVs use over many smaller battery packs, the expected reduction in GHG emissions may not materialize as forecast. There will also be potential disruptions in the market due to the prescriptive nature of the Electric Vehicle Availability Standard, which mandates that EVs comprise a specific minimum proportion of sales. If there is a misalignment among government, consumers, and auto dealers with these targets it could lead to elevated prices, vehicle shortages, and unmet consumer demands. Since EVs are relatively new to Canada, there is limited data on collision-related insurance claims, leading to uncertainty about future EV insurance costs. In the UK, for example, where EVs are more established, insurance rates in 2023 for EVs saw dramatic increases compared to conventional vehicles. Statistics also show that EV repair costs are higher than those for ICE vehicles. Maintenance and general repairs for EVs differ from those for conventional vehicles. Although electric drivetrains have fewer moving parts, potentially simplifying maintenance and repairs, EVs use sophisticated technologies that may raise repair costs. A large survey revealed that EVs encounter more problems than gas-powered vehicles, particularly with their electric motors, batteries, and charging systems, highlighting their complexities. EVs offer lower refuelling or charging costs compared to gas-powered vehicles. According to the federal government, driving a midsize car for 400 kilometres costs approximately $10 in electricity compared to $50 in gas. However, this comparison may not be entirely fair due to the significant government taxes included in gas prices that are absent from electricity prices. Assuming comparable taxes on electricity as on gas, the cost of the above recharging example could rise significantly from $10 to $25.62, still cheaper than gas, but less so than without the taxes. As of 2023, Canada had 26,500 public charging ports. Projections indicate that the country will need about 455,500 public ports by 2035. This requires adding about 98 new ports every day over 12 years. These estimates do not include private charging ports. Electrical utilities in Canada will face significant hurdles in ensuring that distribution grids can handle the substantial demand for EV charging capacity. Upgrading and expanding various grid components will be necessary, but the compressed timeframe imposed by the regulations raises uncertainty about timely completion. Overall, the government’s ambitious timeframe is unrealistic, risky, and potentially ineffective in achieving significant emissions reductions. Concerns also arise regarding threats to Canada’s auto sector, its nascent EV supply chain, and the substantial investments needed for charging infrastructure and grid enhancements. In addition, potentially higher EV ownership costs would disproportionately affect lower- and middle-income individuals, with accelerated adoption timelines exacerbating these issues. Canada needs a more flexible approach to light-duty vehicle emissions reductions. This includes rescinding the current mandated zero-emission vehicle sales minimums and replacing them with increasingly stringent GHG emission standards. Such a change would enable automakers to adjust their vehicle portfolios to market needs while still meeting emission reduction goals. Furthermore, Canada’s targeted standards and timelines should align more closely with industry efforts to source critical minerals and develop less costly, yet profitable EVs with superior operating characteristics. Beyond these concerns, more can be learned about this matter from the excellent analysis provided by Jerome Gessaroli, a Senior Fellow with the Macdonald Laurier Institute, In his article, “ A Bumpy road ahead – A critical assessment of Canada’s Electric Vehicle Availability Standard”, he raises important concerns.. For instance, did Ford, Trudeau and company have any contact with people who have deep knowledge in the EV field before recklessly spending taxpayers money on EV related investments and generous corporate welfare? We can now see the potential results of politically motivated action that lacks fundamental analysis and we can foresee the potential damage for the country due to ignorant politicians. In conclusion, we need to attract competent, thinking people to politics. People with expertise in various fields such as science, engineering and economics, who can ask the right questions and make reasonable decisions. Or do you think that the lawyers, political science graduates and staffers with no background in real life currently occupying elected positions are up to the task? Your opinion counts. Do what you can to express it.

DO WE REALLY NEED MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS?

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - Let’s look at this from an economic perspective. Why do we need municipal government? It appears that once elected. They disappear from the public eye. The rule of thumb is... do nothing during your term... and name recognition will carry you to a re-election. This norm has been in play for years. Reason. The same people turn out time after time and time. These voters do not bother to look at the credential of new candidates and vote on name recognition. This is wrong. Those that keep being elected. Case in point City of Oshawa. Only one councillor was replaced. All other including the Mayor got voted in. Can you really tell me that the people of Oshawa are that happy with the quality of life in Oshawa!!! You got to be kidding me. On top of that the City hits every tax payer with a huge tax increase and that is ok. I don’t know about you. I don’t mind paying, if i am getting my tax dollars worth... But, I don’t think this is the case here. I don’t know how any of these so called municipal elect can go to sleep at night knowing that there are so many sleeping on the street. I don’t know how these same elected can cash their cheques week after week knowing they are not competent to do the job they were elected. I say this with such freedom... Look at any of the candidates job history.... look at what they become after they loose an election. To represent the downtown. We have a deadbeat third rate musician. No business experience... No downtown business. Yet, he is responsible for making key decision for the downtown. You wonder why the downtown looks like a war zone. Why, there is no real business life. I say, the municipality wants to increase our taxes by 10%. The elected officials and city management staff salaries go down by the same amount. See how quickly, they put a tax freeze. People have time and time again complained they call their municipality and representative do not return calls. Do we need municipal government. Are we not better to just have a regional government? After all. The Region sits on 2 Billion reserves. Yes, 2 Billion of your tax dollars. Why, are we paying for municipal services when the region can accommodate. I think it is time for the silent majority to rise up and take control before we all end up living in a tent. You may smirk... Ahhh never me! That is what the people now living in the tents thought also. Get real, demand accountability and adequate service for your hard earned tax dollar.

Reality of Job Searching: There’s Always Someone Better Than You

By Nick Kossovan I always remind myself that there is someone younger, hungrier, and more skilled than I am; in other words, there's always someone better than I am. This keeps me humble and on my toes. Who can't relate to "wanting the best"? Employers can't be blamed for seeking and holding out for the "best" candidate, especially in a job market flooded with candidates. Every recruiter, HR professional, and hiring manager knows no perfect candidate exists. Yet, they still hunt for purple squirrels. Today's job market: · The number of jobs has decreased. · The number of candidates has increased. · Fewer people are leaving their job. With so many people seeking work, employers have, along with access to technology that can do the work—job seekers and employees are entering an era where they're starting to compete against AI, along with robotics—and cost-effective alternatives, such as hiring freelancers, contractors and sending jobs overseas, an array of options to get their jobs done. Hence, there's always the feeling that there's someone or something better out there. An interviewer's thoughts after an interview: "Yeah, [name] ticks off most of the boxes, but with all the resumes we're getting, there's a good chance I'll find someone who ticks off all the boxes." It’s common for employers to keep job postings open for several months while they try to find a candidate with specific skills, education, certification, and experience rather than hire for "potential," which is impossible to determine. Right now, candidates with shinier resumes and LinkedIn profiles than yours are going after the same jobs you're gunning for. The ocean of job seekers is filled with more experienced fish. However, there's a bright side; being "the best" is highly subjective. Perfect on paper or LinkedIn doesn't always equate to perfect in person. While employers seek the best, it should be noted that "the best" isn't always quantifiable, and skills and experience aren't the only things hiring managers consider. In actuality, "the best" is more about compatibility with the company’s culture and your interviewer(s)— especially if your interviewer will be your boss—and timing, which you have no control over, than "there's always someone better." There's no mythical unfairness or unseen forces at play other than life happening. Here's a question to ponder: Which reasons did you feel contributed to you not being hired for the jobs you interviewed for? Was it because the employer felt it was in their best interest to continue looking for a better candidate, or was it something else? Putting aside your self-interests, do you think the employers who didn't hire you made a mistake? If "yes," why? In previous columns, I've mentioned that being likable supersedes your skills and experience. Your charisma, character, smile, clothes, and how you present yourself physically will either work for you or against you. It's not rocket science to self-reflect and figure out which of your qualities, behaviours, and physical characteristics entices or repels employers. Prioritizing being likable over your skills and experience is a job search strategy that more job seekers should adopt. Several years ago, I was competing against another candidate for a position I was excited about. After three interviews and an online personality assessment, I was blown out of the water. Compared to past rejections, this one really hurt. Curious about who got hired, I kept an eye on the company's LinkedIn page to see when new employees appeared. Several weeks later, the person I lost out to updated their LinkedIn profile and appeared as a new employee. When I read their profile, I thought, "Damn! I'd hire her over me." She ticked off all the boxes and many more outside of skills and experience. When you get an interview, it's because what the employer read on your resume, LinkedIn profile, and social media appealed to them on some level, and they feel you could do the job. Now comes the difficult part, selling yourself as the best candidate. Your goal is to stop your interviewer from thinking there are better candidates out there than you, and not hiring you would be a mistake. Work in statements that illustrate why you're the best candidate. 1. "I'm excited about this opportunity because…" 2. "I really enjoy [product or service offered by the company]." 3. "I admire the way you [or the company]..." 4. "I solved a similar problem." 5. "I'm a match for this job because…" 6. "I consider this job a good match for my long-term goals, and I would like to continue building my career with this company." 7. "Collaborating with others is one of my greatest strengths." 8. "One of the things I would keep an eye on if I were hired is..." Despite many hiring managers' attempts, it’s impossible to determine "the best" candidate during the recruitment process based on a measurable scale alone. Therefore, stop fretting about being "the best" and focus on being the best and likable version of yourself. I've yet to meet a hiring manager who hired a candidate they didn't like, no matter how much they thought the candidate's skills and experience were "the best." _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

QUESTO, E-COSI! -- KEFFIYEH

By Rosaldo Russo Allow me to begin this column by thanking the Oshawa/Central newspaper for allowing me the opportunity and access to the press. Not to many if any allow an average person like me to tell the world what I see and think. In my opinion. The Editor/Publisher is a real upstanding type of guy. He shoots from the hip and hold traditional core values. My name is Rosaldo Russo. I came to this great country to make a better life for myself and my family. I thank Canada for everything it has allowed me to do and earn. I worked construction all my life. I know the value of hard work and honesty. I remember as a boy my father always telling me to work hard and buy land. So I did. I remember days when I did not have enough to eat. I go to work... but I did not wait for hand outs. I rounded up my pride my skill and my determination to succeed and went to work. In those days the only benefits we received was the fact we were employed. Before retiring I was the owner and operator of local material supply company that allowed me to retired without worry. Now that I have time to enjoy life. I look around me and have some concern for future generations. I see that the world is finished. This week it was brought to my attention that an MPP attempted to wear one of these Keffiyeh during session and was kindly asked to leave the Ontario Legislature. Apparently Sarah Jama thought it would be appropriate to wear one of these Keffiyeh during session as a sign of open public disobedience and a slap in the face to all Canadians. Canadian culture, customs and traditions. The argument was that she had the right to support a terrorist group called Hamas. A group that is using the people of Palestine as their shield against an onslaught ass kicking by the Israeli. Hamas, initiated this and now we the people of Canada have to support their cowardly attempts to cry wolf. Really. I say, that this Sarah Jama does not represent Canadian values and traditions and that she should be expelled as an MPP. So should the two other supporters that decided to walk out with her. MPP Joel Harden and Kristyn Wong-Tam. What is the meaning of the kufiya? The History and Significance of the Hirbawi Black and White ...In Palestinian culture, the kufiya is designed to resemble a fishnet, symbolizing the livelihood of the Palestinian. These type of garments are far from Canadian. Far from in the best interest of the people of Canada. These three politicians should be made an example. That unless it is Canada first. You do not belong in government pretending to work in the best interest of the Canadian people and supporting foreign wars. We are Canadian first. As representative of the people of Canada it should not be allowed for our representatives to dress like foreigners. Upholding foreign cultures and agendas. I think they should incorporate this in citizenship. Canada first. You want to continue with your traditions and culture. Do it privately. The wear of this scarf to me is insulting. I worked all my life to contribute and respect traditions and Canadian customs. To have an MPP disrespect me and Canada’s heritage, customs, traditions. No excuse. In Trumps words. “THEY SHOULD BE FIRED”. Send a clear message to all. Canada for Canadians.

Logic newsprint is dead not!!!

By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher ACCOMPLISHED WRITER/AUTHOR OF OVER 800,000 Published Columns in Canada and The United States “I live a dream in a nightmare world” Always Remember That The cosmic blueprint of your life was written in code across the sky at the moment you were born. Decode Your Life By Living It Without Regret or Sorrow. - ONE DAY AT A TIME - In the newspaper industry there are three types of publishers. The incoming - the outgoing and those that have no clue what they are doing. The latter are the ones responsible for damaging the integrity of the industry. Companies like SNAP, SNAP’ed, Oshawa Life, Neighbour and the many other fly by niters. A bunch of socialite editors that have no clue on the industry and rely on brown nosing photo opt politicians, promise the world and deliver empty promises. This tarnishing the integrity of real publications of actually giving clients value for their invested dollar in advertising. The incoming think they can take the world by storm and in many cases fail to establish a solid vision for their publication. You, must have solid direction and a timeline for when to accomplish goals. At the Central we always respected those established before us and made sure we never competed. Instead we created our own market and assured customer satisfaction was our prime goal. This philosophy has made us number one today and a leader in our industry. Many incoming do not do this. Many incoming just attempt to copy the outgoing’s papers style and hope for the best. Normally these publications are free to the public. Mistake one. Normally these publications are monthly or bi-weekly as they can’t establish a solid client base. Any publication that does not charge, by it’s own admittance has no readership. This is why it has to be given for free. Many of these free publications are the first to go out of business and in Durham we have had our share of publishing failures. The outgoing publishers or publications (Metroland) are those that have been entrenched in the community they served for so long that they really do not care. Their primary goal is to maintain the status quo and use the political influence in those communities to benefit financially. The outgoing publishers are more prone to fall for fads like online publishing. It is cheap to advertise online.... Unfortunately you get what you paid for. Who is really online? Today internet has become nothing short of a public toilet. The promise of millions of viewers when in reality on any given post if your lucky you get 10 viewers. Why is this you may be asking. Well, the sea of millions is made up for a particular niche. The average person is far from that niche. The niche is made up of teams of online tech support that know how to manipulate and influence trends and fad online. For the average entity. This is way out of their budgets.... This in part is why public notices by municipalities online are failing. No one is getting their notices. The municipalities and the Region all made the same mistake. Making the assumption that all taxpayers have internet, computers and or smart phones. Road side signs don’t work. Road side signs work on the 3 second rule. If you audience does not grasp the message in 3 seconds. That billboard is a waste of time and money. Going to public building to read boards is not working out as people are busy enough to go to building to find out what is happening in their communities. Then what is the answer? Simple. People by the thousands are demanding that municipalities publish in their local newspapers, I know so because we get all the new subscribers. Local newspaper are superior to national papers as the local papers are published by a local small business doing a big job. Also local papers are time proven and trusted to be true. Online is proving to not work. Even for the debunked Metroland. Their online version is seriously failing. In print newspaper is making a huge come back. So much so that The Central is exploring taking over markets right across the GTA. Support your local small business making a huge difference in the way you stay informed. READ THE CENTRAL YOUR NUMBER ONE SOURCE FOR NEWS IN DURHAM

The Truth Will Set You Free

By Lisa Robinson - Pickering City Councillor In today's world, it often feels like questioning the narrative pushed by those in positions of power is like committing a cardinal sin. Many people are confused as they look at the truth being told it’s evil, while evil is being pushed down our throats to be looked at as truth. Many confused with this reality are afraid to speak out for fear of the repercussions of being labeled as conspiracy theorists, bigots, racists, you know the usual. It’s become very “normalized” to insult and call people names to whom you do not agree. Especially by those keyboard warriors over social media with fake accounts. Politics is no different. Whether it's city staff, politicians, developers, or consultants, there's a prevailing expectation that their version of events is beyond reproach, and anyone daring to challenge the status quo is swiftly labeled as being the problem. In my opinion, the real issue lies in the many different manipulation tactics employed by these individuals and entities. They are well-versed in the art of steering public opinion to serve their own interests, not the people’s. From meticulously crafted websites and carefully curated social media posts to surveys designed to yield predetermined outcomes, every tool in their arsenal tool kit is wielded to shape the narrative in their favour. And when faced with inconvenient truths or probing questions, they resort to tactics like half-truths or verbal diarrhea, all in an attempt to deflect attention away from the crux of the matter and make it all about you, the alleged perceived problem. It's a phenomenon reminiscent of the frog boiling method which I have written about in a previous op-ed about the gradual, imperceptible changes to the environment that lull the unsuspecting into complacency until it's too late to react. Many among us remain too busy or lazy to delve into the truth or even entertain a different perspective. It's this lack of critical thinking skills that allows authoritarian and/or dictatorial tendencies to seep into our everyday lives virtually going unnoticed. The irony is stark when we consider the tales of resistance that captivate us on the silver screen. Whether it's the dystopian worlds of "Divergent," "V for Vendetta," “Terminator” or "The Hunger Games," we readily identify with the brave souls who defy tyranny and champion freedom. Yet, when confronted with similar dynamics in reality, some choose to look the other way, their eyes firmly shut to the encroaching shadows of oppression. History has proven that when leaders exploit economic hardships, and societal grievances using propaganda to manipulate public opinion, it willlead to the rise of authoritarian regimes and the erosion of democratic principles. Mark my words, you are, this is, history in the making, and years from now they too will be wondering how did the people let this happen. But as Simon wrote, "A leader is someone who can see what everyone else can see, but can think differently." True leadership demands the courage to challenge the status quo, to question everything, and to employ critical thinking skills in the pursuit of truth and justice. It's high time we heed the lessons of our favorite fictional heroes and become the architects of our own destiny. Stop being a slave to your phones, stop relying on mainstream media, and politicians to tell you the tailored truth, and emerge yourself in research. It’s not a coincidence that what is happening here in Pickering is also happening across Canada, and other parts of the world. Stop blindly accepting the narratives handed down to us. One of the first things I was told as a Politician was “These people are not your friends.” It didn’t take me long to recognize the truth in that advice. But even more importantly, was when I realized that statement wasn’t solely for me, it was directed to all of us, the people. Don’t be afraid to speak the truth, for as the saying goes, “The truth will set you free.” "Strength Does Not Lie In The Absence Of Fear, But In The Courage To Face It Head-On And Rise Above It"

UNDERSTANDING YOUR RIGHTS

Tahir Khorasanee, LL.M. Senior Associate, Steinbergs LLP Financial institutions are often accused of using fraud investigations as a guise to oust “troublesome” mortgage advisors. A case in point is a mortgage advisor who was wrongfully accused of fraud by the Bank of Nova Scotia and was subsequently awarded $919,268. Mortgage advisors frequently inquire if they can take legal action against their employers for damaging their reputation and hindering their chances of employment with other prominent financial institutions. The response is affirmative; they can file a lawsuit for defamation. The criteria for defamation, as outlined in Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 61, [2009] 3 SCR 640, at paras. 28ff, include the dissemination of a statement that (a) refers to the plaintiff, (b) is communicated to a third party, and (c) carries a defamatory connotation or insinuation that diminishes the plaintiff’s reputation in the eyes of reasonable individuals. The determination of whether the statement is defamatory is objective, i.e., an average person would perceive the statement as damaging to the plaintiff’s reputation. However, the ultimate determinant is the mortgage advisors’ willingness to engage in litigation. Gary Curtis, a former Mortgage Development Manager at the Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), found himself in the midst of a legal dispute that lasted over ten years. The case, which originated as a wrongful termination and defamation lawsuit, transformed into a concentrated defamation claim following several amendments. Gary was a top-performing Mortgage Development Manager at The Bank of Nova Scotia. There was a disagreement over whether he ranked #5 or #4 in overall performance. He argued that the bank inaccurately calculated his sales below his group leader’s to exclude him from an exclusive group entitled to special benefits. After a 12-year tenure, The Bank of Nova Scotia suspended him under the pretext of a covert fraud investigation, compelling him to resign. The bank accepted his resignation and marked his employment file as “ineligible for rehire.” On May 3, 2012, an investigator initiated a “SIFT” alert on the Bank Crime Prevention and Investigation Office (BCPIO) of the Canadian Bankers Association (CBA) database, citing the following reasons in the SIFT Database Input Request Form: Substantial evidence was discovered indicating that Curtis intentionally submitted fraudulent documents on multiple applications. These documents included falsified Notices of Assessment (NOA’s), employment letters, pay stubs, and financial statements, as well as bank documents bearing forged customer signatures. These actions, in isolation, constitute a prima facie case concerning the alleged fraud. Curtis resigned during the investigation. Gary received job offers from the mortgage departments of two other major banks. However, due to the SIFT alert, each offer was promptly rescinded after the prospective employers contacted BNS and were informed that Gary had submitted fraudulent documentation in support of mortgage applications. A third bank rejected his application after receiving this information from BNS. BNS maintained the SIFT alert for seven years, effectively preventing Gary from securing employment with a major financial services institution at the peak of his career. Gary’s professional trajectory took a drastic turn when he was accused of submitting fraudulent mortgage applications. Despite his stellar performance, the bank’s investigation resulted in a “SIFT” alert that effectively barred him from employment in major financial institutions. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice held the bank accountable for defamation, as it failed to substantiate the veracity of its statements or the defense of qualified privilege. Gary was awarded $919,268. Ultimately the case turned on BNS’ inability to prove from the evidence that it had a basis to conclude Gary was involved in fraudulent activity. This case underscores the intricacies of defamation law and the delicate balance between safeguarding reputation and upholding freedom of expression.

Council Highlights - April 2024

Mayor Elizabeth Roy Council highlights gives an overview of important decisions, discussions, and agenda items from Whitby Council meetings. The goal is to give residents a snapshot of the meetings. More information, including Council meeting minutes, can be found at whitby.ca/CouncilCalendar New scholarship partnership between Whitby Fire, Durham College - Council has approved a partnership between Durham College and Whitby Fire and Emergency Services for a new Inclusive Excellence Scholarship Award. Durham College will fund two scholarships per year of approximately $7,500 each, in exchange for the use of a Whitby fire vehicle in its Fire Pre-service Program. The agreement is in place for three years, with the option for Durham College to renew for an additional three years. The scholarship is for racialized and/or economically challenged high school students from the Town of Whitby, who have been accepted into either the Fire Fighter Pre-Service Education and Training or Fire Prevention and Technology program at Durham College. Council approves traffic calming measures for Port Whitby area In response to community concerns about speeding, aggressive driving, and noisy vehicles, Council has voted to introduce new traffic calming measures in the Port Whitby area including: a Community Safety Zone from Charles Street to Dufferin Street, crosswalk pavement markings at stop signs to delineate pedestrian crossings, an area-specific speed limit of 40 km/hr and installation of signage to advise of the speed limit, and a request for additional enforcement from Town of Whitby By-law services and Durham Regional Police Service. The Port Whitby area is one of several areas in Whitby where increased residential density, infilling, and intensification are expected to create a compact neighbourhood. 2024 Downtown BIA budget approved, includes increase to special tax levy Council has approved the 2024 budget for the Downtown Whitby Business Improvement Area (BIA). The 2024 budget totals $282,283, which is $93,159 lower than the previous year's budget. Despite the decrease in the overall BIA budget, the special tax levy that funds the majority of the BIA’s operations will be increasing by five per cent (or $10,500). The special tax levy applies to business properties within the Downtown Whitby BIA boundary. As recommended by the BIA board, the 2024 budget includes the continuation of the flower and planter program and the Christmas Market event, however the annual Beer Fest event has been removed from the budget and will be cancelled for 2024. Council also received for information the BIA’s 2024 Beautification Report, which outlines beautification plans for this year. These include floral planters and baskets in the downtown, an annual on-street patio on the northeast corner of Brock Street and Colborne Street, art activations in four storefront windows, and a downtown clean-up on Earth Day. Dredging work will impact use of Gordon Fields Work is moving forward on plans for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) Canada to remove contaminated sediment from the Whitby Harbour through a multi-year dredging program. In exchange for the use of Town land to facilitate remediation, DFO will increase the scope of the dredging work to include two Town-owned water lot areas. Recent studies indicate that the Town would otherwise be liable for $1,064,000 in estimated remedial dredging costs. Whitby Council has given approval for DFO to use a portion of Gordon Fields adjacent to the Gordon Street Boat Ramp from July 15, 2024 to October 31, 2026 in exchange for the in-kind remediation work. Council also approved giving DFO access to Town lands adjacent to Promenade Lake Park to allow loading and unloading of barges from the Federally owned portions of the promenade and pier. Removal of harbour sediment will require a period of containment and drying followed by trucking to an approved landfill site. The project is anticipated to begin in mid-July 2024 and take 27 months to complete. The remediation project as well as restoration of Town lands will be entirely funded by DFO. Use of the Gordon Fields by DFO will impact Town of Whitby events and community events held in that space such as the Town’s annual Canada Day event, Ribfest and India Day. A Town report says events will be reviewed to determine whether they can be relocated.

CANADA FLAG PROUD

By Dale Jodoin In our town and across our country, there used to be one flag that everyone knew and respected. It was our flag, the one that stood for our whole nation. It reminded us of freedom—the freedom to speak, to think, and to follow any religion. When we heard stories about our brave soldiers fighting to protect these freedoms, we would look up at our flag and feel proud. But things have changed. Now, it seems like every month there's a new flag or a new cause that we're supposed to learn about and remember. Our old flag, the one that used to fly high above everything else, doesn’t get the same attention anymore. It feels like it's just given one day to shine, while other flags and causes get a whole month or more. Our flag used to be everywhere—above schools, city halls, and public squares. But now, other flags stand tall in those places, and our flag looks lonely and forgotten. Fewer people seem to care about it. Some even protest against it or burn it, which makes those of us who remember its importance really sad. These days, everyone talks about freedom using different flags. But it seems like our old flag, the one that actually represents the freedom of our whole country, gets lost in the mix. It's like it's no longer just about our country; it's about everything else. I wish our flag could be the one that everyone looks at again with pride. I hope it doesn’t just end up forgotten in a drawer somewhere. It would be great if we could all remember what it stood for—bringing us together as one nation. I hope we can find a way to make our flag mean something special to everyone again, just like it used to.

Social Media Wants Your Money

By Nick Kossovan The American way (read: capitalism's primary goal), which greatly influences the Canadian way, has always been about separating you from your money. I'd wager that within moments of the Internet becoming available to the public on April 30, 1993, many asked themselves, "How can I use this new medium to hawk stuff?" In 1997, SixDegrees launched the first online social networking site, marking the birth of social media. Almost immediately, Hucksters, charlatans, snake oil merchants, and outright fraudsters tumbled out of the woodwork alongside corporate advertisers. Have you seen the online ad for the Bluetooth-enabled Shiatsu foot massager? How about the one for the organic mushroom supplement powder? How about the micro-magnetic slimming earrings? Initially, social media thrived on feel-good content. However, social media companies have bills to pay and profits to make; thus, understandably, monetization became their focus, resulting in social media being flooded with ads for cheap, bright, and shiny items. Today, you can't scroll through your feed without being inundated with ads promoting supplements, subscription services, or self-proclaimed "experts" teaching a craft they've never mastered. Remember the days of browsing the Internet and having to venture off to visit the seller's website? The creation of social commerce—the marriage of e-commerce with social media—eliminated the need to venture off. Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and TikTok now have native social commerce features baked into their respective platform. This feature, when leveraged by Svengali-like marketing strategies introducing you to products you didn't know existed, not surprisingly, leads to impulse purchases. Who knew there was an avocado slicer 3-in-1 tool for hassle-free avocado preparation for only $3.47? According to the ad, there are less than 400 left. At that price, it's a must-have. Never mind that I can't recall the last time I ate an avocado. As kitchen junk drawers, closets, garages, basements, and storage lockers will testify, creating fear of missing out (FOMO) by offering a cheap product and claiming inventory is dwindling is a proven marketing strategy. It's anyone's guess what percentage of our online and offline consumerism are impulse buys. Thanks to social commerce, a "marketer" can present you with a well-priced hoodie as you scroll through TikTok. To take advantage of this deal without overly interrupting your viewing of shuffle dance videos, simply click "Buy." I find it exhausting to scroll through my social media feeds, feeling that everyone is trying to sell me something. Social media has become cluttered with "Buy me!" and become an algorithmic traffic driver for targeted advertising. Then there's the fakery factor. · Despite all the claims, there's no "free." Everything has a price: time (attention) and/or money. · There's no genuine "I want to help you" advice, only pitches and sales funnels. · The freebies are shallow. A life improvement e-book offered for "free," in exchange for your email address, is just recycled advice you've already heard or read. There's nothing revolutionary or exclusive about the advice, as was promised. How many businesses behave on social media irritates me. Naively, I assumed social media would evolve into a people-to-people medium, like the whole world sharing one big kiss, as opposed to the business-to-consumer digital marketplace it has become. Weight loss programs, get-rich-quick schemes, influencers shilling products that don't produce results, Facebook friends selling beauty products, salons pushing Botox and fillers and ads that intentionally make asterisk text impossible to read. Companies that stretch the definition of "free," "guarantee," and "unlimited." Products designed to wear out quickly. Subscription-based models for everything. At some level, social media and the Internet thrive on veiled scams. My angelic side believes that those behind the transformation of social media into a Turkish bazaar simply want what we all want: money to buy time and freedom. Because our economic system works like a Ponzi scheme, everyone, to some degree, tries to make money, to move around with their consumerism, by taking advantage of others. In other words, who am I to judge those who sin differently than I do? When you consider how social media companies generate their revenue, it's hard to condemn their monetization efforts. Your role in social media isn't that of user. You're the product offered to advertisers and those who are dreaming of making money on social media. Platforms aggregate your attention (aka views), which they then sell to advertisers. It shouldn't come as a surprise that your attention span and actions are being commodified when you're on social media. In economics and finance, there's an adage that's especially relevant here: "There's no such thing as a free lunch." From an economic perspective, nothing is ever free. In general, if something appears to be free, like a social media account, you're paying for it in some tricky way. Always consider where your money is going. Consider your life goals more carefully. Don't let social media dictate your dreams. Sadly, social media has replaced the American dream of working hard and making money with the dream of not working hard and making money, resulting in our social media feeds being inundated with shameless attempts to separate us from our money. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

WHY???

from Wayne & Tamara I met Sean a year and a half ago in a crowd of 50,000 people. We struck up a conversation and really hit it off. He gave me his number, which I forgot. I thought about tracking him down, but figured if it was meant to be we would meet again. Three weeks later I got a phone call from him, and we have been together ever since, until about a month ago. I left my friends and my life that I was used to. Everything was fantastic, we were in love, we thought we were going to get married. We just mentioned it a few times, but it wasn't really a topic of conversation. Anyway, something changed in Sean two months ago. He didn't cheat that I know of, but in a week's time he broke up with me, demoted himself from a high ranked position at his job, and became depressed. He went to the doctor and is doing better now, but I am confused. How can everything be so great and all of a sudden he changes his mind about everything in his life? He still likes to have sex and hang out with me sometimes, but doesn't have any interest in getting back together. I need to stop showing interest in him, I think, and get on with my life, but I am having a hard time doing this. Why is he acting this way, and is there any way we will be together again? Jessica Jessica, most people never find out the true why behind another's actions. Everyone wants the imaginary ‘closure,’ but the closure they want is to have what they want. That is why almost no one gets closure. As a psychological concept, closure doesn't work. When a relationship ends, people don't want to learn why, they want to learn why not. They want to fix it. But if a man used a woman for sex, how will learning the truth give her closure? If a woman never loved the man, how can that truth give him closure? You are not in a relationship with Sean, but he is having sex with you. He sounds like somebody with a plan for himself. Friendship sex is not in your best interest. You need to stop having sex with him and move on. Asking why only traps you. Wayne & Tamara Winnowing I am a female, 19. I am more mature than my age, and sometimes I feel I am trapped with an old soul in a young body. I fell in love with a man, 38. We were in a long-distance relationship for six months, but two months ago we decided I would move to New York to be with him and build my life there. We had a bad time. I couldn't find myself, and he was occupied with his business. I was very unhappy and we argued constantly. Now I am back in Israel, and he is there. He decided it would be easier for me to build my life here, and it would be good for us to take a break. He is afraid I might regret marrying him because I haven't experienced life yet. Is this kind of relationship possible, or am I holding on to something which is doomed from the start? Leah Leah, why do you need to mention age difference or other factors? When you were with him in New York, you were unhappy and argued constantly. Why can't that be the truth of the matter? You gave it a try, it didn't work, he pulled away. Every man is not your future husband. Most men you will date until you see the relationship isn't going anywhere. That's what dating is all about--not snaring a man, but separating the wheat from the chaff. He's chaff. You're looking for wheat. Keep sifting. Wayne & Tamara SEND LETTERS TO: Directanswers@WayneAndTamara.com Wayne & Tamara are the authors of Cheating in a Nutshell and The Young Woman’s Guide to Older Men—available from Amazon, Apple, and booksellers everywhere.

Large Bowel Cancer in Younger People on the Rise

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford New statistics published by the American Cancer Society should be alarming. The numbers point to an increase in colon malignancy in people in their 20s, 30s and 40s. Yet, there’s been a decrease in large bowel cancer among those over the age of 65. In people under 50, the rate has been increasing by about two percent a year since the 1990s. This data goes against a basic law. Most malignancies occur in older people, and this has been true of colon cancer. This new data sends up a red flag that should not go unnoticed. Moreover, this is not just a North American trend. Large bowel cancer is on the also rise around the world. The question is, why has this occurred. Colon cancer is now the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men under the age of 50. And it’s the second leading cause for women under 50 years of age. Large bowel cancer and rectal cancer are often linked together. And there is evidence that this increase may be related to an increase in rectal cancer. But it does not totally explain the increase. Do genes play a role in the earlier onset of malignancy? A family history of the problem is a factor for some people. For others, doctors have suspected that cell mutations may be the driving force. The presence of large precancerous polyps in the colon means a greater risk. But questions remain about why there is a rise in large bowel cancer among younger people. Could it be that changing lifestyles all over the world play a role? Despite talk of healthier diets, people are eating more red meat than ever – up over 10% in the last decade and more of it consumed after processing into convenient foods. People are eating other highly processed foods, downing too much sugar, and binge drinking alcohol. Researchers have shown that some individuals have good bacteria in their intestines, others bad bacteria. There are also questions about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These pain killers may have an adverse effect on the gut. Clusters of malignancies are seen in some areas. In southern Mississippi, people living near chemical plants are exposed to trace elements such as nickel, arsenic, and chromium. Could these potentially toxic materials be associated with the increase in cancer? Researchers are also aware of another pandemic, and not a viral disease lasting just three years. It’s the much worse global crisis of obesity, a long-enduring pandemic. The increase in obesity mirrors the increase in malignancies. But not all patients with colon cancer are overweight. Experts contend there is no single smoking gun responsible for cancer. Multiple risk factors need to be addressed. What can people do to decrease the risk of dying from colon cancer? People need to assist their doctors with early diagnosis. First, never assume rectal bleeding is due to hemorrhoids. Second, colonoscopy is the only way to rule out malignancy. This requires laxatives that clean the bowel of fecal material. Then doctors insert a lighted instrument to examine the large bowel. This can be done under full anesthesia or with medication to relieve the minimal discomfort. Please, do not listen to scaremongers saying colonoscopy is a painful procedure. It’s better labelled a discomfort. Sedation-free procedures are safe, and people can return to normal activities right away. How many people with rectal bleeding have said, “No one is going to a colonoscopy on me,” and now are dead? Dying from a metastatic colon malignancy is many times more painful than the temporary discomfort of a colonoscopy. Don’t make this terrible mistake. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jonesBy W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford New statistics published by the American Cancer Society should be alarming. The numbers point to an increase in colon malignancy in people in their 20s, 30s and 40s. Yet, there’s been a decrease in large bowel cancer among those over the age of 65. In people under 50, the rate has been increasing by about two percent a year since the 1990s. This data goes against a basic law. Most malignancies occur in older people, and this has been true of colon cancer. This new data sends up a red flag that should not go unnoticed. Moreover, this is not just a North American trend. Large bowel cancer is on the also rise around the world. The question is, why has this occurred. Colon cancer is now the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for men under the age of 50. And it’s the second leading cause for women under 50 years of age. Large bowel cancer and rectal cancer are often linked together. And there is evidence that this increase may be related to an increase in rectal cancer. But it does not totally explain the increase. Do genes play a role in the earlier onset of malignancy? A family history of the problem is a factor for some people. For others, doctors have suspected that cell mutations may be the driving force. The presence of large precancerous polyps in the colon means a greater risk. But questions remain about why there is a rise in large bowel cancer among younger people. Could it be that changing lifestyles all over the world play a role? Despite talk of healthier diets, people are eating more red meat than ever – up over 10% in the last decade and more of it consumed after processing into convenient foods. People are eating other highly processed foods, downing too much sugar, and binge drinking alcohol. Researchers have shown that some individuals have good bacteria in their intestines, others bad bacteria. There are also questions about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These pain killers may have an adverse effect on the gut. Clusters of malignancies are seen in some areas. In southern Mississippi, people living near chemical plants are exposed to trace elements such as nickel, arsenic, and chromium. Could these potentially toxic materials be associated with the increase in cancer? Researchers are also aware of another pandemic, and not a viral disease lasting just three years. It’s the much worse global crisis of obesity, a long-enduring pandemic. The increase in obesity mirrors the increase in malignancies. But not all patients with colon cancer are overweight. Experts contend there is no single smoking gun responsible for cancer. Multiple risk factors need to be addressed. What can people do to decrease the risk of dying from colon cancer? People need to assist their doctors with early diagnosis. First, never assume rectal bleeding is due to hemorrhoids. Second, colonoscopy is the only way to rule out malignancy. This requires laxatives that clean the bowel of fecal material. Then doctors insert a lighted instrument to examine the large bowel. This can be done under full anesthesia or with medication to relieve the minimal discomfort. Please, do not listen to scaremongers saying colonoscopy is a painful procedure. It’s better labelled a discomfort. Sedation-free procedures are safe, and people can return to normal activities right away. How many people with rectal bleeding have said, “No one is going to a colonoscopy on me,” and now are dead? Dying from a metastatic colon malignancy is many times more painful than the temporary discomfort of a colonoscopy. Don’t make this terrible mistake. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Are the U.S. Presidential Candidates Too Old?

By W. Gifford-Jones MD and Diana Gifford It’s a question on the minds of most Americans, and others too. Biden is 81 and Trump 77. Are they sufficiently health of body and mind to be President? Neither candidate has agreed to a comprehensive and transparent assessment of their mental health. But their state of mind is important, particularly now, when Putin is threatening the use of nuclear weapons. Are they both afraid of getting a D result? And what about being honest with the American public, knowing they face an exhausting campaign? At their ages, with a ton of luck, both have a life expectancy of around eight years. As for the chances of remaining healthy during that time, we would not bet on it. Biden walks with a stiffness now and it will increase with time. Trump faces a greater problem due to obesity. He is a walking model for cardiovascular disease, the big killer. How well do they sleep? We have little doubt that Biden sleeps better. He also appears to be happily married, and that’s a huge plus. If better rested, he will have more energy to deploy his political skills to the campaign. But does Trump ever sleep soundly? How can anyone believe he is happily married? He also must keep one eye on his many legal problems and other eye on his financial debts. Our bet is he tosses around in bed, a big negative for his overall health. What about the inner character and soul of these two candidates? We are grateful to have spent many years of study and work in the US and we have lifelong friends there. But we wonder why half the population adores (or puts up with) Trump who lies through his teeth, demeans women, tried to buy votes, and could not accept a fair defeat. We would suggest that Trump desperately needs a psychiatrist, and we have questions about half the population of this great democracy too. Could not another candidate be found? Dr. Rudolph Tanzi, a professor of neurology at the Harvard Medical School, says we need a neuropsychological examination of both Biden and Trump. This involves a series of 31 tests that can detect dementia and other brain dysfunction. It’s frightening what the figures show. Between the ages of 65 and 69, three percent of people have dementia. By age 90, it increases to a whopping 35 percent! The critical fact that we all, including presidents, have to accept is that getting older is very hazardous for the brain and all other parts of the body. But why do Biden and Trump want this top job at their advanced ages, a job that is so demanding day after day in light of domestic challenges and the Russo-Ukrainian and Israel-Hamas wars? Of course, being President of the greatest country is the obvious answer. Moreover, a ton of privileges go with the task. What will voters and the press have to accept? They must realize that Biden and Trump will continue to make elderly gaffes during interviews and speeches. Other age-related problems need to be anticipated. Trumps family history must also cause some concern. His father suffered from Alzheimer’s disease in his mid 80s. According to the experts, Trumps chances of this disease increase by about 39 per cent. And both candidates must be extremely wary of falling. From 65 to 84, it’s the second leading cause of injury-related deaths. How will this end? We believe there will be a medical tragedy due to their ages. We hope both of them choose healthy and extremely wise vice-presidents. Sign-up at www.docgiff.com to receive our weekly e-newsletter. For comments, contact-us@docgiff.com. Follow us Instagram @docgiff and @diana_gifford_jones

Excuse me I am Canadian

By Dale Jodoin As Canadians, we pride ourselves on being fair, polite, and reasonable. But there comes a point where even the most patient among us can't stay silent anymore. We're beyond fed up with the mess our Prime Minister has made, and the so-called "unbiased" news that keeps covering for him is just adding fuel to the fire. Let's talk about the trucker protest, for starters. Regular Canadians from all walks of life—different races, religions, and backgrounds—came together to stand up against government policies they didn't agree with. What was their reward? Our Prime Minister immediately branded them as racists and extremists. He even went as far as to claim they were getting money from some of the worst hate groups out there. And like clockwork, the news media lapped it up and spit it back out, painting these hardworking Canadians as villains on national TV. But that's just the tip of the iceberg. When people started to question where all the taxpayer money that's been sent overseas was going, the government's response was to shout "racism" from the rooftops. They say we're against freedom because we want accountability for billions of dollars? That’s not just misleading; it’s downright insulting. We have every right to demand transparency about where our money is going, especially when it's going abroad with no clear plan or payback. And when the news finally started reporting on foreign interference in our elections—something incredibly serious—the Prime Minister dismissed those concerns by attacking the character of anyone who dared bring it up. First, he labeled them as racists or homophobic, and then tried to bury the whole thing under a mountain of secrecy. But when documents surfaced proving he knew about the interference all along, he simply shrugged and denied everything. We've had enough of the lies and the sneaky tactics. The Prime Minister is supposed to unite the country, not divide it with false accusations and political games. He's supposed to lead by example, not by manipulation. Our schools aren't immune to this mess either. Public education is pushing political ideologies, teaching kids that communism is something to aspire to. They’re not learning to think critically; they're being taught to conform. Parents are right to be worried. Our children should be getting a balanced education, not being indoctrinated with radical ideas under the guise of progressivism. And let's not forget how all this political drama is hitting us where it hurts the most: our wallets. Housing prices are through the roof, gas prices are a nightmare, and despite our country's efforts to be carbon neutral, we're still getting hammered with carbon taxes. These taxes are supposed to help the environment, but all they're doing is draining our bank accounts and hurting businesses. The young people of this country, the ones who are supposed to be the future, are turning their backs on this Prime Minister. They're tired of empty promises and high costs of living. They want change, and they want it now. When the next election rolls around, don’t be surprised if the Prime Minister tries to play the same old cards, calling anyone who opposes him a racist or extremist. But we know the truth. We’re not extremists. We’re average Canadians, stuck in the middle of a political mess, just looking for fair treatment and a government that actually listens. It's time for a new government. One that will go after the real problems, like the indoctrination in our schools and the unchecked spending. We need a leader who will sit down with provincial heads and tackle our issues head-on, not one who spends his time defending his poor decisions and dividing the nation. We want a country where everyone, young and old, can afford a home and live without financial fear. A country where immigration is managed fairly and education is unbiased. Most importantly, we want a country where no group is set above another, where all Canadians can enjoy a peaceful life. Our patience has run out. It’s time to stop the name-calling, stop the lies, and start fixing what’s been broken. It’s time to kick the real troublemakers out of office and bring in leaders who will restore the fairness and respect Canada is known for. We deserve better, and we’re going to fight for it at the voting booth. Call us what you want, but we believe in a fair Canada, a peaceful Canada, for all.

Guide Your Job Search With These Two Universal Truths

By Nick Kossovan There's no shortage of job search advice floating around that contradicts. · Resumes (formatting, length, how to beat the employer's ATS, as if that's possible) · Cover letters (Include or don't include?) · Whether using LinkedIn's #OpenToWork green banner feature makes you appear desperate. · Interview advice All job search advice, including mine, is subject to bias. My first The Art of Finding Work column was titled There Is No Universal Hiring Methodology. In this column, I explained that hiring is more emotional than logical and, therefore, a highly subjective process. Protest all you want; the fact remains that hiring is heavily influenced by biases and gut feelings, resulting in no two recruiters or hiring managers assessing candidates the same way. One interviewer's deal breaker may not be another's. Self-proclaiming career coaches like to claim that the formula for successful job hunting is A + B + C = "You're hired!" Predictably, they also claim they have the formula for you to purchase (book, webinar, becoming a client of their coaching service). My question: How can a formula exist with gut instinct being the driving force behind hiring decisions? I've hired: · a candidate was more than 20 minutes late for their interview. · candidates who asked, within five minutes of starting the interview, "How many vacation days will I get?" · candidates who've been unemployed for more than nine months. · candidates (lost count of) who were over the age of 50. · a candidate who brought her cat, Duchess, who'd undergone surgery that morning, to the interview. (This hire was a stretch even for me, but I couldn't ignore her career story, set of skills, and strong personality.) Another hiring manager would have likely rejected these candidates. Vice versa, candidates I've rejected inevitably went on to be hired by hiring managers who didn't consider why I rejected them relevant. Rather than trying to juggle all the conflicting job search advice you're receiving—attempting to please all employers—focus on, better yet embrace, these two universal truisms. 1. Your success depends on what others think of you. Nowadays, the standard "life advice" is to not care what other people think about you. This advice, which I strongly disagree with, has led to the prevalence of self-centred behaviour. Being successful is highly dependent on your image and what others think of you. Searching for a job involves actively seeking approval. First you need the employer to approve—like what they see—your resume and LinkedIn profile. Then, to be approved for an in-person interview, you must pass a phone screening. Then, your interviewer must approve you for a second interview or to be hired. All these approvals required someone to think you deserve a "yes." If everyone actually didn't care what others thought of them, social media wouldn't be filled with approval-seeking posts, and rejection wouldn't hurt. Yet, job seekers constantly complain about being rejected (read: not approved) without receiving feedback, suggesting they care what their interviewer thought of them. As you realize how others perceive you is the key determining factor to your success, you'll ask yourself: How do people experience me? Be honest. How do people experience you? How do people feel in your presence? A challenge: 1. Solicit the opinion(s) of family members and friends regarding how they perceive you. 2. Based on the feedback, adjust your behaviour and shift your thinking. 3. Make it your mission to give those in your presence a memorable interpersonal experience. 2. Image is everything. People watch in a mall, restaurant, or on a busy street. You'll notice that most people don't take their image seriously or subscribe to the "don't care what other people think of you" advice. Whether you like it or not, humans are wired to judge a book by its cover. Therefore, how someone experiences you begins with your appearance. When it comes to interviewing, having an off-putting appearance will overshadow—not in a good way—your answers. When interviewing, you must be the best version of yourself. Consider this uncomfortable question: Those times when you aced, at least thought you did, the interview but didn't get the job, could it have been because of your appearance? According to research, a person's opinion of you is formed in just three seconds. Psychologists call it "thin slicing." Your interviewer will make four snap judgments when meeting you for the first time: 1. Are you trustworthy? 2. Intelligence level 3. Your professionalism 4. Whether they like you Everything I mentioned can be influenced, starting with how you dress and by looking your interviewer in the eye. Then, check your mannerisms and communication skills; both are imperative to your job search and career success. Looking your best gives you the mental state you need more than ever in today's competitive job market: Confidence. Commit to the following: · Exercising · Eating healthy · Getting enough sleep · Wearing proper fitting age-appropriate clothes · Smiling (Your teeth' role in how people perceive you can't be overstated.) Hire an image consultant if you need one; it’ll be money well spent. Don't underestimate, or worse, deny, the correlation between how your physical appearance impacts your life experiences and opportunities. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

Canada’s recent immigration policy and the unforeseen effects

by Maj (ret'd) CORNELIU. CHISU, CD, PMSC, FEC, CET, P. Eng. Former Member of Parliament Pickering-Scarborough East In its well-meaning effort to encourage immigration, the Trudeau government showed bad timing by increasing the immigration numbers at a time when Canada is confronted with an unprecedented housing crisis, issues in the health care system and a downturn in the economy. The Liberals have nearly doubled the number of permanent residents being admitted to this country, from 260,400 in 2014, to a projected 500,000 next year. Canada is now bringing in more immigrants than at any other time in its history. Last year, a record-breaking 431,645 permanent residents entered Canada, an influx almost exactly equivalent to the entire metro population of Halifax. This level of immigration is even higher than seen in the brief period before the First World War when Canada was frantically hustling in steamships full of Eastern European immigrants to settle the prairies. Today, however, there does not seem to be any plan on the part of the government or plan from the opposition to create new settlements in order to develop Canada’s resources. These totals are also well beyond the totals of another country historically big on immigration, the United States. On a per capita basis, Canada is now bringing in four times more immigrants than the Americans. And, Ottawa is looking to push it higher still. By 2025, Canada is set to receive up to 500,000 newcomers per year. In just the next three years, Canada is planning to bring in enough new Canadians (1.45 million) to equal the entire population of Manitoba. While Canadians have not abandoned their national love of immigration, there are clear signs that people are nervous about the tempo, amid crunches in the health system, housing and other infrastructure. As a result, broad public support for immigration, the cornerstone of multicultural Canada, is eroding. At the core of the problem we also have badly thought-out migration of international students to Canada. The flood of international students – there are now more than a million – who have been coming into Canada in recent years has created a huge problem, especially in housing. Many of these students get a sound education, land good jobs, and eventually become valued Canadian citizens. However, others show up at so-called puppy mills: pop-up private colleges noticeably lacking in academic rigour, without much in the way of classrooms or teachers. This clearly illustrates poor coordination between the Federal government responsible for immigration and the Provincial governments responsible for education. Both of them are putting political gains before the interests of Canadians. The Federal government ostensibly demonstrates its openness and responsiveness in taking measures to compensate for an aging work force by increasing the number of immigrants. However, their lack of vision and planning in pursuing this policy, demonstrates that they are only looking to increase their political base, not to build this country. At the same time, Provincial governments are relaxing education standards, claiming that they are showing openness and inclusivity for immigration. No immigrant comes to Canada to have their children get a watered down education, so this too, is a ploy for increasing political base rather than working for the good of the electorate. In fact, it does not matter which party is in power either federally or provincially. Immigration is seen primarily as a tool for political advantage, rather than a way to benefit the nation. Here we are then, with a major problem on our hands, as millions of newcomers compete with those already here, for a place to call home. The result is that Canada has the worst housing crisis in the G7. Government politicians are fighting with their respective opposition members, but apparently neither of them have real solutions for the problems they have created. The quick integration of newcomers into the Canadian way of life has many obstacles, which both the Federal and the Provincial governments have totally neglected to deal with. One of the main obstacles is the provincial system of regulating the professions through self-regulatory bodies. Unfortunately, these entities are out of touch with the times in which we live. They are primarily self-serving with no government over say in their activity. Legislatively they could have crucial input, but they prefer not to exercise it most of the time. These obstacles create a brake on the productivity of the country with most immigrants finding that their qualifications are not accepted, so they cannot work in their field of expertise. This is not good for either the immigrants or the country, especially now, when Canada is seeing a collapse in its productivity. One solution would be for the Federal government, which has jurisdiction to enter into international agreements, to work with the provinces to negotiate mutual recognition of degrees from foreign countries, and then eliminate this obstacle to accessing professions. The provinces should also have better input and overview on professional designations and practice, as they have a role in the professions acts and regulations, which they rarely exercise. I personally hope that Canada will continue to be a welcoming country for immigrants, but there is a dire need for politicians to work with Canadians in order to work out the right policy for immigration. What do you think?

STUGOTS $1.80

STUGOTS $1.80 By Rosaldo Russo Allow me to begin this column by thanking the Oshawa/Central newspaper for allowing me the opportunity and access to the press. Not to many if any allow an average person like me to tell the world what I see and think. In my opinion. The Editor/Publisher is a real upstanding type of guy. He shoots from the hip and hold traditional core values. My name is Rosaldo Russo. I came to this great country to make a better life for myself and my family. I thank Canada for everything it has allowed me to do and earn. I worked construction all my life. I know the value of hard work and honesty. I remember as a boy my father always telling me to work hard and buy land. So I did. I remember days when I did not have enough to eat. I go to work... but I did not wait for hand outs. I rounded up my pride my skill and my determination to succeed and went to work. In those days the only benefits we received was the fact we were employed. Before retiring I was the owner and operator of local material supply company that allowed me to retired without worry. Now that I have time to enjoy life. I look around me and have some concern for future generations. I see that the world is finished. Before anyone gets offended. Let me explain what Stugots means.... Stugots is Italian mob slang lingo - Italian term that refers to the male genetalia. It is used to describe an idiot or a jerk. Now, I think that later is more descriptive of how our government treat us. The first more like those we elect to office. I read a report on Monday warning me that by the end of the week the gas could go up as much as fourteen cents. Managia, fourteen cents... Che Fai, then they tell us on Wednesday that lucky us we may see gas prices drop as much as four cents. Now am I blind, stupid or plain retarded? They raise 14 on Friday, the following Monday they drop four cents... They still stuck it to us for ten cents... But this is not the worst. This mathematical conundrum is an open license for grocery stores to jump their prices in the name of high fuel costs. I say, Bull dingy. This is an outright rip off. Not only is it bad that people can’t pay for the inflated food prices. Now they will not be able to afford gas to go to work and make the little they make to pay for groceries. Come on people. Where is the Canadian red blood? Is it not time for Canadians to grow some grapes and call the government out. We can send millions if not billions to fight loosing foreign wars. We can’t take care of young families wanting to start a new life but can’t due to the outrageous house prices. Now they can’t even afford to drive to work. They surely will not be able to pay for food. $14.00/lb for beef at some stores. Hamburger almost $10/lb. Are you kidding me. But wait. We the apologetic people of Canada may go hungry and homeless before we figure it out. WE ARE GETTING SCREWED AND FORCED TO LIKE IT. Let’s send a clear messages that those Stugots we elected will not treat us the hard working tax paying Stugots like a bunch of Stugots. Oh Canada... Our home and native Stugots.

Safe streets act

Safe streets act By Dale Jodoin In a significant legal development, the Ontario courts have partially overturned the Safe Streets Act, specifically targeting provisions that have long been a cornerstone in regulating public solicitation. The court struck down sections related to "aggressive solicitation" and location-based restrictions, such as near ATMs, public toilets, and transit stops, deeming them unconstitutional. These sections were criticized for violating the freedom of expression and the presumption of innocence. The ruling has not completely dismantled the Safe Streets Act. Certain elements, like the ban on stepping onto roadways to solicit funds from drivers and engaging in solicitation aggressively, still stand, highlighting a compromise between public safety and individual rights. However, this decision stirs a complex debate about the impact of panhandling on local businesses and public safety, particularly in downtown areas. Before this ruling, it was rare to enforce the now-overturned restrictions rigorously, yet they offered a sense of security to businesses and pedestrians. The presence of panhandlers around sensitive areas like banks and businesses historically created a tense atmosphere, with incidents of aggression when panhandlers were refused money. This, understandably, sparked fear and discomfort, contributing to a perception of insecurity that could drive businesses out of downtown cores. Critics argue that the relaxed restrictions may lead to a "free-for-all" situation, where increased panhandling could negatively affect local commerce. Business owners, who contribute significantly to municipal taxes, feel particularly aggrieved. They argue that their taxes help fund social services that assist the homeless and other vulnerable populations, yet their businesses suffer from the very issues they help address. Furthermore, the economic strain on everyday citizens is palpable. With taxes rising to accommodate social programs and the cost of living increasing, the public’s capacity to give charitably is stretched thin. The frustration is evident as people feel pressured into giving directly on the streets, while also contributing through taxes. This scenario creates a double-edged sword: there is a desire to help those in need, but resentment builds as personal financial burdens grow. The court’s decision h

as opened a can of worms regarding the balance between individual rights and community welfare. The question arises: were the judges and policymakers out of touch with the daily realities of downtown businesses and safety? The original intent of the Safe Streets Act was to protect both the public and the vulnerable, yet its partial repeal raises concerns about whether true balance can be achieved. As Ontario grapples with these changes, the future of downtown safety and economic stability hangs in the balance. It remains to be seen how this decision will affect the dynamics of charity, business, and public welfare in the long term. For many, this ruling is not just about constitutional rights but also about maintaining a quality of life that keeps downtown areas thriving and safe for everyone.

Side Hustle Culture: Extending Our Working Hours to Keep Up Appearances

By Nick Kossovan I'm sure you're aware of all the side hustle evangelists online touting that everyone should have a side hustle, peddling their "side hustle formula" and "get-rich-quick" schemes. They portray having a side hustle as a glamorous pursuit of ambition, masking the fundamental motivator: additional income to keep up appearances. Having said this, I can't make this assertion without acknowledging that the workplace has become an existential nightmare. AI, automation, and robotics eliminating jobs, social media's emergence and CEOs creating headline-making layoffs every time the economy sneezes are partially fueling the side hustle culture; however, these aren't the primary reasons for the trend. The reason is the implied social contract—never promised—of working 40 hours per week in exchange for enough money to live on defaulted long ago. Nine-to-five has become an existential nightmare. Many millennials and Gen Zs, enough for employers to make sweeping generalizations about their work ethics, have come to feel that nine-to-five offers little in return for all the demands they feel it places on them. Putting in an eight-hour workday, plus commute time, is unappealing—downright distasteful—when carrying the sense of entitlement narrative "I'm better than this." What is appealing is the "Image is everything" lifestyle social media influencers and marketing propaganda promote. Having a second, sometimes third, job to supplement one's income to pay the bills and make ends meet has always been common. However, our consumerism—bills—have dramatically changed since the advent of the Internet and social media. Today, our consumerism revolves around looking rich and impressing. What ends—what bills—are those with a side hustle trying to meet? Based on my observations, I'd say that most people who claim they have difficulty making ends meet prioritize having the latest iPhone, wearing designer clothes, and living in a house larger than they need over being prudent with their money. Most North Americans could downsize their lifestyle by half and live far more comfortably than most worldwide. Contrary to our first-world lifestyle, characterized by financial waste and its multitude of negative environmental impacts, according to the World Bank Group, half of the global population lives on less than $6.85US a day. Westerners live a lifestyle most of the world's population doesn't come close to living. Easy access to credit makes it possible to make $60K a year and appear, by your spending, to make $120K a year. However, credit requires interest-bearing repayment. Instead of cutting back on using credit (read: downsizing your lifestyle), many start a side hustle—Grind! Grind! Grind!—to keep their facade of prosperity visible. Thanks to constantly evolving psychologically penetrating marketing techniques and social media, a godsend to marketers, keeping up with the Jones has never been more prevalent. Apart from lottery winners and those who received an inheritance, rich people are rich because they've adopted the habit of prioritizing saving and investing BEFORE spending. (Paying yourself first, while not sexy, is stoic money management advice that, when followed, significantly benefits your financial health.) Your only glimpse of the rich is how they spend money on things you wish you had. Unseen: Most of their income goes towards savings and investments. They only spend a portion of their income. Many people have a hard time managing their money because they copy the spending style of those with money rather than how they earn and manage their money. Many will cite that the side hustle culture offers an opportunity to "pursue one's passion." What does this even mean? Is making money from one's passion a requirement? A person who says they're passionate about ceramics certainly doesn't mean they're passionate about spending several hours a week researching social media trends, handling paperwork, and marketing their hand-made pottery business. Turning your hobby into a side hustle is turning your hobby into work. Furthermore, if the money generated from that work is to help finance keeping up appearances, is it still a work of passion? We need three things to survive: food, water, and protection from the elements (shelter and clothing). Everything else exists for comfort; hence, most things only exist for us to buy and for someone to make money. The side hustle culture trend didn't arise out of survival necessity, to make financial stability (read: savings, investing) fashionable or because people have become more ambitious. It emerged because someone saw, and many others followed, they could profit from our fear of how others will judge our lifestyle. Ultimately, the side hustle culture reflects a broader societal problem: our obsession with appearances and materialism. Our pursuit of material wealth comes at the cost of being trapped in a cycle of consumerism, constantly chasing the latest trends and accruing debt. Our respective finances and the environment would greatly benefit from starting and embracing a new trend that celebrates contentment and financial prudence over keeping up appearances. Let's call it aligning your lifestyle with your income. _____________________________________________________________________ Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers advice on searching for a job. You can send him your questions at artoffindingwork@gmail.com

In nothing we find everything and in everything we find nothi

In nothing we find everything and in everything we find nothing By Joe Ingino Editor/Publisher Much like the truth is out there. In nothing we can find everything and in everything we find nothing. Truth is the absolete understanding of nothing through interpretation and understanding of everything. Something that is not achievable by the human mind as the constant struggle between nothing and something rage on through one’s existence. This confusing the mind in a web of moral entanglement based on environmental divide. Look at the human animal. From nothing we evolve to something, that constantly changes to everything around us. From our molecular structure to our interactions. Evolution in it’s ongoing expansion and disclosure of everything clouds our minds in a romantic coccon of confusion. The more we evolve the more we see nothing. Our confusion mounts to such levels that compromises logic and common sense. It challenges natural laws and impedes natural growth of the mind and body. Love and hate become one, entangles in something that gives meaning to people’s everything. This passion translates to the understanding of nothing in claim of everything. The human mind is limited to know nothing, yet profess to know everything. An impossible feat as one can’t exist with the other. We look around the world and bring to question. How is it that the people of a Nation can turn on each other. How can such acts of horror be committed towards another? The answer lies in confused minds that profess to know everything when in reality they know nothing. Some may claim that nothing is in part pure innocence. Others may deem it as pure ignorance. But everything could not exist without nothing. If this stands true then, we as humans may never achieve full knowledge of everything as we fail to understand nothing. Now, what is nothing. Nothing is existence and the need for the human mind to evolve. To create a reality that is governed by everything around us and rooted in nothing or as stated, ignorance and innocence. Look in a dark room. What do you see. Do you seen nothing or do you see everything. The darkness in the room is just a measure of our perception of nothing.